Impact of microvascular invasion risk on tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma after conventional transarterial chemoembolization.

OBJECTIVE: To assess tumor progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion who underwent treatment with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) based on microvascular invasion (MVI) risk within 2 years. METHODS: This retrospective investigation comprised adult patients with HCC who had either liver resection or cTACE as their first treatment from January 2016 to December 2021. A predictive model for MVI was developed and validated using preoperative clinical and MRI data from patients with HCC treated with liver resection. The MVI predictive model was applied to patients with HCC receiving cTACE, and differences in tumor progression between the MVI high- and low-risk groups were examined throughout 2 years. RESULTS: The MVI prediction model incorporated nonsmooth margin, intratumoral artery, incomplete or absent tumor capsule, and tumor DWI/T2WI mismatch. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction model, in the training cohort, was determined to be 0.904 (95% CI, 0.862-0.946), while in the validation cohort, it was 0.888 (0.782-0.994). Among patients with HCC undergoing cTACE, those classified as high risk for MVI possessed a lower rate of achieving a complete response after the first tumor therapy and a higher risk of tumor progression within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The MVI prediction model developed in this study demonstrates a considerable degree of accuracy. Patients at high risk for MVI who underwent cTACE treatment exhibited a higher risk of tumor progression within 2 years.

Elevated SLC1A5 associated with poor prognosis and therapeutic resistance to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor, and glutamine is vital for tumor cells. The role of glutamine transporter SLC1A5 in tumor progression and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) efficacy is under study. This research seeks to determine the impact of SLC1A5 expression on the prognosis and TACE efficacy of HCC and elucidate its mechanisms. METHODS: SLC1A5 expression in HCC, correlation with patient outcomes, and response to TACE were studied in an open access liver cancer dataset and confirmed in our cohort. Additionally, the correlation between SLC1A5 expression and hypoxia, angiogenesis and immune infiltration was analyzed and verified by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and transcriptome sequencing. Liver cancer cell lines with SLC1A5 expression knockdown or overexpression were constructed, and cell proliferation, colony formation, apoptosis, migration and drug sensitivity as well as in vivo xenograft tumor were measured. A gene set enrichment analysis was conducted to determine the signaling pathway influenced by SLC1A5, and a western blot analysis was performed to detect protein expression alterations. RESULTS: SLC1A5 expression was higher in HCC tissue and associated with poor survival and TACE resistance. Hypoxia could stimulate the upregulation of glutamine transport, angiogenesis and SLC1A5 expression. The SLC1A5 expression was positively correlated with hypoxia and angiogenesis-related genes, immune checkpoint pathways, macrophage, Tregs, and other immunosuppressive cells infiltration. Knockdown of SLC1A5 decreased proliferation, colony formation, and migration, but increased apoptosis and increased sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs. Downregulation of SLC1A5 resulted in a decrease in Vimentin and N-cadherin expression, yet an increase in E-cadherin expression. Upregulation of SLC1A5 increased Vimentin and N-cadherin expression, while decreasing E-cadherin. Overexpression of ß-catenin in SLC1A5-knockdown HCC cell lines could augment Vimentin and N-cadherin expression, suppress E-cadherin expression, and increase the migration and drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated SLC1A5 was linked to TACE resistance and survival shortening in HCC patients. SLC1A5 was positively correlated with hypoxia, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression. SLC1A5 may mediate HCC cell migration and drug resistance via Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway.

Arterial-Portal Venous Shunt after Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Risk factors and Impact on Patient Survival.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been well established. The differential impacts of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as opposed to conventional TACE (cTACE) on vascular changes, such as arterial-portal venous shunts (APSs), have been recognized. However, their subsequent effects on treatment outcomes have not been fully explored. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of APS in HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE and to evaluate its impact on patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2012 to December 2018 including 74 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE as initial treatment and a 1:1 cTACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE. RESULTS: APS incidence was significantly higher after DEB-TACE than cTACE (46.0% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median OS between APS and non-APS groups after DEB-TACE: 50 months (24.6-75.4) versus 26.9 months (19.5-43.2), p = 0.111; median PFS was 15.6 months (4.1-27.1) and 9.5 months (6.8-12.1) for the two groups, respectively, p = 0.065. Risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE were more than two feeding arteries (OR: 7.25, 95% CI: 1.82-28.95, p = 0.005) and non-selective embolization (OR: 8.02, 95% CI: 2.30-27.95, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: APS occurrence was higher in DEB-TACE-treated HCC patients, but it did not significantly affect OS and PFS. More than two feeding arteries and non-selective embolization were significant risk factors for APS occurrence after DEB-TACE.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib individually has shown favorable outcomes, but there is currently no meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy and safety of this combined treatment for HCC. The aim of this study was to identify the efficacy and safety of TACE plus lenvatinib for the treatment of HCC. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was conducted on July 31, 2023. RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of TACE in combination with lenvatinib for the treatment of HCC were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Outcome measures such as objective response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety parameters were extracted from the included studies. Binary outcomes were analyzed using odds ratio (OR), risk ratio, or hazard ratio (HR), while continuous variables were analyzed using mean difference (MD) or standardized MD in RStudio. The quality of the evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. Heterogeneity was considered significant when the I-squared was 50% or less. RESULTS: Five RCTs involving 638 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that patients in the TACE plus lenvatinib group had a significantly higher mean ORR compared to the control group (OR: 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.50-5.32, fixed-effects model; OR: 3.58, 95% CI: 2.45-5.24, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). Specifically, 40.9% of patients in the TACE plus lenvatinib group achieved a PR, which was significantly higher than the control group (OR: 3.51, 95% CI: 2.41-5.13, fixed-effects model; OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.36-5.07, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). The HR for OS was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.62, fixed-effects model and random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). The meta-analysis revealed that the TACE plus lenvatinib group had a significantly higher total adverse effects rate than the control group (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.01-3.43, fixed-effects model; OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.00-3.43, random-effects model, I2 = 0, moderate quality). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the combination of TACE and lenvatinib in the treatment of HCC has shown promising results, with extended OS and improved ORR.

Transarterial chemoembolization with molecular targeted therapies plus camrelizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization plus molecular targeted therapy (MTT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in primary liver cancer have been demonstrated. However, the evidence for TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) is limited. Given the excellent performance of this combination regimen in primary liver cancer, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of TACE plus MTT combined with ICIs in RHCC. METHODS: A total of 88 patients with RHCC treated with TACE plus MTT combined with camrelizumab (TACE-TC group, n = 46) or TACE plus MTT (TACE-T group, n = 42) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy for patients with RHCC by analyzing tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), laboratory biochemical indices, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: TACE-TC was superior to TACE-T in PFS (14.0 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.034) and OS (31.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.009). Moreover, TACE-TC achieved more preferable benefits with respect to disease control rate (89.1% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.036) and objective response rate (47.8% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.036) compared with TACE-T in patients with RHCC. Compared with the TACE-T group, the AFP level in the TACE-TC group decreased more significantly after 3 months of treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment option was a significant predictor of OS and PFS, while the portal vein tumor thrombus and interval of recurrence from initial treatment were another prognostic factor of PFS. There was no significant difference between the TACE-TC and TACE-T groups for Grade 3-4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A combination therapy of TACE, MTT, and camrelizumab significantly improved tumor response and prolonged survival duration, showing a better survival prognosis for RHCC patients.

Utility and predictive value of the CRAFITY score in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of the CRAFITY score (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) has been demonstrated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility and the predictive value of CRAFITY score in HCC after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE plus TKIs and PD-1 inhibitor from January 2019 to June 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients with AFP ≥ 100 ng/mL and those with CRP ≥ 1 mg/dL were assigned a CRAFITY score of 1 point. Patients were divided into three groups according to their CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low, 0 points; CRAFITY-intermediate, 1 point; and CRAFITY-high, 2 points). The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared among the three groups. Tumor response was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after the first combination treatment. Risk factors for OS and PFS were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included. The patients were assigned CRAFITY scores of 0 points (CRAFITY-low, n = 25 [35.71%]), 1 point (CRAFITY-intermediate, n = 29 [41.42%]), and 2 points (CRAFITY-high, n = 16 [22.81%]). Multivariate analysis showed that lower CRAFITY score was an independent factor for the improved OS (P =.045) and PFS (P <.001). TACE session was also associated with the OS (P =.048) in the multivariate analysis. The CRAFITY-low cohort achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR) at the 3-month evaluation of tumor response. However, there was no significant difference in ORR and disease control rate (DCR) observed at the 6-month follow-up. DCR showed a statistically significant difference among three groups during the 12-month follow-up period. The percentage of patients with protein urea was highest in the CRAFITY-high group. No significance differences were observed in grade ≥ 3 AEs in three groups. CONCLUSION: The CRAFITY score is simple and could be useful for predicting treatment outcomes, tumor response and AEs of the HCC patients receiving TACE plus TKIs and PD-1 inhibitor therapy.

Construction of a prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization treatment based on the Tumor Burden Score.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may have varied outcomes based on their liver function and tumor burden diversity. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of the tumor burden score (TBS) in these patients and develop a prognostic model for their overall survival. METHODS: The study involved a retrospective analysis of 644 newly diagnosed HCC patients undergoing TACE treatment. The individuals were assigned randomly to a training cohort (n = 452) and a validation cohort (n = 192). We utilized a multivariate Cox proportional risk model to identify independent preoperative predictive factors. We then evaluated model performance using the area under the curve (AUC), consistency index (c-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) methods. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis revealed four prognostic factors associated with overall survival: Tumor Burden Score, Tumor Extent, Types of portal vein invasion (PVI), and Child-Pugh score. The total score was calculated based on these factors. The model demonstrated strong discriminative ability with high AUC values and c-index, providing high net clinical benefits for patients. Based on the model's scoring results, patients were categorized into high, medium, and low-risk groups. These results were validated in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The tumor burden score shows promise as a viable alternative prognostic indicator for assessing tumor burden in cases of HCC. The new prognostic model can place patients in one of three groups, which will estimate their individual outcomes. For high-risk patients, it is suggested to consider alternative treatment options or provide the best supportive care, as they may not benefit significantly from TACE treatment.

Comparison of percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization versus transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy with insufficient future liver remnant.

BACKGROUND: In China, both percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition plus portal vein embolization (PALPP) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein embolization (PVE) have been utilized in planned hepatectomy. However, there is a lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness of these two techniques for cases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS: Patients were categorized into either the PALPP group or the TACE + PVE group. Clinical data, including FLR growth rate, complications, secondary resection rate, and overall survival rate, were compared and analyzed for both groups retrospectively. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and October 2021, a total of 29 patients underwent TACE + PVE (n = 12) and PALPP (n = 17). In the TACE + PVE group, 7 patients successfully underwent two-stage hepatectomy, while in the PALPP group, 13 patients underwent the procedure (two-stage resection rate: 58.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.42). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications of one-stage procedures (11.8% vs. 8.3%, P > 0.05) and second-stage resection complication (0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.05) between the TACE + PVE and PALPP groups. However, the PALPP group demonstrated a shorter time to FLR volume growth for second-stage resection (18.5 days vs. 66 days, P = 0.001) and KGR (58.5 ml/week vs. 7.7 ml/week, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TACE + PVE, PALPP results in a more significant increase in FLR volume and a higher rate of two-stage resection without increasing postoperative complications.

Lenvatinib, sintilimab plus transarterial chemoembolization for advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Our retrospective study has suggested encouraging outcomes of lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This phase II trial was conducted to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus TACE (Len-Sin-TACE) in patients with advanced stage HCC. METHODS: This was a single-arm phase II trial. Patients with BCLC stage C HCC were recruited. They received lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg, 12 mg; bodyweight <60 kg, 8 mg) orally once daily, sintilimab (200 mg) intravenously once every 3 weeks, and on demand TACE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per mRECIST. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was met with a median PFS of 8.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1-9.8) months per mRECIST, which was the same as that per RECIST 1.1. The objective response rate was 60.0% per mRECIST and 30.0% per RECIST 1.1. The disease control rate was 86.7% per mRECIST/RECIST 1.1. The median duration of response was 7.4 (95% CI: 6.6-8.2) months per mRECIST (n = 18) and 4.3 (95% CI: 4.0-4.6) months per RECIST 1.1 (n = 9). The median overall survival was 18.4 (95% CI: 14.5-22.3) months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 28 patients (93.3%) and grade 3 TRAEs were observed in 12 patients (40.0%). There were no grade 4/5 TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Len-Sin-TACE showed promising antitumour activities with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced stage HCC. The preliminary results need to be further evaluated with phase III randomized trials.

Endovascular surgical neuro-oncology: advancing a new subspecialty.

Endovascular surgical neuro-oncology is a relatively new subspecialty which uses endovascular neuro-interventional techniques for the management of nervous system tumors and tumor-related vascular conditions. Although there are several endovascular procedures that are widely available as standard-of-care diagnostic and treatment adjuncts, there has been a renewed interest to explore endovascular approaches as a means for selective intra-arterial delivery of therapeutic agents to nervous system tumors, including methods for opening the blood brain and blood tumor barriers. In this review, we discuss the historical development of various forms of endovascular intra-arterial treatment for tumors over the past 40 years, summarize endovascular approaches that are currently being employed, and highlight current clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Regorafenib versus TACE Combined with Camrelizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Untreatable Progression After TACE Combined with Sorafenib Therapy: A Case Control Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy. METHODS: The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544). CONCLUSIONS: TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.

Efficacy of CalliSpheres® drug-loaded microspheres combined with doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of the transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads loading with doxorubicin (DEB-TACE) versus conventional lipiodol (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 144 patients, who were randomly assigned to receive either DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres® microspheres or cTACE with doxorubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Patients were followed up for 12 months, with assessments at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate (CR), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety profile of the two treatments. RESULTS: The results showed that DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE in terms of CR (50.0% vs 30.6% at 3 months, p = 0.03; 43.1% vs 25.0% at 12 months, p = 0.04), OS (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, p < 0.05), and PFS (7.4 months vs 4.8 months, p < 0.05), and that the safety profile of the two treatments was similar (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, the efficacy of DEB-TACE and cTACE varied according to the tumor morphology. DEB-TACE showed better CR rates in patients with nodular tumors, while no significant difference in CR between the two groups in patients with infiltrative tumors. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE showed superior efficacy to cTACE in terms of CR, OS, and PFS, particularly in patients with nodular tumors, while maintaining a similar safety profile. These findings suggest that tumor morphology could inform treatment decisions for TACE in HCC patients.

Prognostic implications of CK19 positivity in patients with early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) between patients with early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after hepatic resection, stratified by cytokeratin (CK) 19 expression. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 63 patients with early rHCC after hepatic resection who underwent TACE between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on CK19 expression: CK19-negative (n=31) and CK19-positive (n=32). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for OS and PFS. RESULTS: The CK19-negative group demonstrated a significantly longer median OS compared to the CK19-positive group (635 days vs. 432 days, p=0.013). Similarly, the CK19-negative group had a longer median PFS than the CK19-positive group (291 days vs. 117 days, p=0.014). Multivariate Cox analysis identified Child-Pugh A grade, CK19-negative expression, and increased TACE sessions as protective factors for OS. No severe TACE-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with early rHCC after hepatic resection, those with CK19-positive expression had poorer survival outcomes following TACE compared to CK19-negative patients. These findings suggest the need for additional therapies to improve survival in CK19-positive individuals.

Effect of skeletal muscle index on post-embolization syndrome of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle index (SMI) is a commonly used research method for evaluating muscle mass.However, its impact on post-embolization syndrome(PES) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is unclear.Our objective was to determine the effect of SMI on PES after TACE in patients with HCC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who received TACE treatment for HCC at our hospital from 2015 to 2020. The subjects were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of PES after TACE, and their clinical characteristics were compared.SMI was measured and calculated by cross-sectionally at the level of the third lumbar vertebra based on computed tomography (CT). According to the cutoff value, the patients were classified into either low or high SMI group.Potential risk factors for PES were assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional risk models. RESULTS: A total of 110 people were included in this study, from which including 82 patients experienced PES. Serum albumin was significantly lower in the PES group compared to the non-PES group.The frequency of HCC with a maximum diameter > 3 cm and low SMI in the PES group was significantly higher than in patients without PES. Cox multivariate analysis identified that the maximum diameter of HCC > 3 cm and low SMI were independent predictors of PES after TACE. CONCLUSIONS: Low SMI is an independent predictor of PES in HCC patients after TACE treatment, making preoperative CT assessment of skeletal muscle mass is a simple and effective tool for predicting PES.

Embolization alone is as effective as TACE for unresectable HCC: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.

BACKGROUND: Despite transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was recommended as first line therapy for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the efficacy of transarterial embolization (TAE) has not been widely recognized. This work was to determine whether TAE was as effective and safe as TACE for unresectable HCC. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of electronic databases and other sources for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing TAE with TACE for unresectable HCC. Results were expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) for survival and Odds Ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: We included 6 trials with 683 patients. The risk of bias of included RCTs was from unclear to high risk. There were no significant differences between TACE and TAE for progression-free survival (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45-1.55; p = 0.57), overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.35; p = 0.36), and objective response rate (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80-1.71; p = 0.42) without obvious publication bias. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. TAE group reported similar or less adverse effects than TACE group in all the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that TAE was as effective as TACE. Since TAE was simpler, cheaper and had less adverse effects than TACE, TAE should be a better choice in most cases where TACE was indicated for unresectable HCC.

Evaluation of models to predict prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with apatinib.

BACKGROUND: The HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores have been substantiated as reliable prognostic markers in patients presenting with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment. Given this premise, our research aims to assess the predictive efficacy of these models in patients with intermediate and advanced HCC receiving a combination of TACE and Apatinib. Additionally, we have conducted a meticulous comparative analysis of these four scoring systems to discern their respective predictive capacities and efficacies in combined therapy. METHODS: Performing a retrospective analysis on the clinical data from 200 patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, we studied those who received TACE combined with Apatinib at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between June 2018 and December 2022. To identify the factors affecting survival, the study performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, with calculations of four different scores: HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI. Lastly, Harrell's C-index was employed to compare the prognostic abilities of these scores. RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards model results revealed that the ALBI score, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT, )and tumor size are independent determinants of prognostic survival. The Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significant differences in survival rates among patients classified by the HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scoring methods. Of the evaluated systems, the HAP scoring demonstrated greater prognostic precision, with a Harrell's C-index of 0.742, surpassing the alternative models (P < 0.05). In addition, an analysis of the area under the AU-ROC curve confirms the remarkable superiority of the HAP score in predicting short-term survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the predictive value of HAP, Six-and-Twelve, Up to Seven, and ALBI scores in intermediate to advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving combined Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Apatinib therapy. Notably, the HAP model excels in predicting outcomes for this specific HCC subgroup.

Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to assess the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) as locoregional therapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) beyond Hangzhou criteria (HC) and to analyze the prognostic factors. METHODS: Forty patients with HCC beyond HC who received DEB-TACE only before LT were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events (AE) were collected. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with RFS and OS. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent LT following DEB-TACE with a mean interval of 2.3 months. The objective response rates (ORRs) for these patients following DEB-TACE was 82.5%. The primary AE was post-embolization syndrome (PES), with affected patients experiencing grades I and II. The median RFS and OS were 12.0 months (95%CI: 0.0-30.1) and 52.0 months (95%CI: 11.8-92.2) over the follow-up period until December 2022. The 2-year RFS and OS rates were 42.5%, and 67.5%. Multivariate analyses revealed Child-Pugh classification (HR = 6.24; 95%CI,1.83-21.24; P = 0.01) and macrovascular invasion (MAV) (HR = 3.89; 95%CI,1.07-14.15; P = 0.04) were both significant independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE can serve as a safe and effective LRT in HCC patients beyond HC before LT, and can improve the prognosis of patients, especially without MAV. The higher Child-Pugh classification and MAV are independent prognostic factors after LT.

Liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatic malignant tumors: Clinical features, pathogenesis, and management.

AIM: The study aimed to investigate the clinical features, incidence, pathogenesis, and management of liver abscess after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors. METHODS: From June 2019 to June 2021, patients with liver abscess after DEB-TACE for primary and metastatic hepatic malignant tumors were reviewed and evaluated at our hospital. Demographic and clinical data, radiological findings, management approaches, and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 419 DEB-TACE procedures were carried out in 314 patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors at our medical center. Twelve patients were confirmed to have liver abscesses after DEB-TACE through clinical manifestations, laboratory investigations, and imaging. In this study, the incidence of liver abscess was 3.82% per patient and 2.86% per DEB-TACE procedure. After percutaneous drainage and anti-inflammatory treatments, 10 patients recovered, and the remaining 2 patients died due to direct complications of liver abscess, such as sepsis and multiple organ failure. The mortality rate of liver abscesses after DEB-TACE was 16.7% (2/12). CONCLUSION: The incidence of liver abscess after DEB-TACE is relatively high and can have serious consequences, including death. Potential risk factors could include large tumor size, history of bile duct or tumor resection, history of diabetes, small DEB size (100-300 µm). Sensitive antibiotics therapy and percutaneous abscess aspiration/drainage are effective treatments for liver abscess after DEB-TACE.

Clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization in Child-Turcotte Pugh class A patients with a single small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the standard modalities used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the effectiveness of TACE for treating patients with a solitary small (≤3 cm) HCC and well-preserved liver function has not been definitively established. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic impact of TACE in patients with these characteristics. METHODS: This multicenter (four university hospitals) retrospective cohort study analyzed the medical records of 250 patients with a solitary small (≤3 cm) HCC and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A liver function diagnosed over 10 years. Posttreatment outcomes, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and adverse events, were assessed following TACE therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight of the 250 patients (55.2%) treated with TACE achieved complete remission (CR). Overall median OS was 77.7 months, and median OS was significantly longer in the CR group than in the non-CR group (89.1 vs. 58.8 months, P = 0.001). Median RFS was 19.1 months in the CR group. Subgroup analysis identified hypertension, an elevated serum albumin level, and achieving CR as significant positive predictors of OS, whereas diabetes, hepatitis c virus infection, and tumor size (>2 cm) were poor prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of TACE as a viable alternative for treating solitary small (≤3 cm) HCC in CTP class A patients.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors for HCC refractory to TACE.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus lenvatinib and ICIs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractoriness. METHODS: Patients with intermediate or advanced TACE-refractory HCC who received lenvatinib and ICIs with or without HAIC between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Factors affecting OS and PFS were identified with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were enrolled, with 58 patients assigned to the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 63 patients assigned to the Len-ICI group. A higher objective response rate and disease control rate were found in the HAIC-Len-ICI group than in the Len-ICI group (48.30% vs 23.80%, P = 0.005; 87.90% vs 69.80%, P = 0.02, respectively). The median OS was 24.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 13.0 months in the Len-ICI group (P = 0.001). The median PFS was 13.0 months in the HAIC-Len-ICI group and 7.2 months in the Len-ICI group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analyses suggested that the presence of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh B stage, and HAIC-Len-ICI therapy option were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The incidences of any grade and grade 3/4 TRAEs were both comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: HAIC combined with lenvatinib and ICIs yielded better OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR than lenvatinib-ICI therapy in patients with HCC refractory to TACE, with manageable adverse events.