High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial).

INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up). METHODS: In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.

Treatment for paraganglioma with stereotactic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Paragangliomas (PG) are rare neoplasms of neuroendocrine origin that tend to be highly vascularized, slow-growing, and usually sporadic. To date, common treatment options are surgical resection (SR), with or without radiation therapy (RT), and a watch-and-wait approach. AIM: To evaluate the local control and effectiveness of exclusive fractionated stereotactic RT (FSRT) treatment in unresectable PG (uPG). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with uPG (medically inoperable or refused SR) treated with FSRT with a Cyberknife System (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California). Toxicity and initial efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: From May 2009 to January 2023, 6 patients with a median age of 68 (range 20-84) were treated with FSRT. The median delivered dose was 21 Gy (range 20-30 Gy) at a median isodose line of 75.5% (range 70%-76%) in 4 fractions (range 3-5 fractions). The median volume was 13.6 mL (range 12.4-65.24 mL). The median cumulative biological effective dose and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions were 70 Gy and 37.10 Gy respectively. Site of origin involved were the timpa-nojugular glomus (4/6), temporal bone, and cervical spine. In 1 of the 6 patients, the follow-up was insufficient; 5 of 6 patients showed a 5-year overall survival and 5-year progression-free survival of 100%. We observed negligible toxicities during and after RT. The majority of patients showed stable symptoms during follow-up. Only 1 patient developed spine metastases. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results on this small cohort of patients suggest that FSRT could be an effective and safe alternative to SR.

Comprehensive characterisation of the IBA myQA SRS for SRS and SBRT patient specific quality assurance.

The myQA SRS (IBA) is a new to market 2D complementary metal oxide semiconductor detector array with an active area 140 × 120 mm2 and 0.4 mm resolution, making it a potential real-time dosimetry alternative to radiochromic film for stereotactic plan verification. Characterisation of the device was completed to assess performance. The dosimetric properties of the device were assessed for 6FF and 6FFF beams from a Varian TrueBeam STx with high definition multileaf collimator. Clinical suitability of the device for Patient Specific Quality Assurance was verified using ten SRS/SBRT plans, compared against other detectors, as well as multi leaf collimator (MLC) tests including picket fence and chair. Gamma analysis was performed using myQA software with criteria of 4%/1 mm. The device demonstrated compliance with recommended specifications for basic tests. After the required warm-up period, the maximum deviation in detector signal from initial readings was 0.2%. Short-term and long-term reproducibility was 0.1% (6FF) and 1.0% (6FFF), respectively. Dose linearity was within 0.3% (6FF) and 0.7% (6FFF) and dose-rate dependence within 1.7% (6FF) and 2.9% (6FFF) and were verified with a Farmer type ionization chamber (PTW 30013). Angular dependence was quantified for coplanar and non-coplanar situations. Output factors and beam profiles measured on the device showed agreement within 1% of baseline RAZOR diode (IBA) and CC04 ionisation chamber (IBA) measurements for field sizes 1 × 1 to 10 × 10 cm2. The minimum gamma (4%/1 mm) pass rates for MLC-pattern tests were 96.5% and 98.1% for the myQA SRS and film, respectively. The average gamma (4%/1 mm) pass rates for SBRT and SRS plans were 98.8% and 99.8% respectively. This work represents one of the first studies performed on the commissioning and performance characterisation of this novel device, demonstrating its accuracy and reliability, making it highly useful as a film alternative in stereotactic treatment plan verification.

Stereotactic ultrahypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer - Acute toxicity and patient-reported outcomes in the prospective, multicenter SMILE phase II trial.

Background: Due to superior image quality and daily adaptive planning, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (MRgSBRT) has the potential to further widen the therapeutic window in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. This study reports on acute toxicity rates and patient-reported outcomes after MR-guided adaptive ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer within the prospective, multicenter phase II SMILE trial. Materials and methods: A total of 69 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent MRgSBRT with daily online plan adaptation. Inclusion criteria comprised a tumor stage ≤ T3a, serum PSA value ≤ 20 ng/ml, ISUP Grade group ≤ 4. A dose of 37.5 Gy was prescribed to the PTV in five fractions on alternating days with an optional simultaneous boost of 40 Gy to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by multiparametric MRI. Acute genitourinary (GU-) and gastrointestinal (GI-) toxicity, as defined by CTCAE v. 5.0 and RTOG as well as patient-reported outcomes according to EORTC QLQ-C30 and -PR25 scores were analyzed at completion of radiotherapy, 6 and 12 weeks after radiotherapy and compared to baseline symptoms. Results: There were no toxicity-related treatment discontinuations. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no grade 3 + toxicities were reported according to CTCAE. Up until the 12-week visit, in total 16 patients (23 %) experienced a grade 2 GU or GI toxicity. Toxicity rates peaked at the end of radiation therapy and subsided within the 12-week follow-up period. At the 12-week follow-up visit, no residual grade 2 GU toxicities were reported and 1 patient (1 %) had residual grade 2 enteritic symptoms. With exception to a significant improvement in the emotional functioning score following MRgSBRT, no clinically meaningful changes in the global health status nor in relevant subscores were reported. Conclusion: Daily online-adaptive MRgSBRT for localized prostate cancer resulted in an excellent overall toxicity profile without any major negative impact on quality of life.

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Suppresses Radioresistance in U87 Human Glioma Cells by Inhibiting Yap1 and Hsp90 Proteins.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy plays a vital role in the management of high-grade gliomas. However, the radio resistance of glioma cells limits the effect of radiation and drives recurrence inside the irradiated tumor volume leading to poor outcomes for patients. METHODS: High-grade glioma cell radioresistance significantly contributes to radiotherapy failure, highlighting the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers for radioresistance. An increasing body of evidence complies with the Yes Associated Protein 1 (Yap-1) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) as biomarkers for radioresistance in glioma cells. A number of studies suggest the potential of radioresistance-associated factors as biomarkers and/ or novel therapeutic targets in glioma cells. Thus, it is essential for glioblastoma patients to identify robust druggable targets involved in radioresistance, optimizing irradiation protocol, and understanding their underlying molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: Therefore, in the present study, we hypothesized that hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiation therapy (HF-GKRT) could target Yap-1 and Hsp90 and downregulate the mechanism of radioresistance in high-grade glioma cells. CONCLUSION: For this purpose, expression levels of radioresistance markers Yap-1 and Hsp90 were evaluated after treatment with HF-GKRT, and this was compared with single fraction Gamma Knife radiation therapy (SF-GKRT) in U87MG primary human glioblastoma cell line model. This would help design a novel radiation therapy regimen for glioblastoma patients by reducing the risk of radioresistance.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for patients with lung tumor and severe pulmonary function impairment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes after SABR in a cohort of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or pulmonary metastases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with forced expiratory volume in the first second predicted (FEV1) ≤ 50%. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study was performed to analyze clinical outcomes and toxicities in COPD patients with severe lung dysfunction treated with SABR from 1st June 2015 to 31st October 2022. RESULTS: Thirty four patients (forty locations) were enrolled for analysis. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. Median age was 73.5 years (range, 65.6-80.1). FEV1 was 38% (range, 28.2-50.0) prior to radiotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 41.1 months (95% CI 38.9-not reached). OS rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 79%, 71%, and 36%, respectively. Cancer-specific survival rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 96%, 96%, and 68%, respectively. Local control rates at 2-, 3-, and 5- years were 88%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. The most common acute toxicity was pneumonitis (38.2%), of which only 1 patient (2.9%) reported grade 3 acute toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Lung SABR in patients with poor pulmonary function may be effective with acceptable toxicity.

Initial Age and Performans Status: Predicators for Re-Irradiation Ability in Patients with Relapsed Brain Metastasis after Initial Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in cancer patients, and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a preferred treatment option. In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients treated by SRT for a single BM during their first SRT session and we compared two subgroups: "Cohort 1" with patients did not undergo cerebral re-irradiation and "Cohort 2" with patients received at least one subsequent SRT session for cerebral recurrence. METHODS: We included patients who received SRT for a single BM between January 2010 and June 2020. Cohort 1 comprised 152 patients, and Cohort 2 had 46 patients. RESULTS: Cohort 2 exhibited younger patients with higher Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Median overall survival was considerably longer in Cohort 2 (21.8 months) compared to Cohort 1 (6.1 months). Local and cerebral recurrence rates were significantly higher in Cohort 2 (p < 0.001), attributed to patient selection and longer survival. The combined score of age and KPS proved to be a predictive factor for survival, with patients under 65 years of age and KPS > 80 showing the best survival rates in the overall population. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study highlights that the combined score of age and KPS can predict better survival, especially for patients under 65 years with a KPS score above 80. Further research involving larger and more diverse populations is essential to validate and expand upon these findings.

Comparative study of dynamic conformal arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for treating single brain metastases: A retrospective analysis of dosimetric and clinical outcomes.

Background and purpose: Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is commonly used to treat brain metastases (BMs). This retrospective study compared two SRT techniques, dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for single BM treatments. Material and methods: Data of patients treated between January 2010 and June 2020 were considered. Patients with multiple BMs, resected BMs, reirradiation, whole-brain radiation therapy and brainstem metastases were excluded. We focused our analysis on 97 patients who received 23.1 Gy in three fractions. Acute toxicities and follow-up outcomes were recorded. Dosimetric data were analyzed in two subgroups (PTV ≤ 10 cc and PTV > 10 cc). Results: DCAT and VMAT were used in 70 (72.2 %) and 27 (27.8 %) patients, respectively. Acute toxicities were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.259), and no difference was detected in the incidence rate of radionecrosis, local recurrence and cerebral recurrence (p > 0.999, p > 0.999 and p = 0.682, respectively). PTV coverage was better with DCAT for small volumes (PTV ≤ 10 cc). Mean conformity index (CI) was significantly higher with VMAT and mean gradient index (GI) was significantly lower with DCAT whatever volume subgroups (p < 0.001). DCAT had more heterogeneous plans and VMAT required more monitor units. DCAT resulted in reduced low and intermediate doses, whereas VMAT led to decreased high doses. Conclusion: DCAT and VMAT are two effective and safe SRT techniques for BMs treatment. In the era of re-irradiation, it is important to reduce the doses delivered to healthy tissues. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Narrative review of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for oligometastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: present and future developments.

Background and Objective: A significant number of individuals diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have distant metastases, and the concept of oligometastatic NSCLC has shown promise in achieving a cure. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently considered a viable treatment option for a limited number of tumor metastases. It has also been demonstrated that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in extending the survival of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC. Hence, the combination of SBRT with third-generation TKIs holds the potential to enhance treatment efficacy in patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This review aimed to assess the possibility of combining SBRT with TKIs as an optimum treatment option for patients with oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Methods: We performed a narrative review by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for articles published in the English language from January 2009 to February 2024 and by reviewing the bibliographies of key references to identify important literature related to combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Key Content and Findings: This review aimed to assess the viability of combining SBRT and EGFR-TKIs in oligometastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Current clinical trials suggest that the combined therapies have better progression free survival (PFS) when using SBRT as either concurrent with EGFR-TKIs or consolidated with EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, research with third-generation EGFR-TKIs and SBRT combinations has demonstrated tolerable toxicity levels without significant additional adverse effects as compared to prior therapies. However, further clinical trials are required to establish its effectiveness. Conclusions: The combined approach of SBRT and TKIs can effectively impede the progression of oligometastatic NSCLC in patients harboring EGFR mutations and, most notably, can prolong progression-free survival rates. However, the feasibility of combining SBRT with third-generation TKIs in clinical trials remains unclear.

Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 1-brain metastasis.

Because of improved survival of cancer patients, more patients irradiated for brain metastases develop intracerebral recurrences requiring subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Five studies focused on reirradiation with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after initial WBRT for brain metastases. Following the second WBRT course, improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 31-68% of patients. Rates of neurotoxicity, such as encephalopathy or cognitive decline, were reported in two studies (1.4% and 32%). In another study, severe or unexpected adverse events were not observed. Survival following the second WBRT course was generally poor, with median survival times of 2.9-4.1 months. The survival prognosis of patients receiving two courses of WBRT can be estimated by a scoring tool considering five prognostic factors. Three studies investigated reirradiation with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) following primary WBRT. One-year local control rates were 74-91%, and median survival times ranged between 7.8 and 14 months. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation were 0-6%. Seven studies were considered that investigated re-treatment with SF-SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) following initial SF-SRS or FSRT. One-year local control rates were 60-88%, and the median survival times ranged between 8.3 and 25 months. During follow-up after reirradiation, rates of overall (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RN ranged between 12.5% and 30.4%. Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% to 23.9% of cases (patients or lesions). The risk of RN associated with symptoms and/or requiring surgery or corticosteroids appears lower after reirradiation with FSRT when compared to SF-SRS. Other potential risk factors of RN include the volume of overlap of normal tissue receiving 12 Gy at the first course and 18 Gy at the second course of SF-SRS, maximum doses ≥40 Gy of the first or the second SF-SRS courses, V12 Gy >9 cm3 of the second course, initial treatment with SF-SRS, volume of normal brain receiving 5 Gy during reirradiation with FSRT, and systemic treatment. Cumulative EQD2 ≤100-120 Gy2 to brain, <100 Gy2 to brainstem, and <75 Gy2 to chiasm and optic nerves may be considered safe. Since most studies were retrospective in nature, prospective trials are required to better define safety and efficacy of reirradiation for recurrent or progressive brain metastases.

[First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with brain metastases]. / CBNPC sans addictions oncogéniques métastatique cérébral d'emblée : place de l'immunothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy. STATE OF THE ART: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. PERSPECTIVES: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

The Landscape of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Renal Cell Cancer (RCC).

Renal cell cancer (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant. Because of this, conventional radiotherapy (RT) has been predominantly relegated to the palliation of symptomatic metastatic disease. The implementation of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has made it possible to deliver higher ablative doses safely, shifting the renal radioresistance paradigm. SABR has increasingly been adopted into the multidisciplinary framework for the treatment of locally recurrent, oligoprogressive, and oligometastatic disease. Furthermore, there is growing evidence of SABR as a non-invasive definitive therapy in patients with primary RCC who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery, unsuited to invasive ablation (surgery or percutaneous techniques), or at high-risk of requiring post-operative dialysis. Encouraging outcomes have even been reported in cases of solitary kidney or pre-existing chronic disease (poor eGFR), with a high likelihood of preserving renal function. A review of clinical evidence supporting the use of ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in primary, recurrent, and metastatic RCC has been conducted. Given the potential immunogenic effect of the high RT doses, we also explore emerging opportunities to combine SABR with systemic treatments. In addition, we explore future directions and ongoing clinical trials in the evolving landscape of this disease.

A Novel Method for Evaluating Early Tumor Response Based on Daily CBCT Images for Lung SBRT.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to develop a new tumor response assessment method for lung SBRT. METHODS: In total, 132 lung cancer patients with 134 tumors who received SBRT treatment with daily CBCT were included in this study. The information about tumor size (area), contrast (contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)), and density/attenuation (µ) was derived from the CBCT images for the first and the last fractions. The ratios of tumor area, CNR, and µ (RA, RCNR, Rµ) between the last and first fractions were calculated for comparison. The product of the three rations was defined as a new parameter (R) for assessment. Tumor response was independently assessed by a radiologist based on a comprehensive analysis of the CBCT images. RESULTS: R ranged from 0.27 to 1.67 with a mean value of 0.95. Based on the radiologic assessment results, a receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC) of 95% was obtained and the optimal cutoff value (RC) was determined as 1.1. The results based on RC achieved a 94% accuracy, 94% specificity, and 90% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The results show that R was correlated with early tumor response to lung SBRT and that using R for evaluating tumor response to SBRT would be viable and efficient.

Re-irradiation spine SBRT in oligoprogression breast cancer: A case report / Re-irradiación con SBRT vertebral en oligoprogresión de cancer de mama: caso clínico

Stereotactic body radiotherapy has experienced exponential development in recent years, as its ablative capacity has demonstrated a benefit in certain patients including oligometastatic and oligoprogressive patients. We present a case of a 59-year-old woman with a history of infiltrating metastatic ductal breast carcinoma with vertebral bone oligoprogression. After radical surgical treatment and re-irradiation SBRT, a complete response was achieved. After more than two years of follow-up the patient remains with neither local nor distant recurrence. Patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive breast cancer are candidates for radical treatment modalities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy has demonstrated promising local control, progression free survival and overall survival in these patients. In this context, there are currently ongoing phase III studies in order to provide stronger evidence. (AU)

La radioterapia estereotáctica corporal ha sufrido un desarrollo exponencial en los últimos años. Debido a su capacidad ablativa, esta técnica ha demostrado un beneficio en determinados pacientes incluyendo los pacientes oligometastásicos o con oligoprogresión. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 59 años con antecedentes de carcinoma ductal de mama infiltrante con oligoprogresión ósea vertebral. Tras tratamiento quirúrgico y reirradiación del lecho con SBRT se obtuvo una respuesta completa a nivel local. Tras más de dos años de seguimiento, la paciente permanece sin recidiva local ni a distancia. Las pacientes con cáncer de mama oligometastásico o con oligoprogresión son candidatas a recibir un tratamiento radical. La radioterapia corporal estereotáctica ha demostrado unas cifras de control local, supervivencia libre de progresión y supervivencia global prometedoras en estas pacientes. En este contexto, se están desarrollando ensayos fase III que aportarán una evidencia más sólida en el tratamiento de estas pacientes. (AU)

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy administered to a previously irradiated spine is effective and well-tolerated

Purpose This study sought to discern the clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) administered to the spine in patients who had undergone previous radiotherapy. Methods A total of 81 sites of 74 patients who underwent previous radiotherapy administered to the spine or peri-spine and subsequently received IMRT for the spine were analyzed in this study. The prescribed dose of 80 Gy in a biologically effective dose (BED) of α/β = 10 (BED10) was set as the planning target volume. The constraint for the spinal cord and cauda equine was D0.1 cc ≤ 100 Gy and ≤ 150 Gy of BED for re-irradiation alone and the total irradiation dose, respectively. Results The median follow-up period was 10.1 (0.9–92.1) months after re-irradiation, while the median interval from the last day of the previous radiotherapy to the time of re-irradiation was 15.6 (0.4–210.1) months. Separately, the median prescript dose of re-irradiation was 78.0 (28.0–104.9) of BED10. The median survival time in this study was 13.9 months, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 53.7%, 29.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates were 90.8%, 84.0%, and 84.0%, respectively. Neurotoxicity was observed in two of 72 treatments (2.8%) assessed after re-irradiation. Conclusion Re-irradiation for the spine using IMRT seems well-tolerated. Definitive re-irradiation can be a feasible treatment option in patients with the potential for a good prognosis (AU)