CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.

BACKGROUND: In the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), computed tomography (CT) is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA in the management of CAD to reduce the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing CT with ICA as initial diagnostic imaging strategies for guiding the treatment of patients with stable chest pain who had an intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD and were referred for ICA at one of 26 European centers. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) over 3.5 years. Key secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications and angina pectoris. RESULTS: Among 3561 patients (56.2% of whom were women), follow-up was complete for 3523 (98.9%). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 38 of 1808 patients (2.1%) in the CT group and in 52 of 1753 (3.0%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 1.07; P = 0.10). Major procedure-related complications occurred in 9 patients (0.5%) in the CT group and in 33 (1.9%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.55). Angina during the final 4 weeks of follow-up was reported in 8.8% of the patients in the CT group and in 7.5% of those in the ICA group (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred for ICA because of stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of CAD, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar in the CT group and the ICA group. The frequency of major procedure-related complications was lower with an initial CT strategy. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program and others; DISCHARGE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02400229.).

Is typical angina still prognostically important? The influence of "treatment bias" upon prognostic assessments.

BACKGROUND: Since typical angina has become less frequent, it is unclear if this symptom still has prognostic significance. METHODS: We evaluated 38,383 patients undergoing stress/rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging followed for a median of 10.9 years. After dividing patients by clinical symptoms, we evaluated the magnitude of myocardial ischemia and subsequent mortality among medically treated versus revascularized subgroups following testing. RESULTS: Patients with typical angina had more frequent and greater ischemia than other symptom groups, but not higher mortality. Among typical angina patients, those who underwent early revascularization had substantially greater ischemia than the medically treated subgroup, including a far higher proportion with severe ischemia (44.9% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001) and transient ischemic dilation of the LV (31.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the revascularized typical angina subgroup had a lower adjusted mortality risk than the medically treated subgroup (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.92, P = 0.009) CONCLUSIONS: Typical angina is associated with substantially more ischemia than other clinical symptoms. However, the high referral of patients with typical angina patients with ischemia to early revascularization resulted in this group having a lower rather than higher mortality risk versus other symptom groups. These findings illustrate the need to account for "treatment bias" among prognostic studies.

Association between inflammatory burden index and coronary slow flow phenomenon in patients with chest pain and no obstructive coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory burden index (IBI), a novel inflammation-based indicator, to is associated with the presence and prognosis of various diseases. However, few studies have focused on exploring the relationship between IBI and the coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP). In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of IBI for CSFP in patients with chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 1126 individuals with chest pain and no obstructive coronary arteries were consecutively included in this study. 71 patients developed CSFP were included in the CSFP group. A 1:2 age- and sex-matched patient with normal blood flow and angiographically proven normal coronary arteries was selected as the control group (n = 142). Plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were measured to determine the value of IBI. RESULTS: The IBI were significantly higher in the CSFP group than in the controls (21.1 ± 6.5 vs. 14.5 ± 6.4, P < 0.001). The IBI increasedelevated with the increase of the numbers of vessels affected by CSFP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that IBI and body mass index (BMI) were independent predictors of CSFP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that when IBI was > 15.74, the sensitivity and specificity were 77.5% and 67.6%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.799 (95% CI: 0.737-0.862, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The IBI may be an independent predictor of CSFP in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. The IBI could improve the predictive value of CSFP compared with the indicators alone.

The value of CCTA combined with machine learning for predicting angina pectoris in the anomalous origin of the right coronary artery.

BACKGROUND: Anomalous origin of coronary artery is a common coronary artery anatomy anomaly. The anomalous origin of the coronary artery may lead to problems such as narrowing of the coronary arteries at the beginning of the coronary arteries and abnormal alignment, which may lead to myocardial ischemia due to the compression of the coronary arteries. Clinical symptoms include chest tightness and dyspnea, with angina pectoris as a common symptom that can be life-threatening. Timely and accurate diagnosis of anomalous coronary artery origin is of great importance. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide detailed information on the characteristics of coronary arteries. Therefore, we combined CCTA and artificial intelligence (AI) technology to analyze the CCTA image features and clinical features of patients with anomalous origin of the right coronary artery to predict angina pectoris and the relevance of different features to angina pectoris. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we compiled data on 15 characteristics from 126 patients diagnosed with anomalous right coronary artery origins. The dataset encompassed both CCTA imaging attributes, such as the positioning of the right coronary artery orifices and the alignment of coronary arteries, and clinical parameters including gender and age. To identify the most salient features, we employed the Chi-square feature selection method, which filters features based on their statistical significance. We then focused on features yielding a Chi-square score exceeding a threshold of 1, thereby narrowing down the selection to seven key variables, including cardiac function and gender. Subsequently, we evaluated seven classifiers known for their efficacy in classification tasks. Through rigorous training and testing, we conducted a comparative analysis to identify the top three classifiers with the highest accuracy rates. RESULTS: The top three classifiers in this study are Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Learning (EL), and Kernel Approximation Classifier. Among the SVM, EL and Kernel Approximation Classifier-based classifiers, the best performance is achieved for linear SVM, optimizable Ensembles Learning and SVM kernel, respectively. And the corresponding accuracy is 75.7%, 75.7%, and 73.0%, respectively. The AUC values are 0.77, 0.80, and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning (ML) models can predict angina pectoris caused by the origin anomalous of the right coronary artery, providing valuable auxiliary diagnostic information for clinicians and serving as a warning to clinicians. It is hoped that timely intervention and treatment can be realized to avoid serious consequences such as myocardial infarction.

Decline in typical angina among patients referred for cardiac stress testing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporal trends in the prevalence of typical angina and its clinical correlates among patients referred for stress/rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of chest pain symptoms and their relationship to inducible myocardial ischemia among 61,717 patients undergoing stress/rest SPECT-MPI between January 2, 1991 and December 31, 2017. We also assessed the relationship between chest pain symptom and angiographic findings among 6,579 patients undergoing coronary CT angiography between 2011 and 2017. RESULTS: The prevalence of typical angina among SPECT-MPI patients declined from 16.2% between 1991 and 1997 to 3.1% between 2011 and 2017, while the prevalence of dyspnea without any chest pain increased from 5.9 to 14.5% over the same period. The frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia declined over time within all symptom groups, but its frequency among current patients (2011-2017) with typical angina was approximately three-fold higher versus other symptom groups (28.4% versus 8.6%, p < 0.001). Overall, patients with typical angina had a higher prevalence of obstructive CAD on CCTA than those with other clinical symptoms, but 33.3% of typical angina patients had no coronary stenoses, 31.1% had 1-49% stenoses, and 35.4% had ≥ 50% stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of typical angina has declined to a very low level among contemporary patients referred for noninvasive cardiac tests. The angiographic findings among current typical angina patients are now quite heterogeneous, with one-third of such patients having normal coronary angiograms. However, typical angina remains associated with a substantially higher frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia compared to patients with other cardiac symptoms.

Long-term improvement of symptoms of angina pectoris after successful revascularization of coronary artery chronic total occlusions.

Objectives. To compare long-term angina pectoris relief of successful versus failed percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions (CTO PCI). Background. Previous studies demonstrate better short-term angina pectoris relief of CTO PCI than with optimal medical treatment (OMT), however, data on the long-term effects are lacking. Methods. 295 patients undergoing CTO PCI were analyzed retrospectively, with a follow-up evaluation of symptoms of angina pectoris and all-cause death one to four years after the intervention. The primary outcome was long-term relief of symptoms of angina pectoris. Secondary outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and later target vessel revascularization (TVR). At follow-up, patients were interviewed for symptoms of angina pectoris at 1, 6, 12, and 22 to 48 months after the intervention. Results. CTO PCI was successful in 225 (76%) patients and failed in 70 (24%) patients. Short-term (six months) relief of angina pectoris was observed in both groups, but only the successful CTO PCI group showed long-term relief. The Kaplan-Meier curves of all-cause death did not differ between the groups (p = .715). The final follow-up was a mean (range) of 37 (25 to 44) months after the intervention in the successful CTO PCI group, and 33 (28 to 48) months in the failed CTO PCI group. Conclusions. Successful CTO PCI is associated with better long-term relief of symptoms of angina pectoris compared to failed CTO PCI.

The prevalence and predictors of inducible myocardial ischemia among patients referred for radionuclide stress testing.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia has declined in contemporary stress test cohorts, suggesting a need to re-evaluate its optimal use. To-date, however, a comprehensive analysis of the most potent predictors of myocardial ischemia among cardiac stress test patients has not been conducted. METHODS: We assessed 27,615 patients referred for stress-rest SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2017. Chi-square analysis was used to ascertain the most potent predictors of ischemia. RESULTS: Among our cohort, CAD status (presence/absence of known CAD), rest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and typical angina were the most potent predictors of ischemia. The frequency of ischemia was only 6.6% among patients with an LVEF > 55% but 38.1% for patients with LVEF < 45% (P < 0.001). The frequency of myocardial ischemia was fourfold higher among patients with known CAD vs no known CAD (28.0% vs 6.5%, P < 0.001) and approximately threefold higher among patients with typical angina vs patients with atypical symptoms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of myocardial ischemia varies markedly according to the common clinical parameters and is particularly high among patients with known CAD, low LVEF, and typical angina. These observations may be used to develop more cost-effective strategies for referring patients for cardiac stress testing.

Eisenmenger syndrome with left main compression syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Left main coronary artery disease secondary to pulmonary artery compression related to Eisenmenger syndrome is an under-suspected condition that can cause fatal outcomes if left untreated. It presents with typical angina but is frequently mistaken for pulmonary hypertension (PH) symptoms. It is now recognized as one of the few important causes of angina in PH. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old man with a history of unoperated atrial septal defect and Eisenmenger syndrome came to the outpatient department with a chief complaint of angina on exertion. Electrocardiogram showed regular sinus rhythm with right axis deviation, right ventricular hypertrophy, deep T-wave inversion in inferior and anterior leads suggestive of ischemia or strain, and incomplete right bundle branch block. Cardiac CT showed compression of the left main coronary artery due to a dilated main pulmonary artery. Therefore, this patient was diagnosed with Eisenmenger syndrome with left main compression due to dilated pulmonary artery. He was treated successfully with IVUS-guided stent implantation. The patient experienced marked improvement in regular activities, with no recurrence of angina symptoms. Angiography 3 months after the procedure revealed good patency of the stent, without significant stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Left main coronary artery compression is a complication that should be suspected in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome presenting with angina symptoms. Non-invasive modalities are recommended for diagnostic evaluation, but the gold-standard technique remains coronary angiography. The best treatment is not well-established, with either myocardial revascularization or PH treatment, but a left main coronary artery stenting procedure is considered an ideal emergent treatment to provide a better quality of life for patients in this condition.

Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with chest pain and normal epicardial coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: To detect ischemia in patients with angina and normal coronaries frequently represents a complex diagnosis. METHODS: To investigate whether left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis contributes in the evaluation of patients with chest pain and normal coronaries, gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) at rest and 30 minutes post-stress was performed in 218 patients with normal epicardial coronaries, who were divided into two groups: those with summed difference score (SDS) ≥ 4 (54 patients, Group 1), and those with SDS < 4 (164 patients, Group 2). Intraventricular synchronism-phase standard deviation (PSD) and histogram bandwidth (HBW)-was evaluated by phase analysis. RESULTS: Women were significantly more frequent in Group 2 (those without ischemia in SPECT MPI): 113 (69%) vs 25 (46%), P = .00001. In males, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricular volumes were not significantly different between patients with or without ischemia. However, ischemic females showed significantly higher ventricular volumes, minor post-stress LVEF and more negative delta LVEF (- 3.9 vs 0.34, P = .0008) than the non-ischemic ones. There was a significant post-stress increase of PSD and HBW among males, although not among females. According to SSS (≥ 4, with ischemia/necrosis; < 4, without ischemia/necrosis), post-stress PSD and HBW significantly increase both in male and female, and PSD and HBW were significantly higher in females with SSS ≥ 4 compared to those with SSS < 4 (PSD rest: 19.04° vs 11.72°, P < .0001; HBW rest: 58.85° vs 38.21°, P < .0001). PSD and HBW were also higher among males with SSS ≥ 4 compared to those with SSS < 4, although not significantly. CONCLUSION: Higher ventricular volumes in females and dyssynchrony are associated with inducible ischemia in MPI in patients with chest pain and normal coronaries. Stress-induced ischemia increases degree of dyssynchrony.

Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI.

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2492 patients with coronary artery disease, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either iFR-guided or FFR-guided coronary revascularization. The primary end point was the 1-year risk of major adverse cardiac events, which were a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The trial was designed to show the noninferiority of iFR to FFR, with a margin of 3.4 percentage points for the difference in risk. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary end point had occurred in 78 of 1148 patients (6.8%) in the iFR group and in 83 of 1182 patients (7.0%) in the FFR group (difference in risk, -0.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3 to 1.8; P<0.001 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.33; P=0.78). The risk of each component of the primary end point and of death from cardiovascular or noncardiovascular causes did not differ significantly between the groups. The number of patients who had adverse procedural symptoms and clinical signs was significantly lower in the iFR group than in the FFR group (39 patients [3.1%] vs. 385 patients [30.8%], P<0.001), and the median procedural time was significantly shorter (40.5 minutes vs. 45.0 minutes, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization guided by iFR was noninferior to revascularization guided by FFR with respect to the risk of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. The rate of adverse procedural signs and symptoms was lower and the procedural time was shorter with iFR than with FFR. (Funded by Philips Volcano; DEFINE-FLAIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02053038 .).

Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI.

BACKGROUND: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is an index used to assess the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. The index has been tested against fractional flow reserve (FFR) in small trials, and the two measures have been found to have similar diagnostic accuracy. However, studies of clinical outcomes associated with the use of iFR are lacking. We aimed to evaluate whether iFR is noninferior to FFR with respect to the rate of subsequent major adverse cardiac events. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial using the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry for enrollment. A total of 2037 participants with stable angina or an acute coronary syndrome who had an indication for physiologically guided assessment of coronary-artery stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo revascularization guided by either iFR or FFR. The primary end point was the rate of a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization within 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: A primary end-point event occurred in 68 of 1012 patients (6.7%) in the iFR group and in 61 of 1007 (6.1%) in the FFR group (difference in event rates, 0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.5 to 2.8; P=0.007 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.58; P=0.53); the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in event rates fell within the prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.2 percentage points. The results were similar among major subgroups. The rates of myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis did not differ significantly between the two groups. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the FFR group than in the iFR group reported chest discomfort during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable angina or an acute coronary syndrome, an iFR-guided revascularization strategy was noninferior to an FFR-guided revascularization strategy with respect to the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months. (Funded by Philips Volcano; iFR SWEDEHEART ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02166736 .).

Coronary sinus reducer implantation in the middle cardiac vein for the treatment of refractory angina.

Coronary sinus Reducer is a current therapeutic treatment for patients with persistent refractory angina. We report a case of successful implantation of the device in the middle cardiac vein of a 65 years old female patient. The singular and unusual site for the Reducer was planned after a careful assessment of the venous drainage of the ischemic territory.

The impact of the coronary sinus reducer upon left ventricular function in patients with refractory angina pectoris.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation upon left ventricular (LV) function. BACKGROUND: CS Reducer implantation is associated with symptomatic relief in patients with refractory angina. The effects of the device upon left ventricular function remains unknown. METHODS: Prior to device implantation and at 4-months, resting ventricular volumes and function were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Stress CMR was performed to extract quantitative indices of myocardial perfusion (myocardial perfusion reserve index-MPRI). RESULTS: Nineteen patients (18 males, 66.0 [IQR 56.0-77.0] years), underwent successful Reducer implantation. Sixteen (84%) patients improved by at least 1 CCS class. Four months after Reducer implantation, we noticed a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (61 [IQR 47-71] to 66 [IQR 57-72] %; p = .009), a reduction in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)/Body surface area (BSA) (65.7 [IQR 57.4-89.6] to 64.7 [IQR 53.7-74.1] mL/m2 ; p = .036) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)/BSA (28.7 [IQR 18.6-38.8] to 20.0 [IQR 15.0-31.4] mL/m2 ; p = .007). Patients with reduced EF (EF < 50%, n = 6) presented a greater increase of EF at follow up compared to patients with preserved EF (11.3 [IQR 6.5-54.5] vs. 3.8 [IQR 0.6-9.1] %; p = .029). The observed decrease in LVESV/BSA was greater in patients with reduced EF (23.6 [IQR 11.6-33.8] vs. 4.2 [IQR -2.0 to 8.4] mL/m2 ; p = .005). A significant increase in transmural MPRI was observed 4 months after Reducer implantation (p < .011). CONCLUSIONS: CS Reducer improved angina symptoms and improved left ventricular function. The improvement was pronounced in the subgroup of patients with reduced ejection fraction. Myocardial perfusion improvement could represent the underlying mechanism for the observed benefits.

Implantation of a Coronary Sinus Reducer to Treat Refractory Angina in a 38-Year-Old with an Anomalous Left Coronary Artery and No Revascularization Options.

A 38-year-old female with anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery presented with refractory angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] class 4). Having failed two previous internal mammary artery grafts to the left anterior descending artery and with no percutaneous revascularization options, she underwent coronary sinus reducer implantation, which improved her symptoms (CCS 0), quality of life, and corresponded to an improvement in ischemia on myocardial perfusion scanning. This case report describes an unusual case of refractory angina in the context of congenital heart disease, illustrates the benefit of this novel hourglass-shaped stent in improving ischemia, quality of life, depression and anxiety, and highlights the importance of managing these patients in multidisciplinary teams.

Acute Myocardial Infarction Caused by Coronary Spasm and Dissection Treated with Medical Therapy.

We report the case of a 33-year-old woman with no history of coronary risk factors or chest pain who experienced intermittent chest pain at rest for several minutes from 2 PM. At 8 AM the next day, chest pain recurred and persisted for about 1 hour. She was transported to our hospital by ambulance, where electrocardiogram showed ST-elevation in the precordial leads, and blood tests showed elevation of cardiac markers. She was diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Because she was a young woman without any risk factors, coronary spastic angina was suspected. Coronary angiography without intracoronary nitrate administration revealed diffuse 75% stenosis in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and diffuse 90% stenosis in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). A coronary spasm provocation test elicited chest pain; coronary angiography showed 99% diffuse stenosis of LAD; and electrocardiogram showed precordial ST-segment elevation. Although intracoronary nitroglycerin injection attenuated the coronary spasm in the RCA and proximal LAD, 90% stenosis and coronary dissection were observed in the midportion of the LAD. When the imaging test that was carried out before the provocation test was reexamined, the dissection was recognized, and there was no clear dissection progress after the test. Intravascular ultrasound showed dissection of the LAD, as did angiography. We treated the patient using medical therapy instead of percutaneous coronary intervention.The patient did not suffer any anginal attack and improved sufficiently to be discharged. She remained free of attacks for about 10 years to the present time, and follow-up is continuing.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with poor glycemic control amongst female diabetics with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to those without diabetes. The timing, relative to disease onset, and degree of glycemic control that reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events remains uncertain. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and is linked to adverse cardiovascular events. We assessed the association between endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent coronary microvascular dysfunction and glycemic control in patients presenting with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary disease at angiography. METHODS: Patients presenting with chest pain and found to have non-obstructive CAD (stenosis < 40%) at angiography underwent an invasive assessment of endothelial-independent and endothelial -dependent microvascular function. Endothelial-independent microvascular function was assessed by comparing the coronary flow velocity, measured using a Doppler guidewire, in response to intracoronary infusion of adenosine to calculate the coronary flow reserve ratio in response to adenosine (CFRAdn Ratio). A CFRAdn Ratio ≤ 2.5 was considered abnormal. Endothelial-dependent microvascular function was assessed by measuring the percent change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCBFAch), and microvascular endothelial dysfunction defined as a %ΔCBFAch of ≤ 50%. Patients were classified by normal versus abnormal CFRAdn Ratio and %ΔCBFAch. Measurements of HbA1c and fasting serum glucose were obtained prior to catheterization and compared between groups. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 2012, 1469 patients (mean age 50.4 years, 35% male) underwent coronary angiography and invasive testing for coronary microvascular dysfunction, of which 129 (8.8%) had type 2 diabetes. Fifty-one (39.5%) had an abnormal %ΔCBFAch and 49 (38.0%) had an abnormal CFRAdn Ratio. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular or diabetic medication use did not vary significantly between groups. Females with an abnormal CFRAdn Ratio or abnormal %ΔCBFAch had a significantly higher HbA1c compared to patients with a normal CFRAdn Ratio or %ΔCBFAch respectively: HbA1c % (standard deviation) 7.4 (2.1) vs. 6.5 (1.1), p = 0.035 and 7.3 (1.9) vs. 6.4 (1.2), p = 0.022, respectively. Female patients with an abnormal CFRAdn Ratio had significantly higher fasting serum glucose concentrations compared to those with a normal CFRAdn Ratio: fasting serum glucose mg/dL (standard deviation) 144.4 (55.6) vs. 121.9 (28.1), p = 0.035. This was not observed in men. Amongst female diabetics, a higher HbA1c was significantly associated with any coronary microvascular dysfunction both in a univariate and multivariate analysis: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.69 (1.01-2.86) p = 0.049; and a fasting serum glucose > 140 mg/dL was significantly associated with an abnormal CFRAdn Ratio, 4.28 (1.43-12.81). CONCLUSION: Poor glycemic control is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction amongst female diabetics presenting with chest pain and non-obstructive CAD. These findings highlight the importance of sex specific risk stratification models and treatment strategies when managing cardiovascular risk amongst diabetics. Further studies are required to identify additional risk prevention tools and therapies targeting microvascular dysfunction as an integrated index of cardiovascular risk.

Evaluation of acute chest pain: Evolving paradigm of coronary risk scores and imaging.

There is a broad differential diagnosis for patients presenting with acute chest pain. History, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and serial troponin assays are pivotal in assessing patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, if the initial workup is equivocal, physicians are faced with a challenge to find the optimal strategy for further triage. Risk stratification scores have been validated for patients with known acute coronary syndrome, such as the TIMI and GRACE scores, but there may be limitations in undifferentiated chest pain patients. Advancements in imaging modalities such as coronary computed tomography angiography and the addition CT derived fractional flow reserve, have demonstrated utility in evaluating patients presenting with acute chest pain. With this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the non-invasive modalities that are available to evaluate acute chest pain patients suspected of cardiac etiology in the emergency room. We also added a focus on new imaging modalities that have shown to have prognostic implications in stable ischemic heart disease.

Percutaneous management of periprocedural coronary sinus Reducer migration.

Coronary sinus Reducer represents a novel therapeutic option for refractory angina. As emerging evidence of both reduction in angina symptoms and reduction of myocardial ischemia burden might lead to increased Reducer implantations, knowledge on how to manage potential complications is of clinical importance. We report a successful management of scaffold migration in right atrium.

Incomplete coronary sinus reducer endothelialization as potential mechanism of clinical failure.

The number of patients suffering from refractory angina is constantly increasing. Moreover, these patients are considered at higher risk for new hospitalizations and increased incidence of adverse cardiac events. The coronary sinus reducer was recently introduced as a new therapeutic option in patients with refractory angina and no possibilities for coronary revascularization. However, a consistent percentage of patients, ranging from 15 to 30%, reports no clinical benefits after coronary sinus reducer implantation. The reasons for this lack of effectiveness are at present unknown. We suggest here a possible explanation to this phenomenon.