Does dual oocyte retrieval with continuous FSH administration increase the number of mature oocytes in low responders? An open-label randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there an increase in the total number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes between a conventional ovarian stimulation (OS) and a double uninterrupted stimulation? SUMMARY ANSWER: There is no increase in the total number of MII oocytes when comparing one conventional OS to a continuous stimulation with double oocyte aspiration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Based on the concept of multiple follicular waves, the combination of two stimulations in the same ovarian cycle has gained interest in patients with a low ovarian reserve. This so-called dual stimulation approach is usually characterized by a discontinuation of FSH administration for ∼5 days and appears to have a favourable impact on the number of retrieved oocytes without affecting the embryo quality or ploidy status. The outcomes of dual uninterrupted OS have not yet been studied. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) with superiority design, performed in a single tertiary centre. Subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups between October 2019 and September 2021. All patients underwent a conventional stimulation with recombinant FSH. When two or more follicles of 17 mm were present, the final inclusion criterion was assessed; randomization occurred only in the presence of ≤9 follicles of ≥11 mm. In Group A, ovulation was triggered with hCG, and oocyte retrieval (OR) was performed 34-36 h later, followed by a fresh single or double embryo transfer (SET or DET) on Day 3/5. In Group B, ovulation was triggered with GnRH agonist, followed by another OS, without discontinuation of the FSH administration. In the presence of one or more follicles of ≥17 mm, the second stimulation was completed with hCG. A freeze-all strategy (Day 3/5) was applied for both retrievals, followed by transfer of one or two embryos in an artificially prepared frozen-thawed cycle. In the absence of one or more follicles of ≥17 mm after 13 additional days of stimulation, the second cycle was cancelled. All ORs were executed by a senior fertility specialist who was blinded for the first treatment, and all follicles >10 mm were aspirated, according to routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was the total number of MII oocytes. Patients were followed up until all embryos were transferred, or until live birth was achieved. Other secondary outcomes included the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), the number of good quality embryos (Day 3/5), the ongoing pregnancy rate, and gonadotropin consumption. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients between 25 and 40 years old, with an anti-Müllerian hormone level of ≤1.5 ng/ml, antral follicle count of ≤6, or ≤5 oocytes after a previous stimulation, were included. At the start, 70 patients were eligible for participation in the trial, of whom 48 patients fulfilled the final inclusion criterium and were randomized. After drop-out of two patients, 23 patients were randomized to a single round of OS (Group A), and 23 patients were randomized to two uninterrupted rounds of OS (Group B). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. The cumulative number of COCs and MII oocytes after completion of the second OR was similar in Group A and Group B [5.3 ± 2.7 versus 5.3 ± 3.0 (P = 0.95); 4.1 ± 2.4 versus 4.3 ± 2.7 (P = 0.77)]. Likewise, a comparable number of excellent and good quality embryos was available on Day 3 (3.0 ± 2.0 versus 2.7 ± 2.0; P = 0.63). In Group B, the cancellation rate due to insufficient response to the second round of stimulation was 39.1% (9/23). When focusing on the first stimulation in both groups, there were no significant differences regarding basal FSH, gonadotropin consumption, and the number of preovulatory follicles. After the first OR, the mean number of COC and MII oocytes was significantly higher in Group A (who had hCG triggering), compared to Group B (who had GnRH agonist triggering) [5.3 ± 2.7 versus 3.3 ± 2.2; difference 95% CI (0.54 to 3.45), P = 0.004 and 4.1 ± 2.4 versus 3.0 ± 2.2; difference 95% CI (-0.15 to 2.6), P = 0.05, respectively]. Likewise, the number of excellent and good quality embryos on Day 3 was significantly higher (3.0 ± 2.0 versus 1.9 ± 1.7; P = 0.02) in Group A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was powered to demonstrate superiority for the number of MII oocytes after dual stimulation. Investigating the impact of dual stimulation on pregnancy rates would have required a larger sample size. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in embryo vitrification and transfer policies precluded a correct comparison of embryologic outcomes between both groups. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This is the first RCT investigating the role of continuous stimulation with double aspiration in low responders. Our results show no statistically significant differences in the cumulative number of MII oocytes between one conventional stimulation with fresh ET and two consecutive stimulations with a freeze-only approach. Furthermore, the observed suboptimal oocyte yield after agonist ovulation triggering in low responders in the dual uninterrupted OS group is a reason for concern and further scrutiny, given that previous RCTs have shown similar outcomes in normal and high responders after hCG and GnRH agonist triggers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported in part by a research grant from Organon. H.T. received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, Cook, Goodlife, and Ferring. L.B. received fees for lectures from Merck & Organon and support for attending ESHRE 2023. M.D.V. reports fees for lectures from Ferring, Merck, Organon, IBSA, Gedeon Richter, and Cooper Surgical and support for attending ASRM 2023. S.M. received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Cooper Surgical, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck. C.B. was on the Advisory board and received consulting fees from Theramex and received honoraria for lectures and presentations from Abbott, Ferring, Gedeon-Richter, IBSA, and Merck. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03846544. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 19 February 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 28 October 2019.

Clinical factors associated with unexpected poor or suboptimal response in Poseidon criteria patients.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What clinical factors are associated with 'unexpected' poor or suboptimal responses to IVF ovarian stimulation per POSEIDON's criteria, and which AMH and AFC threshold values distinguish this population? DESIGN: Tri-centre retrospective cohort study (2015-2017) involving first-time IVF and ICSI cycles with conventional ovarian stimulation (≥150 IU/day of FSH). Eligibility criteria included sufficient ovarian reserve markers according to POSEIDON's classification (AMH ≥1.2 ng/ml; AFC ≥5). Ovarian response categories were poor (<4 oocytes), suboptimal (4-9 oocytes) and normal (≥9 oocytes). Primary outcomes included clinical factors associated with an unexpected poor or suboptimal response to conventional ovarian stimulation using logistic regression analyses, and the threshold values of AMH and AFC predicting increased risk of such responses using ROC curves. RESULTS: A total of 7625 patients met the inclusion criteria: 204 (9.3%) were poor and 1998 (90.7%) were suboptimal responders. Logistic regression identified significant clinical predictors for a poor or suboptimal response, including AFC, AMH, total gonadotrophin dose, gonadotrophin type and trigger type (P ≤ 0.02). The ROC curves indicated that AMH 2.87 ng/ml (AUC 0.740) and AFC 12 (AUC 0.826) were the threshold values predicting a poor or suboptimal response; AMH 2.17 ng/ml (AUC 0.741) and AFC 9 (AUC 0.835) predicted a poor response; and AMH 2.97 ng/ml (AUC 0.722) and AFC 12 (AUC 0.801) predicted a suboptimal response. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold values of AMH and AFC predicting 'unexpected' poor or suboptimal response were higher than expected. These findings have critical implications for tailoring IVF stimulation regimens and dosages.

A randomized, non-inferiority trial on the DuoStim strategy in PGT-A cycles.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the DuoStim strategy an effective alternative to two conventional ovarian stimulation cycles in poor-prognosis patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) to improve euploidy rates and obtain the first euploid embryo in less time? DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was performed at IVI Madrid between June 2017 and December 2020 and included 80 patients with a suboptimal profile aged 38 or older undergoing PGT-A cycles. Patients were blindly randomized into two groups: 39 women underwent two ovarian stimulations in consecutive cycles (control group), whereas the double stimulation strategy was applied to 41 women (DuoStim group). The main outcome was the euploidy rate in each group. The secondary outcomes were the time it took to obtain a euploid embryo and the main cycle outcomes. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar. No differences were found between the control group and the DuoStim group in the mean days of stimulation (21.3 ± 1.6 versus 23.0 ± 1.4, P = 0.10), total gonadotrophins (4005 ± 450 versus 4245 ± 430, P = 0.43), metaphase II oocytes (8.7 ± 1.8 versus 6.8 ± 1.7, P = 0.15) or euploid embryos obtained (0.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.6 ± 0.4, P = 0.45). The euploid rate per randomized patient (ITT) was 16.1% in the control group versus 22.7% in the DuoStim group, with P-values of 0.371, and the euploidy rate per patient treated was 39.0% versus 45.7% in the control versus DuoStim groups. However, there was a significant difference in the average number of days it took to obtain a euploid blastocyst, favouring the DuoStim group (44.1 ± 2.0 versus 23.3 ± 2.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the DuoStim strategy in poor-prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A cycles maintains a similar euploidy rate while reducing the time required to obtain a euploid blastocyst.

Ultra-low-dose and very-low-dose Lupron downregulation protocols for poor responders based on POSEIDON group 3 and 4 classifications.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess if very-low-dose Lupron (VLDL) and ultra-low-dose Lupron (ULDL) protocols can have comparable cycle outcomes when compared to other "poor responder" stimulation protocols based on POSEIDON classification groups 3 (PG3) and 4 (PG4). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a single, large academic center was performed. Women in PG3 (age < 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) or PG4 (age ≥ 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) undergoing in vitro fertilization using an ULDL (Lupron 0.1 to 0.05 mg daily), VLDL (Lupron 0.2 to 0.1 mg daily), microflare (Lupron 0.05 mg twice a day), estradiol priming/antagonist, antagonist, or minimal stimulation protocols from 2012 to 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocytes (MII) obtained. The secondary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). RESULTS: The cohort included 3601 cycles. The mean age was 38.1 ± 3.8 years. In the PG3 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols produced a comparable number of MIIs (5.8 ± 4.3 and 5.9 ± 5.4, respectively) and live births (33.3% and 33.3%, respectively) when compared to other protocols. In the PG4 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols resulted in a higher percentage of MIIs when compared to microflare or minimal stimulation (Microflare/ULDL: adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.78 (95% CI 0.65, 0.95); min stim/ULDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.58); microflare/VLDL: aRR 0.77 (95% CI 0.63, 0.95); min stim/VLDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.95)). There were no significant differences in LBR. CONCLUSION: Dilute Lupron downregulation protocols have comparable outcomes to other poor responder protocols and are reasonable to use.

A mathematical model to identify optimal combinations of drug targets for dupilumab poor responders in atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Several biologics for atopic dermatitis (AD) have demonstrated good efficacy in clinical trials, but with a substantial proportion of patients being identified as poor responders. This study aims to understand the pathophysiological backgrounds of patient variability in drug response, especially for dupilumab, and to identify promising drug targets in dupilumab poor responders. METHODS: We conducted model-based meta-analysis of recent clinical trials of AD biologics and developed a mathematical model that reproduces reported clinical efficacies for nine biological drugs (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, tralokinumab, secukinumab, fezakinumab, nemolizumab, tezepelumab, GBR 830, and recombinant interferon-gamma) by describing system-level AD pathogenesis. Using this model, we simulated the clinical efficacy of hypothetical therapies on virtual patients. RESULTS: Our model reproduced reported time courses of %improved EASI and EASI-75 of the nine drugs. The global sensitivity analysis and model simulation indicated the baseline level of IL-13 could stratify dupilumab good responders. Model simulation on the efficacies of hypothetical therapies revealed that simultaneous inhibition of IL-13 and IL-22 was effective, whereas application of the nine biologic drugs was ineffective, for dupilumab poor responders (EASI-75 at 24 weeks: 21.6% vs. max. 1.9%). CONCLUSION: Our model identified IL-13 as a potential predictive biomarker to stratify dupilumab good responders, and simultaneous inhibition of IL-13 and IL-22 as a promising drug therapy for dupilumab poor responders. This model will serve as a computational platform for model-informed drug development for precision medicine, as it allows evaluation of the effects of new potential drug targets and the mechanisms behind patient variability in drug response.

Does LH supplementation in poor responders affect granulosa cells apoptosis rate in ART? A prospective randomised controlled trial.

The aim was to compare granulosa cell's (GCs) apoptosis rate with (group A) or without (group B) luteinising hormone (LH) supplementation in poor ovarian responders (PORs) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). After oocyte retrieval, the follicular fluid was analysed by cytoflowmetry. Primary outcomes were GCs apoptosis rate in terms of viability, early apoptosis, late apoptosis and necrosis. Secondary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. The viability was 96.7{IQR: 8} and 83.5{IQR: 20} for groups A and B, respectively (p < .001). Late apoptosis rates were significantly lower in group A (median 1.5, {IQR: 3.1}) than group B (median 9.5, {IQR: 20.6}) (p < .001). Median early apoptosis rates were 1.4 {IQR: 2.9} and 5.2 {IQR: 6.5} for group A and B respectively (p = .04). No significant difference was observed in the clinical pregnancy rate. Although LH seems necessary in PORs to decrease late granulosa apoptosis rates, this does not improve clinical pregnancy rates.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? LH supplementation during COS has long been an issue in PORs to overcome the rFSH responsiveness due to the LH polymorphism. LH receptors have also been on GCs and their expression increases in preovulatory follicles. GCs apoptosis rates may show the oocyte quality and reproductive potential of oocyte retrieved and the requirement for LH supplementation.What do the results of this study add? The present study shows that LH supplementation during COS for PORs promotes the GC viability and reduces early/late apoptosis rates. Similarly, the number of MII oocytes was significantly higher in the LH regimen group. However, there was no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rates.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The oocyte quality parameters such as higher GC viability and lower GC early/late apoptosis rates verify the LH supplementation in PORs during COS. However, the limited size of this study requires further multi-centre research in a larger cohort of patients. Results obtained with a sensitive and validated method will help clinicians to make better decisions in patient care.

Expression of genes that regulate follicle development and maturation during ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androgen receptor (AR), LH beta polypeptide (LHB), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and progesterone receptor membrane component 2 (PGRMC2) regulate follicle development and maturation. Their mRNA expression was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of normal and poor responders, during ovarian stimulation. DESIGN: Fifty-two normal responders and 15 poor responders according to the Bologna criteria were enrolled for IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and stimulated with 200 IU of follitrophin alpha and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist. HCG was administered for final oocyte maturation. On days 1, 6 and 10 of stimulation, blood samples were obtained, serum hormone levels were measured, RNA was extracted from PBMC and real-time polymerase chain reaction was carried out to identify the mRNA levels. Relative mRNA expression of each gene was calculated by the comparative 2-DDCt method. RESULTS: Differences between mRNA levels of each gene on the same time point between the two groups were not significant. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA levels were downregulated, adjusted for ovarian response and age. Positive correlations between PGRMC1 and AR (standardized beta = 0.890, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 6 and PGRMC1 and LHB (standardized beta = 0.806, P < 0.001) from day 1 to 10 were found in poor responders. PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 were positively correlated on days 6 and 10 in normal responders. CONCLUSIONS: PGRMC1 and PGRMC2 mRNA are significantly decreased during ovarian stimulation, with some potential differences between normal and poor responders.

Four consecutive minimal ovarian stimulation (TetraStim) is a feasible alternative to increase the number of oocytes and improve live birth rates in poor responders who do not accept oocyte donation.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience using four consecutive minimal COS (TetraStim) followed by oocyte retrieval and vitrification to increase the number of oocytes in patients with POR for whom oocyte donation is not an option. METHODS: We performed an observational study evaluating 128 poor responders submitted to TetraStim instead of oocyte donation cycles. Patients were submitted to four consecutive minimal COS started at luteal phase, oocyte retrieval, oocyte vitrification/warming, ICSI, endometrial priming and embryo transfer. We evaluated the number of vitrified oocytes, survival rate after warming, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, number of embryos transferred, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.1 ± 3.1 years. A total of 791 oocytes were recovered (6.1 ± 2.7/patient), 682 (86.2%) Metaphase II (5.3 ± 2.4/patient) were vitrified, 95.3% survived warming (5.1 ± 2.3/patient), 82% showed normal fertilization after ICSI (4.2 ± 2/patient), 79.2% reached cleavage stage (3.3 ± 1.6/patient), 313 cleavage stage embryos were transferred to 115 patients (2.7 ± 0.7/patient) and 14.7% of the patients had surplus embryos that were vitrified. Clinical pregnancy rate per patient was 31.3% and live birth rate per patient was 22.6%. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the first study that demonstrates that TetraStim can be an effective alternative for patients with POR with an indication to perform IVF with donated oocytes, but do not agree to use. TetraStim is a feasible alternative to increase the number of oocytes and embryos and improve pregnancy rates with no dropouts and very low cycle cancelation rate. However, randomized controlled studies must be performed to compare TetraStim with other treatments.

A Novel Stimulation Protocol for Poor-Responder Patients: Combining the Stop GnRH-ag Protocol with Letrozole Priming and Multiple-Dose GnRH-ant: A Proof of Concept.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether the combined Stop GnRH-agonist (GnRH-ag), letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol may improve in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in poor ovarian responders (PORs). DESIGN: This was a historical cohort, proof of concept study under tertiary setting at University affiliated Medical Center. PATIENTS: Five PORs fulfilling the POSEIDON Group 4 criteria were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of oocytes retrieved, number of top-quality embryos (TQEs), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) variables were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: The combined Stop GnRH-ag, letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-ant COH protocol revealed significantly higher number of follicles >13 mm on the day of hCG administration and higher number of oocytes retrieved, with non-significantly more TQEs and a reasonable clinical pregnancy rate. CONCLUSIONS: The combined Stop GnRH-ag, letrozole priming, and multiple-dose GnRH-ant COH protocol is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for treating POSEIDON Group 4 patients. Further large prospective studies are needed to elucidate its role in POR and to identify the specific characteristics of women (before initiating ovarian stimulation) that will aid both fertility specialists' counseling and their patients in adjusting the appropriate COH protocol.

ART outcomes following ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of luteal phase ovarian stimulation (LPS) on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for infertile couples and patients desiring non-urgent egg cryopreservation. METHODS: We included all studies reported patients who received LPS and that used follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPS) as a comparison group until January 2021. Prior meta-analysis regarding the outcomes of LPS in double stimulation and fertility preservation have already been published, so these studies were excluded. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions was used to assess the study quality. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (CRD42020183946). RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 4433 patients were included. The regimen employed can be categorized into two groups, but there is currently no evidence to support one over the other. After we excluded the largest study, the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were similar after FPS and LPS. There were significantly more stimulation days and total gonadotropins used in the LPS group. After subgroup analysis, we found that poor responders received significantly more cumulus oocyte complexes (+0.64) in the LPS group. CONCLUSION: Current evidence indicates that patients in the LPS group could achieve pregnancy outcomes non-inferior to those in the FPS group. Because of current debate over freeze-all policy and the limited data about live birth rate, the universal use of LPS is considered controversial. In the future, more well-designed studies are necessary to investigate the indications for LPS and its cost-effectiveness.

Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether minimal ovarian stimulation (mOS) is as effective as conventional ovarian stimulation (cOS) for older women belonging to different groups according to the Poseidon criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective multicentre cohort including women from Poseidon's groups 2 and 4 that underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). We performed a mixed-effects logistic regression model, adding as a random effect the patients and the stimulation cycle considering the dependence of data. Survival curves were employed as a measure of the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The primary outcomes were live birth rate per embryo transfer and CLBR per consecutive embryo transfer and oocyte consumed until a live birth was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 2002 patients underwent 3056 embryo transfers (mOS = 497 and cOS = 2559). The live birth rates per embryo transfer in mOS and cOS showed no significant difference in both Poseidon's groups. Likewise, the logistic regression showed similar live birth rates between the two protocols in Poseidon's groups 2 (OR 1.165, 95% CI 0.77-1.77; p = 0.710) and 4 (OR 1.264 95% CI 0.59-2.70; p = 0.387). However, the survival curves showed higher CLBR per oocyte in women that received mOS (Poseidon group 2: p < 0.001 and Poseidon group 4: p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Minimal ovarian stimulation is a good alternative to COS as a first-line treatment for patients belonging to Poseidon's groups 2 and 4. The number of oocytes needed to achieve a live birth seems inferior in mOS strategy than cOS.

Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols.

PURPOSE: Considering the insufficient evidence supporting an ideal protocol for poor responder management in IVF/ICSI cycles, the aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare GnRH-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist protocols in poor responders, evaluating effectiveness and safety. METHODS: Meta-analysis was conducted using Medcalc 16.8 version software. Standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and the respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined appropriately. The Cochran Q statistic and the I2 test were used to assess studies' heterogeneity. RESULTS: GnRH-agonists were shown to correlate with fewer cancelled IVF/ICSI cycles (p = 0.044, OR = 1.268 > 1, 95% CI 1.007, 1.598), a larger number of embryos transferred (p = 0.008, SMD = - 0.230, 95% CI - 0.400, - 0.0599), and more clinical pregnancies (p = 0.018, OR = 0.748 < 1, 95% CI 0.588, 0.952). However, GnRH-antagonists resulted in a significantly shorter duration of ovarian stimulation (p = 0.007, SMD = - 0.426. 95% CI - 0.736, - 0.115). The number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved in both protocols did not differ statistically (p = 0.216, SMD = - 0.130, 95% CI - 0.337, 0.0763 and p = 0.807, SMD = - 0.0203, 95% CI - 0.183, 0.142, respectively). Moreover, a high heterogeneity among studies was observed regarding duration of ovarian stimulation (I2 = 90.6%), number of oocytes (I2 = 82.83%)/mature oocytes retrieved (I2 = 70.39%), and embryos transferred (I2 = 72.83%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present meta-analysis, agonist protocols could be suggested as a first choice approach, in terms of effectiveness. Due to the high studies' heterogeneity, results should be considered with caution. Accordingly, larger cohort studies and meta-analyses like the present one will enhance the robustness of the emerging results to identify the ideal protocol for poor responders.

SAY NO to mild ovarian stimulation for all poor responders: it is time to realize that not all poor responders are the same.

Over the last 25 years, a vast body of literature has been published evaluating different treatment modalities for the management of poor ovarian responders. Despite the evidence that maximizing ovarian response can improve the chances of live born babies in poor responders, there are still voices suggesting that all poor responders are the same, irrespective of their age and their actual ovarian reserve. This has resulted in the suggestion of adopting a mild ovarian stimulation approach for all poor responders, based on the results of several trials which failed to identity differences when comparing mild and more intense stimulation in predicted poor responders. The current article analyzes in detail these studies and discusses the shortcomings in terms of type of population included, outcomes and settings performed, which may actually be responsible for the belief that only mild stimulation should be used. In the era of individualization in medicine, it must be realized that there are subgroups of predicted poor responders who will benefit from an individual rather than 'one fits all' mild stimulation approach and thus we should provide the same standard of treatment for all our poor responder patients.

Corifollitropin alfa for poor responders patients, a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Poor ovarian response remains one of the biggest challenges for reproductive endocrinologists. The introduction of corifollitropin alpha (CFA) offered an alternative option to other gonadotropins for its longer half-life, its more rapid achievement of the threshold and higher FSH levels. We compared two different protocols with CFA, a long agonist and a short antagonist, and a no-CFA protocol. METHODS: Patients enrolled fulfilled at least two of the followings: AFC < 5, AMH < 1,1 ng/ml, less than three oocytes in a previous cycle, age > 40 years. Ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol was performed either with 300 UI rFSH and 150 UI rLH or 300UI HMG. In the long agonist group, after pituitary suppression with triptorelin, CFA was given the 1-2th day of cycle and 300 UI rFSH and 150 UI rLH the 5th day. In the short antagonist group CFA was given the 1-2th day of cycle and 300 UI rFSH and 150 UI rLH the 5th day. The primary objective was the effect on the number of oocytes and MII oocytes. Secondary objective were pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancies and ongoing pregnancies per intention to treat. RESULTS: The use of CFA resulted in a shorter lenght of stimulation and a lower number of suspended treatments. Both the CFA protocols were significantly different from the no-CFA group in the number of retrieved oocytes (p < 0,05), with a non-significant difference in favour of the long agonist protocol. Both CFA groups yielded higher pregnancy rates, especially the long protocol, due to the higher number of oocytes retrieved (p < 0,05), as implantation rates did not differ. The cumulative pregnancy rate was also different, due to the higher number of cryopreserved blastocysts (p < 0,02). CONCLUSIONS: The long agonist protocol with the addition of rFSH and rLH showed the best results in all the parameters. A short antagonist protocol with CFA was less effective, but not significantly, although provided better results compared to the no-CFA group. We suggest that a long agonist protocol with CFA and recombinant gonadotropins might be a valuable option for poor responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (EudraCT2015-002817-31).

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mild ovarian stimulation is a treatment option for poor responders in IVF treatment. Our updated review evaluated mild IVF solely from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used genuine low-dose gonadotrophin (≤150 IU daily) alone or in combination with oral medications, comparing it with conventional-dose (>150 IU/ daily) IVF for poor responders. Electronic searches on MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PreMEDLINE, and hand searches from 2002 up to 31 January 2019, identified 14 RCTs, which were compiled with the above inclusion criteria. The risk of bias (ROB) and quality of evidence (QOE) were assessed as per Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analyses found no difference in live birth rate (four RCTs, n = 1057, RR 0.91, CI 0.66 to 1.25) (moderate QOE), ongoing pregnancy rate (six RCTs, n = 1782, RR 1.01, CI 0.86 to 1.20) (moderate-high QOE) and cycle cancellation rates (14 RCTs, n = 2746, RR 1.38, CI 0.99 to 1.92) (low QOE). Fewer oocytes and embryos were obtained from mild IVF; however, the number and proportion of high-grade embryos were similar. Mild IVF resulted in reduced gonadotrophin use and cost. The inference remained unchanged when smaller studies with ROB were excluded, or whether gonadotrophin alone or combination with oral medication was used. The evidence of equal efficacy from a pooled population, which was adequately powered for live birth, supported a mild IVF strategy for poor responders in preference to more expensive conventional IVF. Although clinical heterogeneity remained a limiting factor, it increased the generalizability of the findings.

Prediction of metaphase II oocytes according to different levels of serum AMH in poor responders using the antagonist protocol during ICSI: a cohort study.

The aim of our study was to assess the value of serum AMH in prediction of metaphase II oocytes in poor responders. We performed a prospective cohort study included 206 poor responders candidate for ICSI using antagonist protocol. They were classified into 3 groups. Group I included 50 women with AMH < 0.3 ng/ml, group II included 85 women with AMH 0.3-0.7 ng/ml and group III included 71 women with AMH > 0.7-1.0 ng/ml. The primary outcome parameter was the number of MII oocytes. There was a highly significant difference between the study groups regarding E2 at triggering (481.41 ± 222.653, 648.17 ± 264.353 and 728.74 ± 305.412 respectively, number of oocyte retrieved (2.37 ± 1.178, 3.38 ± 1.622 and 3.80 ± 1.427 respectively), number of MII oocytes (1.66 ± 1.039, 2.35 ± 1.171 and 2.61 ± 1.080 respectively), number of fertilized oocytes (1.39 ± 0.919, 1.91 ± 0.983 and 2.21 ± 0.937 respectively), , total number of embryos (1.34 ± 0.938, 1.76 ± 0.956 and 2.09 ± 0.907 respectively), clinical pregnancy rates (4.9 vs. 7.7 and 19.7% respectively). We concluded that AMH is a good predictor for number of MII oocytes in poor responders undergoing ICSI.

Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide data on the practice of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR). The authors assess cell-free DNA levels in follicular fluid (ff cfDNA) from poor responders undergoing natural cycles, and comparing it to respective data originating from follicular phase oocyte retrievals. METHODS: Forty-seven women were eligible for this prospective study. Participants were classified as poor responders based on Bologna criteria while being detected with a second follicular wave. Follicular fluid was collected and prepared for cfDNA extraction. Levels of cfDNA were quantified via Q-PCR employing the ALU115 and ALU247 primers. These primers are associated with apoptotic and necrotic events. Levels of ff cfDNA resulting from follicular phase oocyte retrieval (FoPOR) and LuPOR-performed in a single menstrual cycle were associated with the number and maturation status of yielded oocytes and the number and fertilization status of resulting zygotes. Survival rate following thawing of cryopreserved zygotes, along with the resulting number of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos are provided. RESULTS: Mean levels of ALU115 were significantly lower during FoPOR when compared to LuPOR (0.79 ± 0.72 vs 1.46 ± 1.59 ng/µl, p = 0.02). Regarding the FoPOR group, a significant positive correlation of serum estradiol and ALU115 concentration (p = 0.04) was revealed. A significant negative correlation between serum estradiol and cfDNA integrity was observed both during FoPOR (p = 0.03) and LuPOR (p = 0.03). A significant lower number of retrieved (1.09 ± 0.28 vs 1.29 ± 0.58, p = 0.02) and MII oocytes (0.77 ± 0.55 vs 1.08 ± 0.61, p = 0.02) was observed when comparing the FoPOR to LuPOR groups respectively. The integrity of cfDNA was observed to be higher in FoPOR originating embryos that arrested either prior to cleavage (0.28 ± 0.13 vs 0.17 ± 0.10, p = 0.006) or prior to blastocyst formation (0.28 ± 0.12 vs 0.13 ± 0.06, p = 0.04). In the case of LuPOR originating embryos, cfDNA integrity was observed to be higher in embryos that arrested only prior to the blastocyst stage (0.27 ± 0.20 vs 0.11 ± 0.07, p = 0.008). Similarly, cfDNA integrity was observed to be lower in top quality blastocysts originating from FoPOR (0.07 ± 0.04 vs 0.17 ± 0.05, p = 0.03) and in top quality cleavage stage embryos (0.09 ± 0.06 vs 0.31 ± 0.22, p = 0.01) and blastocysts (0.06 ± 0.02 vs 0.14 ± 0.06, p = 0.02) originating from LuPOR. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ff originating from LuPOR presents with higher levels of cfDNA. The higher cfDNA levels are attributed to mainly apoptotic events, as the ALU247 levels and DNA integrity did not differ statistically significantly between FoPOR and LuPOR. The absolute mean level of ALU247 corresponding to necrotic events was higher in LuPOR. Regarding embryological data, cfDNA integrity was correlated with both number and quality of cleavage stage embryos in both FoPOR and LuPOR, along with blastocyst stage embryos in LuPOR. Necrotic events were associated with poorer blastocyst formation rate and blastocyst quality in LuPOR. As the comparison between FoPOR and LuPOR results to similar IVF laboratory data, the practice of LuPOR may stand as a promising approach for poor responders, while it merits further investigation.

Biopsying, fragmentation and autotransplantation of fresh ovarian cortical tissue in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve.

STUDY QUESTION: Can ovarian biopsying per se and/or autotransplantation of fragmented ovarian cortical tissue activate dormant follicles and increase the number of recruitable follicles for IVF/ICSI in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian biopsying followed by immediate autotransplantation of fragmented cortical tissue failed to increase the number of recruitable follicles for IVF/ICSI 10 weeks after the procedure either at the graft site or in the biopsied ovary, but 12 of the 20 women subsequently had a clinical pregnancy during the 1-year follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infertile women with DOR constitute a group of patients with poor reproductive outcome mainly due to the low number of mature oocytes available for IVF/ICSI. Recent studies have shown that in vitro activation of residual dormant follicles by both chemical treatment and tissue fragmentation has resulted in return of menstrual cycles and pregnancies in a fraction of amenorrhoeic women with premature ovarian insufficiency. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective clinical cohort study including 20 women with DOR treated at the fertility clinic, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, during April 2016-December 2017. Non-pregnant patients were on average followed for 280 days (range 118-408), while women who conceived were followed until delivery. Study follow-up of non-pregnant patients ended in September 2018. PARTICIPANTS, MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included infertile women aged 30-39 years with preserved menstrual cycles, indication for IVF/ICSI and repeated serum measurements of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤ 5 pmol/L. Patients were randomized to have four biopsies taken from either the left or the right ovary by laparoscopy followed by fragmentation of the cortical tissue to an approximate size of 1 mm3 and autotransplanted to a peritoneal pocket. The other ovary served as a control. Patients were followed weekly for 10 weeks with recording of hormone profile, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume and assessment for ectopic follicle growth. After 10 weeks, an IVF/ICSI-cycle with maximal ovarian stimulation was initiated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No difference in the number of mature follicles after ovarian stimulation 10 weeks after the procedure in the biopsied versus the control ovaries was observed (1.0 vs. 0.7 follicles, P = 0.35). In only three patients, growth of four follicles was detected at the graft site 24-268 days after the procedure. From one of these follicles, a metaphase II (MII) oocyte was retrieved and fertilized, but embryonic development failed. Overall AMH levels did not change significantly after the procedure (P = 0.2). The AFC increased by 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06;0.21) per week (P < 0.005), and the biopsied ovary had on average 0.6 (95% CI: 0.3;-0.88) follicles fewer than the control ovary (P = 0.01). Serum levels of androstenedione and testosterone increased significantly by 0.63 nmol/L (95% CI: 0.21;1.04) and 0.11 nmol/L (95% CI: 0.01;0.21) 1 week after the procedure, respectively, and testosterone increased consecutively over the 10 weeks by 0.0095 nmol/L (95% CI: 0.0002;0.0188) per week (P = 0.045). In 7 of the 20 patients, there was a serum AMH elevation 5 to 8 weeks after the procedure. In this group, mean AMH increased from 2.08 pmol/L (range 1.74-2.34) to 3.94 pmol/L (range 3.66-4.29) from Weeks 1-4 to Weeks 5-8. A clinical pregnancy was obtained in 12 of the 20 (60%) patients with and without medically assisted reproduction (MAR) treatments. We report a cumulated live birth rate per started IVF/ICSI cycle of 18.4%. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: Limitations of the study were the number of patients included and the lack of a non-operated control group. Moreover, 9 of the 20 women had no male partner at inclusion and were treated with donor sperm, but each of these women had an average of 6.8 (range 4-9) unsuccessful MAR treatments with donor sperm prior to inclusion. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Although 12 out of 20 patients became pregnant during the follow-up period, the current study does not indicate that biopsying, fragmenting and autotransplanting of ovarian cortical tissue increase the number of recruitable follicles for IVF/ICSI after 10 weeks. However, a proportion of the patients may have a follicular response in Weeks 5-8 after the procedure. It could therefore be relevant to perform a future study on the possible effects of biopsying per se that includes stimulation for IVF/ICSI earlier than week 10. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study is part of the ReproUnion collaborative study, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or decision to submit the work for publication. None of the authors have a conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02792569.

Dual stimulation using corifollitropin alfa in 54 Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders - a case series.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the reproductive outcomes of Bologna criteria poor responders undergoing dual stimulation (DuoStim) and subsequent cryopreserved embryo transfer? DESIGN: Case series of patients treated during the period August 2015 to March 2018 in a public fertility clinic. The study included 54 Bologna criteria poor responder IVF patients younger than 42 years receiving a follicular stimulation (DuoStim 1) followed by a luteal phase stimulation (DuoStim 2) within the same cycle, both stimulations being performed with corifollitropin alfa followed by a subsequent cryopreserved embryo transfer cycle. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved in DuoStim 1 compared with DuoStim 2. The secondary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) at 12 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in DuoStim 1 and DuoStim 2 was 2.4 ± 2.1 versus 3.7 ± 2.6, respectively; thus, a total of 1.2 (95% CI, 0.46-1.96) more oocytes was retrieved in DuoStim 2 compared with DuoStim 1 (P = 0.002). The OPR at 12 weeks was 20% (11/54) in this poor ovarian response population with a mean age of 36.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Luteal phase stimulation results in more oocytes in poor responders compared with follicular phase stimulation. DuoStim, using corifollitropin alfa followed by individualized FSH dosing, appears to be an alternative to conventional follicular phase stimulation, decreasing the risk of cycle cancellation.

Pituitary suppression protocol among Bologna poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa: does it play any role?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the type of pituitary suppression protocol influence cumulative live birth rate (LBR) in Bologna poor responders treated with corifollitropin alfa (CFA)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis including poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria who underwent their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle using a CFA-based ovarian stimulation protocol between 2011 and 2017. The starting dose of CFA was 150 µg. The primary outcome was cumulative LBR, defined as the first delivery of a live born resulting from the fresh and all the subsequent frozen embryo transfers. RESULTS: A total of 717 cycles were divided into three groups: A (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist protocol, n = 407), B (long GnRH agonist protocol, n = 224) and C (short GnRH agonist protocol, n = 86). Cumulative LBR did not significantly differ between groups (20.1% versus 17.4% versus 14.0%; P = 0.35). Significantly more patients in Group A had supernumerary embryos cryopreserved (28.3% versus 18.4% versus 11.6%; P < 0.001). Days of additional highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin 300 IU injections following CFA were significantly different between Groups A, B and C (3 versus 5 versus 3 days; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the number of oocytes retrieved remained an independent predictive factor (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.31) for cumulative LBR. CONCLUSIONS: Poor responders according to the Bologna criteria in whom CFA is used for ovarian stimulation had comparable cumulative LBR, irrespective of the type of pituitary suppression. An increase in number of oocytes retrieved is an independent variable related to cumulative LBR.