The elusive and heterogeneous pattern of type 2M von Willebrand disease: A diagnostic challenge.

Type 2M is a very heterogeneous form of von Willebrand disease (VWD) associated with impaired platelet and von Willebrand factor (VWF) interactions not due to a lack of large VWF multimers. OBJECTIVES: To investigate type 2M heterogeneity and to establish the most appropriate diagnostic flowchart. METHODS: Hemostatic and genetic VWF analyses were performed in 14 type 2M VWD patients carrying the p.G1324S, p.R1374H, p.R1374C, p.A1344_A1350del, or p.F1293L mutations. RESULTS: PFA-100 was always significantly prolonged, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) greatly reduced or absent. Plasma VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) was reduced except in the p.G1324S patient, while platelet VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in the p.R1374C patients. The ratio of collagen binding (VWF:CB) to VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in patients carrying the p.R1374H and p.A1344_A1350del mutations, whose large VWF multimers were slightly reduced. Multimer patterns were normal or lacking in large oligomers, or with larger than normal VWF components. CONCLUSIONS: Only PFA100, RIPA and VWF:RCo were always abnormal. We thus propose a minimal diagnostic test battery: RIPA (demonstrating the defective VWF-platelet interaction), VWF:Ag (exploring VWF synthesis), and VWF:CB and its ratio (to explore multimer patterns). Other tests would only serve for confirmation, if necessary.

A two-centre comparative evaluation of new automated assays for von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity and antigen.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by a quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). The laboratory diagnosis of VWD is dependent on the measurement of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). The aim of this study was to undertake a two-centre evaluation of two new automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays systems from Instrumentation Laboratory (Bedford, USA). Using the two new analytical systems that operated with different detection principles: immunoturbidimetric (TOP500 analyser) and chemiluminescent (AcuStar analyser), VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels were determined in samples from 171 healthy normal subjects, 80 VWD patients (16 type 1, 58 type 2 and 6 type 3) and 7 acquired von Willebrand syndrome patients. With commercial lyophilized normal and pathological plasmas VWF: Ag and VWF:RCo assays performed on both analysers exhibited low levels of inter-assay imprecision (AcuStar: CV% range 3.3-6.9; TOP500: CV% range 2.6-6.3). Samples from normal healthy subjects (range: VWF:Ag 44.6-173.9 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo 43.1-191.5 IU dL(-1)) and patients (range: VWF:Ag <0.3-115.1 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo <0.5-57.2 IU dL(-1)) showed a good correlation between the two VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo methods (rs = 0.92 and 0.82 respectively), with only a few inconsistent cases among the patients' samples evaluated. The chemiluminescent assays had a lower limit of detection for both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo compared to immunoturbidimetric tests (0.3 IU dL(-1) vs. 2.2 IU dL(-1) and 0.5 IU dL(-1) vs. 4.4 IU dL(-1) respectively). The TOP500 and AcuStar VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays were precise and compare well between centres, making these systems suitable for the diagnosis of VWD in non-specialized and reference laboratories.

von Willebrand factor Ristocetin co-factor activity to von Willebrand factor antigen level ratio for diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome caused by aortic stenosis.

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) causes acquired von Willebrand syndrome by the excessive shear stress-dependent cleavage of high molecular weight multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF). While the current standard diagnostic method is so-called VWF multimer analysis that is western blotting under nonreducing conditions, it remains unclear whether a ratio of VWF Ristocetin co-factor activity (VWF:RCo) to VWF antigen levels (VWF:Ag) of <0.7, which can be measured with an automated coagulation analyzer in clinical laboratories and is used for the diagnosis of hereditary von Willebrand disease. Objectives: To evaluated whether the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag is useful for the diagnosis of AS-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Methods: VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag were evaluated with the VWF large multimer index as a reference, which represents the percentage of a patient's VWF high molecular weight multimer ratio to that of standard plasma in the VWF multimer analysis. Results: We analyzed 382 patients with AS having transaortic valve maximal pressure gradients of >30 mmHg, 27 patients with peripheral artery disease, and 46 control patients free of cardiovascular disease with osteoarthritis, diabetes, and so on. We assumed a large multimer index of <80% as loss of VWF large multimers since 59.0% of patients with severe AS had the indices of <80%, while no control patients or patients with peripheral artery disease, except for 2 patients, exhibited the indices of <80%. The VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios, measured using an automated blood coagulation analyzer, were correlated with the indices (rs = 0.470, P < .001). When the ratio of <0.7 was used as a cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity to VWF large multimer indices of <80% were 0.437 and 0.826, respectively. Conclusion: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios of <0.7 may indicate loss of VWF large multimers with high specificity, but low sensitivity. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios in patients with AS having a ratio of <0.7 may be useful for monitoring the loss of VWF large multimers during their clinical courses.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by a Glycoprotein Ib-Binding Assay (VWF:GPIbR): HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor Activity on ACL TOP®.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a lifelong and common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a quantitative deficiency and/or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In order to establish the correct diagnosis of VWD, various tests must be conducted, including evaluation of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and VWF functional activity. The platelet-dependent VWF activity is measured in different ways, with the historical ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) using platelet aggregometry now replaced with newer assays that offer better precision, lower limits of detection, low coefficient of variation, and are fully automated. The VWF activity by glycoprotein Ib-binding assays (VWF:GPIbR) measured on the ACL TOP® platform represents an automated assay that instead of using platelets employs latex beads coated with recombinant wild-type GPIb. VWF in the test sample agglutinates the polystyrene beads coated with GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. The reduction of turbidity as beads agglutinate represents a linear relationship with VWF:GPIbR activity. Using a ratio of VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, the VWF:GPIbR assay also provides good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing type 1 VWD from type 2. The following chapter describes a detailed protocol for the VWF:GPIbR assay.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory).

A Comparative Evaluation of an Automated Functional Assay for Von Willebrand Factor Activity in Type 1 Von Willebrand Disease.

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is the standard functional assay used for von Willebrand disease (VWD) diagnosis. However, it has some drawbacks including being time consuming and labor intensive and having high inter-laboratory variability. The HemosIL VWF activity assay has the advantages of both high speed and automation. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare these two functional assays for type 1 VWD detection. METHODS: Plasma samples from 108 subjects were assessed in this study. HemosIL VWF activity was measured with the HemosIL latex immunoturbidimetric commercial kits by the ACL TOP coagulation analyzer. VWF:RCo was measured by platelet aggregation method. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to estimate the correlation of HemosIL VWF activity with VWF:RCo. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the two diagnostic tests. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between VWF:RCo and HemosIL VWF activity was 0.874 overall and was 0.761 and 0.811 in the cohorts of type 1 VWD and non-VWD, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HemosIL VWF activity assay for type 1 VWD identification were 94.7% and 80.0%, respectively, and the ROC curve of HemosIL VWF activity was larger than that of VWF:RCo (0.928 vs 0.863, p=0.0138). Finally, the positive and negative predictive values of the HemosIL VWF activity assay for type 1 VWD detection were 72.0% and 96.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the HemosIL VWF activity assay was an effective method for type 1 VWD screening and diagnosis. It carried good sensitivity and specificity and had a higher ROC curve than VWF:RCo besides showing good correlation with VWF:RCo. With its advantages of greater speed and automated performance, these results suggest that the HemosIL VWF activity assay was reliable and precise in the clinical setting.

Upregulation of pulmonary tissue factor, loss of thrombomodulin and immunothrombosis in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with thrombotic and microvascular complications. The cause of coagulopathy in the disease is incompletely understood. METHODS: A single-center cross-sectional study including 66 adult COVID-19 patients (40 moderate, 26 severe disease), and 9 controls, performed between 04/2020 and 10/2020. Markers of coagulation, endothelial cell function [angiopoietin-1,-2, P-selectin, von Willebrand Factor Antigen (WF:Ag), von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor, ADAMTS13, thrombomodulin, soluble Endothelial cell Protein C Receptor (sEPCR), Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor], neutrophil activation (elastase, citrullinated histones) and fibrinolysis (tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) were evaluated using ELISA. Tissue Factor (TF) was estimated by antithrombin-FVIIa complex (AT/FVIIa) and microparticles-TF (MP-TF). We correlated each marker and determined its association with severity. Expression of pulmonary TF, thrombomodulin and EPCR was determined by immunohistochemistry in 9 autopsies. FINDINGS: Comorbidities were frequent in both groups, with older age associated with severe disease. All patients were on prophylactic anticoagulants. Three patients (4.5%) developed pulmonary embolism. Mortality was 7.5%. Patients presented with mild alterations in the coagulogram (compensated state). Biomarkers of endothelial cell, neutrophil activation and fibrinolysis were elevated in severe vs moderate disease; AT/FVIIa and MP-TF levels were higher in severe patients. Logistic regression revealed an association of D-dimers, angiopoietin-1, vWF:Ag, thrombomodulin, white blood cells, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and hemoglobin levels with severity, with ANC and vWF:Ag identified as independent factors. Notably, postmortem specimens demonstrated epithelial expression of TF in the lung of fatal COVID-19 cases with loss of thrombomodulin staining, implying in a shift towards a procoagulant state. INTERPRETATION: Coagulation dysregulation has multifactorial etiology in SARS-Cov-2 infection. Upregulation of pulmonary TF with loss of thrombomodulin emerge as a potential link to immunothrombosis, and therapeutic targets in the disease. FUNDING: John Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by Glycoprotein Ib Binding Assays (VWF:GPIb).

In addition to assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag), the first-line laboratory investigation of possible von Willebrand disease (VWD) often includes an assay to measure GPIb (glycoprotein Ib) binding activity of VWF. A decreased GPIb binding activity is characteristic for most of the VWD types. For many years, the most frequently used assay for measuring GPIb binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), which measures the agglutination of fixed human platelets by VWF in the presence of ristocetin. Because of performance issues, including high assay variability and a lack of VWF sensitivity, this assay is currently being replaced or supplemented by assays based on the binding of VWF to recombinant GPIb. One published method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbR) uses wild-type GPIb for triggering the binding reaction in the presence of ristocetin. Another more widely used method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbM) uses gain-of-function GPIb without ristocetin; this permits spontaneous binding of VWF to GPIb and avoids problems associated with the nonphysiological substance ristocetin. The binding of VWF to GPIb can be quantified by using different principles, e.g., ELISA, particle agglutination, or chemiluminescence. The following chapter describes a ristocetin-free method based on particle agglutination in more detail.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor (VWF:RCo).

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can also arise as an acquired syndrome (AVWS). These disorders develop due to defects and/or deficiency of the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Laboratory testing for these VWF-related disorders requires assessment of both VWF level and VWF activity, the latter requiring multiple assays because of the many functions carried out by VWF to help prevent bleeding. The current paper describes several protocols for assessment of VWF activity by means of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). These assays identify VWF activity by quantitative assessment of VWF protein adhesion to platelets or other particles and subsequent detection of the adhered VWF as facilitated by inclusion of ristocetin. The most commonly performed assays for VWF:RCo comprise platelet agglutination assays, latex agglutination assays, and chemiluminescent assay (CLIA), with three of these described in this chapter.