Differential clinical features and long-term prognosis of acute aortic syndrome according to disease entity.

AIMS: To evaluate the acute and long-term prognosis of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) according to the disease entity [intramural haematoma (IMH) vs. aortic dissection (AD)] and the anatomical location (type A vs. B). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1012 patients [672 with AD and 340 with IMH (33.6%)] were enrolled between 1993 and 2015. Compared with AD patients, IMH patients were older and had higher frequency of female sex and distal aorta involvement. The overall crude in-hospital mortality of AAS was 8.6%; type A AD [15.0%; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 30.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.62-107.3; P < 0.001], type A IMH (8.0%; aHR 4.85; 95% CI 1.29-18.2; P = 0.019), type B AD (5.0%; aHR 3.51; 95% CI 1.00-12.4; P = 0.051), and type B IMH [1.5%; aHR 1.00 (reference)]. During a median follow-up duration of 8.5 years (interquartile range: 4.0-13.5 years), AD (aHR 2.78; 95% CI 1.87-4.14; P < 0.001) and type A (aHR 2.28; 95% CI 1.45-3.58; P < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of aortic death. After 90 days, a risk of aortic death was no longer associated with anatomical location (aHR 0.74; 95% CI 0.40-1.36; P = 0.33), but remained associated with disease entity (aHR 1.83; 95% CI 1.10-3.04; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The clinical features, response to treatment strategy, and outcomes of IMH patients were distinct from those of AD patients. Both early and late survival was better for IMH than for AD. In addition to the anatomical location of AAS, the disease entity is an independent factor associated with both acute and long-term mortality in patients with AAS. Further investigation is necessary to confirm the prognostic implication of disease entity in different patient populations.

Acute Aortic Syndromes: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways.

Acute aortic syndromes are life-threatening medical conditions that include classic acute aortic dissection (AAD), aortic intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcer, and even aortic pseudoaneurysm and traumatic aortic injury. The European Society of Cardiology has designed a multiparametric diagnostic algorithm to provide stepwise diagnosis. All patients with AAD should receive aggressive medical therapy to control blood pressure and heart rate. Urgent surgical repair is recommended for type A AAD. Uncomplicated type B AAD requires aggressive medical therapy. In contrast thoracic endovascular repair is recommended for complicated type B. AAD should be considered a lifelong disease that affects the entire aorta.

Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update.

Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) encompass a constellation of life-threatening medical conditions including classic acute aortic dissection (AAD), intramural haematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer. Given the non-specific symptoms and physical signs, a high clinical index of suspicion is necessary to detect the disease before irreversible lethal complications occur. In order to reduce the diagnostic time delay, a comprehensive flowchart for decision-making based on pre-test sensitivity of AAS has been designed by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on aortic diseases and should be thus applied in the emergency scenario. When the definitive diagnosis is made, prompt and appropriate therapeutic interventions should be undertaken if indicated by a highly specialized aortic team. Urgent surgery for AAD involving the ascending aorta (Type A) and medical therapy alone for AAD not involving the ascending aorta (Type B) are typically recommended. In complicated Type B AAD, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is generally indicated. On the other hand, in uncomplicated Type B AAD, pre-emptive TEVAR rather than medical therapy alone to prevent late complications, while intuitive, requires further study in randomized cohorts. Finally, it should be highlighted that there is an urgent need to increase awareness of AAS worldwide, including dedicated education/prevention programmes, and to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, outcomes, and lifelong surveillance.

[Imaging approach to acute aortic syndrome]. / Estudio imagenológico del síndrome aórtico agudo.

Acute aortic syndromes include a spectrum of life-threatening aortic conditions. A review of the diagnostic aspects of the acute aortic syndrome was made, from the perspective of the imaging techniques available for this purpose. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique and its diagnostic performance were evaluated. Emphasis was placed on the relevance of clinical information as a fundamental tool for suspecting this syndrome and appropriately choosing the imaging technique. Our main objective is to provide information about the diagnosis of this condition, especially in the context of emergency services.

Analysis of risk factors and classification of aortic fistula after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Aortic fistula after esophagectomy is a rare and serious complication. The aims of this study were to describe the causes of and classify the fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2017, a total of 1018 patients underwent esophageal resection, mainly for esophageal cancer; aortic fistula after esophagectomy was diagnosed in four patients. We perform a literature review through a database search for similar cases. Aortic fistulas may be classified into two types based on the site at which they occur in relation to the alimentary tract and area of anastomosis. Type 1 fistula occurs within the area of anastomosis, whereas type 2 fistula occurs above or below the anastomosis. The risk factors and clinical features associated with aortic fistulas are described, and comparison between the two types is made. RESULTS: Through a literature search, 39 cases were identified, of which 26 cases were classified as type 1, and 13 cases were classified as type 2. Of 13 patients (33.3%) who underwent emergent intervention, seven patients survived. Approximately 76.9% of aortic fistula were related to anastomotic fistula, which was more prevalent in type 1 aortic fistula than in type 2 (92% versus 50%, P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, side of thoracotomy, type of anastomosis, the postoperative day the hemorrhage occurred, warning hemorrhage, chest pain, or the outcome between the two types of fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Anastomotic fistula is the primary cause of type 1 aortic fistula after esophagectomy, and early diagnosis and intervention of aortic fistula can improve prognosis. This classification may be a useful guide in determining the approach for second-stage alimentary tract reconstruction.

[Infiltration of Cardiac Vessels by Lung Cancer: Incidence, Classification, Operative Technique with Heart Lung Bypass, and Results]. / Infiltration der herznahen Gefäße durch Lungenkarzinome: Inzidenz, Klassifikationen, operative Technik unter Einsatz der Herz-Lungen-Maschine und Ergebnisse.

Carcinomas of the lung that infiltrate the blood vessels close to the heart (left atrium, pulmonary artery and aorta) without spreading to mediastinal lymph nodes or developing distant metastases are rare overall. Such situations are often classified as primarily inoperable by interdisciplinary tumour boards. This is only the case if, for technical reasons, an experienced thoracic surgeon does not feel able to perform a resection with a surrounding margin of healthy tissue. The surgical strategy to be employed must be chosen individually depending on the infiltrated structure. Complete tumour staging should always be carried out. This also helps in deciding whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given before resection. A heart-lung machine must always be used if larger defects occur due to the resection of blood vessels close to the heart. Using a heart-lung machine in the case of tumour resection does not lead to problems of tumour cell dissemination. Nevertheless, the duration of use of the heart-lung machine should be kept to a minimum, also because of the anticoagulation required. The cardiac defects can be closed securely with the bovine patching materials that are now available. Postoperative morbidity and mortality are low after such resections. Curative resection of blood vessels close to the heart infiltrated by carcinomas of the lung can lead to 5-year survival rates of up to 50 %.

Early and Long-term Outcome after Open Surgical Suprarenal Aortic Fenestration in Patients with Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the early and long-term mortality and morbidity as well as to reveal risk factors influencing the long-term prognosis in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection (CABAD) undergoing open surgical suprarenal aortic fenestration (OSSAF). METHODS: Fifty-two patients with CABAD, defined as (impending) rupture, acute enlargement of the false lumen, malperfusion, and/or unrelenting back pain or uncontrollable hypertension despite maximum medical therapy were treated with by surgical repair between 2002 and 2008. Ten patients with (impending) rupture had aortic graft replacement, while 42 (33 men, mean age 55 ± 11 years) had OSSAF. Follow up visits were scheduled at 1, 3-6 and 12 months after the surgery and annually thereafter. Clinical examination and computed tomography angiography findings were investigated at baseline and at subsequent visits. RESULTS: The indications for OSSAF were acute enlargement of the false lumen in four (10%), malperfusion in 17 (40%) (11 lower extremity [26%], 6 visceral [14%]), and unrelenting back pain or uncontrollable hypertension in 21 cases (50%). The 30 day mortality was 21.4% (2 multiple organ failure, 2 heart failure, 3 pneumonia, 1 intestinal necrosis, 1 major hemorrhage). The mean follow up was 84 ± 40 months. The 5 year survival was 70.6%. Eight patients (19%) died during the follow up period (6 aortic ruptures, 2 myocardial infarctions). None of the patients became paraplegic after the surgery. Further surgery or stenting was indicated in nine cases (21%). CONCLUSIONS: OSSAF has been performed with an acceptable early mortality and low paraplegia rate, but late mortality is frequently related to aortic rupture. Stentgraft coverage of the primary entry tear decreases late aortic related deaths, but suprarenal fenestration remains an option for cases not suitable for endovascular techniques.

[Acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult - 2014 AS SMC Guidelines on the classification and diagnosis of aortic diseases]. / Akútne a chronické aortové choroby hrudníkovej a brusnej aorty u dospelýchOdporúcania Angiologickej sekcie Slovenskej lekárskej komory pre klasifikáciu a diagnózu chorôb aorty (AS SLK, 2014).

In addition to organovascular arterial ischemic diseases (cardiovascular, vasculovascular, neurovascular, extre-mitovascular, renovascular, genitovascular, bronchopulmovascular, mesenteriovascular, osteoarthromusculovascular, dermovascular, oculovascular, otovascular, stomatovascular etc.), aortic diseases contribute to the wide spectrum of arterial diseases: aortic aneurysms (AA), acute aortic syndromes (AAS) including aortic dissection (AD), intramural haematoma (IMH), penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) and traumatic aortic injury (TAI), pseudoaneurysm, aortic rupture, atherosclerosis, vasculitis as well as genetic diseases (e.g. Turner syndrome, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) and congenital abnormalities including the coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Similarly to other arterial diseases, aortic diseases may be diagnosed after a long period of subclinical development or they may have an acute presentation. Acute aortic syndrome is often the first sign of the disease, which needs rapid diagnosis and decisionmaking to reduce the extremely poor prognosis. Key clinical-etiology-anatomy-patophysiology (CEAP) diagnostic aspects of aortic diseases are discussed in this document (project Vessels).

The cardiovascular pathologist in the aortic team.

Aortic diseases require a multidisciplinary management for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up with better outcomes in referral centers using a team-based approach. The setting up of a multi-disciplinary aortic team for the discussion of complex cases has been already proposed; it is also supported by the ACC/AHA. Surgeons and radiologists, more or less other physicians such as cardiologists, geneticists, rheumatologists/internal medicine specialists and pathologists are involved into such a team. The role of the cardiovascular pathologist is to examine the aortic specimens, to diagnose and classify the aortic lesions. Herein, the role of the pathologist in the aortic team is discussed and the pathobiology of aortic diseases is reviewed for reference by pathologists. The aortic specimens are mainly obtained from emergency or elective surgical procedures on the thoracic aorta, less frequently from organ/tissue (including cardiac or heart valve) donors, post-mortem procedures or abdominal aortic surgery. In the last decade, together with the progress of medical sciences, the histological definitions and classifications of the aortic pathology are undergoing thorough revisions that are addressed to an etiopathogenetic approach because of possible clinico-pathological correlations, therapeutic and prognostic impact. Pathologists may also have an important role in research and teaching. Therefore, histological analyses of the aortic specimens require adequate sample processing and pathologist expertise because histology contributes to definite diagnosis, correct management of patients and even (in genetic diseases) families, but also to research in the challenging field of aortopathies.

Not all porcelain is the same: classification of circular aortic calcifications (porcelain aorta) according to the impact on therapeutic approach.

Severe aortic calcification, also known as "porcelain aorta," has a major impact on patient outcome. Its presence also influences the choice of procedure depending on where it is located. However, to date there is no clear definition on how this term should be employed, being often used as an exclusion criteria for conventional surgery where aortic clamping and/or cannulation is required.We here suggest a classification of the "porcelain aorta" regarding its location and how it influences particular therapeutic options. Therefore, making more clear what procedures would represent an increased risk for the patient and which are more suitable when discussed in a "Heart Team."Type I implies localization of a circumferential calcification in the ascending aorta. Type IA represents the calcified aorta with no possibility of clamping and Type IB represents the calcified aorta with possible clamping. Type II addresses the calcification of the descending aorta including or not the aortic arch.

Prevalence of and risk factors for autopsy-determined atherosclerosis among US service members, 2001-2011.

CONTEXT: Autopsies of US service members killed in the Korean and Vietnam wars demonstrated that atherosclerotic changes in the coronary arteries can appear early in the second and third decades of life, long before ischemic heart disease becomes clinically apparent. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the current prevalence of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis in the US armed forces. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of all US service members who died of combat or unintentional injuries in support of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom/New Dawn between October 2001 and August 2011 and whose cardiovascular autopsy reports were available at the time of data collection in January 2012. Prevalence of atherosclerosis was analyzed by various demographic characteristics and medical history. Classifications of coronary atherosclerosis severity were determined prior to data analysis and designed to provide consistency with previous military studies: minimal (fatty streaking only), moderate (10%-49% luminal narrowing of ≥1 vessel), and severe (≥50% narrowing of ≥1 vessel). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis in the US armed forces and by age, sex, self-reported race/ethnicity, education, occupation, service branch and component, military rank, body mass index at military entrance, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnoses of cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 3832 service members included in the analysis, the mean age was 25.9 years (range, 18-59 years) and 98.3% were male. The prevalence of any coronary atherosclerosis was 8.5% (95% CI, 7.6%-9.4%); severe coronary atherosclerosis was present in 2.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-2.7%), moderate in 4.7% (95% CI, 4.0%-5.3%), and minimal in 1.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%). Service members with atherosclerosis were significantly older (mean [SD] age, 30.5 [8.1] years) than those without (mean [SD] age, 25.3 [5.6] years; P < .001). Comparing atherosclerosis prevalence among with those with no cardiovascular risk factor diagnoses (11.1% [95% CI, 10.1%-12.1%]), there was a greater prevalence among those with a diagnosis of dyslipidemia (50.0% [95% CI, 30.3%-69.7%]; age-adjusted prevalence ratio [PR], 2.09 [95% CI, 1.43-3.06]), hypertension (43.6% [95% CI, 27.3%-59.9%]; age-adjusted PR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.34-2.65]), or obesity (22.3% [95% CI, 15.9%-28.7%]; age-adjusted PR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.10-1.96]), but smoking (14.1% [95% CI, 8.0%-20.2%]) was not significantly associated with a higher prevalence of atherosclerosis (age-adjusted PR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.73-1.74]). CONCLUSION: Among deployed US service members who died of combat or unintentional injuries and received autopsies, the prevalence of atherosclerosis varied by age and cardiovascular risk factors.

[Aorto-enteric fistula: an interdisciplinary practical approach]. / Ein praktischer Ansatz zur interdisziplinären Therapie der aorto-enteralen Fistel.

Aorto-enteric fistulas (AEF) are a rare but often -fatal complication. The primary diagnosis of AEF remains difficult. Computed tomography and FDG-PET / CT (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography) are the diagnostic tools of choice. Therapy consists of an urgent individual interdisciplinary surgical approach with primary axillo-femoral bypass and secondary prosthesis explantation or in situ replacement and consecutive bowel resection. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is reserved for primary -aorto-enteric fistulas in patients without signs of infection or in emergency cases as a bridging meth-od. A systematic review of the literature from 1990 to 2009 was performed by medline -research (pubmed) to analyse diagnostic and treatment strategies for aorto-enteric fistulas. A practical, interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm was created in accordance with the analysed results.

Summary: International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional, and research purposes.

This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes.

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

[Type A acute aortic syndromes: Assessment of the management delays in an emergency medicine network]. / Syndromes aortiques aigus de type A : évaluation des délais de prise en charge dans un réseau de médecine d'urgence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic delay (between first hospital medical contact and diagnosis) and the surgical delay (between diagnosis and incision) of type A acute aortic syndromes (AAAS) within the RENAU (REseau Nord Alpin des Urgences), organizing the management of emergency medicine care in the French North Alpine Arc. PROCEDURE: Multicenter retrospective study between 2012 and 2016 on the AAAS operated in the RENAU heart surgical centers (Annecy, Grenoble). Post-traumatic, iatrogenic or chronic lesions, incidental discoveries and deaths before surgery were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients were included with a median age [IQR] of 65 years [58; 73] of which 67% were men. The median diagnosis delay was 88min [46;241] and the median surgical delay was 193min [146;249]. Initial management was performed by the SMUR for 102 patients (52%), 7% of whom received a pre-hospital transthoracic ultrasound. 52 patients (26%) presented themselves spontaneously to the emergency department. Patients were initially admitted in a center without cardiac surgery in 65% of cases. The CT scan was the diagnostic test in 81% of cases. The postoperative hospital mortality was 16%. CONCLUSION: Referring to IRAD data reporting a median diagnostic and surgical delay of 258min each, our study suggests that the RENAU organization may be associated with reduced diagnostic and surgical delays for patients with SAAA.

Regional and Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Repairs for Acute Type A Aortic Dissections.

BACKGROUND: Little information exists regarding the use of arch operations for repair of acute type A aortic dissections (AADs) despite increasing interest in this strategy and its potential impact on outcomes. We aimed to determine the relationship between extent of aortic repair, US geographic regions, and outcome. METHODS: We queried The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for patients who underwent AAD repair from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2016 and grouped patients by ascending-only operations and operations involving the arch. RESULTS: We identified 25,462 patients (mean age, 59.8 ± 14.2; 66.7% men) who underwent AAD repair. Operations involving the ascending aorta only were performed in 54% of patients; 46% had repair additionally involving the arch. The 30-day mortality was 18.9% for patients who underwent ascending-only operations vs 19.8% for patients who underwent arch operations (P = .09). In multivariable analysis older age (P < .001), earlier year of operation (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P < .001), severe chronic lung disease (P < .001), prior cerebrovascular disease (P < .001), and longer bypass time (P < .001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. There was regional variation in 30-day mortality (P < .001), and incidence of arch repair varied from 38.6% to 52.6% in 9 geographic regions (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of cardiac surgical practice in the United States, repair of AADs included a portion of the aortic arch in 46% of patients. Early mortality remained high throughout the current era regardless of extent of aortic resection. Regional variation in perioperative mortality may signal an opportunity for practice improvement.

Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, aortic, and outcome characteristics of type A aortic dissection patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). METHODS: Patient characteristics and radiographic, operative, and outcome data were evaluated and compared between 1068 TAV patients and 72 BAV patients operated on for type A aortic dissection in 2 centers. Predissection aortic diameters were calculated as previously reported for TAV patients. RESULTS: BAV patients were significantly younger (P < .001) and had a lower incidence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although the clinical presentation was similar, the dissection affected the abdominal aorta significantly more often in TAV patients (P = .029). Aortic root replacements were performed significantly more often in BAV patients (P < .001). Postoperative outcome was similar between the 2 groups. BAV patients had a significantly larger maximum postdissection diameter (P < .001) and calculated predissection diameter (P < .001) compared with TAV patients. Predissection ascending aortic diameters were less than 5.5 cm in 96% of all TAV patients and less than 5.0 cm in 76% of all BAV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissection in BAV patients is not associated with worse clinical or long-term outcome but significantly influences the proximal aortic repair. After modeling predissection aortic diameters, less than 5% of all TAV patients and possibly less than 25% of all BAV patients would meet the elective threshold for preventative replacement of the ascending aorta.

[Surgical treatment of acute aortic syndrome: an update]. / Trattamento chirurgico della patologia aortica acuta: un update.

The term "acute aortic syndrome" describes a variety of acute and emerging aortic pathologies that include intramural hematoma, penetrating aortic ulcer and acute aortic dissection. However, the acute pathology of the thoracic aorta also includes the contained ruptures of aortic aneurysms, traumatic aortic ruptures and iatrogenic aortic dissections. In all these acute situations, in which emerging surgical treatment is often required, decision-making represents a crucial and extremely important phase, which often affects the patient's prognosis, in the short and long term. This review aims to present an update of the surgical treatment of acute aortic syndrome focusing mainly on the correct decision-making, the factors that influence it and the latest novel surgical techniques and strategies.