A dental workforce strategy to make Australian public dental services more efficient.

BACKGROUND: Dental services can be provided by the oral health therapy (OHT) workforce and dentists. This study aims to quantify the potential cost-savings of increased utilisation of the OHT workforce in providing dental services for children under the Child Dental Benefits Schedule (CDBS). The CDBS is an Australian federal government initiative to increase dental care access for children aged 2-17 years. METHODS: Dental services billed under the CDBS for the 2013-2014 financial year were used. Two OHT-to-dentist workforce mix ratios were tested: Model A National Workforce (1:4) and Model B Victorian Workforce (2:3). The 30% average salary difference between the two professions in the public sector was used to adjust the CDBS fee schedule for each type of service. The current 29% utilisation rate of the CDBS and the government target of 80% were modelled. RESULTS: The estimated cost-savings under the current CDBS utilisation rate was AUD 26.5M and AUD 61.7M, for Models A and B, respectively. For the government target CDBS utilisation rate, AUD 73.2M for Model A and AUD 170.2M for Model B could be saved. CONCLUSION: An increased utilisation of the OHT workforce to provide dental services under the CDBS would save costs on public dental service funding. The potential cost-savings can be reinvested in other dental initiatives such as outreach school-based dental check programmes or resource allocation to eliminate adult dental waiting lists in the public sector.

A Workforce Strategy for Reducing Oral Health Disparities: Dental Therapists.

This article seeks to chronicle how dental therapists are being used to bolster the supply of providers for the underserved and explore their potential to diversify the field of dentistry and improve public health. Of the factors that contribute to persistent oral health disparities in the United States, an insufficient oral health workforce figures prominently. A growing number of states are authorizing a midlevel dental provider (often called a dental therapist) to address this problem. Dental therapists work under the supervision of dentists to deliver routine preventive and restorative care, including preparing and filling cavities and performing extractions. They can serve all populations in 3 states, are caring for Native Americans in an additional 3 states under federal or state authority, and are being considered in about a dozen state houses.

Indian Country Leads National Movement to Knock Down Barriers to Oral Health Equity.

Tribal and other underserved communities are struggling under the weight of devastating oral health disparities. Tribes as sovereign nations are searching for innovative solutions to address their unique barriers to oral health care. Dental therapists are primary oral health providers who work as part of the dental team to provide a limited scope of services to patients. They were first brought to tribal communities by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. Despite strong opposition from the American Dental Association aimed at protecting its monopoly on oral health care, dental therapists are sweeping the nation. Evidence shows that they are effective and provide high-quality care, particularly in underserved communities. A community's ability to develop public health policy solutions tailored to its needs and priorities is essential in eliminating health disparities and achieving health equity. The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community is leading the way to more effective and efficient dental teams and working hard to lay the groundwork for the elimination of oral health disparities.

Lack of high-quality studies comparing the effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, of dental auxiliaries and dentists in performing dental care.

DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group's Specialised Register; Cochrane Oral Health Group's Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Medline; Embase; CINAHL; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness; five other databases and two trial registries. A number of dental journals were hand-searched and a grey literature search preformed. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before and after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITSs) were considered. Selection was conducted independently by two reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not possible so a narrative summary was presented. RESULTS: Four studies evaluated sealant placement; three found no evidence of a difference in retention rates of those placed by dental auxiliaries and dentists over a range of follow-up periods (six to 24 months). One study found that sealants placed by a dental auxiliary had lower retention rates than ones placed by a dentist after 48 months (9.0% with auxiliary versus 29.1% with dentist); but the net reduction in the number of teeth exhibiting caries was lower for teeth treated by the dental auxiliary than the dentist (three with auxiliary versus 60 with dentist, P value < 0.001). One study showed no evidence of a difference in dental decay after treatment with fissure sealants between groups. One study comparing the effectiveness of dental auxiliaries and dentists performing ART reported no difference in survival rates of the restorations (fillings) after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: We only identified five studies for inclusion in this review, all of which were at high risk of bias, and four were published more than 20 years ago, highlighting the paucity of high-quality evaluations of the relative effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety of dental auxiliaries compared with dentists in performing clinical tasks. No firm conclusions could be drawn from the present review about the relative effectiveness of dental auxiliaries and dentists.

Prevention of dental disease versus surgical treatment.

The members of the Minnesota legislature have debated methods by which access to dental care and treatment of dental disease can be improved at a cost lower than that of present delivery systems. This review sheds light on some significant aspects of what the dental profession has learned over the last century that has proven significantly beneficial to the overall health of the American populace. Recommendations are made in the use of cost-effective dental public health interventions that could be used to provide better access and improved dental health at lower cost.

Protocol for diagnostic test accuracy study: the efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by dental care professionals.

BACKGROUND: The bulk of service delivery in dentistry is delivered by general dental practitioners, when a large proportion of patients who attend regularly are asymptomatic and do not require treatment. This represents a substantial and unnecessary cost, given that it is possible to delegate a range of tasks to dental care professionals, who are a less expensive resource. Screening for the common dental diseases by dental care professionals has the potential to release general dental practitioner's time and increase the capacity to care for those who don't currently access services. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic test accuracy of dental care professionals when screening for dental caries and periodontal disease in asymptomatic adults aged eighteen years of age. METHODS/DESIGN: Ten dental practices across the North-West of England will take part in a diagnostic test accuracy study with 200 consecutive patients in each practice. The dental care professionals will act as the index test and the general dental practitioner will act as the reference test. Consenting asymptomatic patients will enter the study and see either the dental care professionals or general dental practitioner first to remove order effects. Both sets of clinicians will make an assessment of dental caries and periodontal disease and enter their decisions on a record sheet for each participant. The primary outcome measure is the diagnostic test accuracy of the dental care professionals and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values will be reported. A number of clinical factors will be assessed for confounding. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will determine whether dental care professionals can screen for the two most prevalent oral diseases. This will inform the literature and is apposite given the recent policy change in the United Kingdom towards direct access.

Economic feasibility of alternative practitioners for provision of dental care to the underserved.

This study assesses the viability of three alternative practitioner types for provision of dental care to the underserved. Key factors modeled include compensation, training and practice costs, productivity, and payer mix scenarios. Utilizing dental therapists or dental health aide therapists is cost-effective for enhancing access. However, to be sustainable, the practices will require a subsidy or a better reimbursement than modeled. Without tuition support, the debt burden will deter applicants mostlikely to treat the underserved.

Are procedures performed by dental auxiliaries safe and of comparable quality? A systematic review.

The objective of the current study was to systematically evaluate the existing evidence in relation to the safety, quality, productivity or cost-benefit, and patient satisfaction of the procedures performed by the different groups of dental providers. Due to the diversity of the procedures performed and the outcomes measured, it was not possible to create pooled estimates in a meaningful manner. Therefore, summary results of individual studies are presented and critically evaluated.

The impact of additional dental providers in the dental labor market on the income of private practice dentists.

This study estimates the impact that the entrance of hypothetical allied dental professionals into the dental labor market may have on the earnings of currently practicing private practice dentists. A simulation model that uses the most reliable available data was constructed and finds that the introduction of hypothetical allied dental professionals into the competitive California dental labor market is likely to have relatively small effects on the earnings of the average dentist in California.

Is general dentistry dead? How mid-level dental providers will affect the profession.

The rhetoric concerning mid-level providers and their impact on general dental practice is building in intensity. This is a complex issue and there is no clear picture of either the benefits or dangers to the public of such a delivery model, whether such plans are economically sustainable, or the role of general dentists in the configuration of future practices. The opinions of a representative sample of thinkers from various perspectives are sampled.

Dental therapy: another tongue in the babel of dental access for children.

The debate over midlevel dental care providers, such as dental therapists, is intense in emotion but light on facts and data. This opinion paper questions the applicability of dental therapy in the United States and offers a prediction for its very limited acceptance. More importantly, this paper suggests that the debate on dental therapy in the United States ignores crucial issues and will delay the likelihood of improvement in children's access to oral health care.

A letter from New Zealand: improving access to high quality dental services for all children.

As a career-long public health dentist spanning 25 years, I have had the privilege of working in two very different service delivery models providing dental care for children in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Neither model is perfect, but what is clear is that the facilities and workforce model that does exist in a country can have a profound impact on which children end up accessing that care and which children do not.

The working practices and career satisfaction of dental therapists in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the working practices and level of career satisfaction of dental therapists in New Zealand. DESIGN: Postal survey of dental therapists identified from the New Zealand Dental Council's dental therapy database. One mailing with one follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires were sent to 683 registered dental therapists. Replies were received from 566 (82.9%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Current working practice, career breaks, continuing education, career satisfaction. RESULTS: Respondents had a high career satisfaction, but were much less satisfied with their remuneration. After controlling for age and income satisfaction, therapists who felt that they were valued members of the dental community had over four times the odds of having higher overall job satisfaction. There were no differences in the mean career satisfaction scale score by age, but respondents aged 45 and over had a lower mean income satisfaction scale score than their younger counterparts (p<0.05). Older respondents were more likely to report regularly placing fissure sealants (p<0.05), participating in peer review (p<0.05), and playing a role in team management/coordination (p<0.05) than younger respondents. Most therapists (412; 82.2%) had taken at least one career break, usually for child rearing. A mean of 6.5 years (SD 5.9; range six weeks to 25 years) had been taken in career breaks. Younger therapists were more interested in moving into private practice than their older colleagues (p<0.05). More than half of respondents planned to retire from dental therapy within 10 years. CONCLUSION: Urgent action is required to improve the recruitment and retention of dental therapists in the New Zealand School Dental Service. Measures to reduce the time taken in career breaks could increase the productivity of this workforce. Remuneration and career progression are key issues; therapists need to feel that they are valued members of the dental profession.

Infection control: a survey of UK special care dentists and dental care professionals.

AIM: To determine attitudes to and practice of infection control among practitioners involved in special care dentistry. METHODS: A questionnaire on the issues of decontamination and infection control was sent to all 680 members of the British Society for Disability and Oral Health. RESULTS: The response rate was 63.5%. Almost all respondents (95%) reported having a local infection-control policy; most (97%) had local protocols for the management of inoculation injuries; most (81%) gave new staff training in infection-control procedures and most (74%) provided updates for established staff. Most respondents 'usually' or 'always' provided eye protection for patients (95%) and themselves (93%). Virtually all routinely wore gloves, and nearly all (94%) 'always' changed gloves between patients. The majority 'usually' or 'always' disinfected or disposed of surface coverings between patients (98%), sterilised all non-disposable instruments that had been set out for the patient (99%), and disinfected laboratory work (96%). CONCLUSIONS: There was high awareness of infection-control issues, and good reported compliance among these dental workers.

A look at allied dental education in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The American Dental Association conducts surveys of educational programs in dental assisting, dental hygiene and dental laboratory technology. The 2002-2003 survey included questions about enrollment, graduates, program information and trends. METHODS: The ADA Survey Center mailed the Survey of Allied Dental Education to 548 program directors of dental assisting, dental hygiene and dental laboratory technology educational programs. They also sent several follow-up notices as a reminder to complete the survey. A 100 percent response rate is mandatory for continued accreditation by the Commission on Dental Accreditation. Association staff members resolved inconsistencies in the data and analyzed them before producing a final report. RESULTS: The number of applications to, first-year enrollment in and number of graduates in dental hygiene and dental assisting educational programs have increased during the last five years. During the same period, the number of applications to, and graduates of, dental laboratory technology educational programs decreased, but first-year enrollment increased slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Results from these surveys help address the concerns of the public and the profession regarding allied dental manpower levels. They also provide information for those interested in applying to individual allied dental educational programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Private dental practices employ the majority of graduates of allied dental educational programs. Recent graduates of dental assisting and hygiene programs continue to supply the office staff members needed to support the delivery of dental care.