Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

BACKGROUND: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016-2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen. RESULTS: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p < .001), but had more antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (OR 11.7, p < .001) and more cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (OR 3.8, p = .04). There was no difference between BG and NBG in the incidence of malignancies or infections. When stratified by era (pre-2016 vs. 2016-2020), ACR remained less common in the BG than the NBG (36% vs. 50%, p = .045) groups, while AMR remained more common (9.7 vs. 0% p = .005). There was no significant difference in conditional survival comparing pre-and post-2016 NBG (HR 2.20 (95% CI.75-6.43); however, both pre-2016 BG and post-2016 BG have significantly higher mortality (HR 2.37 [95% CI 1.02-5.50) and HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.08-6.71), p = .045 and.03, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Basiliximab reduces the incidence of ACR but increases the risk of AMR, CAV, and may be associated with increased mortality. Mechanistic studies are needed to describe a potential T-cell-escape mechanism with enhanced humoral immunity.

Assessment of immunosuppression induction with basiliximab compared to antithymocyte-globulin in adult heart transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing heart transplants are at risk of rejection which can have significant morbidity and mortality. Induction immunosuppression at the time of transplant reduces the early risk and has additional benefits. The induction agent of choice within our program was changed from rabbit antithymocyte-globulin (rATG) to basiliximab, so it was necessary to evaluate whether this had any impact on patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to describe rejection, infection, and other outcomes in adult heart transplant patients at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. METHODS: This study was a nonrandomized, retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included with median ages 50 years versus 54 years. More female patients received rATG (20% vs. 42.4%). The most common indication for transplant in both cohorts was ICM (63.3% vs. 57.6%). Patients who received rATG had significantly higher PRA (0% vs. 43%, p < .001). Acute rejection episodes were similar between basiliximab and rATG at 3 months (16.7% vs. 15.1%; p = 1.0) and 6-months (30.0% vs. 18.1%; p = .376). Infections were not statistically different with basiliximab compared to rATG at 3-months, 43.3% vs. 63.6% and at 6-months 60.0% vs. 66.7%). There were no fatalities in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not demonstrate differences in rejection with basiliximab compared to rATG. Mortality did not differ, but basiliximab-treated patients had fewer infections and infection-related hospitalizations than those treated with rATG. Larger studies with longer durations are needed to more completely describe the differences in rejection and infectious outcomes.

Evaluation of Single Versus Two-Dose Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Live-Donor Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab is a high-cost induction agent typically given as two doses in liver transplant recipients. This study evaluated renal outcomes in live-donor liver transplant recipients (LDLTRs) with stable renal function at the time of transplant receiving one versus two doses of basiliximab. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 231 adult LDLTR with a serum creatinine (SCr) <1.5 mg/dL on post-transplant Day 5. The primary endpoint was a change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 between the groups. Secondary endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), liver rejection, and culture-positive infections within 3 and 6 months of transplant. Basiliximab-related cost savings were also evaluated. RESULTS: Median change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 was no different between the single-dose or two-dose groups (0.1 [IQR: -0.1-0.3] vs. 0.2 [IQR: -0.1-0.4], p = 0.08). Incidence of AKI was 56.9% in the two-dose group versus 39.0% in the single-dose group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in bacterial (p = 0.40), fungal (p = 0.59), or viral (p = 0.78) infections. Acute cellular rejection through 6 months post-transplant was noted in 9.7% of patients receiving two doses and 6.3% in the single-dose arm (p = 0.42). Basiliximab-related cost savings in the single-dose arm was ∼$697 863.72 over 159 transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose basiliximab appears to be safe and effective in place of two doses in LDLTR with stable renal function on post-transplant Day 5. Utilization of a single basiliximab dose significantly reduced medication-related costs.

Post-Kidney Transplant Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis From a Single Italian Center.

We describe the epidemiology of cancer after kidney transplantation (KTx), investigating its risk factors and impact on therapeutic management and survival in KTx recipients (KTRs). The association between modification of immunosuppressive (IS) therapy after cancer and survival outcomes was analyzed. We collected data from 930 KTRs followed for 7 [1-19] years. The majority of KTRs received KTx from a deceased donor (84%). In total, 74% of patients received induction therapy with basiliximab and 26% with ATG. Maintenance therapy included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolate. Patients with at least one cancer (CA+) amounted to 19%. NMSC was the most common tumor (55%). CA+ were older and had a higher BMI. Vasculitis and ADPKD were more prevalent in CA+. ATG was independently associated with CA+ and was related to earlier cancer development in survival and competing risk analyses (p = 0.01 and <0.0001; basiliximab 89 ± 4 vs. ATG 40 ± 4 months). After cancer diagnosis, a significant prognostic impact was derived from the shift to mTOR inhibitors compared to a definitive IS drug suspension (p = 0.004). Our data confirm the relevance of cancer as a complication in KTRs with ATG as an independent risk factor. An individualized choice of IS to be proposed at the time of KTx is crucial in the prevention of neoplastic risk. Finally, switching to mTORi could represent an important strategy to improve patient survival.

Efficacy and safety of single-dose anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (BAS) versus a single dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included all pediatric KTRs from May 2013 to April 2018 and followed up to 12 months. In the first period, all recipients received BAS, while from May 2016, a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG was instituted. Maintenance therapy consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor plus prednisone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included (BAS, n = 113; r-ATG, n = 114). The main combination of immunosuppressive drugs was tacrolimus, prednisone, and azathioprine in both groups (87% vs. 88%, p = .718). Patients receiving r-ATG showed superior survival-free of the composite endpoint (acute rejection, graft loss, or death; 76% vs. 61%, p = .003; HR 2.08, 1.29-3.34, p = .003) and lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% vs. 21%, p = .015). There was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV infection (33% vs. 37%, p = .457), PTLD (1% vs. 3%, p = .309), 30-day hospital readmissions (24% vs. 23%, p = .847), and kidney function at 12 months (86 ± 29 vs. 84 ± 30 mL/min/1.73m2, p = .614). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG is associated with higher efficacy for preventing acute rejection and similar safety profile compared to BAS.

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with decreased hospitalization rates in pediatric kidney transplant: A UNOS data review for safety and outcomes with common induction regimens.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that alemtuzumab use is safe in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with equivalent long-term outcomes compared to other induction agents. METHODS: Using pediatric kidney transplant recipient data in the UNOS database between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, multivariate logistic regression, multivariable Cox regression, and survival analyses were utilized to estimate the likelihoods of 1st-year and all-time hospitalizations, acute rejection, CMV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient mortality among recipients of three common induction regimens (ATG, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab). RESULTS: There were no differences in acute rejection or graft failure among induction or maintenance regimens. Basiliximab was associated with lower odds of DGF in deceased donor recipients (OR 0.77 [0.60-0.99], p = .04). Mortality was increased in patients treated with steroid-containing maintenance (HR 1.3 [1.005-1.7] p = .045). Alemtuzumab induction correlated with less risk of CMV infection than ATG (OR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .039). Steroid-containing maintenance conferred lower rate of PTLD compared to steroid-free maintenance (HR 0.59 [0.4-0.8] p = .001). Alemtuzumab was associated with less risk of hospitalization within 1 year (OR 0.79 [0.67-0.95] p = .012) and 5 years (HR 0.54 [0.46-0.65] p < .001) of transplantation. Steroid maintenance also decreased 5 years hospitalization risk (HR 0.78 [0.69-0.89] p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric KTRs may be safely treated with alemtuzumab induction without increased risk of acute rejection, DGF, graft loss, or patient mortality. The decreased risk of CMV infections and lower hospitalization rates compared to other agents make alemtuzumab an attractive choice for induction in pediatric KTRs, especially in those who cannot tolerate ATG.

A comparative analysis of kidney allograft outcomes in steroid use versus steroid discontinuation after basiliximab and ATG induction: A UNOS database study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relative safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant patients after basiliximab compared to anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy is unknown. We aimed to compare kidney allograft outcomes in steroid use versus steroid discontinuation after basiliximab and ATG induction from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the UNOS database and included first kidney transplant recipients who received ATG or basiliximab induction therapy. We compared graft and patient outcomes in those who received steroid maintenance and those who were discharged off steroids. RESULTS: Of 106,061 patients, 25,344 (86.7%) received basiliximab induction and were maintained on steroids (B-Sm), and 3,880 (13.3%) were on a steroid-free regimen (B-Sf). Graft failure rate was significantly higher in the B-Sf compared to B-Sm at 1-year (4.1 vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), 3-year (6.0 vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001) and 5-year follow-up (7.7 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.0004). The mortality rate was significantly higher in B-Sf at 1-year (3.3 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.0005), 3-year (7.6 vs. 5.5%, p < 0.001) and 5-year follow-up (11.5 vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001) when compared to the B-Sm. 76,837 recipients received ATG induction therapy, 51,745 (72.4%) were on steroid maintenance therapy (A-Sm) and 25,092 (32.6%) were on a steroid-free regimen (A-Sf). The graft failure rate was significantly higher in A-Sf compared to A-Sm at 1-year follow-up (2.6 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.0006), however, there was no difference at 3-year (5.0 vs. 5.0%, p = 0.53) or 5-year follow-up (7.2 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.17). There was no difference in mortality rates between A-Sf vs. A-Sm at 1 year (2.5 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.98) and at 3 years (5.5 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.45), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who were maintained on steroids after basiliximab induction had better 5-year allograft survival and patient survival compared to those who were not maintained on steroids. However, steroid maintenance conferred no additional benefit after ATG induction and was associated with higher mortality.

Ruxolitinib versus basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective study.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended.

Impact of induction therapy on cytomegalovirus infection and post-transplant outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving routine antiviral prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES: Induction therapy has been increasingly used in pediatric heart transplantation. This study evaluated the impact of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) versus basiliximab as induction therapy on post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, rejection at 1 year, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving antiviral prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients (age < 18 years) analyzed, 46 (47.9%) patients received basiliximab, and 50 (52.1%) received ATG. Median follow-up was 3.0 (IQR, 1.7-4.9) years with 32.3% reporting CMV infection. The ATG group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had similar incidences of CMV infection (36% vs. 28.3%, p = .418), CMV viremia (22% vs. 19.6%, p = .769), and CMV-positive tissue biopsy (30% vs. 22%, p = .486). The ATG group had lower incidences of rejection at 1 year (16% vs. 36.9%, p = .022) and CAV (4% vs. 23.9%, p = .006) with no difference in mortality (8% vs. 15.2%, p = .343), compared with the basiliximab group. Multivariate analysis showed that induction with ATG was associated with a lower risk of rejection at 1 year (OR, .31; 95% CI, .09-.94; p = .039) with no impact on the incidences of CMV infection (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, .54-7.89; p = .292), CAV (HR, .30; 95% CI, .04-2.58; p = .275), and mortality (HR, .39; 95% CI, .09-1.82; p = .233) compared to basiliximab induction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, induction with ATG was associated with reduction in risk of rejection at 1 year with no effects on CMV infection, CAV, and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients with universal antiviral prophylaxis compared with basiliximab induction therapy.

Basiliximab therapy for immune-mediated bowel disease in a pediatric heart transplant patient.

In pediatric patients who undergo heart transplantation, severe immune-mediated bowel disease has been reported. Management is complex, and there are little data discussing the use of basiliximab for immune-mediated bowel disease. This case report discusses a pediatric patient who developed immune-mediated bowel disease following heart transplantation and was successfully managed with basiliximab.

Basiliximab as maintenance immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients: A single pediatric center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant recipients are at risk for complications from prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive drugs, pharmacokinetic challenges in maintaining consistent immunosuppression, and medication non-adherence. Basiliximab (BAS), an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, is used for induction therapy across many pediatric heart transplant centers, but use as maintenance immunosuppression has not been well described. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single pediatric center cohort study of heart transplant recipients who received BAS for maintenance immunosuppression (defined as >2 monthly doses) from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Ten patients met study criteria with a median age of 17.5 (5-22) years and median 9.6 (1.2-18.9) years since transplant at time of BAS initiation. The primary indications for BAS use were recurrent rejection (n = 4), fluctuating immunosuppression levels (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 3). A median of 5.5 (3-32) monthly BAS doses were received. Three patients had a rejection event while on BAS. Calcineurin inhibitor exposure was reduced in 70% of patients. Three of the 10 patients were alive at last follow-up. There was one documented infection during BAS use, and no hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly BAS infusions were well tolerated and allowed for reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure in most patients. Mortality commonly occurred despite BAS use, potentially reflecting the acuity of this patient cohort. BAS can be considered for maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric patients with fluctuating immunosuppressive levels and/or renal dysfunction. More studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes and explore expanded use of BAS in the pediatric heart transplant population.

Basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A real-world analysis.

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the leading causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We investigated the efficacy, safety, prognostic factors, and optimal therapeutic protocol for SR-aGVHD patients treated with basiliximab in a real-world setting. Nine hundred and forty SR-aGVHD patients were recruited from 36 hospitals in China, and 3683 doses of basiliximab were administered. Basiliximab was used as monotherapy (n = 642) or in combination with other second-line treatments (n = 298). The cumulative incidence of overall response rate (ORR) at day 28 after basiliximab treatment was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.5%-82.3%). The probabilities of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival at 3 years after basiliximab treatment were 26.8% (95% CI 24.0%-29.6%) and 64.3% (95% CI 61.2%-67.4%), respectively. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between the monotherapy and combined therapy groups. Combined therapy did not increase the ORR; conversely, it increased the infection rates compared with monotherapy. The multivariate analysis showed that combined therapy, grade III-IV aGVHD, and high-risk refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score before basiliximab treatment were independently associated with the therapeutic response. Hence, we created a prognostic scoring system that could predict the risk of having a decreased likelihood of response after basiliximab treatment. Machine learning was used to develop a protocol that maximized the efficacy of basiliximab while maintaining acceptable levels of infection risk. Thus, real-world data suggest that basiliximab is safe and effective for treating SR-aGVHD.

Adoptive therapy with cytomegalovirus-specific T cells for cytomegalovirus infection after haploidentical stem cell transplantation and factors affecting efficacy.

Adoptive therapy with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CMV-CTLs) has emerged as an effective method for CMV infection. However, the efficacy reportedly ranges from 50% to 90%, and factors affecting anti-CMV efficacy have not been established. We investigated the safety and efficacy of adoptive therapy with CMV-CTLs for CMV infection in 190 patients after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT), and importantly, we analyzed the main factors affecting antiviral efficacy. The CMV peak titer decreased from 19 (range, 1.0-503.0) × 103 copies/mL to 3.9 (range, 0-112) × 103 copies/mL after CMV-CTL infusion. The cumulative complete response (CR) rates in the first, fourth, and sixth weeks after the first CMV-CTL infusion were 37.9% (95% CI 35.0-40.8), 76.8% (95% CI 70.7-82.9), and 89.5% (95% CI 85.2-93.8), respectively. In multivariate analysis, persistent CMV infection prior to CMV-CTL infusion (hazard ratio [HR] 2.29, 95% CI 1.29-4.06, p = .005) and basiliximab treatment within 2 weeks of CMV-CTL infusion (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.06-3.81, p = .031) were independent predictors of poor antiviral efficacy of CMV-CTL therapy. Our data showed that adoptive therapy with CMV-CTLs is a safe and effective treatment for CMV infection after haplo-SCT. Persistent CMV infection and basiliximab treatment are correlated with poor anti-CMV efficacy of CMV-CTL therapy.

Induction therapy in lung transplantation: A contemporary analysis of trends and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We provide a contemporary consideration of long-term outcomes and trends of induction therapy use following lung transplantation in the United States. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry from 2006 to 2018 for first-time, adult, lung-only transplant recipients. Long-term survival was compared between induction classes (Interleukin-2 inhibitors, monoclonal or polyclonal cell-depleting agents, and no induction therapy). A 1:1 propensity score match was performed, pairing patients who received basiliximab with similar risk recipients who did not receive induction therapy. Outcomes in matched populations were compared using Cox, Kaplan-Meier and Logistic regression modeling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 22 025 recipients were identified; 8003 (36.34%) were treated with no induction therapy, 11 045 (50.15%) with basiliximab, 1556 (7.06%) with alemtuzumab and 1421 (6.45%) with anti-thymocyte globulin. Compared with those who received no induction, patients receiving basiliximab, alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin were found on multivariable Cox-regression analyses to have lower long-term mortality (all p < .05). Following propensity score matching of basiliximab and no induction populations, analyses demonstrated a statistically significant association between basiliximab use and long- term survival (p < .001). Basiliximab was also associated with a lower risk of acute rejection (p < .001) and renal failure (p = .002). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy for lung transplant recipients-specifically basiliximab-is associated with improved long-term survival and a lower risk of renal failure or acute rejection.

Association of tacrolimus time-to-therapeutic range on renal dysfunction and acute cellular rejection after orthotopic heart transplantation in a high use basiliximab population.

BACKGROUND: Currently, clinicians often delay initiation of tacrolimus after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) to help mitigate nephrotoxicity. This study aimed to determine if there is an association between the time-to-therapeutic range (TTT) of tacrolimus, early renal dysfunction, and acute cellular rejection (ACR) after OHT. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single center study with adult patients who underwent OHT from July 2013 to April 2020. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the association of TTT with new renal dysfunction after tacrolimus initiation post-OHT. RESULTS: In a study of 317 patients, the unadjusted analysis showed patients who developed new renal dysfunction after tacrolimus initiation had a numerically shorter TTT (9.5 vs. 11.0 days, P = .065), and were more likely to have supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels (56% vs. 39.2%, P = .010). When adjusted for established risk factors for renal dysfunction, TTT was significantly associated with new renal dysfunction (OR .95; 95% CI [.90, .99], P = .03). There was no association between TTT and the incidence of ACR (11.1 vs. 10.8 days, P = .64). CONCLUSION: When adjusting for known risk factors, a shorter TTT was associated with new renal dysfunction. Supratherapeutic tacrolimus levels were also associated with new renal dysfunction. There was no association between TTT and ACR in the setting of high use basiliximab induction.

Antithymocyte globulin induction therapy and myocardial complement deposition in pediatric heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) consists of polyclonal antibodies directed primarily against human T lymphocytes but may contain antibodies with affinity for other tissues in the transplanted organ, resulting in complement (C4d) deposition. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) of adult cardiac transplants. We examined the relationship of induction immunosuppression with ATG and C4d deposition in EMB of pediatric cardiac transplants. METHODS: Results of C4d immunohistochemistry were available from all EMB of patients transplanted at our center between June 2012 and April 2018 (n = 48) who received induction immunosuppression with either ATG (n = 20) or basiliximab (n = 28) as the standard of care. RESULTS: C4d deposition in the first year post-heart transplant was more commonly seen among patients who received ATG induction (20% of EMBs in ATG group vs 1% of EMBs in basiliximab group; p < .0001). C4d deposition related to ATG was observed early post-transplant (50% ATG vs 0% basiliximab on first EMB; p < .0001 and 35% ATG vs 0% basiliximab on the second EMB; p = .0012). While this difference waned by the third EMB (5% ATG vs 0% basiliximab; p = .41), positive C4d staining persisted to the sixth EMB in the ATG group only (6%). CONCLUSION: C4d deposition is common on EMB up to 1 year post-pediatric cardiac transplant following ATG induction. This high rate of positive C4d staining in the absence of histologic AMR after ATG induction therapy must be accounted for in making clinical decisions regarding cardiac allograft rejection diagnosis and treatment.

Prognostic factors and long-term follow-up of basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: Updated experience from a large-scale study.

Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) is one of the most important causes of early mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), particularly for those with steroid-refractory (SR)-aGVHD. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors and long-term clinical outcomes of basiliximab treatment for SR-aGVHD. Basiliximab was administered on days 1, 3, and 8, and repeated weekly until aGVHD was less than grade II, or patients showed no response after four doses. Out of 1498 patients receiving allo-HSCT, 230 patients with SR-aGVHD were enrolled. Grade III to IV aGVHD before basiliximab treatment significantly and independently predicted a poorer response to basiliximab in multivariate analysis. And, the cumulative incidence of overall response at 14 days, 28 days, and 56 days after treatment was 41.4% vs 23.1% (P = .023), 70.2% vs 43.6% (P = .002), and 80.1% vs 66.7% (P = .013), respectively. This was for those with grade II and grade III to IV aGVHD. Patients receiving more than four doses of basiliximab had higher rates of infections. The 4-year cumulative incidence of total and severe chronic GVHD after basiliximab treatment was 44.8% (95% CI 38.3%-51.3%) and 2.2% (95% CI 0.3%-4.1%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival after basiliximab treatment was 11.3% (95% CI 7.2%-15.4%), 30.0% (95% CI 24.1%-35.9%), 58.7% (95% CI 52.3%-65.1%), and 61.7% (95% CI 55.4%-68.0%), respectively. Comorbidities before allo-HSCT and refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score at diagnosis had significant influences on long-term survival. Thus, basiliximab was a safe and effective treatment for patients with SR-aGVHD.

Induction immunosuppression strategies and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

Although the use of induction therapy has reduced the risk of acute rejection after heart transplantation, its use may be associated with other adverse outcomes. We aimed to examine the effect of no induction (NoInd), induction with basiliximab (BAS), or induction with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) on outcome after heart transplantation. We analyzed data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) registry for adult heart transplants performed between 2000 and 2013. The primary outcome was cumulative all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was cause-specific death. We identified 27 369 transplants whose recipients received NoInd (n = 15 688), ATG (n = 6830), or BAS (n = 4851). Over a median follow-up of 1497 days, overall 30-day mortality was 5% and 1-year mortality was 11%. Survival after transplant was similar in patients treated with NoInd compared with ATG. The survival was improved using NoInd compared with BAS (log-rank P = .040), adjustment HR = 1.11 (95% CI, 1.04-1.19). Compared to NoInd, BAS was associated with higher risk of graft failure-related deaths, HR = 1.27 (95% CI, 1.02-1.58), and ATG was associated with higher risk of malignancy-related deaths, HR = 1.18 (95% CI, 1.01-1.39). Survival of patients who received NoInd was similar to ATG and better compared with BAS. Further, the use of ATG may be associated with increased malignancy-related mortality, compared with NoInd.

Immunosuppressive Drug-Associated Adverse Event Profiles in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses.

BACKGROUND: The safety of immunosuppressive regimens is influenced by the induction agent, maintenance drug combination, and prophylactic strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Herein, this safety analysis compares rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) or basiliximab (BAS) combined with everolimus (EVR) versus BAS combined with mycophenolate sodium (MPS) in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, prednisone, and preemptive CMV therapy. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized study, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), viral infections, laboratory abnormalities, dose reductions, and temporary or permanent discontinuation of the immunosuppressant were compared among patients receiving r-ATG/EVR (n = 85), BAS/EVR (n = 102), and BAS/MPS (n = 101). RESULTS: A total of 2741 AEs and 344 SAEs were observed. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with at least one AE (96% versus 98% versus 96%, respectively; P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with at least one SAE was highest in the BAS/MPS group (33% versus 48% versus 69%, respectively; P < 0.05). This difference was due primarily to a high incidence of CMV infection in the BAS/MPS group (4.7% versus 10.8% versus 37.6%, respectively). The incidence of mild/moderate abnormalities in creatinine, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels was higher in both EVR groups. The cumulative freedom from dose reduction or treatment discontinuation due to an AE was higher in both EVR groups than in the BAS/MPS group (89.2% versus 92.8% versus 76.3%, respectively, P = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (9.4% versus 18.6 versus 15.8%, respectively; P = 0.403). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that r-ATG induction combined with EVR is associated with a comparable incidence of acute rejection, lower incidence of CMV infection, and fewer changes in initial immunosuppressive regimen due to AEs in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, prednisone, and preemptive CMV therapy.