Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
Idioma
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (4): 80-85, 2022.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35477205

RESUMEN

The development of minimally invasive surgical technologies in the treatment of chronic paraproctitis is a promising young trend in coloproctology. Increasingly, in clinical practice, coloproctologists use laser technologies in the outpatient treatment of extra- and transsphincteric pararectal fistulas, in particular, laser technology FiLaC (Fistula Laser Closure). OBJECTIVE: Conducting a comparative retrospective and prospective cohort study of immediate and long-term results of treatment of complicated transsphincteric and extrasphincteric fistulas using the developed modified FiLaC technology with the «traditional¼ FiLaC technology, and standard excision of the fistulous tract with plasty of the internal fistula opening with a full-thickness flap of the rectal wall. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 270 patients with trans- and extrasphincter pararectal fistulas, which were divided into three groups. In group 1 (n=90) the traditional FiLaC technology was used for the treatment of fistulas, in group 2 (n=90) the modified FiLaC technology was used, providing for the opening of purulent streaks and laser coagulation (FiLaC) of the intrasphincter part of the fistula with a Biolitec laser, 12 W, 100 J/cm, in group 3 (n=90), excision of the fistula tract with plastic surgery of the internal fistula opening with a full-thickness flap of the rectal wall was used. RESULTS: The results of treatment in patients of the three groups were monitored for 19-36 months. after surgery (median 31 months). The analysis of the results showed that in group 2 (modified FiLaC technology) healing of fistulas occurred faster (7.3±0.5 weeks versus 12.6±0.7 weeks) compared to group 3 (excision of the fistula with plasty of the internal fistula opening). The indicators of sphincterometry in the long-term period in patients of the 2nd group were restored in relation to the initial ones, and in the th group 3 they were reduced compared to the initial values. Postoperative complications were most common in patients of group 3 (32.2%), and least often in patients of group 2 - 8.9%. At the same time, late postoperative complications were most common (24.4%) in patients of group 1. None of the patients in group 2 had late postoperative complications, while 11.1% of postoperative complications were recorded in group 3. In patients who underwent excision of the AC (group 3), relapses were most common: early - 15.6%, late - in 21.1%. The least frequent relapses were observed in patients who underwent modified FiLaC technology (Group 2): 6.7% - early relapses and 11.1% - late relapses. CONCLUSION: The use of the modified FiLaC technology in the treatment of trans- and extrasphincteric fistulas of the rectum made it possible to minimize postoperative complications, fully preserve the function of anal holding, and achieve healing of fistulas in 82.5% of cases with a median follow-up of 31 months.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Rectal , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Fístula Rectal/diagnóstico , Fístula Rectal/etiología , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tecnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA