Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.759
Filtrar
Más filtros

Colección CLAP
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S662-S668, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299461

RESUMEN

A primary goal of obstetrical practice is the optimization of maternal and perinatal health. This goal translates into a seemingly simple assessment with regard to considerations of the timing of delivery: delivery should occur when the benefits are greater than those of continued pregnancy. In the absence of an indication for cesarean delivery, planned delivery is initiated with induction of labor. When medical or obstetrical complications exist, they may guide recommendations regarding the timing of delivery. In the absence of these complications, gestational age also has been used to guide delivery timing, given its association with both maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. If there is no medical indication, delivery before 39 weeks has been discouraged, given its association with greater chances of adverse perinatal outcomes. Conversely, it has been recommended that delivery occur by 42 weeks of gestation, given the perinatal risks that accrue in the post-term period. Historically, a 39-week induction of labor, particularly for individuals with no previous birth, has not been routinely offered in the absence of medical or obstetrical indications. That approach was based on numerous observational studies that demonstrated an increased risk of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes among individuals who underwent labor induction compared to those in spontaneous labor. However, from a management and person-centered-choice perspective, the relevant comparison is between those undergoing planned labor induction at a given time vs those planning to continue pregnancy beyond that time. When individuals have been compared using that rubric-either in observational studies or randomized trials that have been performed in a wide variety of locations and populations- there has not been evidence that induction increases adverse perinatal or maternal outcomes. Conversely, even when the only indication for delivery is the achievement of a full-term gestational age, evidence suggests that multiple different outcomes, including cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal respiratory impairment, and perinatal mortality, are less likely when induction is performed. This information underscores the importance of making the preferences of pregnant individuals for different birth processes and outcomes central to the approach to delivery timing.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Parto , Resultado del Embarazo , Mortalidad Perinatal , Edad Gestacional
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 63(6): 764-771, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339783

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze perinatal risks associated with three distinct scenarios of fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy compared with a reference group. METHODS: This cohort study included women with a singleton pregnancy that delivered between 32 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation and had two or more ultrasound scans, at least 4 weeks apart, from 18 + 0 weeks. We evaluated three different scenarios of fetal growth against a reference group, which comprised appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses with appropriate forward-growth trajectory. The comparator growth trajectories were categorized as: Group 1, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses (estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) persistently < 10th centile) with appropriate forward growth; Group 2, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory (decrease of ≥ 50 centiles) and EFW or AC ≥ 10th centile (i.e. non-SGA) at their final ultrasound scan; and Group 3, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory and EFW or AC < 10th centile (i.e. SGA) at their final scan. The primary outcome was overall perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death). Secondary outcomes included stillbirth, delivery of a SGA infant, preterm birth, emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status and composite severe neonatal morbidity. Associations were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 5319 pregnancies. Compared to the reference group, the adjusted odds of perinatal mortality were increased significantly in Group 2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.00 (95% CI, 1.36-11.22)) and Group 3 (aOR, 7.71 (95% CI, 2.39-24.91)). Only Group 3 had increased odds of stillbirth (aOR, 5.69 (95% CI, 1.55-20.93)). In contrast, infants in Group 1 did not have significantly increased odds of demise. The odds of a SGA infant at birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, but was highest in Group 1 (aOR, 111.86 (95% CI, 62.58-199.95)) and Group 3 (aOR, 40.63 (95% CI, 29.01-56.92)). In both groups, more than 80% of infants were born SGA and nearly half had a birth weight < 3rd centile. Likewise, the odds of preterm birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, being highest in Group 3, with an aOR of 4.27 (95% CI, 3.23-5.64). Lastly, the odds of composite severe neonatal morbidity were increased in Groups 1 and 3, whereas the odds of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status were increased only in Group 3. CONCLUSION: Assessing the fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy can help identify infants at increased risk of perinatal mortality and birth weight < 3rd centile for gestation. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Fetal , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Mortalidad Perinatal , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/mortalidad , Mortinato/epidemiología , Peso Fetal , Estudios de Cohortes , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Nacimiento Prematuro
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 63(6): 746-757, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the types of brain injury and subsequent neurodevelopmental outcome in fetuses and neonates from pregnancies with twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Additionally, to determine risk factors for brain injury and to review the use of neuroimaging modalities in these cases. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive TTTS pregnancies treated with laser surgery in a single fetal therapy center between January 2010 and January 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of brain injury, classified into predefined groups. Secondary outcomes included adverse outcome (perinatal mortality or neurodevelopmental impairment), risk factors for brain injury and the number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. RESULTS: Cranial ultrasound was performed in all 466 TTTS pregnancies and in 685/749 (91%) liveborn neonates. MRI was performed in 3% of pregnancies and 4% of neonates. Brain injury was diagnosed in 16/935 (2%) fetuses and 37/685 (5%) neonates and all predefined injury groups were represented. Four fetal and four neonatal cases of cerebellar hemorrhage were detected. Among those with brain injury, perinatal mortality occurred in 11/16 (69%) fetuses and 8/37 (22%) neonates. Follow-up was available for 29/34 (85%) long-term survivors with brain injury and the mean age at follow-up was 46 months. Neurodevelopmental impairment was present in 9/29 (31%) survivors with brain injury. Adverse outcome occurred in 28/53 (53%) TTTS individuals with brain injury. The risk of brain injury was increased after recurrent TTTS/post-laser twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS) (odds ratio (OR), 3.095 (95% CI, 1.581-6.059); P = 0.001) and lower gestational age at birth (OR per 1-week decrease in gestational age, 1.381 (95% CI, 1.238-1.541); P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on dedicated neurosonography and limited use of MRI, brain injury was diagnosed in 2% of fetuses and 5% of neonates with TTTS. Adverse outcome was seen in over half of cases with brain injury. Brain injury was related to recurrent TTTS/post-laser TAPS and a lower gestational age at birth. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Feto-Fetal , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen , Humanos , Transfusión Feto-Fetal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuroimagen/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Encefálicas/etiología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Edad Gestacional , Mortalidad Perinatal , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/epidemiología , Terapia por Láser
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 263, 2024 Apr 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605299

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children exposed prenatally to alcohol or cannabinoids individually can exhibit growth deficits and increased risk for adverse birth outcomes. However, these drugs are often co-consumed and their combined effects on early brain development are virtually unknown. The blood vessels of the fetal brain emerge and mature during the neurogenic period to support nutritional needs of the rapidly growing brain, and teratogenic exposure during this gestational window may therefore impair fetal cerebrovascular development. STUDY DESIGN: To determine whether prenatal polysubstance exposure confers additional risk for impaired fetal-directed blood flow, we performed high resolution in vivo ultrasound imaging in C57Bl/6J pregnant mice. After pregnancy confirmation, dams were randomly assigned to one of four groups: drug-free control, alcohol-exposed, cannabinoid-exposed or alcohol-and-cannabinoid-exposed. Drug exposure occurred daily between Gestational Days 12-15, equivalent to the transition between the first and second trimesters in humans. Dams first received an intraperitoneal injection of either cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 (750 µg/kg) or volume-equivalent vehicle. Then, dams were placed in vapor chambers for 30 min of inhalation of either ethanol or room air. Dams underwent ultrasound imaging on three days of pregnancy: Gestational Day 11 (pre-exposure), Gestational Day 13.5 (peri-exposure) and Gestational Day 16 (post-exposure). RESULTS: All drug exposures decreased fetal cranial blood flow 24-hours after the final exposure episode, though combined alcohol and cannabinoid co-exposure reduced internal carotid artery blood flow relative to all other exposures. Umbilical artery metrics were not affected by drug exposure, indicating a specific vulnerability of fetal cranial circulation. Cannabinoid exposure significantly reduced cerebroplacental ratios, mirroring prior findings in cannabis-exposed human fetuses. Post-exposure cerebroplacental ratios significantly predicted subsequent perinatal mortality (p = 0.019, area under the curve, 0.772; sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 85.70%) and retroactively diagnosed prior drug exposure (p = 0.005; AUC, 0.861; sensitivity, 86.40%; specificity, 66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Fetal cerebrovasculature is significantly impaired by exposure to alcohol or cannabinoids, and co-exposure confers additional risk for adverse birth outcomes. Considering the rising potency and global availability of cannabis products, there is an imperative for research to explore translational models of prenatal drug exposure, including polysubstance models, to inform appropriate strategies for treatment and care in pregnancies affected by drug exposure.


Asunto(s)
Cannabinoides , Muerte Perinatal , Animales , Femenino , Ratones , Embarazo , Cannabinoides/efectos adversos , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Etanol/efectos adversos , Feto/irrigación sanguínea , Mortalidad Perinatal
5.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 365, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750467

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fetal movement monitoring is one of the strategies used to assess the fetus's health. Until now, most studies focused on the decreased fetal movement and neonatal outcome, although this systematic review and meta-analysis is designed to assess the association between increased fetal movements (IFM) with perinatal outcomes. METHOD: The electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies investigating the perinatal outcome of women with increased fetal movements from inception to July 2023. Following that, a random-effect meta-analysis model was used to obtain the combined diagnostic and predictive parameters including perinatal mortality (still birth and early neonatal mortality), operative delivery, Apgar score, neonatal resuscitation at birth and NICU Admission. RESULTS: After the initial screening, seven studies examining the association between increased third trimester fetal movement and various perinatal outcomes were included. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the risk of cesarean delivery among patients with IFM compared to controls, suggesting a potential protective effect during childbirth. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in birth weight, small or large for gestational age births, neonatal intensive care unit admission, maternal age, umbilical cord around the neck, gestational diabetes mellitus, and hypertension, indicating that IFM may not be a major predictor of adverse perinatal outcomes or maternal conditions. Notably, IFM was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of labor induction. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that IFM may have a protective effect against cesarean delivery. Additionally, IFM does not appear to be significantly associated with maternal age, umbilical cord around the neck, gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertension. However, the observed significant association with labor induction warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Movimiento Fetal , Resultado del Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Puntaje de Apgar
6.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 493, 2024 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) for a caesarean section is among the factors that reflect the quality of care a pregnant woman receives and the impact on maternal and foetal outcomes and should not exceed 30 min especially for Category 1 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Herein, we evaluated the effect of decision-to-delivery interval on the maternal and perinatal outcomes among emergency caesarean deliveries at a secondary health facility in north-central Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted a four-year retrospective descriptive analysis of all emergency caesarean sections at a secondary health facility in north-central Nigeria. We included pregnant mothers who had emergency caesarean delivery at the study site from February 10, 2017, to February 9, 2021. RESULTS: Out of 582 who underwent an emergency caesarean section, 550 (94.5%) had a delayed decision-to-delivery interval. The factors associated with delayed decision-to-delivery interval included educational levels (both parents), maternal occupation, and booking status. The delayed decision-to-delivery interval was associated with an increase in perinatal deaths with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.9 (95% CI, 3.166 to 15.040), and increased odds of Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) admissions (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.417 to 39.333). Among the maternal outcomes, delayed decision-to-delivery interval was associated with increased odds of sepsis (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.960 to 8.933), hypotension (OR 3.8, 95% 1.626 TO 9.035), and cardiac arrest (OR 19.5, 95% CI 4.634 to 82.059). CONCLUSION: This study shows a very low optimum DDI, which was associated with educational levels, maternal occupation, and booking status. The delayed DDI increased the odds of perinatal deaths, SCBU admission, and maternal-related complications.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Urgencias Médicas , Toma de Decisiones , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 62, 2024 Jan 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38218766

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Tanzania has one of the highest burdens of perinatal mortality, with a higher risk among urban versus rural women. To understand the characteristics of perinatal mortality in urban health facilities, study objectives were: I. To assess the incidence of perinatal deaths in public health facilities in Dar es Salaam and classify these into a) pre-facility stillbirths (absence of fetal heart tones on admission to the study health facilities) and b) intra-facility perinatal deaths before discharge; and II. To identify determinants of perinatal deaths by comparing each of the two groups of perinatal deaths with healthy newborns. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study among women who gave birth in five urban, public health facilities in Dar es Salaam. I. Incidence of perinatal death in the year 2020 was calculated based on routinely collected health facility records and the Perinatal Problem Identification Database. II. An embedded case-control study was conducted within a sub-population of singletons with birthweight ≥ 2000 g (excluding newborns with congenital malformations); pre-facility stillbirths and intra-facility perinatal deaths were compared with 'healthy newborns' (Apgar score ≥ 8 at one and ≥ 9 at five minutes and discharged home alive). Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the determinants of deaths. RESULTS: A total of 37,787 births were recorded in 2020. The pre-discharge perinatal death rate was 38.3 per 1,000 total births: a stillbirth rate of 27.7 per 1,000 total births and an intra-facility neonatal death rate of 10.9 per 1,000 live births. Pre-facility stillbirths accounted for 88.4% of the stillbirths. The case-control study included 2,224 women (452 pre-facility stillbirths; 287 intra-facility perinatal deaths and 1,485 controls), 99% of whom attended antenatal clinic (75% with more than three visits). Pre-facility stillbirths were associated with low birth weight (cOR 4.40; (95% CI: 3.13-6.18) and with maternal hypertension (cOR 4.72; 95% CI: 3.30-6.76). Intra-facility perinatal deaths were associated with breech presentation (aOR 40.3; 95% CI: 8.75-185.61), complications in the second stage (aOR 20.04; 95% CI: 12.02-33.41), low birth weight (aOR 5.57; 95% CI: 2.62-11.84), cervical dilation crossing the partograph's action line (aOR 4.16; 95% CI:2.29-7.56), and hypertension during intrapartum care (aOR 2.9; 95% CI 1.03-8.14), among other factors.  CONCLUSION: The perinatal death rate in the five urban hospitals was linked to gaps in the quality of antenatal and intrapartum care, in the study health facilities and in lower-level referral clinics. Urgent action is required to implement context-specific interventions and conduct implementation research to strengthen the urban referral system across the entire continuum of care from pregnancy onset to postpartum. The role of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy as a crucial determinant of perinatal deaths emphasizes the complexities of maternal-perinatal health within urban settings.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Incidencia , Hospitales Urbanos
8.
Birth ; 51(3): 521-529, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173333

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether induction of labor (IOL) is associated with cesarean birth (CB) and perinatal mortality in uncomplicated first births at term compared with expectant management outside the confines of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all births in Victoria, Australia, from 2010 to 2018 (n = 640,191). Preliminary analysis compared IOL at 37 weeks with expectant management at that gestational age and beyond for uncomplicated pregnancies. Similar comparisons were made for IOL at 38, 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation and expectant management. The primary analysis repeated these comparisons, limiting the population to nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancies and excluding those with a medical indication for IOL. We compared perinatal mortality between groups using Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression for all other comparisons. Adjusted odds ratios and 99% confidence intervals were reported. p < 0.01 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: Among nulliparous, uncomplicated pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation in Victoria, IOL increased from 24.6% in 2010 to 30.0% in 2018 (p < 0.001). In contrast to the preliminary analysis, the primary analysis showed that IOL in lower-risk nulliparous women was associated with increased odds of CB when performed at 38 (aOR 1.23(1.13-1.32)), 39 (aOR 1.31(1.23-1.40)), 40 (aOR 1.42(1.35-1.50)), and 41 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.43(1.35-1.51)). Perinatal mortality was rare in both groups and non-significantly lower in the induced group at most gestations. DISCUSSION: For lower-risk nulliparous women, the odds of CB increased with IOL from 38 weeks of gestation, along with decreased odds of perinatal mortality at 41 weeks only.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Paridad , Humanos , Femenino , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Victoria/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Edad Gestacional , Modelos Logísticos , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento a Término , Espera Vigilante , Adulto Joven
9.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1142, 2024 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infant mortality rates are reliable indices of the child and general population health status and health care delivery. The most critical factors affecting infant mortality are socioeconomic status and ethnicity. The aim of this study was to assess the association between socioeconomic disadvantage, ethnicity, and perinatal, neonatal, and infant mortality in Slovakia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The associations between socioeconomic disadvantage (educational level, long-term unemployment rate), ethnicity (the proportion of the Roma population) and mortality (perinatal, neonatal, and infant) in the period 2017-2022 were explored, using linear regression models. RESULTS: The higher proportion of people with only elementary education and long-term unemployed, as well as the higher proportion of the Roma population, increases mortality rates. The proportion of the Roma population had the most significant impact on mortality in the selected period between 2017 and 2022, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). CONCLUSIONS: Life in segregated Roma settlements is connected with the accumulation of socioeconomic disadvantage. Persistent inequities between Roma and the majority population in Slovakia exposed by mortality rates in children point to the vulnerabilities and exposures which should be adequately addressed by health and social policies.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Infantil , Mortalidad Perinatal , Romaní , Factores Socioeconómicos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo , COVID-19 , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Infantil/etnología , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Mortalidad Perinatal/etnología , Mortalidad Perinatal/tendencias , Romaní/estadística & datos numéricos , Eslovaquia/epidemiología , Disparidades Socioeconómicas en Salud
10.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 523, 2024 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39138454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perinatal mortality is a global health problem, especially in Ethiopia, which has the highest perinatal mortality rate. Studies about perinatal mortality were conducted in Ethiopia, but which factors specifically contribute to the change in perinatal mortality across time is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the trend and multivariate decomposition of perinatal mortality in Ethiopia using EDHS 2005-2016. METHODS: A community-based, cross-sectional study design was used. EDHS 2005-2016 data was used, and weighting has been applied to adjust the difference in the probability of selection. Logit-based multivariate decomposition analysis was used using STATA version 14.1. The best model was selected using the lowest AIC value, and variables were selected with a p-value less than 0.05 at 95% CI. RESULT: The trend of perinatal mortality in Ethiopia decreased from 37 per 1000 births in 2005 to 33 per 1000 births in 2016. About 83.3% of the decrease in perinatal mortality in the survey was attributed to the difference in the endowment (composition) of the women. Among the differences in the endowment, the difference in the composition of ANC visits, taking the TT vaccine, urban residence, occupation, secondary education, and birth attendant significantly decreased perinatal mortality in the last 10 years. Among the differences in coefficients, skilled birth attendants significantly decreased perinatal mortality. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The perinatal mortality rate in Ethiopia has declined over time. Variables like ANC visits, taking the TT vaccine, urban residence, occupation, secondary education, and skilled birth attendants reduce perinatal mortality. To reduce perinatal mortality more, scaling up maternal and newborn health services has a critical role.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Perinatal , Humanos , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Perinatal/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Análisis Multivariante , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Perinat Med ; 52(4): 361-368, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421237

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Triplet pregnancies involve several complications, the most important being prematurity as virtually all triplets are born preterm. We conducted this study to compare the outcomes of reduced vs. non-reduced triplet pregnancies managed in the largest tertiary hospital in Finland. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in the Helsinki University Hospital during 2006-2020. Data on the pregnancies, parturients and newborns were collected from patient records. The fetal number, chorionicity and amnionicity were defined in first-trimester ultrasound screening. The main outcome measures were perinatal and neonatal mortality of non-reduced triplets, compared to twins and singletons selectively reduced of triplet pregnancies. RESULTS: There were 57 initially triplet pregnancies and 35 of these continued as non-reduced triplets and resulted in the delivery of 104 liveborn children. The remaining 22 cases were spontaneously or medically reduced to twins (9) or singletons (13). Most (54.4 %) triplet pregnancies were spontaneous. There were no significant differences in gestational age at delivery between triplets (mean 33+0, median 34+0) and those reduced to twins (mean 32+5, median 36+0). The survival at one week of age was higher for triplets compared to twins (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnancies continued as non-reduced triplets, which were born at a similar gestational age but with a significantly higher liveborn rate compared to those reduced to twins. There were no early neonatal deaths among cases reduced to singletons. Prematurity was the greatest concern for multiples in this cohort, whereas the small numbers may explain the lack of difference in gestational age between these groups.


Asunto(s)
Resultado del Embarazo , Reducción de Embarazo Multifetal , Embarazo Triple , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embarazo Triple/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Finlandia/epidemiología , Adulto , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Reducción de Embarazo Multifetal/métodos , Reducción de Embarazo Multifetal/estadística & datos numéricos , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Trillizos , Edad Gestacional , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Mortalidad Perinatal/tendencias , Lactante
12.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(3): 1766-1777, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37806630

RESUMEN

Abortions and perinatal mortalities (APM) substantially affect cattle industry efficiency. Various infectious and noninfectious factors have been associated with bovine APM worldwide. Infections are often considered pivotal due to their abortifacient potential, leading laboratories to primarily investigate relevant infectious agents for APM cases. Some infectious causes, such as Brucella abortus, have also a zoonotic impact, necessitating monitoring for both animal and human health. However, underreporting of bovine APM is a global issue, affecting early detection of infectious and zoonotic causes. Previous studies identified factors influencing case submission, but regional characteristics may affect results. In Belgium, farmers are obliged to report cases of APM within the context of a national brucellosis monitoring program. The inclusion criteria for this monitoring program cover abortions (gestation length of 42-260 d) and perinatal mortalities of (pre)mature calves following a gestation length of more than 260 d, which were stillborn or died within 48 h after birth. The objective of the present study was to describe the evolution in submission of APM cases within a mandatory abortion monitoring program in relation to subsidized initiatives in the northern part of Belgium. Based on the proportion of APM submissions versus the proportion of bovine reproductive females, an APM proportion (APMPR) was calculated, and factors at both animal and herd level that may influence this APMPR were explored by using linear models. This evaluation revealed that the APMPR increased with the introduction of an extensive analytical panel of abortifacient agents and a free on-farm sample collection from 0.44% to 0.94%. Additionally, an increase of the APMPR was associated with an outbreak of an emerging abortifacient pathogen (Schmallenberg virus; 1.23%), and the introduction of a mandatory eradication program for bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDv; 1.20%). The APMPR was higher in beef compared with dairy cattle, and it was higher in winter compared with fall, spring, and summer. Smaller herds categorized in the first quartile had a higher APMPR compared with larger herds. Herds that submitted an APM in the previous year had a higher APMPR in the next year compared with herds without an APM submission. Finally, herds for which there was evidence of the presence of BVDv had a higher APMPR compared with herds without evidence of the presence of BVDv. In conclusion, the number of APM submissions increased after the introduction of a free on-farm sample collection and an extensive pathogen screening panel. Production type (beef), season (winter), smaller herd size, previous APM, and presence of BVDv seemed to have a positive effect on APMPR. However, even under mandatory circumstances, APM still seems to be underreported, since the APMPR was lower than the expected minimal rate of 2%. Therefore, further research is necessary to identify the drivers that convince farmers to submit APM cases to improve submission rates and ensure an efficient monitoring program for APM and eventually associated zoonotic pathogens.


Asunto(s)
Abortivos , Aprendizaje , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Animales , Bovinos , Mortinato/veterinaria , Mortalidad Perinatal , Bélgica/epidemiología
13.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(6): 3824-3835, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211691

RESUMEN

This closed cohort study aimed to identify the associations between dairy calf management practices and herd-level perinatal calf mortality risk. From February 2020 to June 2021, predominantly Holstein dairy farms in Québec (n = 1,832) and New Brunswick (n = 52), Canada, that were registered in the dairy herd improvement program were visited once. A questionnaire covering all aspects of precalving, calving, and colostrum management was administered. Data regarding perinatal mortality were retrieved from the dairy herd improvement program database for each farm for 2021. Perinatal mortality was calculated for each farm as the proportion of calves dead at birth or dying within 24 h after birth. A multivariable negative binomial model was used to assess herd-level factors associated with the risk of perinatal mortality. The final model included the lying surface in the calving area, the typical time to first colostrum intake, typical cow-calf contact time, the proportion of males born, the proportion of assisted calvings, and herd size. Herd-level perinatal mortality risk ranged from 0% to 38.1% (mean ± SE = 7.6% ± 0.1%). A greater proportion of males born, a higher proportion of assisted calvings, and delayed colostrum feeding were associated with increased herd-level perinatal mortality. Factors associated with a decreased herd-level perinatal mortality risk were having a typical cow-calf contact time between 7 and 12 h after calving compared with reduced cow-calf contact time, soft lying surfaces in the calving area compared with concrete and mat-lying surfaces, and an increased number of calvings per year. Our results show that although some of the significant risk factors are not well understood (i.e., calving area lying surface, typical cow-calf contact time), Canadian farmers could focus on the factors under their control (i.e., time to first colostrum feeding, proportion of difficult calvings, males born, and calvings per year) to reduce the risk of perinatal mortality. Future work should focus on qualitative research to understand the dairy farmer motivations and limitations to implementing practices identified in this and other studies to reduce perinatal mortality.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Bovinos , Industria Lechera , Mortalidad Perinatal , Femenino , Masculino , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Ropa de Cama y Ropa Blanca/veterinaria , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Vivienda para Animales/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Estadísticos , Nuevo Brunswick/epidemiología , Muerte Perinatal , Quebec/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Mortinato/veterinaria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Animales
14.
Epidemiol Prev ; 48(2): 140-148, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38770731

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to describe the results of a pilot population-based perinatal mortality surveillance system, with regards to stillbirths; to study maternal, obstetric, and foetal characteristics, evaluating risk factors and understanding causes. DESIGN: a cross-sectional study was conducted on incident cases of stillbirths collected by the surveillance system from July 2017 to June 2019 in three Italian Regions (Lombardy, Tuscany, and Sicily). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: data on stillbirths, resulting from the in-hospital multidisciplinary audits, organised using the Significant Event Audit methodology, were analysed. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions, the project identified stillbirths as foetuses born dead >=28 weeks of gestation. The WHO International Classification of Diseases-Perinatal Mortality was used to categorise the causes of foetal death. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: maternal characteristics, obstetric and foetal findings were investigated. Unadjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were computed with respect to the background population. Finally, causes of death and contributing maternal conditions have been considered. RESULTS: the maternity and neonatal units of the three participating Regions notified 520 stillbirths, of which 435 cases underwent to the multidisciplinary audit (83.7%); 40.0% of cases occurred in the gestational age range between 36 and 39 weeks. The risk of stillbirth was significantly increased in mothers with foreign citizenship (RR: 1.39; 95%CI: 1.13-1.71), multiple pregnancies (RR: 1.59; 95%CI 1.05-2.42), and pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies (RR: 2.15; 95%CI 1.45-3.19). The rate of congenital malformations was 6.0%. A diagnosis of foetal growth restriction was reported in 10.3% of cases, although the percentage of dead foetuses weighting <10° centile was at least twice in almost all gestational age periods. Post-mortem and placental histological examinations were carried out in more than 70% and more than 90% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: the implementation of a population-based surveillance system with high participation rate of maternity units and the use of universally accepted definitions could improve the identification of stillbirth avoidable risk factors and potentially modifiable predisposing maternal conditions, highlighting issues of perinatal assistance in need of improvement.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Perinatal , Mortinato , Humanos , Femenino , Italia/epidemiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Transversales , Mortinato/epidemiología , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Vigilancia de la Población , Edad Gestacional , Causas de Muerte , Muerte Fetal
15.
Wiad Lek ; 77(4): 716-723, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865628

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To predict trends in fertility, neonatal and perinatal mortality, and stillbirth rates to ascertain future perinatal care requirements during the post-war reconstruction in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The study uses the data from the Centre for Medical Statistics of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, covering the years 2012 to 2022. The data analysis was by a univariate linear regression model. The quality of these models was evaluated using the coefficient of determination, R2. RESULTS: Results: In 2022, the birth rate in Ukraine had declined to 2.5 times lower than that of 2011. The period was characterized by a notable increase in the incidence of premature births and in neonates with birth weights under 1000 grams and between 1000 to 2499 grams. While the neonatal mortality rate decreased by 3.7 times, there remains a statistically significant (p<0.05) increase in the mortality rates of premature infants and neonates weighing less than 1000 grams. The stillbirth rate in Ukraine remains constant; however, it exceeds that of the European Union. Predictions indicate a rise in antenatal mortality and a reduction in both intranatal and perinatal mortality. As of 2022, the perinatal mortality rate in Ukraine made up 7.72 per 1000 live births, which is significantly higher than the rate in the European Union. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The optimization of the network of healthcare facilities and resources should be prioritized, in response to the reliable decline in the birth rate. This necessitates improvements in the medical care for premature and low birth weight infants, and efforts for preventing stillbirths.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Infantil , Atención Perinatal , Mortalidad Perinatal , Mortinato , Humanos , Ucrania/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Mortinato/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Perinatal/tendencias , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Lactante , Fertilidad , Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología
16.
N Engl J Med ; 383(1): 49-57, 2020 07 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609981

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational age is the major determinant of neonatal death (death within the first 28 days of life) in preterm infants. The joint effect of gestational age and Apgar score on the risk of neonatal death is unknown. METHODS: Using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, we identified 113,300 preterm infants (22 weeks 0 days to 36 weeks 6 days of gestation) born from 1992 through 2016. In analyses stratified according to gestational age (22 to 24 weeks, 25 to 27 weeks, 28 to 31 weeks, 32 to 34 weeks, and 35 or 36 weeks), we estimated adjusted relative risks of neonatal death and absolute rate differences in neonatal mortality (i.e., the excess number of neonatal deaths per 100 births) according to the Apgar scores at 5 and 10 minutes and according to the change in the Apgar score between 5 minutes and 10 minutes. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating a better physical condition of the newborn. RESULTS: There were 1986 neonatal deaths (1.8%). The incidence of neonatal death ranged from 0.2% (at 36 weeks of gestation) to 76.5% (at 22 weeks of gestation). Lower Apgar scores were associated with higher relative risks of neonatal death and greater absolute rate differences in neonatal mortality in all gestational-age strata. For example, among infants born at 28 to 31 weeks, the adjusted absolute rate differences according to the 5-minute Apgar score, with those who had a score of 9 or 10 serving as the reference group, were 51.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.1 to 65.4) for a score of 0 or 1, 25.5 (95% CI, 18.3 to 32.8) for a score of 2 or 3, 7.1 (95% CI, 5.1 to 9.1) for a score of 4 to 6, and 1.2 (95% CI, 0.5 to 1.9) for a score of 7 or 8. An increase in the Apgar score between 5 minutes and 10 minutes was associated with lower neonatal mortality than a stable Apgar score. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Apgar scores at 5 and 10 minutes provided prognostic information about neonatal survival among preterm infants across gestational-age strata. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare and Karolinska Institutet.).


Asunto(s)
Puntaje de Apgar , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Muerte Perinatal , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Incidencia , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Mortalidad Perinatal , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Suecia/epidemiología
17.
BJOG ; 130(10): 1167-1176, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36999234

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP) affects the antenatal detection of large for gestational age (LGA) or maternal and perinatal outcomes amongst LGA babies. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a pragmatic open randomised cluster control trial comparing the GAP with standard care. SETTING: Eleven UK maternity units. POPULATION: Pregnant women and their LGA babies born at ≥36+0  weeks of gestation. METHODS: Clusters were randomly allocated to GAP implementation or standard care. Data were collected from electronic patient records. Trial arms were compared using summary statistics, with unadjusted and adjusted (two-stage cluster summary approach) differences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of detection of LGA (estimated fetal weight on ultrasound scan above the 90th centile after 34+0  weeks of gestation, defined by either population or customised growth charts), maternal and perinatal outcomes (e.g. mode of birth, postpartum haemorrhage, severe perineal tears, birthweight and gestational age, neonatal unit admission, perinatal mortality, and neonatal morbidity and mortality). RESULTS: A total of 506 LGA babies were exposed to GAP and 618 babies received standard care. There were no significant differences in the rate of LGA detection (GAP 38.0% vs standard care 48.0%; adjusted effect size -4.9%; 95% CI -20.5, 10.7; p = 0.54), nor in any of the maternal or perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GAP did not change the rate of antenatal ultrasound detection of LGA when compared with standard care.


Asunto(s)
Parto , Mortalidad Perinatal , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Edad Gestacional , Peso al Nacer , Feto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
18.
BJOG ; 130(7): 759-769, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether MAMAACT, an antenatal care (ANC) intervention, aimed at reducing ethnic and social disparities in perinatal mortality, affected perinatal health outcomes. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Nineteen of 20 maternity wards in Denmark. POPULATION: All newborn children within a pre-implementation period (2014-2017) or an implementation period (2018-2019) (n = 188 658). INTERVENTION: A 6-h training session for midwives in intercultural communication and cultural competence, two follow-up dialogue meetings, and health education materials for pregnant women on warning signs of pregnancy complications in six languages. METHODS: Nationwide register-based analysis of the MAMAACT cluster randomised controlled trial. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to estimate the change in outcomes from pre- to post-implementation in the intervention group relative to the control group. Results were obtained for the overall study population and for children born to immigrants from low- to middle-income countries, separately. Models were adjusted for confounders selected a priori. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A composite perinatal mortality and morbidity outcome, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths, Apgar score <7, umbilical arterial pH < 7.0, admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) >48 h, and NICU admissions for mechanical ventilation. Additional outcomes were the individual measures. RESULTS: The intervention increased the risk of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.34), mainly driven by differences in NICU admission risk (composite outcome excluding NICU, aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84-1.14). The intervention slightly increased the risk of low Apgar score and decreased the risk of low arterial pH, reflecting, however, small differences in absolute numbers. Other outcomes were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the MAMAACT intervention did not improve the composite perinatal mortality and morbidity outcome (when excluding NICU admissions). The lack of effects may be due to contextual factors including organisational barriers in ANC hindering the midwives from changing practices.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Perinatal , Atención Prenatal , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Parto , Mortinato/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Dinamarca/epidemiología
19.
BJOG ; 130(5): 524-530, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36562190

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative burdens of maternal and perinatal complications for preterm and term pre-eclampsia. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two English maternity units. POPULATION: Unselected women with singleton pregnancies who developed pre-eclampsia (International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy definition). METHODS: Outcomes were ascertained by health record review and compared between pregnancies with preterm (versus term) pre-eclampsia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe maternal hypertension, maternal mortality or major maternal morbidity, perinatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity, neonatal unit (NNU) admission ≥48 hours, and birthweight <3rd percentile. RESULTS: Among 40 241 singleton pregnancies, 298 (0.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.83) and 1194 (3.0%, 95% CI 2.8-3.1) developed preterm and term pre-eclampsia, respectively. Women with preterm (versus term) pre-eclampsia more commonly experienced adverse maternal or perinatal events: severe hypertension 18.5% (95% CI 14.5-23.3) versus 13.6% (95% CI 11.7-15.6); maternal mortality/major morbidity 7.4% (95% CI 4.9-10.9) versus 2.2% (95% CI 1.5-3.2); perinatal mortality/major neonatal morbidity 29.5% (95% CI 24.6-34.9) versus 2.2% (95% CI 1.5-3.2); and birthweight <3rd percentile 54.4% (95% CI 48.7-59.9) versus 14.2% (95% CI 12.4-16.3). However, in absolute terms, most maternal complications occurred in women with term pre-eclampsia, as did a large proportion of perinatal complications: severe hypertension 74.7% (95% CI 68.5-80.0); maternal mortality/major morbidity 54.2% (95% CI 40.3-67.4); perinatal mortality/major neonatal morbidity 22.8% (95% CI 16.1-31.3); NNU admission ≥48 hours 38.1% (95% CI 32.4-44.1); and birthweight <3rd percentile 51.2% (95% CI 45.8-56.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although adverse event risks are greater with preterm (versus term) pre-eclampsia, term disease is associated with at least equivalent total numbers of maternal, and a significant proportion of perinatal, adverse events. Increased efforts should be made to decrease the incidence of term pre-eclampsia.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Muerte Perinatal , Preeclampsia , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Peso al Nacer , Estudios Prospectivos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología
20.
BJOG ; 130(13): 1620-1628, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37280664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence, diagnostic management strategies and clinical outcomes of women with spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) and reassess the definition of SHiP. DESIGN: A population-based cohort study using the Netherlands Obstetric Surveillance System (NethOSS). SETTING: Nationwide, the Netherlands. POPULATION: All pregnant women between April 2016 and April 2018. METHODS: This is a case study of SHiP using the monthly registry reports of NethOSS. Complete anonymised case files were obtained. A newly introduced online Delphi audit system (DAS) was used to evaluate each case, to make recommendations on improving the management of SHiP and to propose a new definition of SHiP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and outcomes, lessons learned about clinical management and the critical appraisal of the current definition of SHiP. RESULTS: In total, 24 cases were reported. After a Delphi procedure, 14 cases were classified as SHiP. The nationwide incidence was 4.9 per 100 000 births. Endometriosis and conceiving after artificial reproductive techniques were identified as risk factors. No maternal and three perinatal deaths occurred. Based on the DAS, adequate imaging of free intra-abdominal fluid, and identifying and treating women with signs of hypovolemic shock could improve the early detection and management of SHiP. A revised definition of SHiP was proposed, excluding the need for surgical or radiological intervention. CONCLUSIONS: SHiP is a rare and easily misdiagnosed condition that is associated with high perinatal mortality. To improve care, better awareness among healthcare workers is needed. The DAS is a sufficient tool to audit maternal morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Hemoperitoneo , Muerte Perinatal , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios de Cohortes , Hemoperitoneo/diagnóstico , Hemoperitoneo/epidemiología , Hemoperitoneo/etiología , Parto , Mortalidad Perinatal , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Recién Nacido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA