The Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates a Preference for High-Agency Environments.

The ability to exert flexible instrumental control over one's environment is a defining feature of adaptive decision-making. Here, we investigated neural substrates mediating a preference for environments with greater instrumental divergence, the distance between outcome probability distributions associated with alternative actions. A formal index of agency, instrumental divergence allows an organism to flexibly obtain the currently most desired outcome as preferences change. As such, it may have intrinsic utility, guiding decisions toward environments that maximize instrumental power. Consistent with this notion, we found that a measure of expected value that treats instrumental divergence as a reward surrogate provided a better account of male and female human participants' choice preferences than did a conventional model, sensitive only to monetary reward. Using model-based fMRI, we found that activity in the rostrolateral and ventromedial PFC, regions associated with abstract cognitive inferences and subjective value computations, respectively, scaled with the divergence-based account of expected value. Implications for a neural common currency of information theoretic and motivational variables are discussed.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Agency is a central concept in philosophy and psychology. While research thus far has focused on cognitive and perceptual measures of agency, recent work demonstrating a strong preference for high-agency environments indicates a salient motivational dimension. Here, using instrumental divergence, the distance between outcome distributions associated with alternative actions, as a formal index of agency, we found that brain regions associated with directed exploration and subjective value computations, respectively, were selectively modulated by a model that treated agency as a reward surrogate, over models that assigned utility only to monetary payoffs. In a subset of regions, such effects were predicted by the influence of instrumental divergence on economic choice preferences. Our results elucidate neural mechanisms mediating the utility of agency.

Neural correlates of improved inductive reasoning ability in abacus-trained children: A resting state fMRI study.

Abacus-based mental calculation (AMC) training may improve mathematics-related abilities and transfer to other cognitive domains. Thus, it was hypothesized that inductive reasoning abilities can be improved by AMC training given the overlapping cognitive processes and neural correlates between AMC and inductive reasoning. The aim of the current study was to examine the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of this possible adaption by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Sixty-three children were randomly assigned to either the AMC-trained or the nontrained group. The AMC-trained group was required to perform abacus training for 2 hours per week for 5 years whereas the nontrained group was not required to perform any abacus training. Each participant's rs-fMRI data were collected after abacus training, and regional homogeneity (ReHo) analysis was performed to determine the neural activity differences between groups. The participants' posttraining mathematical ability, intelligence quotients, and inductive reasoning ability were recorded and evaluated. The results revealed that AMC-trained children exhibited a significantly higher mathematical ability and inductive reasoning performance and higher ReHo in the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) compared to the nontrained group. In particular, the increased ReHo in the RLPFC was found to be positively correlated with improved inductive reasoning performance. Our findings suggest that rs-fMRI may reflect the modulation of training in task-related networks.

Transcranial direct current stimulation of the rLPFC shifts normative judgments in voluntary cooperation.

Normative judgment is a key capacity for human social norm compliance. Previous studies have revealed that the right lateral prefrontal cortex (rLPFC) is closely related to social norm compliance and that it has proven stimulation effects on behavior in voluntary and sanction-induced norm compliance, but not normative judgments. Nearly all these studies have been based on sanction-induced coordination cooperation, and a number of them have found that rLPFC has no effect on normative judgment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). However, no research study exists regarding the effects of the normative judgment in voluntary cooperation. In this study, we used a linear asymmetric public good game to investigate the role of normative judgment in voluntary cooperation with tDCS on rLPFC. Participants were engaged in anonymous social interactions and made decisions with real financial consequences after being randomly assigned to receive either anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation of 15 min. Results suggest that compared with the sham group, anodal/cathodal tDCS influenced the behavior and normative judgment of participants in opposite directions. These outcomes provide a neural evidence for the rLPFC mechanism on normative judgment in voluntary cooperation.

Corrigendum: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Right Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Changes a priori Normative Beliefs in Voluntary Cooperation.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00606.].

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Right Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Changes a priori Normative Beliefs in Voluntary Cooperation.

A priori normative beliefs, the precondition of social norm compliance that reflects culture and values, are considered unique to human social behavior. Previous studies related to the ultimatum game revealed that right lateral prefrontal cortex (rLPFC) has no stimulation effects on normative beliefs. However, no research has focused on the effects of a priori belief on the rLPFC in voluntary cooperation attached to the public good (PG) game. In this study, we used a linear asymmetric PG to confirm the influence of the rLPFC on a priori normative beliefs without threats of external punishment through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Participants engaged via computer terminals in groups of four (i.e., two high-endowment players with 35G$ and two low-endowment players with 23G$). They were anonymous and had no communication during the entire process. They were randomly assigned to receive 15 min of either anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation and then asked to answer questions concerning a priori normative beliefs (norm.belief and pg.belief). Results suggested that anodal/cathodal tDCS significantly (P < 0.001) shifted the participants' a priori normative beliefs in opposite directions compared to the shift in the sham group. In addition, different identities exhibited varying degrees of change (28.80-54.43%). These outcomes provide neural evidence of the rLPFC mechanism's effect on the normative beliefs in voluntary cooperation based on the PG framework.