Does age affect patient outcomes after humeral head replacement in the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures? A comparative cohort study with a minimum 10 years long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Humeral head replacement (HHR) is now rarely recommended for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in older patients. However, in relatively young and active patients with unreconstructable complex PHFs, controversy still exists regarding the treatment options of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and HHR. The goal of this study was to compare the survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes of HHR in patients aged <70 years and those aged ≥70 years after a minimum 10 years follow-up. METHODS: Eighty-seven out of 135 patients undergoing primary HHR were enrolled and then divided into 2 groups based on age: <70 years and ≥70 years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS: There were 64 patients (mean, 54.9 years) in the younger group and 23 patients (mean, 73.5 years) in the older group. The younger and older groups had comparable 10-year implant survivorship (98.4% vs. 91.3%). Patients aged ≥70 years had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (74.2 vs. 81.0, P = .042) and lower satisfaction rates (12% vs. 64%, P < .001) than younger patients. At the final follow-up, older patients had worse forward flexion (117° vs. 129°, P = .047) and internal rotation (17 vs. 15, P = .036). More greater tuberosity complications (39% vs. 16%, P = .019), glenoid erosion (100% vs. 59%, P = .077), and humeral head superior migration (80% vs. 31%, P = .037) were also identified in patients aged ≥70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the increased risk for revision and functional deterioration over time after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for PHFs in younger patients, a high implant survival rate with lasting pain relief and stable functional outcomes could be observed in younger patients after HHR during long-term follow-up. Patients aged ≥70 years had worse clinical outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, more greater tuberosity complications, and more glenoid erosion and humeral head superior migration than those aged <70 years. HHR should not be recommended for the treatment of unreconstructable complex acute PHFs in older patient populations.

Factors associated with success of ream-and-run arthroplasty at a minimum of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Ream-and-run arthroplasty offers improvements in shoulder pain and function for patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis who wish to avoid limitations associated with a polyethylene glenoid component. Longer-term clinical outcome assessments of the ream-and-run procedure are sparse in the literature. This study aimed to present minimum 5-year functional outcomes in a large cohort following ream-and-run arthroplasty to determine factors associated with clinical success and reoperation. METHODS: Patients who underwent ream-and-run surgery with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were identified through a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from a single academic institution. To assess clinical outcomes, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) was administered and assessed to determine achievement of the minimal clinically important difference, as well as the necessity for open revision surgery. Factors associated with P < .1 on univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 228 patients who consented to undergo long-term follow-up, 201 (88%) were included in our analysis (mean follow-up period, 7.6 ± 2.1 years). The average age was 59.4 ± 8.8 years, and 93% of patients were men. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (79%) or capsulorrhaphy arthropathy (10%). SST scores improved from a mean of 4.9 ± 2.5 preoperatively to a mean of 10.2 ± 2.6 at latest follow-up. The minimal clinically important difference in the SST score of 2.6 was reached by 165 patients (82%). Male sex (P = .020), nondiabetic status (P = .080), and lower preoperative SST score (P < .001) were included in a multivariate analysis. Male sex (P = .010) and lower preoperative SST score (P < .001) were associated with clinically important improvements in SST scores on multivariate analysis. Open revision surgery was required in 22 patients (11%). Younger age (P < .001), female sex (P = .055), and higher preoperative pain score (P = .023) were included in a multivariate analysis. Only younger age was predictive of open revision surgery (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Ream-and-run arthroplasty can provide significant and clinically important improvements in clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up. Successful clinical outcomes were significantly associated with male sex and lower preoperative SST scores. Reoperation was more common in younger patients.

Glenoid wear and its impact on clinical results after humeral head replacement using a single prosthesis in cuff tear arthropathy with more than 8 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid wear (GW) is a long-term complication after humeral head replacement (HHR) and is one of the major reasons for revision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate GW at >8 years of follow-up after HHR in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) by use of a modified classification of GW, to examine the relationship between GW and clinical outcomes, and to identify risk factors for GW progression. METHODS: This retrospective case-series study included 34 shoulders that were monitored for >8 years after HHR in patients with CTA (13 men and 21 women; mean age at surgery, 70.9 years [range, 55-82 years]). Patients were monitored for a mean of 10.3 years (range, 8.1-13.2 years). GW was classified using plain radiographs as follows: grade 0, no remarkable postoperative changes; grade 1, postoperative glenohumeral joint space narrower than preoperative glenohumeral joint space; grade 2, contact between glenoid and humeral head prosthesis; and grade 3, glenoid erosion. Grade 3 cases were further classified into the following subtypes: grade 3A, partial erosion of anterior glenoid; grade 3B, partial erosion of superior glenoid; and grade 3C, concentric erosion of glenoid. Clinical outcomes including range of motion (active flexion and active external rotation) and postoperative pain (Constant score) were compared between grade 0-2 shoulders and grade 3 shoulders, as well as between the grade 3 subtypes. Age, sex, preoperative range of motion, preoperative pain, and number of ruptured tendons were analyzed as possible risk factors for progression to grade 3. RESULTS: The final GW grade was grade 0 in 3 shoulders, grade 1 in 10, grade 2 in 6, and grade 3 in 15 (grade 3A in 2, grade 3B in 6, and grade 3C in 7). The grade 3 group had lower pain scores (10.7 ± 6.2 vs. 14.2 ± 1.9, P = .044) and limited active flexion (108.2° ± 42.3° vs. 140.6° ± 26.7°, P = .041) compared with the grade 0-2 group. Subtype comparison showed that the grade 3B group had lower pain scores (7.0 ± 6.7 vs. 15.0 ± 0.0, P = .007) and limited active flexion (80.0° ± 26.2° vs. 140.8° ± 27.5°, P = .010) compared with the grade 3C group. Limited preoperative active external rotation was an individual risk factor for grade 3 GW (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.99; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: In the long term (>8 years) after HHR with tendon transfer in patients with CTA, patients with the development of grade 3C GW ultimately achieve pain relief even without revision surgery whereas grade 3B GW is associated with persistent pain and might require revision surgery.

Early outcome of humeral head replacement with glenoid reaming arthroplasty (Ream and Run) for treatment of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) can be compromised by glenoid loosening and failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and midterm outcomes of humeral head replacement with glenoid reaming arthroplasty (Ream and Run) for the treatment of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis, and to identify associations between preoperative factors and outcomes. METHODS: Forty-nine shoulders (mean age 60 ± 7 years) with minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 4.6 ± 1.7) were evaluated. Forty-three (87.8%) were male. Thirteen (26.5%) had previous nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery. There were 19 (38.8%) Walch type A and 30 (61.2%) type B glenoids. Pre- and postoperative shoulder motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed. Pre- and postoperative plain radiographs were evaluated. Mixed effects models were used to investigate factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS: Active forward elevation and active external rotation improved from 111.7° ± 23.8° to 139.2° ± 21.1° and 13.3° ± 20.7° to 38.7° ± 14.7°, respectively (P < .001). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and visual analog scale (VAS) shoulder pain scores at the most recent follow-up were 86.6 ± 19.9, 10.1 ± 14.1, 10.5 ± 2.2, and 1.5 ± 2.3, respectively. The mean changes of PROMs were significant and exceeded the minimal clinically important difference for aTSA. The percentage maximal possible improvement for ASES, DASH, and SST were greater than 75%. Male sex (P < .008) and not having prior shoulder surgery (P < .04) were significantly associated with better absolute and greater change in PROMs. Age, preoperative shoulder motion, and Walch glenoid classification were not associated with PROMs. Five (10.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8%-18.6%) patients underwent revision for pain. Three additional patients were dissatisfied at final follow-up without undergoing revision, resulting in 16.7% (95% CI 6.1%-27.2%) of patients being dissatisfied with their outcome after their initial RnR. Mean Short Form-6 Dimensions scores improved from 0.66 ± 0.12 to 0.77 ± 0.13 and mean EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores improved from 0.68 ± 0.20 to 0.85 ± 0.17 (P < .001). Improvement in HRQoL was significantly associated with nondominant arm treatment, increased age, and greater preoperative SST score. Annual medialization of the humeral head center of rotation was 0.56 ± 1.6 mm/yr. No radiographic measure was associated with long-term PROMs. CONCLUSION: Ream and Run can provide significant and clinically important improvement in PROMs and HRQoL for a high percentage of patients at short- and midterm follow-up. This procedure is an appropriate alternative to aTSA in select patients.

[Shoulder arthroplasty]. / Schulterendoprothetik.

Arthroplasty of the shoulder joint leads to excellent clinical results if the indications are valid and the implantation is technically correct. Taking anatomical requirements and mechanical functions as well as material properties and developments in surgical techniques into account, articulations and anchoring systems have been developed which, as modular systems enable successful restoration of the biomechanics and consider the importance of the surrounding soft tissues. Scientific data show promising medium-term and long-term results in terms of functionality and pain reduction. Nevertheless, due to the limited bone stock for implant anchoring, especially loosening of the prosthesis or instability of the glenoid joint component, revision arthroplasty remains challenging. This review article summarizes the relevant aspects of shoulder arthroplasty.

Tuberosity-overlapping Fixation of the Humeral Shaft in Humeral Head Replacement Surgery.

The fixation technique of bony fragments is crucial for the bone union of the tuberosities after humeral head replacement (HHR) for a comminuted fracture of the proximal humerus. To increase the bone union rate, we reduce tuberosities to overlap on the humeral shaft by approx. 1 cm and fix them with cable wire. Herein, we retrospectively investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of our procedure. Twenty-six patients who underwent cementless HHR for the treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus were investigated. The Constant-Murley score, active shoulder mobility, and bone union rate were evaluated. The mean duration of follow-up was 56.3 months (range 24-197). At the final follow-up, the average Constant-Murley score was 58 (range 40-76). Forward elevation was 126° on average (range 35°-180°). Twenty-three cases (88%) showed bone union between the tuberosities and the shaft at an average follow-up of 4.1 months (range 4-5 months) after surgery. Non-union was noted in 1 case, and bone resorption was noted in 2 cases. The bone union rate and the clinical outcome of our procedure were relatively favorable.

Rapidly Destructive Arthrosis of Bilateral Humeral Heads Caused by Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture.

The bilateral shoulder pain of an 81-year-old Japanese woman due to falls persisted despite celecoxib treatment, and plain X-rays later showed bilateral collapsed humeral heads. After ruling out osteoarthritis, infectious arthritis, crystal-induced arthritis, neuropathic arthropathy, and osteonecrosis, we diagnosed bilateral shoulder joint rapidly destructive arthrosis (RDA). Lumbar bone mineral density showed very low T-score (-4.1). Primary osteoporosis was observed. Histology of biopsied humeral head indicated the features of fracture healing process: callus formation and osteoclasts without empty lacunae. Her history thus included an insufficiency fracture due to severe osteoporosis. Bilateral humeral head replacement was performed; her shoulder joint function improved. This case is extremely rare in that RDA was caused by simultaneous bilateral shoulder joint collapse within a very short time, with minimal or low mechanical stress and severe osteoporosis.

Long-term outcomes of humeral head replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis; a report of 44 arthroplasties with minimum 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated mixed results after humeral head replacement (HHR) for osteoarthritis at short- and medium-term follow-up intervals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes (minimum 10 years) of HHR for the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS: This study included 44 shoulders in 42 patients who had been followed up for a minimum of 10 years, at a mean clinical follow-up of 17 years (range, 10-30 years). Of this group, 31 shoulders had radiographic follow-up beyond 5 years, at a mean of 11.1 years (range, 5-21 years). RESULTS: Patients experienced significant pain relief postoperatively that was maintained during the long-term follow-up (P < .01), with a subgroup of 11 patients reporting persistent moderate or severe pain. Patients maintained increases in shoulder abduction (<.01), external rotation (<.01) and modified Neer scores (<.01). Ten of 44 (22.7%) shoulders underwent revision surgery, predominantly for glenoid arthrosis (n = 9). In the 25 shoulders with 5 years of radiographic follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated moderate to severe glenoid erosion in 50% at 5 years, which increased to 59% at 15 years and 88% at 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: HHR remains a successful operation for osteoarthritis at long-term follow-up. However, there is a substantive subgroup with continuing pain and a high rate of glenoid bone erosion after 10 years. Surgeons should carefully consider patients' needs and desires when judging the indications for HHR.

The subscapularis-sparing approach in humeral head replacement.

BACKGROUND: This report represents a prospective case series evaluating an open deltopectoral approach, both radiologically and clinically, without tenotomy or complete takedown of the subscapularis tendon insertion. We hypothesized that this novel technical approach would allow preservation of the upper tendon border, thus decreasing subscapularis repair failures and fatty infiltration while simultaneously allowing accelerated rehabilitation. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent humeral head replacement surgery through a subscapularis-sparing approach. In this approach, we take down only the inferior 30% to 50% of the subscapularis tendon, leaving the critical superior aspect of the tendon attached to the lesser tuberosity. Forty-three patients were included in the postoperative results (7 were lost to follow-up). Nineteen patients had a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging study, and 24 patients had ultrasound evaluation. Physical examination included belly-press and lift-off tests; follow-up included visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, modified UCLA, Rowe, and Short Form 12 scores. RESULTS: All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients had subscapularis strength equal to the opposite side as measured by lift-off, belly-press, and bear hug tests. Average postoperative scores all showed statistically significant improvement except for general health. All had an intact subscapularis tendon attachment as evaluated by either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound imaging. None had atrophy in the muscle belly. CONCLUSIONS: The subscapularis-sparing, minimally invasive approach to the glenohumeral joint provides adequate exposure to allow humeral head replacement. When the upper border of the subscapularis insertion is left intact, there is a decreased risk of postoperative failure (rupture or atrophy) of the subscapularis tendon.

Increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement.

BACKGROUND: Late complications after humeral head replacement (HHR) for comminuted proximal humeral fractures are common and may necessitate revision surgery. This study evaluated the outcome of revision surgery of failed post-traumatic HHR with a less medialized reverse shoulder prosthesis. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with failed post-traumatic HHR due to rotator-cuff insufficiency and glenoid erosion, but with sufficient preservation of the glenoid bone stock to permit primary stability of an inverted glenoid implant, underwent revision using the Bayley-Walker reverse shoulder prosthesis (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK) and were monitored up for a mean of 31 months. Outcome measures included the Oxford Shoulder Score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, active range of motion, and shoulder radiographs. RESULTS: The average postrevision Oxford Shoulder Score and subjective shoulder value improved from 50 ± 6 to 29 ± 11 and from 23 ± 19 to 51 ± 23, respectively (P < .001). Pain level decreased from 6.2 ± 2.1 to 1.4 ± 2.0 (P < .001). Active forward flexion increased from 34° ± 22° to 63° ± 30° and external rotation from 11° ± 14° to 20° ± 16°(P < .01). More patients were able to use their affected arm to reach a functional triangle consisting the mouth, opposite armpit, and ipsilateral buttock after revision (24% vs 73%; P < .001). Seven patients (21%) had postrevision complications. No glenoid loosening or scapular notching occurred. CONCLUSION: Revision of failed post-traumatic HHR with the Bayley-Walker shoulder offers reliable pain relief and improvement in shoulder function with a complication rate similar to other reverse prostheses. Nevertheless, revision shoulder arthroplasty remains challenging with a high rate of complications.

Revision arthroplasty with a hip-inspired computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing implant for glenoid-deficient shoulders.

BACKGROUND: Revision arthroplasty for failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement associated with rotator cuff and glenoid deficiency is challenging. Current surgical solutions are fraught with complications, and no best-practice strategy has been established. We hypothesized that the computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a total shoulder design resembling a total hip prosthesis, can offer a reliable alternative in this surgically challenging subset of patients with rotator cuff deficiency and advanced glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with failed post-traumatic humeral head replacement associated with rotator cuff and glenoid deficiency underwent revision with CAD/CAM shoulders between 2005 and 2010. Clinical data were collected prospectively and analyzed at a mean follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: After revision, the pain rating at rest (on a 0-10 numerical scale) decreased from 5.6 ± 1.3 to 1.1 ± 1.3 (P < .001) and pain during activity decreased from 7.4 ± 1.2 to 2.1 ± 1.8 (P < .001). The Oxford shoulder score improved from 47 ± 6 to 31 ± 9 (P < .001), and the subjective shoulder value (on a 0%-100% scale) improved from 22% ± 14% to 45% ± 18% (P < .001). Active shoulder range of motion was similar before and after revision. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients and included 1 infection, 2 periprosthetic fractures, 2 prosthetic dislocations, and 4 fixation screw fractures. No case of glenoid loosening occurred. CONCLUSION: The CAD/CAM shoulder offers a reliable method of securing a glenoid component in shoulders with advanced glenoid deficiency and should be considered as an alternative to other surgical methods in these challenging cases. At 3 years' follow-up, pain and clinical scores improved significantly and no case of glenoid loosening occurred.

Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy.

Background: In our previous report, glenoid wear (GW) after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy was classified with modified Goya's classification (grade 0-3), and, among 3 subtypes of grade 3 (glenoid bone erosion), grade 3B (superior eccentric erosion) showed significantly more pain and limited active flexion postoperatively compared to grade 3C (concentric erosion). The purpose of this study was to detect individual risk factors for the progression to grade 3B GW. Methods: Seventy-nine shoulders in 70 patients who were followed up for a mean of 8.2 years (range, 5.0-13.2 years), including 29 men and 41 women, with a mean age at the surgery of 71.1 years (range, 54-87 years), were reviewed. Atrophy and fatty degeneration of torn cuff muscle, preoperative humeral head displacement (superior translation ratio [STR], anterior translation ratio, and other several parameters) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and other individual factors were analyzed as possible risk factors. Results: GW at the final follow-up was grade 0: 5 shoulders, grade 1: 17, grade 2: 20, and grade 3: 37 (3A: 4, 3B: 22, and 3C: 11). Preoperative higher STR was defined as a risk factor for grade 3 GW (odds ratio, 35.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-693.0; P = .018). Comparison among the three subtypes of grade 3 showed that patients with grade 3B GW had larger STR than 3C (41.4 ± 14.2% vs. 23.5 ± 13.3 % P = .006). Conclusion: Patients with preoperative high STR are considered to have a risk for grade 3B GW, which possibly relates to poor clinical outcome and future revision.

[Research progress of greater tubercle fixation and rotator cuff repair in humeral head replacement].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the research progress of the greater tubercle fixation and the rotator cuff repair in humeral head replacement. METHODS: The literature about proximal humerus fracture and humeral head replacement in recent years was extensively consulted and analyzed. RESULTS: The greater tubercle fixation and the attached rotator cuff repair have great influence on the function of shoulder joint after humeral head replacement. It is difficult to make an objective comparison because of lack of direct comparison between various methods, unified standards of grading, and limited number of cases. CONCLUSION: It is an important factor of reduction and fixation of greater tubercle to obtain better effectiveness in humeral head replacement. However, one-stage repair of rotator cuff is more important than greater tubercle fixation for functional recovery of shoulder joint.

Rapid Destructive Arthrosis Due to Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture of the Shoulder: Clinical Characteristics, Radiographic Appearances, and Outcomes of Treatment.

The purpose of our study was the clinical characteristics, radiographic appearance, and outcomes after treatment in patients with rapid destructive arthrosis (RDA) due to subchondral insufficiency fracture (SIF) of the shoulder. Twenty-two cases of RDA of the shoulder were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes for 15 cases who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated at an average of 41.4 months. The mean age of patients was 73.7 years (range 50-83 years), and there were 20 women and 2 men. The mean time from onset of symptoms to head collapse was 6.8 months (range 1-12 months). The mean t-score of bone mineral density was -3.1. Nine patients had pseudoparalysis. Based on radiographic appearance, a diversity of types of head destruction with subchondral fracture, bone marrow edema, joint effusion, and synovitis were observed in all cases. In conclusion, RDA due to SIF of the shoulder, presenting with severe short-term pain and functional disability, commonly occurred in elderly women with bone fragility. MRI revealed bone marrow edema, extensive joint effusion, and synovitis as well as a diversity of types of head destruction with subchondral fracture within several months from onset of symptoms.

Humeral Head Replacement and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracturesm.

Acute proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are generally treated non-operatively if alignment is acceptable and in stable fracture patterns. When operative treatment is indicated, surgical fixation is often difficult or impossible to obtain. Hemiarthroplasty has long been the standard of care. However, with its reliance on tuberosity healing, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction are often poor. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as a new technology for treating proximal humeral fractures but the indications for its use remain uncertain. While not conclusive, the evidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields more consistent results, with improved forward elevation and higher functional outcome scores. The primary advantages of hemiarthroplasty are improved shoulder rotation and shorter operative time. Complication rates do not vary significantly between the two options. Although higher quality trials are needed to further define the role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, current evidence suggests that this is a reasonable option for surgeons who are highly familiar with its use.

A combination of subscapularis tendon transfer and small-head hemiarthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: a pilot study.

This pilot study reports the clinical outcomes of a combination of partial subscapularis tendon transfer and small-head hemiarthroplasty in patients with rotatator cuff arthropathy. A total of 30 patients (30 shoulders; eight men and 22 women) with a mean age of 74 years (55 to 84) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 31 months (24 to 60). The inclusion criteria were painful cuff tear arthropathy with normal deltoid function and a non-degenerative subscapularis muscle and tendon and a preserved teres minor. Outcome was assessed using the University of California Los Angeles score, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and the Oxford Shoulder Score. Radiographic measurements included the centre of rotation distance and the length of the deltoid. All clinical scores were significantly improved post-operatively. The active flexion and external rotation improved significantly at the most recent follow-up (p < 0.035). Although the mean centre of rotation distance changed significantly (p < 0.001), the mean length of the deltoid did not change significantly from the pre-operative value (p = 0.29). The change in the length of the deltoid with < 100° flexion was significantly less than that with > 100° (p < 0.001). Progressive erosion of the glenoid was seen in four patients. No patient required revision or further surgery. A combination of partial subscapularis tendon transfer and small-head hemiarthroplasty effectively restored function and relieved pain in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy.