Diagnosis of verruciform acanthotic vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (vaVIN) using CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: Verruciform acanthotic vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (vaVIN) is an HPV-independent, p53 wild-type lesion with distinct morphology and documented risk of recurrence and cancer progression. vaVIN is rare, and prospective distinction from non-neoplastic hyperplastic lesions can be difficult. CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry has emerging value in the diagnosis of HPV-independent lesions, particularly differentiated VIN. We aimed to test the combined value of these markers in the diagnosis of vaVIN versus its non-neoplastic differentials in the vulva. METHODS AND RESULTS: CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry was evaluated on 16 vaVINs and 34 mimickers (verruciform xanthoma, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen sclerosus, psoriasis, pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia). CK17 was scored as 3+ = full-thickness, 2+ = partial-thickness, 1+ = patchy, 0 = absent; SOX2 as 3+ = strong staining ≥ 10% cells, 2+ = moderate, 1 + =weak, 0 = staining in < 10% cells; and GATA3 as pattern 0 = loss in < 25% basal cells, 1 = loss in 25-75% basal cells, 2 = loss in > 75% basal cells. For analysis, results were recorded as positive (CK17 = 3+, SOX2 = 3+, GATA3 = patterns 1/2) or negative (CK17 = 2+/1+/0, SOX2 = 2+/1+/0, GATA3 = pattern 0). CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 positivity was documented in 81, 75 and 58% vaVINs, respectively, versus 32, 17 and 22% of non-neoplastic mimickers, respectively; ≥ 2 marker positivity conferred 83 sensitivity, 88 specificity and 86% accuracy in vaVIN diagnosis. Compared to vaVIN, SOX2 and GATA3 were differentially expressed in lichen sclerosus, lichen simplex chronicus and pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia, whereas CK17 was differentially expressed in verruciform xanthoma and adjacent normal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 can be useful in the diagnosis of vaVIN and its distinction from hyperplastic non-neoplastic vulvar lesions. Although CK17 has higher sensitivity, SOX2 and GATA3 are more specific, and the combination of all markers shows optimal diagnostic accuracy.

Immunophenotypic classification regarding prognosis in peripheral T cell lymphoma, NOS, and nodal T follicular helper T cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic-type.

This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological predictive factors of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), and nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic-type (nTFH, AI-type). In this single-centered, retrospective study, medical records of 59 patients who were diagnosed with PTCL, NOS, or nTFH, AI-type from March 2007 to September 2022 were reviewed. The clinicopathological variables, including immunohistochemistry(IHC) subgroups, distinguishing TBX21 from the GATA3 subgroups were analyzed. Overall, 28 patients (75.7%) in the TBX21 group were PTCL, NOS. There were 9 (24.3%) patients in the GATA3 group. In univariable analyses, lymphoma subtype, age, and performance status were associated with progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In multivariable analyses, lymphoma subtype, and performance status were related to PFS and OS (P = 0.012, P < 0.001, P = 0.006, and P < 0.001, respectively). The GATA3 subgroup tended to have a worse prognosis in univariable analyses; however, it became more insignificant in multivariable when lymphoma subtype and performance status were adjusted (P = 0.065, P = 0.180, P = 0.972, and P = 0.265, respectively). The double-positive group showed variable prognoses of better PFS and worse OS. PD-1 and PD-L1 were associated with the EBV in situ hybridization (P = 0.027, and P = 0.005), and PD-1 was associated with CD30 expression (P = 0.043). This study demonstrated the potential of IHC classification to predict prognosis for PTCL, NOS, as well as nTFH AI-type, although further validation is necessary. Treatments targeting CD30, PD-1, and PD-L1 appear promising for lymphoma treatment.

Premature Classification of Early-stage Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma With Mesonephric-like Differentiation as Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma.

Ovarian mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a rare tumor with potential origins in endometriosis and Müllerian-type epithelial tumors. The morphologic patterns of MLA overlap with those of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC). We speculated that a subset of MLAs would be classified as EnOCs. In this study, we attempted to identify MLAs from malignant endometrioid tumors. Given that the study patients with MLAs had both endometrioid-like and mesonephric-like morphologies, we defined mesonephric-like differentiation (MLD) as an endometrioid tumor with focal or diffuse MLA morphology and immunophenotype. Twelve patients exhibited mesonephric-like morphologic patterns. Immunohistochemistry analysis for CD10, TTF-1, estrogen receptor (ER), GATA3, calretinin, and PAX8 expression was done using whole-section slides. Two patients without the MLA immunophenotype were excluded. Ten patients with EnOCs with MLD (8.3%) were identified from a cohort of 121 patients with malignant endometrioid tumors. All 10 patients were positive for TTF-1 and/or GATA3. Most patients were ER-negative. Morphologically, MLD was associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma-like nuclei, flattened cells, tubular, nested, reticular, or glomeruloid architecture, and infiltrative growth. All 10 patients had pre-existing endometriosis and/or adenofibromas. Among the EnOCs with MLD, 5 had coexisting components such as EnOC grade 1 [(G1), cases 4, 7, and 9], mucinous borderline tumor (case 1), and dedifferentiated carcinoma (case 10), with distinct borders between EnOC with MLD and the other components. Nine of the 10 MLA patients (90%) harbored KRAS hotspot mutations. In addition, 4 patients harboring other components shared common KRAS hotspot mutations. No significant prognostic differences were observed between patients with and without MLD. Based on our findings, we suggest that EnOC with MLD, especially in the early stages and without high-grade components, should be considered a subtype of EnOC. Overtreatment should be avoided in such patients, particularly in the early stages. In this study, as the characteristics between EnOC with MLD and MLA were not distinguishable, we considered both conditions to be on the same spectrum. EnOCs with MLD exhibit the MLA phenotype during disease progression and are prematurely classified as MLA. Nevertheless, more patients with EnOC who have MLD/MLA are required for a more robust comparison between conventional EnOC according to staging and grading.

TRPS1: a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma, especially for triple-negative breast cancer.

Currently there is no highly specific and sensitive marker to identify breast cancer-the most common malignancy in women. Breast cancer can be categorized as estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) types based on the expression of ER, PR, and HER2. Although GATA3 is the most widely used tumor marker at present to determine the breast origin, which has been shown to be an excellent marker for ER-positive and low-grade breast cancer, but it does not work well for TNBC with sensitivity as low as <20% in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, through TCGA data mining we identified trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) as a specific gene for breast carcinoma across 31 solid tumor types. Moreover, high mRNA level of TRPS1 was found in all four subtypes of breast carcinoma including ER/PR-positive luminal A and B types, HER2-positive type, and basal-type/TNBC. We then analyzed TRPS1 expression in 479 cases of various types of breast cancer using immunochemistry staining, and found that TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable positive expression in ER-positive (98% vs. 95%) and HER2-positive (87% vs. 88%) breast carcinomas. However, TRPS1 which was highly expressed in TNBC, was significantly higher than GATA3 expression in metaplastic (86% vs. 21%) and nonmetaplastic (86% vs. 51%) TNBC. In addition, TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1234 cases of solid tumor from different organs. In contrast to the high expression of GATA3 in urothelial carcinoma, TRPS1 showed no or little expression in urothelial carcinomas or in other tumor types including lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colon and gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and ovarian carcinoma. These findings suggest that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma and can be used as a great diagnostic tool, especially for TNBC.

Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: interpretation and pitfalls.

Immunohistochemistry is an essential component of diagnostic breast pathology. The emergence of novel assays and applications is accompanied by new interpretation criteria and potential pitfalls. Immunohistochemistry assists in supporting breast origin for primary or metastatic carcinomas and identifying non-mammary metastases to the breast; however, no single immunostain is perfectly sensitive nor specific. GATA3 and Sox10 are particularly useful immunostains to identify triple negative breast carcinoma, which are often negative for other markers of mammary differentiation. Sox10 labeling is a major potential diagnostic pitfall, as Sox10 and S-100 label both triple negative breast carcinoma and metastatic melanoma; a pan-cytokeratin immunostain should always be included for this differential diagnosis. Novel immunohistochemistry serves as surrogates for the molecular alterations unique to several of special-type breast carcinomas, including the use of MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma, pan-TRK in secretory carcinoma, and mutant IDH2 in tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP). In addition, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is an emerging, albeit imperfect, biomarker for breast cancer immunotherapy, with different assay parameters and scoring criteria in breast carcinoma compared to other tumor types. The expanding repertoire of novel immunohistochemistry provides additional diagnostic tools and biomarkers that improve diagnostic breast pathology and patient care.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and its renal papillary adenoma analogue.

AIMS: Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. It has been estimated to constitute 4% of previously diagnosed papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Renal papillary adenoma (PA) is suggested to be the precursor of PRCC. This study aimed to investigate the association between PRNRP and PA, particularly the morphologically similar type D PA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nephrectomy specimens of PRCC and PA from our 10-year pathology archives were retrieved and reviewed. GATA3 immunohistochemistry and RAS/BRAF testing were performed in all cases reclassified as PRNRP and all PAs with sufficient materials. Overall, PRNRP accounted for 9.1% (10 of 110) of PRCC and there was no recurrence/metastasis with a mean follow-up period of 39 months. Three novel morphological features were described, including clear cell change, mast cell infiltration and metaplastic ossification. Nine of the 10 PRNRPs showed diffuse and strong GATA3 expression and KRAS missense mutations at codon 12. One case exhibited moderate GATA3 staining on 80% of the tumour cells and RAS/BRAF wild-type. In a total of 73 PAs, 11 were classified as type D. GATA3 expression was significantly more frequent in type D versus non-type D PAs (100 versus 35%, P < 0.01). KRAS missense mutations were identified in six of eight (75%) of the type D PAs but none of the 18 non-type D PAs. CONCLUSIONS: Type D PA was different from other types of PA and represented an analogue or a small-sized PRNRP for their identical morphology, immunophenotype and molecular signature.

Atypical BCL6/GATA3+ Primary Cutaneous Acral CD8-Positive T-Cell Lymphoma: A Diagnostic Challenge.

ABSTRACT: Primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma consists of slow-growing nodules in acral sites with a histopathology, suggesting high-grade lymphoma despite the indolent clinical course. It has been recently included in WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas as a provisional entity. A correct diagnosis of this entity is important because its differential diagnosis include more aggressive cutaneous lymphomas. We present a 53-year-old woman with an indolent solitary nodule on her right leg, which histopathologically showed features of CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma, although with some peculiarities, including epidermotropism, absence of CD68 expression, and positivity for GATA3 and Bcl6 in neoplastic cells. This case could contribute to better define the spectrum of this rare cutaneous lymphoma.

Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer.

AIMS: Confirmation of a breast origin for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is sometimes problematic. The traditional breast markers GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), mammaglobin (MGB) and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) have shown limitations in identifying TNBC. Here, we aimed to examine the diagnostic potential of the newly proposed TNBC marker, Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed and compared SOX10 expression with GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 expression in a test cohort of 1838 invasive breast cancers (IBCs) by using tissue microarrays. The findings from the test cohort were further examined with a validation cohort of 42 TNBCs in whole sections. The overall expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 6.9%, 83.1%, 47.0%, and 34.8%, respectively. Among the TNBCs within this cohort, the expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 31.3%, 34.5%, 27.9%, and 25.2%, respectively. SOX10 was strongly associated with TNBC (P < 0.001), whereas all other traditional markers were associated with non-TNBC (P < 0.001 for all). In addition, SOX10 was more correlated to basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) (P = 0.001) than five-marker-negative subtype among the TNBCs. A high expression rate of SOX10 (81%) was confirmed in the validation cohort. Additionally, SOX10 expression was inversely correlated with GATA3 and GCDFP15 expression, so they may complement each other in TNBC detection. The SOX10-GATA3 combination yielded a sensitivity of 60.3% for TNBC detection in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: SOX10 is a reliable marker for identifying TNBC, and complements GATA3. The SOX10-GATA3 combination may be used as a sensitive TNBC marker.

Androgen Receptor mRNA levels determine the prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Anti-Androgen Receptor (AR) therapy holds promise for a subset of AR expressing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, current AR assays are suboptimal in detecting the dynamic range of AR expression, contributing to its controversial role in TNBC disease prognosis. This study is aimed at evaluating the feasibility of qRT-PCR to sensitively and robustly detect AR mRNA levels for prognostication. METHODS: mRNA expression profiling was performed on FFPE blocks from a retrospective cohort of 101 TNBC patients using qRT-PCR and compared with AR protein expression by immunohistochemistry . Statistical analyses included Spearman's rank correlation, Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Distant Metastasis Free Survival was used as the end point in survival analysis. RESULTS: AR mRNA expression was observed in 34/101 patients (34%) whereas 12/80 cases (15%) were positive by IHC. qRT-PCR could thus detect more AR positive patients as compared to IHC, with 75% (9/12) concordance between the two methods. Co-expression of GATA3 and FOXA1 mRNA was observed in 85 and 88% of AR mRNA positive tumors, respectively. AR mRNA positivity was significantly correlated with age at disease onset (p = 0.02), high FOXA1/GATA3 (p < 0.05) and distant recurrence. AR mRNA positive patients had poorer DMFS (43%; p = 0.002). DMFS dropped further to 26% (p = 0.006) in AR (+)/high FOXA1/GATA3 patients. AR mRNA expression together with node positivity had the worst DMFS (23%; p < 0.0001) compared to patients who were either positive for any one of these, or negative for both AR and node status. Low Ki67 mRNA with AR mRNA positivity also had poorer DMFS (39%; p = 0.001) compared to patients expressing low Ki67 with no AR mRNA expression. CONCLUSION: qRT-PCR was more sensitive and reliable in detecting the dynamic expression levels of AR compared to IHC and this variation could be explained by the higher sensitivity of the former method. High AR mRNA expression was strongly associated with expression of AR protein, high FOXA1/GATA3 mRNA, and with poor prognosis. qRT-PCR was more efficient in detecting the AR positive cases compared to IHC. A distinct signature involving high GATA3/FOXA1, low Ki67, and node positivity in AR mRNA positive tumors correlated with poor prognosis. Thus, AR mRNA screening can serve as an effective prognostic marker along with offering potential targeted therapy options for TNBC.

CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 Immunohistochemistry in Krukenberg Tumors.

Twenty-six Krukenberg tumors (16 lower gastrointestinal, 4 upper gastrointestinal, and 6 of unknown origin) and their primaries when known were stained with CDX2, SATB2, GATA3, TTF1, and PAX8 using a tissue microarray containing predominantly or exclusively signet ring cells. The most common primary was appendiceal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. CDX2 and SATB2 were positive in all known lower gastrointestinal primary tumors and negative in nearly all known upper gastrointestinal primary tumors. Primaries showed identical immunophenotypes to their metastases. Among cases of unknown primary origin, 3 were positive and 3 were negative for CDX2 and SATB2. Chest images, upper endoscopies, colonoscopies, appendectomies, and mammogram were performed with negative results in all, 4, 2, 2, and 1 cases, respectively. No cystoscopies were attempted. PAX8, GATA3, and TTF1 were negative in all cases. The literature was reviewed with emphasis on immunohistochemistry of signet ring cell-containing carcinomas from the appendix, colon, stomach, breast, lung, and bladder. Three quarters of gastric primaries stain for CDX2 and only rare examples stain for SATB2. Colorectal primaries (most of them) and appendiceal primaries (all of them) are positive for CDX2 and SATB2. GATA3 stains almost all breast primaries and approximately half of bladder primaries. All pulmonary primaries are positive for TTF1. PAX8 is negative in the gastric, colorectal, and appendiceal primaries reported. This study shows that the panel of immunostains is useful in confirming the site of origin of a metastatic Krukenberg tumor when one is known and has limited diagnostic value for diagnosing metastases of unknown origin.

Mesonephric Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: A Report on 2 Cases With Comparison to Its Cervical Counterpart.

Mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MA) is a rare tumor of the female genital tract that develops in the uterine cervix. Recently, a few cases of MA arising from the uterine body have been reported, whereas the differences between these 2 entities remain unknown. Two uterine MAs and 1 cervical MA were included in this study. In uterine MA, there was an admixture of various growth patterns with tubular, glandular, slit-like, papillary, and solid architectures. Both tumors extensively involved the endometrium, while no mesonephric remnants were noted. Immunostaining was diffusely positive for TTF-1, while there was only focal staining for GATA3. KRAS somatic mutation was present in both uterine cases. In cervical MA, the tumor also had different growth patterns but no endocervical mucosa involvement. A residual mesonephric duct was present. GATA3 showed diffuse staining, but TTF-1 was totally negative. Therefore, uterine MA was not entirely consistent with its cervical counterpart in both morphologic characteristics and immunostaining.

GATA3 immunoreactivity expands the transcription factor profile of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.

The modern classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors relies mainly on immunohistochemistry for pituitary transcription factors, hormones, and other biomarkers, including low molecular weight cytokeratins. The transcription factor GATA2 is required for development of gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs but has not been used for classification of pituitary tumors. Because of genomic paralogy of GATA2 and GATA3, we postulated that GATA3 immunohistochemistry may detect GATA2 in the adenohypophysis. We examined 151 tumors originating from Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey (n = 83) and University Health Network, Canada (n = 68). Initially, 83 tumors (26 gonadotroph, 24 somatotroph, 17 corticotroph, 12 lactotroph, 2 poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors that expressed TSH and 2 null cell tumors) from Ondokuz Mayis University were investigated with the GATA3 monoclonal antibody L50-823. Retrospective review of the files of University Health Network identified 68 tumors (43 gonadotroph, 3 somatotroph, 2 lactotroph, 1 mammosomatotroph, 9 corticotroph, 7 poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors with TSH expression, 2 plurihormonal tumors with TSH expression and 1 null cell tumor) that were examined with the same GATA3 antibody and served as a validation cohort. All somatotroph, lactotroph and mammosomatotroph tumors and the null cell tumors were negative for GATA3. Sixty-eight (98.5%) gonadotroph tumors were positive for GATA3; 64 had diffuse reactivity. Two plurihormonal tumors with TSH expression and eight (88.8%) poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors with variable TSH expression were positive for GATA3. One of 26 (3.8%) corticotroph tumors was diffusely positive for GATA3. This study shows that GATA3 immunoreactivity is characteristic of pituitary gonadotroph and TSH-producing tumors. This finding expands the pattern of transcription factors that are used to classify adenohypophysial tumors and is important in the differential diagnosis of sellar tumors, as GATA3 expression is also a feature of primary sellar paragangliomas as well as carcinomas that may metastasize to the sella.

GATA3 Expression in Common Gynecologic Carcinomas: A Potential Pitfall.

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) immunohistochemistry is primarily used as a marker of breast and urothelial differentiation, particularly in metastatic settings. In the gynecologic tract it also serves a robust marker for mesonephric and trophoblastic tumors. However, expression has also been described in more common malignancies of gynecologic tract including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical carcinomas. Data on the distribution of GATA3 expression in gynecologic malignancies is somewhat limited, particularly across different histologic subtypes of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical carcinomas. To assess the rates of GATA3 expression among common gynecologic cancers of various histologic types, 100 ovarian carcinomas, 64 endometrial carcinomas/atypical hyperplasias, 16 cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 14 endocervical adenocarcinomas were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for GATA3 positivity. Eight percent of endometrial carcinomas expressed GATA3, including 2 serous carcinomas, 1 carcinosarcoma, and 1 case of atypical hyperplasia. Six percent of ovarian carcinomas were GATA3-positive including 2 clear cell carcinomas, 2 mucinous adenocarcinomas, and 2 high-grade serous carcinomas. Thirty-eight percent of cervical SCCs showed weak to moderate staining in up to 50% of tumor cells. All endocervical adenocarcinomas were entirely negative for GATA3. In summary, GATA3 shows focal weak to moderate expression in a subset of endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. In contrast, usual-type endocervical adenocarcinomas are typically negative for GATA3, which can be helpful in differentiating them from mesonephric proliferations or carcinomas. A larger proportion of cervical SCCs express GATA3, therefore caution should be exercised when using this stain in the setting of a lower genitourinary carcinomas.

GATA3 acetylation at K119 by CBP inhibits cell migration and invasion in lung adenocarcinoma.

GATA3 is a transcriptional factor involved in the development of multiple organs. Post translational modifications of GATA3 are critical to its function. Here, we report that GATA3 interacts with and is acetylated by the acetyltransferase CBP. Class I deacetylases HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3 deacetylate GATA3. The major acetylated site of GATA3 in lung adenocarcinoma cells was determined at lysine 119 (AcK119). Functionally, GATA3-acetylation mimics K119Q mutant was found to inhibit lung adenocarcinoma cell migration and invasion with concomitant downregulation of EMT-controlling transcriptional factors Slug, Zeb1 and Zeb2. Taken together, we demonstrated that GATA3 acetylation at lysine 119 by CBP hinders the migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Evaluation and comparison of staining patterns of factor XIIIa (AC-1A1), adipophilin and GATA3 in sebaceous neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Reliable nuclear immunohistochemical stains for sebaceous neoplasms have not been readily available. Positive nuclear staining has been reported for GATA3 and factor XIIIa (AC-1A1). We sought to determine the diagnostic utility of these nuclear stains by comparing their staining pattern to adipophilin, a consistently positive cytoplasmic stain. METHODS: Cases with the diagnosis of sebaceous hyperplasia, sebaceous adenoma, sebaceous epithelioma/sebaceoma, sebaceous carcinoma, and nonsebaceous neoplasms (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) were examined. Intensity and extent of staining of the basal cells and mature sebocytes were evaluated for each stain. RESULTS: Factor XIIIa (AC-1A1) was 87.3% sensitive and 95.1% specific for all sebaceous neoplasms sand showed high inter-observer reliability. Adipophilin was 83.2% sensitive and 87.8% specific. GATA3 was the least sensitive (80.9%) and specific (75.6%) marker. When factor XIIIa was compared against composite staining of all three markers its staining was still uniquely significant (P = .0210). CONCLUSION: Factor XIIIa (AC-1A1) is a sensitive and specific nuclear marker for sebaceous differentiation. Its diagnostic utility exceeds that of adipophilin. Factor XIIIa should be included in the expanding group of immunohistochemical and special stains which can be utilized to aid in the diagnosis of sebaceous neoplasms.

GATA3 staining in primary cutaneous apocrine cribriform carcinoma: Usefulness to differentiate it from breast cancer metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous apocrine cribriform carcinoma (PCACC) is a rare tumor, clinically appearing as a solitary nodule, mostly involving extremities of females and this lesion usually raises a differential diagnosis with metastatic cribriform carcinomas, especially breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To study GATA3 expression in a series of 14 primary cutaneous cribriform carcinomas and to test its usefulness to differentiate this tumor from metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: We retrieved 14 cases with PCACC (each from a different patient) from the files of the authors. Cases were dated from 1994 to 2014. We also evaluated 6 cases of cutaneous breast cancer metastasis RESULTS: No PCACCs expressed GATA3. Breast cancer metastases expressed GATA3 in 100% of our studied cases. CONCLUSION: Even though GATA3 expression has been reported in many benign and malignant adnexal tumors (mostly of sebaceous, follicular, and apocrine differentiation), as well as in many other neoplasms, GATA3 staining to differentiate PCACC from skin breast cancer metastasis has a high negative predictive value. A positive GATA3 staining in this context should permit one to rule out PCACC with a high level of confidence.

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of plasma cell-rich rejection in renal transplantation: Involvement of intratubular Th1/Th2 balance in plasma cell enrichment.

AIM: Plasma cell-rich rejection (PCRR) has been considered a subtype of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (ATCR). However, PCRR is recognized as refractory rejection and different from ATCR in various ways. In order to elucidate the pathogenesis of PCRR, we analysed PCRR clinicopathologically and immunohistochemically by comparing it with ATCR. METHODS: Twelve cases of PCRR (PCRRs) and 22 cases of usual ATCR (ATCRs) diagnosed at our hospital between January 2008 and March 2017 were included. Between PCRRs and ATCRs, we compared clinical data, Banff classification, graft outcome and the total sum number of T-bet- and GATA3-positive lymphocytes infiltrating in tubular epithelium using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Plasma cell-rich rejections occurred later than ATCRs (median time after transplantation 1340.5 days vs. 52.5 days). Serum creatinine levels at discharge after treatment were significantly higher in PCRRs than in ATCRs (median 2.38 vs. 1.65 mg/dL). Cumulative rate of graft loss was significantly higher in PCRRs than in ATCRs (1-, 2- and 5-year: 26.7%, 51.1% and 51.1% vs. 0%, 0% and 17.5%). For profiles of Th1 and Th2, we found significantly lower ratio of T-bet/GATA3-positive lymphocytes in PCRRs compared with ATCRs. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that PCRR is more refractory than ATCR and there are significant differences in populations of helper T-cell subsets between them. We consider helper T-cell subset analysis valuable for developing new treatment strategies for PCRR.

GATA3 expression in triple-negative breast cancers.

AIMS: GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a well-studied transcription factor found to be essential in the development of luminal breast epithelium and has been identified in a variety of tumour types, including breast and urothelial carcinomas, making it a useful immunohistochemistry marker in the diagnosis of both primary and metastatic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated GATA3 protein expression in a 106 primary triple-negative breast carcinomas (100 basal-like, six non-basal-like) using Cell Marque mouse monoclonal anti-GATA3 (L50-823). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to quantify mRNA expression in 22 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) (20 primary and two cell lines), four luminal (three primary and one cell line) and five human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (four primary and one cell line) amplified tumours. In 98 TNBCs where IHC was assessable, 47 (48%) had a 1+ or greater staining with 20 (21%) having high GATA3 expression when using a weighted scoring. CONCLUSION: Our study has demonstrated that GATA3 expression is common in primary triple-negative breast carcinomas. It also suggests that although GATA3 is an oestrogen receptor (ER) regulated gene, it still proves useful in differentiating between primary and metastatic tumours in patients with a history of breast cancer regardless of its molecular subtype.

Utility of GATA3 in the differential diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

AIMS: GATA3 is a relatively new immunohistochemical marker which shows consistent nuclear expression in a variety of tumours, including breast and urothelial carcinoma. The staining pattern of GATA3 in adrenal lesions is not well established. We aim to describe the expression of GATA3 in adrenal tumours and determine if there is differential staining between pheochromocytoma and adrenal cortical carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective search was performed to identify 74 adrenal lesions which were tested immunohistochemically for GATA3 expression. GATA3 was negative in 90% of adrenal cortical carcinoma. In contrast, pheochromocytomas were frequently positive (71%), including benign pheochromocytoma, pheochromocytoma with features concerning for malignancy, malignant (metastatic) pheochromocytoma and composite pheochromocytoma with ganglioneuroma. Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in the adrenal gland had occasional (36%) expression, while metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the adrenal gland did not express GATA3. CONCLUSION: As the most common pitfall in diagnosing adrenal cortical carcinoma is mistaking it for pheochromocytoma or vice versa, GATA3 may be useful in narrowing the differential diagnosis as a part of a panel of immunohistochemical markers. However, occasional GATA3 expression in the most common source of metastases within the adrenal gland, metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma, may confound the diagnosis due to the overlapping expression with pheochromocytoma and other carcinomas.

GATA3 expression in benign prostate glands with radiation atypia: a diagnostic pitfall.

AIMS: Patients who have undergone prostate radiation are at increased risk for developing urothelial carcinoma. Radiation changes can cause significant cytological atypia in benign prostate glands that may mimic pagetoid spread of urothelial carcinoma. GATA3 is a common marker for differentiating prostatic adenocarcinoma from urothelial carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of GATA3 in the epithelium of irradiated benign and malignant prostate tissue. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective review of prostate cases with radiation atypia. GATA3 staining was performed on benign prostate tissue with and without radiation atypia, as well as on residual/recurrent prostatic adenocarcinoma after radiation therapy. PIN4 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on prostate tissue with radiation atypia to confirm the presence of both basal and luminal cells. We identified 31 cases with benign prostate glands containing radiation atypia. The average time between treatment with radiation therapy and the surgical procedure was 10 years (range 5-20 years). PIN4 IHC staining confirmed the presence of basal and luminal cells in benign prostate glands with radiation atypia. Thirty-one of 31 (100%) cases of benign prostate tissue with radiation atypia showed staining for GATA3 in both basal and luminal cells. Eight of eight (100%) cases of benign prostate glands without radiation atypia and no inflammatory changes showed GATA3 positivity limited to basal cells. GATA3 was negative in 12/12 (100%) cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma after radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Benign prostate glands with radiation atypia show diffuse positivity for GATA3. This staining pattern, along with the cytological atypia resulting from radiation, can mimic urothelial carcinoma.