Efficacy of endoscopic therapy combined with partial splenic embolization versus Hassab's operation for patients with liver cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding and hypersplenism: a multicenter cohort study based on propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis comparison between endoscopic therapy + partial splenic embolization (PSE) and Hassab's operation is unclear in the treatment of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to compare the outcome of endoscopic therapy + PSE (EP) with a combination of splenectomy + pericardial devascularization procedure, known as Hassab's operation (SH) for esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis with hypersplenism. METHODS: We enrolled 328 patients, including 125 and 203 patients who underwent EP and SH, respectively. Each group consisted of 110 patients after propensity score matching (PSM). Subsequently, we recorded and analyzed bleeding episodes and mortality in 6 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies. RESULTS: The median follow-up time in the EP and SH groups was 53 and 64 months, respectively. Bleeding incidence 6 months after therapies in the EP group was lower than that in the SH group (1.8% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.010). Additionally, complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different (0% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.008). However, the bleeding rate between the two groups was not significantly different at 1, 2, and 5 years after therapies (7.3% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.157; 10.9% vs. 16.4%, P = 0.205; 30.6% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.801), as well as mortality rate (4.5% vs 7.3%, P = 0.571). CONCLUSION: Compared with SH therapy, the bleeding rate 6 months after EP therapy was lower, but the long-term bleeding rate was similar.

Comparison of splenic embolization and splenectomy for traumatic splenic rupture: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous splenic embolization (PSE) and splenectomy as approaches to treating cases of traumatic splenic rupture (TSR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible articles published throughout August 2023 were identified. Endpoints compared between PSE and splenectomy patient groups included operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, duration of hospitalization, postoperative complication rates, and measures of immune function. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, involving 474 and 520 patients in the PSE and splenectomy groups respectively, were incorporated into this meta-analysis. As compared to the splenectomy group, individuals treated via PSE exhibited a significant reduction in pooled operative time (p < 0.00001) and hospitalization duration (p < 0.00001), with corresponding reductions in rates of intraoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.00001), total complications (p < 0.0001), incisional infection (p < 0.0001), ileus (p = 0.0004), and abdominal infection (p = 0.02). The immune status of these PSE group patients was also improved, as evidenced by significantly higher pooled CD4+ (30 days), CD4+/CD8+ (30 days), and CD3+ (30 days) values (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to splenectomy, PSE-based TSR treatment can significantly reduce operative time, rate of postoperative complications, and incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage, while improving post-procedural immune functionality.

Partial splenic embolization with embosphere microspheres (700-900 µm) for the treatment of hypersplenism: comparison of selective superior splenic artery embolization and inferior splenic artery embolization.

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of superior versus inferior splenic artery embolization in partial splenic embolization (PSE) and identify predictors of major complications. Material and methods: This retrospective case-control study included 73 patients who underwent PSE between May 2005 and April 2021. They were divided into two groups: the superior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group A, n = 37) and the inferior and middle splenic artery embolization group (Group B, n = 36). Outcome differences and major complications between the groups were assessed. Logistic regression was used to analyze potential predictors of major complications, and the optimal cutoff value for splenic embolization rates was determined using the Youden index. Results: There were no significant differences in laboratory and radiological outcomes between the two groups. Group A had a significantly lower incidence of major complications than Group B (p = 0.049), a lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain (p = 0.036), and a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.022). Independent risk factors for major complications included inferior and middle splenic artery embolization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.672; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.028-13.120; p = 0.045) and a higher spleen embolization rate (OR = 1.108; 95% CI = 1.003-1.224; p = 0.044). The optimal cutoff for spleen embolization rate to predict major complications was 59.93% (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 63.6%). Conclusion: Using 500-700 µm microspheres for PSE, targeting the middle and superior splenic artery yields similar effects to targeting the middle and inferior artery, but results in lower rates of major complications and shorter hospital stays. To effectively minimize the risk of major complications, the embolization rate should be kept below 59.93%, regardless of the target vessel.

Partial splenic embolization as a rescue and emergency treatment for portal hypertension and gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Partial splenic embolization (PSE) is a non-surgical procedure which was initially used to treat hypersplenism. Furthermore, partial splenic embolization can be used for the treatment of different conditions, including gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage. Here, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of emergency and non-emergency PSE in patients with gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage and recurrent portal hypertensive gastropathy bleeding due to cirrhotic (CPH) and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). METHODS: From December 2014 to July 2022, twenty-five patients with persistent esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH) and gastric variceal hemorrhage (GVH), recurrent EVH and GVH, controlled EVH with a high risk of recurrent bleeding, controlled GVH with a high risk of rebleeding, and portal hypertensive gastropathy due to CPH and NCPH underwent emergency and non-emergency PSE. PSE for treatment of persistent EVH and GVH was defined as emergency PSE. In all patients pharmacological and endoscopic treatment alone had not been sufficient to control variceal bleeding, and the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was contraindicated, not reasonable due to portal hemodynamics, or TIPS failure with recurrent esophageal bleeding had occurred. The patients were followed-up for six months. RESULTS: All twenty-five patients, 12 with CPH and 13 with NCPH were successfully treated with PSE. In 13 out of 25 (52%) patients, PSE was performed under emergency conditions due to persistent EVH and GVH, clearly stopping the bleeding. Follow-up gastroscopy showed a significant regression of esophageal and gastric varices, classified as grade II or lower according to Paquet's classification after PSE in comparison to grade III to IV before PSE. During the follow-up period, no variceal re-bleeding occurred, neither in patients who were treated under emergency conditions nor in patients with non-emergency PSE. Furthermore, platelet count increased starting from day one after PSE, and after one week, thrombocyte levels had improved significantly. After six months, there was a sustained increase in the thrombocyte count at significantly higher levels. Fever, abdominal pain, and an increase in leucocyte count were transient side effects of the procedure. Severe complications were not observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first study analyzing the efficacy of emergency and non-emergency PSE for the treatment of gastroesophageal hemorrhage and recurrent portal hypertensive gastropathy bleeding in patients with CPH and NCPH. We show that PSE is a successful rescue therapy for patients in whom pharmacological and endoscopic treatment options fail and the placement of a TIPS is contraindicated. In critically ill CPH and NCPH patients with fulminant gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, PSE showed good results and is therefore an effective tool for the rescue and emergency management of gastroesophageal hemorrhage.

Efficacy and safety of heparin plus dexamethasone after partial splenic embolization for liver cirrhosis with massive splenomegaly.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of low-molecular-weight heparin + dexamethasone after partial splenic embolization in cirrhotic patients with massive splenomegaly. METHODS: This study included 116 patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with massive splenomegaly who underwent PSE in Union Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019, and they met the criteria. They were divided into two groups: PSE + Hep + Dex group (N = 54) and PSE group (N = 62). We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the efficacy and safety of the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The volume of splenic embolization was 622.34 ± 157.06 cm3 in the PSE + Hep + DEX group and 587.62 ± 175.33 cm3 in the PSE group (P = 0.306). There was no statistically difference in the embolization rate of the spleen between the two groups (P = 0.573). WBC peaked 1 week after PSE and PLT peaked 1 month after PSE in both groups; it gradually decreased later, but was significantly higher than the preoperative level during the 12-month follow-up period. The incidences of abdominal pain (46.3% vs 66.1%, P = 0.039), fever (38.9% vs 75.8%, P < 0.001), PVT (1.9% vs 12.9%, P = 0.026), refractory ascites (5.6% vs 19.4%, P = 0.027) were lower in the PSE + Hep + DEX group than in the PSE group. The VAS score of abdominal pain in PSE group was higher than that in PSE + Hep + DEX group on postoperative days 2-8 (P < 0.05). Splenic abscess occurred in 1(1.6%) patient in the PSE group and none (0.0%) in the PSE + Hep + DEX group (P = 0.349). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of dexamethasone and low-molecular-weight heparin after PSE is a safe and effective treatment strategy that can significantly reduce the incidence of complications after PSE (such as post-embolization syndrome, PVT, refractory ascites).

An updated meta-analysis of partial splenic embolization versus splenectomy in the treatment of hypersplenism due to cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of partial splenic embolization (PSE) versus splenectomy (SP) for hypersplenism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies. Stratified meta-analysis was also conducted to control the influence of confounding factors on the research results. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies comparing PSE with SP involving a total of 1849 hypersplenism patients were selected. Postoperative increased level of platelet (PLT) [mean difference (MD) = -65.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), -81.33 to -41.69; p < .00001] were better in SP than in PSE; however, PSE was associated with less operation time (MD = -53.47; 95% CI, -65.01 to -41.94; p < .00001), less intraoperative blood loss (MD = -61.58; 95% CI, -80.35 to -42.82; p < .00001), shorter hospital stay (MD = -2.98;95% CI, -4.07 to -1.88; p < .00001) and lower complication rate [odds ratio (OR) = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.90; p = .02] compared with the SP. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in postoperative increased level of white blood cells (WBC) (MD = -1.02; 95% CI, -2.16 to 0.11; p = .08) and postoperative increased level of hemoglobin (HB) (MD = -4.09; 95% CI, -14.06 to 5.88; p = .42) between PSE and SP group. CONCLUSION: PSE had similar efficacy with SP in improving postoperative PLT, WBC, and HB levels. Moreover, PSE had the advantages of less trauma and fewer complications as well as faster recovery when compared with SP. Therefore, we tended to be cautious about SP and considered that patients with hypersplenism might benefit more from PSE.

Quantitative splenic embolization possible: application of 8Spheres conformal microspheres in partial splenic embolization (PSE).

BACKGROUND: To investigate the safety and efficacy of 8Spheres in partial splenic embolization. To explore the possibility of accurate control of splenic embolic volume by quantifying the number of microspheres used during PSE. METHOD: The data of 179 patients who underwent PSE were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: 300-500 um microsphere group (N = 83) and 500-700 um microsphere group (N = 96). The spleen volume before PSE, infarct volume and infarct rate of the spleen after PSE, changes in peripheral blood cells after PSE, postoperative adverse events and incidence of infection were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 300-500 um group vs 500-700 um group: postoperative spleen volume (cm3): 753.82 ± 325.41 vs 568.65 ± 298.16 (P = 0.008); spleen embolization volume (cm3): 525.93 ± 118.29 vs 630.26 ± 109.71 (P = 0.014); spleen embolization rate: 41.1 ± 12.3% vs 52.4 ± 10.1% (P = 0.021). Leukocytes and platelets were significantly increased after PSE in both groups; leukocyte, 1 month: 4.13 ± 0.91 vs 5.08 ± 1.16 (P = 0.026); 3 months: 4.08 ± 1.25 vs 4.83 ± 0.98 (P = 0.022); platelet, 1 month: 125.6 ± 20.3 vs 138.7 ± 18.4 (P = 0.019); 3 months: 121.8 ± 16.9 vs 134.3 ± 20.1 (P = 0.017). Incidence of abdominal pain after PSE, 72 (86.7%) vs 69 (71.9%), P = 0.027. The incidence of other adverse events and infections after PSE was not statistically different. CONCLUSION: PSE with 8Spheres is safe and effective. The use of 500-700 um microsphere for PSE can make the increase of peripheral blood cells more stable. Each vial of 8Spheres corresponds to a certain volume of splenic embolization, so it is possible to achieve quantitative embolization in PSE.

Partial splenic embolization is superior to intravenous somatostatin for decreasing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients: a dynamic self-controlled cohort study.

AIMS: The efficacy of somatostatin in altering splanchnic hemodynamics in cirrhotic portal hypertension is still controversial. We aimed to establish the dynamic effect of somatostatin on portal pressure in cirrhotic patients and compared its effect with Partial Splenic Embolization (PSE). METHODS: Eighteen patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension were prospectively recruited. The wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) and free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) were repeatedly measured at baseline, 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-min after initiating somatostatin infusion. After somatostatin infusion cessation and washout, WHVP and FHVP were measured before and after PSE. The change in all the variables between time points was analyzed. RESULTS: Decreased hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) 5-min after initiation of infusion was identified compared with baseline level (19.6%; p-value: .042), which was achieved through elevated FHVP (37.5%; p-value: 9.26e - 04). There was no significant decrease in WHVP at any time point during somatostatin infusion. The HVPG (17.4%; p-value: 1.27e - 04) and WHVP (10.4%; p-value: 3.00e - 03) post-PSE significantly decreased compared to the washout level. No significant distribution differences in the number of patients with HVPG decrease by a percentage relative to the baseline level were identified between the 5-min time point and post-PSE. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that somatostatin administration does not decrease WHVP within 20 min at clinically recommended doses. While somatostatin did decrease HVPG, this effect was achieved through increased FHVP, providing a possible explanation for its unclear efficacy. In contrast, PSE decreases both the WHVP and the HVPG.

Significant improvement in portal-systemic liver failure symptoms and successful management of portal-splenic venous hemodynamics by the combination of interventional radiology and pharmacotherapy.

This study describes a case of hepatitis C virus-related decompensated cirrhosis with portal-systemic liver failure and refractory encephalopathy. It was successfully managed with a combination of interventional radiology and pharmacotherapy, to improve hepatic function, including hyperammonemia and to control portal-splenic venous hemodynamics with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring. A man in his late 50s presented with a Child-Pugh score of 13, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score of 19 and blood ammonia level of 185 µg/dL. He underwent balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) followed by partial splenic embolization (PSE) and non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) administration. BRTO induced drastic changes in the portal-splenic venous hemodynamics, resulting in dramatically improved hepatic function and reduced hyperammonemia. However, the procedure resulted in increased HVPG from 13.6 mmHg at baseline to 23.5 mmHg at 1-month post-BRTO, accompanied by ascites retention and development of portal hypertensive gastropathy. Thereafter, PSE was performed, followed by NSBB administration, to control the elevated portal venous pressure following BRTO. Postoperatively, the patient's ascites and portal hypertensive gastrophy improved after splenic artery embolization, which eventually disappeared after the additional administration of NSBBs 1 month later. The HVPG finally decreased to 16.9 mmHg; the Child-Pugh score, MELD-Na score and blood ammonia level improved to 7, 11 and 22 µg/dL, respectively, after all therapies. BRTO significantly improved the symptoms of portal-systemic liver failure with refractory encephalopathy. PSE and NSBB administration could contribute to additional amelioration of hepatic function and successful management of complications induced by portal hemodynamic changes following BRTO.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Partial Splenic Embolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Thrombocytopenia Who Underwent Transarterial Chemoembolization.

BACKGROUND: Performing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is difficult with the occurrence of thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with TACE in patients with HCC with severe thrombocytopenia related to splenomegaly. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study consisting of 18 HCC patients with severe thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 109/L) who underwent PSE concurrently with TACE (PSE group) and 72 controls who underwent TACE alone (non-PSE group). RESULTS: Mean platelet counts at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years after concurrent PSE and TACE significantly increased compared with baseline (all P < 0.05), whereas the platelet count did not significantly increase after TACE alone. In addition, the platelet count at several time points after treatment in the PSE group was significantly higher than that in the non-PSE group, although the baseline platelet count in the PSE group was significantly lower than that in the non-PSE group. The platelet increase after PSE significantly reduced the need for platelet transfusions (P = 0.040) and enabled the subsequent TACE procedures in time (P = 0.046). The leukocyte counts and hemoglobin concentrations after concurrent PSE and TACE were also significantly increased, without deterioration of Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and unexpected side effects. CONCLUSION: PSE combined with TACE is effective in inducing and maintaining long-term thrombocytopenia improvement which reduces the need for the platelet transfusion and helps to perform initial and serial TACE, and is well-tolerated in patients with HCC and thrombocytopenia. PSE may be a promising treatment option for HCC patients with severe thrombocytopenia associated with splenomegaly who will undergo TACE.

Long-term efficacy of partial splenic embolization for the treatment of steroid-resistant chronic immune thrombocytopenia.

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists have been recently introduced for a second-line treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Splenectomy has tended to be avoided because of its complications, but the response rate of splenectomy is 60-80% and it has still been considered for steroid-refractory ITP. We performed partial splenic embolization (PSE) as an alternative to splenectomy. Between 1988 and 2013, 91 patients with steroid-resistant ITP underwent PSE at our hospital, and we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and long-term outcomes of PSE. The complete response rate (CR, platelets > 100 × 109/L) was 51% (n = 46), and the overall response rate (CR plus response (R), > 30 × 109/L) was 84% (n = 76). One year after PSE, 70% of patients remained CR and R. The group with peak platelet count after PSE ≥ 300 × 109/L (n = 29) exhibited a significantly higher platelet count than the group with platelet count < 300 × 109/L (n = 40) at any time point after PSE. The failure-free survival (FFS) rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 78, 56, and 52%, respectively. Second PSE was performed in 20 patients who relapsed (n = 14) or had no response to the initial PSE (n = 6), and the overall response was achieved in 63% patients. There were no PSE-related deaths. These results indicate that PSE is a safe and effective alternative therapy to splenectomy for patients with steroid-resistant ITP as it generates long-term, durable responses.

Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of prolonged thrombocytopenia due to hypersplenism in metastatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypersplenism-related thrombocytopenia (HST) may delay or preclude chemotherapy. Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been used at our center to overcome prolonged HST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and April 2015, 11 PSE procedures were performed in 10 patients; 9 had metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 had widespread pancreatic cancer. PSE was performed by selective catheterization of the splenic artery followed by injection of embolic particles, ranging from 300-700 um, until a 50% reduction in the splenic parenchyma blush was achieved. RESULTS: Splenomegaly was evaluated by splenic index, mean value 970 cm3 (range, 358-2277 cm3), normal mean 120-480 cm3. Mean platelet count immediately prior to PSE was 64.5 K/UL (range, 17-104 K/UL); within 10-14 days following the procedure, it increased to 224 K/UL (range, 83-669 K/UL). Only one patient's count remained less than 100 K/UL 2 weeks after embolization. After the procedure, all patients complained of mild abdominal pain that lasted for a few days; one patient developed post-embolization syndrome. No other significant complications were observed. Mean hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 2-5 days). Chemotherapy was resumed 7-53 days (mean, 18 days) after the procedure in nine patients. One patient did not receive chemotherapy; he underwent local treatment of liver metastasis. Prolonged thrombocytopenia recurred in four patients, one of whom was successfully retreated by PSE. CONCLUSIONS: PSE can be considered as a treatment option for HST.

Partial splenic embolization for thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis: predictive factors for platelet increment and risk factors for major complications.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictors of platelet increment and risk factors for major complications after partial splenic embolization (PSE) in cirrhosis. METHODS: Between March 2010 and June 2012, 52 cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia underwent PSE. Multiple variables were analyzed to identify the correlated factors affecting platelet increment and major complications after PSE. RESULTS: Linear mixed model analysis indicated the splenic infarction ratio (P < 0.001), non-infarcted splenic volume (P = 0.012), and cholinesterase level (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the platelet increment after PSE. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off values of the splenic infarction ratio, and non-infarcted splenic volume for achieving an increment of ≥60.0 × 10(9)/L in platelet counts at 1 year after PSE were 64.3% and 245.8 mL, respectively. After PSE, eight patients developed major complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated major complications were significantly associated with the infarcted splenic volume (P = 0.024) and Child-Pugh score (P = 0.018). In ROC analysis, the cut-off values of these two factors for discriminating the uncomplicated and complicated were 513.1 mL and 9.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The platelet increment after PSE depends on the splenic infarction ratio, non-infarcted splenic volume and cholinesterase level. But a large infarcted splenic volume and a high Child-Pugh score may cause complications. KEY POINTS: • The platelet increment after PSE greatly depends on the splenic infarction ratio. • The non-infarcted splenic volume significantly affects the efficacy of PSE. • A high cholinesterase level contributes to the improvement of thrombocytopenia after PSE. • The non-infarcted splenic volume significantly affects the relapse of hypersplenism. • Complications are significantly associated with the infarcted splenic volume and Child-Pugh score.

Partial splenic embolization of patients with hypersplenism by transradial or transfemoral approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Partial splenic artery embolization (PSE) is an effective treatment modality for patients with hypersplenism. It is less invasive and has a quicker recovery compared with surgical procedures. PSE is usually performed using a femoral artery approach that requires bedrest for a few hours, which is rarely the case for transradial PSE. PURPOSE: To compare the transradial and transfemoral approaches for embolization of spleen in patients with hypersplenism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 84 patients with hypersplenism who required PSE were recruited. They were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of the procedure followed: the transradial approach (R-PSE, n = 39) or transfemoral approach (F-PSE, n = 45). Technical success, puncture rate, total procedure time, X-ray exposure time, length of stay in hospital (LOS), and complications of the two groups were recorded. RESULTS: The procedure time, X-ray exposure time, and LOS were found to be lower in the R-PSE group than in the F-PSE. However, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The transradial artery approach for PSE in patients with hypersplenism is feasible with no major complications as compared to the femoral approach.

A Comparative Study of Surgical Splenectomy, Partial Splenic Embolization, and High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Hypersplenism.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy, which represent the traditional, mature, and newest methods for improving thrombocytopenia in hypersplenism, respectively. METHODS: A total of 69 patients with hypersplenism were treated with surgical splenectomy (n = 31), HIFU (n = 26), or partial splenic embolization (n = 12). They were followed closely for at least 6 months, and the effectiveness of the treatments was compared. RESULTS: Among the 3 groups, splenectomy was the most effective treatment for increasing peripheral blood cells. Embolization reduced the operating time and hospital stay, but HIFU was relatively safer and less invasive than the other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity focused ultrasound has wide clinical indications for hypersplenism and may be safer than other treatment methods. Therefore, it is a good alternative procedure for patients with a high surgical risk.

Nationwide survey in Japan regarding splenectomy/partial splenic embolization for interferon treatment targeting hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease in patients with low platelet count.

AIM: In chronic liver disease associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV), a low platelet count is a major obstacle in carrying out interferon (IFN) treatment. We used a questionnaire to clarify the extent to which splenectomy/partial splenic embolization (PSE) is performed before IFN treatment, as well as the efficacy and complications thereof. METHODS: Two questionnaires were distributed to 413 medical institutes in Japan specializing in the treatment of liver diseases, and responses were obtained from 204 institutes. Furthermore, a more detailed questionnaire was completed by 10 institutes that experienced cases of death. RESULTS: In patients with HCV genotype 1b and a high viral load (HCV1b/High), the sustained viral response (SVR) rate was 28% for the splenectomy group and 22% for the PSE group, with no significant difference between these groups. In patients that were not HCV1b/High, the SVR rate was higher in those that underwent splenectomy (71%) compared to the PSE group (56%; P = 0.025). There were cases of death in seven of 799 splenectomy cases (0.89%) and four of 474 PSE cases (0.84%). Infectious diseases were involved in nine of 11 cases of death, with a peculiar patient background of Child-Pugh B (6/10) and an age of 60 years or greater (7/11). CONCLUSION: The application of splenectomy/PSE before IFN treatment should be avoided in patients with poor residual hepatic function and/or elderly patients. In HCV1b/High patients, splenectomy/PSE should be performed only after selecting those in which IFN treatment should be highly effective.

Concurrent partial splenic embolization with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma can maintain hepatic functional reserve.

AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently complicated with cirrhosis, and it is not unusual for treatment options to be limited as a result of pancytopenia due to hypersplenism. Partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been performed for thrombocytopenia resulting from hypersplenism. We studied the efficacy in terms of hepatic functional reserve and safety in patients who underwent concurrent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with PSE for HCC. METHODS: The study population consisted of 101 HCC patients with thrombocytopenia. Fifty-three patients were treated with concurrent TACE/PSE (PSE group), and the remaining 48 TACE patients without PSE (non-PSE group) were investigated hepatic functional reserve. RESULTS: Platelet counts were significantly higher in the PSE group after 2 weeks, 2 months and 6 months after TACE than the non-PSE group. Child-Pugh score significantly deteriorated from 7.13 ± 1.16 to 7.60 ± 1.20 at 2 weeks, to 7.71 ± 1.25 at 2 months, and 7.71 ± 1.35 at 6 weeks after TACE in the non-PSE group. Hence, it worsened from 7.04 ± 1.05 to 7.21 ± 0.99 at 2 weeks temporally, but improved to 7.00 ± 1.17 after 2 months and 6.70 ± 1.16 at 6 weeks after TACE in the PSE group. CONCLUSION: Thrombocytopenia has been improved and treatment continued using concurrent PSE. In addition, hepatic functional reserve could be maintained even after treatment for HCC. Concurrent TACE and PSE for HCC with thrombocytopenia can be expected to help maintain hepatic reserve, and may contribute to improving the prognosis of HCC.

Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Repeated Partial Splenic Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hypersplenism and Thrombocytopenia.

Aim: Partial splenic embolization (PSE) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been reported in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhotic hypersplenism and thrombocytopenia. However, efficacy and safety of repeated PSE when required are unclear. This study aims to investigate post-procedural changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of HCC patients with hypersplenism received TACE and repeated PSE compared to those received TACE alone. Methods: This retrospective study included 102 HCC patients with hypersplenism who received TACE (n = 73) or TACE+PSE (n = 29) from January 2014 to December 2021. Changes in peripheral blood cell and hepatic function were investigated at 1 week, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. TACE procedure sessions and adverse events were recorded. PFS and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: Despite response to initial PSE being limited, repeated PSE increased platelet (PLT) again, which peaked at 18 months. It also continued to improve red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin, which showed significant differences in changes from baseline between two groups until 24 months, as well as Child-Pugh scores at 12 and 18 months. Mean TACE procedure sessions were significantly higher in TACE+PSE group than that in TACE alone group (4.55 vs 3.26, P = 0.019). TACE+PSE group had longer median PFS (19.4 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.023) than TACE alone group, where PSE was an independent protective factor (HR, 0.508; P = 0.014). Initial and repeated PSE showed no significant differences in safety. Conclusion: Repeated PSE is effective in increasing PLT again and improving RBC, hemoglobin and liver function. It contributed to performing serial TACE procedures thereafter. TACE combined with repeated PSE has significantly longer PFS than TACE alone, where PSE was an independent protective factor. Moreover, the safety of repeated PSE was comparable to initial PSE.

Change of skeletal muscle mass in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism after partial splenic artery embolization.

PURPOSE: Partial splenic artery embolization (PSAE) is an effective procedure for cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of PSAE on skeletal muscle, and to identify the predictor for an improvement in skeletal muscle index (SMI) in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism after PSAE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 466 cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism underwent PASE between Dec 2013 and Mar 2022. Medical records and CT images of enrolled patients were analyzed. RESULTS: 105 cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism were enrolled. Sarcopenia was observed in 60.00 % (63/105) of these patients, 68.25 % (43/63) of male patients, and 31.75 % (20/63) of female patients. In cirrhotic patients, no significant change in the mean SMI at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level after PSAE. In patients with sarcopenia, the L3 SMI increased from 36.77 cm2/m2 (baseline) to 43.38 cm2/m2 (P < 0.01), the L3 subcutaneous fat area (SFA) increased from 79.16 cm2 (baseline) to 103.52 cm2 (P < 0.01) at 12-month follow-up after PSAE. In patients without sarcopenia, the L3 SMI decreased from 58.38 cm2/m2 (baseline) to 49.44 cm2/m2 (P < 0.05), the L3 SFA increased from 89.63 cm2 (baseline) to 94.77 cm2 (P > 0.05) at 12-month follow-up after PSAE. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated splenic infarction rate (OR: 0.01, P = 0.0032) and SMI (OR: 0.84, P < 0.001) were independent predictors for an improvement in skeletal muscle in patients with sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia, an improvement in skeletal muscle and fat mass was observed after PSAE; splenic infarction rate and the L3 SMI before PSAE predicted an improvement in skeletal muscle index in patients with sarcopenia after PSAE.

Partial Splenic Embolization in a Patient with Hemophilia A and Severe Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report.

We report a patient with hemophilia A who underwent partial splenic embolization (PSE) for severe thrombocytopenia secondary to portal hypertension-induced splenomegaly, resulting in a stable long-term quality of life. The patient was diagnosed with hemophilia A and unfortunately contracted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) from blood products. He subsequently developed progressive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension from chronic HCV, resulting in severe thrombocytopenia. PSE was performed because he had occasional subcutaneous bleeding and needed to start interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) treatment for curing his HCV infection at that time. His platelet counts increased, and no serious adverse events were observed. Currently, he continues to receive outpatient treatment, regular factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy for hemophilia A, and antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection. Vascular embolization has been reported to be an effective and minimally invasive treatment for bleeding in hemophilia patients. PSE also provided him with a stable quality of life without the side effects of serious infections and thrombocytopenia relapses. We conclude that PSE is a promising therapeutic option for patients with hemophilia A.