RESUMEN
Face transplantation is a viable reconstructive approach for severe craniofacial defects. Despite the evolution witnessed in the field, ethical aspects, clinical and psychosocial implications, public perception, and economic sustainability remain the subject of debate and unanswered questions. Furthermore, poor data reporting and sharing, the absence of standardized metrics for outcome evaluation, and the lack of consensus definitions of success and failure have hampered the development of a "transplantation culture" on a global scale. We completed a 2-round online modified Delphi process with 35 international face transplant stakeholders, including surgeons, clinicians, psychologists, psychiatrists, ethicists, policymakers, and researchers, with a representation of 10 of the 19 face transplant teams that had already performed the procedure and 73% of face transplants. Themes addressed included patient assessment and selection, indications, social support networks, clinical framework, surgical considerations, data on patient progress and outcomes, definitions of success and failure, public image and perception, and financial sustainability. The presented recommendations are the product of a shared commitment of face transplant teams to foster the development of face transplantation and are aimed at providing a gold standard of practice and policy.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante Facial , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado , Humanos , Trasplante Facial/métodos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Banff Liver Working Group recently published consensus recommendations for steatosis assessment in donor liver biopsy, but few studies reported their use and no automated deep-learning algorithms based on the proposed criteria have been developed so far. We evaluated Banff recommendations on a large monocentric series of donor liver needle biopsies by comparing pathologists' scores with those generated by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) we specifically developed for automated steatosis assessment. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved 292 allograft liver needle biopsies collected between January 2016 and January 2020 and performed steatosis assessment using a former intra-institution method (pre-Banff method) and the newly introduced Banff recommendations. Scores provided by pathologists and CNN models were then compared, and the degree of agreement was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Regarding the pre-Banff method, poor agreement was observed between the pathologist and CNN models for small droplet macrovesicular steatosis (ICC: 0.38), large droplet macrovesicular steatosis (ICC: 0.08), and the final combined score (ICC: 0.16) evaluation, but none of these reached statistically significance. Interestingly, significantly improved agreement was observed using the Banff approach: ICC was 0.93 for the low-power score (p <0.001), 0.89 for the high-power score (p <0.001), and 0.93 for the final score (p <0.001). Comparing the pre-Banff method with the Banff approach on the same biopsy, pathologist and CNN model assessment showed a mean (±SD) percentage of discrepancy of 26.89 (±22.16) and 1.20 (±5.58), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of Banff recommendations in daily practice and highlight the need for a granular analysis of their effect on liver transplantation outcomes. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We developed and validated the first automated deep-learning algorithms for standardized steatosis assessment based on the Banff Liver Working Group consensus recommendations. Our algorithm provides an unbiased automated evaluation of steatosis, which will lay the groundwork for granular analysis of steatosis's short- and long-term effects on organ viability, enabling the identification of clinically relevant steatosis cut-offs for donor organ acceptance. Implementing our algorithm in daily clinical practice will allow for a more efficient and safe allocation of donor organs, improving the post-transplant outcomes of patients.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Hígado Graso , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Consenso , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donadores Vivos , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico , Hígado Graso/patología , Biopsia , AlgoritmosRESUMEN
This Position Paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences is the third in a series which describe the nature of the scientific evidence and frameworks that underpin nutrition recommendations for health. This paper focuses on evidence which guides the application of dietary recommendations for individuals. In some situations, modified nutrient intake becomes essential to prevent deficiency, optimise development and health, or manage symptoms and disease progression. Disease and its treatment can also affect taste, appetite and ability to access and prepare foods, with associated financial impacts. Therefore, the practice of nutrition and dietetics must integrate and apply the sciences of food, nutrition, biology, physiology, behaviour, management, communication and society to achieve and maintain human health. Thus, there is huge complexity in delivering evidence-based nutrition interventions to individuals. This paper examines available frameworks for appraising the quality and certainty of nutrition research evidence, the development nutrition practice guidelines to support evidence implementation in practice and the influence of other sources of nutrition information and misinformation. The paper also considers major challenges in applying research evidence to an individual and suggests consensus recommendations to begin to address these challenges in the future. Our recommendations target three groups; those who deliver nutrition interventions to individuals, those funding, commissioning or undertaking research aimed at delivering evidence-based nutrition practice, and those disseminating nutritional information to individuals.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Política Nutricional , Ciencias de la Nutrición , Humanos , Academias e Institutos , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Dieta , Dietética/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the utilization of nebulized budesonide for acute asthma and COPD exacerbations as well as for maintenance therapy in adults. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a search on PubMed for nebulized budesonide treatment. SELECTED STUDIES: Selecting all English-language papers that utilize Mesh phrases "asthma," "COPD," "budesonide," "nebulized," "adult," "exacerbation," and "maintenance" without temporal restrictions, and narrowing down to clinical research such as RCTs, observational studies, and real-world studies. RESULTS: Analysis of 25 studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide in asthma (n = 10) and COPD (n = 15). The panel in Thailand recommended incorporating nebulized budesonide as an additional or alternative treatment option to the standard of care and systemic corticosteroids (SCS) based on the findings. CONCLUSION: Nebulized budesonide is effective and well-tolerated in treating asthma and COPD, with less systemic adverse effects compared to systemic corticosteroids. High-dose nebulized budesonide can enhance clinical outcomes for severe and mild exacerbations with slow systemic corticosteroid response. Nebulized budesonide can substitute systemic corticosteroids in some situations.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Budesonida , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tailandia , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , ConsensoRESUMEN
AIM: Infant gastroesophageal reflux is mostly benign; however, when associated with complications like failure to thrive, it may be indicative of gastroesophageal reflux disease. There are currently several unmet needs pertaining to the management of infant gastroesophageal reflux (disease). Reflux in infants is mostly composed of breast milk or formula, so this population is significantly different to older children and adults. The objective of this Delphi consensus was to establish recommendations based on published literature and the experience of clinical experts in paediatric gastroenterology in the context of infant gastroesophageal reflux (disease). METHODS: The Delphi methodology was used to obtain a consensus on 18 statements relating to clinical aspects of infant gastroesophageal reflux (disease). RESULTS: The expert panel comprising paediatric gastroenterology clinical specialists reached a consensus for all statements by means of an online, anonymised voting system. CONCLUSION: It was highlighted that there is generally low awareness of or adherence to guidelines in clinical practice and that acid suppression therapy should not be indicated for non-acid reflux, which constitutes a significant proportion of total gastroesophageal reflux episodes among infants. Furthermore, it was emphasised that there is an unmet medical need for therapy for some symptomatic infants with non-acid reflux disease.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Lactante , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Consenso , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/terapiaRESUMEN
Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Perioperativa , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Técnica Delphi , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early treated patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) often become lost to follow-up from adolescence onwards due to the historical focus of PKU care on the pediatric population and lack of programs facilitating the transition to adulthood. As a result, evidence on the management of adolescents and young adults with PKU is limited. METHODS: Two meetings were held with a multidisciplinary international panel of 25 experts in PKU and comorbidities frequently experienced by patients with PKU. Based on the outcomes of the first meeting, a set of statements were developed. During the second meeting, these statements were voted on for consensus generation (≥70% agreement), using a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: A total of 37 consensus recommendations were developed across five areas that were deemed important in the management of adolescents and young adults with PKU: (1) general physical health, (2) mental health and neurocognitive functioning, (3) blood Phe target range, (4) PKU-specific challenges, and (5) transition to adult care. The consensus recommendations reflect the personal opinions and experiences from the participating experts supported with evidence when available. Overall, clinicians managing adolescents and young adults with PKU should be aware of the wide variety of PKU-associated comorbidities, initiating screening at an early age. In addition, management of adolescents/young adults should be a joint effort between the patient, clinical center, and parents/caregivers supporting adolescents with gradually gaining independent control of their disease during the transition to adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary international group of experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop a set of consensus recommendations with the aim of providing guidance and offering tools to clinics to aid with supporting adolescents and young adults with PKU.
Asunto(s)
Fenilcetonurias , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Adulto , Consenso , Fenilcetonurias/diagnóstico , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations for the use of systemic therapies (including biologics) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have been published by a few groups of experts worldwide. However, there remains considerable variability in the choice of target severity measure and timing of milestones. To develop consensus recommendations for implementing T2T strategies for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis using biologics. An expert group of Canadian dermatologists (the Committee) convened to develop a T2T consensus statement. They held a virtual meeting during which a preliminary set of criteria was created. These criteria were then reviewed, modified, and recirculated until unanimous agreement was achieved. The Committee agreed that defining treatment target is multidimensional and should reflect objective severity measures, as well as clinician and patient-reported outcomes. The Committee unanimously proposes a criterion-based system for determining the achievement of treatment target. The proposed T2T approach presented here provides a clinical framework for defining treatment success, measuring progress toward treatment success, recognizing when treatment modifications are warranted, and recommending treatment optimization strategies.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Psoriasis , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Canadá , Consenso , Humanos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Spectral editing in in vivo 1 H-MRS provides an effective means to measure low-concentration metabolite signals that cannot be reliably measured by conventional MRS techniques due to signal overlap, for example, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutathione and D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Spectral editing strategies utilize known J-coupling relationships within the metabolite of interest to discriminate their resonances from overlying signals. This consensus recommendation paper provides a brief overview of commonly used homonuclear editing techniques and considerations for data acquisition, processing and quantification. Also, we have listed the experts' recommendations for minimum requirements to achieve adequate spectral editing and reliable quantification. These include selecting the right editing sequence, dealing with frequency drift, handling unwanted coedited resonances, spectral fitting of edited spectra, setting up multicenter clinical trials and recommending sequence parameters to be reported in publications.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Espectroscopía de Protones por Resonancia Magnética , Calibración , Testimonio de Experto , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Metaboloma , Corteza Motora/metabolismo , Mutación/genética , Lóbulo Occipital/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in perinatal and childhood deaths is increasingly used as a noninvasive adjunct or alternative to autopsy. Imaging protocols vary between centres and consensus guidelines do not exist. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to develop practical, standardised recommendations for perinatal postmortem MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recommendations were based on the results of two surveys regarding local postmortem MRI practices sent electronically to all 14 members of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) Postmortem Imaging Task Force and 17 members of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging Task Force (25 different centres). RESULTS: Overall, 11/14 (78.6%) respondents from different institutions perform postmortem MRI. All of these centres perform postmortem MRI for perinatal and neonatal deaths, but only 6/11 (54.5%) perform imaging in older children. CONCLUSION: We propose a clinical standard for postmortem MRI sequences plus optional sequences for neuroimaging and cardiac anatomy depending on available scanning time and referral indications.
Asunto(s)
Radiología , Autopsia , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética , Embarazo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Biomarkers support the aetiological diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders in vivo. Incomplete evidence is available to drive clinical decisions; available diagnostic algorithms are generic and not very helpful in clinical practice. The aim was to develop a biomarker-based diagnostic algorithm for mild cognitive impairment patients, leveraging on knowledge from recognized national experts. METHODS: With a Delphi procedure, experienced clinicians making variable use of biomarkers in clinical practice and representing five Italian scientific societies (neurology - Società Italiana di Neurologia per le Demenze; neuroradiology - Associazione Italiana di Neuroradiologia; biochemistry - Società Italiana di Biochimica Clinica; psychogeriatrics - Associazione Italiana di Psicogeriatria; nuclear medicine - Associazione Italiana di Medicina Nucleare) defined the theoretical framework, relevant literature, the diagnostic issues to be addressed and the diagnostic algorithm. An N-1 majority defined consensus achievement. RESULTS: The panellists chose the 2011 National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association diagnostic criteria as the reference theoretical framework and defined the algorithm in seven Delphi rounds. The algorithm includes baseline clinical and cognitive assessment, blood examination, and magnetic resonance imaging with exclusionary and inclusionary roles; dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography (if no/unclear parkinsonism) or metaiodobenzylguanidine cardiac scintigraphy for suspected dementia with Lewy bodies with clear parkinsonism (round VII, votes (yes-no-abstained): 3-1-1); 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for suspected frontotemporal lobar degeneration and low diagnostic confidence of Alzheimer's disease (round VII, 4-0-1); cerebrospinal fluid for suspected Alzheimer's disease (round IV, 4-1-0); and amyloid positron emission tomography if cerebrospinal fluid was not possible/accepted (round V, 4-1-0) or inconclusive (round VI, 5-0-0). CONCLUSIONS: These consensus recommendations can guide clinicians in the biomarker-based aetiological diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, whilst guidelines cannot be defined with evidence-to-decision procedures due to incomplete evidence.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/sangre , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico por imagen , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Disfunción Cognitiva/sangre , Disfunción Cognitiva/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagen , Consenso , Humanos , Italia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patient-centered care (PCC) could reduce gender inequities in quality of care. Little is known about how to implement patient-centered care for women (PCCW). We aimed to generate consensus recommendations for achieving PCCW. METHODS: We used a 2-round Delphi technique. Panelists included 21 women of varied age, ethnicity, education, and urban/rural residence; and 21 health professionals with PCC or women's health expertise. Panelists rated recommendations, derived from prior research and organized by a 6-domain PCC framework, on a 7-point Likert scale in an online survey. We used summary statistics to report response frequencies and defined consensus as when ≥85% panelists chose 5 to 7. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. In round 1, women and professionals retained 46 (97.9%) and 42 (89.4%) of 47 initial recommendations, respectively. The round 2 survey included 6 recommendations for women and 5 recommendations for professionals (did not achieve consensus in round 1 or were newly suggested). In round 2, women retained 2 of 6 recommendations and professionals retained 3 of 5 recommendations. Overall, 49 recommendations were generated. Both groups agreed on 44 (94.0%) recommendations (13 retained by 100% of both women and clinicians): fostering patient-physician relationship (n = 11), exchanging information (n = 10), responding to emotions (n = 4), managing uncertainty (n = 5), making decisions (n = 8), and enabling patient self-management (n = 6). CONCLUSION: The recommendations represent the range of PCC domains, are based on evidence from primary research, and reflect high concordance between women and professional panelists. They can inform the development of policies, guidelines, programs, and performance measures that foster PCCW.
Asunto(s)
Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Comunicación , Técnica Delphi , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Automanejo/métodos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
The Asia-Pacific Society of Cardiology (APSC) high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) consensus recommendations and rapid algorithm were developed to provide guidance for healthcare professionals in the Asia-Pacific region on assessing patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using a hs-TnT assay. Experts from Asia-Pacific convened in 2 meetings to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations and an algorithm for appropriate use of the hs-TnT assay. The Expert Committee defined a cardiac troponin assay as a high-sensitivity assay if the total imprecision is ≤10% at the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit and measurable concentrations below the 99th percentile are attainable with an assay at a concentration value above the assay's limit of detection for at least 50% of healthy individuals. Recommendations for single-measurement rule-out/rule-in cutoff values, as well as for serial measurements, were also developed. The Expert Committee also adopted similar hs-TnT cutoff values for men and women, recommended serial hs-TnT measurements for special populations, and provided guidance on the use of point-of-care troponin T devices in individuals suspected of ACS. These recommendations should be used in conjunction with all available clinical evidence when making the diagnosis of ACS.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Cardiología/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Cardiovascular/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Troponina T/sangre , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/sangre , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Consenso , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sociedades Médicas , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
Tracheal intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients creates a risk to physiologically compromised patients and to attending healthcare providers. Clinical information on airway management and expert recommendations in these patients are urgently needed. By analysing a two-centre retrospective observational case series from Wuhan, China, a panel of international airway management experts discussed the results and formulated consensus recommendations for the management of tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients. Of 202 COVID-19 patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, most were males (n=136; 67.3%) and aged 65 yr or more (n=128; 63.4%). Most patients (n=152; 75.2%) were hypoxaemic (Sao2 <90%) before intubation. Personal protective equipment was worn by all intubating healthcare workers. Rapid sequence induction (RSI) or modified RSI was used with an intubation success rate of 89.1% on the first attempt and 100% overall. Hypoxaemia (Sao2 <90%) was common during intubation (n=148; 73.3%). Hypotension (arterial pressure <90/60 mm Hg) occurred in 36 (17.8%) patients during and 45 (22.3%) after intubation with cardiac arrest in four (2.0%). Pneumothorax occurred in 12 (5.9%) patients and death within 24 h in 21 (10.4%). Up to 14 days post-procedure, there was no evidence of cross infection in the anaesthesiologists who intubated the COVID-19 patients. Based on clinical information and expert recommendation, we propose detailed planning, strategy, and methods for tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Anciano , COVID-19 , China , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipoxia/etiología , Masculino , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumotórax/etiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The cornerstone of the laboratory diagnostics of small vessel vasculitis is the detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). The current international consensus recommendations suggest that proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) ANCA immunoassays should be used as a first-line test if there is a justified suspicion of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). A second method is only recommendable when the immunoassay shows a negative or borderline result. The precise identification of all patients with active AAV and avoidance of misdiagnoses due to false positive ANCA measurements is achieved when the ANCA determination is limited to defined clinical situations, which are indicative for AAV. There is increasing evidence that the specificity of ANCA to define homogeneous groups of patients could be better with respect to the prognosis than the clinical subtype.
Asunto(s)
Vasculitis Asociada a Anticuerpos Citoplasmáticos Antineutrófilos , Anticuerpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos , Vasculitis Asociada a Anticuerpos Citoplasmáticos Antineutrófilos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inmunoensayo , Mieloblastina , PeroxidasaRESUMEN
Postmortem CT for investigating childhood deaths is increasingly utilised as a noninvasive adjunct or alternative to standard autopsy; however there are no standardised published imaging protocols. This article describes a standardised imaging protocol that has been developed based on current practices of international postmortem imaging practitioners and experts. This recommendation is expected to be useful for postmortem imaging centres wishing to update their existing practices and for those starting paediatric postmortem CT as a new service.
Asunto(s)
Autopsia/normas , Medicina Legal/normas , Pediatría/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Humanos , Cambios Post MortemRESUMEN
Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Encefalomielitis/sangre , Encefalomielitis/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Internacionalidad , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito/sangre , Animales , Biomarcadores/sangre , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas/métodos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas/tendenciasRESUMEN
Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation, and propose for the first time diagnostic criteria for MOG-EM.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos , Encefalomielitis , Neuromielitis Óptica , Neuritis Óptica , Acuaporina 4 , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Encefalomielitis/sangre , Encefalomielitis/diagnóstico , Testimonio de Experto , Humanos , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito/inmunología , Neuromielitis Óptica/sangre , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A Consensus document on palliative care and neurology has made recommendations on the care of people with chronic and progressive neurological disease. This study aimed to investigate whether these recommendations are understood by, acceptable to and used in practice by neurologists in Belgium. METHODS: An online survey was undertaken of 100 neurologists in Belgium, asking for their opinion on all of the recommendations in the Consensus document. RESULTS: Sixty-four of the neurologists replied. Overall, they expressed support for the recommendations, in particular open communication with patients, open assessment of patient and family needs, and discussion of dying. There was less understanding of the role of palliative care in the implementation of palliative care early in disease progression and the role of palliative care multidisciplinary teams. CONCLUSIONS: The survey shows that many of the recommendations in the European Academy of Neurology/European Association for Palliative Care Taskforce on Neurology Consensus document are understood by neurologists, and several are now seen as part of normal clinical practice. However, there is still a need to develop a more collaborative approach between neurology and palliative care services, for the benefit of patients and families.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/terapia , Neurólogos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Bélgica , Enfermedad Crónica , Consenso , Muerte , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Familia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A new temperature-controlled device has been used as a percutaneous radio frequency probe to treat lax submental and other facial areas. It has significant advantages over other esthetic devices as it provides the dual benefit of fat lipolysis and skin tightening. Our goal here is to present consensus recommendations for treating the aging neck. METHODS: A panel of 11 expert physicians convened in Dallas, Texas, on October 15, 2016 to arrive at a consensus on the best current practice for submental skin tightening and contour improvement. Prior to the meeting, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed and a survey was sent to esthetic dermatologists and plastic surgeons who were queried about various aspects of neck rejuvenation. RESULTS: The literature search revealed 10 different technologies for neck rejuvenation evaluated in double-blind (n = 2) and single-blind (n = 1) clinical trials and other clinical evaluations (n = 21). The survey was sent via an email to 1248 individuals and was completed by 92 respondents. Review of the data and discussion by meeting attendees generated eight consensus recommendations. DISCUSSION: Subdermal monopolar radio frequency represents an effective means for disrupting fat volume and skin tightening of the face, neck, and jawline. For suitable patients, this treatment can be used to achieve significant esthetic improvements.