Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 338
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(4): 299-309, 2023 01 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720132

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) restores perfusion and oxygenation in a patient who does not have spontaneous circulation. The evidence with regard to the effect of extracorporeal CPR on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is inconclusive. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in the Netherlands, we assigned patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive extracorporeal CPR or conventional CPR (standard advanced cardiac life support). Eligible patients were between 18 and 70 years of age, had received bystander CPR, had an initial ventricular arrhythmia, and did not have a return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes after CPR had been initiated. The primary outcome was survival with a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 30 days. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients who underwent randomization, 70 were assigned to receive extracorporeal CPR and 64 to receive conventional CPR; 26 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria at hospital admission were excluded. At 30 days, 14 patients (20%) in the extracorporeal-CPR group were alive with a favorable neurologic outcome, as compared with 10 patients (16%) in the conventional-CPR group (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.5; P = 0.52). The number of serious adverse events per patient was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR had similar effects on survival with a favorable neurologic outcome. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and Maquet Cardiopulmonary [Getinge]; INCEPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03101787.).


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Hospitalización , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Países Bajos
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 82: 94-100, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848664

RESUMEN

AIM: In cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occurring at home, Japanese emergency medical services personnel decide whether to provide treatment on the scene or during transport based on their judgment. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of advanced life support (ALS) (i.e., endotracheal intubation [ETI] or adrenaline administration) for OHCA at home and prognosis. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Utstein Registry and emergency transport data collected from patients who underwent pre-hospital ETI (n = 6806) and received adrenaline (n = 22,636) between 2016 and 2019. The timing of ETI or adrenaline administration was determined as "on the scene" or "in the ambulance." Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association among the timing of ALS implementation, pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival at 1 month. RESULT: ETI on the scene was significantly positively associated with pre-hospital ROSC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-2.09) and survival at 1 month (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.47-2.23). Adrenaline administration on the scene was significantly positively associated with pre-hospital ROSC (AOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.33-2.70) and survival at 1 month (AOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.89-2.40). CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests performing ALS on the scene was associated with pre-hospital ROSC and survival at 1 month. Further efforts are needed to increase the rate of ALS implementation on the scene by emergency life-saving technicians.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Epinefrina , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Retorno de la Circulación Espontánea , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e55037, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648098

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT is the most advanced large language model to date, with prior iterations having passed medical licensing examinations, providing clinical decision support, and improved diagnostics. Although limited, past studies of ChatGPT's performance found that artificial intelligence could pass the American Heart Association's advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) examinations with modifications. ChatGPT's accuracy has not been studied in more complex clinical scenarios. As heart disease and cardiac arrest remain leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States, finding technologies that help increase adherence to ACLS algorithms, which improves survival outcomes, is critical. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the accuracy of ChatGPT in following ACLS guidelines for bradycardia and cardiac arrest. METHODS: We evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses to 2 simulations based on the 2020 American Heart Association ACLS guidelines with 3 primary outcomes of interest: the mean individual step accuracy, the accuracy score per simulation attempt, and the accuracy score for each algorithm. For each simulation step, ChatGPT was scored for correctness (1 point) or incorrectness (0 points). Each simulation was conducted 20 times. RESULTS: ChatGPT's median accuracy for each step was 85% (IQR 40%-100%) for cardiac arrest and 30% (IQR 13%-81%) for bradycardia. ChatGPT's median accuracy over 20 simulation attempts for cardiac arrest was 69% (IQR 67%-74%) and for bradycardia was 42% (IQR 33%-50%). We found that ChatGPT's outputs varied despite consistent input, the same actions were persistently missed, repetitive overemphasis hindered guidance, and erroneous medication information was presented. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for consistent and reliable guidance to prevent potential medical errors and optimize the application of ChatGPT to enhance its reliability and effectiveness in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado , American Heart Association , Bradicardia , Paro Cardíaco , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Estados Unidos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Algoritmos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
4.
Lancet ; 396(10265): 1807-1816, 2020 12 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197396

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565. FINDINGS: Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed. INTERPRETATION: Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment. FUNDING: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Reperfusión/métodos , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Adulto , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/normas , Anciano , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Seguridad , Sobrevida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 486-491, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As advanced life support (ALS) provided by emergency medical services (EMS) on scene becomes more common, the scene time interval (STI) for which EMS providers stay on scene tends to lengthen. We investigated the relationship between the STI and neurological outcome of patients at hospital discharge when ALS was provided by EMS on scene. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) data between August 2015 and December 2018. A restricted cubic spline curve was used to investigate the relationship between the STI and neurologic outcome, and patients were divided into two groups based on the cut-off value obtained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Comparisons of outcomes between the two groups were performed before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: 4548 patients were included in the analysis. In ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value for STI was 19 min. For the group with an STI <19 min, survival admission, survival discharge, and good neurologic outcome at hospital discharge were all higher than for the group with STI ≥19 min before and after propensity score matching. The multivariable model also showed that the STI ≥19 min was significantly associated with poor neurologic outcome at hospital discharge compared with the STI <19 min (adjusted odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.40-2.88). CONCLUSIONS: A duration of on-scene ALS more than 19 min was associated with a poor neurologic outcome of patients at hospital discharge in OHCA.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Anciano , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 39: 168-172, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33162264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is recommended in contemporary educational efforts by the American Heart Association (AHA) as central to adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS). However, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2019 recommendations update describes large evidentiary gaps for epinephrine use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, highlighting that clinical and experimental evidence do not support the current AHA recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This controversies article was written as a response to updated AHA and ILCOR adult ACLS recommendations in late 2019. This report summarizes and evaluates the evidence surrounding epinephrine for cardiac arrest with a focus on the historical perspective of epinephrine research. DISCUSSION: According to the 2019 AHA ACLS guidelines, epinephrine is an integral component of adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Epinephrine improves rates of return of spontaneous circulation and might provide benefit at different doses or in select resuscitation scenarios, such asystole as an initial rhythm at onset of resuscitation efforts. However, evidence indicates potential harms with routine use of standard dose epinephrine (1 mg/10 mL), with no improvement in neurologic or long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite years of use and inclusion in resuscitation guidelines, epinephrine is not associated with improved neurologic outcomes. The AHA Emergency Cardiovascular Care committee should revise ACLS guidelines reflecting evidence that standard-dose epinephrine offers little benefit to successful patient recovery including neurologic outcomes. Future resuscitation guidelines should reflect this important consideration.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Paro Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/normas , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/tendencias , Investigación Biomédica , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 43: 62-68, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33529851

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound protocols are commonly used for the initial management of patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department (ED). However, there is little published evidence regarding any mortality benefit. We compared and studied the effect of implementation of the modified SESAME protocol in terms of clinical outcomes and resuscitation management. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. We conducted a pre- and post-intervention study to evaluate changes in patient outcomes and management after educating emergency medicine residents and the faculty about the modified SESAME protocol. The pre-intervention period lasted from March 2018 to February 2019, and the post-intervention period lasted from May 2019 to April 2020. The modified SESAME protocol education was initiated in March 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between independent variables and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included in this study during a 24-month period. We found no significant differences between the two groups for the primary outcome of survival to hospital admission (pre-intervention group 28.9% versus post-intervention group 28.6%; P = 0.751), survival to hospital discharge (12.1% vs. 12.4%; P = 0.806), and good neurologic outcome at discharge (6.0% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.509). The proportion of resuscitation procedures of thrombolysis, emergency transfusion, tube thoracotomy, and pericardiocentesis during resuscitation increased from 0.6% in the pre-intervention period to 4.9% in the post-intervention period (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: We did not discover any significant survival benefits associated with the implementation of the modified SESAME protocol; however, early diagnosis of specific pathologies (pericardial effusion, possible pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, and hypovolemia) and accordingly a direct increase in the resuscitation management were seen in this study. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to examine the clinical outcomes as well as to identify the most effective POC ultrasonography protocols for non-traumatic cardiac arrests.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/normas , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/educación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 42: 161-167, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111405

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The time dependence of a multi-tier response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent effect of EMS response type in a multi-tiered system on the clinical outcomes of OHCA. METHODS: Adult EMS-treated OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology who were not witnessed by EMS between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The main exposure was EMS response type: single-tier response, early multi-tier response (0-18 min from call to second EMS arrival), and late multi-tier response (19 min from call to second EMS arrival). The primary outcome was good neurologic recovery at the time of discharge from the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for patient-community and prehospital variables. RESULTS: Among 54,436 patients, 29,995 patients (55.1%), 21,552 patients (39.6%), and 2889 patients (5.3%) were treated by single-tiered EMS, early multi-tiered EMS, and late multi-tiered EMS, respectively. Good neurological recovery and survival to discharge were more frequent in the early multi-tiered response group (6.4% and 9.7%) than in the single-tiered response group (4.8% and 7.5%) or late multi-tiered response group (3.1% and 5.8%). Compared to the single-tiered response group, the early multi-tiered response group was more likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 1.15 [1.06-1.26]), but the late multi-tiered response group was less likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.76 [0.61-0.96]). CONCLUSION: In our basic to intermediate-tiered EMS system, early multi-tier response was associated with improved survival and good neurological recovery.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/prevención & control , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Análisis de Supervivencia
11.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(4): 585-589, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30001817

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival to discharge between nursing home (NH) cardiac arrest patients receiving smartphone-based advanced cardiac life support (SALS) and basic life support (BLS). METHODS: The SALS registry includes data on cardiac arrest from 7 urban and suburban areas in Korea between July 2015 and December 2016. We include adult patients (>18) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of medical causes and EMS attended and dispatched in. SALS is an advanced field resuscitation including drug administration by paramedics with video communication-based direct medical direction. Prehospital resuscitation method was key exposure (SALS, BLS). The primary outcome was survival to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 616 consecutive out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation cases in NHs were recorded, and 199 (32.3%) underwent SALS. Among the NH arrest patients, the survival discharge rate was a little higher in the SALS group than the BLS group (4.0% vs 1.7%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.078). Survival discharge with good neurologic outcome rates was 0.5% in the SALS group and 1.0% in the BLS group (P = 0.119). On the other hand, in the non-NH group, all outcome measures significantly improved when SALS was performed compared to BLS alone (survival discharge rate: 10.0% vs 7.3%, P = 0.001; good neurologic outcome: 6.8% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of providing prehospital ACLS with direct medical intervention through remote video calls to paramedics, the survival to discharge rate and that with good neurologic outcome (CPC 1, 2) of non-NH patients significantly improved, however those of NH patients were not significantly increased.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/mortalidad , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Teléfono Inteligente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Casas de Salud , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Sistema de Registros , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 20(15)2019 Aug 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31387264

RESUMEN

Cardiovascular disease is the largest contributor to worldwide mortality, and the deleterious impact of heart failure (HF) is projected to grow exponentially in the future. As heart transplantation (HTx) is the only effective treatment for end-stage HF, development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology has unveiled additional therapeutic options for refractory cardiac disease. Unfortunately, despite both MCS and HTx being quintessential treatments for significant cardiac impairment, associated morbidity and mortality remain high. MCS technology continues to evolve, but is associated with numerous disturbances to cardiac function (e.g., oxidative damage, arrhythmias). Following MCS intervention, HTx is frequently the destination option for survival of critically ill cardiac patients. While effective, donor hearts are scarce, thus limiting HTx to few qualifying patients, and HTx remains correlated with substantial post-HTx complications. While MCS and HTx are vital to survival of critically ill cardiac patients, cardioprotective strategies to improve outcomes from these treatments are highly desirable. Accordingly, this review summarizes the current status of MCS and HTx in the clinic, and the associated cardiac complications inherent to these treatments. Furthermore, we detail current research being undertaken to improve cardiac outcomes following MCS/HTx, and important considerations for reducing the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these necessary treatment strategies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Cardiopatías/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/prevención & control , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Animales , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/etiología , Cardiopatías/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos
19.
Air Med J ; 38(3): 147-149, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122576

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The prevailing standard of care in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) is that either intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) access is an acceptable route for obtaining vascular access and delivery of resuscitation medications and volume expanders in cardiac arrest patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of IV access versus IO access in terms of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for patients suffering from cardiac arrest. METHODS: A retrospective chart review examining cardiac arrest data with a single advanced life support EMS agency over a 4-year period was performed. Cardiac arrest patients were identified from a quality assurance database. Exclusion criteria included trauma arrest, pediatrics, pregnancy, and obvious signs of death. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria. A total of 183 (45.1%) out of 406 cardiac arrest patients achieved ROSC who had an IV placed. A total of 389 cardiac arrest patients had an IO placed with ROSC in 100 (25.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Higher ROSC rates were achieved with IV access versus IO access. Limitations include the small sample size, a single EMS agency, and the retrospective nature of the study. Future studies should further evaluate the effectiveness of IO versus IV access in cardiac arrest and other low perfusion states.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intravenosa , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Infusiones Intraóseas , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intraóseas/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Artif Organs ; 42(1): 31-40, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28741841

RESUMEN

Right ventricular failure is a common complication associated with rotary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Currently, there is no clinically approved long-term rotary right ventricular assist device (RVAD). Instead, clinicians have implanted a second rotary LVAD as RVAD in biventricular support. To prevent pulmonary hypertension, the RVAD must be operated by either reducing pump speed or banding the outflow graft. These modes differ in hydraulic performance, which may affect the pulmonary valve opening (PVO) and subsequently cause fusion, valvular insufficiency, and thrombus formation. This study aimed to compare PVO with the RVAD operated at reduced speed or with a banded outflow graft. Baseline conditions of systemic normal, hypo, and hypertension with severe biventricular failure were simulated in a mock circulation loop. Biventricular support was provided with two rotary VentrAssist LVADs with cardiac output restored to 5 L/min in banded outflow and reduced speed conditions, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances (PVR) were manipulated to determine the range of conditions that allowed PVO without causing left ventricular suction. Finally, RVAD sine wave speed modulation (±550 rpm) strategies (co- and counter-pulsation) were implemented to observe the effect on PVO. For each condition, outflow banding had higher PVR (97 ± 20 dyne/s/cm5 higher) for when the pulmonary valve closed compared to reduced speed. In addition, counter-pulsation demonstrated greater PVO than co-pulsation and constant speed. For the purpose of reducing the risks of pulmonary valve insufficiency, fusion, and thrombotic event, this study recommends a RVAD with a steeper H-Q gradient by banding and further exploration of RVAD speed modulation.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/efectos adversos , Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Arteria Pulmonar/trasplante , Válvula Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Válvula Pulmonar/cirugía , Resistencia Vascular , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA