Safety of audiology direct access for medicare patients complaining of impaired hearing.

BACKGROUND: Allowing Medicare beneficiaries to self-refer to audiologists for evaluation of hearing loss has been advocated as a cost-effective service delivery model. Resistance to audiology direct access is based, in part, on the concern that audiologists might miss significant otologic conditions. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative safety of audiology direct access by comparing the treatment plans of audiologists and otolaryngologists in a large group of Medicare-eligible patients seeking hearing evaluation. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study comparing assessment and treatment plans developed by audiologists and otolaryngologists. STUDY SAMPLE: 1550 records comprising all Medicare eligible patients referred to the Audiology Section of the Mayo Clinic Florida in 2007 with a primary complaint of hearing impairment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Assessment and treatment plans were compiled from the electronic medical record and placed in a secured database. Records of patients seen jointly by audiology and otolaryngology practitioners (Group 1: 352 cases) were reviewed by four blinded reviewers, two otolaryngologists and two audiologists, who judged whether the audiologist treatment plan, if followed, would have missed conditions identified and addressed in the otolaryngologist's treatment plan. Records of patients seen by audiology but not otolaryngology (Group 2: 1198 cases) were evaluated by a neurotologist who judged whether the patient should have seen an otolaryngologist based on the audiologist's documentation and test results. Additionally, the audiologist and reviewing neurotologist judgments about hearing asymmetry were compared to two mathematical measures of hearing asymmetry (Charing Cross and AAO-HNS [American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery] calculations). RESULTS: In the analysis of Group 1 records, the jury of four judges found no audiology discrepant treatment plans in over 95% of cases. In no case where a judge identified a discrepancy in treatment plans did the audiologist plan risk missing conditions associated with significant mortality or morbidity that were subsequently identified by the otolaryngologist. In the analysis of Group 2 records, the neurotologist judged that audiology services alone were all that was required in 78% of cases. An additional 9% of cases were referred for subsequent medical evaluation. The majority of remaining patients had hearing asymmetries. Some were evaluated by otolaryngology for hearing asymmetry in the past with no interval changes, and others were consistent with noise exposure history. In 0.33% of cases, unexplained hearing asymmetry was potentially missed by the audiologist. Audiologists and the neurotologist demonstrated comparable accuracy in identifying Charing Cross and AAO-HNS pure-tone asymmetries. CONCLUSIONS: Of study patients evaluated for hearing problems in the one-year period of this study, the majority (95%) ultimately required audiological services, and in most of these cases, audiological services were the only hearing health-care services that were needed. Audiologist treatment plans did not differ substantially from otolaryngologist plans for the same condition; there was no convincing evidence that audiologists missed significant symptoms of otologic disease; and there was strong evidence that audiologists referred to otolaryngology when appropriate. These findings are consistent with the premise that audiology direct access would not pose a safety risk to Medicare beneficiaries complaining of hearing impairment.

The importance of audiologic red flags in patient management decisions.

BACKGROUND: It is essential that nonbenign forms of hearing impairment are recognized and addressed before audiological management is entertained. PURPOSE: To present an illustrative case and focused literature review of early red flag indicators for retrocochlear impairment, as might be discerned from a patient's history or physical examination. RESULTS: The presenting history and clinical course of a female patient with fatal adenocarcinoma presenting as a suspected retrocochlear mass is reviewed over the last four months of her life. Clinical signs, symptoms and test results pointing to the diagnosis of "acoustic neuroma" and then "metastatic neoplasm" are reviewed along with selected supporting reference literature. The ambiguous clinical pictures at various points in her history are analyzed, with an effort to point out how early audiological decisions may significantly impact patient's overall health. CONCLUSIONS: Clear communication with primary care physicians, vigilance when audiological results are ambiguous for active disease, and pre-established referral relationships with practitioners in the neurologic and otologic disciplines are stressed as important requirements for audiologists who serve as entry points into hearing healthcare.

Retrocochlear impairments in systemic sclerosis: a case report study. / Alterações retrococleares na esclerose sistêmica: relato de casos.

PURPOSE: To report three cases of patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and retrocochlear impairments. METHODS: This is a case report of three individuals with SSc and retrocochlear impairments assisted at a rheumatology outpatient clinic. All individuals underwent Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential (BAEP) and, when necessary, audiometry. RESULTS: All three individuals presented sensorineural hearing loss. Although no retrocochlear impairment was identified in the basic audiologic evaluation, the BAEP results were altered. CONCLUSION: Retrocochlear impairments were present in the individuals under study, both in the absolute latencies and interpeak interval, thereby demanding the attention of rheumatologists and speech-language pathologists to such changes during the monitoring of SSc patients. The results also show a need for epidemiological studies on the theme.

OBJETIVO: Relatar três casos de pacientes portadores de Esclerose Sistêmica e que apresentaram alterações retrococleares. MÉTODO: Trata-se de um estudo de relato de casos de três indivíduos com esclerose sistêmica e alteração retrococlear, acompanhados em um serviço de reumatologia. Todos os pacientes realizaram o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico e, quando necessário, nova audiometria. RESULTADOS: Todos os indivíduos apresentaram perda auditiva do tipo sensorioneural. Não foi identificado na avaliação audiológica básica qualquer resultado que sugerisse alteração retrococlear, porém o PEATE apresentou-se alterado. CONCLUSÃO: Pode-se concluir que o estudo revela alterações retrococleares nesta população, ocorrendo tanto nas latências absolutas quanto no intervalo interpico. E, neste contexto, reumatologistas e fonoaudiólogos, ao acompanharem pacientes com esclerose sistêmica, devem estar atentos para a possibilidade da ocorrência dessa alteração nessa população. Revela também, a necessidade de estudos epidemiológicos sobre o tema.

Alterações retrococleares na esclerose sistêmica: relato de casos / Retrocochlear impairments in systemic sclerosis: a case report study

RESUMO Objetivo Relatar três casos de pacientes portadores de Esclerose Sistêmica e que apresentaram alterações retrococleares. Método Trata-se de um estudo de relato de casos de três indivíduos com esclerose sistêmica e alteração retrococlear, acompanhados em um serviço de reumatologia. Todos os pacientes realizaram o Potencial Evocado Auditivo de Tronco Encefálico e, quando necessário, nova audiometria. Resultados Todos os indivíduos apresentaram perda auditiva do tipo sensorioneural. Não foi identificado na avaliação audiológica básica qualquer resultado que sugerisse alteração retrococlear, porém o PEATE apresentou-se alterado. Conclusão Pode-se concluir que o estudo revela alterações retrococleares nesta população, ocorrendo tanto nas latências absolutas quanto no intervalo interpico. E, neste contexto, reumatologistas e fonoaudiólogos, ao acompanharem pacientes com esclerose sistêmica, devem estar atentos para a possibilidade da ocorrência dessa alteração nessa população. Revela também, a necessidade de estudos epidemiológicos sobre o tema.

ABSTRACT Purpose To report three cases of patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and retrocochlear impairments. Methods This is a case report of three individuals with SSc and retrocochlear impairments assisted at a rheumatology outpatient clinic. All individuals underwent Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential (BAEP) and, when necessary, audiometry. Results All three individuals presented sensorineural hearing loss. Although no retrocochlear impairment was identified in the basic audiologic evaluation, the BAEP results were altered. Conclusion Retrocochlear impairments were present in the individuals under study, both in the absolute latencies and interpeak interval, thereby demanding the attention of rheumatologists and speech-language pathologists to such changes during the monitoring of SSc patients. The results also show a need for epidemiological studies on the theme.

[Auditory brainstem responses evaluation of retrocochlear disease in workers from a general hospital exposed to noise]. / Aplicação da audiometria troncoencefálica na detecção de perdas auditivas retrococleares em trabalhadores de manutenção hospitalar expostos a ruído.

The main purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the presence of retrocochlear disease in a group of maintenance workers from a general hospital, who presents a history of noise exposure. Thirty one workers of three engineering sections with age range from 25 to 60 years and continuous noise exposure from 2 and 45 years, were examined. The evaluation included an audiometric occupational selection and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). ABR abnormalities were detected in seven patients (22.6%) and it was found latency increase of waves III (14.3%) and V (28.6%), and interpeak prolongation I-III (71.4%), III-V (28.6%) and I-V (85.7%). Among 35 ears with normal audition - right, left or both -, four (11,4%) ears presented retrocochlear disease. The high retrocochlear disease prevalence in workers exposed to noise lead us to suppose that this disturbance is more frequent than usually found; therefore it is underestimated in workers diagnostic evaluation. The presence of this kind of disturbance, even with the absence of audiometric alterations, suggests that ABR is more sensitive than the tonal audiometry for noise induced hearing loss investigation.

Aplicação da audiometria troncoencefálica na detecção de perdas auditivas retrococleares em trabalhadores de manutenção hospitalar expostos a ruído / Auditory brainstem responses evaluation of retrocochlear disease in workers from a general hospital exposed to noise

O objetivo principal deste estudo seccional foi averiguar a presença de comprometimento auditivo retrococlear num grupo de trabalhadores de manutenção de um hospital de grande porte com histórico de exposição a ruído. Foram avaliados 31 trabalhadores de três setores da divisão de engenharia entre 25 e 60 anos e com exposição contínua a ruído entre 2 e 45 anos. O processo avaliativo contou com triagem audiométrica ocupacional e audiometria troncoencefálica (ATE). Foram detectadas anormalidades na ATE em sete pacientes (22,6 por cento), caracterizadas por aumento de latências de ondas III (14,3 por cento) e V (28,6 por cento); prolongamento dos interpicos I-III (71,4 por cento), III-V (28,6 por cento) e I-V (85,7 por cento). Das 35 orelhas com audição normal (três unilateralmente e 32 bilateralmente), quatro (11,4 por cento) apresentaram comprometimento retrococlear. A alta prevalência de comprometimento retrococlear no grupo induz supor que tal distúrbio seja mais frequente que o encontrado e esteja sendo subestimado na investigação diagnóstica desses trabalhadores. A ocorrência desses resultados sem a presença de alterações audiométricas sugere que a ATE seja mais sensível que a audiometria tonal na investigação de perda auditiva provocada por ruído, por isso sua utilização deva ser incentivada.

The main purpose of this cross-seccional study was to investigate the presence of retrocochlear disease in a group of maintenance workers from a general hospital, who presents a history of noise exposure. Thirty one workers of three engineering sections with age range from 25 to 60 years and continuous noise exposure from 2 and 45 years, were examined. The evaluation included an audiometric occupational selection and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). ABR abnormalities were detected in seven patients (22.6 percent) and it was found latency increase of waves III (14.3 percent) and V (28.6 percent), and interpeak prolongation I-III (71.4 percent), III-V (28.6 percent) and I-V (85.7 percent). Among 35 ears with normal audition right, left or both , four (11,4 percent) ears presented retrocochlear disease. The high retrocochlear disease prevalence in workers exposed to noise lead us to suppose that this disturbance is more frequent than usually found; therefore it is underestimated in workers diagnostic evaluation. The presence of this kind of disturbance, even with the absence of audiometric alterations, suggests that ABR is more sensitive than the tonal audiometry for noise induced hearing loss investigation.