Arterial and Mixed Venous Kinetics of Desflurane and Sevoflurane, Administered Simultaneously, at Three Different Global Ventilation to Perfusion Ratios in Piglets with Normal Lungs.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have established the role of various tissue compartments in the kinetics of inhaled anesthetic uptake and elimination. The role of normal lungs in inhaled anesthetic kinetics is less understood. In juvenile pigs with normal lungs, the authors measured desflurane and sevoflurane washin and washout kinetics at three different ratios of alveolar minute ventilation to cardiac output value. The main hypothesis was that the ventilation/perfusion ratio (VA/Q) of normal lungs influences the kinetics of inhaled anesthetics. METHODS: Seven healthy pigs were anesthetized with intravenous anesthetics and mechanically ventilated. Each animal was studied under three different VA/Q conditions: normal, low, and high. For each VA/Q condition, desflurane and sevoflurane were administered at a constant, subanesthetic inspired partial pressure (0.15 volume% for sevoflurane and 0.5 volume% for desflurane) for 45 min. Pulmonary arterial and systemic arterial blood samples were collected at eight time points during uptake, and then at these same times during elimination, for measurement of desflurane and sevoflurane partial pressures. The authors also assessed the effect of VA/Q on paired differences in arterial and mixed venous partial pressures. RESULTS: For desflurane washin, the scaled arterial partial pressure differences between 5 and 0 min were 0.70 ± 0.10, 0.93 ± 0.08, and 0.82 ± 0.07 for the low, normal, and high VA/Q conditions (means, 95% CI). Equivalent measurements for sevoflurane were 0.55 ± 0.06, 0.77 ± 0.04, and 0.75 ± 0.08. For desflurane washout, the scaled arterial partial pressure differences between 0 and 5 min were 0.76 ± 0.04, 0.88 ± 0.02, and 0.92 ± 0.01 for the low, normal, and high VA/Q conditions. Equivalent measurements for sevoflurane were 0.79 ± 0.05, 0.85 ± 0.03, and 0.90 ± 0.03. CONCLUSIONS: Kinetics of inhaled anesthetic washin and washout are substantially altered by changes in the global VA/Q ratio for normal lungs.

Intravenous versus Volatile Anesthetic Effects on Postoperative Cognition in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Delayed neurocognitive recovery after surgery is associated with poor outcome. Most surgeries require general anesthesia, of which sevoflurane and propofol are the most commonly used inhalational and intravenous anesthetics. The authors tested the primary hypothesis that patients with laparoscopic abdominal surgery under propofol-based anesthesia have a lower incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery than patients under sevoflurane-based anesthesia. A second hypothesis is that there were blood biomarkers for predicting delayed neurocognitive recovery to occur. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled study was performed at four hospitals in China. Elderly patients (60 yr and older) undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery that was likely longer than 2 h were randomized to a propofol- or sevoflurane-based regimen to maintain general anesthesia. A minimum of 221 patients was planned for each group to detect a one-third decrease in delayed neurocognitive recovery incidence in propofol group compared with sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was delayed neurocognitive recovery incidence 5 to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 544 patients were enrolled, with 272 patients in each group. Of these patients, 226 in the propofol group and 221 in the sevoflurane group completed the needed neuropsychological tests for diagnosing delayed neurocognitive recovery, and 46 (20.8%) in the sevoflurane group and 38 (16.8%) in the propofol group met the criteria for delayed neurocognitive recovery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.24; P = 0.279). A high blood interleukin-6 concentration at 1 h after skin incision was associated with an increased likelihood of delayed neurocognitive recovery (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.07; P = 0.007). Adverse event incidences were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthetic choice between propofol and sevoflurane did not appear to affect the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery 5 to 7 days after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. A high blood interleukin-6 concentration after surgical incision may be an independent risk factor for delayed neurocognitive recovery.

Anesthetic Potency of Intravenous Infusion of 20% Emulsified Sevoflurane and Effect on the Blood-Gas Partition Coefficient in Dogs.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) infusions of volatile anesthetics in lipid emulsion may increase blood lipid concentration, potentially altering the anesthetic agent's blood solubility and blood-gas partition coefficient (BGPC). We examined the influence of a low-lipid concentration 20% sevoflurane emulsion on BGPC, and the anesthetic potency of this emulsion using dogs. METHODS: We compared BGPC and anesthetic characteristics in 6 dogs between the IV anesthesia of emulsion and the sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia in a randomized crossover substudy. Minimum alveolar concentrations (MACs) were determined by tail-clamp stimulation by using the up-and-down method. Blood sevoflurane concentration and partial pressure were measured by gas chromatography; end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was measured using a gas monitor. The primary outcome was BGPC at the end of IV anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia. Secondary outcomes were time to loss/recovery of palpebral reflex, finish intubation and awakening, MAC, blood concentration/partial pressure at MAC and awakening, correlation between blood partial pressure and gas monitor, and the safety of emulsions. RESULTS: BGPC showed no difference between IV and inhaled anesthesia (0.859 [0.850-0.887] vs 0.813 [0.791-0.901]; P = .313). Induction and emergence from anesthesia were more rapid in IV anesthesia of emulsion than inhalation anesthesia. MAC of emulsion (1.33% [1.11-1.45]) was lower than that of inhalation (2.40% [2.33-2.48]; P = .031), although there was no significant difference in blood concentration. End-tidal sevoflurane concentration could be estimated using gas monitor during IV anesthesia of emulsion. No major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: IV anesthesia with emulsion did not increase the BGCP significantly compared to inhalation anesthesia. It was suggested that the anesthetic potency of this emulsion may be equal to or more than that of inhalation.

Effects of different plasma target concentrations of remifentanil on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in children with laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of different plasma target concentrations of remifentanil on the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for blocking adrenergic response (BAR) of sevoflurane in children with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children with 3-7 years old scheduled for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into group R0, group R1, and group R2 according to different remifentanil plasma target concentration (0, 1, and 2 ngml-1), respectively. The MACBAR of sevoflurane was determined by the up-and-down and sequential method in each group. The concentrations of epinephrine and noradrenaline were also determined at corresponding time points. RESULTS: A total of 52 child patients were used among the anticipated 75 patients. In groups R0, R1, and R2, the MACBAR of sevoflurane was (3.29 ± 0.17) %, (2.12 ± 0.10) % and (1.29 ± 0.11) %, respectively, and a significant difference was found among the three groups (P<0.05). The changes of epinephrine and noradrenaline concentrations in each group before and after insufflation of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil by target-controlled infusion can effectively reduce the MACBAR of sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in children. At a similar effect of MACBAR, both the changes of epinephrine and noradrenaline concentrations are not affected by the infusion of different remifentanil target concentrations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn ( ChiCTR1800019393 , 8, Nov, 2018).

Effects of different remifentanil target concentrations on MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients with liver dysfunction under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum stimulus: A randomized controlled trial.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Remifentanil can effectively decrease the sevoflurane concentration to block sympathetic adrenergic response to CO2 pneumoperitoneum stimulus,and liver dysfunction will significantly reduce the MACBAR (minimum alveolar concentration for blocking adrenergic response) of sevoflurane. However, the effects of different remifentanil concentrations on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients with liver dysfunction are unclear. The aim of this study was to observe the effects of different remifentanil concentrations by intravenous target-controlled infusion on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients with grade B liver dysfunction under carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum stimulus. METHODS: Seventy-five patients with grade B liver dysfunction undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were selected, and randomly divided into three groups with remifentanil plasma target concentrations of 0 (group R0 ), 1 (group R1 ) and 2 (group R2 ) ng/ml. Anaesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of propofol 2-3 mg/kg, remifentanil 2 µg/kg and cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg. All groups were inhaled different concentrations of sevoflurane. The determination of sevoflurane MACBAR in each group was used a method of sequential-allocation technique, and venous blood samples were taken before and after the creation of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum to determine plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: The MACBAR of sevoflurane in groups R0 , R1 and R2 was 4.83%, 3.00% and 2.10%, respectively. The MACBAR of sevoflurane was significantly difference among the three groups. When a similar effect of MACBAR had achieved in each group, no significant differences were found in the changes of plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations before and after the creation of pneumoperitoneum. What is new and conclusion Target-controlled infusion of different concentrations of remifentanil can reduce sevoflurane MACBAR during pneumoperitoneum stimulation in patients with liver dysfunction in some degree. However, the changes of plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations are consistent in the three groups when patient's stress response was inhibited at the same degree.

Effect of low-dose ketamine on MACBAR of sevoflurane in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Low-dose ketamine can reduce the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane necessary to block the adrenergic response (MACBAR ) in animals. However, the effects of low-dose ketamine on the sevoflurane MACBAR in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different low doses of ketamine on the MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. After general anaesthesia induction and tracheal intubation, patients received sevoflurane anaesthesia in combination with a loading dose of saline followed by infusion or a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine followed by a continuous infusion of 5 (K1 group), 10 (K2 group) and 20 µg/kg/min (K3 group). The target concentration of end-tidal sevoflurane was maintained for at least 20 minutes before carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum stimulus. The MACBAR of sevoflurane in each group was determined by using an up-and-down sequential allocation technique. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seventy-one patients completed the study. The values of MACBAR for sevoflurane were 5.3% in the K0 , 4.8% in K1 , 3.3% in K2 and 3.2% in K3 groups. The use of ketamine significantly reduced the MACBAR of sevoflurane compared to sevoflurane alone. The K2 and K3 groups showed significantly lower values of MACBAR than that in the K1 group. However, a higher dose of ketamine in the K3 group did not further reduce the sevoflurane MACBAR . The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) values before pneumoperitoneum in the K2 and the K3 groups were significantly higher compared to those in the K0 and K1 groups. Compared with the values before pneumoperitoneum, the heart rate and MAP after pneumoperitoneum were significantly increased. Overall, the haemodynamics remained stable during the study period in all groups. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: A loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine followed by a continuous infusion of 10.0 µg/kg/min led to a significant decrease in the MACBAR of sevoflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Human plasma biomarker responses to inhalational general anaesthesia without surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative neurocognitive disorders may arise in part from adverse effects of general anaesthetics on the CNS, especially in older patients or individuals otherwise vulnerable to neurotoxicity because of systemic disease or the presence of pre-existing neuropathology. Previous studies have documented cytokine and injury biomarker responses to surgical procedures that included general anaesthesia, but it is not clear to what degree anaesthetics contribute to these responses. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of 59 healthy volunteers aged 40-80 yr who did not undergo surgery. Plasma markers of neurological injury and inflammation were measured immediately before and 5 h after induction of general anaesthesia with 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane. Biomarkers included interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neural injury (tau, neurofilament light [NF-L], and glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]). RESULTS: Baseline biomarkers were in the normal range, although NF-L and GFAP were elevated as a function of age. At 5 h after induction of anaesthesia, plasma tau, NF-L, and GFAP were significantly decreased relative to baseline. Plasma IL-6 was significantly increased after anaesthesia, but by a biologically insignificant degree (<1 pg ml-1); plasma TNF-α and CRP were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane general anaesthesia without surgery, even in older adults, did not provoke an inflammatory state or neuronal injury at a concentration that is detectable by an acute elevation of measured plasma biomarkers in the early hours after exposure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02275026.

Population Pharmacodynamics of Propofol and Sevoflurane in Healthy Volunteers Using a Clinical Score and the Patient State Index: A Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: The population pharmacodynamics of propofol and sevoflurane with or without opioids were compared using the endpoints no response to calling the person by name, tolerance to shake and shout, tolerance to tetanic stimulus, and two versions of a processed electroencephalographic measure, the Patient State Index (Patient State Index-1 and Patient State Index-2). METHODS: This is a reanalysis of previously published data. Volunteers received four anesthesia sessions, each with different drug combinations of propofol or sevoflurane, with or without remifentanil. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to study the relationship between drug concentrations, clinical endpoints, and Patient State Index-1 and Patient State Index-2. RESULTS: The C50 values for no response to calling the person by name, tolerance to shake and shout, and tolerance to tetanic stimulation for propofol (µg · ml) and sevoflurane (vol %; relative standard error [%]) were 1.62 (7.00)/0.64 (4.20), 1.85 (6.20)/0.90 (5.00), and 2.82 (15.5)/0.91 (10.0), respectively. The C50 values for Patient State Index-1 and Patient State Index-2 were 1.63 µg · ml (3.7) and 1.22 vol % (3.1) for propofol and sevoflurane. Only for sevoflurane was a significant difference found in the pharmacodynamic model for Patient State Index-2 compared with Patient State Index-1. The pharmacodynamic models for Patient State Index-1 and Patient State Index-2 as a predictor for no response to calling the person by name, tolerance to shake and shout, and tetanic stimulation were indistinguishable, with Patient State Index50 values for propofol and sevoflurane of 46.7 (5.1)/68 (3.0), 41.5 (4.1)/59.2 (3.6), and 29.5 (12.9)/61.1 (8.1), respectively. Post hoc C50 values for propofol and sevoflurane were perfectly correlated (correlation coefficient = 1) for no response to calling the person by name and tolerance to shake and shout. Post hoc C50 and Patient State Index50 values for propofol and sevoflurane for tolerance to tetanic stimulation were independent within an individual (correlation coefficient = 0). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacodynamics of propofol and sevoflurane were described on both population and individual levels using a clinical score and the Patient State Index. Patient State Index-2 has an improved performance at higher sevoflurane concentrations, and the relationship to probability of responsiveness depends on the drug used but is unaffected for Patient State Index-1 and Patient State Index-2.

Can Mathematical Modeling Explain the Measured Magnitude of the Second Gas Effect?

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical studies suggest that the magnitude of the second gas effect is considerably greater on arterial blood partial pressures of volatile agents than on end-expired partial pressures, and a significant second gas effect on blood partial pressures of oxygen and volatile agents occurs even at relatively low rates of nitrous oxide uptake. We set out to further investigate the mechanism of this phenomenon with the help of mathematical modeling. METHODS: Log-normal distributions of ventilation and blood flow were generated representing the range of ventilation-perfusion scatter seen in patients during general anesthesia. Mixtures of nominal delivered concentrations of volatile agents (desflurane, isoflurane and diethyl ether) with and without 70% nitrous oxide were mathematically modeled using steady state mass-balance principles, and the magnitude of the second gas effect calculated as an augmentation ratio for the volatile agent, defined as the partial pressure in the presence to that in the absence of nitrous oxide. RESULTS: Increasing the degree of mismatch increased the second gas effect in blood. Simultaneously, the second gas effect decreased in the gas phase. The increase in blood was greatest for the least soluble gas, desflurane, and least for the most soluble gas, diethyl ether, while opposite results applied in the gas phase. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling of ventilation-perfusion inhomogeneity confirms that the second gas effect is greater in blood than in expired gas. Gas-based minimum alveolar concentration readings may therefore underestimate the depth of anesthesia during nitrous oxide anesthesia with volatile agents. The effect on minimum alveolar concentration is likely to be most pronounced for the less soluble volatile agents in current use.

Effect of Bronchoconstriction-induced Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch on Uptake and Elimination of Isoflurane and Desflurane.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with obstructive lung diseases need anesthesia for surgery. These conditions are associated with pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (VA/Q) mismatch affecting kinetics of volatile anesthetics. Pure shunt might delay uptake of less soluble anesthetic agents but other forms of VA/Q scatter have not yet been examined. Volatile anesthetics with higher blood solubility would be less affected by VA/Q mismatch. We therefore compared uptake and elimination of higher soluble isoflurane and less soluble desflurane in a piglet model. METHODS: Juvenile piglets (26.7 ± 1.5 kg) received either isoflurane (n = 7) or desflurane (n = 7). Arterial and mixed venous blood samples were obtained during wash-in and wash-out of volatile anesthetics before and during bronchoconstriction by methacholine inhalation (100 µg/ml). Total uptake and elimination were calculated based on partial pressure measurements by micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry and literature-derived partition coefficients and assumed end-expired to arterial gradients to be negligible. VA/Q distribution was assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. RESULTS: Before methacholine inhalation, isoflurane arterial partial pressures reached 90% of final plateau within 16 min and decreased to 10% after 28 min. By methacholine nebulization, arterial uptake and elimination delayed to 35 and 44 min. Desflurane needed 4 min during wash-in and 6 min during wash-out, but with bronchoconstriction 90% of both uptake and elimination was reached within 15 min. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled methacholine induced bronchoconstriction and inhomogeneous VA/Q distribution. Solubility of inhalational anesthetics significantly influenced pharmacokinetics: higher soluble isoflurane is less affected than fairly insoluble desflurane, indicating different uptake and elimination during bronchoconstriction.

Blood lipid abnormality changes the rate of alveolar-capillary uptake of sevoflurane: a prospective, non-interventional, clinical study
.

OBJECTIVE: This research studied the influence of different blood lipid components on the rate of alveolar-capillary uptake of sevoflurane. Method: 104 patients aged 20 - 50 years undergoing elective operations under general anesthesia were mechanically ventilated through endotracheal intubation after intravenous injections of midazolam, vecuronium, fentanyl, and etomidate. They inhaled 2% sevoflurane at an oxygen flow of 2 L/min, then the inspired concentrations (FI) and expired concentrations (FA of sevoflurane were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes. These cases were divided into a normal group and an abnormal group according to the lipid levels. Then, based on the lipid criteria, those cases with abnormal lipid levels were classified into a high-triglyceride (TG) and total-cholesterol (TC) group (group TG+TC) and a group with decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (group HDL-C).The values of FA/FI and the times required to reach the titration value FA/FI = 0.8 were calculated were calculated for each group. RESULTS: Compared with the normal group, FA/FI decreased within 7 - 10 minutes (p < 0.05) and the time taken to reach the titration value was prolonged in the abnormal group (p < 0.05). The value of FA/FI decreased during 7 - 10 minutes (p < 0.05) and the time taken to reach the titration value was longer (p < 0.05) in the group TG+TC. CONCLUSIONS: The increased value of blood/gas partition coefficients (B/G) was caused by the increase in the concentrations of TG and TC in blood lipids.
.

Feasibility of Anesthesia Maintenance With Sevoflurane During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Pilot Pharmacokinetics Study.

OBJECTIVE: Adequate maintenance of hypnosis during anesthesia throughout surgery using sevoflurane alone was investigated. In addition, sevoflurane pharmacokinetics during cardiopulmonary bypass were analyzed. DESIGN: This was a pilot pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 10 patients aged between 18 and 75 years who underwent elective mitral valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The end-tidal and sevoflurane plasma concentrations were measured throughout cardiac surgery procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass. The sevoflurane plasma concentration was measured using gas chromatography. In addition, the ratio between sevoflurane alveolar concentration and inspired concentration over time (FA/FI) was analyzed to describe wash-in and wash-out curves. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hypnosis was maintained adequately throughout surgery using sevoflurane alone. The bispectral index was maintained between 40 and 60 during cardiopulmonary bypass. The end-tidal sevoflurane was significantly different before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (1.86%±0.54% v 1.30%±0.58%, respectively; p<0.001). However, the sevoflurane plasma concentration was not significantly different before and after cardiopulmonary bypass start-up (40.55 µg/mL [76.62-125.33] before cardiopulmonary bypass and 36.24 µg/mL [56.49-81-42] during cardiopulmonary bypass). This mismatch possibly can be explained by changes that occured after cardiopulmonary bypass start-up, such as reductions of body temperature (36.33°C±0.46°C v 32.98°C±2.38°C, respectively; p<0.001) and hematocrit (35.62%±3.98% v 25.5%±3.08%, respectively; p<0.001). The sevoflurane alveolar concentration varied according to sevoflurane plasma concentration and bispectral index values. No adverse events regarding sevoflurane administration during cardiopulmonary bypass were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane end-tidal values were reliable indicators of adequate anesthesia during all cardiac surgery procedures involving cardiopulmonary bypass.

Coronary Sinus Isoflurane Concentration in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Volatile anesthetic agents such as isoflurane may be associated with fewer adverse myocardial events compared with total intravenous anesthesia in cardiac surgery. The authors aimed to determine whether reasonable isoflurane concentrations at tissue level were being achieved to protect the myocardium using this agent. The isoflurane concentration in myocardium has never been measured. The primary aim was to sample coronary sinus (CS) blood and measure its isoflurane concentration. Secondary aims were to determine whether the CS blood concentration would equilibrate with the arterial blood concentration and the relationship of CS blood concentration with oxygenator exhaust isoflurane concentrations during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 23 patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB and isoflurane. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Shortly after initiation of CPB and insertion of a CS retrograde cardioplegia catheter but before aortic cross-clamping, CS blood was aspirated, followed by radial artery blood, which then were analyzed for isoflurane with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The oxygenator exhaust isoflurane level was measured with an anesthetic gas analyzer. The mean arterial and CS isoflurane concentrations were 87.7 ± 50.1 and 73.0 ± 42.9 µg/mL, respectively. There was a significant mean difference of 14.7 µg/mL (95% confidence interval 6.7-22.8) between CS and arterial isoflurane concentrations. Oxygenator exhaust isoflurane levels were correlated positively with those in the CS blood (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and arterial blood (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study in which CS blood was sampled and measured for isoflurane concentration. The CS isoflurane concentration could be estimated from the isoflurane concentration in the oxygenator exhaust gas. However, the value of this relationship is limited because the CS isoflurane concentration does not accurately represent its myocardial levels during CPB.

Dynamic thiol disulphide homeostasis in operating theater personnel exposed to anesthetic gases.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between dynamic thiol/disulphide homeostasis and occupational exposure to volatile anesthetic gases in operating theater personnel. Decreased blood thiol levels and raised blood disulphide levels serve as biomarkers of oxidative stress. METHODS: We included 65 subjects occupationally exposed and 55 unexposed healthy medical professionals into the study. A novel method enabled separate measurements of components involved in dynamic thiol/disulphide homeostasis (native thiol, disulphide, and total thiol). To control for the potential confounding effect on oxidative stress of psychological symptoms potentially caused by occupational stress, we used scores obtained from four different anxiety and depression inventories. RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation native thiol was found to be 433.35 ± 30.68 in the exposed group, lower than among controls, 446.61 ± 27.8 (P = 0.02). Disulphide in the exposed group was 15.78 ± 5.12, higher than among controls, 12.14 ± 5.33 (P < 0.001). After adjusting for anxiety and depression scores, age and gender, native thiol remained lower and disulphide higher in the exposed group (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dynamic thiol/disulphide homeostasis in workers exposed to anesthetic gases was found to be disturbed after adjusting for the possible contribution of anxiety. We infer that this is due to the oxidative effect of exposure to anesthetic gases.

Effects of anaesthesia on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of LoVo colon cancer cells in vitro.

Tumour cell proliferation, invasion and apoptosis are crucial steps in tumour metastasis. We evaluated the effect of serum from patients undergoing colon cancer surgery receiving thoracic epidural and propofol anaesthesia on colon cancer cell biology. Patients were randomly assigned to receive propofol anaesthesia with a concomitant thoracic epidural (PEA, n = 20) or sevoflurane anaesthesia with opioid analgesia (SGA, n = 20). Venous blood was obtained before induction of anaesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively. The LoVo colon cancer cells were cultured with patient serum from both groups and the effects on proliferation, invasion and apoptosis were measured. Twenty-four hours after surgery, the absorbance value of LoVo cells at 10% serum concentration from PEA was decreased when compared with SGA (0.302 (0.026) vs 0.391 (0.066), p = 0.005). The inhibitory rate of LoVo cells at 10% serum concentration from PEA was higher than that from SGA (p = 0.004) 24 h after surgery. The number of invasive LoVo cells at 10% serum concentration from PEA was reduced when compared with SGA (44 (4) vs 62 (4), p < 0.001). Exposure of LoVo cells to postoperative serum from patients receiving PEA led to a higher luminescence ratio (apoptosis) than those receiving SGA (0.36 (0.04) vs 0.27 (0.05), p < 0.001). Serum from patients receiving PEA for colon cancer surgery inhibited proliferation and invasion of LoVo cells and induced apoptosis in vitro more than that from patients receiving SGA. Anaesthetic technique might influence the serum milieu in a way that affects cancer cell biology and, thereby, tumour metastastasis.

Sevoflurane and Isoflurane-Pharmacokinetics, Hemodynamic Stability, and Cardioprotective Effects During Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of sevoflurane and isoflurane during use of minimized extracorporeal circulation to perform coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Furthermore, cardiovascular stability during bypass and the postoperative release of troponins were evaluated. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 31 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTIONS: The pharmacokinetic measurements of the concentration of the volatile anesthetics in the arterial and venous blood, air inlet, air outlet, and gas exhaust of the extracorporeal circulation were recorded. Secondary end-points were cardiovascular stability during bypass, amount of postoperative release of troponin, time to extubation, time to discharge from the intensive care unit and the hospital, and 30-day mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the protocol. The pharmacokinetics of isoflurane and sevoflurane were almost identical, with a rapid wash-in (time to reach 50% of arterial steady state) concentration of 0.87±0.97 minutes and 1.14±0.35 minutes for isoflurane and sevoflurane, respectively, and a biphasic venous elimination with a terminal half-life of approximately 10 minutes for both compounds. There was a correlation between the gas inlet and the gas exhaust of the extracorporeal circulation. No difference in cardiovascular stability was found. High-sensitivity troponin concentrations on the first postoperative morning were 0.355±0.312 µg/mL and 0.225±0.111 µg/mL in the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups, respectively (p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: The study found similar pharmacokinetics regarding wash-in and wash-out for sevoflurane and isoflurane. In addition, no difference in cardiovascular stability was found. The markers of cardiac damage were not different between the two anesthetics. Based on these data, sevoflurane and isoflurane might be used equivalently in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with extracorporeal circulation.

Sevoflurane Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have suggested that the cardioprotective effects of halogenated anesthetics in cardiac surgery result in reduced cardiac biomarker release compared with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). These findings came from relatively small randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. The authors of this study hypothesized that the beneficial effects of volatile anesthetics translate into a reduced length of hospital stay after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing elective CABG surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned randomly to 2 following groups: propofol-based TIVA group (n = 431) and sevoflurane group (n = 437). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was hospital length of stay, and the secondary endpoint included postoperative troponin T and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide release and mortality. In the sevoflurane group, a reduced length of hospital stay was observed compared with the propofol-based TIVA group (10 [9-11] days v 14 [10-16], p<0.001) as were reductions in cardiac troponin T release (0.18 ng/mL v 0.57 ng/mL at 24 hours, p<0.001), in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide release (633 pg/mL v 878 pg/mL at 24 hours, p<0.001; 482 pg/mL v 1,036 pg/mL at 48 hours, p<0.001), and in mortality at 1-year follow up (17.8% v 24.8%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia with sevoflurane reduced cardiac biomarker release and length of hospital stay after CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass surgery compared with propofol-based TIVA with a possible reduction in 1-year mortality.

Volatile anaesthetics reduce neutrophil inflammatory response by interfering with CXC receptor-2 signalling.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests a protective effect of volatile anaesthetics in ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R)-injury, and the accumulation of neutrophils is a crucial event. Pro-inflammatory cytokines carrying the C-X-C-motif including interleukin-8 (IL-8) and CXC-ligand 1 (CXCL1) activate CXC receptor-1 (CXCR1; stimulated by IL-8), CXC receptor-2 (CXCR2; stimulated by IL-8 and CXCL1), or both to induce CD11b-dependent neutrophil transmigration. Inhibition of CXCR1, CXCR2, or both reduces I/R-injury by preventing neutrophil accumulation. We hypothesized that interference with CXCR1/CXCR2 signalling contributes to the well-established beneficial effect of volatile anaesthetics in I/R-injury. METHODS: Isolated human neutrophils were stimulated with IL-8 or CXCL1 and exposed to volatile anaesthetics (sevoflurane/desflurane). Neutrophil migration was assessed using an adapted Boyden chamber. Expression of CD11b, CXCR1, and CXCR2 was measured by flow cytometry. Blocking antibodies against CXCR1/CXCR2/CD11b and phorbol myristate acetate were used to investigate specific pathways. RESULTS: Volatile anaesthetics reduced CD11b-dependent neutrophil transmigration induced by IL-8 by >30% and CD11b expression by 18 and 27% with sevoflurane/desflurane, respectively. This effect was independent of CXCR1/CXCR2 expression and CXCR1/CXCR2 endocytosis. Inhibition of CXCR1 signalling did not affect downregulation of CD11b with volatile anaesthetics. Blocking of CXCR2-signalling neutralized effects by volatile anaesthetics on CD11b expression. Specific stimulation of CXCR2 with CXCL1 was sufficient to induce upregulation of CD11b, which was impaired with volatile anaesthetics. No effect of volatile anaesthetics was observed with direct stimulation of protein kinase C located downstream of CXCR1/CXCR2. CONCLUSION: Volatile anaesthetics attenuate neutrophil inflammatory responses elicited by CXC cytokines through interference with CXCR2 signalling. This might contribute to the beneficial effect of volatile anaesthetics in I/R-injury.

Blood/Gas partition coefficients for isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane in a clinically relevant patient population.

BACKGROUND: The blood/gas partition coefficient of a certain volatile anesthetic is of clinical importance because it determines its velocity of uptake into and elimination from the body of a patient and thus its pharmacokinetic behavior. To date, the blood/gas partition coefficients of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane have been measured in small numbers of subjects or in particular study groups, for example, healthy volunteers, patients experiencing a common kind of disease, or mothers immediately after giving birth. The objective of this study was to determine the blood/gas partition coefficients of these volatile anesthetics at 37°C in a larger clinically relevant and adult patient population. Furthermore, we tested whether age, gender, body mass index, hemoglobin concentration, or hematocrit had an influence on the coefficients. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 120 fasting operative patients with ASA physical status I to III and aged 19 to 86 years. All subjects were randomly enrolled in study groups for the separate determinations of the blood/gas partition coefficients of isoflurane (n = 41), sevoflurane (n = 41), and desflurane (n = 38) by headspace gas chromatography. To check the quality of the measurements, we determined the distilled water/gas partition coefficients of those anesthetics and compared them with previously published values. RESULTS: We found a blood/gas partition coefficient of 1.45 ± 0.12 (mean ± SD) for isoflurane, 0.74 ± 0.06 for sevoflurane, and 0.57 ± 0.04 for desflurane. Values of this study are 5.07%, 12.12%, and 7.55% higher for isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane, respectively, than the previously published mean values (all P ≤ 0.001). There were only trends for small correlations between the blood/gas partition coefficient of isoflurane and hemoglobin concentration (Pearson r = 0.32; P = 0.041) and hematocrit (r = 0.37; P = 0.016). We found no other potentially significant correlations of the partition coefficients with patient age, body mass index, hemoglobin concentration, or hematocrit (all remaining P > 0.069). Furthermore, the coefficients did not differ significantly between female and male patients. The evaluation of the distilled water/gas partition coefficients of isoflurane (0.59 ± 0.04), sevoflurane (0.37 ± 0.04), and desflurane (0.27 ± 0.03) proved the validity of the gas chromatography method used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The blood/gas partition coefficients of the modern volatile anesthetics, in particular, those of sevoflurane and desflurane, may be higher than that has been hitherto reported. Therefore, their uptake and elimination may occur more slowly in some patients than has been supposed. The blood/gas partition coefficients of isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane measured in this study appear to be representative because they were determined in a clinically and numerically relevant patient cohort.

Biomarkers of inflammation in major vascular surgery: a prospective randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgery induces inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines are associated with post-operative complications. In cardiac surgery, it has been shown that volatile anaesthetics have cardioprotective properties. We explored whether sevoflurane affects the pro-inflammatory response favourably compared with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) after surgery. METHODS: We measured monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 perioperatively and evaluated if the anaesthetic regimen affected these mediators. Our hypothesis was that sevoflurane-based anaesthesia is associated with a reduced release of biomarkers of inflammation compared with TIVA with propofol/remifentanil. RESULTS: In the total population, MCP-1, MMP-9, IL-6 and IL-8 increased 30 min after arrival intensive care unit, compared with before surgery (P < 0.001), whereas CRP and VCAM-1 transiently declined (P < 0.001). From 30 min after arrival intensive care unit to 1st post-operative day, MCP-1 and IL-6 levels declined (P < 0.001), CRP and VCAM-1 increased (P < 0.001), whereas MMP-9 and IL-8 were not significantly altered. Pre-operatively there were no significant differences in any variables between the two anaesthetic groups. Lower levels of MCP-1 and IL-8 (P < 0.001) and higher levels of IL-6 and MMP-9 (P = 0.003) were found in the sevoflurane group, compared with the TIVA group 30 min post-operatively. CRP and VCAM-1 levels did not differ. There were no significant differences between the two anaesthetic groups before surgery or at 1st post-operative day. CONCLUSION: We found an inflammatory response during the observation period, which was modified by the anaesthetic regimen in the early phase. This short-lasting difference is probably too short to support a cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane compared with TIVA in open abdominal aortic surgery.