RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triplet or quadruplet therapies incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies have led to prolonged survival among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, most patients have a relapse. Frontline lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in lenalidomide-exposed patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Disease response and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients underwent randomization; 155 were assigned to the BPd group, and 147 to the PVd group. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, <0.1 to 39.2), the 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 78), as compared with 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). Data on overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with a response to treatment (partial response or better) was 77% (95% CI, 70 to 84) in the BPd group and 72% (95% CI, 64 to 79) in the PVd group; 40% (95% CI, 32 to 48) and 16% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively, had a complete response or better. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group. Ocular events occurred in 89% of the patients who received BPd (grade 3 or 4 in 43%) and 30% of those who received PVd (grade 3 or 4 in 2%); ocular events in the BPd group were managed with belantamab mafodotin dose modification. Ocular events led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients in the BPd group and in no patients in the PVd group. CONCLUSIONS: Among lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, BPd conferred a significantly greater benefit than PVd with respect to progression-free survival, as well as deeper, more durable responses. Ocular events were common but were controllable by belantamab mafodotin dose modification. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-8 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04484623; EudraCT number, 2018-004354-21.).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Talidomida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Recurrencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Oftalmopatías/inducido químicamente , Oftalmopatías/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The identification of oncogenic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has led to the development of drugs that target essential survival pathways, but whether targeting multiple survival pathways may be curative in DLBCL is unknown. METHODS: We performed a single-center, phase 1b-2 study of a regimen of venetoclax, ibrutinib, prednisone, obinutuzumab, and lenalidomide (ViPOR) in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. In phase 1b, which included patients with DLBCL and indolent lymphomas, four dose levels of venetoclax were evaluated to identify the recommended phase 2 dose, with fixed doses of the other four drugs. A phase 2 expansion in patients with germinal-center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB DLBCL was performed. ViPOR was administered every 21 days for six cycles. RESULTS: In phase 1b of the study, involving 20 patients (10 with DLBCL), a single dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 intracranial hemorrhage occurred, a result that established venetoclax at a dose of 800 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. Phase 2 included 40 patients with DLBCL. Toxic effects that were observed among all the patients included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (in 24% of the cycles), thrombocytopenia (in 23%), anemia (in 7%), and febrile neutropenia (in 1%). Objective responses occurred in 54% of 48 evaluable patients with DLBCL, and complete responses occurred in 38%; complete responses were exclusively in patients with non-GCB DLBCL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 (or both). Circulating tumor DNA was undetectable in 33% of the patients at the end of ViPOR therapy. With a median follow-up of 40 months, 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 47) and 36% (95% CI, 23 to 49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ViPOR was associated with durable remissions in patients with specific molecular DLBCL subtypes and was associated with mainly reversible adverse events. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03223610.).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Lenalidomida , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Piperidinas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/efectos adversos , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Adenina/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Mass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma-derived monoclonal proteins in the peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during posttransplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of posttransplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, or with lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in the PB in the posttransplant setting, despite unavailability of pretreatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in the PB and paired bone marrow (BM) MRD results at the 10-5 threshold, assessed by either next-generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which, in landmark analysis, reached statistical significance after 18 cycles after transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared with MRD negativity by only 1 modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold. Overall, posttransplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293.
Asunto(s)
Espectrometría de Masas , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/sangre , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Neoplasia Residual , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Proteínas de Mieloma/análisis , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Adulto , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Although initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is not standardized, bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) is commonly used in older patients. Rituximab (R) maintenance after induction is often used. Thus, the open-label, randomized phase 2 ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group E1411 trial was designed to test 2 questions: (1) does addition of bortezomib to BR induction (BVR) and/or (2) addition of lenalidomide to rituximab (LR) maintenance improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with treatment-naïve MCL? From 2012 to 2016, 373 previously untreated patients, 87% aged ≥60 years, were enrolled in this trial. At a median follow-up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in the median PFS of BR compared with BVR (5.5 vs 6.4 years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.16). There were no unexpected additional toxicities with BVR treatment compared with BR, with no impact on total dose/duration of treatment received. Independent of the induction treatment, addition of lenalidomide did not significantly improve PFS, with median PFS in R vs LR (5.9 vs 7.2 years; HR, 0.84; 90% CI, 0.62-1.15). Most patients completed the planned 24 cycles of LR at the scheduled dose. In summary, adding bortezomib to BR induction does not prolong PFS in treatment-naïve MCL, and LR maintenance was not associated with longer PFS compared with R alone after BR. Nonetheless, the >5-year median PFS outcomes in this prospective cooperative group trial indicate the efficacy of BR followed by R maintenance as highly effective initial therapy for older patients with MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01415752.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Bortezomib , Lenalidomida , Linfoma de Células del Manto , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Rituximab , Humanos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células del Manto/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: It remains elusive how driver mutations, including those detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), affect prognosis in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we performed targeted-capture sequencing using bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) and ctDNA of 261 RRMM cases uniformly treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. We detected 24 and 47 recurrently mutated genes in BMPC and ctDNA, respectively. In addition to clonal hematopoiesis-associated mutations, varying proportion of driver mutations, particularly TP53 mutations (59.2% of mutated cases), were present in only ctDNA, suggesting their subclonal origin. In univariable analyses, ctDNA mutations of KRAS, TP53, DIS3, BRAF, NRAS, and ATM were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). BMPC mutations of TP53 and KRAS were associated with inferior PFS, whereas KRAS mutations were prognostically relevant only when detected in both BMPC and ctDNA. A total number of ctDNA mutations in the 6 relevant genes was a strong prognostic predictor (2-year PFS rates: 57.3%, 22.7%, and 0% for 0, 1, and ≥2 mutations, respectively) and independent of clinical factors and plasma DNA concentration. Using the number of ctDNA mutations, plasma DNA concentration, and clinical factors, we developed a prognostic index, classifying patients into 3 categories with 2-year PFS rates of 57.9%, 28.6%, and 0%. Serial analysis of ctDNA mutations in 94 cases revealed that TP53 and KRAS mutations frequently emerge after therapy. Thus, we clarify the genetic characteristics and clonal architecture of ctDNA mutations and demonstrate their superiority over BMPC mutations for prognostic prediction in RRMM. This study is a part of the C16042 study, which is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03433001.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Compuestos de Boro , ADN Tumoral Circulante , Dexametasona , Glicina , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Pronóstico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , ADN Tumoral Circulante/sangre , Compuestos de Boro/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Boro/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mutación , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genéticaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: High-risk (HR) cytogenetics are associated with poor outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and dedicated studies should address this difficult-to-treat population. The phase 2 study 2018-04 from the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome evaluated feasibility of an intensive strategy with quadruplet induction and consolidation plus tandem transplant in HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM. HR cytogenetics were defined by presence of del(17p), t(4;14), and/or t(14;16). Treatment consisted of daratumumab-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (D-KRd) induction, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), D-KRd consolidation, second ASCT, and daratumumab-lenalidomide maintenance. The primary end point was feasibility. Fifty patients with previously untreated NDMM were included. Median age was 57. Del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16) were found in 40%, 52%, and 20% of patients, respectively. At data cutoff, the study met the primary end point with 36 patients completing second transplant. Twenty patients discontinued the study due to stem cell collection failure (n = 8), disease progression (n = 7), adverse event (n = 4), or consent withdrawal (n = 1). Grade 3 to 4 D-KRd induction/consolidation-related adverse events (>5% of patients) were neutropenia (39%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (7%), and infection (6%). The overall response rate was 100% for patients completing second transplant, including 81% complete response. Premaintenance minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (10-6) was 94%. After a median follow-up of 33 months, the 30-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 80% and 91%, respectively. In conclusion, D-KRd with tandem transplant is feasible in patients with HR TE-NDMM and resulted in high response rates and PFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03606577.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adulto , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the effect of adding autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) to triplet therapy (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [RVD]), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy until disease progression, is unknown. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, adults (18 to 65 years of age) with symptomatic myeloma received one cycle of RVD. We randomly assigned these patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two additional RVD cycles plus stem-cell mobilization, followed by either five additional RVD cycles (the RVD-alone group) or high-dose melphalan plus ASCT followed by two additional RVD cycles (the transplantation group). Both groups received lenalidomide until disease progression, unacceptable side effects, or both. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: Among 357 patients in the RVD-alone group and 365 in the transplantation group, at a median follow-up of 76.0 months, 328 events of disease progression or death occurred; the risk was 53% higher in the RVD-alone group than in the transplantation group (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.91; P<0.001); median progression-free survival was 46.2 months and 67.5 months. The percentage of patients with a partial response or better was 95.0% in the RVD-alone group and 97.5% in the transplantation group (P = 0.55); 42.0% and 46.8%, respectively, had a complete response or better (P = 0.99). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 78.2% and 94.2%, respectively; 5-year survival was 79.2% and 80.7% (hazard ratio for death, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with multiple myeloma, RVD plus ASCT was associated with longer progression-free survival than RVD alone. No overall survival benefit was observed. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; DETERMINATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01208662.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Mieloma Múltiple , Trasplante de Células Madre , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/cirugía , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
Triplet regimen comprising proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and dexamethasone (DEX) is a recommended induction/consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients eligible for transplant. In this Japanese phase II study conducted from 2017 to 2019, newly diagnosed MM patients aged 20-65 received four induction cycles with bortezomib (Bor), lenalidomide (Len), and DEX (VRD), followed by Bor and high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue. Subsequently, they underwent four consolidation cycles with carfilzomib, Len, and DEX (KRD), followed by Len maintenance until disease progression. A total of 141 patients were analyzed. In an intent-to-treat population, the complete or better response post induction was 19.9%, rising to 39.7%, 58.9%, and 62.4% after transplant, consolidation, and 1-year maintenance, respectively. With a median follow-up of 38 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 83.5% and the 3-year overall survival rate was 92.5%. Severe adverse events (≥grade 3) occurred in ~30% of patients; however, there was no treatment-related mortality. These findings clearly showed the tolerability and effectiveness of this protocol. Nevertheless, patients with high-risk cytogenetics showed a trend toward lower 3-year PFS than those without (77.8% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.051), and ultra-high-risk cytogenetics (≥2 high-risk cytogenetics) had an even worse prognosis, with 61.2% 3-year PFS. To overcome this situation, a more potent treatment strategy incorporating novel agents such as the CD38-antibody should be assessed in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Trasplante Autólogo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Adulto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Consolidación/métodos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto Joven , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
The growing use of frontline lenalidomide treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) is increasing the proportion of lenalidomide-refractory patients, which may limit the efficacy of subsequent lines of treatment (LOT). This systematic literature review (January 2008-October 2023) of clinical trials (CT) and real-world studies (RW) assessed treatment outcomes in adults with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) who were previously treated with ≥1 LOT, progressed and were lenalidomide-refractory. Medline, EMBASE and additional electronic databases were searched for articles published in English. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall/objective response rate (ORR); 24 CT and 19 RW were included. For CT, the population-weighted mean of median PFS (CT = 14) and OS (CT = 6) were shorter in the lenalidomide-refractory cohort (months: 8.8 [n = 2699] and 21.7 [n = 1066], respectively) than the intent-to-treat population (months: 13.8 [n = 5380] and 35.9 [n = 2264], respectively); the population-weighted (N = 2142) mean ORR for lenalidomide-refractory patients (CT = 18) was 56.0%. RW reported considerable variation in PFS (RW = 7), OS (RW = 8) and ORR (RW = 8); and median PFS (RW = 2; months) was lower in lenalidomide/bortezomib-refractory (5.5/5.5; n = 81/n = 25) versus lenalidomide-refractory (7.3/8.0; n = 81/n = 61) patients. These data provide evidence that clinical trials and real-world outcomes are suboptimal in lenalidomide-refractory patients with RRMM, highlighting the need to improve treatment options for this population.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare lymphoproliferative neoplasm considered incurable, with a median survival of 3-5 years. In recent years, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have been introduced, demonstrating high therapeutic activity. However, the prognosis for MCL patients failing ibrutinib therapy is particularly poor, with a survival expectation of a few months. In this phase II trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of the carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) combination in MCL patients who were relapsed/refractory (R/R) or intolerant to BTKi and in need of treatment. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the KRD combination in terms of 12-month overall survival (12-month OS). From September 2019 to December 2020, 16 patients were enrolled from 11 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 2.37 months (95% CI 0.92-6.47), the 12-month OS was 13%. The rate of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) was 35%, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 19%. These results led to the premature termination of enrollment, as defined in the protocol stopping rules. The efficacy of the KRD combination in advanced-stage MCL patients who are R/R to BTKi is unsatisfactory and too toxic.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Linfoma de Células del Manto , Oligopéptidos , Humanos , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/mortalidad , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Masculino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Agammaglobulinemia Tirosina Quinasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Italia , Resistencia a AntineoplásicosRESUMEN
Due in part to racial disparities and underrepresentation in clinical studies, optimal therapies for Black patients with multiple myeloma remain undefined. This final analysis of GRIFFIN by race showed that the addition of daratumumab (D) to lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) provides clinical benefit among both Black and White transplant-eligible newly diagnosed patients compared with RVd alone. However, Black patients were more likely to discontinue ≥1 drug due to treatment-emergent adverse events. In summary, these findings suggest a benefit of D-RVd front-line therapy among Black and White patients and underscore the importance of equitable treatment access for all patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Negro o Afroamericano , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , BlancoRESUMEN
In Australia, bortezomib-based induction (V-IND) is used in >90% of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Four cycles of V-IND with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone are available via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients who demonstrate suboptimal response or who are refractory to V-IND demonstrate inferior survival, representing a subgroup of MM where an unmet need persists. We evaluated an early, response-adapted approach in these patients by switching to an intensive sequential therapeutic strategy incorporating daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone-based (DRd) salvage, high-dose melphalan ASCT followed by DRd consolidation and R maintenance. The overall response rate following four cycles of DRd salvage was 72% (95% credible interval: 57.9-82.4); prespecified, dual, Bayesian proof-of-concept criteria were met. Euro-flow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was 46% in the intention-to-treat population and 79% in the evaluable population following 12 cycles of DRd consolidation. At the 24-month follow-up, median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. DRd salvage was well tolerated with grade 3 and 4 events reported in 24% and 8% respectively. Response-adapted DRd combined with ASCT achieves high rates of MRD negativity and durable disease control in this functional high-risk group.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Terapia Recuperativa , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre HematopoyéticasRESUMEN
Therapeutic strategies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) have considerably improved during the last 10 years. The IFM2014-03 trial proposed an all-oral triplet induction/consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible NDMM patients, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Induction consisted of three 21-day cycles of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd), before high-dose Melphalan with transplant followed by eight 28-day cycles of IRd consolidation before 13 cycles of lenalidomide maintenance. Forty-six patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of therapy, and 39 entered the maintenance phase. The primary end-point was stringent complete response after consolidation, and was achieved in nine patients (20.9%, 90% CI 11.4-33.7; p = 0.998). Ten patients (24.4%) had an undetectable minimal residual disease. The overall response rate was 95.7%. The 3-year progression-free survival was 66.3%. No unexpected toxicities were recorded, and only eight patients suspended from any study drug. Of note, 21 (45.7%) patients reported peripheral neuropathy (PN) (grades 1-2 with no serious adverse events). IRd induction and consolidation with transplant before lenalidomide maintenance shows lower response rates compared to other triplet therapies. It could be an alternative for patients who require an all-oral regimen and/or with pre-existent PN, especially if quadruplet regimens including anti-CD38 antibody are not available.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Compuestos de Boro , Dexametasona , Glicina , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Anciano , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Glicina/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Boro/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Boro/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Boro/efectos adversos , Adulto , Quimioterapia de Consolidación/métodos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodosRESUMEN
Preclinical and clinical data demonstrate synergy between belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) and immunomodulatory drugs with limited overlapping toxicities. We investigated the safety and efficacy of belamaf with lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly (belamaf-Rd) in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Thirty-six patients (median age, 72.5 years) were randomized to receive belamaf at three different doses (2.5, 1.9, or 1.4 mg/kg) every 8 weeks. The dosing schedule was extended to every 12 weeks to mitigate ocular toxicity. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events were fatigue (n=21, 58.3%), rash (n=6, 16.7%), diarrhea (n=8, 22.2%) and COVID-19 (n=5, 13.9%). Grade 3-4 ocular adverse events, comprising visual acuity decline from baseline and/or keratopathy, were reported in 39/216 (18.1%), 33/244 (13.5%), and 26/207 (12.6%) ophthalmological assessments in the 2.5, 1.9, and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Importantly, grade 3-4 keratopathy was identified in 9/216 (4.2%), 1/244 (0.4%) and 1/207(0.5%) assessments. Most patients (32/36, 88.9%) were treated with the extended, every-12-week schedule, during which 40, 33 and 16 doses were withheld due to ocular adverse events in the 2.5, 1.9, and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Overall, the rates of very good partial response and better and complete response and better were 83.3% and 52.8%, respectively, without significant differences among cohorts. Over a median follow-up of 20.3 months no disease progression was reported; six patients discontinued treatment due to infection-related death (4 cases of COVID-19, 2 cases of pneumonia) and one patient withdrew consent. Based on the toxicity/efficacy balance, the recommended phase II dose was 1.9 mg/kg every 8 weeks, extended to every 12 weeks because of toxicity. In conclusion, Belamaf-Rd, with the extended schedule for belamaf, showed important clinical activity and a significant improvement of ocular adverse events with minimal impact on vision-related functioning in an elderly, non-transplant eligible population.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales HumanizadosRESUMEN
TOURMALINE-MM1, the only blinded randomized study in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; ≥1 prior therapy) in the last 10 years, investigated ixazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (IRd) versus lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd). Final overall survival (OS) data were based on a median follow-up of 85 months. In RRMM trials where patients have had 1-3 relapses after initial treatment, a high proportion receive subsequent therapy. Application of salvage therapies in blinded trials and newer modes of therapy can increasingly complicate the interpretation of OS. This analysis explores the impact of subsequent therapies on OS outcomes in TOURMALINE-MM1. The inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) method, marginal structural model (MSM), and rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM) were utilized to adjust for confounding on OS, introduced by subsequent therapies. Analyses were conducted for the intent-totreat (ITT) population and ≥2 prior lines subgroup. Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for IRd versus Rd was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.13) in the ITT population. After adjusting for the impact of subsequent therapies by the RPSFTM method, estimated HR for IRd versus Rd in the ITT population was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-1.07). Adjusting with IPCW and MSM methods also showed an improvement in HR, favoring IRd. IRd may be particularly beneficial in patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy (IPCW and MSM HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.88; RPSFTM HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.91). These analyses highlight the growing challenge of demonstrating OS benefit in MM patients and the importance of assessing confounding introduced by subsequent therapies when interpreting OS.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Compuestos de Boro , Dexametasona , Glicina , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Compuestos de Boro/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Boro/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD), and bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD), are commonly used in induction regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in China. This real-world study enrolled 390 patients, 195 receiving VRD and 195 receiving PAD induction. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and stringent complete remission/complete remission. Across the entire cohort, VRD demonstrated significantly improved five-year overall survival (OS) (74% vs. 59%, p = 0.0024) and five-year PFS (67% vs. 37%, p = 0.0018) compared to PAD. Notably, the median OS and PFS were not reached for VRD-treated patients, while they were 77 months (60-not reached [NR]) and 46 months (36-NR), respectively, for PAD. In patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, VRD showed superior five-year OS (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.0038) and PFS (78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0091) compared to PAD. However, these differences were not statistically significant in high-risk patients. For transplanted patients, VRD was associated with superior five-year OS (91% vs. 67%, p = 0.014) and PFS (79% vs. 47%, p = 0.015) compared to PAD. In non-transplanted patients, VRD showed a trend towards improved five-year OS (p = 0.085) and PFS (p = 0.073) compared to the PAD group. In conclusion, VRD displayed superior OS and PFS outcomes in standard-risk patients and those who underwent transplantation. These findings suggest potential advantages of VRD over PAD in real-world clinical settings for NDMM treatment. However, due to the imbalance in transplantation rates between the VRD and PAD groups, limitations in testing for high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA), and the difference between the received cycles and salvage therapies, the conclusions of this study should be interpreted with caution.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Doxorrubicina , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Daratumumab-based regimens are the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study. However, real-world data on daratumumab efficacy in upfront therapy in unselected patients are scanty. In the framework of a prospective observational study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in 88 newly diagnosed patients, including subjects with IIIb cardiac stage (26%) or myeloma defining events (29%). Daratumumab was administered with bortezomib in 50 (56%) patients, lenalidomide in 31 (35%), and monotherapy in 7 (8%). The rate of serious adverse events was low (16%). The overall hematologic response rate was 75% with 52 (59%) patients attaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) at six months. Amongst patients evaluable for organ response, the rate of cardiac and renal responses at 6 months was 31% and 21%, respectively. Comparing stage IIIb patients with the remaining ones, the rate of profound hematologic response was not significantly different (≥VGPR 57% vs. 59%, p 0.955) likewise the rate of cardiac (33% vs. 30%, p 0.340) and renal (40% vs. 16%, p 0.908) responses. Daratumumab-based regimens demonstrated to be safe and effective in treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis even in advanced stage disease.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anciano , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Adulto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This case report describes the clinical course of a patient with relapsed IgA kappa multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics. Initially treated with daratumumab-bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Dara-VRD) then transitioned to lenalidomide maintenance. However, he experienced a relapse and was treated with carfilzomib-based therapy (CFZ) but developed drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (DI-TMA). Despite receiving eculizumab and supportive care, the patient's condition worsened, leading to encephalopathy and refractory gastrointestinal bleeding in the setting of persistent thrombocytopenia. Ultimately, the decision was made to transition to comfort-focused care. DI-TMA has been documented with various proteasome inhibitors such as ixazomib and bortezomib. Additionally, other medications such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and interferon have been associated with DI-TMA as well (Pisoni et al. (Drug Saf 24:491-501, 2001) [18]). Here we discuss a case of carfilzomib-induced TMA (CFZ-TMA) refractory to eculizumab as well as a review of the published literature.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Humanos , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/inducido químicamente , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The roles of Lenalidomide (Len) and Daratumumab (Dara) in multiple myeloma treatment are well-established, yet their influences on hematopoietic stem cell harvesting and reconstitution remain disputed. METHODS: We conducted a systematic database review to identify cohort studies or RCTs evaluating the effect of the use of Len or Dara on hematopoietic stem cell collection and peripheral blood count recovery in multiple myeloma patients. Effects on hematopoietic collection or reconstitution were estimated by comparing standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD), or median differences. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant studies were identified, summarizing mobilization results. For Len, data from 13 studies were summarized, including total CD34+ cell yield, collection failure rate, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Results indicated that Len exposure led to decreased stem cell collection [SMD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.34, -0.12)]. However, collection failure (<2×106) could be mitigated by plerixafor [OR=2.14, 95% CI (0.96, 4.77)]. For Dara, two RCTs and three cohort studies were included, showing that Dara exposure resulted in a reduction in total stem cells even with optimized plerixafor mobilization [SMD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.26, -0.23)], and delayed platelet engraftment recovery [MD=1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.66)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis offers a comprehensive view of Len and Dara's impacts on hematopoietic stem cell collection and reconstitution in multiple myeloma. Len usage could lead to reduced stem cell collection, counteracted by plerixafor mobilization. Dara usage could result in diminished stem cell collection and delayed platelet engraftment.