Factors influencing patients' decision-making about preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the roles of individual and interpersonal factors in couples' decision-making regarding preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Couples' decision-making regarding PGT-M was associated with individual and interpersonal factors, that is the perceived consistency of information received, satisfaction with information, self-efficacy (individuals' beliefs in their ability to make decisions), actual knowledge about PGT-M and social support from the partner. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Various factors have been shown to be associated with decision-making regarding PGT-M. However, PGT-M is experienced at an individual level, and to date, no studies have investigated the roles of the above-mentioned individual and interpersonal factors. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a cross-sectional study with 279 participants. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups from May 2020 to November 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were women who had undergone or were considering PGT-M and their partners. Participants were recruited through IVFAustralia, Sydney Children's Hospital and support groups to complete online questionnaires. Decisional regret, decisional satisfaction and decisional conflict were measured as outcome variables. Multiple linear regressions were performed to examine the association between factors and outcome variables. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to test the differences between participants who had undergone PGT-M and those who were considering PGT-M. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For couples who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was significantly negatively associated with perceived consistency of information received (ß = -0.26, P < 0.01), self-efficacy (ß = -0.25, P < 0.01) and actual knowledge about PGT-M (ß = -0.30, P < 0.001), while decisional satisfaction had positive association with satisfaction with information received (ß = 0.37, P < 0.001) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.24, P < 0.05). For couples who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with information received (ß = -0.56, P < 0.001). For females who had undergone PGT-M, decisional regret was negatively associated with social support from the partner (ß = -0.35, P < 0.05) in addition to perceived consistency of information received (ß = -0.24, P < 0.05). In this group, decisional satisfaction was positively associated with women's satisfaction with the information received (ß = 0.34, P < 0.01), social support from the partner (ß = 0.26, P < 0.05) and self-efficacy (ß = 0.25, P < 0.05). For females who were considering PGT-M, decisional conflict was negatively associated with satisfaction with the information received (ß = -0.43, P < 0.01) and social support from the partner (ß = -0.30, P < 0.05). This study also identified those aspects of PGT-M that couples felt most concerned about in relation to their decision-making, in particular safety issues such as short- or long-term health problems for the baby and potential harms to the embryos and the mother's health. The likelihood of getting pregnant and having a baby with a genetic condition being tested for were also important in couples' decision-making. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study assessed the concerns of couples about having a baby with a variety of genetic conditions. However, condition-specific issues might not be covered. Furthermore, social support from the partner was assessed among females only. Male participants' perceived social support from their partner and the association between mutual support and decision-making were not assessed due to the absence of dyadic data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Results highlight the importance of effective patient education on PGT-M and the need to provide high-quality and consistent information in the context of patient-centred care. Patients are likely to benefit from information that addresses their specific concerns in relation to PGT-M. From females' perspective, support from partners is essential, and partners should, therefore, be encouraged to participate in all stages of the decision-making process. Suggestions for future studies were made. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): B.M. was funded through a Senior Research Fellowship Level B (ID 1078523) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. L.C. was supported by a University International Postgraduate Award under the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. No other funding was received for this study. The authors report no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision aids may support shared decision-making for screening mammography. To inform shared decision-making between patients and their providers, this study examines how patterns of using an EHR-integrated decision aid and accompanying verbal patient-provider communication predict decision-making satisfaction. METHODS: For 51 patient visits during which a mammography decision aid was used, linguistic characteristics of patient-provider verbal communication were extracted from transcribed audio recordings and system logs automatically captured uses of the decision aid. Surveys assessed patients' post-visit decisional satisfaction and its subcomponents. Linear mixed effects models assessed how patients' satisfaction with decision making was related to patterns of verbal communication and navigation of the decision aid. RESULTS: The results indicate that providers' use of quantitative language during the encounter was positively associated with patients' overall satisfaction, feeling informed, and values clarity. Patients' question-asking was negatively associated with overall satisfaction, values clarity, and certainty perception. Where system use data indicated the dyad had cycled through the decision-making process more than once ("looping" back through pages of the decision aid), patients reported improved satisfaction with shared decision making and all subcomponents. Overall satisfaction, perceived support, certainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making were lowest when a high number of navigating clicks occurred absent "looping." CONCLUSIONS: Linguistic features of patient-provider communication and system use data of a decision aid predict patients' satisfaction with shared decision making. Our findings have implications for the design of decision aid tools and clinician training to support more effective shared decision-making for screening mammography.

Perceptions of hospitalized patients and their surrogate decision makers on dialysis initiation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis is often initiated in the hospital during episodes of acute kidney injury and critical illness. Little is known about how patients or their surrogate decision makers feel about dialysis initiation in the inpatient setting. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a large academic center in the United States. All patients who initiated dialysis during a 30-day period in 2016 were approached for enrollment. Study participants were defined as individuals who provided consent for dialysis initiation - either the patient or a surrogate decision-maker. Decisional satisfaction and the degree of shared decision-making were assessed using the decisional attitude scale and the control preferences scale, respectively. These scales were incorporated into a study questionnaire along with an exploratory structured interview. RESULTS: A total of 31 potential participants were eligible and 21 agreed to participate in the study. Continuous renal replacement therapy was used in 14 out of 21 cases (67%) and there was 33% in-hospital mortality in the study cohort. A majority (62%) of patients were unable to participate in the consent process for dialysis initiation and had to rely on a surrogate decision-maker. The mean score for the decisional attitude scale was 4.1 (95% CI 3.8-4.3) with a score of 5 corresponding to high decisional satisfaction. Most of the decisions were classified as shared and incorporated input from clinicians as well as patients or surrogates. Although 90% of participants agreed that they had a choice in making the decision, 81% were unable to mention any alternatives to dialysis initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis initiation was associated with high decisional satisfaction and most participants felt that the decision incorporated input from patients and providers. However, inpatient dialysis initiation was commonly associated with loss of decisional capacity and reliance on a surrogate decision-maker. This finding is likely driven by critical illness. Survivors of critical illness who remain dialysis dependent may need to revisit conversations about the rationale, risks, and benefits of dialysis.

Satisfaction with Fertility Preservation Decisions among Adolescent Males with Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study.

Half of male childhood cancer survivors experience treatment-related fertility impairment, which can lead to distress. Survivors often regret forgoing fertility preservation (FP), and decisional dissatisfaction is associated with a lower quality of life. This mixed methods study examined short-term FP decisional satisfaction among families of male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer who received an initial fertility consult and completed an FP values clarification tool. One-two months after the FP decision, thirty-nine families completed the Brief Subjective Decision Quality measure. Decisional satisfaction was compared for participants (mothers, fathers, adolescents) who did and did not attempt to bank. Semi-structured interviews included the following question: How do you/your family feel about the banking decision now/in the future? Decisional quality scores were moderate-high (M = 5.74-6.33 out of 7), with no significant differences between non-attempter (n = 15) and attempter (n = 24) families (adolescents: p = 0.83, d = 0.08; mothers: p = 0.18, d = 0.45; fathers: p = 0.32, d = 0.44). Three qualitative themes emerged among non-attempter families: (1) satisfaction with decision (50% of participants), (2) acceptance of decision (60%), and (3) potential for future regret (40%). Satisfaction with decision was the only theme identified in attempter families (93%). Quantitively, short-term decisional satisfaction was high regardless of the banking attempt. However, the qualitative findings suggest that the experiences of families who did not bank may be more nuanced, as several participants discussed a potential for future regret, highlighting the importance of ongoing support.