Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 28(3): 245-253, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compared with the conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, embedding PD catheter implantation is one of the procedures for planned PD initiation. However, facilities where embedded PD catheter implantation is available are limited, and the impact of embedded PD catheter implantation on hospitalization cost and length of hospitalization is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 132 patients with PD initiation between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 64 patients in the embedding group and 68 patients in the conventional insertion group. We created a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with the gamma family and log-link function to evaluate the association among catheter embedding, the duration and medical costs of hospitalization for PD initiation. We also evaluated the effect modification between age and catheter embedding. RESULTS: Catheter embedding (ß coefficient - 0.13 [95% confidence interval - 0.21, - 0.05]) and age (per 10 years 0.08 [0.03, 0.14]) were significantly associated with hospitalization costs. Catheter embedding (- 0.21 [- 0.32, - 0.10]) and age (0.11 [0.03, 0.19]) were also identified as factors significantly associated with length of hospitalization. The difference between the embedding group and the conventional insertion group in hospitalization costs for PD initiation (P for interaction = 0.060) and the length of hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.027) was larger in young-to-middle-aged patients than in elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: Catheter embedding was associated with lower hospitalization cost and shorter length of hospitalization for PD initiation than conventional PD catheter insertion, especially in young-to-middle-aged patients.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Humanos , Niño , Catéteres de Permanencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización
2.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 122, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658932

RESUMEN

Various studies have focused on the application of fibrin sealants (FS) in thyroid surgery. Utilizing a meta-analysis, this systematic review analyzed the findings of recent randomized controlled trials on the safety and efficacy of FS in patients who underwent thyroidectomy. The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Medline databases were searched for relevant studies, without any language restrictions. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the originally identified 69 studies. Overall, 652 patients received FS during thyroid surgery; their outcomes were compared with those of conventionally treated patients. The primary outcomes were total volume of wound drainage, length of hospitalization, and operative time. Significant differences were observed in the total volume of wound drainage (mean deviation (MD): -29.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): -55.39 to -4.11, P = 0.02), length of hospitalization (MD: -0.84, 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.66, P < 0.00001), and surgery duration (MD: -7.60, 95% CI: -14.75 to -0.45, P = 0.04). Secondary outcomes were seroma and hypoparathyroidism development. The risk of hypoparathyroidism did not differ between the FS and conventional groups (I = 0%, relative risk = 1.31, P = 0.38). Analysis of "seroma formation that required invasive treatment" indicated that FS showed some benefit (I2 = 8%, relative risk 0.44, P = 0.15). Heterogeneity among the different trials limited their conclusions. The meta-analysis showed that although FS use did not significantly reduce seroma or hypoparathyroidism incidence in patients after thyroidectomy, it significantly reduced the total drainage volume, length of hospitalization, and duration of surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina , Tiroidectomía , Humanos , Tiroidectomía/efectos adversos , Tiroidectomía/métodos , Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tempo Operativo , Adhesivos Tisulares/uso terapéutico
3.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 10, 2024 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) has been associated with poor prognosis. The transsylvian insular approach (TIA) and the transcortical (TCA) approach are applied for patients with HICH. We aimed to compare the postoperative ICP parameters of TIA and TCA to identify which procedure yields better short-term outcomes in patients with basal ganglia hematoma volumes ranging from 30 to 50 mL. METHODS: Eighty patients with basal ganglia hematomas 30-50 mL were enrolled in this study. Patients were implanted with ICP probes and divided into TIA and TCA groups according to the procedure. The ICP values were continuously recorded for five days at four-hour intervals. Short-term outcomes were evaluated using the length of hospitalization and postoperative consciousness recovery time. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in age, sex, GCS score at admission, hematoma volume, and hematoma clearance rate (p > 0.05). The results showed that postoperative initial ICP, ICP on the first postoperative day, mean ICP, DICP20 mmHg × 4 h, postoperative consciousness recovery time, the length of hospitalization, mannitol utilization rate and the mannitol dosage were lower in the TIA group than in the TCA group (p < 0.05). Postoperative consciousness recovery time was positively correlated with ICP on the first postoperative day, and the length of hospitalization was positively correlated with mean ICP. CONCLUSIONS: TIA is more effective than TCA in improving the short-term outcomes of patients with basal ganglia hematoma volumes ranging from 30 to 50 mL according to comparisons of postoperative ICP parameters.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Intracraneal Hipertensiva , Humanos , Hemorragia Intracraneal Hipertensiva/cirugía , Presión Intracraneal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Manitol , Hematoma/cirugía
4.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792970

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increased number of hospitalized COVID-19-positive patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this research study was to explore factors associated with the length of hospitalization of patients with T2DM and the mild form of COVID-19. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved all patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and those who were treated in the dedicated COVID-19 department of the University Clinical Center (UCC) in Nis between 10 September 2021 and 31 December 2021. Upon admission, patients underwent blood tests for biochemical analysis, including blood count, kidney and liver function parameters (C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine kinase, and D-dimer), and glycemia and HbA1c assessments. Additionally, all patients underwent lung radiography. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to assess the impact of specific factors on the length of hospitalization among patients with T2DM. Results: Out of a total of 549 treated COVID-19-positive patients, 124 (21.0%) had T2DM, while 470 (79.0%) did not have diabetes. Among patients with T2DM, men were significantly younger than women (60.6 ± 16.8 vs. 64.2 ± 15.3, p < 0.01). The average hospitalization length of patients with diabetes was 20.2 ± 9.6 (5 to 54 days), and it was significantly longer than for patients without diabetes, at 15.0 ± 3.4, which ranged from 3 days to 39 (t-test ≈ 5.86, p < 0.05). According to the results of the univariate regression analysis, each year of age is associated with an increase in the length of hospital stay of 0.06 days (95% CI: 0.024 to 0.128, p = 0.004). Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated for 2.8 days longer than those who did not receive oxygen treatment (95% CI: 0.687 to 4988, p = 0.010), and each one-unit increase in CRP level was associated with a 0.02-day reduction in the length of hospitalization (95% CI: 0.004 to 0.029, p = 0.008). Based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis, each year of age is associated with an increase in the length of hospitalization by 0.07 days (95% CI: 0.022 to 0.110, p = 0.003). Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated for 3.2 days longer than those who did not receive oxygen therapy (95% CI: 0.653 to 5726, p = 0.014), and each unit increase in CRP level was associated with a 0.02-day reduction in the length of hospitalization (95% CI: 0.005 to 0.028, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Based on the presented results, COVID-19-positive patients with diabetes had, on average, longer hospitalizations than COVID-19 patients without diabetes. The hospital treatment of patients with T2DM and a milder form of COVID-19 was associated with older age, the use of oxygen therapy, and elevated CRP values. Patients who received oxygen therapy were treated approximately 3 days longer than those who did not receive this therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Tiempo de Internación , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Anciano , Serbia/epidemiología , Adulto , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Pandemias
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(6)2024 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929581

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of lung cancer patients. Data from patients who underwent surgery during the pandemic were analyzed and compared to pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Multiple parameters were examined, and their changes yielded significant results compared to other periods of the study. The statistical analysis revealed a significant decrease in the number of surgical interventions during the pandemic (p < 0.001), followed by a significant rebound thereafter. During this period, there was a significant increase in the T stage of cancer compared to both pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods (p = 0.027). Additionally, the mean Charlson comorbidity index score was significantly higher during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (p = 0.042). In this crisis period, a significant decrease was recorded in both the total hospitalization duration (p = 0.015) and the pre-operative hospitalization duration (p = 0.006). These findings provide evidence of significant changes in clinical and therapeutic strategies applied to lung cancer surgery patients during the study period. The pandemic has had a substantial and complex impact, the full extent of which remains to be fully understood.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pandemias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Comorbilidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792995

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: episodes of acute decompensation in chronic heart failure (ADHF), a common health problem for the growing elderly population, pose a significant socio-economic burden on the public health systems. Limited knowledge is available on both the endothelial function in and the cardio-metabolic health profile of old adults hospitalized due to ADHF. This study aimed to investigate the connection between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA)-a potent inhibitor of nitric oxide-and key health biomarkers in this category of high-risk patients. Materials and Methods: this pilot study included 83 individuals with a known ADHF history who were admitted to the ICU due to acute cardiac decompensation. Selected cardiovascular, metabolic, haemogram, renal, and liver parameters were measured at admission to the ICU. Key renal function indicators (serum creatinine, sodium, and potassium) were determined again at discharge. These parameters were compared between patients stratified by median ADMA (114 ng/mL). Results: high ADMA patients showed a significantly higher incidence of ischemic cardiomyopathy and longer length of hospital stay compared to those with low ADMA subjects. These individuals exhibited significantly higher urea at admission and creatinine at discharge, indicating poorer renal function. Moreover, their lipid profile was less favorable, with significantly elevated levels of total cholesterol and HDL. However, no significant inter-group differences were observed for the other parameters measured. Conclusions: the present findings disclose multidimensional, adverse ADMA-related changes in the health risk profile of patients with chronic heart failure hospitalized due to recurrent decompensation episodes.


Asunto(s)
Arginina , Biomarcadores , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hospitalización , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Arginina/análogos & derivados , Arginina/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Proyectos Piloto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 440, 2023 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386364

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hydrogen/oxygen therapy contribute to ameliorate dyspnea and disease progression in patients with respiratory diseases. Therefore, we hypothesized that hydrogen/oxygen therapy for ordinary coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients might reduce the length of hospitalization and increase hospital discharge rates. METHODS: This retrospective, propensity-score matched (PSM) case-control study included 180 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from 3 centers. After assigned in 1:2 ratios by PSM, 33 patients received hydrogen/oxygen therapy and 55 patients received oxygen therapy included in this study. Primary endpoint was the length of hospitalization. Secondary endpoints were hospital discharge rates and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Vital signs and respiratory symptoms were also observed. RESULTS: Findings confirmed a significantly lower median length of hospitalization (HR = 1.91; 95% CIs, 1.25-2.92; p < 0.05) in the hydrogen/oxygen group (12 days; 95% CI, 9-15) versus the oxygen group (13 days; 95% CI, 11-20). The higher hospital discharge rates were observed in the hydrogen/oxygen group at 21 days (93.9% vs. 74.5%; p < 0.05) and 28 days (97.0% vs. 85.5%; p < 0.05) compared with the oxygen group, except for 14 days (69.7% vs. 56.4%). After 5-day therapy, patients in hydrogen/oxygen group exhibited a higher level of SpO2 compared with that in the oxygen group (98.5%±0.56% vs. 97.8%±1.0%; p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis of patients received hydrogen/oxygen, patients aged < 55 years (p = 0.028) and without comorbidities (p = 0.002) exhibited a shorter hospitalization (median 10 days). CONCLUSION: This study indicated that hydrogen/oxygen might be a useful therapeutic medical gas to enhance SpO2 and shorten length of hospitalization in patients with ordinary COVID-19. Younger patients or those without comorbidities are likely to benefit more from hydrogen/oxygen therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , Oxígeno/uso terapéutico , Hidrógeno/uso terapéutico
8.
Digestion ; 104(6): 446-459, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37536306

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Length of stay (LOS) in hospital affects cost, patient quality of life, and hospital management; however, existing gastrointestinal bleeding models applicable at hospital admission have not focused on LOS. We aimed to construct a predictive model for LOS in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 8,547 patients emergently hospitalized for ALGIB at 49 hospitals (the CODE BLUE-J Study). A predictive model for prolonged hospital stay was developed using the baseline characteristics of 7,107 patients and externally validated in 1,440 patients. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis assessed the impact of additional variables during hospitalization on LOS. RESULTS: Focusing on baseline characteristics, a predictive model for prolonged hospital stay was developed, the LONG-HOSP score, which consisted of low body mass index, laboratory data, old age, nondrinker status, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, facility with ≥800 beds, heart rate, oral antithrombotic agent use, symptoms, systolic blood pressure, performance status, and past medical history. The score showed relatively high performance in predicting prolonged hospital stay and high hospitalization costs (area under the curve: 0.70 and 0.73 for derivation, respectively, and 0.66 and 0.71 for external validation, respectively). Next, we focused on in-hospital management. Diagnosis of colitis or colorectal cancer, rebleeding, and the need for blood transfusion, interventional radiology, and surgery prolonged LOS, regardless of the LONG-HOSP score. By contrast, early colonoscopy and endoscopic treatment shortened LOS. CONCLUSIONS: At hospital admission for ALGIB, our novel predictive model stratified patients by their risk of prolonged hospital stay. During hospitalization, early colonoscopy and endoscopic treatment shortened LOS.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Colonoscopía
9.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(3): 969-977, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35857241

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of synbiotics in reducing septic complications in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: This was a prospective, parallel-arm, double-blinded superiority randomized control study. All patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis were included in the study. Acute on chronic pancreatitis, pancreatitis due to trauma, ERCP and malignancy were excluded. 1 g of synbiotic containing both pre- and probiotics was administered to the cases twice a day for 14 days and a similar-looking placebo to controls. Patients were followed for 90 days. Primary outcomes were reduction of septic complications and inflammatory marker levels. Secondary outcomes were mortality, non-septic morbidity, length of hospitalization (LOH) and need for intervention. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were randomized to 43 in each arm. Demographic profile and severity of pancreatitis were comparable. There was no significant difference in septic complications between the groups (59% vs. 64%; p 0.59). Total leucocyte and neutrophil counts showed a significant reduction in the first 7 days (p = 0.01 and 0.05). No significant difference was seen in other inflammatory markers. There was a significant reduction in the LOH (10 vs. 7; p = 0.02). Non-septic morbidity (41% vs. 62.2%; p 0.06) and length of ICU stay (3 vs. 2; p 0.06) had a trend towards significance. The need for intervention and mortality was comparable. CONCLUSION: Synbiotics did not significantly reduce the septic complications in patients with moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis; however, they significantly reduced the LOH. There was no reduction in mortality and need for intervention. Clinical Trials Registry of India Number: CTRI/2018/03/012597.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis , Simbióticos , Humanos , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Prospectivos , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica , Método Doble Ciego
10.
Surg Endosc ; 36(4): 2418-2429, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33977378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with acute cholangitis remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine if ERCP performed within 6 or 12 h of presentation was associated with improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: Medical records for all patients with acute cholangitis who underwent ERCP at our institution between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between those who underwent ERCP within or after 12 h using propensity score framework. Our primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, adverse events, ERCP failure, length of ICU stay, organ failure, recurrent cholangitis, and 30-day readmission. In secondary analysis, outcomes for ERCP done within or after 6 h were also compared. RESULTS: During study period, 487 patients with cholangitis were identified, of whom 147 had ERCP within 12 h of presentation. Using propensity score matching, we selected 145 pairs of patients with similar characteristics. Length of hospitalization was similar between ERCP within or after 12 h (135.9 vs 122.1 h, p 0.094). No difference was noted in mortality, ERCP failure, adverse events, need and length of ICU stay, and recurrent cholangitis. However, 30-day readmission rates were lower when ERCP within 12 h (7.6 vs 15.2, p 0.042). No significant difference was noted in aforementioned outcomes between ERCP performed within or after 6 h. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP performed within 6 h or 12 h of presentation was not associated with superior clinical outcomes, however, may result in reduced re-hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colangitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colangitis/etiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Gerontology ; 68(1): 8-16, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33915544

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Frailty has gained increasing attention as it is by far the most prevalent geriatric condition amongst older patients which heavily impacts chronic health status. However, the relationship between frailty and adverse health outcomes in China is far from clear. This study explored the relation between frailty and a panel of adverse health outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicentre cohort study of older inpatients at 6 large hospitals in China, with two-stage cluster sampling, from October 2018 to April 2019. Frailty was measured according to the FRAIL scale and categorized into robust, pre-frail, and frail. A multivariable logistic regression model and multilevel multivariable negative binomial regression model were used to analyse the relationship between frailty and adverse outcomes. Outcomes were length of hospitalization, as well as falls, readmission, and mortality at 30 and 90 days after enrolment. All regression models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward. RESULTS: We included 9,996 inpatients (median age 72 years and 57.8% male). The overall mortality at 30 and 90 days was 1.23 and 1.88%, respectively. At 30 days, frailty was an independent predictor of falls (odds ratio [OR] 3.19; 95% CI 1.59-6.38), readmission (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.25-1.67), and mortality (OR 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-5.96), adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward clustering effect. At 90 days, frailty had a strong predictive effect on falls (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.09-4.01), readmission (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.21-1.57), and mortality (OR 6.50; 95% CI 4.00-7.97), adjusted for age, sex, BMI, surgery, and hospital ward clustering effect. There seemed to be a dose-response association between frailty categories and fall or mortality, except for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is closely related to falls, readmission, and mortality at 30 or 90 days. Early identification and intervention for frailty amongst older inpatients should be conducted to prevent adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente
12.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(1): 199-207, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958401

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Major surgery for ovarian cancer is associated with significant morbidity. Recently, guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic oncology with a structured "Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS)" program were presented. Our aim was to evaluate if implementation of ERAS reduces postoperative complications in patients undergoing extensive cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. METHODS: 134 patients with ovarian cancer (FIGO I-IV) were included. 47 patients were prospectively studied after implementation of a mandatory ERAS protocol (ERAS group) and compared to 87 patients that were treated before implementation (pre-ERAS group). Primary endpoints of this study were the effects of the ERAS protocol on postoperative complications and length of stay in hospital. RESULTS: Preoperative and surgical data were comparable in both groups. Only the POSSUM score was higher in the ERAS group (11.8% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001), indicating a higher surgical risk in the ERAS group. Total number of postoperative complications (ERAS: 29.8% vs. pre-ERAS: 52.8%, p = 0.011), and length of hospital stay (ERAS: 11 (6-23) vs pre-ERAS: 13 (6-50) days; p < 0.001) differed significantly. A lower fraction of patients of the ERAS group (87.2%) needed postoperative admission to the ICU compared to the pre-ERAS group (97.7%), p = 0.022). Mortality within the ERAS group was 0% vs. 3.4% (p = 0.552) in the pre-ERAS group. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a mandatory ERAS protocol was associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications and a reduced length of stay in hospital. If ERAS has influence on long-term outcome needs to be further evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 367, 2021 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33874896

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, clinical data from various parts of the world have been reported. Up till now, there has been no clinical data with regards to COVID-19 from Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). The aim was to report on the first cohort of patients from B&H and to analyze factors that influence COVID-19 patient's length of hospitalization (LOH). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Tuzla University Clinical Center (UKC), B&H. It involved 25 COVID-19 positive patients that needed hospitalisation between March 28th and April 27th 2020. The LOH was measured from the time of admission to discharge. Factors analyzed induced age, BMI, presence of known comorbidities, serum creatinine and O2 saturation upon admission. RESULTS: The mean age was 52.92 ± 19.15 years and BMI 28.80 ± 4.22. LOH for patients with BMI < 25 was 9 ± SE2.646 days (CI 95% 3.814-14.816) vs 14.182 ± SE .937 (CI 95% 12.346-16.018 p < 0.05; HR 5.148 CI95% 1.217 to 21.772 p = 0.026) for ≥25 BMI. The mean LOH of patients with normal levels of O2 ≥ 95% was 11.667 ± SE1.202 (CI95% 8.261 to 13.739; p = 0.046), while LOH for patients with < 95% was 14.625 ± SE 1.231 CI95% 12.184 to 16.757 p = 0.042; HR 3.732 CI95%1.137-12.251 p = 0.03). Patients without known comorbidities had a mean LOH of 11.700 ± SE1.075 (CI 95% 9.592-13.808), while those with comorbidities had a mean of 14.8 ± 1.303 (CI 95% 12.247-17.353; p = 0.029) with HR2.552. CONCLUSION: LOH varied among COVID-19 patients and was prolonged when analyzed for BMI ≥25, comorbidities, elevated creatinine, and O2 saturation < 95%. Furthermore, risk factors for COVID-19 patients in B&H do not deviate from those reported in other countries.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bosnia y Herzegovina/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
14.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(1)2021 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is the most informative pandemic in history. These unprecedented recorded data give rise to some novel concepts, discussions and models. Macroscopic modeling of the period of hospitalization is one of these new issues. METHODS: Modeling of the lag between diagnosis and death is done by using two classes of macroscopic analytical methods: the correlation-based methods based on Pearson, Spearman and Kendall correlation coefficients, and the logarithmic methods of two types. Also, we apply eight weighted average methods to smooth the time series before calculating the distance. We consider five lags with the least distance. All the computations are conducted on Matlab R2015b. RESULTS: The length of hospitalization for the fatal cases in the USA, Italy and Germany are 2-10, 1-6 and 5-19 days, respectively. Overall, this length in the USA is 2 days more than that in Italy and 5 days less than that in Germany. CONCLUSION: We take the distance between the diagnosis and death as the length of hospitalization. There is a negative association between the length of hospitalization and the case fatality rate. Therefore, the estimation of the length of hospitalization by using these macroscopic mathematical methods can be introduced as an indicator to scale the success of the countries fighting the ongoing pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Algoritmos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Alemania , Humanos , Italia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
15.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 42(7): 1504-1511, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988733

RESUMEN

To define the relative importance of fetal diagnosis and comorbidities in severity of preoperative compromise, outcomes and hospitalization in neonatal coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Retrospective comparison of preoperative condition and postoperative course of neonates prenatally (PreDx n = 48) or postnatally diagnosed (PostDx n = 67) with CoA. Congenital and non-congenital comorbidities were adjusted for. Postnatal diagnosis was associated with preoperative mortality (n = 2), and severe acidosis (lactate > 5 mM or pH < 7.20) on multivariate analysis (OR 4.2 (1.3-14.4, p = 0.02), with extracardiac congenital anomalies also a risk factor (OR 3.2 (1.03-10, p = 0.044). Median age at operation was delayed in the PostDx group (PreDx 6.5 days (IQR 4-9) vs PostDx 10 days (IQR 6-17)). Only comorbid left heart disease and extracardiac congenital anomalies were associated with prolonged total length of hospital stay. Prenatal diagnosis is the major adjustable risk factor affecting preoperative condition in critical CoA but does not reduce length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Coartación Aórtica , Coartación Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Coartación Aórtica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(6): 104795, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32222416

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Japan has the largest elderly population in the world. As data on the clinical outcomes in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), including those older than 80 years, are lacking, we analyzed the characteristics of 54,805 aSAH patients and recorded their treatments and clinical outcomes using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. METHODS: Using the Japanese Diagnostic Procedure Combination database, we identified aSAH patients aged 18 years or older who were hospitalized between July 1, 2010 and March 31, 2016. They were categorized as less than or equal to 60-, 61-70-, 71-80-, 81-90-, and greater than or equal to 91 years of age. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors affecting the mRS score at discharge. RESULTS: Of 54,805 patients, 37.5% were aged less than or equal to 60 years; 24.8% were 61-70-, 21.8% were 71-80-, 13.9% were 81-90-, and 2.0% were greater than or equal to 91 years old at the time of the insult. Among 46,107 patients younger than 81 years, 58.9% underwent surgical clipping (SC), 22.9% endovascular coiling (EC), and 18.2% were treated conservatively. There were 8,698 patients aged 81 years or older, 32.4% underwent SC, 23.2% EC, and 44.4% were treated conservatively. A poor mRS score (3-6) at discharge was recorded in 87.2% of patients older than 80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare their estimated odds ratio (OR) for a poor mRS score at discharge with that of patients aged less than or equal to 60 years. The OR increased by 87% in patients between 61 and 70 years of age (P < .001; OR, 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.77-1.98), by 358% in patients aged from 71 to 80 years (P < .001; OR, 4.58; 95%CI, 4.29-4.89), by 1,035% in patients between 81 and 90 years (P < .001; OR, 11.35; 95%CI, 10.32-12.49), and by 1,710% in patients aged more than or equal to 91 years (P < .001; OR, 18.10; 95%CI, 13.96-23.46). CONCLUSIONS: As the treatment outcomes in elderly aSAH patients, especially those 80 years old or older, were poor, the appropriate therapy decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/mortalidad , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Int Heart J ; 61(3): 463-469, 2020 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418971

RESUMEN

Recently, we developed a novel acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk stratification system (nARS), which stratifies AMI patients into low- (L), intermediate- (I), and high- (H) risk groups. We have shown that the nARS shortened the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay as well as that of hospitalization. However, the incidence of AMI-related adverse outcomes has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of severe complications requiring ICU care among the 3 risk groups stratified by nARS. We retrospectively reviewed AMI patients between October 2016 and December 2018. A total of 592 patients were divided into the L- (n = 285), I- (n = 124), and H- (n = 183) risk groups. The primary endpoint was in-hospital complications requiring ICU care defined as death/cardiopulmonary arrest, shock, stroke, atrioventricular block, and respiratory failure. Among 592 patients, 239 (40.4%) developed at least 1 complication requiring ICU care, but only 28 (11.7%) developed complications in general wards. Complications requiring ICU care were most frequently observed in the H-risk group (68.9%), followed by the I-risk group (50.8%), and least in the L-risk group (17.5%) (P < 0.001). Complications requiring ICU care that occurred in the general wards were more frequently observed in the H-risk group (8.7%) compared to the I-risk (3.2%) and L-risk (2.8%) groups (P = 0.009). In conclusion, complications requiring ICU care rarely happened in the general wards, and were less in the I- and L-risk groups than in the H-risk group. These results validated the nARS, and might support the widespread use of nARS.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
18.
Circ J ; 83(5): 1039-1046, 2019 04 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30890684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The novel Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Risk Stratification (nARS) system was recently developed based on original criteria. The use of nARS may reduce the length of hospitalization. Methods and Results: We allocated 560 AMI patients into the pre-nARS group (before adopting nARS) or the nARS group. Patients in the nARS group were subdivided into the low (L), intermediate (I), and high (H) risk groups, whereas patients in the pre-nARS group were subdivided into the equivalent L (eL), equivalent I (eI), or equivalent H (eH) risk groups based on the nARS criteria. Length of coronary care unit (CCU) stay was significantly shorter in the nARS group (2.8±3.5 days) compared with the pre-nARS group (4.4±5.4 days; P<0.001). Length of hospital stay was also shorter in the nARS group (9.4±8.9 days) compared with the pre-nARS group (13.4±12.8 days; P<0.001). Length of CCU stay was significantly shorter in the L (1.1±1.0 days), I (2.8±3.5 days), and H (5.0±4.8 days) risk groups compared with corresponding eL (2.2±1.1 days), eI (4.4±5.4 days), and eH (7.1±7.8 days) risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Length of CCU and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the nARS group compared with the pre-nARS group. The use of nARS may save medical resources in the treatment of AMI in the regional health-care system.


Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo
19.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 34(8): 1351-1356, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30636058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A significant percentage of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) experience bleeding that is severe enough to necessitate prolonged hospitalization. Prolonged hospitalization causes deterioration in patients' quality of life, as well as difficulties with cost-effective utilization of medical resources, and is a financial burden to the society. Therefore, we investigated the factors associated with the length of hospitalization for the optimal management of patients hospitalized with CDB. METHODS: This study included patients who were hospitalized for the treatment of CDB and underwent colonoscopy between July 2008 and February 2016. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the length of hospitalization and the patients' baseline characteristics, in-hospital procedures performed, and the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 223 patients. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, P = 0.014) and blood transfusion (OR 3.1, P = 0.0006) were identified as risk factors for prolonged hospitalization (≥ 8 days). Urgent colonoscopy (OR 0.41, P = 0.0072) predicted a shorter length of hospitalization (≤ 7 days). The study also indicated that endoscopic treatment showed a stronger association with urgent colonoscopy (OR 7.8, P < 0.0001) than with elective colonoscopy and that urgent colonoscopy was not associated with an increased rate of adverse events or re-bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with elective colonoscopy, urgent colonoscopy shortens the length of hospitalization in patients with CDB. Moreover, it is not associated with an increased rate of adverse events. Urgent colonoscopy may be impracticable in a few cases; however, if possible, aggressive urgent colonoscopy should be considered for the efficient management of the patient's hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Diverticulosis del Colon/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemostasis Endoscópica , Tiempo de Internación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Diverticulosis del Colon/complicaciones , Diverticulosis del Colon/diagnóstico , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemostasis Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Psychiatr Q ; 90(3): 661-670, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327081

RESUMEN

This study investigated the relationship between the activities of daily living and the length of hospitalization to determine the optimal length of hospitalization for patients with schizophrenia. We collected information from all schizophrenia patients discharged in Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. A total of 1967 patients were enrolled in this study. The Chinese version of the modified Barthel index (MBI-C) was used to assess patients' actual performance on activities of daily living. We used the paired samples t-test to compare MBI-C scores at admission and discharge and performed correlation analysis to find the trend of MBI-C change with length of hospitalization. The average length of hospitalization was 73.3 ± 42.2 days. There were significant differences between the MBI-C scores at the time of discharge from hospital compared with those at the time of admission to the hospital (93.4 ± 11.2 vs. 88.7 ± 11.8; P < 0.001). Taking the length of hospitalization as the grouping boundary value, the correlation analysis of the subgroup found that below a minimum of 20 days, the improvement in the MBI-C scores increased with the increase of length of hospitalization, and above a maximum of 50 days, the improvement in the MBI-C scores decreased with the increase of length of hospitalization. The optimal length of hospitalization for patients with schizophrenia may lie between 20 and 50 days, with regard to the recovery of daily living function.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA