Dementia Specialty Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Their Role in the Dementia Diagnostic Process and Diagnostic Disclosure.

BACKGROUND: Delivering a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) can be challenging not just for patients and families, but also for clinicians. Our objective was to understand dementia specialty care clinicians' perspectives on their role in diagnosis and diagnostic disclosure in dementia. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with clinicians from a specialty tertiary dementia care center focused on practices, challenges, and opportunities addressing patient and caregiver needs in dementia. Data was analyzed by an interdisciplinary team using thematic analysis. RESULTS: The 16 participants included behavioral neurologists, social workers, neuropsychologists, and nurses. Themes included the value of providing an accurate diagnosis, the timing and challenges of delivering a diagnosis, the central focus on diagnosis alongside the need for more education on care management, and the role of the interdisciplinary team. DISCUSSION: We identified areas for improvement and strengths that can be built upon or adapted to other settings, including providing clinicians in specialty and primary care settings more guidance and support when diagnostic challenges arise, strengthening interdisciplinary teamwork, and making dementia diagnosis and care more accessible.

Improving Access to Specialty Pediatric Care: Innovative Referral and eConsult Technology in a Specialized Acute Care Hospital.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated wait times for pediatric specialty care. Transformative technologies such as electronic referral (eReferral-automation of patient information) and electronic consultations (eConsult-asynchronous request for specialized advice by primary care providers) have the potential to increase timely access to specialist care. The objective of this study was to present an overview of the current state and characteristics of referrals directed to a pediatric ambulatory medical surgery center, with an emphasis on the innovative use of an eConsult system and to indicate key considerations for system improvement. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a specialized pediatric acute care hospital in Ottawa, Ontario. Secondary data were obtained over a 2-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2022). To gain insights and identify areas of improvement related to the factors pertaining to referrals and eConsults at the process and system levels, quality improvement (QI) methodologies were employed. Descriptive statistics provide a summary of the trends and characteristics of referrals and the utilization of eConsult. Results: Among the 113,790 referrals received, 31,430 were denied. Most common reasons for referral denial were other/null (e.g., unspecified) (29.3%), inappropriate referrals (12.6%), and duplicate referrals (12.4%). Four clinics (e.g., endocrinology, cardiology, neurology, and neurosurgery) reported a total of 277 eConsults, with endocrinology accounting for 95.0% of all eConsults. QI findings revealed the need for standardized workflows among specialties and ensuring that eConsult options are accessible and integrated within the electronic medical record (EMR). Conclusions: Refining the pediatric referral management process and optimizing eConsult through existing clinical systems have the potential to improve the timeliness and quality of specialty care. The results inform future research initiatives targeting improved access to pediatric specialty care and serve as a benchmark for hospitals utilizing EMRs and eConsult.

Barriers and facilitators to accessing pediatric specialty care for rural-dwelling children with complex chronic conditions: An integrative review.

PROBLEM: Pediatric specialty services are often geographically concentrated in urban areas, leaving up to 1 in 5 rural-dwelling children in the United States without access to advanced care. The purpose of this review was to identify and review extant literature related to barriers and facilitators to accessing specialty care for rural-dwelling children with complex chronic conditions. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The Whittemore and Knafl (2005) integrative review method guided the review which included a critical appraisal and analysis of relevant articles published between 2012 and 2023. SAMPLE: Twenty-three studies were identified for inclusion in the integrative review. RESULTS: Using the domains of the Levesque et al. (2013) conceptual framework, findings were categorized according to the access to care continuum. Barriers included broadband access, transportation, and inadequate care coordination. Facilitators included telehealth, social support, and outreach clinics. CONCLUSIONS: To improve access to pediatric specialty care for rural-dwelling children, nurses, physicians, and policymakers will need to consider how the social determinants of health impact the healthcare access continuum from diagnosis to continuing healthcare. IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this integrative review will aid researchers in developing interventions to improve access to pediatric specialty care for rural-dwelling children.

Novel Occupational Therapy Program (Step Up) to Facilitate the Transition from Early Intervention in Psychosis Services.

The purpose of this program evaluation was to examine preliminary outcomes associated with a novel stepdown program for clients of early intervention in psychosis services ("Step Up") that featured occupational therapy (OT) as a critical treatment component. Clients participated in Step Up for at least 6 months and were administered pre-post assessments of clinician-rated performance of daily living activities and self-perceived performance and satisfaction with daily occupational functioning. Paired samples Wilcoxon tests were used to compare outcomes across the two time points. Data from 23 participants of Step Up were analyzed. Clinician-rated performance of daily living (especially in the areas of money and time management and leisure engagement) and client-rated performance and satisfaction with daily occupational functioning improved significantly over time. Results demonstrate the promise of programs such as Step Up that capitalize on OT and promote functional outcomes during the transition from early intervention.

The Role of Proximity to Coordinated Specialty Care For Early Psychosis And Program Engagement in Washington State: The Interaction of Travel Time, Race, and Ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: Proximity to mental health services is a predictor of timely access to services. The present study sought to investigate whether travel time was associated with engagement in coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis, with specific attention to whether the interaction of travel time by race and ethnicity had differential impact. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Data collected between 2019 and 2022 as part of the New Journeys evaluation, the CSC model in Washington State. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study included a sample of 225 service users with first episode psychosis (FEP) who had received services from New Journeys. DATA COLLECTION: Service users' addresses, and the physical location of CSC were geocoded. Spatial proximity was calculated as travel time in minutes. Scheduled appointments, attendance and program status were captured monthly by clinicians as part of the New Journeys measurement battery. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Proximity was significantly associated with the number of appointments scheduled and attended, and program status (graduation/completion and disengagement). Among Hispanic service users with spatial proximity further away from CSC (longer commutes) was associated with a lower likelihood of graduating/completing CSC compared to non-Hispanic service users (p = .04). Non-white services users had a higher risk of disengagement from CSC compared to white service users (p = .03); additionally, the effects of spatial proximity on disengagement were amplified for non-White service users (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that proximity is associated with program engagement and partially explains potential differences in program status among ethnoracial group.

Association of primary care visit length with outpatient utilization, continuity, and care processes.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how variation in the scheduled length of primary care visits can impact patients' patterns of health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how the scheduled length of in-person visits with primary care physicians (PCPs) was associated with PCP and patient characteristics, outpatient utilization, and preventive care receipt. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined data from a large American academic health system. PCP visit length template was defined as either 15- and 30-min scheduled appointments (i.e. 15/30), or 20- and 40-min scheduled appointments (i.e. 20/40). RESULTS: Of 222 included PCPs, 85 (38.3%) used the 15/30 template and 137 (61.7%) used the 20/40 template. The 15/30 group had higher proportions of male (49.4%, vs. 35.8% in the 20/40 group) and family medicine (37.6% vs. 21.2%) physicians. In adjusted patient-level analysis (N = 238,806), having a 15/30 PCP was associated with 9% more primary care visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.14), and 8% fewer specialty care visits (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98). PCP visit length template was not associated with significant differences in obstetrics/gynaecology visits, continuity of care, or preventive care receipt. In interaction analyses, having a 15/30 PCP was associated with additional primary care visits among non-Hispanic White patients (IRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16) but not among non-Hispanic Black patients. CONCLUSION: PCPs' choices about the scheduled length of in-person visits may impact their patients' specialty care use, and have varying impacts across different racial/ethnic groups.

Predictors of relapse and engagement in care one year after ending services in an urban safety net coordinated specialty care program for first episode psychosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for relapse (psychiatric emergency department visits or hospitalization) and lack of follow-up with outpatient psychiatric care in the 12 months after ending services in an urban safety net coordinated specialty care (CSC) program for first episode psychosis (FEP). METHODS: The study population (n = 143) were individuals with FEP who had any CSC care between 2014 and 2021. To identify risk factors for relapse and follow up after exit, multivariable logistic regression was performed using data from electronic health records and linked insurance claims data. RESULTS: Individuals with any emergency department visit or hospitalization 12 months prior to ending CSC (aOR = 4.69, 95 % CI 1.78-12.34) and those who were using cannabis at last CSC contact (aOR = 4.06, 95 % CI 1.56-10.56) had a higher risk of relapse after ending CSC services. Cannabis use at last contact was also associated with lower rates of outpatient psychiatric follow-up (aOR = 0.32, 95 % CI 0.12-0.94), while CSC duration in months had a small positive association with post-CSC psychiatric follow-up. There were no differences in relapse or follow-up by race or ethnicity, primary diagnosis, or medication usage. CONCLUSIONS: Prior relapse during CSC predicted relapse in the 12 months after ending CSC services, but not outpatient follow up. Cannabis use predicted both a higher rate of relapse and a lower rate of follow up after ending services. There were no differences by race or ethnicity in our sample, suggesting that once individuals engaged in FEP care there were no evident disparities in the observed outcomes.

Over 30 years of STEP: The Pittsburgh experience with first-episode psychosis.

AIMS: For over 30 years, combined research and treatment settings in the US have been critical to conceptualizing care for first-episode psychosis (FEP). Here we describe an early example of such a context, the Services for the Treatment of Early Psychosis (STEP) clinic, which is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh. METHODS: We describe STEP's historical roots and establishment in the early 1990s; STEP's research and treatment contributions, alongside its growth and ongoing leadership. RESULTS: Research-based clinics, like STEP, preceded and helped pave the way for the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode project in the US and the ensuing Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) approach, now widely adopted in the US. Early clinic-based research at STEP helped establish protocols for psychopharmacology, the relevance of effective early treatment, including psychosocial approaches, and highlighted disparities in treatment outcomes across race/ethnicity. Multidisciplinary collaboration and dialogue with consumers contributed to early treatment, combining psychosocial and pharmacological approaches. STEP adopted CSC and is situated within a bi-state Learning Health System. STEP has retained a relatively unique 5-year treatment model and exists within continuum of care ideally suited to studying psychotic illness and treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: STEP remains the largest academic FEP clinic in Pennsylvania. Academic FEP clinics like STEP will have a critical role within Learning Health Systems nationally to model participatory approaches, sustain early intervention treatment quality and ongoing treatment developments.

Reasons for Discharge in a National Network of Early Psychosis Intervention Programs.

BACKGROUND: Discharge from early psychosis intervention is a critical stage of treatment that may occur for a variety of reasons. This study characterizes reasons for discharge among participants in early psychosis intervention programs participating in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) which comprises >100 programs in the United States organized under 8 academic hubs. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 1787 discharges, focusing on program completion, unilateral termination by the client/family, and lost contact with the client/family. We performed exploratory analyses of demographic, clinical, and functional predictors of discharge reason. Variables predictive of discharge type were included in multilevel logistic regressions, allowing for the estimation of predictors of discharge reason and variability in rates by program and hub. STUDY RESULTS: An estimated 20%-30% of enrolled patients completed the program. Program completion rates were higher among participants who were older on admission, had lower negative symptoms severity, spent more time in education, employment, or training, and who were covered by private insurance (a close proxy for socioeconomic status). Programs were more likely to lose contact with male participants, Black participants, and participants who were never covered by private insurance. After accounting for patient-level factors, there was substantial program-level variation in all 3 discharge outcomes, and hub-level variability in the proportion of participants who completed the program. The impact of race on program completion varied substantially by program. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were discharged from early psychosis intervention services for diverse reasons, some of which were associated with sociocultural factors. Disengagement is a widespread problem affecting all hubs.

Experience Curve With the Cone Procedure for Ebstein's Anomaly: Effect on Cost and Resource Utilization.

Background: The volume-outcome relationship is well-known in health care. The Experience Curve, initially developed by the Boston Consulting Group for manufacturing, offers insight on this relationship and has never before been applied to health care. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of experience on cost and resource utilization for the Cone procedure. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent Cone reconstruction for Ebstein's anomaly at Boston Children's Hospital between October 2010 and October 2021. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross clamp time over time were evaluated using exponential regression to assess the surgeon-level learning curve. At the hospital level, length of stay and cost over time were assessed using exponential regression. Results: There were 115 patients included in the study. Median hospital length of stay was 7.9 days (IQR: 6.4-10.2 days) with a decline of 3.3% per year. Median intensive care unit [ICU] length of stay was 3.2 days (IQR: 2-5.7 days) with a decline of 10.5% per year. Adjusted direct costs indexed to 2020 prices fell by 4% per year. There was no statistically significant change in cardiopulmonary bypass or aortic cross clamp time. In mediation analysis, the reduction in cost was completely accounted for in the decline in ICU length of stay. ICU length of stay was correlated with duration of intubation. Conclusions: Increasing familiarity with Ebstein's anomaly and Cone reconstruction led to a reduction in resource utilization.

Implementation support for the data-driven components of care in a multisite network of coordinated specialty care programs.

Beyond training providers prior to the roll-out of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for first-episode psychosis in clinical settings, implementation support for data-informed care remains an area that has received very little attention. The current paper describes the development and refinement of implementation support for the data-driven components of care in the New Journeys network, Washington State's CSC model for psychosis, comprised of 14 CSC programs. Using the Evidence-Based System for Innovation Support Logic Model, this paper outlines the individual components for implementation support, tools, training, technical assistance, and quality improvement/evaluation that have been developed for the New Journeys network. We present examples of modifications that have occurred over nine years to address the needs of clients, providers, and state-level network administrators to facilitate the data-driven components of care. We conclude with recommendations based on lessons learned in Washington State aimed at improving implementation of data-driven care in CSC models throughout the USA.

The purpose of this work was to outline the development and strategies used to provide implementation support for the data-driven components of coordinated specialty care programs for early psychosis. We describe the individual use of tools, training, technical assistance, and quality improvement, and how these strategies are used collectively. Based on detailed notes from meetings and correspondence from providers and state-level administrators we present modifications that have occurred to address barriers and needs, essentially using quantitative and qualitative data to inform quality improvement. We then present lessons learned that could be helpful for existing and new coordinated specialty care networks.

Needs for Successful Engagement in Telemedicine Among Rural Older US Veterans and Their Caregivers: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is an important option for rural older adults who often must travel far distances to clinics or forgo essential care. In 2014, the Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (GRECC) of the US Veterans Health Administration (VA) established a national telemedicine network called GRECC Connect. This network increased access to geriatric specialty care for the 1.4 million rural VA-enrolled veterans aged 65 years or older. The use of telemedicine skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionately impacted older adults, exacerbating disparities in specialty care access as overburdened systems shut down in-person services. This surge presented a unique opportunity to study the supports necessary for those who would forgo telemedicine if in-person care were available. OBJECTIVE: In spring 2021, we interviewed veterans and their informal caregivers to (1) elicit their experiences attempting to prepare for a video visit with a GRECC Connect geriatric specialist and (2) explore facilitators and barriers to successful engagement in a telemedicine visit. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative evaluation with patients and their caregivers who agreed to participate in at least 1 GRECC Connect telemedicine visit in the previous 3 months. A total of 30 participants from 6 geographically diverse GRECC Connect hub sites agreed to participate. Semistructured interviews were conducted through telephone or the VA's videoconference platform for home telemedicine visits (VA Video Connect) per participant preference. We observed challenges and, when needed, provided real-time technical support to facilitate VA Video Connect use for interviews. All interviews were recorded with permission and professionally transcribed. A team of 5 researchers experienced in qualitative research analyzed interview transcripts using rapid qualitative analysis. RESULTS: From 30 participant interviews, we identified the following 4 categories of supports participants described regarding successful engagement in telemedicine, as defined by visit completion, satisfaction, and willingness to engage in telemedicine in the future: (1) caregiver presence to facilitate technology setup and communication; (2) flexibility in visit modality (eg, video from home or a clinic or telephone); (3) technology support (eg, determining device compatibility or providing instruction and on-demand assistance); and (4) assurance of comfort with web-based communication, including orientation to features like closed captioning. Supports were needed at multiple points before the visit, and participants stressed the importance of eliciting the varying needs and preferences of each patient-caregiver dyad. Though many initially agreed to a telemedicine visit because of pandemic-related clinic closures, participants were satisfied with telemedicine and willing to use it for other types of health care visits. CONCLUSIONS: To close gaps in telemedicine use among rural older adults, supports must be tailored to individuals, accounting for technology availability and comfort, as well as availability of and need for caregiver involvement. Comprehensive scaffolding of support starts well before the first telemedicine visit.

Observed Trajectories of Cannabis Use and Concurrent Longitudinal Outcomes in Youth and Young Adults Receiving Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.

Cannabis use is present and persistent in young adults with early psychosis receiving Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) in the United States. While CSC programs are effective in improving quality of life, helping individuals reach goals, and promoting recovery, cannabis use may limit the extent of these improvements. This study extended upon previous findings to examine trajectories of cannabis use among individuals with early psychosis. The sample consisted of 1325 CSC participants enrolled for more than one year at OnTrackNY and followed up to two years, categorized into three groups: no use, reduced use, and persistent use. Baseline demographic and clinical differences were compared across groups and associations between clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 12 months and 24 months were examined across groups. Of the sample, 40 % remained persistent users over two years while 12.8 % reduced their use. At baseline, persistent users were younger (p = 0.011), more likely to be male (p < 0.001), had lower education levels (p = 0.019), and were more likely to have had past legal issues prior to admission (p < 0.001) than non-users. At 2 years, persistent users had significantly worse symptom scores than non-users (p = 0.0003) and reduced users (p = 0.0004). These findings highlight the presence of persistent cannabis use being common in this population and the need to improve substance use treatment offered to allow more CSC participants to achieve improved outcomes.

Hospitalization and help-seeking among first episode psychosis patients.

PURPOSE: To examine hospitalization as part of a complex pathway to care in first episode psychosis (FEP), exploring help-seeking episodes (HSE) and their relationship to hospitalization. METHODS: Data from 66 patients at the Early Psychosis Intervention Clinic New Orleans (EPIC-NOLA), a coordinated specialty care (CSC) clinic, was obtained from Pathways to Care (PTC) assessments, which documents elements of help seeking. A chart review was performed identifying hospitalizations. RESULTS: Most patients were hospitalized multiple times (n = 37, M = 2.98, SD = 2.14). On average, patients had more hospitalizations prior to starting treatment at EPIC-NOLA (M = 1.72, SD = 1.35) than after (M = 1.27, SD = 1.79). Patients whose first HSE resulted in intake at EPIC-NOLA were significantly less likely to be hospitalized after intake than patients with multiple HSE (F(1,52.3) = 12.9, p < .001). There was a significant correlation (N = 42) between HSE and hospitalizations after intake (τb = .327 p < .05); patients seeking help more often were more likely to be hospitalized after intake. No significant correlations were found between duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and hospitalization. CONCLUSION: While results are correlational, several key relationships were noted. Fewer hospitalizations occurred after intake into EPIC-NOLA. Starting treatment after the first HSE was related to fewer future hospitalizations, compared to intake after multiple HSEs. Intake into a CSC clinic after a single HSE may reduce hospitalization. Additionally, increased HSE, not DUP, impacted patients' likelihood of hospitalization. This prompts treatment engagement during a first HSE to reduce hospitalization.

Identifying Individuals With Early Psychosis in Jail: Lessons Learned for Coordinated Specialty Care Services.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to establish the feasibility of a two-component intervention embedded within a jail setting that would detect detainees with early psychosis and connect them to coordinated specialty care (CSC) in the community upon release. METHODS: The two components of the intervention were a targeted educational campaign for correction officers and a specialized early engagement support service to facilitate jail discharge planning. Jail detainees with early psychosis were referred to the project and assessed for positive and negative symptoms, substance use, and duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). During a 24-month period, 25 individuals were referred, of whom eight were eligible and interviewed. RESULTS: The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the jail detainees were similar to those of individuals in hospital settings. The median DUP was 36 weeks. One of the eight detainees with early psychosis was successfully referred to CSC; for the other detainees, social or criminal legal factors precluded referral. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted educational campaign for correction officers and a specialized early engagement support service can be implemented in a jail setting, and referrals can be facilitated. Success of the campaign may depend on having dedicated liaisons within the jail setting (e.g., among correctional health staff) as well as liaisons in local CSC programs and leadership. Changes in the law and policy environments (e.g., criminal legal system reform) and changes in organizational practices and processes for corrections, correctional health, and local CSC programs (such as those made during the COVID-19 pandemic) require ongoing collaborations.

Reimbursement for a Broader Array of Services in Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.

Despite the growing evidence supporting the benefits of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis, access to this multimodal, evidence-based program in the United States has been hindered by a lack of funding for core CSC services and activities. The recent approval of team-based reimbursement codes by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has the potential to fund substantially more CSC services for clients with insurance coverage that accepts the new team-based billing codes. This streamlined and more inclusive billing strategy may reduce administrative burden and support the financial viability of CSC programs.

From Rhetoric to Action: Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Coordinated Specialty Care for Early Psychosis.

Attention to inclusivity and equity in health research and clinical practice has grown in recent years; however, coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis lags in efforts to improve equity despite evidence of ongoing disparities and inequities in CSC care. This Open Forum argues that marginalization and disparities in early psychosis research and clinical care are interrelated, and the authors provide suggestions for paths forward. Commitment to equity and justice demands recentering the perspectives of those most affected by early psychosis services and investing in the integration of historically excluded perspectives across all aspects of practice, policy, and research.

The pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: How far have we come?

Schizophrenia is a chronic and often severe mental disorder for which antipsychotic drugs are the cornerstone of treatment. Although the essential mechanism of action of these drugs has not changed much since they were first discovered in the 1950s, there have been numerous advances in the context in which these drugs are prescribed, as well as in the considerations for their optimal use. In this review, we summarize five selected issues in which the psychopharmacological treatment of schizophrenia has most evolved. Namely, these are the shift of outcomes of interest from symptoms to recovery, the development of stratified approaches to select the most appropriate treatment for each individual, the recognition of treatment nonadherence as a critical factor determining outcomes, the recommendations for maintenance treatment, and, finally, the promise of new antipsychotic compounds that innovate in their mechanisms of action, improving efficacy/safety profiles. Finally, we discuss how some of these advances have already delivered to improved outcomes in the real world, whereas others have demonstrated efficacy under optimal circumstances yet have not been translated into better outcomes in the community. Thus, the road ahead includes both identifying novel treatments that engage the psychopathology of the illness and improve the efficacy/tolerability profile of currently available agents, as well as developing interventions that mitigate the barriers for the use of novel interventions, some of them already existing, in the real world.