Examining the Influence of a General Surgery Resident's Transplant Experience on Their Pursuit of Transplant Surgery Fellowship.

BACKGROUND: Transplant surgery has historically been a less desirable fellowship among general surgery graduates. Limited work has been done to understand factors associated with residents' interest in transplantation. Using a multi-institutional cohort, we examined how the resident experience on transplant surgery may influence their decision to pursue transplant fellowship. METHODS: Individual demographics, program characteristics, and transplant-specific case logs were collected for graduates from 2010 to 2020 at 20 general surgery residency programs within the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium. Residents who pursued transplant surgery fellowship were compared to those who went directly into practice or pursued a non-transplant fellowship. RESULTS: Among 1342 general surgery graduates, 52 (3.9%) pursued abdominal transplant fellowship. These residents completed more transplant (22 vs. 9), liver (14 vs. 9), pancreas (15 vs. 11), and vascular access operations (38 vs. 30) compared to residents who did not pursue transplant fellowship (all p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression found that residents underrepresented in medicine were three times more likely (95% CI 1.54-6.58, p < 0.01) and residents at a program co-located with a transplant fellowship six times more likely (95% CI 1.95-18.18, p < 0.01) to pursue transplant fellowship. Additionally, a resident's increasing total transplant operative volume was associated with an increased likelihood of pursuing a transplant fellowship (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.14, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The findings from this multi-institutional study demonstrate that increased exposure to transplant operations and interaction within a transplant training program is associated with a resident's pursuit of transplant surgery fellowship. Efforts to increase operative exposure, case participation, and mentorship may optimize the resident experience and promote the transplant surgery pipeline.

Case log trends of urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows: A comparison of urology- and gynecology-based fellowship programs.

AIMS: Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO- and GYN-based URPS programs. METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for URPS GFCs in both GYN- and URO-based programs were analyzed for the 2019-2023 academic years (AY). Unpaired t-tests with Welch's correction were used to compare annual mean logged cases between URO- versus GYN-based GFCs for select surgical categories and the top 11 most logged index cases. RESULTS: GYN-based GFCs logged more cases for all pelvic organ prolapse (POP) categories including surgery on apical POP, anterior wall POP, and posterior wall POP (all p < 0.01), while URO-based GFCs logged more cases for surgery on the urinary system (p = 0.03). For the top 11 logged procedures, URO-based GFCs logged more sacral neuromodulation cases (p = 0.02), whereas GYN-based GFCs logged more slings, vaginal hysterectomies, minimally-invasive hysterectomies, vaginal apical POP, vaginal posterior POP, vaginal anterior POP, and minimally-invasive apical POP cases (all p < 0.01). There was no difference between URO- and GYN-based GFCs for complex urodynamics, cystoscopy with botox injection, or periurethral injection cases. CONCLUSIONS: URO-based URPS fellows tend to graduate with more surgery on the urinary system and sacral neuromodulation cases, while GYN-based fellows perform more slings, hysterectomies, and POP surgery. These findings may help fellowships better understand potential differences in training among graduates from URO- and GYN-based programs and encourage collaboration to lessen these discrepancies.

Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopy is a major part of surgical training. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has set standards regarding the minimum volume of endoscopy cases required for graduation. However, there is paucity of high-quality data on the number of cases that most surgical graduates perform. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from ACGME-accredited programs from 2010 to 2023. Data on mean number of endoscopy cases, including mean in each subcategory, were retrieved. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to investigate trends in endoscopy experience. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2023, the mean overall endoscopy procedures per resident remained stable, with 129.5 in 2010 and 132.1 in 2023 (t = 0.429; p-value = 0.037). The majority of these cases were performed as surgeon junior (76.6% in 2010; 80.9% in 2023), while the remaining cases were logged as surgeon chief. The most substantial contribution to the overall volume was from flexible colonoscopy (mean: 64.1 in 2010 and 67.2 in 2023). The volume for colonoscopy remained fairly stable (t = 0.429; p-value = 0.036). This was followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (mean: 35.3 in 2010 and 35.5 in 2023), which saw a significant increase in volume (t = 0.890; p-value ≤ 0.001). There was a significant increase in the number of overall upper endoscopic procedures (t = 0.791; p-value ≤ 0.001), while lower endoscopic procedures did not change significantly (t = 0.319; p-value = 0.125). The procedural volume for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, sigmoidoscopy, cystoscopy/ureteroscopy, laryngoscopy, and bronchoscopy decreased significantly (p-value < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: The overall endoscopy volume for general surgery residents has largely remained stable, with a minor increase in esophagogastroduodenoscopy and no change in colonoscopy. Future research should investigate whether simulation-based exercises can bridge the gap between procedural volume and learning curve requirements for endoscopy.

Resident Exposure and Involvement in Core Procedural Competencies within Pediatric Plastic Surgery.

Introduction: The implementation of competency-based residency training in plastic surgery is underway. Key competencies in plastic surgery have been previously identified, however, within the domain of pediatrics, data suggest limited exposure throughout training for Canadian graduates. This study aims to identify the exposure and involvement of residents in core pediatric cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective, multicenter review of plastic surgery resident case logs (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) across 10 Canadian, English-speaking training programs between 2004 and 2014. Case logs were coded according to the 8 core pediatric competencies previously identified by a modified Delphi technique. Results: A total of 3061 of 59 405 cases (5.2%) logged by 55 graduating residents were core pediatric procedures with an average of 55.6 ± 23.0 cases logged per resident. The top 3 most commonly logged procedures were cleft lip repair, cleft palate repair, and setback otoplasty. The number of cases per program varied widely with the most at 731 and least at 85 logged cases. Roles across procedures have wide variation and residents are most commonly identified as the assistant rather than surgeon or co-surgeon. Conclusion: These findings highlight variability both within and across residency programs with a paucity of exposure and involvement in pediatric plastic surgery cases. This may present a conflict between current recommendations for residency-specific procedural competencies and true clinical exposure. Further curriculum development and simulation may be of benefit.

Introduction: La formation des résidents fondée sur les compétences est en voie d'être adoptée en chirurgie plastique. Les compétences clés sont d'ailleurs déjà établies, mais dans le domaine de la pédiatrie, les données indiquent que les diplômés canadiens y sont peu exposés pendant leur formation. La présente étude vise à déterminer l'exposition et la participation des résidents aux cas fondamentaux en pédiatrie. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse multicentrique rétrospective des registres de cas des résidents en chirurgie plastique (T-Res, POWER, New Innovations) de dix programmes de formation anglophones canadiens entre 2004 et 2014. Ils ont codé ces registres en fonction des huit compétences pédiatriques fondamentales préalablement déterminées par une technique Delphi modifiée. Résultats: Au total, 3 061 des 59 405 cas enregistrés (5,2 %) par 55 résidents de dernière année étaient des interventions pédiatriques fondamentales, et chaque résident a enregistré une moyenne de 55,6 ± 23,0 cas. Les trois interventions les plus enregistrées étaient la réparation de la fissure labiale, la réparation de la fissure palatine et l'otoplastie. Le nombre de cas enregistrés variait énormément d'un programme à l'autre, le plus élevé étant de 731 et le plus bas, de 85. Les rôles au cours des interventions étaient très variables, et les résidents étaient davantage qualifiés d'assistants que de chirurgiens ou de cochirurgiens. Conclusion: Ces observations font ressortir la variabilité des pratiques à la fois au sein des programmes de résidence et entre eux et démontrent le peu d'exposition et de participation des résidents aux cas de chirurgie plastique pédiatrique. Elles peuvent révéler un conflit entre les recommandations actuelles en matière de compétences interventionnelles des résidents et la véritable exposition clinique. Il pourrait être utile de voir à l'élaboration plus poussée du programme et des simulations.

Operative Experience of Esophageal Surgery among General Surgery Residents in the United States: An Analysis of ACGME Operative Case Logs.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal surgery is an essential component of general surgery training and encompasses several types of cases that are logged by general surgery residents. There is a scarcity of data on the quality and volume of esophageal surgery experience during surgical residency in the United States. We analyzed trends for 9 different esophageal procedure categories logged by residents in the United States, with the aim to identify areas for improvement in training. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from programs accredited by the ACGME over a fourteen-year period from 2009 to 2023. Data on mean esophageal cases reported by graduates, including mean in each procedure subcategory were retrieved. Cases were categorized as either surgeon chief or surgeon junior for each procedure category. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to obtain tau statistics and p-value for trends in mean operative surgical volume for the total number of cases in each operative category over the study period. Trends in surgeon chief and surgeon junior cases were also investigated for each operative category. RESULTS: The mean number of all esophageal procedures performed per resident during their training increased significantly from 10.5 in 2009 to 16 in 2022 (τ = 0.833, p < 0.001). This trend observed among all esophageal procedures during this 14-year study can be largely attributed to the steady increase in the number and proportion of laparoscopic esophageal antireflux procedures performed (τ = 0.950, p < 0.001). Additionally, esophagectomy procedures had a statistically significant, but modest, increase during the study period (τ = 0.505, p = 0.023), from a mean of 1 case during training in 2009 to a peak of 1.3 in 2020. Although the general trend of esophagus procedures increased during the study period, most categories (7 out of 9) either decreased or did not significantly change. Esophagogastrectomy volume decreased significantly by 30%, from 1 per resident during their training in 2009 to 0.7 in 2022 (τ = -0.510, p = 0.018), esophageal diverticulectomy procedures decreased by 50% from 0.2 to 0.1 (τ = -0.609, p = 0.009), and operations for esophageal stenosis decreased by 75% from 0.4 to 0.1 (τ = -0.734, p = 0.001). Mean number of esophageal bypasses (τ = -0.128, p = 0.584), repair of perforated esophageal disease (τ = -0.333, p = 0.156), and other major esophagus procedures (τ = 0.416, p = 0.063) did not significantly change. CONCLUSION: The operative volume of esophageal surgery that general surgery residents in the United States are exposed to has significantly risen over the past 14 years, largely driven by the increase in laparoscopic antireflux procedures. However, given the recent advances and the resultant heterogeneity in both esophageal surgery, the increase in resident operative volume is still inadequate to ensure the training of safe and adept esophageal surgeons, necessitating postresidency specialized training for trainees interested in esophageal surgery.