Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 11.499
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 379, 2024 Oct 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39462406

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the interaction of intraoperative stress hyperglycemia with monocyte functions and their impact on major adverse events (MAEs) in acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients who underwent open repair surgery. METHODS: A total of 321 adults who underwent open surgery for AAD at two tertiary medical centers in China were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was defined as the incidence and characteristics of perioperative stress hyperglycemia. The secondary endpoints included the incidence of postoperative MAEs, postoperative monocyte counts and inflammatory cytokine expression. Multi-logistic, linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to establish relationships between intraoperative time-weighted average glucose (TWAG), day-one postoperative monocyte counts, serum inflammatory cytokines and postoperative outcomes. In addition, in vitro experiments were conducted to evaluate changes in the inflammatory features of monocytes under high glucose conditions. RESULTS: Intraoperative hyperglycemia, as indicated by a TWAG level over 142 mg/dL, was associated with elevated postoperative monocyte counts and inflammatory cytokines, which correlated with extended intensive care unit (ICU) stays and worsened outcomes. In vitro, high glucose treatment induced mitochondrial impairment in monocytes, increased the release of inflammatory cytokines and the proportion of classical monocytes from AAD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative stress hyperglycemia, in combination with day-one postoperative monocyte counts, were clinically significant for predicting adverse outcomes in AAD patients undergoing open repair surgery. Elevated glucose concentrations shaped the inflammatory features of monocytes in AAD by impairing mitochondrial functions.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Biomarcadores , Glucemia , Citocinas , Hiperglucemia , Mediadores de Inflamación , Monocitos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/sangre , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Monocitos/metabolismo , China/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Biomarcadores/sangre , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Citocinas/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Enfermedad Aguda , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas , Incidencia , Células THP-1 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(3): 569-576, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923021

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The MANTA device is a plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) designed for large bore femoral arterial access site closure. It showed promising results in transcatheter aortic valve replacement cases. In this study, we report our results and evaluate the MANTA VCD in percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR). METHODS: All data of consecutive patients who underwent an elective pEVAR between October 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients at least one common femoral artery was intended to close with the MANTA VCD. Depending on the sheath size, the 14Fr or 18Fr MANTA VCD was used. On the preoperative computed tomography scan, the diameter of the common femoral artery (CFA) was measured and the amount of calcification based on the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) was scored. Primary outcome was procedural technical success. Procedural technical success was defined as placement of the MANTA closure device resulting in vascular closure with patent CFA, without requiring immediate open or endovascular surgery. The secondary outcomes were access site complications requiring reintervention and all-cause mortality at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 152 consecutive patients underwent pEVAR with 291 common femoral artery closure procedures with the Manta VCD. Mean age was 74.1 ± 6.4 years, with a mean body mass index of 27.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2. The mean diameter of the CFA was 10.5 ± 1.9 mm. In 52.6% of the cases, there were no calcification on the preoperative computed tomography scan. The 18Fr and 14Fr Manta VCD were used 169 and 122 times, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. Major vascular complications were reported in 4.5% of the cases, without any death-related events. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the procedural technical success, major vascular complications and all-cause mortality at 30-day follow-up of the MANTA vascular closure device in 152 pEVAR patients with 291 common femoral artery closure procedures. The technical success rate was 96,6%. Major vascular complications were reported in 4.5% of the cases, without any death related events. We concluded that the MANTA device is a safe and feasible option with a high rate of technical success in patients undergoing pEVAR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(3): 604-611, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904580

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite regulatory challenges, device availability, and rapidly expanding techniques, off-label endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs) has expanded in the past decade. Given the lack of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved endovascular technology to treat cAAs, we performed a national census to better understand volume and current practice patterns in the United States. METHODS: Targeted sampling identified vascular surgeons with experience in off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. An electronic survey was distributed with institutional review board approval from the University of Rochester to 261 individuals with a response rate of 38% (n = 98). RESULTS: A total of 93 respondents (95%) reported off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. Mean age was 45.7 ± 8.3 years, and 84% were male. Most respondents (59%) were within the first 10 years of practice, and 69% trained at institutions with a high-volume of off-label endovascular procedures for complex aortic aneurysms with or without a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (PS-IDE). Twelve respondents from 11 institutions reported institutional PS-IDEs for physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), in-situ laser fenestration (ISLF), or parallel grafting technique (PGT), including sites with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. Eighty-nine unique institutions reported elective off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 20.2 ± 16.5 cases/year and ∼1757 total cases/year nationally. Eighty reported urgent/emergent off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 5.7 ± 5.4 cases/year and ∼499 total cases/year nationally. There was no correlation between high-volume endovascular institutions (>15 cases/year) and institutions with high volumes of open surgical repair for cAAs (>15 cases/year; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.5; P = .34). Elective techniques included PMEG (70%), ISLF (30%), hybrid PMEG/ISLF (18%), and PGT (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 63% of respondents. Techniques for emergent endovascular treatment of complex aortic disease included PMEG (52%), ISLF (40%), PGT (20%), and hybrid-PMEG/ISLF (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 41% of respondents. Thirty-nine percent of respondents always or frequently offer referrals to institutions with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. The most common barrier for referral to PS-IDE centers included geographic distance (48%), longitudinal relationship with patient (45%), and costs associated with travel (33%). Only 61% of respondents participate in the Vascular Quality Initiative for complex endovascular aneurysm repair, and only 57% maintain a prospective institutional database. Eighty-six percent reported interest in a national collaborative database for off-label endovascular repair of cAA. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of off-label endovascular repair of cAAs are likely underrepresented in the literature based on this national census. PMEG was the most common technique for elective and emergent procedures. Under-reported off-label endovascular repair of cAA outcomes data appears to be limited by non-standardized PS-IDE reporting to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the lack of Vascular Quality Initiative participation and prospective institutional data collection. Most participants are interested in a national collaborative database for endovascular repair of cAAs.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Adulto , Prótesis Vascular , Censos
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(5): 1079-1089, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: With an aging patient population, an increasing number of octogenarians are undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the United States. Multiple studies have shown that, for the general population, use of local anesthetic (LA) for EVAR is associated with improved short-term and long-term outcomes as compared with performing these operations under general anesthesia (GA). Therefore, this study aimed to study the association of LA for elective EVARs with perioperative outcomes, among octogenarians. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2021) was used to conduct this study. Octogenarians (Aged ≥80 years) were selected and sorted into two study groups: LA (Group I) and GA (Group II). Our primary outcomes were length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, return to operating room, cardiopulmonary complications, and discharge location. RESULTS: Of the 16,398 selected patients, 1197 patients (7.3%) were included in Group I, and 15,201 patients (92.7%) were in Group II. Procedural time was significantly shorter for the LA group (114.6 vs 134.6; P < .001), as was estimated blood loss (152 vs 222 cc; P < .001). Length of stay was significantly shorter (1.8 vs 2.6 days; P < .001), and patients were more likely to be discharged home (LA 88.8% vs GA 86.9%; P = .036) in the LA group. Group I also experienced fewer pulmonary complications; only 0.17% experienced pneumonia and 0.42% required ventilator support compared with 0.64% and 1.02% in Group II, respectively. This finding corresponded to fewer days in the intensive care unit for Group I (0.41 vs 0.69 days; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in 30-day mortality cardiac, renal, or access site-related complications. Return to operating room was also equivocal between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed GA was associated with a significantly longer length of stay and significantly higher rates of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59; P < .001 and AOR, 1.40; P = .025, respectively). When stratified by the New York Heart Association classification system, classes I, II, III, and IV (1.55; P < .001; 1.26; P = .029; 2.03; P < .001; 4.07; P < .001, respectively) were associated with significantly longer hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LA for EVARs in octogenarians is associated with shorter lengths of stay, fewer respiratory complications, and home discharge. These patients also experienced shorter procedure times and less blood loss. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality, return to operating room, or access-related complications. LA for octogenarians undergoing EVAR should be considered more frequently to shorten hospital stays and decrease complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Octogenarios , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anestésicos Locales , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(6): 1315-1325, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382641

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term results of stented-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination (STABILISE) in patients with aortic dissection with the implementation of volumetric analysis. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. From May 2017 to September 2022, 42 patients underwent STABILISE for acute complicated or subacute high-risk aortic dissection. STABILISE was completed with distal extended endovascular aortic repair in 24 patients. A computed tomography scan was performed at baseline, before hospital discharge, and at 1, 3, and 5 years. Perfused total aortic, true lumen, and false lumen volumes were assessed for thoracic, visceral, and aorto-iliac segment. The ratio between false lumen and total volume was named perfusion dissection index (PDI). Complete remodeling was defined as PDI = 0, and positive remodeling as PDI ≤0.1. RESULTS: Technical success was 97.6%. No 30-day deaths, spinal cord injuries, or retrograde dissections were observed. Mean follow-up was 44 ± 19.4 months. Thoracic diameter was lower at last available computed tomography scan (36.7 vs 33.0 mm; P = .01). Aortic growth >5 mm was observed in 9.5% of the patients. Thoracic and visceral aortic complete remodeling were 92.8% and 83.3%, respectively, with no difference between acute and subacute group. Distal extended endovascular aortic repair significantly increased complete remodeling in the aorto-iliac segment, compared with STABILISE alone (69.6% vs 21.4%; P < .001). Freedom from vascular reinterventions at 3 years was 83.1% (95% confidence interval, 71.5%-96.6%). Total PDI ≤0.1 at first postoperative control was a predictor of vascular reinterventions (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: STABILISE is a safe and feasible technique associated with high mid-term rates of complete remodeling in the thoracic and visceral aorta. Volumetric analysis allows the quantification of aortic remodeling and represents a predictor of aortic reinterventions.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Stents , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Remodelación Vascular , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reoperación , Aortografía , Factores de Riesgo
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(4): 1025-1034.e4, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Machine learning techniques have shown excellent performance in three-dimensional medical image analysis, but have not been applied to acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (auTBAD) using Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-defined aortic zones. The purpose of this study was to establish a trained, automatic machine learning aortic zone segmentation model to facilitate performance of an aortic zone volumetric comparison between patients with auTBAD based on the rate of aortic growth. METHODS: Patients with auTBAD and serial imaging were identified. For each patient, imaging characteristics from two computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed: (1) the baseline CT angiography (CTA) at the index admission and (2) either the most recent surveillance CTA or the most recent CTA before an aortic intervention. Patients were stratified into two comparative groups based on aortic growth: rapid growth (diameter increase of ≥5 mm/year) and no or slow growth (diameter increase of <5 mm/year). Deidentified images were imported into an open source software package for medical image analysis and images were annotated based on SVS/STS criteria for aortic zones. Our model was trained using four-fold cross-validation. The segmentation output was used to calculate aortic zone volumes from each imaging study. RESULTS: Of 59 patients identified for inclusion, rapid growth was observed in 33 patients (56%) and no or slow growth was observed in 26 patients (44%). There were no differences in baseline demographics, comorbidities, admission mean arterial pressure, number of discharge antihypertensives, or high-risk imaging characteristics between groups (P > .05 for all). Median duration between baseline and interval CT was 1.07 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.38-2.57). Postdischarge aortic intervention was performed in 13 patients (22%) at a mean of 1.5 ± 1.2 years, with no difference between the groups (P > .05). Among all patients, the largest relative percent increases in zone volumes over time were found in zone 4 (13.9%; IQR, -6.82 to 35.1) and zone 5 (13.4%; IQR, -7.78 to 37.9). There were no differences in baseline zone volumes between groups (P > .05 for all). The average Dice coefficient, a performance measure of the model output, was 0.73. Performance was best in zone 5 (0.84) and zone 9 (0.91). CONCLUSIONS: We describe an automatic deep learning segmentation model incorporating SVS-defined aortic zones. The open source, trained model demonstrates concordance to the manually segmented aortas with the strongest performance in zones 5 and 9, providing a framework for further clinical applications. In our limited sample, there were no differences in baseline aortic zone volumes between patients with rapid growth and patients with no or slow growth.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Aortografía , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Aprendizaje Profundo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Enfermedad Aguda , Automatización , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Imagenología Tridimensional , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Progresión de la Enfermedad
7.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(5): 1396-1406, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39074740

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of aortic dissections may be complicated by inadequate sealing zones, persistent false lumen perfusion, and limited space for catheter manipulation and target artery incorporation. The aim of this study was to describe the indications, technical success, and early outcomes of transcatheter electrosurgical septotomy (TES) during endovascular repair of aortic dissections. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients treated by endovascular repair of aortic dissections with adjunctive TES in two centers between 2021 and 2023. End points were technical success, defined by successful septotomy without dislodgment of the lamella or target artery occlusion, and 30-day rates of major adverse events (MAEs). RESULTS: Among 197 patients treated by endovascular repair for aortic dissections, 36 patients (18%) (median age, 61.5 years (interquartile range, 55.0-72.5 years; 83% male) underwent adjunctive TES for acute (n = 3 [8%]), subacute (n = 1 [3%]), or chronic postdissection aneurysms (n = 32 [89%]). Indications for TES were severe true lumen (TL) compression (≤16 mm) in 28 patients (78%), target vessel origin from false lumen in 19 (53%), creation of suitable landing zone in 12 (33%), and organ/limb malperfusion in four (11%). Endovascular repair included fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in 18 patients (50%), thoracic EVAR/EVAR/PETTICOAT in 11 (31%), and arch branch repair in 7 (19%). All patients had dissections extending through zones 5 to 7, and 28 patients (78%) underwent TES across the renal-mesenteric segment. Technical success of TES was 92% (33/36) for all patients and 97% (32/33) among those with subacute or chronic postdissection aneurysms. There were three technical failures, including two patients with acute dissections with inadvertent superior mesenteric artery dissection in one patient and distal dislodgement of the dissection lamella in two patients. There were no arterial disruptions. The mean postseptotomy aortic lumen increased from 13.2 ± 4.8 mm to 28.4 ± 6.8 mm (P < .001). All 18 patients treated by fenestrated-branched EVAR had successful incorporation of 78 target arteries. There was one early death (3%) from stroke, and three patients (8%) had major adverse events. After a median follow-up of 8 months (interquartile range, 4.5-13.5 months), 13 patients (36%) had secondary interventions, and two (6%) died from non-aortic-related events. There were no other complications associated with TES. CONCLUSIONS: TES is an adjunctive technique that may optimize sealing zones and luminal aortic diameter during endovascular repair of subacute and chronic postdissection. Although no arterial disruptions or target vessel loss occurred, patients with acute dissections are prone to technical failures related to dislodgement of the lamella.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Electrocirugia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Electrocirugia/efectos adversos , Electrocirugia/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(2): 322-325, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091330

RESUMEN

Aortic wall injuries may occur after interventional treatment of aortic coarctation (CoA), especially after balloon angioplasty. We reported on a patient who presented with an intra-stent aneurysm formation after direct stenting of a native near atretic aortic CoA by using a BeGraft Aortic stent. This evidence supports the need to maintain a strict follow-up protocol. A computed tomography scan is mandatory, after covered stent implantation as well, especially in high-risk cases and even in the absence of any immediate apparent complication.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Coartación Aórtica , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aorta/lesiones , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/etiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Coartación Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Coartación Aórtica/cirugía
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(6): 1074-1077, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577923

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has traditionally been indicated for the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, in this case report, we describe a successful TAVI procedure in a 46-year-old male patient who had previously undergone David aortic valve-sparing aortic root replacement for type 1 aortic dissection. The patient presented with aortic valve insufficiency 4 years after the initial surgery and was subsequently treated with a 34 mm Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R prosthesis via TAVI. This case highlights the feasibility of TAVI as a viable treatment option for postoperative aortic valve insufficiency in patients with prior ascending aortic or aortic arch surgery.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Masculino , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/etiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Diseño de Prótesis , Prótesis Vascular , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía
10.
Eur Radiol ; 34(11): 7275-7284, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777904

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the short-term/long-term impact of pulmonary artery intramural hematoma (PA-IMH) in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) following surgical repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with ATAAD who received surgical repair at Beijing and Yunnan Fuwai Hospital in 2010-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with hemorrhage extending along the PA were identified as the PA-IMH group. Multivariable logistics regression was used to obtain the odds ratio (OR), and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate. RESULTS: Of the 2046 ATAAD patients, 324 (15.8%) patients were identified with PA-IMH, and 1722 (84.2%) were without PA-IMH. PA-IMH had a higher prevalence in patients with older age, female gender, aortic IMH, and type II aortic dissection. PA-IMH patients incurred excess early mortality compared with non-PA-IMH patients (9.3% vs. 5.6%, OR = 1.86, 95%CI 1.19-2.91, p = 0.006). The results were stable in the subgroup analysis, with an increased risk in older (> 70 years) or DeBakey type II ATAAD patients. Notably, an increase in the degree and extent of PA-IMH exacerbated the risk of early mortality. However, after landmark analysis at 30-day postsurgery, no significant difference was noted in the long-term outcomes between PA-IMH and non-PA-IMH groups (p = 0.440). The 5-year survival rates were 87.1% (95%CI: 83.3%, 91.1%) and 90.1% (95%CI: 88.5%, 91.7%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PA-IMH in ATAAD patients is common and is independently associated with increased early mortality after surgical repair, especially in those with older age (> 70) or type II dissection. However, such detrimental effects do not persist in the long-term follow-up among patients who survived hospital discharge. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We confirmed that PA-IMH significantly increases early postoperative mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection, especially in older patients or DeBakey type II dissection. This should prompt further investigation of the incremental role of PA-IMH in this pathology. KEY POINTS: Acute type A aortic dissection mortality gets worse when pulmonary artery intramural hematoma is present. Pulmonary artery-intramural hematoma increased the risk of early mortality but not affect long-term prognosis. Further research should investigate the effects of pulmonary artery intramural thrombus on aortic dissection.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Hematoma , Arteria Pulmonar , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
11.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(4): 444-453, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719137

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Residual aortic dissection (AD) following DeBakey type I AD repair is associated with a high rate of adverse events that need additional intervention or surgery. This study aimed to identify clinical and early post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging factors associated with adverse events in patients with type I AD after ascending aorta replacement. METHODS: This single centre, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with type I AD who underwent ascending aorta replacement from January 2011 to December 2017 and post-operative CTA within three months. The primary outcome was AD related adverse events, defined as AD related death and re-operation due to aortic aneurysm or impending rupture. The location and size of the primary intimal tears, aortic diameter, and false lumen status were evaluated. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with AD related adverse events. A decision tree model was used to classify patients as high or low risk. RESULTS: Of 103 participants (55.43 ± 13.94 years; 49.5% male), 24 (23.3%) experienced AD related adverse events. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, connective tissue disease (hazard ratio [HR] 15.33; p < .001), maximum aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm (HR 4.90; p < .001), and multiple (three or more) intimal tears (HR 7.12; p < .001) were associated with AD related adverse events. The three year cumulative survival free from AD related events was lower in the high risk group with aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm and multiple intimal tears (41.7% vs. 90.9%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Early post-operative CTA findings indicating a maximum aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm and multiple intimal tears may predict a higher risk of adverse events. These findings suggest the need for careful monitoring and more vigilant management approaches in these cases.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 239, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral malperfusion (CM) is a common comorbidity in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), which is associated with high mortality and poor neurological prognosis. This meta-analysis investigated the surgical strategy of ATAAD patients with CM, aiming to compare the difference in therapeutic effectiveness between the central repair-first and the early reperfusion-first according to clinical outcomes. METHODS: The meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted based on studies sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature database, in which cases of ATAAD with CM underwent surgical repair were included. Data for baseline characteristics, mortality, survival were extracted, and risk ratio (RR) values and the pooled mortality were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 17 retrospective studies were analyzed, including 1010 cases of ATAAD with CM underwent surgical repair. The pooled early mortality in early reperfusion group was lower (8.1%; CI, 0.02 to 0.168) than that in the central repair group (16.2%; CI, 0.115 to 0.216). The pooled long-term mortality was 7.9% in the early reperfusion cohort and 17.4% the central repair-first cohort, without a statistically significant heterogeneity (I [2] = 51.271%; p = 0.056). The mean time of symptom-onset-to-the-operation-room in all the reports was 8.87 ± 12.3 h. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggested that early reperfusion-first may achieved better outcomes compared to central repair-first in ATAAD patients complicated with CM to some extent. Early operation and early restoration of cerebral perfusion may reduce the occurrence of some neurological complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (No. CRD CRD42023475629) on Nov. 8th, 2023.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad Aguda , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/cirugía , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/fisiopatología , Adulto , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Reperfusión , Tiempo de Tratamiento
13.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 556, 2024 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39402485

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to retrospectively analyze the clinical features of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) based on Sun's modified classification, and to investigate whether the Sun's modified classification can be used to assess the risk of preoperative rupture. METHODS: Clinical data was collected between January 2018 and June 2019. Data included patient demographics, history of disease, type of dissection according to the Sun's modified classification, time of onset, biochemical tests, and preoperative rupture. RESULTS: A total of 387 patients with TAAAD who met the inclusion criteria of Sun's modified classification were included. There were more complex types, with 75, 151 and 140 patients in the type A1C, A2C and A3C groups, respectively. The age of the entire group of patients was 51.46 ± 12.65 years and 283 (73.1%) were male. The time from onset to the emergency room was 25.37 ± 30.78 h. There were a few cases of TAAAD combined with stroke, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, and lower extremity and organ ischemia in the complex type group. The white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NEC) and blood amylase differed significantly between the groups. Three independent risk factors for preoperative rupture were identified: neutrophil count, blood potassium ion level, and platelet count. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the Sun's modified classification could not be used to assess the risk of preoperative rupture in TAAAD. CONCLUSION: TAAAD was classified as the complex type in most patients. WBC, NEC and blood amylase were significantly different between the groups. NEC and serum potassium ion level were independent risk factors for preoperative rupture of TAAAD, while platelet count was its protective factor. More samples are needed to determine whether Sun's modified classification can be used to evaluate the risk of preoperative rupture.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Disección Aórtica/clasificación , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/sangre , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Aguda , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/clasificación , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/sangre , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/clasificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta/sangre , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Recuento de Leucocitos
14.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 58(1): 2382477, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087759

RESUMEN

Background. Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection confers a risk for significant bleeding. We analyzed the impact of massive bleeding on complications after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Methods. Patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from the retrospective multicenter Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (NORCAAD) database 2005-2014 were eligible. Massive bleeding was defined according to the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding. The primary outcome measure was early mortality and secondary outcome measures were perioperative stroke, mechanical ventilation more than 48 h, new-onset dialysis, and intensive care unit stay. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in covariates. Results. Nine hundred ninety-seven patients were included, of whom 403 (40.4%) had massive bleeding. In the propensity score-matched cohort (344 pairs), patients with massive bleeding had higher 30-day mortality (17.2 versus 7.6%, p < .001), mechanical ventilation more than 48 h (52.8 versus 22.6%, p < .001), perioperative stroke (24.3 versus 14.8%, p = .002), new-onset dialysis (22.5 versus 4.9%, p < .001), and longer intensive care unit stay (6 versus 3 days, p < .001), compared with patients without massive bleeding. Risk factors for massive bleeding were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative clopidogrel or ticagrelor therapy, DeBakey type I dissection, and localized or generalized malperfusion. Conclusions. Massive bleeding in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection is associated with a markedly increased risk for severe complications as well as early death. Further improvement of surgical technique and pharmacological optimization of coagulation is paramount to possibly improve outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/mortalidad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Diálisis Renal , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 67-76, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582209

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (fEVAR) involves deploying a covered stent into the aorta followed by multiple visceral stents through fenestrations in the main body of graft. The most commonly used large sheaths for cannulation of visceral vessels are the Gore DrySeal Flex, Cook Performer Check-Flo, and Medtronic Sentrant. None of these sheaths were designed for the insertion of multiple sheaths, and so a slow but steady leakage of blood occurs during the procedure. The aim of this paper is to assess in an in vitro setting which large bore sheath has the best valve for use when multiple smaller sheaths are inserted through it. METHODS: Three large bore introducer sheaths (LBISs) were used for this study, The Gore DrySeal Flex LBIS, Medtronic Sentrant LBIS and Cook Performer Check-Flo LBIS. A test rig was constructed, made of an 18-liter fluid reservoir mounted vertically and receiving a constant supply of water from a domestic water supply which flowed into the reservoir and out of an overflow. The reservoir was connected to the LBIS by a vertical plastic pipe with an internal diameter of 40 mm and an isolation valve. The LBIS was connected to the isolation valve by inserting the LBIS up a flexible silicone tube connected to the isolation valve. The LBIS was subject to a constant column/pressure of water and fluid leakage from the LBIS was collected in a plastic pot/tray placed underneath the LBIS. The leakage rates through each LBIS were determined for the following smaller diameter sheath combinations inserted through the valve, one 6 French Sheath, two 6 French Sheaths, two 6 French Sheaths and one 7 French Sheath. This was done to closely mimic a fEVAR procedure in vitro. The procedure was to insert different sheath combinations through the nonreturn valves in the LBIS and measure the volume of fluid that leaked through the valves. The leaked fluid was weighed, and the weight was converted to volume using the density of water (1 g/ml). RESULTS: The average (mean) leakage rates for each LBIS and each sheath combination showed that leakage rates when only one sheath was inserted were very low. For all 3 LBIS's tested, the leakage rates increased dramatically when multiple sheaths were inserted. The Medtronic LBIS leaked the most, followed by Cook, followed by Gore. For the Cook LBIS, the leakage rates exhibited with 2 × 6 French sheaths were approx. 106 times greater than those for the Gore LBIS and 5 times greater for the 2 × 6 French +1 × 7 French sheath combination. A similar comparison for the Medtronic LBIS versus the Gore LBIS yields factors of 132 and 8. CONCLUSIONS: Leakage rates increase significantly when multiple sheaths are inserted and the Gore LBIS demonstrates significantly lower leakage than both the Cook and Medtronic during procedures that require simultaneous, multiple insertions of smaller sheaths. Although the Gore Dryseal has by far the lowest leakage rate when 3 small diameter sheaths are inserted (just under 1 ml/s), depending on the duration of the procedure this could still result in significant blood loss.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño de Equipo , Factores de Tiempo , Modelos Cardiovasculares
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 99: 341-348, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852368

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonhome discharge (NHD) to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is uncommon. However, NHD after surgery has an important impact on patient quality of life and postdischarge outcomes. Understanding factors that put patients undergoing EVAR at high risk for NHD is essential to providing adequate preoperative counseling and shared decision making. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of NHD following elective EVAR and to create a clinically useful preoperative risk score. METHODS: Elective EVAR cases were queried from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative 2014-2018. A risk score was created by splitting the data set into two-thirds for development and one-third for validation. A parsimonious stepwise hierarchical multivariable logistic regression controlling for hospital level variation was performed in the development dataset, and the beta-coefficients were used to assign points for a risk score. The score was then validated, and model performance assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 24,426 patients were included and 932 (3.8%) required NHD. Multivariable analysis in the development group identified independent predictors of NHD, which were used to create a 20-point risk score. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based upon their risk score: low risk (0-7 points; n = 16,699) with an NHD rate of 1.8%, moderate risk (8-13 points; n = 7,315) with an NHD rate of 7.3%, and high risk (≥14 points; n = 412) with an NHD rate of 21.8%. The risk score had good predictive ability with c-statistic = 0.75 for model development and c-statistic = 0.73 in the validation dataset. CONCLUSIONS: This novel risk score can predict NHD following EVAR using characteristics that can be identified preoperatively. Utilization of this score may allow for improved risk assessment, preoperative counseling, and shared decision making.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Aneurisma de la Aorta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Cuidados Posteriores , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/etiología
17.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 362-372, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583764

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the presence of an aneurysmal or dissecting arterial disease was a risk factor of poor prognosis in patients presenting a dissection of the celiac trunk (CT). METHODS: All patients presenting a CT dissection between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2022, were included. Patients with a CT dissection due to the extension of an aortic dissection were excluded. Les antécédents familiaux de dissection, de maladie anévrysmale, de maladie athéromateuse ou du tissu conjonctif, la pratique d'une activité physique ou sportive, un effort inhabituel les jours précédant la dissection ainsi qu'un traumatisme étaient recherchés. Family history of dissection, aneurysmal disease, atheromatous or connective tissue disease, physical activity or sport, an unusual effort in the days prior to the dissection and trauma were sought after. Ischemic or aneurysmal complications in the acute phase and the evolution of the dissection were evaluated and compared between patients with an isolated dissection and those presenting an aneurysmal or dissecting arterial disease. RESULTS: 45 patients were included in the study. Twenty-three (51.1%) patients presented with symptomatic CT dissection, and 22 (48.9%) with asymptomatic CT dissection. All the patients initially had medical management alone. The mean follow-up was 32 ± 25 months and all patients were asymptomatic at the time last news. 24 (53.3%) presented an isolated CT dissection, and 21 (46.7%) a CT dissection associated with aneurysmal or dissecting arterial disease. There was no significant difference between patients with an isolated CT dissection and those with an associated dissecting or aneurysmal pathology. CONCLUSIONS: CT dissection is a stable disease in the midterm, which makes it a mild arterial pathology, with or without aneurysmal or dissecting anomalies in another territory. The mechanical stress exerted on the CT by the arcuate ligament could be responsible for parietal trauma and favor the occurrence of a CT dissection.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Arteria Celíaca , Humanos , Arteria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Celíaca/cirugía , Arteria Celíaca/fisiopatología , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto , Medición de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Pronóstico
18.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 104: 315-323, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Talos stent-graft has extended length to improve aortic remodeling, and distal porous design to decrease the rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI). This study retrospectively analyzed its mid-term outcomes for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection in a multicenter study. METHODS: The primary safety end point was 30-day major adverse events, including all-cause mortality, dissection-related mortality, conversion to open surgery, and device-related adverse events. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success at 12 months postoperation, defined as no technical failure or secondary dissection-related reintervention. The survival status of the patients was visualized using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Aortic growth was assessed at 4 levels, and SCI was evaluated at 12 months. RESULTS: 113 patients participated with a mean age of 54.4 (11.1) years and 71.7% (81/113) were male. The 30-day mortality was 0.9% (1/113), no conversions to open surgery or device-related adverse events were recorded. The 12-month treatment success rate was 99.1% (112/113), with no dissection-related reinterventions. There was no spinal cord or visceral ischemia at 12 months. At a median of 34 months follow-up, 9 further deaths were recorded and the 3-year survival rate was 91.7%. The percentage of aortic growth was 1.8% (2/111) at the tracheal bifurcation, 3.6% (4/111) below the left atrium, 6.0% (5/83) above the celiac artery, and 12.1% (9/74) below the lower renal artery. The total thrombosis rate of the false lumen at the stented segment was 80.5% (91/113). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed satisfactory results of Talos stent-graft in terms of safety and efficacy. More data are needed to confirm the long-term performance.


Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Porosidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Japón
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 90-98, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) success depends on imaging technology both in the planning and operative phases. Endovascular repair requires intravenous contrast and radiation exposure to the patient as well as radiation exposure to the operator. Recent developments in imaging technology attempt to merge preoperative imaging with intraoperative imaging to improve the efficiency and accuracy of EVAR. The Cydar 3-dimensional (3D) imaging system combines the preoperative and intraoperative imaging during the operation. We aim to investigate the use of the Cydar 3D imaging system during EVAR compared to conventional methods. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing an EVAR at a single quaternary vascular center from 2019-2023 was collected. This cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) repair using Cydar 3D imaging or (2) repair without Cydar 3D imaging. Overall, 138 unique patients were identified with 27 operations using Cydar 3D imaging and 111 operations without Cydar 3D imaging. We performed a 1-to-1 propensity score-matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching for variables including age, case urgency, and if the case was performed in the operative room or interventional radiology room. A match occurred when a patient in the Cydar 3D imaging group had an estimated score within 0.01 standard deviations of a patient in the control group. From this, we paired 27 from each cohort for a total of 54 patients. Demographic data included length of stay in days, contrast volume (mL), fluoroscopy time (min), procedure length (mins), mortality, and blood loss (mL). Univariate analyses were performed and a P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 54 vascular patients were analyzed: 27 without the Cydar 3D imaging and 27 with the Cydar 3D imaging. In the univariate analysis, there was no statistical difference in the average length of stay (6.4 days ± 11.76 vs. 4.1 ± 6.03, P = 0.372), aneurysm size (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 5.9 ± 1.2, P = 0.88), contrast volume in mL (91.3 ± 47.0 vs. 91.1-33.49, P = 9.88), fluoroscopy time in mins (20.2 ± 17.2 vs. 19.5 ± 19.4, P = 0.89), procedure length (299.3 ± 177.9 vs. 353 ± 191.98, P = 0.279), and blood loss in mL (513.8 ± 791 vs. 353 ± 191.98, P = 0.594). There was an increase in reintervention for endoleaks in the group with use of Cydar 3D imaging (0 vs. 6, P = 0.043). A subanalysis of patients undergoing physician-modified EVARs did show a 15% reduction in the contrast volume used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3D imaging technology has the potential to increase the safety of EVAR to both patients and operators. In our study, we did not find any difference in standard EVARs; however, there was a contrast use decrease in physician-modified EVARs. Further studies will need to be performed to determine the realized benefit from performing EVARs using this new technology.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Imagenología Tridimensional , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Aortografía , Factores de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 333-340, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815916

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To estimate whether the benefits of aortic aneurysm repair will outweigh the risks, determining individual risks is essential. This single-center prospective cohort study aimed to compare the association of functional tools with postoperative complications in older patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (≥65 years) who underwent aortic aneurysm repair were included. Four functional tools were administered: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); the 4-Meter Walk Test (4-MWT); handgrip strength; and the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI). Primary outcome was the association between all tests and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, the odds ratio for MoCA was 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.450; 3.157; P = 0.723), for 4-MWT 0.63 (95% CI 0.242; 1.650; P = 0.348), for GFI 1.82 (95% CI 0.783; 4.323, P = 0.162), and for weak handgrip strength 4.78 (95% CI 1.338; 17.096, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Weak handgrip strength is significantly associated with the development of postoperative complications after aortic aneurysm repair. This study strengthens the idea that implementing a quick screening tool for risk assessment at the outpatient clinic, such as handgrip strength, identifies patients who may benefit from preoperative enhancement with help from, for example, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, eventually leading to better outcomes for this patient group.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Evaluación Geriátrica , Fuerza de la Mano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/fisiopatología , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Estado Funcional , Prueba de Paso , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Cognición , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA