Defining remission in childhood-onset lupus: PReS-endorsed consensus definitions by an international task force.

OBJECTIVE: To derive childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) specific remission definitions for future treat-to-target (T2T) trials, observational studies, and clinical practice. METHODS: The cSLE International T2T Task Force conducted Delphi surveys exploring paediatric perspectives on adult-onset SLE remission targets. A modified nominal group technique was used to discuss, refine, and agree on the cSLE remission target criteria. RESULTS: The Task Force proposed two definitions of remission: 'cSLE clinical remission on steroids (cCR)' and 'cSLE clinical remission off steroids (cCR-0)'. The common criteria are: (1) Clinical-SLEDAI-2 K = 0; (2) PGA score < 0.5 (0-3 scale); (4) stable antimalarials, immunosuppressive, and biologic therapy (changes due to side-effects, adherence, weight, or when building up to target dose allowed). Criterion (3) in cCR is the prednisolone dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day (maximum 5 mg/day), whereas in cCR-0 it is zero. CONCLUSIONS: cSLE definitions of remission have been proposed, maintaining sufficient alignment with the adult-SLE definition to facilitate life-course research.

First validation of the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in a real-life longitudinal cSLE cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in cSLE by describing differences in time to reach first adult LLDAS (aLLDAS) versus cLLDAS. Secondly, to analyse positive and negative predictors for maintaining cLLDAS for at least 50% of follow-up time (cLLDAS-50) and for the occurrence of damage. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal data from a cSLE cohort were analysed. Used definitions were: aLLDAS according to Franklyn, cLLDAS by cSLE treat-to-target (T2T) Task Force, disease activity score by SLEDAI -2 K and damage by SLICC damage index. RESULTS: Fifty cSLE patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Each patient reached aLLDAS and cLLDAS at least once. Mean time to reach first aLLDAS/cLLDAS was 8.2/9.0 months, respectively. For 22/42 patients the mean steroid-dose related delay to reach first cLLDAS was 6.2 months. 58% of patients were able to maintain cLLDAS-50. Time to first cLLDAS (OR 0.8, p = 0.013) and higher number of flares (OR 0.374, p = 0.03) were negative predictors to maintain cLLDAS-50. Damage occurred in 34% of patients (23.5% steroid-related), in 64.7% within one year after diagnosis. African/Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, neuropsychiatric involvement and ever use of a biologic were significant predictors for damage. CONCLUSION: Time to reach cLLDAS in cSLE differs from time to (a)LLDAS, which validates the new cLLDAS definition. Attaining cLLDAS-50 was difficult in real-life. This cohort shows the high risk for early damage in cSLE. T2T with earlier focus on steroid-tapering and starting steroid-sparing drugs seems important to prevent (steroid-related) damage in cSLE.

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Role of Biomarkers for the Management of Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biomarkers are used frequently for noninvasive monitoring and treatment decision making in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of biomarkers for the management of UC. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, and conduct an evidence synthesis on the clinical performance of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin as biomarkers of disease activity in patients with established UC in symptomatic remission or with active symptoms. The guideline panel used the Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for the use of biomarkers for monitoring and management of UC and provided implementation considerations for clinical practice. RESULTS: The guideline panel made 7 conditional recommendations. In patients with UC in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests the use of a biomarker- and symptom-based monitoring strategy over a symptom-based monitoring strategy. For patients in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests using fecal calprotectin <150 µg/g, normal fecal lactoferrin, and/or normal CRP to rule out active inflammation and avoid routine endoscopic assessment of disease. In patients with UC with moderate to severe symptoms, the panel suggests using fecal calprotectin >150 µg/g, elevated fecal lactoferrin, or elevated CRP to inform treatment decisions and avoid routine endoscopic assessment of disease. However, in patients in symptomatic remission but elevated biomarkers, and in patients with moderate to severe symptoms with normal biomarkers, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment of disease to inform treatment decisions. In patients with UC with mild symptoms, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment of disease activity to inform treatment decisions. The panel identified the use of a biomarker-based monitoring strategy over an endoscopy-based monitoring strategy as a knowledge gap. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal use of biomarkers, and identified areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with UC, noninvasive biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin, fecal lactoferrin, and serum CRP can inform disease monitoring and management.

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Role of Biomarkers for the Management of Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biomarkers are used frequently for evaluation and monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of biomarkers for the management of CD. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to formulate patient-centered clinical questions and review evidence on the performance of fecal calprotectin, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and Endoscopic Healing Index in patients with established CD who were asymptomatic, had symptoms of varying severity, or were in surgically induced remission. Biomarker performance was assessed against the gold standard of endoscopic activity, defined as a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease ≥3. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for use of biomarkers in various settings. Implementation considerations were formulated for each recommendation to inform clinical practice. RESULTS: The guideline panel made 11 conditional recommendations. In patients with CD in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests use of a biomarker- and symptom-based monitoring strategy over symptoms alone. In patients in symptomatic remission, a fecal calprotectin <150 µg/g and normal CRP rules out active inflammation, avoiding endoscopic evaluation for assessment of disease activity. However, elevated biomarkers in this setting merit confirmation with endoscopy before treatment adjustment. In patients with CD with mild symptoms, neither normal nor elevated biomarkers alone are sufficiently accurate to determine endoscopic activity. In patients with CD with moderate to severe symptoms, elevated fecal calprotectin or serum CRP suggests endoscopic activity, precluding routine endoscopic assessment for disease activity. In patients with CD in surgically induced remission in low-risk patients on pharmacologic prophylaxis, a normal fecal calprotectin reliably rules out endoscopic recurrence. In other postoperative settings, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment for establishing postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CD, fecal calprotectin and serum CRP can inform disease management in both asymptomatic and symptomatic disease. Discordance between symptom assessment and biomarker value may merit endoscopic evaluation for confirmation of status of disease activity.

The SLE-DAS provides an accurate and feasible flare tool in the clinical setting: a validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the criterion validity of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) flare tool and compare its performance in identifying flares against other instruments. METHODS: Patients with SLE fulfilling SLE-DAS low disease activity at baseline were included from two academic lupus clinics. During follow-up, flares were identified by the senior attending clinician, applying the expert-consensus-based definition as gold-standard. The first clinical flare from flaring patients, and the first visit after baseline in patients without flares were analysed. In each no flare/flare visits, we assessed flares by SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72), classic-SELENA Flare Index (c-SELENA FI), revised-SELENA FI (r-SELENA FI), and SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4). We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa agreement of each flare tool against the gold-standard. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were included and followed-up for 22.9 (14.2) months. Incidence of flares was 8.19/100 patient-years, with 69 patients experiencing flares. The SLE-DAS identified 96.6% of the expert-defined flares implying a treatment change and classified 28.0% of those as moderate/severe. Sensitivity and specificity for the gold-standard flare definition were: SLE-DAS 97.1% and 97.3%, c-SELENA FI 88.4% and 98.1%, r-SELENA FI 88.4% and 96.8%, SLEDAI-2K 56.5% and 99.2%, respectively. Kappa coefficients of these instruments were 0.902 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.957), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.935), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.761, 0.903), and 0.663 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.769), respectively. The number of flare misclassifications was lowest with the SLE-DAS, and highest with the SLEDAI-2K. CONCLUSION: The SLE-DAS accurately identifies and categorizes flares as mild or moderate/severe. It is feasible and, thus, may help the physicians' treatment decisions in the clinical practice setting.

A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA).

OBJECTIVES: Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases ('oligoarthritis', 'enthesitis', 'polyarthritis', 'neoplastic history', 'cardiovascular risk') requiring treatment OPTImization, and two 'control' cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment-according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA. RESULTS: One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI'PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were 'oligoarthritis' and 'enthesitis' with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty ('polyarthritis in relapse', 'neoplastic history' and 'cardiovascular risk') generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment. CONCLUSION: The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Long-term clinical outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis that was treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED studies.

OBJECTIVES: To assess disease outcomes after 20 and 12 years of patients with rheumatoid (RA) or undifferentiated arthritis (UA), treated-to-target in the BeSt and IMPROVED trials. METHODS: In BeSt (inclusion 2000-2002, duration 10 years), 508 patients with early RA were randomized to: 1. sequential monotherapy, 2. step-up combination therapy, 3. initial csDMARD combination therapy, 4. initial bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy. The treatment target was low disease activity (DAS ≤ 2.4).In IMPROVED (inclusion 2007-2010, duration 5 years), 610 patients with early RA/UA started MTX with prednisone bridging. The treatment target was remission (DAS < 1.6). Patients not in early remission were randomized to 1. csDMARD combination therapy or 2. bDMARD/csDMARD combination therapy.Between 2019-2022, these patients were invited for long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One-hundred-fifty-three ex-Best and 282 ex-IMPROVED patients participated in the follow-up study after median 12 and 20 years since study start.In ex-BeSt and ex-IMPROVED patients the rate of low disease activity was 91%, and 68% were in DAS remission. Median SHS was 14.0 in ex-BeSt (IQR 6.0-32.5; progression since end BeSt 6.0, IQR 2.0-12.5) and 8 in ex-IMPROVED participants (IQR 3-16; progression since end IMPROVED 4, IQR 2-9). Mean HAQ was 0.8 ± 0.6 in ex-BeSt (change since end BeSt: 0.3 ± 0.5) and 0.6 ± 0.6 in ex-IMPROVED participants (change since end IMPROVED: 0.06 ± 0.5). CONCLUSION: At 12/20 years after treatment start, the majority of RA and UA patients who had been treated to target low DAS or DAS remission were in DAS remission and had limited functional disability. Radiographic damage progression was mild although not completely suppressed.

Contributors to Organ Damage in Childhood Lupus: Corticosteroid Use and Disease Activity.

BACKGROUND: Awareness of paediatric-specific predictors of damage in Childhood-lupus is needed to inform mitigation measures. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain how clinical and demographic variables correlate with damage accrual and identify predictors of damage. METHODS: Analysis included UK JSLE Cohort Study participants. Univariable and multivariable Prentice-Williams-Peterson models investigated how demographic and clinical factors influenced hazards of new damage. Analyses were performed across the entire cohort, in patients with minimal disease activity marked by a time-adjusted average SLEDAI-2K score (AMS)≤2, low activity (AMS ≤ 4), moderate-high activity (AMS > 4) and those with no corticosteroids. RESULTS: Within the entire cohort (n = 430), factors associated with damage included: any methylprednisolone (Hazard Ratio, HR 2.20, [CI 1.33-3.62]), time-adjusted mean Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) (HR 2.87, [CI 1.48-5.56]) and AMS score (HR 1.13, [CI 1.03-1.24], all p< 0.05). Within the low activity subgroup, any methylprednisolone (HR 2.61, [CI 1.04-6.53]) and time-adjusted mean PGA (HR 3.41, [CI 1.52-7.76]) were associated with damage (both p< 0.05). Within the moderate-high activity subgroup, any methylprednisolone (HR 2.29, [CI 1.31-4.00]), time-adjusted mean PGA (HR 2.66, [CI 1.20-5.87]) and AMS score (HR 1.15, [CI 1.03-1.29]), were predictive of damage (all p< 0.05). Baseline organ damage was predictive of subsequent damage accrual in the minimal activity (HR 1.33, CI [1.78-8.08]) and no corticosteroids subgroups (HR 3.64, CI [1.83-7.24], both p< 0.005). CONCLUSION: Disease activity levels (AMS/PGA) and proxy indicators (methylprednisolone exposure, baseline damage) were found to be key predictors of damage accrual. This highlights the importance of practical strategies, to reduce disease activity and long-term treatment toxicity, such as treat-to-target.

Refining Treat-to-Target (T2T) strategies in Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes (CAPS): The role of inflammatory markers.

OBJECTIVES: Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndromes (CAPS) encompasses a spectrum of Interleukin-1 (IL-1) driven systemic diseases with dramatic individual and societal burden. The study aimed to identify parameters and instruments to refine real-life Treat-to-Target (T2T) strategies and control CAPS disease activity. METHODS: A single-centre, longitudinal study of consecutive children and adults diagnosed with CAPS and treated with anti-IL-1 therapy was performed. Demographics, clinical phenotype and NLRP3 gene variants in addition to serial inflammatory markers and Physician and Patient/Parent Global Assessments (PGA/PPGA) were captured. Effectiveness of anti-IL-1 T2T strategies and factors associated with therapy escalation were determined. RESULTS: A total of 54 CAPS patients with 759 follow-up visits were included; 31/54 (57%) were children; the median follow-up was 108 months (12-620). The moderate CAPS phenotype was present in 89%; overall 59% had pathogenic/likely pathogenic NLRP3 variants. Therapy adjustments were documented in 50/759 visits including 35 therapy escalations and 15 reductions; 74% of the therapy escalation visits were for children. At time of visit, 63% showed moderate, 37% severe clinical disease activity. Inflammatory markers remained largely normal. Significant improvement was observed in both PGA/PPGA throughout the study (p< 0.01). At the last follow-up, 96% of patients achieved remission. CONCLUSION: Guidance for refining real-life T2T strategies in CAPS cohorts can be drawn from serial assessments of PGA and PPGA reliably reflecting changes in disease activity. Individual parameters including age and NLRP3 gene variants are important predictors, while the sensitivity of inflammatory markers is limited due to the confounding anti-IL-1 therapy.

Evidence on treat to target strategies in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To inform an international task force about current evidence on Treat to Target (T2T) strategies in PMR and GCA. METHODS: A systematic literature research (SLR) was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov from their inception date to May 2022, and in the EULAR/ACR abstract database (2019-2021). Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomised interventional studies published in English and answering at least one of the eleven PICO questions on T2T strategies, treatment targets and outcomes, framed by the taskforce, were identified. Study selection process, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two investigators. RESULTS: Of 7809 screened abstracts, 397 were selected for detailed review and 76 manuscripts were finally included (31 RCTs, eight subgroup/exploratory analyses of RCTs and 37 non-randomised interventional studies). No study comparing a T2T strategy against standard of care was identified. In PMR RCTs, the most frequently applied outcomes concerned treatment (90.9% of RCTs), particularly the cumulative glucocorticoids (GC) dose and GC tapering, followed by clinical, laboratory and safety outcomes (63.3% each). Conversely, the most commonly reported outcomes in RCTs in GCA were prevention of relapses (72.2%), remission as well as treatment-related and safety outcomes (67.0% each). CONCLUSIONS: This SLR provides evidence and highlights the knowledge gaps on T2T strategies in PMR and GCA, informing the task force developing T2T recommendations for these diseases.

Non-adherence to urate lowering therapy in gout after 5 years is related to poor outcomes-results from the NOR-Gout study.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with gout need to adhere to medication over time to achieve good outcomes. We assessed self-reported adherence to medication with urate lowering therapy (ULT) 5 years after a treat-to-target intervention and studied how non-adherence was related to baseline demographic and disease variables. METHODS: Patients in the NOR-Gout observational study were included after a recent gout flare and serum urate >360 µmol/L. Patients (mean age 56.2 (S.D. 13.6), 94.5% males, 17.2% with tophi) attended tight-control visits over one year with escalating urate lowering therapy using a treat-to-target strategy. Five-year follow-up included the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) questionnaire (range 5-25) for adherence. Flares and SUA target achievement were compared for 5-year adherence to medication. RESULTS: At 5-years most of the 163 patients used ULT (95.1%). MARS-5 adherence scores after 5 years were high (median 24, interquartile range 22-25). Patients in the lowest MARS-5 quartile had, compared to the highest quartile, more often a flare during the last year of follow-up (33.3% vs. 9.5%, P=0.004), and reached the 5-yr serum urate treatment target less frequently (45.2% vs. 87.5%, P<0.001). Baseline lower age (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.39-0.79), non-European origin (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.06-0.80), lower SF-36 mental health scores (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.91-0.98) and less joint pain during last flare (OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.58-0.92) were independent risk factors for non-adherence to medication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported after 5 years high adherence to medication. Non-adherence was related to more flares and less urate target achievement. Younger age and non-European origin were associated with non-adherence.

Treating to target in multiple sclerosis: Do we know how to measure whether we hit it?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The rapidly evolving landscape of effective treatment options in multiple sclerosis has led to a shift of treatment objectives towards a treat-to-target approach aiming to suppress disease activity below the level of detectability early during the disease. To enable treat-to-target, a thorough reappraisal of available outcome measures with respect to their ability in this regard is required. METHODS: To that end, we conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review of more than 1000 studies using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 methodology focusing on underlying evidence as well as utility and implementability in clinical practice. RESULTS: From there, we propose a set of measurable outcomes for everyday routine clinical practice as well as advanced/aspirational measurables requiring additional resources. We also outline remaining knowledge/technology gaps that need to be overcome to enable a treat-to-target approach. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides the basis for an evidence-based definition of outcome targets for relevant stakeholders and regulatory authorities.

Achieving osteoporosis treat-to-target goals with teriparatide or alendronate: sub-analysis of Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05).

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) ≥ -2.5 SD could be used as the treat-to-target (T2T) goal when treating osteoporosis with teriparatide (TPTD) and alendronate (ALN), and to investigate the relationship with incident vertebral fracture by re-analyzing data from a randomized, controlled trial (JOINT-05) involving postmenopausal Japanese women at high fracture risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants received sequential therapy with once-weekly TPTD for 72 weeks, followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group) or ALN monotherapy for 120 weeks (ALN group). BMDs were measured at the lumbar spine (L2-4), total hip, and femoral neck at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 120 weeks by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The T2T goal was BMD ≥ -2.5 SD, and the endpoint was the proportion of participants with baseline BMD < -2.5 SD in three measurement sites achieving BMD ≥ -2.5 SD. RESULTS: A total of 559 participants were selected. BMD ≥ -2.5 SD at 120 weeks in the L2-4, total hip, and femoral neck sites was achieved in 20.5%, 23.1%, and 5.9%, respectively, in the TPTD-ALN group and 22.2%, 11.7%, and 7.3%, respectively, in the ALN group. Incident vertebral fractures occurred in areas of both lower and high BMD. CONCLUSION: During the 1.5-year treatment period, more than 20% of participants achieved BMD ≥ -2.5 SD as a T2T goal at L2-4. Since the achievement level differed depending on the BMD measurement site, the appropriate site should be selected according to the baseline BMD level.

IBD-PODCAST Spain: A Close Look at Current Daily Clinical Practice in IBD Management.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) that contributes in part to irreversible bowel damage and long-term complications, reduced quality of life, invalidity, and economic burden. Suboptimal control of IBD is associated with higher healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), impaired quality of life (QoL), and reduced work productivity. AIMS: The IBD-PODCAST study aimed to assess the proportion of IBD patients with suboptimal control and its associated impact. METHODS: IBD-PODCAST is a cross-sectional, multicenter study that aimed to characterize the CD and UC population with optimal or suboptimal control according to the STRIDE-II criteria and patient- and physician-reported measures. Here we present the results of the Spanish cohort (n = 396). RESULTS: A total of 104/196 (53.1%) CD and 83/200 (41.5%) UC patients were found to have suboptimal disease control. Long-term treatment targets according to STRIDE-II were applied in 172 (87.8%) CD and 181 (90.5%) UC patients. 125 of 172 (72.7%) CD and 74 of 181 (40.9%) UC patients were currently treated with targeted immunomodulators. Patients with CD and UC and suboptimal disease control showed impaired QoL, higher HCRU and direct costs, and also loss of work productivity compared to those with optimal control. CONCLUSION: Despite a high rate of targeted immunomodulator therapy, a substantial proportion of IBD patients show suboptimal disease control according to the STRIDE II criteria. Those patients with suboptimal disease control exhibit impaired QoL, less work productivity, and higher HCRU, suggesting that there is considerable need for better treatment approaches in IBD.

Anti-VEGF therapy for the long-term management of diabetic macular edema: a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology.

In an aging population, the prevalence and burden of diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and vision-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME) are only expected to rise around the world. Similarly to other complications of diabetes mellitus, DME requires long-term management. This article aims to review the current challenges associated with the long-term management of DME, opportunities to improve outcomes for patients, and to develop a treat-to-target strategy based on macular morphology. At present, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for the management of DME; however, best-achievable vision outcomes with treatment are reliant on frequent injections and close monitoring, which are difficult to maintain in current clinical practice because of the burden this imposes on patients. Achieving and maintaining good vision with treatment are the most important factors for patients with DME. Landmark trials have shown that vision gains with anti-VEGF therapy are typically accompanied by anatomical improvements (e.g., reductions in retinal thickness); therefore, multimodal imaging measures of macular morphology are often used in patients with DME to guide real-world treatment decisions. We would like to propose a hypothetical treat-to-target algorithm to guide physicians on treatment strategies for the long-term management of DME. Alternative measures of retinal fluid (e.g., persistence, stability, location) may be stronger predictors of visual acuity in DME, although further research is required to confirm whether alternate quantifiable biomarkers such as subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid volumes can be used as a biomarker of clinical improvement. Identifying novel biomarkers and treatments that target neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, improving patient-physician communication around treatment adherence, and using treat-to-target measures may help to ensure that the long-term benefits of treatment are realized.

Evaluation of a hybrid telehealth care pathway for patients with axial spondyloarthritis including self-sampling at home: results of a longitudinal proof-of-concept mixed-methods study (TeleSpactive).

Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) require close monitoring to achieve the goal of sustained disease remission. Telehealth can facilitate continuous care while relieving scarce healthcare resources. In a mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, we investigated a hybrid telehealth care axSpA pathway in patients with stable disease over 6 months. Patients used a medical app to document disease activity (BASDAI and PtGA bi-weekly, flare questionnaire weekly). To enable a remote ASDAS-CRP (TELE-ASDAS-CRP), patients used a capillary self-sampling device at home. Monitoring results were discussed and a decision was reached via shared decision-making whether a pre-planned 3-month on-site appointment (T3) was necessary. Ten patients completed the study, and eight patients also completed additional telephone interviews. Questionnaire adherence was high; BASDAI (82.3%), flares (74.8%) and all patients successfully completed the TELE-ASDAS-CRP for the T3 evaluation. At T3, 9/10 patients were in remission or low disease activity and all patients declined the offer of an optional T3 on-site appointment. Patient acceptance of all study components was high with a net promoter score (NPS) of +50% (mean NPS 8.8 ± 1.5) for self-sampling, +70% (mean NPS 9.0 ± 1.6) for the electronic questionnaires and +90% for the T3 teleconsultation (mean NPS 9.7 ± 0.6). In interviews, patients reported benefits such as a better overview of their condition, ease of use of telehealth tools, greater autonomy, and, most importantly, travel time savings. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate a hybrid approach to follow-up axSpA patients including self-sampling. The positive results observed in this scalable proof-of-concept study warrant a larger confirmatory study.

Impact of completely histological remission on reducing flare-ups in moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced ulcerative colitis patients with endoscopic remission.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Endoscopic remission is presently recognized as the standard therapeutic target in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, achieving histological remission is increasingly viewed as a pivotal objective. This study investigates the effects of attaining completely histological remission on the clinical outcomes for UC patients with a high disease burden who have already reached endoscopic remission. This is the inaugural study to concentrate on this specific patient demographic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced UC patients with completely endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0) between June 2017 and October 2023 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Patients were classified into histological remission (HR) and non-histological remission (non-HR) groups based on the Nancy index (NI). HR was defined as an NI score of 0, with all other patients categorized as non-HR. The definition of flare-ups was based on both clinical and endoscopic evidence. Comparative analyses focused on baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (HR group: 23, non-HR group: 19) were included. The average follow-up duration was 17.6 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. At the end of follow-up, the HR group showed a significantly lower rate of acute flare-ups (26.1% vs. 68.4%, P = 0.006). Although not statistically significant, the HR group also experienced fewer emergency department visits and hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: For moderate-to-severe, biologics-experienced UC patients in endoscopic remission, achieving completely histological remission is associated with a substantial reduction in flare-ups, suggesting its potential as a valuable therapeutic target.

Personalised therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. / Terapia personalizada en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

Establishing clinical remission criteria for giant cell arteritis: Results of a Delphi exercise carried out by an expert panel of the Japan Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a proposal for giant cell arteritis remission criteria in order to implement a treat-to-target algorithm. METHODS: A task force consisting of 10 rheumatologists, 3 cardiologists, 1 nephrologist, and 1 cardiac surgeon was established in the Large-vessel Vasculitis Group of the Japanese Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis to conduct a Delphi survey of remission criteria for giant cell arteritis. The survey was circulated among the members over four reiterations with four face-to-face meetings. Items with a mean score of ≥4 were extracted as items for defining remission criteria. RESULTS: An initial literature review yielded a total of 117 candidate items for disease activity domains and treatment/comorbidity domains of remission criteria, of which 35 were extracted as disease activity domains (systematic symptoms, signs and symptoms of cranial and large-vessel area, inflammatory markers, and imaging findings). For the treatment/comorbidity domain, ≤5 mg/day of prednisolone 1 year after starting glucocorticoids was extracted. The definition of achievement of remission was the disappearance of active disease in the disease activity domain, normalization of inflammatory markers, and ≤5 mg/day of prednisolone. CONCLUSION: We developed proposals for remission criteria to guide the implementation of a treat-to-target algorithm for giant cell arteritis.

Association between P1NP value and increases in bone mineral density in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with romosozumab.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of treatment with romosozumab for 1 year and association between bone turnover markers and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Participants were 53 treatment-naïve postmenopausal osteoporosis patients. Correlations of per cent changes (Δ) in lumbar (L) and total hip (TH) BMD 12 months after initiating romosozumab with baseline demographic factors and parameters of N-terminal propeptide of Type 1 collagen (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b at baseline and Months 1, 3, and 6 were assessed. Multiple regression analysis was performed on factors significantly correlated with ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12. RESULTS: ΔL-BMD and ΔTH-BMD at Month 12 were 17.5% and 8.1%, respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12. High total amount of P1NP values from baseline to Month 6 was associated with large increases in L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 and was most strongly correlated with the P1NP value at Month 3. CONCLUSIONS: A high P1NP value at Month 3 predicted large increases in both L-BMD and TH-BMD at Month 12 in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients treated with romosozumab.