Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Nutr ; 118(3): 229-240, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28831953

RESUMEN

There have been few published controlled studies of multi-component weight management programmes that include an energy deficit diet (EDD), for adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity. The objective of this study was to conduct a single-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing a multi-component weight management programme to a health education programme. Participants were randomised to either TAKE 5, which included an EDD or Waist Winners Too (WWToo), based on health education principles. Outcomes measured at baseline, 6 months (after a weight loss phase) and 12 months (after a 6-month weight maintenance phase), by a researcher blinded to treatment allocation, included: weight; BMI; waist circumference; physical activity; sedentary behaviour and health-related quality of life. The recruitment strategy was effective with fifty participants successfully recruited. Both programmes were acceptable to adults with intellectual disabilities, evidenced by high retention rates (90 %). Exploratory efficacy analysis revealed that at 12 months there was a trend for more participants in TAKE 5 (50·0 %) to achieve a clinically important weight loss of 5-10 %, in comparison to WWToo (20·8 %) (OR 3·76; 95 % CI 0·92, 15·30; 0·064). This study found that a multi-component weight management programme that included an EDD, is feasible and an acceptable approach to weight loss when tailored to meet the needs of adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity.


Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Obesidad/terapia , Programas de Reducción de Peso , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de Vida , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Circunferencia de la Cintura
2.
Nutrients ; 15(18)2023 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37764656

RESUMEN

We performed an open-label, randomised controlled trial to compare the effects of a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) vs. moderate energy deficit approach on body weight, body composition, free androgen index (FAI), and metabolic markers in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Forty eligible patients were randomly assigned to a VLCD (n = 21) or a conventional energy deficit approach (n = 19) over the same period. After eight weeks, both groups experienced significant weight loss; however, this was greater in the VLCD arm (-10.9% vs. -3.9%, p < 0.0001). There was also a trend towards a reduction in FAI in the VLCD group compared to the energy deficit group (-32.3% vs. -7.7%, p = 0.07). In the VLCD arm, two women (18%) had a biochemical remission of PCOS (FAI < 4); this was not the case for any of the participants in the energy deficit arm. There was a significant within-group increase in the sex-hormone-binding globulin (p = 0.002) and reductions in fasting blood glucose (p = 0.010) and waist to hip ratio (p = 0.04) in the VLCD arm, but not in the energy deficit arm. The VLCD resulted in significantly greater weight reduction and was accompanied by more pronounced improvements in hyperandrogenaemia, body composition, and several metabolic parameters in obese women with PCOS as compared to the energy deficit approach.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Humanos , Femenino , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Restricción Calórica , Dieta , Obesidad/complicaciones , Peso Corporal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA