Association of Cutaneous Keloids, Hypertrophic Scarring, and Fibrosis with Risk of Postoperative Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.

PURPOSE: To assess an association between cutaneous keloids, hypertrophic scarring, and fibrosis (KHF) and risk of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent initial retinal detachment (RD) repair with pars plana vitrectomy with or without scleral buckle (SB) (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 67108), pneumatic retinopexy (67110), and primary SB (67107) from January 1, 2003, to March 1, 2023. METHODS: A de-identified electronic health record database through TriNetX, a global health research network, was used to analyze patients. Patients were queried for International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes L91.0 (hypertrophic scar) and L90.5 (scar conditions and fibrosis of skin). Frequency of subsequent diagnosis of PVR (H35.2) and CPT codes for secondary surgery including complex RD repair (67113) were determined. Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (ICD-10 H10.35/H11.35) were excluded. Descriptive statistics (Z-test) and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to match for age, sex, and race. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of H35.2 and CPT 67113 within 180 days after RRD repair in the KHF cohort versus the non-KHF cohort. RESULTS: Among patients with CPT 67108, 1061 in each cohort (KHF and non-KHF) were analyzed after PSM. The mean (standard deviation) age was 60.7 (15.2) years. Within 180 days, 10.1% of patients in the KHF cohort and 3.4% in the non-KHF cohort had a diagnosis of PVR (H35.2) (P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-4.71). A total of 8.3% of patients in the KHF cohort and 5.4% of patients in the non-KHF cohort underwent complex RD repair (CPT 67113) (P = 0.008; OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.13-2.25). When including all RD repair types (CPT 67108, 67110, 67107), the rate of PVR diagnosis was still significantly greater in the KHF cohort than in the non-KHF cohort (9.0% vs 4.2%, P < 0.01; OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.16). CONCLUSIONS: A dermatologic history of KHF may be a risk factor for PVR after RD repair. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Outcomes of dorsal nasal augmentation using costochondral graft.

Objective: To assess functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients having undergone dorsal nasal augmentation with costochondral graft in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: The single-centre, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, and comprised data of patients who underwent dorsal nasal augmentation using costochondral graft between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Aesthetic outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction were assessed using Facial Appearance, Health-related Quality of Life and Adverse Effects scores. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients, 28(61%) were males and 18(39%) were females. The overall mean age was 28.39±9.13 years. Dorsal nasal deficiency occurred secondary to congenital causes in 12(26.1%) patients, trauma 19(41.3%) and prior surgery 15(32.6%). Postoperative complication rate was 7(15%); 3(6.5%) had recipient site infection and 2(4.3%) had rib graft resorption. Besides, 1(2.2%) patient reported pain 2 months postoperatively and 1(2.2%) had hypertrophic scarring. Patient satisfaction with the outcome was noted in all the 10 parameters analysed. Most commonly reported problem was that the nose was 'looking thick/swollen' by 12(26.1%) patients, but the issue resolved during 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Costochondral graft was found to be an ideal material for dorsal nasal augmentation, with high patient satisfaction rate.

A Neglected Acne Scar Type: Papular Acne Scars and Their Correlations With Keloid Scars.

BACKGROUND: Acne scarring can be divided into 2 types: atrophic and hypertrophic scars. Papular acne scars are commonly encountered, skin-colored papules on the chin and back. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of each acne scar type and to investigate the clinical manifestations of papular acne scars. METHODS: This retrospective study included 416 patients with acne scars. Dermatologists classified the scars into 3 types (atrophic, papular, and keloid type) based on clinical photographs and analyzed the clinical and histologic features of papular acne scars. RESULTS: Among 416 patients with acne scars, 410 patients (98.56%) had atrophic scars, 53 patients (12.74%) had keloid scars, and 46 patients (11.06%) had papular acne scars. Twenty patients (4.81%) had both papular and keloid acne scars. Histologic analysis showed fibrotic tissue in both keloid and papular acne scars. Fibrosis of the papular scar was limited to the upper dermis. CONCLUSION: Papular acne scars were significantly more prevalent in patients with keloid scars than in those without keloid scars. These results provide a basis for understanding papular acne scars, which have been under-recognized. The association between papular and keloid acne scars can suggest the decision for scar treatment.

Factors Influencing Hypertrophic Scarring after Thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors of hypertrophic scarring (HS) after thyroidectomy and construct a risk prediction model. METHODS: From November 2018 to March 2019, the clinical data of patients undergoing thyroidectomy were collected for retrospective analysis. According to the occurrence of HS, the patients were divided into an HS group and a non-HS group. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were conducted to explore the independent risk factors for HS. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was also carried out. RESULTS: In this sample, 121 of 385 patients developed HS, an incidence of 31.4%. Univariate analysis showed significant differences in sex, age, postoperative infection, history of abnormal wound healing, history of pathologic scar, family history of pathologic scar, and scar prevention measures between the two groups (P < .05). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that age 45 years or younger (odds ratio [OR], 1.815), history of abnormal wound healing (OR, 4.247), history of pathologic scarring (OR, 9.840), family history of pathologic scarring (OR, 5.708), and absence of preventive scar measures (OR, 5.566) were independent factors for HS after thyroidectomy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.837. When the optimal diagnostic cutoff value was 0.206, the sensitivity was 0.661, and the specificity was 0.932. CONCLUSIONS: The development of HS after thyroidectomy is related to many factors, and the proposed risk prediction model based on the combined risk factors shows a good predictive value for postoperative HS. When researchers consider the prevention and treatment of scarring in patients at risk, the incidence of HS in different populations can provide theoretical support for clinical decision-making.

Safety assessment of the prophylactic use of silicone gel sheets (Lady Care®) for the prevention of hypertrophic scars following caesarean section.

This study aimed to investigate the side effects of silicone gel sheet (Lady Care®) and evaluate its prophylactic efficacy in preventing abnormal scarring. Sixty women who underwent caesarean section were recruited from September 2016 to September 2017 in this prospective study. Lady Care® was applied from the 2nd to the 6th postoperative months. Side effects of Lady Care® were evaluated through medical examinations and questionnaires. A plastic surgeon diagnosed abnormal scarring. Pruritus was diagnosed in 25 (47.2%) patients; folliculitis, four (7.5%); dry skin, four (7.5%); contact dermatitis, three (5.7%); wound infection, two (3.8%); and epidermolysis, one (1.9%), albeit with mild severity. Following Lady Care® application, no abnormal scarring and mild hypertrophic scarring was observed in 32 (64.0%) and 18 (36.0%) patients respectively. Of seven patients with pre-existing hypertrophic scars, only two showed hypertrophic scarring after Lady Care® application. Our findings support the safety and prophylactic efficacy of Lady Care®.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The incidence of abnormal scarring, i.e. keloid or hypertrophic scar formation after caesarean section (CS) is reported to be ∼41%. Abnormal or excessive scar formation can lead to functional limitations, pruritus, pain and cosmetic issues. Studies have also shown a prophylactic effect of the application of silicone materials against the development of hypertrophic and keloid scars, though prohibitive cost and lack of adhesiveness of such gel sheets are known factors limiting their usage.What the results of this study add? The new silicone gel sheet 'Lady Care®' has strong adhesive properties and is consequently not easily peeled off. Furthermore, it is easy to use and economically efficient.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This is the first clinical trial on the application of Lady Care® silicone gel sheet for the prevention of CS scarring. Our findings support the safety and prophylactic efficacy of Lady Care®.

The integrative regulatory network of circRNA and microRNA in keloid scarring.

Circular RNA (circRNA), a novel type of non-coding RNA that consists of a circular loop, has been demonstrated to act as a "sponge" for microRNAs (miRNAs). However, the role of circRNAs in keloid remains unknown. In this study, we investigated circRNA expression profiles in keloid to identify potential diagnostic and therapeutic circRNAs. We performed a circRNA microarray assay to determine circRNA expression in keloid and paired normal skin tissues. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate the expression levels of candidate circRNAs. The most significantly over-expressed circRNA was used to predict putative miRNA targets and the binding sites of miRNAs with this circRNA. Finally, we constructed a circRNA-miRNA interaction network and carried out gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. We found 52 significantly upregulated and 24 downregulated circRNAs in keloid compared with normal skin tissue. We confirmed that hsa_circ_0057452, hsa_circ_0007482, hsa_circ_0020792, hsa_circ_0057342, and hsa_circ_0043688 were significantly upregulated in keloid tissues. Analysis of the circRNA-miRNA interaction network revealed that circRNAs could interact with miRNAs, including miRNA-29a, miRNA-23a-5p and miRNA-1976. GO and KEGG analyses indicated that these target genes were involved in biological functions and signaling pathways that may play vital roles in the pathogenesis of keloid. This study revealed that circRNAs are potentially implicated in the development of keloid and could serve as novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets.

Correction and Prevention of the Pixie Ear Deformity: A Combined Technique.

Background: Ear and earlobe deformities after surgical rhytidectomy are common and can significantly diminish the aesthetic outcome. The main causes of ear/earlobe distortion are skin overresection, an imbalance between vertical/horizontal skin-lift vectors, and tractional distortions through superficial muscularaponeurotic system (SMAS) tension. Objectives: To demonstrate a new method for earlobe suturing and ear fixation that would prevent aesthetics-related complications after facelift surgery. Methods: A total of 105 primary SMAS facelift surgeries were performed between 2015 and 2016 by the first author. A combination technique consisting of a posterior earlobe rotation flap (PERF) and a concha-mastoid suspension suture (CMSS) was executed bilaterally within each facelift procedure (n = 210). A retrospective data analysis was conducted (preoperatively and one year postoperatively) using our hospital information system and a photometric data analysis to assess auricular displacement, earlobe distortion, and hypertrophic scarring. Results: Pseudoptosis of the earlobe was noted in two cases, and auricular displacement was observed in four cases. Bilateral mild hypertrophic scarring was seen in one patient. The postoperative photometric analysis showed a natural ptosis grade I/II in all the patients, with a statistically significantly reduced postoperative earlobe size (P < 0.05). The total rate of aesthetics-related complications was 4% in our cohort (earlobe distortion with pseudoptosis: 1%; auricular displacement: 2%; hypertrophic scarring: 1%). Conclusions: Our modification of the facial flap anchoring at the ear base in combination with a CMSS stabilizes the natural position of the ear and prevents distortion while allowing better control over the earlobe's aesthetic shaping. This novel method reduces the incidence of ear/earlobe deformities and hypertrophic scarring at the ear base after rhytidectomy and, therefore, promises to be a valuable advancement.

Going into surgery: Risk factors for hypertrophic scarring.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between possible risk factors for excessive scarring and the formation of hypertrophic scars (HTS). Hypertrophic skin scarring remains a difficult problem in medicine and can cause considerable morbidity. Nevertheless, few extensive prospective studies have been conducted which assess risk factors in relation to HTS formation. Therefore, a prospective observational study was performed. Patients who had elective cardiothoracic surgery were followed for the duration of 1 year and information was collected about a variety of possible risk factors in these patients. The associations between the risk factors and the development of HTSs were investigated. Body mass index, ethnic background, and scar related factors are positively associated with HTS formation. Antihypertensive therapeutics and factors influencing erythropoiesis are negatively associated with HTS formation.

Intralesional triamcinolone alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and its combination with 5 flourouracil in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars in terms of reduction in initial height of the scar. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Plastic Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, from March 2011 to December 2012. It comprised patients of both genders having keloids or hypertrophic scars (1 cm to 5 cm in size) having no history of treatment for the scars in preceding 6 months. Those who were pregnant, planning pregnancy or lactating were excluded. The subjects were divided into two groups: Group A received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone; and Group B received triamcinolone acetonide + 5 flourouracil. Eight injections were given at weekly interval. Scars were assessed 4 weeks after the completion of treatment on a five-point scale. SPSS 16 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The 150 subjects in the study were divided into two equal groups of 75 (50%) each. Good to excellent results were seen in 51 (68%) cases in Group A compared to 63 (84%) in Group B. Frequency of complications was 18 (24%) and 6 (8%) in Group A and Group B respectively. CONCLUSION: Combination of triamcinolone acetonide and 5 flourouracil is superior to triamcinolone acetonide therapy in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

The impact of burn injuries on indigenous populations: A literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Ethnic minorities experience disparities in prevention and treatment of burn injury. Research focused on burn injuries in Indigenous populations is limited. This review summarizes literature on burn injuries in Indigenous populations to be considered to inform new research. METHODS: A search was conducted in CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PSYCinfo and SocINDEX. for "burn OR scars OR scald OR deformity OR disfigurement" and "Aboriginal OR Indigenous OR First Nation OR American Indian OR Maori OR Native OR Torres Strait Islander OR Amerindian OR Inuit OR Metis OR Pacific Islander". Inclusion 1) peer reviewed studies of burns in Indigenous persons 2) in English. Exclusion 1) no data specific to Indigenous burns 2) not peer reviewed 3) not in full text 4) protocol publications. RESULTS: The search identified 1091 studies with 51 for review. Sixteen were excluded. The 35 included publications were published between 1987 and 2022. Findings indicated higher incidence of injury and poorer outcomes amongst Indigenous people. Indigenous people suffered more flame and inhalation burns, had longer lengths of stay, and more complications including hypertrophic scarring. Australian Indigenous patients struggle with a lack of culturally safe communication and support for aftercare. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities exist in burn injury incidence and outcome for Indigenous persons. Qualitative research in this area will help providers better understand the experiences of Indigenous burn patients to develop more culturally competent care. We are currently developing a study using qualitative hermeneutic methodology to learn about the experiences of Indigenous burn survivors' injuries, recovery, and social reintegration.