Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , FemeninoRESUMEN
The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Neoplasias Renales , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/radioterapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Radiocirugia/normas , Urología/normasRESUMEN
A diagnosis of brain metastasis (BM) significantly affects quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Although systemic treatments have shown efficacy in mRCC, active surveillance (AS) is still commonly used in clinical practice. In this single-center cohort study, we assessed the impact of different initial treatment strategies for metastatic RCC (mRCC) on the development of BM. All consecutive patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2011 and 2022 were included at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, the Netherlands, and a subgroup of patients with BM was selected. In total, 381 patients with mRCC (ECM, BM, or both) were identified. Forty-six patients had BM of whom 39 had metachronous BM (diagnosed ≥1 month after ECM). Twenty-five (64.1%) of these 39 patients with metachronous BM had received prior systemic treatment for ECM and 14 (35.9%) patients were treatment naive at BM diagnosis. The median BM-free survival since ECM diagnosis was significantly longer (p = .02) in previously treated patients (29.0 [IQR 12.6-57.0] months) compared to treatment naive patients (6.8 [IQR 1.0-7.0] months). In conclusion, patients with mRCC who received systemic treatment for ECM prior to BM diagnosis had a longer BM-free survival as compared to treatment naïve patients. These results emphasize the need for careful evaluation of treatment strategies, and especially AS, for patients with mRCC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Países Bajos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Immunotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC); however, the absence of effective biomarkers poses a challenge in predicting the efficacy of these regimens. This study aims to explore the predictive and prognostic value of serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) in mccRCC patients undergoing IO-TKI therapy. METHODS: Ninety-six mccRCC patients treated with IO-TKI therapy from 2019 to 2023 were enrolled and serum IgA levels were assessed at the pretreatment baseline and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Notably, baseline levels of IgA showed no correlation with the objective response rate. However, patients achieving complete or partial responses exhibited a remarkable decrease in IgA levels, while those with stable or progressive disease displayed an increase in IgA levels after 3 months of treatment. Furthermore, the dynamic alteration in IgA levels after 3 months of treatment demonstrated predictive value for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves exhibited outstanding performance in predicting PFS (AUC 0.793) and OS (AUC 0.738). CONCLUSION: Taken together, this study demonstrates that dynamic alteration of serum IgA after 3 months of treatment was significantly correlated with prognosis and therapeutic efficacy in mccRCC patients.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Inmunoglobulina A , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/sangre , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
AIMS: To evaluate short-term clinical and long-term survival outcomes of pancreatic resection for pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing pancreatic resection for metastasis from RCC over a 12-years period was conducted. Furthermore, a systematic search of electronic data sources and bibliographic reference lists were conducted to identify studies investigating the same clinical question. Short-term clinical and long-term survival outcomes were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were constructed for survival outcomes. Cox-proportional regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with survival. Finally, meta-analysis of survival outcomes was conducted using random-effects modelling. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent pancreatic resections for RCC pancreatic metastasis within the study period. The mean age of the included patients was 63.8 ± 8.0 years. There were 10(55.6 %) male and 8(44.4 %) female patients. Pancreatectomy was associated with 4(25.0 %) Clavien-Dindo (C-D) I, 5(31.3 %) C-D II, and 7(43.7 %) C-D III complications, 7(38.8 %) pancreatic fistula, 3(16.7 %) post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis, 1(5.6 %) delayed gastric emptying, and 1(5.6 %) chyle leak. The mean length of hospital stay was 18 ± 16.3 days. The median survival was 64 months (95 % CI 60-78). The 3-and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 83.3 % and 55.5 %, respectively. The 3-and 5-year survival rates were 100 % and 55.6 %, respectively. The pooled analyses of 553 patients demonstrated 3-and 5-year survival rates of 77.6 % and 60.7 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatectomy for RCC metastasis is associated with acceptable short-term clinical and promising long-term survival outcomes. Considering the rarity of the entity, escalation of level of evidence in this context is challenging.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Aguda , Pancreatitis/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed cancer treatment but are associated with cardiovascular toxicity, including heart failure. This review examines the cardiotoxicity of pazopanib, a VEGFR-TKI, through two case reports and explores potential mechanisms. The importance of vigilant clinical monitoring to prevent cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients receiving pazopanib is emphasized. We present two cases of acute heart failure following pazopanib treatment. Case 1 involves a comorbidity-free, 62-year-old woman with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who experienced irreversible heart failure. In case 2, a 40-year-old woman with a history of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy developed reversible left ventricular systolic dysfunction following pazopanib discontinuation. Both patients received appropriate management for their heart failure symptoms. Case 1's condition rapidly deteriorated, leading to her unfortunate demise 3 months after starting pazopanib. In contrast, case 2's cardiac function improved after discontinuing pazopanib. The advent of TKIs has revolutionized cancer treatment, but their association with cardiovascular toxicity necessitates meticulous monitoring of patients. The cases presented here highlight the importance of recognizing and managing cardiotoxicity, particularly in patients without prior cardiovascular risk factors. Understanding the underlying mechanisms and risk factors for TKI-induced heart failure is crucial to optimize patient care and treatment outcomes. Oncologists should be vigilant in identifying clinical symptoms and closely monitoring cardiac function throughout TKI therapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Neoplasias Renales , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Indazoles/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Numerous prognostic factors have been described for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). There are nomograms to assist in clinical decision-making and inform patients of their disease progression. However, they have a limited capacity and moderate concordance rates. Performance status (PS) is one of the most widely used prognostic factors and most closely related to overall survival (OS), but this is a subjective assessment based solely on the clinician's opinion. Patients must be at the center of care. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have shown benefits but are not widespread in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We analyzed 78 consecutive patients diagnosed with mRCC who initiated treatment at our institution between September 2012 and September 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the sample's baseline characteristics and the NCCN FKSI 19 questionnaire. We also conducted a survival analysis. RESULTS: The baseline FKSI 19 score demonstrates its prognostic potential, HR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.97). Our prognostic model would include: FKSI < 58 (HR 3.61 95% CI 1.97-6.61), anemia, thrombocytosis, non-clear cell histology, and metastatic hepatic involvement. AUC 0.86 (95%CI 0.77-0.95). CONCLUSION: Although it would need external validation, the proposed nomogram could be an alternative to other previously described models. The NCCN FKSI 19 baseline score could replace the clinician's subjective determination of PS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Nomogramas , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinforme , Adulto , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the benefit the metastasectomy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). METHODS: This study enrolled 120 patients with confirmed metastatic non-ccRCC from the RCC database of our center from 2008 to 2021. Patients without metastasectomy were grouped as radical nephrectomy without metastasectomy patients. The clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess potential factors that predict clinical benefits from metastasectomy. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients received radical nephrectomy alone, while the remaining 20 patients underwent both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups. Out of 100 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy, 60 were male, and out of 20 patients who had both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy, 12 were male. Patients who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy had significantly better PFS (27.1 vs. 14.0, p = 0.032) and OS (67.3 vs. 24.0, p = 0.043) than those who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy alone. Furthermore, for patients without liver metastasis (n = 54), systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.043). Similarly, for patients with metachronous metastasis, systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.043) and OS (p = 0.032). None of the patients experienced serious perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ III grade). CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy in patients with metastatic non-ccRCC may provide clinical benefits in terms of improved PFS and OS, especially in patients without liver metastasis and those with metachronous metastasis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Metastasectomía , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate clinical and radiological differences between kidney metastases to the lung (RCCM +) and metachronous lung cancer (LC) detected during follow-up in patients surgically treated for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: cM0 surgically-treated RCC who harbored a pulmonary mass during follow-up were retrospectively scrutinized. Univariate logistic regression assessed predictive features for differentiating between LC and RCCM + . Multivariable analyses (MVA) were fitted to predict factors that could influence time between detection and histological diagnosis of the pulmonary mass, and how this interval could impact on survivals. RESULTS: 87% had RCCM + and 13% had LC. LC were more likely to have smoking history (75% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and less aggressive RCC features (cT1-2: 94% vs. 65%, p = 0.01; pT1-2: 88% vs. 41%, p = 0.02; G1-2: 88% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). The median interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection was longer between LC (55 months [32.8-107.2] vs. 20 months [9.0-45.0], p = 0.01). RCCM + had a higher likelihood of multiple (3[1-4] vs. 1[1-1], p < 0.001) and bilateral (51% vs. 6%, p = 0.002) pulmonary nodules, whereas LC usually presented with a solitary pulmonary nodule, less than 20 mm. Univariate analyses revealed that smoking history (OR:0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001) and interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection (OR:0.99; 95% CI 0.97-1.00; p = 0.002) predicted a higher risk of LC. Conversely, size (OR:1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p = 0.003), clinical stage (OR:1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23; p < 0.001), pathological stage (OR:1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.22; p < 0.001), grade (OR:1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.23; p < 0.001), presence of necrosis (OR:1.17; 95% CI 1.04-1.32; p = 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (OR:1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.37; p = 0.03) of primary RCC predicted a higher risk of RCCM + . Furthermore, number (OR:1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001) and bilaterality (OR:1.23; 95% CI 1.09-1.38; p < 0.001) of pulmonary lesions predicted a higher risk of RCCM + . Survival analysis showed a median second PFS of 10.9 years (95% CI 3.3-not reached) for LC and a 3.8 years (95% CI 3.2-8.4) for RCCM + . The median OS time was 6.5 years (95% CI 4.4-not reached) for LC and 6 years (95% CI 4.3-11.6) for RCCM + . CONCLUSIONS: Smoking history, primary grade and stage of RCC, interval between RCC surgery and lung mass detection, and number of pulmonary lesions appear to be the most valuable predictors for differentiating new primary lung cancer from RCC progression.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , NefrectomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are rare. This study evaluated the surgical pathology and outcomes after resection of RCC metastases to the pancreas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021, of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for metastases from RCC. Data were retrieved from a prospectively managed database and patient demographics, comorbidities, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and overall survival were analyzed. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (17 males, 8 females, median age 66 range 51 - 79 year), all with metachronous metastases. Median time from resection of the primary to operation for pancreatic RCC was 95.6 (12.0 - 309.7) months. Twenty-four patients were operated with intended cure (four pancreaticoduodenectomies, three total pancreatectomies, 17 distal pancreatectomies) and one patient had abortive surgery due to dissemination. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in nine patients (36%), and one patient died during hospital stay. Eight patients (33.3%) developed exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection. Fifteen patients (60%) had recurrence 21.7 (4.9 - 61.6) months after pancreatic operation. Five patients (25%) died from RCC during follow-up 46.3 (25.6 - 134.8) months after pancreatic resection. Five-year OS and DFS were83.6% and 32.3%, respectively. Median OS after pancreatic surgery was 134.8 months, independent of resection of previous extrapancreatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection for metastases from RCC offers favorable prognosis with a curative potential and should be considered a valuable treatment option even in the era of novel targeted treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Páncreas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/patología , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a recommended first-line therapy regimen for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, it is not clear which patient characteristics are associated with its effectiveness. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 67 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy in multiple institutions from September 2018 to August 2022. We analyzed the relationships between survival outcomes and patient-related variables, including paraneoplastic symptoms. We also analyzed the relationships between changes in symptoms and parameters and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 67 patients, 32 patients had paraneoplastic symptoms. The median progression-free survival was 14.9 months and median overall survival was 43.3 months. The objective response rate was 49.25% (33 patients), including two patients with complete response. Patients with cytoreductive nephrectomy, bone metastasis, high C-reactive protein levels and paraneoplastic symptoms were significantly correlated with short progression-free survival in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of these factors showed that the presence of paraneoplastic symptoms at treatment initiation remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival. Of the 32 patients with paraneoplastic symptoms at treatment initiation, 12 patients had symptomatic improvement and 20 did not. The 1-year progression-free survival rates were significantly longer in improved patients compared with those with no improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without cytoreductive nephrectomy and with bone metastasis, liver metastasis, high C-reactive protein levels and paraneoplastic symptoms were significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival. The presence of paraneoplastic symptoms was an independent predictor of progression-free survival. Improvement in paraneoplastic symptoms may reflect the treatment efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Ipilimumab , Neoplasias Renales , Nivolumab , Humanos , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , NefrectomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lung immune prognostic index is based on derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase level. Lung immune prognostic index has reported association with survival outcomes in patients with various malignancies undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the prognostic impact of pre-treatment lung immune prognostic index in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment remains unclear. This study examines the association between lung immune prognostic index and outcomes in this setting. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 156 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at eight institutions. We assessed the associations between pre-treatment lung immune prognostic index and survival outcomes including progression-free survival, second progression-free survival (PFS2), cancer-specific survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Patients were classified into good (n = 84, 54%), intermediate (n = 52, 33%) and poor (n = 20, 13%) lung immune prognostic index groups. Progression-free survival did not significantly differ between lung immune prognostic index groups, but there was significant difference in PFS2, cancer-specific survival and overall survival. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses, high pre-treatment lung immune prognostic index was a significant predictor of poor PFS2 (vs. good group, intermediate group: P = 0.01 and poor group: P = 0.04) and poor overall survival (vs. good group, intermediate group: P = 0.01 and poor group: P < 0.01). Moreover, the patients with poor lung immune prognostic index had significantly poorer cancer-specific survival than those with good LIPI (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High pre-treatment LIPI is suggested by our results to be a significant independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Ipilimumab , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Nivolumab , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pronóstico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , NeutrófilosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nephrectomy is the surgical removal of all or part of a kidney. When the aim of nephrectomy is to reduce tumor burden in people with established metastatic disease, the procedure is called cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). CN is typically combined with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). SACT can be initiated before or immediately after the operation or deferred until radiological signs of disease progression. The benefits and harms of CN are controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone or watchful waiting in newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, two trial registries, and other gray literature sources up to 1 March 2024. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated SACT and CN versus SACT alone or watchful waiting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were time to death from any cause and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were time to disease progression, treatment response, treatment-related mortality, discontinuation due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified 10 records of four unique RCTs that informed two comparisons. In this abstract, we focus on the results for the two primary outcomes. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus systemic anticancer therapy versus systemic anticancer therapy alone Three RCTs informed this comparison. Due to the considerable heterogeneity when pooling across these studies, we decided to present the results of the prespecified subgroup analysis by type of systemic agent. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus interferon immunotherapy versus interferon immunotherapy alone CN plus interferon immunotherapy compared with interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 0.89; I²= 0%; 2 studies, 326 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Assuming 820 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive interferon immunotherapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 132 fewer all-cause deaths (237 fewer to 37 fewer) per 1000 people who receive CN plus interferon immunotherapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Cytoreductive nephrectomy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone We are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy compared with TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37; 1 study, 450 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Assuming 574 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive TKI therapy alone, the effect estimate corresponds to 38 more all-cause deaths (38 fewer to 115 more) per 1000 people who receive CN plus TKI therapy. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. Immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy One study evaluated CN followed by TKI therapy (immediate CN) versus three cycles of TKI therapy followed by CN (deferred CN). Immediate CN compared with deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.53; 1 study, 99 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assuming 620 all-cause deaths at two years' follow-up per 1000 people who receive deferred CN, the effect estimate corresponds to 173 more all-cause deaths (18 more to 294 more) per 1000 people who receive immediate CN. We found no evidence to assess quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: CN plus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy versus SACT in the form of interferon immunotherapy alone probably increases time to death from any cause. However, we are very uncertain about the effect of CN plus SACT in the form of TKI therapy versus SACT in the form of TKI therapy alone on time to death from any cause. Immediate CN versus deferred CN may decrease time to death from any cause. We found no quality of life data for any of these three comparisons. We also found no evidence to inform any other comparisons, in particular those involving newer immunotherapy agents (programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1]/programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] immune checkpoint inhibitors), which have become the backbone of SACT for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. There is an urgent need for RCTs that explore the role of CN in the context of contemporary forms of systemic immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Espera Vigilante , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Causas de Muerte , SesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While approximately 40% of patients treated with NIVO + IPI achieve a durable response, 20% develop primary resistance with severe consequences. Therefore, there is a clinical need for criteria to select patients suitable for NIVO + IPI therapy to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, our aim was to evaluate the association between candidate biomarkers measured before treatment initiation and survival. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study of 183 patients with mRCC treated with systematic therapies between August 2015 and July 2023. Of these, 112 received NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy: mean age, 68 years; men, 83.0% (n = 93), and clear cell histology, 80.4% (n = 90). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate associations between biomarkers and survival. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, high C-reactive protein and systemic index, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and a low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were associated with shorter overall survival (OS). On multivariable analysis, a LMR ≤ 3 was retained as an independent factor associated to shorter OS with the highest accuracy (C-index, 0.656; hazard ratio, 7.042; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-25.0; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: A low LMR may identify patients who would be candidate for NIVO + IPI therapy for mRCC.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Ipilimumab , Neoplasias Renales , Linfocitos , Monocitos , Nivolumab , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported reliable prognostic factors for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, we investigated prognostic factors in patients treated with ICIs for unresectable or metastatic RCC. METHODS: We included 43 patients who received ICI treatment for RCC between January 2018 and October 2021. Blood samples were drawn before treatment, and 73 soluble factors in the plasma were analyzed using a bead-based multiplex assay. We examined factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAE) using the Chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier method, and the COX proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Patients exhibited a median PFS and OS of 212 and 783 days, respectively. Significant differences in both PFS and OS were observed for MMP1 (PFS, p < 0.001; OS, p = 0.003), IL-1ß (PFS, p = 0.021; OS, p = 0.008), sTNFR-1 (PFS, p = 0.017; OS, p = 0.005), and IL-6 (PFS, p = 0.004; OS, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in PFS for MMP1 (hazard ratio [HR] 5.305, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.648-17.082; p = 0.005) and OS for IL-6 (HR 23.876, 95% CI, 3.426-166.386; p = 0.001). Moreover, 26 patients experienced irAE, leading to ICI discontinuation or withdrawal. MMP1 was significantly associated with irAE (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: MMP1 may be associated with severe irAE, and MMP1, IL-1ß, sTNFR-1, and IL-6 could serve as prognostic factors in unresectable or metastatic RCC treated with ICIs. MMP1 and IL-6 were independent predictors of PFS and OS, respectively. Thus, inhibiting these soluble factors may be promising for enhancing antitumor responses in patients with RCC treated with ICIs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Interleucina-1beta , Interleucina-6 , Neoplasias Renales , Metaloproteinasa 1 de la Matriz , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Interleucina-6/sangre , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Metaloproteinasa 1 de la Matriz/sangre , Interleucina-1beta/sangre , Receptores Tipo I de Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/sangre , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety profile of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (a/mRCC) in a real-world setting. METHODS: We analyzed data of adult a/mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. Data were derived from the German non-interventional post-approval multicenter STAR-TOR registry (NCT00700258). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using descriptive statistics and survival analyses for the entire cohort and patient subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 116 study sites recruited 702 patients treated with sunitinib (73.1% male; median age 68.0 years; median Karnofsky index 90%) between November 2010 and May 2020. The most frequent histological subtype was clear cell RCC (81.6%). Sunitinib was administered as first-line treatment in 83.5%, as second line in 11.7%, and as third line or beyond in 4.8% of the patients. Drug-related AEs and serious AEs were reported in 66.3% and 13.9% of the patients, respectively (most common AE: gastrointestinal disorders; 39.7% of all patients). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds further real-world evidence of the persisting relevance of sunitinib for patients with a/mRCC who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study population includes a high proportion of patients with unfavorable MSKCC poor-risk score, but shows still good PFS and OS results, while the drug demonstrates a favorable safety profile. The STAR-TOR registry is also registered in the database of US library of medicine (NCT00700258).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Sistema de Registros , Sunitinib , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
We present a case of a 47-year-old male with severe atopic dermatitis and metastatic renal cell carcinoma managed successfully with dupilumab. This case further supports the safety of dupilumab in patients with active malignancy, an area currently with limited data.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Dermatitis Atópica , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Masculino , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patologíaRESUMEN
We present the case of a 60-year-old male patient who was admitted to our hospital after experiencing a syncopal episode. First ECGs showed sinus rhythm with polymorphic premature ventricular complexes and later ventricular tachycardia with a left bundle branch block morphology were recorded. Imaging with TEE and MRI revealed a space-occupying lesion in the left ventricle, which was ultimately identified as a rare cardiac metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Treatment was initiated with monoclonal antibodies resulting in lesion regression. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive diagnostic in patients with history of malignancy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Electrocardiografía , Neoplasias Cardíacas , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Neoplasias Renales , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Cardíacas/secundario , Neoplasias Cardíacas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografía TransesofágicaRESUMEN
Metastasis to the penis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or any other primary cancer site is unusual; when it does occur, it often involves multiple organs. A 75-year-old man presented with penile pain and swelling. Three months earlier, he had open radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy and was diagnosed with clear-cell RCC with tumor thrombosis in the inferior vena cava. The follow-up imaging indicated metastasis to the penis, prompting a total penectomy due to worsening pain. The excised mass displayed features consistent with metastatic RCC. This case underscores the need to consider rare metastatic sites, such as the metastasis of RCC to the penis, in RCC patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias del Pene , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias del Pene/secundario , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Nefrectomía , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pene/patología , Pene/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Despite rapid advances in targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bone metastases remain a major problem that significantly increases morbidity and reduces patients' quality of life. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CF-RT) is known to be an important local treatment option for bone metastases; however, bone metastases from RCC have traditionally been considered resistant to CF-RT. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of CF-RT for symptomatic bone metastasis from RCC and identify the predictive factors associated with treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2023, a total of 73 lesions in 50 patients treated with a palliative course of CF-RT for symptomatic bone metastasis from RCC were evaluated, and 62 lesions in 41 patients were included in this study. Forty-five lesions (72.6%) were treated using targeted therapy during CF-RT. The most common radiation dose fractionations were 30 gray (Gy) in 10 fractions (50%) and 39 Gy in 13 fractions (16.1%). Results: Pain relief was experienced in 51 of 62 lesions (82.3%), and the 12-month local control (LC) rate was 61.2%. Notably, 72.6% of the treatment course in this study was combined with targeted therapy. The 12-month LC rate was 74.8% in patients who received targeted therapy and only 10.9% in patients without targeted therapy (p < 0.001). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.026) and pain response (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of improved LC. Radiation dose escalation improved the LC in radiosensitive patients. A consistent treatment response was confirmed in patients with multiple treatment courses. Conclusions: CF-RT enhances pain relief and LC when combined with targeted therapy. Patients who responded well to initial treatment generally showed consistent responses to subsequent CF-RT for additional painful bone lesions. CF-RT could therefore be an excellent complementary local treatment modality for targeted therapy.