A generic scope actuation system for flexible endoscopes.

BACKGROUND: A scope actuation system assists a surgeon in steering a scope for navigating an operative field during an interventional or diagnostic procedure. Each system is tailored for a specific surgical procedure. The development of a generic scope actuation system could assist various laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures. This has the potential to reduce the deployment and maintenance costs for a hospital, making it more accessible for clinical usage. METHODS: A modular actuation system (for maneuvering rigid laparoscopes) was adapted to enable incorporation of flexible endoscopes. The design simplifies the installation and disassembly processes. User studies were conducted to assess the ability of the system to focus onto a diagnostic area, and to navigate during a simulated esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure. During the studies, the endoscope was maneuvered with (robotic mode) and without (manual mode) the actuation system to navigate the endoscope's focus on a predefined track. RESULTS: Results show that the robotic mode performed better than the manual mode on all the measured performance parameters including (a) the total duration to traverse a track, (b) the percentage of time spent outside a track while traversing, and (c) the number of times the scope focus shifts outside the track. Additionally, robotic mode also reduced the perceived workload based on the NASA-TLX scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed scope actuation system enhances the maneuverability of flexible endoscopes. It also lays the groundwork for future development of modular and generic scope assistant systems that can be used in both laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures.

Quantitative assessment of the troCarWash™ system for automated laparoscopic camera cleaning.

BACKGROUND: Soilage of the surgical endoscope occurs frequently during minimally invasive surgery. The resultant impairment of visualization of the surgical field compromises patient safety, prolongs operative times, and frustrates surgeons. The standard practice for cleaning the surgical camera involves a disruption in the conduct of surgery by completely removing the endoscope from the field, manually cleaning its lens, treating it with a surfactant, and reinserting it into the patient; after which the surgeon resumes the procedure. METHODS: We developed an automated solution for in vivo endoscope cleaning in minimally invasive surgery- a port that detects the position of the endoscope in its distal lumen, and precisely and automatically delivers a pressurized mist of cleaning solution to the lens of the camera. No additions to the scope and minimal user interaction with the port are required. We tested the efficacy of this troCarWash™ device in a porcine model of laparoscopy. Four board-certified general surgeons were instructed to soil and then clean the laparoscope using the device. Representative pre- and post-clean images were exported from the surgical video and clarity was graded (1) digitally by a canny edge detection algorithm, and (2) subjectively by 3 blinded, unbiased observers using a semi-quantitative scale. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant improvements in clarity by each method and for each surgeon, and we noted significant correlation between digital and subjective scores. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we conclude that the troCarWash™ effectively restored impaired visualization in a large animal model of laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic Trocars: Marketed Versus True Dimensions-A Descriptive Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish true dimensions of single-use laparoscopic trocars compared with marketed dimensions, calculate corresponding incision sizes, examine what trocar size categories are based on, and outline accessibility of information regarding true dimensions. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Laparoscopic disposable trocars available in North America and Europe are marketed in several distinct categories. In practice, trocars in the same-size category exhibit different functionality (ability to introduce instruments/needles and retrieve specimens) and warrant different incision lengths. PATIENTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: True dimensions for 125 trocars (bladeless, optical, and balloon) were obtained from 9 vendors covering 8 marketed size categories (3-, 3.5-, 5-, 8-, 10-, 11-, 12-, and 15-mm trocars). On average, true inner cannula diameter was 0.92 mm wider (SD, 0.41 mm; range, 0-2.4 mm) than the marketed size category, with the widest range in the 5 mm category. For 5-mm trocars, mean true inner diameter was 6.1 mm (SD, 0.45; range, 5.5-7.4) and true outer diameter 8.3 mm (SD, 0.71; range, 8.0-10.7). For 12-mm trocars, mean true inner diameter was 13.0 mm (SD, 0.21; range, 12-13.3) and outer diameter 15.3 mm (SD, 0.48; range, 14.4-16.8). Five-mm trocars necessitate a mean incision size of 13.0 mm (SD, 1.1; range, 12.1-16.8) and 12-mm trocars a mean incision of 24.0 mm (SD, 0.75; range, 22.6-26.4). No vendors stated actual diameters on company website or catalog. In one instance the Instructions For Use document contained the true inner diameter. CONCLUSION: Trocar size categories give a false sense of standardization when in actuality there are considerable within-category differences in both inner and outer diameters, corresponding to differences in functionality and required incision sizes. There is no universally applied definition for trocar size categories. Accessibility of information on true dimensions is limited.

A new scope warmer/cleaner for laparoscopic surgery: a disposable hot pack.

BACKGROUND: Fogging and staining of a laparoscope lens negatively impact surgical visualization. We hypothesized that the disposable hot pack could not only warm but also clean laparoscopes. Hence, this study verified and developed the disposable hot pack with anti-fogging and cleaning function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The laparoscope was inserted into a swine abdominal cavity for five minutes. Then, the laparoscopic tip was heated with 65 °C saline or the folded disposable hot pack with nonwoven fabric coated surfactant for ten seconds (n = 15). Also, a laparoscopic tip with dirt was wiped with the prototype or conventional gauze for 10 s (n = 10). The dirt, fogging, and temperature of the laparoscopic tip were respectively evaluated after the laparoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity. RESULTS: The laparoscopic tip temperature five minutes after insertion into the abdominal cavity was similar (31.1 °C vs 31.2 °C, p = 0.748) and there was no fogging in both methods. The conventional gauze had significantly less temperature of the laparoscopic tip after cleaning and higher fogging occurrence than the prototype (29.5 °C vs 34.0 °C, p < 0.001, 30% vs 0%, p = 0.030, respectively), although there was no dirt left after both methods. CONCLUSION: The disposable hot pack has a strong potential as an anti-fogging and cleaning device for use during laparoscopic surgery.

Gender equity in surgical instruments: ergonomics of ring-handled forceps.

INTRODUCTION: Female surgeons have ergonomic issues with commercialized instruments tailored for male surgeons. The purpose of this study was to identify satisfaction levels and ergonomic problems of female surgeons while using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles and suggest improvement measures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 19,405 members of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery via email between 1 August 2022 and 30 September 2022. It included demographic information and specific questions regarding the use of laparoscopic forceps with ring- handles (ergonomic evaluation, influence of the negative aspects of laparoscopic forceps during surgery, physical discomfort in the hands and fingers, degree of satisfaction, and handle size). RESULTS: Valid responses were received from 1,030 respondents (131 female and 899 male surgeons). The ergonomics of the laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles were rated lower by female surgeons in all ten categories (all p value < 0.05). They also reported a negative impact on surgical manipulation and discomfort to their hands and fingers. CONCLUSIONS: Female surgeons had a wide variety of ergonomic problems when using laparoscopic forceps with ring-handles, and showed lower levels of satisfaction. Developing a different model tailored to female surgeons with smaller hands and a weaker grip could be a viable solution.

Hybrid optical-vision tracking in laparoscopy: accuracy of navigation and ultrasound reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The use of laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery is increasing. However, it presents challenges such as limited field of view and organ deformations. Surgeons rely on laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) for guidance, but mentally correlating ultrasound images with pre-operative volumes can be difficult. In this direction, surgical navigation systems are being developed to assist with intra-operative understanding. One approach is performing intra-operative ultrasound 3D reconstructions. The accuracy of these reconstructions depends on tracking the LUS probe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study evaluates the accuracy of LUS probe tracking and ultrasound 3D reconstruction using a hybrid tracking approach. The LUS probe is tracked from laparoscope images, while an optical tracker tracks the laparoscope. The accuracy of hybrid tracking is compared to full optical tracking using a dual-modality tool. Ultrasound 3D reconstruction accuracy is assessed on an abdominal phantom with CT transformed into the optical tracker's coordinate system. RESULTS: Hybrid tracking achieves a tracking error < 2 mm within 10 cm between the laparoscope and the LUS probe. The ultrasound reconstruction accuracy is approximately 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Hybrid tracking shows promising results that can meet the required navigation accuracy for laparoscopic liver surgery.

Effect of Chitosan-assisted Combination of Laparoscope and Hysteroscope on the Levels of IFN-γ and ICAM-1 in Treatment of Infertility Caused by Obstruction of Fallopian Tubes.

This experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of combined treatment of tubal obstruction infertility with deacetylated chitosan and two microscopes on the levels of IFN-γ and ICAM-1. In this study, 100 infertile patients with fallopian tube obstruction who were treated in Jiangbei District Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine from January to August 2019 were divided into two groups according to the alternating grouping method, group A (50 cases) received combined surgery, and Group B (50 cases) received combined surgery and chitosan. The curative effect and postoperative pelvic adhesion of the two groups were analyzed, and the levels of IFN-γ, ICAM-1 and IL6(IL-6), laminin (LN), Transforming growth factor beta 1(TGF-ß1) and fibronectin (FN) were observed before and after treatment. Results showed that the total effective rate of Group B was higher than that of Group A (92. 00% vs 76. 00%). The incidence of pelvic adhesion was lower in Group A (4. 00% vs 16. 00%) (P < 0.05). The levels of IFN-γ, ICAM-1, IL-6, LN, FN and TGF-ß1 in Group B were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the treatment of tubal obstruction infertility with combined deacetylated chitosan and biendoscopy is effective, which can reduce the levels of IFN-γ and ICAM-1, improve the expression of adhesion-related factors and reduce the occurrence of pelvic adhesion.

Scope actuation system for articulated laparoscopes.

BACKGROUND: An articulated laparoscope comprises a rigid shaft with an articulated distal end to change the viewing direction. The articulation provides improved navigation of the operating field in confined spaces. Furthermore, incorporation of an actuation system tends to enhance the control of an articulated laparoscope. METHODS: A preliminary prototype of a scope actuation system to maneuver an off-the-shelf articulated laparoscope (EndoCAMaleon by Karl Storz, Germany) was developed. A user study was conducted to evaluate this prototype for the surgical paradigm of video-assisted thoracic surgery. In the study, the subjects maneuvered an articulated scope under two modes of operation: (a) actuated mode where an operating surgeon maneuvers the scope using the developed prototype and (b) manual mode where a surgical assistant directly maneuvers the scope. The actuated mode was further assessed for multiple configurations based on the orientation of the articulated scope at the incision. RESULTS: The data show the actuated mode scored better than the manual mode on all the measured performance parameters including (a) total duration to visualize a marked region, (a) duration for which scope focus shifts outside a predefined visualization region, and (c) number of times for which scope focus shifts outside a predefined visualization region. Among the different configurations tested using the actuated mode, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed articulated scope actuation system facilitates better navigation of an operative field as compared to a human assistant. Secondly, irrespective of the orientation in which an articulated scope's shaft is inserted through an incision, the proposed actuation system can navigate and visualize the operative field.

Effects of wide-angle laparoscopy on surgical workflow in laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is now the gold standard approach to many surgical procedures thanks to its many advantages. Minimizing distractions is essential to a safe and successful surgery and an undisrupted surgical workflow. The SurroundScope, a wide angle (270°) laparoscopic camera system has the potential to decrease surgical distractions and increase workflow. METHODS: Forty-two laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed by a single surgeon, 21 with the SurroundScope and 21 with standard angle laparoscope. Video recordings of surgeries were reviewed for calculating the number of entries of surgical tools into the field of view, relative time of tools and ports viewed in surgical field and number of times camera was removed due to fog or smoke. RESULTS: The usage of the SurroundScope resulted in a significantly lower number of entries to the field of view compared to the standard scope (58.50 versus 102; P < 0.0001). Usage of SurroundScope resulted in a significantly higher appearance ratio of tools, with a value of 1.87 compared to 1.63 for standard scope (P-value < 0.0001), and the appearance ratio of ports was also significantly higher, measuring 1.84 compared to 0.27 for the standard scope (P-value < 0.0001). In addition, the SurroundScope had to be removed and reinserted due to smoke or fog in only 2 cases (9.5%), compared to 12 cases (57.1%) in the standard scope group (P-value < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The SurroundScope camera system improves surgical workflow in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This conceivably increase the safety of the operation due to the utilization of the wide-angle view and "chip on the tip" technology.

Comparing a novel wide field of view laparoscope with conventional laparoscope while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The limited 70° field of view (FoV) used in standard laparoscopy necessitates maneuvering the laparoscope to view the ports, follow the surgical tools, and search for a target region. Complications related to events that take place outside the FoV are underreported. Recently, a novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was reported to dramatically expand the FoV from 70 to 270°. This study focuses on differences in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the SurroundScope compared to the standard laparoscope. METHODS: Forty-four laparoscopic surgeries were performed and video recorded. A subanalysis of 21 Cholecystectomies was performed and compared to 21 Cholecystectomies, performed with the standard laparoscope during the study period by the same surgeon. RESULTS: No accidental or intraoperative adverse events occurred when using the SurroundScope. Subanalysis of 21 Cholecystectomies revealed shorter fog/smoke cleaning times using the SurroundScope compared to the standard scope (1.45 ± 5.08 sec vs. 54.95 ± 137.77 sec, p = 0.0454). Furthermore, operations performed with the SurroundScope had a shorter trocar placement duration (85.0 ± 40.9 sec vs. 111.3 ± 70.5 sec; p = 0.077), shorter time to achieve critical view of safety (9.5 ± 4.14 min vs. 15.8 ± 11.87 min; p = 0.015), and shorter procedure duration (31.9 ± 10.4 min vs. 42.9 ± 22 min; p = 0.025). In post-operative evaluations, the surgeon noted that tools could be continuously followed and ports were visible without camera manipulation. Also, the surgeon agreed that the procedure could be better planned due to the wide FoV and that surgical workflow was improved. Furthermore, the surgeon agreed that the procedure was safer using the SurroundScope. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results demonstrate the advantages of the SurroundScope over standard laparoscopy. By expanding the FoV, visualization is improved, the procedure is more efficient, significantly shorter and most important, patient safety, per surgeons' testimonials is improved. Further investigation to quantify these benefits in a larger group of patients and among various surgical procedures should be considered.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare motions of the laparoscope tip during a laparoscopic task in a training box using a recent joystick-guided robotic scope holder to those manipulated by human scopists. We hypothesized that laparoscopic manipulation could be positively affected by robotic scope holders due to the elimination of unintentional movement. METHODS: Twelve surgeons participated as operators, and eight medical doctors participated in this study. Among the human scopists, five were trained surgeons and three were novices who had no experience with laparoscopic surgery. A validated laparoscopic task was used to evaluate the path length of the laparoscope tip using an optical position tracker and operative time. The operators performed the designated camera task under three different laparoscopic manipulations: using a joystick-guided robotic scope holder, expert human scopists, and novice scopists. RESULTS: The median path lengths (cm) of the laparoscopic tip were 94.0, 110.0, and 122.2 in the robotic scope holder, expert, and novice groups, respectively. The path lengths in the robotic scope holder group were significantly shorter than those in the other groups (P < .01). The median operative times (seconds) were 136.6, 66.4, and 62.3 in the robotic scope holder, expert, and novice groups, respectively. The operative time of the robotic scope holder group was significantly longer than that of the other groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A robotic scope holder can provide shorter camera movement owing to the stable holding and intentional scope manipulation by the operator, although it requires a longer operative time than a human assistant.

[Effect of methylene blue labeling on therapeutic effect and prognosis of gastric cancer patients in D2 radical gastrectomy under laparoscope].

Objective: To investigate the effect of methylene blue tracing on the effect of surgical resection and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients in D2 radical surgery under laparoscope. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 160 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical treatment in Xinxiang Central Hospital, the 4th Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical College from January 2016 to January 2019 were selected for retrospective analysis. Among them, 84 patients underwent laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer combined with methylene blue labeling operation (labeling group), and the other 76 patients underwent only laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (control group). The difference of intraoperative and postoperative recovery, lymph node dissection, and postoperative 3-year cumulative survival rate between the two groups were analyzed. Results: The age of patients in the labeled group and the control group were (64.9±7.8) and (66.0±8.3) years old, respectively (P=0.389); And the male patients accounted for 61.9% (52 cases) and 55.3% (42 cases), respectively (P=0.394); The operation time in the labeled group was (218.5±19.6) min, which was shorter than that in the control group (230.1±17.4) min (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the labeled group and the control group in the amount of bleeding during operation, the time of anal exhaust after operation, the time of eating after operation, the time of hospitalization after operation, and the average diameter of lymph nodes (P>0.05). The total number of dissected lymph nodes, D1 lymph nodes and D2 lymph nodes in the labeled group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P values<0.05). The operative complication rate in the labeled group was 11.9% (10 cases), which was lower than that in the control group (25.0%, 19 cases) (P=0.032); There was no statistical significance in 3-year cumulative survival rates of patients between the labeled group (61.9%) and the control group (52.6%) (χ2=3.46,P=0.065). Conclusion: The use of methylene blue tracing in laparoscopic D2 radical surgery for gastric cancer is beneficial to reduce the operation time, improve the lymph node clearance rate, and reduce surgical complications.

Mechanism underlying lens fogging and its countermeasure in laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: During laparoscopic surgery, visualization is fogged due to the influence of temperature. Fogging on the laparoscopic lens heightens the difficulty of the procedure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse thermodynamics in laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A temperature sensor was attached to the laparoscopic tip and the abdominal cavity of five swine under general anaesthesia. The laparoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity for five minutes after heating its tip with 65 °C saline for 10-300 s. The defogged laparoscope was wiped at room temperature for 10-300 s. Then, the laparoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity for five minutes. RESULTS: The temperature five minutes after insertion was similar for the 10-300 s heating durations (approximately 32.0 °C). There was no fogging when the laparoscope was wiped for 10-30 s. Two fogging events occurred when it was wiped for 60 s (temperature difference: -3.5 °C, -4.6 °C). Five fogging events were observed immediately after insertion when it was wiped for 300 s. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the heating time was more than ten seconds to prevent fogging. We found that fogging occurred when the laparoscopic tip temperature was 3.5 °C lower than the abdominal cavity temperature.

The introduction of wide-angle 270° laparoscopy through a novel laparoscopic camera system.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has enjoyed improvements over the last three decades primarily in achieving high definition, but the 70° field of view (FOV) remains unchanged. Complications related to events that take place out of the FOV continue to be reported. Additional problems leading to poor visualization are fogging and smoke accumulation. A novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was developed and dramatically expands the FOV from the 70° to 270° by adding side cameras at the distal tip of the laparoscope, while LED illumination eliminates fogging and improves smoke effects. This study describes the initial clinical experience with SurroundScope and its potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy. METHODS: SurroundScope was studied at Bnai Zion Medical Center in Israel and the Minnesota Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery in America. 27 laparoscopic surgeries were performed, and at the end of each procedure, evaluations were completed by all surgeons and camera holders. RESULTS: All 27 cases were completed successfully without adverse events. No injuries occurred as a result of surgical tool manipulation outside of the central frame while 133 potentially adverse events were identified on side frames. There was no fogging across the 27 cases. The impact of smoke was negligible in all cases, as laparoscope removal or venting was never necessary. Surgeon respondents indicated that tools could be followed from the port to the site of surgery without camera manipulation. Most surgeons strongly agreed that the potential to identify bleeding was improved. Camera holders strongly agreed that the ergonomics were improved and that they moved the camera less than with a standard laparoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results demonstrate numerous advantages for SurroundScope as compared to traditional laparoscopy. The important benefits of expanded FOV, complete lack of fogging, and negligible smoke may improve patient safety, reduce adverse events and the duration of surgery. Further investigation to quantify these benefits is recommended.

Effective cleaning of endoscopic lenses to achieve visual clarity for minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the recently available interventions to achieve optimal visual clarity in laparoscopic abdominopelvic surgery compared to conventional cleaning alternatives. Currently, there is no consensus on the most effective method for the cleaning of endoscopic lenses used in minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery. METHODS: Literature searching for articles relevant to answering a predefined research question was performed in December 2019 and involved searching of the electronic databases of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Registry, and EMBASE. Basic search terms were derived using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator and outcomes) framework and through a scoping search of literature via MEDLINE. A manual search of Google Scholar and citation screening of eligible studies was also performed to ensure the identification and inclusion of all pertinent studies to address the research question. RESULTS: Among conventional and readily available methods, the most effective approaches involved heated sterile water, heating of laparoscope lenses, and surfactant solutions, including FRED and Ultra-Stop, while evaluations of all novel devices and methods were more effective than controls, which included lens wiping systems and air and carbon dioxide flow systems. While the former surgical techniques were consistently associated with superior lens cleaning ability and/or defogging capability and subsequent optical clarity of images within the surgical field, no methods conferred any meaningful effects upon other clinically important outcomes, such as operative time, costs, complication rates and length of stay, suggesting that decision making concerning the selection of lens cleaning method/device should suit the preferences of the instrument operator and/or the responsible surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a range of endoscopic lens cleaning methods and devices can be used to achieve sufficient optical clarity of the laparoscopic surgical field through either preventing lenses from fogging and/or facilitating the inter-operative cleaning of fouled lenses. Despite the various methods evaluated in this review, there were no significant differences in complication rates between the intervention and control groups.

Comparison of laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted repairs for pediatric inguinal hernia have gained gradual acceptance over the past decade. However, consensus about the optimal management is still lacking. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of a modified laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) versus open repair of pediatric hernias/hydrocele in a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of children who underwent laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC and open repair (OR) for inguinal hernia from 2014 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, laterality of hernia, surgical time and time to follow-up. We also reviewed and analyzed the evidence of recurrence, the incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), and other complications. RESULTS: In our cohort, 961 patients in the OR group and 1098 patients in the LPEC group were analyzed retrospectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the LPEC group (22.3 ± 3.5 min) than in the OR group (27.8 ± 5.9 min) for bilateral hernia repair (p < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence was 1.3% (13/1035) in the OR group and 0.5% (6/1182) in the LPEC group (p = 0.056). Iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred statistically more frequently in the OR group than in the LPEC group (0.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). In addition, the incidence of MCIH was 3.7% (33/887) in the OR group and 0.3% (3/1014) in the LPEC group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Comparing to open technique, laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC provides a simple and effective option for pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele repair with excellent outcomes, a low incidence of recurrence, and reduced MCIH.

Totally laparoscopic resection of right-sided colon cancer using transvaginal specimen extraction with a 10-mm-long abdominal incision.

BACKGROUND: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has been developed as a means of decreasing the incidence of surgical wound complications. We refined the procedure for totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction using the reduced port surgery technique with the ultimate goal of attenuating damage to the abdominal wall. We herein report this innovative technique and its short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on seven patients who underwent totally laparoscopic colectomy using transvaginal specimen extraction with a 10-mm-long abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer from January 2014 to December 2021. Two 5-mm ports were used in the procedure without laparotomy. Transverse transabdominal posterior colpotomy was then performed. We introduced a GelPOINT Mini advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) into the transvaginal route for the insertion of a laparoscope, forceps, and stapling device. Lymph node dissection and transection of the ileum and distal colon were performed with transvaginal assistance. A specimen was then extracted transvaginally. Intracorporeal functional end-to-end anastomosis was conducted using a linear stapler through the vagina. After the removal of GelPOINT Mini, the vaginal incision was closed transvaginally. RESULTS: Seven patients successfully underwent this procedure. Median operative time was 219 min (range 174-255 min), median blood loss was 23 ml (range 10-37 ml), median number of harvested lymph nodes was 21 (range 17-35 lymph nodes) and median margins were 17.0 cm (range 9.0-25.0 cm) for the proximal margin and 9.5 cm (range 5.0-13.0 cm) for the distal margin. There were no complications more severe than Clavien-Dindo Grade II and there was no mortality. The median frequency of use intravenous analgesics from postoperative day 1 to discharge was once. Two patients did not require analgesics. A node-positive patient developed recurrence at the lung and paraaortic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure appears to be feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable for selected cases.

Surgeon Assessment of a Novel Multi-Resolution Foveated Laparoscope.

BACKGROUND: We developed a multi-resolution foveated laparoscope (MRFL) to improve situational awareness in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed surgeon objective task performance and subjective attitudes with MRFL when used for box trainer tasks and porcine surgery. METHODS: The MRFL simultaneously obtains a wide-angle view and a magnified view. The 2 images are displayed simultaneously. 6 urologists and 2 general surgeons performed box trainer and porcine surgery tasks with the MRFL and a standard laparoscope. Task time, use of display options, and subjective assessments were obtained. RESULTS: Subjectively, surgeons rated situational awareness, depth perception, and instrument interference as comparable between the prototype MRFL and laparoscope for trainer tasks. For porcine surgery, the MRFL was rated as having less interference than the standard laparoscope. The image quality of the MRFL was rated interior to the standard laparoscope. Participants found the different viewing modes useful for different roles and reported that they would likely use the MRFL for conventional laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Objectively, box trainer task time was comparable for 2 of 3 tasks with the remaining task shorter for the standard laparoscope. Porcine nephrectomy and oophorectomy were feasible with the prototype MRFL, although nephrectomy task time was significantly longer than traditional laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The MRFL demonstrated feasibility for performing complex surgery. Surgeons had favorable attitudes toward its features and likelihood to use the device if available. Users utilized different view types for different tasks. Longer MRFL task times were attributed to poorer image quality of the prototype.

Comparison of 30-degree and 0-degree laparoscopes in the visualisation of the inferior epigastric vessel, rectus abdominis muscle and bladder dome in gynaecologic laparoscopy.

Clear visualisation of the inferior epigastric vessel and bladder dome is important to avoid ancillary port injury. In this prospective cohort study, 52 videos of gynaecologic laparoscopies performed at Songklanagarind Hospital were scored by three expert and three non-expert surgeons in terms of visualisation quality and confidence level in identifying the inferior epigastric vessel, rectus abdominis muscle and bladder dome using 0-degree and 30-degree laparoscopes. No significant difference was reported between the laparoscopes regarding both visualisation quality and confidence level in identifying these three landmarks. When using the 30-degree laparoscope, expert surgeons reported significantly higher visual rating scale scores for both visualisation quality and confidence level than did non-expert surgeons (7.6 (5.3-8.6) vs. 6.5 (4.4-8.3); p=.04 and 7.3 (5.7-8.6) vs. 6.2 (5.2-7.5); p=.02). In conclusion, the two laparoscope angles were similar in terms of both visualisation quality and confidence level in visualising the inferior epigastric vessel and bladder dome.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Most laparoscopic complications associated with vascular and bladder injuries occur during the process of abdominal penetration. The 30-degree laparoscope tends to be superior to the 0-degree laparoscope in terms of visualisation in the lateral axis. A previous study reported the benefits of using the 30-degree laparoscope in urologic surgery. Data related to the degree of the laparoscope suitable for avoiding abdominal wall injuries are lacking.What do the results of this study add? We demonstrated that both 0- and 30-degree laparoscopes were similar in terms of visualisation and confidence level for the identification of the inferior epigastric vessel and bladder dome. Using the 30-degree laparoscope, expert surgeons reported higher scores for the visualisation of the inferior epigastric vessel than did non-expert surgeons.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Before ancillary port penetration, we recommend using either a 30-degree or 0-degree laparoscope to visualise the inferior epigastric vessel and bladder dome. For non-expert surgeons, a learning curve is required to improve the visualisation quality and confidence level for identifying these landmarks, especially using the 30-degree laparoscope.

Omnidirectional camera and head-mount display contribute to the safety of laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: We focused on the availability of an omnidirectional camera and head-mount display (HMD). If the laparoscope is an omnidirectional camera, captured images are sent to the HMD worn by the operator in real time. The operator can thus view the image as they like without moving the camera and obtain a 360° view intuitively. However, the surgical system that can be used for actual laparoscopic operations has not yet been developed. In this study, we aimed to show that an omnidirectional camera and HMD would be useful in laparoscopic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven medical students and twelve surgical residents (Surgeons group) participated in this study. We created an experimental box with five marks randomly attached inside the box, and the inside cannot be seen from the outside. We measured the time it took to identify all marks between conventional laparoscope and substitute system in each group. RESULTS: In the substitute system, the time required for the task was significantly shorter than with conventional laparoscopy in each group. CONCLUSION: An omnidirectional camera and HMD may be a useful new device for laparoscopic surgery. This system may help improve the safety of laparoscopic surgery.