Virtual Surgical Guidance Improves Quality of Life Following Scapular Free-Flap Reconstruction of Maxillary Defects.

BACKGROUND: The best approach to maxillary reconstruction with negative impact on the patient's quality of life (QOL) remains the subject of debate. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the QOL outcomes following maxillary reconstruction using a scapular-free flap, with and without the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was performed following the CONSORT checklist. To be included, patients suffering from maxillary defects without previous surgery or lymph node involvement were selected. Patients with poor oncological prognosis, deficient performance status, preoperative chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, besides vascular contraindications, were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was the reconstruction technique, grouped into two equal categories. Patients were randomly assigned to reconstruction with a scapular-free flap, with the control group not utilizing a guide and the study group utilizing a CAD/CAM-customized guide. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was the various domains of QOL, measured using the University of Washington Quality of Life score, 12 months after reconstruction. COVARIATES: Age; sex; scapular flap side; and maxillary defect tumour type, histopathology, side, length, class, sagittal, and axial differential areas were considered. ANALYSES: Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed for normality. For comparisons between the two groups, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used. The category variables were compared using the χ2 test. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The sample was composed of twenty-two eligible patients, eleven in each group. The mean age of the control group was (50.09 ± 17.14) years, and 45.45% were male, while in the study group, the mean age was (48.36 ± 14.14) years, with 36.36% male. All the patients were evaluated, showing statistically significant differences between control and study groups in terms of pain, appearance, chewing, swallowing, speech, and shoulder (P ≤ .05), indicating that the scapular-free flap with a CAD/CAM osteotomy guide had improved the patient's QOL. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study indicate that virtual surgical planning with a CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide using a scapular-free flap can improve QOL in maxillary reconstruction in terms of pain, appearance, chewing and swallowing food, pronouncing words, and shoulder QOL outcomes.

Technical refinements of the scapular tip-free flap for mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The use of scapular tip chimeric free flaps (STFFs) for reconstructing mandibular defects has recently become popular, but its utility relative to other bone-containing free flaps remains debatable. The aim of the report is to describe how technical modification of STFF impacted in its use for mandibular reconstruction also commenting results obtained in a unicentric series of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction using an STFF from January 1, 2014 to June 1, 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this report. We collected data on chimeric flap type, bone management, vascular pedicles, and the final outcomes. In total, 31 patients (13 men and 18 women) with a mean age of 68 years were enrolled. According to the classification system of Urken, 15 patients had body defects, while 7 had ramus defects, another 7 had symphysis defects, and 2 had both ramus and bodily defects. STFF was always harvested working in two equips simultaneously, in supine position. Dissection included preparation of chimeric components of the flap as latissimus dorsi, serratus and scapular tip. After pedicle dissection scapular bone was cut basing on reconstructive needing with a rectangular (stick) shape including the border of the scapula. In cases of longer bone harvesting, circumflex pedicle was also included to perfuse the upper portion of the scapular border. In five cases, the STFF was harvested with only the scapular angle component, and was thus a composite osteomuscular flap; for the remaining 26 cases, a chimeric STFF was used. Circumflex pedicle was included for eight patients. Six of the seven patients with symphyseal defects underwent a single osteotomy. RESULTS: The average length of the harvested was 69.92 mm (maximum length = 104 mm). The average height of transplanted bone was 26.78 mm (maximum height = 44.2 mm). Mouth-opening was normal in 25 patients, limited in 6 patients, and severely impaired in no patients. The cosmetic results were rated as excellent by 20 patients, good by 8 patients, and poor by 3 patients. CONCLUSION: The STFF is an excellent option for mandibular reconstruction when other flaps are not available and for patients in poor general condition. Technical innovations here presented made possible to harvest long bone segments with accurate shape thanks to osteotomies if needed and with adequate soft tissues components of the chimeric flap, ensuring satisfactory functional and cosmetic results.

The versatility of the scapular free flap: A workhorse flap? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The scapular free flap (SFF) is essential in complex reconstructive surgery and often indicated in complex defects with compromised or poor local tissue integrity. This review aims to assess the versatility and reliability of the SFF during reconstruction. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of multiple databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. An analysis of pooled data was performed to evaluate flap failure rate for any anatomical unit using SFF as the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included other complication rates after reconstruction such as partial flap loss, revision surgery, fistula, hematoma, and infection. RESULTS: A total of 110 articles were included, with 1447 pooled flaps. The main recipient site was the head and neck region (89.0%). Major indications for reconstruction were malignancy (55.3%), burns (19.2%), and trauma (9.3%). The most common types of flaps were osteocutaneous (23.3%), cutaneous (22.6%), and chimeric (18.0%). The pooled flap failure rate was 2% (95%CI: 1%-4%). No significant heterogeneity was present across studies (Q statistic 20.2, p = .69; I2 .00%, p = .685). Nonscapular supplementary flaps and grafts were required in 61 cases. The average length and surface area of bone flaps were 7.2 cm and 24.8cm2, respectively. The average skin paddle area was 134.2cm2. CONCLUSION: The SFF is a useful adjunct in the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium as evidence by its intrinsic versatility and diverse clinical indications. Our data suggest a low failure rate in multicomponent defect reconstruction, especially in head and neck surgery. SFFs enable incorporation of multiple tissue types and customizable dimensions-both for vascularized bone and cutaneous skin-augmenting its value in the microsurgeon's repertoire as a chimeric flap. Further research is necessary to overcome the conventional barriers to SFF utilization and to better comprehend the specific scenarios in which the SFF can serve as the preferred alternative workhorse flap.

Scapula harvest in the supine position for immediate mandibular reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The scapula is the second most popular donor site for mandibular reconstruction after the fibula. Scapula harvest is generally performed in the lateral decubitus position and the requirement of positional changes hamper the widespread use of the scapula. This study compared scapula harvest for immediate mandibular reconstruction between the supine and lateral decubitus positions. METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of 16 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction of the scapula based on the angular branch of the thoracodorsal artery. The scapula was harvested in the lateral decubitus (lateral decubitus group) or supine position (supine group) in eight patients each. Several perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One scapula was lost because of inadvertent injury of the angular branch in the supine group. The operative time was significantly shorter in the supine group than in the lateral decubitus group. CONCLUSION: Harvesting of the scapula in the supine position is a feasible option for immediate mandibular reconstruction. Although deep anatomic knowledge and technical expertise are necessary, this strategy can eliminate positional change and significantly reduce the operative time.

Use of scapular tip flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scapular tip flaps (STF) may be used as an alternative to traditional methods of reconstruction of head and neck cancer (HNC) defects. This study aimed to establish the success and complication rates for STF in HNC reconstruction. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, BMJ Journals, DARE, EMBASE databases and Cochrane (CENTRAL) register. (Registry CRD42023428012). A total of 23 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 474 patients who underwent reconstructive procedures using the STF. 100% of STF used were free flaps (STFFs). The most common reason for reconstruction was following malignancy (81.4%, n = 386). The pooled success rates in all studies using scapular tip flaps in head and neck reconstruction was 99% (95% CI, 97 to 100, p = 1.00; I2 = 0). Pooled total complication rates were 38% (95% CI, 25 to 51, p < 0.01; I2 = 90%). 19.6% required return to theatre with only 1.5% being for repeat flap coverage. The STF demonstrated an overall success rate of 99%. This is higher than other documented success rates with mainstay flaps for HNC defect reconstruction. Complication and re-operation rates were also like recorded rates. This review demonstrates the advantage of STF as a safe and versatile reconstructive option for HNC related defects. Evaluation of the literature is limited by poor-quality studies and comparability bias.

Maxillary reconstruction with horizontally oriented scapular tip free flap: outcomes in orbital support and palate closure.

BACKGROUND: Current indications of maxillary reconstruction with scapular tip free flap (STFF) are palatoalveolar defects associated with zygomaticomaxillary buttress and/or orbital floor defects. STFF can be placed either horizontally or vertically. Horizontal placement usually allows ideal palatal conformation, preventing oronasal communication, but has been argued to compromise orbital support and projection of the midface, whereas vertical placement is advocated for midface support but may be insufficient for the complete closure of the palate. The present study focuses on the horizontal placing of STFF to allow complete palate reconstruction and fistulae prevention while still obtaining optimal midface projection and orbital support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 21 case complex maxillary reconstructions with this flap, in which the horizontally placed scapular tip component replaced the palate, a muscular flap component was included for midface volume restoration, and an alloplastic implant was utilized for supporting the orbital content when needed. RESULTS: None of the patients presented palatal fistulas or alterations in the orbital support. CONCLUSION: A multilevel approach was proposed according to the maxillectomy defect. This experience supported the horizontal insetting of STFF to allow palatal fistulae prevention while still obtaining an optimal midface projection and orbital support.

Chimeric scapular tip flap for the reconstruction of extensive defects of the midface / Colgajo quimérico de punta escapular para la reconstrucción del tercio medio facial

AIM: The main aim of the present report was to show the potential utility of scapular tip flap for maxillary reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 4 patients that had undergone maxillary reconstruction by using a microvascular scapular tip flap in our department were retrospectively reviewed to identify the possible advantages and disadvantages of this type of flap. Aesthetic and functional outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: No evidence was found for failures, partial failures, or infection in our series. Scapular tip flap allowed for great aesthetic and functional outcomes. All anastomoses were performed with the facial vessels and there was no need to use arterial or vein graft. No major complications were observed at the donor site during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Scapular tip flap may be extremely useful in the reconstruction of extensive defect of the midface. Pedicle length, versatility and reliability represent the major advantages of this type of free flap. Moreover, the resistance of the scapular vascular system to atherosclerosis may be helpful in patients showing contraindications to free fibula flaps

OBJETIVO: El principal objetivo de este estudio es demostrar la potencial utilidad del colgajo libre de ángulo escapular para la reconstrucción maxilar. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Las historias clínicas de cuatro pacientes sometidos a reconstrucción de maxilar superior mediante el colgajo libre de ángulo escapular fueron analizadas cuidadosamente con el objetivo de evidenciar las potenciales ventajas de este recurso reconstructivo. RESULTADOS: No se evidenciaron fracasos totales o parciales. Este tipo de colgajo permitió resultados estéticos y funcionales altamente favorables. Todas las anastomosis se realizaron con los vasos faciales, sin necesidad de injertos arteriales o venosos. No se evidenciaron complicaciones de importancia a nivel de la zona donante. CONCLUSIÓN: El colgajo microvascularizado de ángulo escapular podría ser muy útil para la reconstrucción del maxilar superior. Longitud de pedículo, versatilidad y reproducibilidad son las principales ventajas de este colgajo. Además, debido a la resistencia del sistema vascular escapular a la aterosclerosis, podría ser muy útil cuando el colgajo de peroné esté contraindicado