Rates of diabetic retinopathy among cluster analysis-identified type 2 diabetic mellitus subgroups.

PURPOSE: To determine whether phenotypic clustering of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with more advanced diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 495 patients with no prior DR treatment seen at a tertiary care clinic 2014-2020. Four previously identified clusters from Ahlqvist's 2018 paper were reproduced utilizing baseline hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, and age at DM diagnosis. Age-adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare clusters with reference as the lowest risk cluster. RESULTS: All four type 2 DM clusters were replicated with our cohort. There was a significant difference in racial distribution among clusters (p = 0.018) with severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) having the higher percentage of Caucasians and lower percentage of Hispanics compared to other groups and a higher percentage of African Americans comprising the severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) cluster than other groups. Rates of proliferative diabetic retinopathy were higher in mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD) (28%), SIDD (24%), mild age-related diabetes (MARD) (20%), and lowest in SIRD (7.9%), overall p = 0.004. Rates of vitreous hemorrhage were higher in MOD (p = 0.032) and MARD (0.005) compared to SIRD. CONCLUSION: Baseline clinical measures may be useful in risk stratifying patients for progression to retinopathy requiring intervention.

Long-term real-world outcomes of retinal microvasculature changes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with panretinal photocoagulation vs. intravitreal conbercept.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term real-world outcomes of retinal microvasculature changes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs. intravitreal conbercept (IVC) and to explore the potential factors affecting these changes. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 96 treatment-naïve PDR eyes of 96 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients [59 PRP and 37 IVC]. Baseline characteristics and treatment details were collected. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) data of macular vessel density (VD) and optic disc capillary density (CD) at baseline and at the last follow-up were compared between groups. The differences between the baseline and the last follow-up OCTA data in each group were also tested for significance. The correlation between the change in each OCTA parameter from baseline and each baseline characteristic/treatment parameter was investigated in each group. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of two years, greater superficial (SCP) (p = 0.004) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) VD (p < 0.001) were observed in the foveal area in the PRP than in the IVC. Compared to the baseline, SCP VD in the foveal area increased in the PRP (p = 0.012), while an increased SCP VD in some sectors in the parafoveal and perifoveal areas (p < 0.05), rather than the foveal area (p = 0.908), was seen in the IVC. For both groups, eyes with a higher VD/CD at baseline tended to develop capillary dropout more intensively (all p < 0.05). In the IVC group, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area change showed a negative correlation with baseline FAZ area (p = 0.020), and complementary PRP exerted a negative influence on FAZ area change (p = 0.002). In the PRP group, SCP VD change was positively correlated with follow-up frequency, and was negatively correlated with diastolic blood pressure (all p < 0.05); DCP VD change showed a positive correlation with PRP shot number (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: The aforementioned microvasculature changes should be considered when PRP or IVC is adopted in PDR long-term management.

Panretinal photocoagulation plus intravitreal conbercept for diabetic retinopathy in real world: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) plus intravitreal conbercept (IVC) for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in real world and explore risk factors for patients with poor reactivity and presence of vision-threatening complications after combination treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review of DR patients received PRP plus IVC over 6 months. The main outcome was improvement ≥ 2 steps in ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity scale (DRSS) levels. Different strategies for eyes receiving IVC within or over 1 month after PRP were analyzed. For patients with DRSS improvement < 2 steps and presence of vision-threatening adverse events, a binary logistic regression method was used to select risk factors. RESULTS: Sixty one eyes were involved in this study. After treated with combination therapy with a median number of 3 injections, 44% of eyes improved ≥ 2 steps in DRSS levels. A total of 14 eyes (23%) occurred vision-threatening adverse events. No significant difference was found in eyes receiving conbercept within or over 1 month after PRP. Duration of diabetes (OR 0.849, 95%CI 0.734-0.982, P = 0.027), GFR (OR 0.961, 95%CI 0.933-0.990, P = 0.010) and baseline DRSS levels (OR 3.290, 95%CI 1.483-7.295, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for DRSS improvement < 2 steps after treatment. Occurrence of vision-threatening complications was only related to high DRSS levels (OR 3.668, 95%CI 1.710-7.868, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy was effective for most patients with DR in real world. Eyes received PRP combined with earlier or later conbercept was demonstrated no significant difference for outcomes. For patients with poor renal function, high DRSS levels or occurred DR at the early stage of diabetes, follow-up should be strengthened.

Cost-effectiveness of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injection and panretinal photocoagulation for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: We determined the cost-effectiveness of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection versus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in South Korea. METHODS: We simulated four treatment strategies using PRP and the anti-VEGF injection by constructing a Markov model for a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old PDR patients: (1) PRP only; (2) anti-VEGF injection only; (3) PRP first; and (4) anti-VEGF injection first. RESULTS: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, compared with only-PRP, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $95,456 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for PRP first, $34,375 per QALY for anti-VEGF injection first, and $33,405 per QALY for anti-VEGF injection only from a healthcare perspective. From the societal and payer perspective, strategy (2) was more cost-saving and effective than (1). In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, only-PRP was cost-effective up to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of about $42,000, while anti-VEGF injection only was cost-effective from a healthcare perspective. From the societal and payer perspectives, regardless of the value of WTP, anti-VEGF injection only was the most cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSION: In our study, the anti-VEGF injection for PDR was cost-effective from the payer and societal perspectives.

Alterations in choroidal vascular parameters following panretinal photocoagulation using enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography in diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the alteration of choroid in patients with very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) following panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). METHODS: Thirty-nine eyes of 21 patients with very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (19 eyes) and early proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (20 eyes) were recruited. Enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography at baseline, 1, and 6 months after PRP was employed to measure choroidal parameters including total choroidal area (TCA) and choroidal vascular index (CVI). RESULTS: In eyes with very severe NPDR, subfoveal TCA decreased non-significantly at month 1, which increased significantly at month 6 (539 ± 131µm2, 502 ± 134µm2, and 598 ± 168µm2 at baseline and months 1 and 6, respectively; P = 0.003). Subfoveal CVI increased at month 1 and then decreased at month 6 (68.25 ± 3.05, 69.74 ± 3.62, and 67.84 ± 1.77 at baseline and months 1 and 6, respectively; P < 0.001). A reverse pattern occurred in eyes with early PDR, a non-significant increase in TCA at month 1 followed by a decrease at month 6 (497 ± 95µm2, 514 ± 133µm2, and 425 ± 95µm2 at baseline and months 1 and 6, respectively; P = 0.011). CVI decreased at month 1 and remained relatively stable at month 6 (69.34 ± 3.11, 68.33 ± 3.41, and 68.50 ± 5.04 at baseline, and months 1 and 6, respectively; P = 0.023). Alteration of choroidal thickness was not statistically significant in both groups. CONCLUSION: Eyes with very severe NPDR and early PDR exhibit a reverse pattern regarding choroidal indices after PRP.

Vision-Related Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction Following Panretinal Photocoagulation in Diabetic Retinopathy-A Panel Study.

Background and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate vision-related quality of life (VR-QOL) and treatment satisfaction (TS) in patients with diabetic retinopathy treated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Material and Methods: The panel study included 95 patients who underwent PRP for diabetic retinopathy. Eligible patients with no history of previous PRP were interviewer-administered the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and Retinopathy Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (RetTSQ) beforehandand one month after the last session of laser application. The study was conducted between June 2017 and June 2019 at tertiary care center in Serbia, Belgrade. We assessed pre- to post-PRP values of the composite score and subscale scores of VFQ-25 and RetTSQ, using a paired samples t-test. Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between binary outcomes and potential predictors. Multivariate regression included predictors from univariate analyses that were statistically significant. Results: The mean VFQ-25 composite score was 65.4 ± 17.4 before and 63.3 ± 19.5 after PRP (p = 0.045). Subscale analysis showed that two of the 11 items achieved a significant decrease after laser application (general vision and dependency). The mean RetTSQ score at baseline was 60.0 ± 11.8 and at the exit visit was 60.3 ± 12.3 (p = 0.858). Sub-scale analysis showed significant deterioration for five of the 13 items. Multivariate logistic regression found that significant predictor of VFQ-25 composite score reduction was fewer laser burns (p = 0.002) while significant predictor of RetTSQ total score reduction was presence of hyperlipidaemia (p = 0.021). Conclusion: The use of vision-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction questionnaires in conjunction with clinical examination, appears to provide a more comprehensive overview of an individual's daily well-being following PRP. Laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy leads to deterioration of some of the patients' perceived VR-QOL and TS. Health-care providers should inform patients about their treatment options and together decide which therapeutic method is best for them.

Morphological Changes in the Foveal Avascular Zone after Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy Using OCTA: A Study Focusing on Macular Ischemia.

Background and objectives: This study aimed to analyze the morphological changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with diabetic retinopathy, with a particular focus on the presence or absence of comorbid diabetic macular ischemia (DMI), using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Materials and Methods: Treatment-naïve 25 eyes of 16 patients who received PRP were examined in this retrospective case series. FAZ area, perimeter, and circularity were calculated on a 3 × 3-mm en-face OCTA image before PRP (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after PRP. The patients were divided into two groups according to coexisting DMI, and each group was statistically analyzed. Results: In patients with DMI (9 eyes), FAZ area significantly decreased from the baseline to 3 months after PRP (0.86 ± 0.56 to 0.61 ± 0.31 mm2, p = 0.018), whereas FAZ perimeter and circularity remained unchanged following treatment (p = 0.569 and 0.971, respectively). In patients without DMI (16 eyes), FAZ parameters did not show statistically significant changes across the 3-month follow-up period. Conclusion: PRP significantly reduces FAZ area in patients with DMI.

Optociliary Shunt Vessels or Neovascularisation of the Optic Disc: Fluorescein Angiography Versus Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

A 56-year-old man with a history of gallbladder carcinoma, hypothyroidism and hypertension was examined by us after developing marked visual loss in his left eye. A left ischaemic type of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with macular oedema was diagnosed. Three months later, a non-ischaemic type of CRVO with no macular oedema developed in his right eye. While the left eye received five intravitreal ranibizumab injections and panretinal photocoagulation, the right central retinal vein occlusion improved spontaneously without any treatment. Ten months after his first visit we noticed optociliary shunt vessel formation in the right eye and neovascularisation of the optic disc in the left eye. Fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography were performed at the same visit. The place of fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography in distinguishing the optociliary shunt vessel from neovascularisation of the optic disc is discussed.

Management of Complications and Vision Loss from Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetes can be associated with profound visual loss due to several mechanisms. As the duration of diabetes and blood glucose levels increase, these changes become more severe. The proliferation of new blood vessels, vitreous hemorrhage, and tractional retinal detachments may ultimately result and can be devastating to visual function. New advances, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications and innovative microsurgical instruments, have provided additional methods for the management of diabetic retinopathy in the clinic and in the operating room, leading to improved outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in earlier treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, especially with anti-VEGF injections, allow for a reduction in severity, improved vision, and more controlled and successful surgery. Modern surgical techniques and instrumentation have also allowed for improved patient outcomes. Future research into sustained delivery and release of anti-VEGF, reducing the need for frequent in-office injections, may prove to be additionally beneficial. Over the last decade, anti-VEGF has become an increasingly common treatment modality for the management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, vitreous hemorrhages, and tractional retinal detachments. Further research is needed to determine the ideal method of delivery and timing of the treatment.

Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights indications and evidence on laser therapy in the management of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Particular focus is placed upon the benefits and limitations of conventional laser photocoagulation versus more modern laser photocoagulation techniques, as well as the role of laser photocoagulation in treatment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema with the frequent utilization of pharmacologic, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Laser photocoagulation remains the gold-standard therapy for the effective, definitive treatment of PDR, and also is highly effective in the management of DME. However, numerous recent studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy and improved functional and anatomic outcomes of combination therapy with pharmacologic treatment. Continuing innovations in laser technology and improved understanding of laser-retinal interactions and pathophysiology demonstrate that laser therapy will continue to play a critical role in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema for many years to come.