Efficacy, feasibility and tolerability of ketogenic diet for the treatment of poor response to bariatric surgery.

PURPOSE: Poor response to bariatric surgery, namely insufficient weight loss (IWL) or weight regain (WR), is a critical issue in the treatment of obesity. The purpose of our study was to assess the efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) for the management of this condition. METHODS: A real-life prospective study was conducted on twenty-two patients who experienced poor response after bariatric surgery and followed a structured VLCKD. Anthropometric parameters, body composition, muscular strength, biochemical analyses, and nutritional behavior questionnaires were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant weight loss (mean 14.1 ± 4.8%), mostly due to fat mass, was observed during VLCKD with the preservation of muscular strength. The weight loss obtained allowed patients with IWL to reach a body weight significantly lower than that obtained at the post-bariatric surgery nadir and to report the body weight of patients with WR at the nadir observed after surgery. The significantly beneficial changes in nutritional behaviors and metabolic profiles were observed without variations in kidney and liver function, vitamins, and iron status. The nutritional regimen was well tolerated, and no significant side effects were detected. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the efficacy, feasibility, and tolerability of VLCKD in patients with poor response after bariatric surgery.

Factors influencing poor response to type 2 targeted therapies in severe asthma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A significant breakthrough has been made in treating severe asthma, with the recognition of various asthma phenotypes and an updated management guideline. Type 2 targeted therapies, such as benralizumab and omalizumab; have been identified as an effective treatment for severe asthma, improving patient response, lung function tests and asthma symptom control. This study aimed to evaluate factors contributing to poor response to therapy. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study of 162 patients with severe asthma who started biologic therapy; their data were retrieved from medical records for further analysis. Poor responders were patients remained clinically and functionally uncontrolled despite even after augmenting all treatment options. RESULTS: Childhood-onset asthma, bronchiectasis, poor symptom control (ACT below 19), severe airway obstruction (< 60% predicted), and maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use were significantly associated with poor response to omalizumab and benralizumab; p = 0.0.4 and 0.01; 0.003 and 0.01; 0.01 and 0.001, 0.05 and 0.04; 0.006 and 0.02, respectively. However, chronic rhinosinusitis and IgE < 220kIU/L were associated with higher poor response rates to omalizumab (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). At the same time, female patients and those with blood eosinophils level < 500 cells/mm3 had a higher poor response rate to benralizumab (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and continued use of OCS increased the likelihood of poor response to omalizumab by 21, 7, and 24 times (p = 0.004, 0.008, and 0.004, respectively). In contrast, the female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher BMI increased the likelihood of poor response to benralizumab by 7, 7 and 2 times more, p = 0.03, 0.02 and 0.05, respectively. CONCLUSION: Poor response to omalizumab treatment was independently associated with ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and a history of maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use. Conversely, poor response to benralizumab therapy was independently linked to female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher body mass index (BMI).

Idiopathic early ovarian ageing: risk of miscarriage and chance of delivery following ART in a nationwide cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is idiopathic reduced ovarian reserve in young women, quantified as low response to ovarian stimulation in ART, associated with a concomitant loss of oocyte quality as determined by risk of pregnancy loss and chance of clinical pregnancy and live birth? SUMMARY ANSWER: Young women with idiopathic accelerated loss of follicles exhibit a similar risk of pregnancy loss as young women with normal ovarian reserve. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Normal ovarian ageing is described as a concomitant decline in oocyte quantity and quality with increasing age. Conflicting results exist with regard to whether a similar decline in oocyte quality also follows an accelerated loss of follicles in young women. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This national register-based, historical cohort study included treatment cycles from young women (≤37 years) after ART treatment in Danish public or private fertility clinics during the period 1995-2014. The women were divided into two groups dependent on their ovarian reserve status: early ovarian ageing (EOA) group and normal ovarian ageing (NOA) group. There were 2734 eligible cycles in the EOA group and 22 573 in the NOA group. Of those, 1874 (n = 1213 women) and 19 526 (n = 8814 women) cycles with embryo transfer were included for analyses in the EOA and NOA group, respectively. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: EOA was defined as ≤5 oocytes harvested in both the first and second cycle stimulated with FSH. The NOA group should have had at least two FSH-stimulated cycles with ≥8 oocytes harvested in either the first or the second cycle. Cases with known causes influencing the ovarian reserve (endometriosis, ovarian surgery, polycystic ovary syndrome, chemotherapy, etc.) were excluded. The oocyte quality was evaluated by the primary outcome defined as the overall risk of pregnancy loss (gestational age (GA) ≤22 weeks) following a positive hCG and further stratified into: non-visualized pregnancy loss, early miscarriage (GA ≤ 12 weeks) and late miscarriage (GA > 12 weeks). Secondary outcomes were chance of clinical pregnancy and live birth per embryo transfer. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of pregnancy loss. Time-to-event was measured from the day of embryo transfer from the second cycle and subsequent cycles. Logistic regression models were used to assess the chance of clinical pregnancy and live birth. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The overall risk of pregnancy loss for the EOA group was comparable with the NOA group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.86; 1.26). Stratifying by pregnancy loss types showed comparable risks in the EOA and NOA group. The odds of achieving a clinical pregnancy or live birth per embryo transfer was lower in the EOA group compared to the NOA group (adjusted odds ratio: 0.77 (0.67; 0.88) and 0.78 (0.67; 0.90), respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only women with at least two ART cycles were included. We had no information on the total doses of gonadotropin administered in each cycle. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The present findings may indicate that mechanism(s) other than aneuploidy may explain the asynchrony between the normal-for-age risk of miscarriage and the reduced chance of implantation found in our patients with EOA. The results of this study could be valuable when counselling young patients with low ovarian reserve. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS(S): The study was funded by the Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Increased versus standard gonadotrophin dosing in predicted poor responders of IVF: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Does an increased dosing of FSH improve the live birth rate as compared to standard FSH dosing in expected poor responders who undergo IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER: In this trial, women with an expected poor response allocated to increased FSH dosing did not have a statistically significant increase in cumulative live births as compared to a standard FSH dose. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Poor ovarian reserve leads to worse IVF outcomes owing to the low number and quality of oocytes. Clinicians often individualize the FSH dose using ovarian reserve tests, including antral follicle count (AFC), and basal plasma FSH or anti-Müllerian hormone level. However, the evidence that increased FSH dosing improves fertility outcomes in women with an expected poor response is lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a parallel, open-label randomized controlled trial between March 2019 and October 2021 in an assisted reproduction centre. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women <43 years of age with AFC <10 referred for their first IVF cycle were randomized for increased or standard FSH dosing. In participants allocated to increased FSH dosing, women with AFC 1-6 started with 300 IU/day, while women with AFC 7-9 started with 225 IU/day. In participants allocated to the standard care, women started with 150 IU/day. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth attributable to the first IVF cycle including fresh and subsequent frozen-thawed cycles within 18 months of randomization. Live birth was defined as the delivery of one or more living infants ≥24 weeks' gestation. This trial was powered to detect an 11% difference in live birth attributable to the first IVF cycle. Outcomes were evaluated from an intention-to-treat perspective. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We randomized 661 women to start FSH at increased dosing (n = 328) or standard dosing (n = 333). The primary outcome cumulative live birth occurred in 162/328 (49.4%) women in the increased group versus 141/333 (42.3%) women in the standard group [risk ratio (RR) 1.17 (95% CI, 0.99-1.38), risk difference 0.07 (95% CI, -0.005, 0.15), P = 0.070]. The live birth rate after the first embryo transfer in the increased versus standard group was 125/328 (38.1%) versus 117/333 (35.1%), respectively [RR 1.08 (95% CI, 0.83-1.33), P = 0.428]. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rates were 59.1% versus 57.1% [RR 1.04 (95% CI, 0.91-1.18), P = 0.586] with miscarriage rates of 9.8% versus 14.4% [RR 0.68 (95% CI, 0.44-1.03), P = 0.069] in the increased versus standard group, respectively. Other secondary outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, multiple pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy, were not significantly different between the two groups both from the first and cumulative embryo transfer. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: As this study is open-label, potential selective cancelling and small dose adjustments could have influenced the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women with predicted poor response, we did not find evidence that increased FSH dosing improves live birth rates. A standard dose of 150 IU/day is recommended at the start of IVF in these women to reduce potential adverse effects and costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the General Projects of Social Development in Shaanxi Province (No. 2022SF-565). B.W.M. is supported by NHMRC (GNT1176437). B.W.M. reports personal fees from ObsEva, and funding from Merck and Ferring outside the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered at Chinese clinical trial registry (www.chictr.org.cn). Registration number ChiCTR1900021944. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 17 March 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 20 March 2019.

Non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review.

HIGHLIGHT: This is the first systematic review to investigate non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy is the recommended treatment for borderline personality disorder. While systematic reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder, effect sizes remain small and influenced by bias. Furthermore, the proportion of people who do not respond to treatment is seldom reported or analysed. OBJECTIVE: To obtain an informed estimate of the proportion of people who do not respond to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. METHODS: Systematic searches of five databases, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library, occurred in November 2020. Inclusion criteria: participants diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, treated with psychotherapy and data reporting either (a) the proportion of the sample that experienced 'reliable change' or (b) the percentage of sample that no longer met criteria for borderline personality disorder at conclusion of therapy. Exclusion criteria: studies published prior to 1980 or not in English. Of the 19,517 studies identified, 28 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in the review comprising a total of 2436 participants. Average treatment duration was 11 months using well-known evidence-based approaches. Approximately half did not respond to treatment; M = 48.80% (SD = 22.77). LIMITATIONS: Data regarding within sample variability and non-response are seldom reported. Methods of reporting data on dosage and comorbidities were highly divergent which precluded the ability to conduct predictive analyses. Other limitations include lack of sensitivity analysis, and studies published in English only. CONCLUSION: Results of this review suggest that a large proportion of people are not responding to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder and that factors relating to non-response are both elusive and inconsistently reported. Novel, tailored or enhanced interventions are needed to improve outcomes for individuals not responding to current established treatments.

Poor Ovarian Response to Gonadotrophins in PCOS Women after Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling.

Background and Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a major cause of anovulatory infertility, and ovulation induction is the first-line treatment. If this fails, laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is used to induce mono-ovulations. There have been implications, that LOD can cause destruction of ovarian tissue and therefore premature ovarian failure. Furthermore, unexpected poor ovarian response (POR) to gonadotrophins can occur in PCOS women after LOD. There have been reports about FSH receptor polymorphisms found in women with PCOS that are related to higher serum FSH levels and POR to gonadotrophins. Materials and Methods: In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed data of 144 infertile PCOS women that had LOD performed before IVF. Results: Thirty of included patients (20.8%) had POR (≤3 oocytes) to ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins. Women with POR had significantly higher median levels of basal serum FSH (7.2 (interquartile range (IQR), 6.0-9.2) compared to women with normal ovarian response (6.0 (IQR, 5.0-7.4); p = 0.006). Furthermore, women with POR used a significantly higher median cumulative dose of gonadotrophins (1875 IU (IQR, 1312.5-2400) for ovarian stimulation compared to women with normal ovarian response (1600 IU (IQR, 1200-1800); p = 0.018). Conclusion: Infertile PCOS women who experience POR after LOD have significantly higher serum FSH levels compared to women with normal ovarian response after LOD. As these levels are still within the normal range, we speculate that LOD is not the cause of POR. We presume that women with PCOS and POR after LOD could have FSH-R genotypes associated with POR and higher serum FSH levels.

Involvement of single nucleotide polymorphisms in ovarian poor response.

PURPOSE: Unpredictability in acquiring an adequate number of high-quality oocytes following ovarian stimulation is one of the major complications in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Genetic predispositions of variations could alter the immunological profiles and consequently be implicated in the variability of ovarian response to the stimulation. DESIGN: Uncovering the influence of variations in AMHR2, LHCGR, MTHFR, PGR, and SERPINE1 genes with ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation in COH of infertile women. METHODS: Blood samples of the women with a good ovarian response (GOR) or with a poor ovarian response (POR) were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted, and gene variations were genotyped by TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays using primer-probe sets or real-time PCR Kit. RESULTS: Except for PGR (rs10895068), allele distributions demonstrate that the majority of POR patients carried minor alleles of AMHR2 (rs2002555, G-allele), LHCGR (rs2293275, G-allele), MTHFR (rs1801131, C-allele, and rs1801133, T-allele), and SERPINE1 (rs1799889, 4G allele) genes compared to the GOR. Similarly, genotypes with a minor allele in AMHR2, LHCGR, MTHFR, and SERPINE1 genes had a higher prevalence among POR patients with the polymorphic genotypes. However, further genotype stratification indicated that the minor alleles of these genes are not associated with poor response. Multivariate logistic analysis of clinical-demographic factors and polymorphic genotypes demonstrated a correlation between FSH levels and polymorphic genotypes of SERPINE1 in poor response status. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher prevalence of AMHR2, LHCGR, MTHFR, and SERPINE1 variations in the patients with poor ovarian response, it seems that these variations are not associated with the ovarian response.

Endometrioma surgery is associated with increased risk of subsequent assisted reproductive technology cycle cancellation; a retrospective cohort study.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of laparoscopic removal of endometrioma on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital between January 2014 and December 2017. The ART group consisted of 26 women who underwent 44 ART cycles in the presence of ovarian endometrioma and the surgery group consisted of 53 women who underwent 58 ART cycles after laparoscopic removal of ovarian endometrioma/s. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding demographic parameters and background features including cycle parameters. The live birth rates in the ART and Surgery groups per embryo transfer were 23.7 and 26.1%, respectively (p = .800). The rate of cycle cancellation due to poor response and/or failed oocyte retrieval was significantly higher in the Surgery group than ART group (13.7 vs. 0%, respectively; p = .018). In conclusion, cystectomy significantly increases the risk of cycle cancellation due to poor ovarian response, which might be catastrophic individually. However, it does not seem to affect the live birth rates.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Both the presence of an endometrioma or surgical removal may have deleterious effects on fertility potential.What do the results of this study add? Our results confirm that although cystectomy has no benefit on the number of oocytes collected and live birth rate, it increases the risk of cycle cancellation significantly in assisted reproductive technology cycles following endometrioma surgery.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Postponing cystectomy until a freeze-all cycle may be the best option to maximise the number of oocytes retrieved and to maximise the ovarian response.

Early ovarian ageing: is a low number of oocytes harvested in young women associated with an earlier and increased risk of age-related diseases?

STUDY QUESTION: Do young women with early ovarian ageing (EOA), defined as unexplained, and repeatedly few oocytes harvested in ART have an increased risk of age-related events? SUMMARY ANSWER: At follow-up, women with idiopathic EOA had an increased risk of age-related events compared to women with normal ovarian ageing (NOA). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Early and premature menopause is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), osteoporosis and death. In young women, repeated harvest of few oocytes in well-stimulated ART cycles is a likely predictor of advanced menopausal age and may thus serve as an early marker of accelerated general ageing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A register-based national, historical cohort study. Young women (≤37 years) having their first ART treatment in a public or private fertility clinic during the period 1995-2014 were divided into two groups depending on ovarian reserve status: EOA (n = 1222) and NOA (n = 16 385). Several national registers were applied to assess morbidity and mortality. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: EOA was defined as ≤5 oocytes harvested in a minimum of two FSH-stimulated cycles and NOA as ≥8 oocytes in at least one cycle. Cases with known causes influencing the ovarian reserve (endometriosis, ovarian surgery, polycystic ovary syndrome, chemotherapy etc.) were excluded. To investigate for early signs of ageing, primary outcome was an overall risk of ageing-related events, defined as a diagnosis of either CVD, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, cancer, cataract, Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, by death of any-cause as well as a Charlson comorbidity index score of ≥1 or by registration of early retirement benefit. Cox regression models were used to assess the risk of these events. Exposure status was defined 1 year after the first ART cycle to assure reliable classification, and time-to-event was measured from that time point. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Median follow-up time from baseline to first event was 4.9 years (10/90 percentile 0.7/11.8) and 6.4 years (1.1/13.3) in the EOA and NOA group, respectively. Women with EOA had an increased risk of ageing-related events when compared to women with a normal oocyte yield (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.43). Stratifying on categories, the EOA group had a significantly increased risk for CVD (1.44, 1.19 to 1.75) and osteoporosis (2.45, 1.59 to 3.90). Charlson comorbidity index (1.15, 0.93 to 1.41) and early retirement benefit (1.21, 0.80 to 1.83) was also increased, although not reaching statistical significance. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Cycles never reaching oocyte aspiration were left out of account in the inclusion process and we may therefore have missed women with the most severe forms of EOA. We had no information on the total doses of gonadotrophin administered in each cycle. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings indicate that oocyte yield may serve as marker of later accelerated ageing when, unexpectedly, repeatedly few oocytes are harvested in young women. Counselling on life-style factors as a prophylactic effort against cardiovascular and other age-related diseases may be essential for this group of women. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was received for this study. All authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The effect of intra-ovarian androgen priming on ovarian reserve parameters in Bologna poor responders.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of long-term androgen priming in Bologna criteria poor ovarian reserve (POR) patients undergoing IVF? DESIGN: This open-label pilot study was conducted at IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. It included consecutive patients aged 18-41 years who fulfilled Bologna criteria for POR undergoing intra-ovarian androgen priming and ultra-long down-regulation with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), followed by stimulation with gonadotrophins and GnRH antagonist co-treatment for IVF (n = 30). Priming consisted of low-dose recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rHCG) 260 IU every second day plus letrozole 2.5 mg/day, both for 8 weeks; priming stopped on the first day of ovarian stimulation. The primary endpoint was serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration 8 weeks after priming. Secondary endpoints included antral follicle count (AFC) (2-10 mm), serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), testosterone and progesterone levels. RESULTS: Circulating testosterone, progesterone, oestradiol and HCG levels remained unchanged during androgen priming; the mean AMH level decreased steadily from 0.49 ng/ml (baseline) to 0.33 ng/ml (8 weeks). AFC was 4-5 throughout the study. A mean of 1.1 ± 0.9 good transferable embryos were obtained; embryo transfer was performed in 15 patients; no ongoing pregnancies were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term intra-ovarian androgen priming in the current set-up had no significant effect on hormone levels, AFC and recruitable follicles after ovarian stimulation in Bologna POR patients undergoing IVF. Further studies are needed to explore other androgen priming protocols and the clinical value of priming regimens in IVF.

Correlations Among Genotype and Outcome in Chinese Male Patients With Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Under HCG Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder characterized by absent or incomplete puberty and infertility, and heterogeneous responses are often observed during treatment. AIM: To investigate the role of CHH-associated variants in patients with CHH with poor responses to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). METHODS: This retrospective study investigated 110 Chinese male patients with CHH undergoing genetic analysis and hCG treatment. CHH-associated rare sequence variants (RSVs) were identified by using a tailored next-generation sequencing panel and were interpreted in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria. Clinical characteristics were recorded, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis was conducted to assess pathways enriched in protein networks implicated in poor responses. OUTCOMES: The outcomes include testicular volume, serum hormonal profiles, parameters of semen analysis, pathogenicity classification, and pathway enrichment. RESULTS: Among the 110 patients, 94.55% achieved normal serum testosterone and 54.55% achieved seminal spermatozoa appearance (SSA). PLXNB1, ROBO3, LHB, NRP2, CHD7, and PLXNA1 RSVs were identified in patients who had an abnormal serum testosterone level during treatment. In spermatogenesis, the number of CHH-associated RSVs was not significantly strongly associated with delayed SSA. After pathogenicity classification, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) RSVs were identified in 30% (33/110) of patients. Patients with P/LP RSVs showed delayed SSA compared with noncarriers, and P/LP PROKR2 RSVs showed the strongest association (48, 95% CI: 34.1-61.9 months, P = .043). Enriched pathways implicated in delayed SSA included neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction; Rap1, MAPK, PI3K-Akt signaling; and regulation of actin cytoskeleton. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Male patients with CHH harboring P/LP PROKR2 RSVs should be aware of a high probability of poor responses to hCG; If these patients desire fertility, it might be better to recommend hCG/human menopausal gonadotropin, hCG/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, or pulsatile GnRH administration before treatments start or as early as possible. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths are the standardized regimen and extensive follow-up (median time of 40 months). However, included patients in the study voluntarily chose hCG treatment because of the burden of drug cost and/or little fertility desire. Therefore, human menopausal gonadotropin or follicle-stimulating hormone was not added to this cohort. Our observed correlations should be further verified in patients with CHH undergoing other treatments. CONCLUSION: Among all P/LP RSVs, P/LP PROKR2 RSVs might correlate with poor responses in CHH under hCG treatment; our study supports the pathogenicity assessment of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria in genetic counseling, to improve management of patients with CHH. Chen Y, Sun T, Niu Y, et al. Correlations AmongGenotype and Outcome in Chinese Male Patients WithCongenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Under HCG Treatment. J Sex Med 2020;17:645-657.

Doxepin in difficult-to-treat chronic urticaria: A retrospective, cross-sectional study from Turkey.

Doxepin is an old tricyclic antidepressant, whose efficacy in chronic urticaria had been well documented until 1990. However, over the past three decades, there has been limited data on its use. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of doxepin in the treatment of patients with chronic urticaria who were poorly responsive to antihistamines. In this retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study from Turkey, data were examined from patients with chronic urticaria who had poor antihistamine responses and received doxepin therapy from 1998 to 2017. Patient data were analyzed with regard to the duration of the disease, age, sex, treatment outcomes using a weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7), and adverse effects of doxepin therapy. A reduction of ≥90% in UAS7 was defined as "complete response," 30-89% as "partial response" and <30% as "no significant response." Thirty-six patients were included in this study. Doxepin was effective in a majority (n = 27, 75%) of the patients with a short onset time. Sixteen patients (44.4%) showed a complete response. Mild sedative and anticholinergic side effects were well tolerated. Doxepin seems to be a reasonable, efficient, and affordable alternative for the treatment of chronic urticaria in patients who respond poorly to antihistamine therapy.

Risk factors for inadequate response to ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles: systematic review.

PURPOSE: Controlled ovarian stimulation is a fundamental part of a successful assisted reproduction treatment, and recognizing patients at risk of a poor response allows the development of targeted research to propose new treatment strategies for this specific group. The objective of this systematic review was to determine risk factors for poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles described in the literature. METHODS: The primary databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, LILACS, and SciELO were consulted, using specific terms with a restriction for articles in English or Portuguese published in the last 10 years. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that environmental endocrine disruptors, tobacco, genetic mutations, endometriomas, ovarian surgery, chemotherapy, and short menstrual cycles are factors that influence stimulation in assisted reproduction cycles. Further studies are necessary for characterizing patients with prior risk factors.

Performance of prognostic modelling of high and low ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for IVF.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the performance of previously established regression models in predicting low and high ovarian response to 150 µg corifollitropin alfa/GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation in an independent dataset? SUMMARY ANSWER: The outcome of ovarian stimulation with 150 µg corifollitropin alfa in a fixed, multiple dose GnRH-antagonist protocol can be validly predicted using logistic regression models with AMH being of paramount importance. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Predictors of ovarian response have been identified in FSH/GnRH agonist protocols as well as ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa/GnRH-antagonist. Multivariable response models have been established already, however, external validation of model performance has so far been lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data from a prospective, multi-centre (n = 5), multi-national, investigator-initiated, observational cohort study were analysed. Infertile women (n = 211), body weight >60 kg, were undergoing ovarian stimulation with 150 µg corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol for transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF. Demographic, sonographic and endocrine parameters were prospectively assessed on cycle Day 2 or 3 of spontaneous menstruation before ovarian stimulation. Main outcomes were low (<6 oocytes) and high (>18 oocytes) ovarian response. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Firstly, previously established prediction models for low ovarian response (LOR) and high ovarian response (HOR) were tested using the original parameters. Secondly, re-estimated parameters generated from the present data were tested on the established models. Thirdly, for the development of new predictive models of both LOR and HOR, several logistic regression models were estimated. Resulting prediction models were compared by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and bias-corrected Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) to identify the most reasonable model for each scenario. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The previously established prediction models for low and high response performed remarkably well on this dataset (low response AUC 0.8879 (95% CI: 0.8185-0.9573) and high response AUC 0.8909 (95% CI: 0.8251-0.9568)). A newly developed simplified model for LOR with log-transformed AMH values and only age as another covariate showed an AUC of 0.8920 (95% CI: 0.8237-0.9603) with the lowest AICc of all models compared. For predicting HOR, we suggest a simplified model using AMH, FSH and AFC (AUC of 0.8976, 95% CI: 0.8206-0.9746). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All analyses were done on data from women with a body weight >60 kg. The newly developed simplified models may suffer from overfitting and need to be tested in further independent data sets. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Patient selection for ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa should utilize established response prediction models. The clinical impact of this needs to be evaluated in future studies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by university funds. M.O.S., T.L. and I.R.K. have nothing to declare. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott, Marckryl Pharma, VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, ZIVA and BioSilu. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Poor ovarian response as a predictor for live birth in older women undergoing IVF.

Women of advanced age present a major challenge for fertility treatments. This study was designed to assess whether poor ovarian response (POR) according to the Bologna criteria is a significant predictor for live birth in women over 40. The outcomes of subsequent IVF cycles were also studied. The results of 1870 fresh IVF cycles in 1212 women were retrospectively analysed. The live birth per cycle was 3.3 times higher (11.61% versus 3.54%, P < 0.001) in good responders with more than three oocytes collected compared with women with less. Ovarian response defined by oocytes collected, but not by the number of follicles, was independently associated with live birth (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 3.54; P = 0.009). The occurrence of POR in subsequent IVF cycles was only 55%. No differences in live births were found in persistent POR compared with women with at least one good response. A single episode of POR in a first IVF cycle in older women has a limited predictive value for the outcomes of subsequent cycles. POR in women aged 40-43 years, defined by the number of oocytes retrieved, is a predictor for live birth in IVF.

Freeze-all embryo strategy in poor ovarian responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

This retrospective study determined the efficacy of the 'freeze-all' embryo strategy in poor ovarian responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 559 poor responders who met Bologna criteria between January 2012 and December 2014 were included in this study: 256 in the fresh embryo transfer group and 303 in the freeze-all group. Vitrification and warming of day 3 embryos were performed using the Cryotop method. The poor responders treated with fresh embryo transfer and those treated with freeze-all strategy showed similar live birth rates per cycle (12.1% vs. 16.2%, p = .172) and per transfer (15.9% vs. 20.9%, p = .182). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that maternal age at retrieval (odds ratio, 0.919; 95% confidence interval, 0.865-0.977; p = .006) and number of good-quality embryos transferred (odds ratio, 1.953; 95% confidence interval, 1.346-2.835; p < .001) were significantly associated with the live birth rate. Freeze-all cycle is an acceptable treatment in poor ovarian responders, and it should be suggested by physicians as an alternative to cycle cancelation in case in which a fresh transfer would not be advantageous.

Randomized, open trial comparing a modified double-lumen needle follicular flushing system with a single-lumen aspiration needle in IVF patients with poor ovarian response.

Study question: Is a modified double-lumen aspiration needle system with follicular flushing able to increase the mean oocyte yield by at least one in poor response IVF patients as compared to single-lumen needle aspiration without flushing? Summary answer: Follicular flushing with the modified flushing system did not increase the number of oocytes, but increased the procedure duration. What is known already: Most studies on follicular flushing were performed with conventional double-lumen needles in patients who were normal responders. Overall, these studies indicated no benefit of follicular flushing. Study design size, duration: Prospective, single-centre, randomized, controlled, open, superiority trial comparing the 17 G Steiner-Tan Needle® flushing system with a standard 17 G single-lumen aspiration needle (Gynetics®); time frame February 2015-March 2016. Participants/materials setting methods: Eighty IVF patients, 18-45 years, BMI >18 kg/m2 to <35 kg/m2, presenting with ≤ five follicles >10 mm in both ovaries at the end of the follicular phase were randomized to either aspirating and flushing each follicle 3× with the Steiner-Tan-Needle® automated flushing system (n = 40) or a conventional single-lumen needle aspiration (n = 40). Primary outcome was the number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs). Procedure duration, burden (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale; DASS-21) and post-procedure pain were also assessed. Main results and the role of chance: Flushing was not superior with a mean (SD) number of COCs of 2.4 (2.0) and 3.1 (2.3) in the Steiner-Tan Needle® and in the Gynectics® group, respectively (mean difference -0.7, 95% CI: 0.3 to -1.6; P = 0.27). Likewise no differences were observed in metaphase II  oocytes, two pronuclear oocytes, number of patients having an embryo transfer and DASS 21 scores. The procedure duration was significantly 2-fold increased. Limitations reasons for caution: Testing for differences in the number of patients achieving an embryo transfer or differences in pregnancy rate would require a much larger sample size. Wider implications of the findings: The use of follicular flushing is unlikely to benefit the prognosis of patients with poor ovarian response. Study funding/competing interest(s): The Steiner-Tan Needles® and the flushing system were provided for free by the manufacturer. K.v.H. has received personal fees from Finox and non-financial support from Merck-Serono; M.D. has received personal fees from Finox and non-financial support from Merck-Serono. A.S.-M. has received personal fees and non-financial support from M.D., Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from M.D., Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare LLC, ReprodWissen LLC and ZIVA LLC. Trial registration number: NCT 02365350 (clinicaltrials.gov). Trial registration date: Sixth of February 2015. Date of first patient's enrolment: Ninth of February 2015.

Ovarian response to 150 µg corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol: a prospective cohort study.

The incidence of low (<6 oocytes) and high (>18 oocytes) ovarian response to 150 µg corifollitropin alfa in relation to anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and other biomarkers was studied in a multi-centre (n = 5), multi-national, prospective, investigator-initiated, observational cohort study. Infertile women (n = 212), body weight >60 kg, underwent controlled ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-antagonist multiple-dose protocol. Demographic, sonographic and endocrine parameters were prospectively assessed on cycle day 2 or 3 of a spontaneous menstruation before the administration of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa. Serum AMH showed the best correlation with the number of oocytes obtained among all predictor variables. In receiver-operating characteristic analysis, AMH at a threshold of 0.91 ng/ml showed a sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 82.4%, positive predictive value 52.9%and negative predictive value 95.1% for predicting low response (area under the curve [AUC], 95% CI; P-value: 0.853, 0.769-0.936; <0.0001). For predicting high response, the optimal threshold for AMH was 2.58 ng/ml, relating to a sensitivity of 80.0%, specificity 82.1%, positive predictive value 42.5% and negative predictive value 96.1% (AUC, 95% CI; P-value: 0.871, 0.787-0.955; <0.0001). In conclusion, patients with serum AMH concentrations between approximately 0.9 and 2.6 ng/ml were unlikely to show extremes of response.

The cutoff values of serum AMH levels and starting recFSH doses for the individualization of IVF treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of our study is to categorize starting doses of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) based on various cutoff values of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and to determine the effectiveness of serum AMH levels in the prediction of poor ovarian response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective data analysis was conducted at IVF center. A total of 323 patients were included. All patients were divided into four groups according to the patients' serum AMH concentrations: Group 1 (AMH < 1 ng/ml; 450 IU/day n = 157); Group 2 (AMH 1-2 ng/ml; 375 IU/day, n = 55); Group 3 (AMH 2-3 ng/ml; 225 IU/day, n = 48); and Group 4 (AMH > 3 ng/ml; 150 IU/day, n = 63). Collected data included age, total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulations, the total number of oocytes retrieved, ovarian response, cancelation rate, and cPRs. RESULTS: As serum AMH levels increased, there were significant decreases in the starting recFSH dose and total gonadotropin dosage, and a significant increase in the total number of oocytes retrieved. There was a significant trend toward increasing cycle cancelation rates and decreasing cPRs with decreasing serum AMH levels. Although there were no significant differences with regard to the proportion of cycles with hypo-response between all groups. A result of ≤0.83 was considered the cutoff value of AMH to predict a hypo-response to ovarian stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: AMH is a useful marker in selecting the starting dose of recFSH and prediction of poor ovarian response. Our protocol may allow clinicians to modulate the starting dose of recFSH according to these cutoff values for serum AMH levels.