Present status and future directions: Removal of fractured instruments.

The success rate of fractured instrument retrieval varies because it is dependent mainly on several factors including the visibility of the fractured instrument, the length of the fractured instrument in relation to the curvature of the canal and the techniques applied to each case. This review aims to update the present status on removal of fractured instruments to identify factors and variables that could affect the success of fractured instrument retrieval based on both the preparation techniques and the instrument retrieval techniques. On the other hand, future directions of fractured instrument retrieval should focus on management of nonvisible fractured instruments since the removal of those instruments is deemed unpredictable with the current techniques, whereas the removal of visible fractured instruments is considered predictable now. Another possible direction of it is that there might be no more instrument fracture due to possible significant changes in the root canal preparation technique which may dispense with the use of rotary instruments.

Navigating Separated Instrument Retrieval: A Case Report.

Instrument separation during endodontic therapy is a complication occurring in 2% to 6% of cases. Focusing on the Masserann technique, the study presents a success rate of 55% in retrieving separated instruments. The technique's effectiveness is demonstrated through a case involving retrieving an instrument from the mandibular first premolar. The technique utilizes various tools, including trephine burs and an extractor, providing a reliable means to dislodge tightly wedged fragments. Despite limitations in specific tooth types and the necessity for frequent radiographic monitoring, the Masserann kit proves effective and underscores the importance of attempting retrieval before considering surgical interventions. The presented case exemplifies the technique's clinical applicability and positive outcomes in intricate scenarios, emphasizing its significance in endodontic practice.

The Good Old Masserann Technique for the Retrieval of a Separated Instrument: An Endodontic Challenge.

Instrument separation is one of the most upsetting endodontic errors, and it can occur at any time during root canal surgery. A broken file causes a metallic restriction in the root canal and makes it difficult to clean and shape the instrument effectively, thereby making the prognosis questionable. Hence, such a fragment should be properly retrieved when it becomes difficult to bypass it. A variety of techniques and tools are utilized for instrument recovery; however, most of them are expensive, difficult to master, and technique-sensitive. One such tool for orthograde removal of intracanal metallic obstacles is the Masserann kit. We discuss a case involving file removal from the maxillary premolar by using the Masserann technique.

Retrieval of Separated Intracanal Endodontic Instruments: A Series of Four Case Reports.

The separation of an endodontic instrument during a root canal procedure is one of the most common endodontic mishaps. Separation of endodontic instruments may block access to the apical portion of the root and hamper the disinfection process. It obstructs the appropriate debridement of the canal apical to the fragment, jeopardizing the treatment's outcome. However, due to the advancements in the methods and armamentarium, the effective retrieval of a separated instrument (SI) from the root canal has become possible. This paper includes a case series of management of separated instruments whereby SI was successfully removed in four cases. The instruments were separated intracanal at various levels in the middle and apical third of maxillary and mandibular molar teeth. The level of separation was located, staging performed, and SI was removed using an ultrasonic device under magnification. Removal of the SI was followed by obturation till the entire working length and subsequent post-endodontic restoration. Patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes in all cases was good. Case evaluation, good armamentarium, adequate knowledge along with good clinical skills and experience aid in the successful retrieval of separated instruments. Removal of the instrument without further damage to radicular dentin is important to maintain the integrity of the tooth.

Guidodontics: A global positioning system (GPS) to surgical Endodontics - A case series.

Endodontic treatment is associated with the risk of instrument separation due to multiple factors that create complications not only in further completion of the procedure but also on the final outcome and long-term prognosis of the treatment at times. Separated instrument retrieval is definitely challenging and technique sensitive, requiring a lot of clinical expertise for a successful therapy. All these hurdles make such cases a nightmare to the clinician. This case report presents two clinical cases in which cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided surgery was used for retrieval of separated instruments extending beyond the confines of root canals in a mandibular molar and maxillary premolar. This novel approach utilizes a customized 3D printed surgical guide fabricated with the help of CBCT, which is stabilized intraorally, helping in predefining the osteotomy site, angulation and depth required for retrieval of separated instruments without performing apicoectomy or root end filling. CBCT also plays an important role in these cases as the actual size, location, and depth of the separated instrument can be appreciated preoperatively. In the present cases, 3D surgical guides helped clinicians to selectively retrieve the separated instruments more conservatively and predictably. Furthermore, complete healing was seen within 3 months in both cases.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of ultrasonics in endodontic treatment: A Survey among general practitioners and endodontists.

The use of ultrasonics (US) has greatly expanded in the field of dentistry. Over the past few decades, the application of US has increased substantially in endodontics owing to the predictable prognosis and ease of operation. The objective of this survey was to determine the knowledge, practice, and attitude of US in endodontics among the general practitioners, postgraduates, and endodontists. An electronic questionnaire containing 16 questions regarding the knowledge, attitude, and practice of US in endodontics was circulated among the general dentists, postgraduates, and endodontists and the responses were collected online. Data were statistically examined using IBM SPSS software. A total of 202 dentists (general dentists = 92, endodontists = 77, and postgraduates = 33) participated in the survey. Eighty-nine percent of them were aware of the use of US in endodontics, 36.1% of them preferred using US in the removal of pulp chamber calcifications, pulp stones, access refinement, and troughing hidden canals, and 61.4% chose <3% sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation with US. The cost of the ultrasonic unit and heat generation during procedures were considered the greatest limitation in using the US. The majority of the dentists were well aware of the use of US and its advantages in various endodontic procedures but they did not use it routinely in their practice. The use of US has been reported to have greatly increased the predictability of endodontic treatment.

Dental Operating Microscope-guided Retrieval of Broken Instrument from a Deciduous Molar Using Ultrasonics.

Endodontic procedures are associated with various mishaps, one of which is instrument breakage. It can act as an obstruction to mechanical and chemical cleaning of an infected root canal, thereby hampering the prognosis of treatment. Instrument retrieval must be performed with minimum damage to a tooth and surrounding tissues, minimal loss of radicular dentine and simultaneously maintaining the original canal shape as much as possible. This case report represents successful retrieval of a separated K file fragment from the distobuccal canal of the right mandibular primary second molar 85 with ultrasonic energy application under the dental operating microscope. How to cite this article: Kaul R, Gupta R, Chhabra S, et al. Dental Operating Microscope-guided Retrieval of Broken Instrument from a Deciduous Molar Using Ultrasonics. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-1):S114-S118.

The time taken for retrieval of separated instrument and the change in root canal volume after two different techniques using CBCT: An in-vitro study.

Introduction: Retrieval of separated instrument from a root canal may lead to increased dentin loss and prolonged treatment time. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retrieval time and increase in root canal volume after instrument retrieval with two retrieval techniques under dental operating microscope. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted human mandibular molars with 30°-40° mesiobuccal root canal curvature were selected based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and divided into two groups (n = 20 each). Group 1: Terauchi group (Terauchi ultrasonic tips) and Group 2: Satelec group (Satelec ET25 ultrasonic tip) based on the retrieval technique. Groups 1 and 2 were further divided into two subgroups (n = 10 each) based on the size of the separated instrument; Groups 1a and 2a with ProTaper Gold (PTG) F1 and Groups 1b and 2b with PTG F2. The time taken for retrieval was calculated and increase in root canal volume was evaluated using CBCT. Results were statistically analysed with paired t-test and post hoc analysis by Tukey's HSD test. Results: All separated instruments were successfully retrieved. The mean time for instrument retrieval was lower in Terauchi group than in the Satelec group (P > 0.05) but not significantly. The mean increase in total root canal volume post-retrieval as well as the mean volume corresponding to the coronal part of the separated instrument was significantly lower in Terauchi group than in Satelec group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Terauchi ultrasonic instruments resulted in reduced instrument retrieval time with lower loss of root dentin.

Factors Affecting the Removal Time of Separated Instruments.

INTRODUCTION: Separated endodontic instruments may adversely affect the outcome of endodontic treatment. The combination of ultrasonic techniques and dental operating microscopes appears to be effective in the removal of separated instruments compared with more randomized techniques. This study evaluated the roles of root canal curvature and separated instrument length on the time needed to loosen and retrieve the instrument fragments. METHODS: The retrieval procedures of 128 separated instruments referred to a private endodontic practice for retreatment by general practitioners were evaluated in patients who were monitored for a minimum of 6 months. Preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic images were used to measure separated instrument lengths in relation to the degrees of canal curvatures. Ultrasonic instruments were used in the initial phase to remove the tooth structure and to loosen the fractured instrument. In the second phase, ultrasonic instruments, wire loops, or XP Shapers (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) were used for fragment removal. The time periods for all procedures were recorded. Statistical analysis was completed applying log-normal regression, structural equation modeling, and linear regression using Stata Version 14.2 software (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). RESULTS: All separated instruments were successfully retrieved. Using the protocol in this study, 89.8% of the instruments were removed using ultrasonic instruments alone with a mean time of 221 seconds. The instrument removal time was dependent on both the instrument length and the root canal curvature. Additionally, preparation times were proportionately longer with increasing separated instrument lengths when the loop device was required. CONCLUSIONS: The preparation phase appears to have an important role in the retrieval of separated instruments. Preparation times for both non-loop and loop groups demonstrate that length and curvature are independent predictors of the log-transformed time. Generally, procedure times were extended with increasing file lengths and higher degrees of canal curvature.

Surgical Management of a Separated Endodontic Instrument using Second Generation Platelet Concentrate and Hydroxyapatite.

Fractured endodontic instrument is an unfortunate endodontic mishap which may obstruct thorough cleaning and shaping of the root canals with potential impact on the endodontic prognosis and treatment outcome. When the fractured segment lies apical to canal curvature, overzealous removal of tooth structure is required to gain access to the separated segment which in turn increases the likelihood of root fracture. In infected cases, the stage at which instrument separation occurs is crucial as root canal disinfection is jeopardized. This case report describes the surgical retrieval of a fractured endodontic file from the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molar by limited resection of mesial root. Second generation platelet concentrate called Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and ß-tricalcium phosphate bone graft was placed to fill the surgical defect as the combination enhances the regenerative effect of PRF by exerting an osteoconductive effect in the bony defect area. The clinical and radiographic examination after eighteen months revealed complete periapical healing.

Broken instrument retrieval with indirect ultrasonics in a primary molar.

BACKGROUND: The separation of a file during pulpectomy is a rare incident in primary teeth due to inherently wider and relatively straighter root canals. A broken instrument hinders the clinician from optimal preparation and obturation of the root canal system invariably leading to failure, although in such teeth, an extraction followed by suitable space maintenance is considered as the treatment of choice. This case report demonstrates successful nonsurgical retrieval of a separated H file fragment in 84. CASE REPORT: A 7-year-old girl was referred to the Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry for endodontic management of a primary tooth 84 with a dento-alveolar abscess. Her medical history was noncontributory. After diagnosing a broken H file in the mesio-lingual canal, the tooth was endodontically treated in two appointments. At the first session, a broken file was successfully retrieved after using low intensity ultrasonic vibrations through a DG 16 endodontic explorer viewed under an operating microscope. After abscess resolution, Vitapex root canal obturation with a preformed metal crown cementation was completed at a second session. FOLLOW-UP: The patient was recalled at 3, 6, 12 and 15 month interval and reported to be clinically asymptomatic and radiographically with complete furcal healing. CONCLUSION: Integration of microscopes and ultrasonics in paediatric dental practice has made it possible to save such teeth with a successful outcome. Favourable location of the separated file, relatively straighter root canal system and patient cooperation resulted in successful nonsurgical management in this case.

Retrieval of a separated instrument using Masserann technique.

The fracture of endodontic instruments is a procedural problem creating a major obstacle to normal routine therapy. The separated instrument, particularly a broken file, leads to metallic obstruction in the root canal and impedes efficient cleaning and shaping. When an attempt to bypass such a fragment becomes difficult, it should be retrieved by mechanical devices. Masserann kit is one such device for orthograde removal of intracanal metallic obstructions. These clinical cases demonstrate the usage of Masserann technique in removal of separated instruments in anterior and also the posterior teeth.