Geographical Variation in Traumatic Brain Injury Mortality by Proximity to the Nearest Neurosurgeon.

BACKGROUND: Trauma mortality disproportionately affects populations farther from potentially lifesaving trauma care, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) is no exception. Previous examinations have examined proximity to trauma centers as an explanation for trauma mortality, but little is known about the relationship between proximity to neurosurgeons specifically in TBI mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, county-level TBI mortality rates from 2008 to 2014 were examined in relation to the distance to the nearest neurosurgeon and trauma facility. The locations of practicing neurosurgeons and trauma facilities in the United States were determined by geocoding data from the 2017 Medicare Physician and Other Supplier and Provider of Services files (respectively). The association between TBI mortality and the distance from the population-weighted centroid of the county to a closest neurosurgeon and trauma facility was examined using multivariate negative binomial regression. RESULTS: A total of 761 of the 3108 counties (24.5%) in the continental United States were excluded from the analysis because they had 20 or fewer TBI deaths during this time, producing unstable estimates. Excluded counties accounted for 1.67% of the US population. Multivariate analysis revealed a county's mortality increased 10% for every 25 miles from the nearest neurosurgeon (adjusted incident rate ratio: 1.10 [95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.12]; P < 0.001). The distance to the nearest trauma facility was not found to be significantly associated with mortality (adjusted incident rate ratio: 1.01 [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.03]; P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that proximity to neurosurgeons may influence county-level TBI mortality. Further research into this topic with more granular data may help to allocate scarce public health resources.

Microsurgical and endovascular treatment of un-ruptured cerebral aneurysms by European hybrid neurosurgeons to balance surgical skills and medical staff management.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, aneurysm treatment performed by dually trained neurosurgeons is extremely scarce. We provide outcome data for un-ruptured aneurysm patients treated at a European hybrid center to prove that hybrid neurosurgeons achieve clinical and angiographical results allowing to integrate hybrid neurosurgery into routine aneurysm treatment. This will not only help to maintain neurovascular microsurgical skills but will influence staff costs in related hospitals. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutively treated un-ruptured aneurysm patients between 2000 and 2016. The decision-making took into account the pros and cons of both modalities and considered patient and aneurysm characteristics. Clinical outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Occlusion rates were stratified into grade I for 100%, grade II for 99-90%, and grade III for <90% occlusion. To account for the introduction of stents, two treatment periods (p1, 2000 to 2008; p2, 2009 to 2016) were defined. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 274 patients (median age 55 years) harboring 338 un-ruptured aneurysms. Microsurgery (MS) was performed in 51.8% and endovascular therapy (EVT) in 43.1%; 5.1% required combined treatment. Overall, 93% showed a favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2), 94.3% after MS and 91.5% after EVT. Grade I aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 82.6% patients, 91.9% after MS and 72.9% after EVT. Procedure-related complications occurred after MS in 5.6% and after EVT in 4.4% patients. Mortality was recorded for five (1.8%) patients, one patient after MS and four after EVT. For the EVT cohort, significant improvement from p1 to p2 was seen with clinical outcomes (P=0.030, RR = 0.905, CI: 0.8351-0.9802) and occlusion rates (P=0.039, RR = 0.6790, CI: 0.499-0.923). CONCLUSION: Hybrid neurosurgeons achieve qualified clinical and angiographic results. Dual training will allow to maintain neurovascular caseloads and preserve future aneurysm treatment within neurosurgery. Furthermore economic benefits could be observed in hospital management.

Postural ergonomics and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery: lessons from an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) affect a significant percentage of the neurosurgical workforce. The aim of the current questionnaire-based study was to examine the prevalence of WMSDs amongst neurosurgeons, identify risk factors, and study the views of neurosurgeons regarding ergonomics. METHODS: From June to August 2020, members of the "European Association of Neurosurgical Societies," the "Neurosurgery Research Listserv," and the "Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies" were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire on the topics of WMSDs and ergonomics. RESULTS: A total of 409 neurosurgeons responded to the survey, with a 4.7 male to female ratio. Most of the surgeons worked in Europe (76.9%) in academic public hospitals. The vast majority of the participants (87.9%) had experienced WMSDs, mainly affecting the shoulder, neck, and back muscles. The most common operations performed by the participants were "Craniotomy for convexity/intrinsic tumors" (24.1%) and "Open lumbar basic spine" (24.1%). Neurosurgeons agreed that ergonomics is an underexposed area in the neurosurgical field (84.8%) and that more resources should be spend (87.3%) and training curricula changes should be made (78.3%) in order to alleviate the burden of WMSDs on neurosurgeons. Univariate analysis did not reveal any associations between the development of WMSDs and age, gender, tenure, average duration of operation, operating time per week, type of operation, and surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: The problem of WMSDs ought to be more closely addressed and managed by the neurosurgical community. More studies ought to be designed to investigate specific ergonomic parameters in order to formulate practice recommendations.

The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective.

Surgical experience is of paramount importance to reach therapeutic success and minimize operative complications. In the field of pituitary surgery, this led to the concept of Pituitary Center of Excellence (PTCOE) defined as a center where an interdisciplinary team works in collaboration and where surgeons can be trained appropriately to reach and keep excellence in daily practice. To review the literature to define the optimal referral population size to establish a PTCOE to optimize both training and specific field research. A review of the literature was performed about epidemiology. The time needed to observe 200 cases of PAs in a single PTCOE and to reach the minimal surgical experience threshold (MSET) was calculated for different referral population groups. The time needed to reach MSET decreased as population size increased. We defined a population as the optimal one to be served by a single PTCOE with a single dedicated neurosurgeon. PTCOEs should be established after an analysis of the referral population, number of cases suitable for surgical treatment and number of dedicated neurosurgeons.

Trends in endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a survey of the international society of pituitary surgeons between 2010 and 2020.

PURPOSE: This comparative survey of surgical practice patterns between 2010 and 2020 aims to elicit trends in practice patterns for transsphenoidal surgery and to identify areas for improvement. METHODS: Web-based surveys were sent to the International Society of Pituitary Surgeons via a membership listserv in 2010 and 2020. These 33-item surveys collected information on demographics, surgical approach, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and recommendations for improvements. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: There were 51 respondents in 2010 and 82 respondents in 2020. The majority were full-time academic surgeons from the United States or Europe. Preference for a purely endoscopic technique increased from 43% in 2010 to 87% in 2020. Preference for routinely working with an otolaryngologist or second neurosurgeon increased from 35 to 51%. Most surgeons (74%) reported that they were more likely to achieve a greater extent of resection with the endoscope, though 51% noted increased operating time. The most commonly rated advantage (34%) of endoscopic TSS was fewer postoperative nasoseptal perforations; the most commonly (34%) rated disadvantage was more postoperative complications, including cerebrospinal fluid leak. Respondents were divided on whether microscopic TSS should continue to be taught in residency. Many (32%) advocated for improved endoscopic instrumentation and team training. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic TSS is now the clearly preferred method for surgery amongst a cohort of higher-volume academic neurosurgeons. This trend is likely to continue, and this provides guidelines for future training.

Machine learning in neurosurgery: a global survey.

BACKGROUND: Recent technological advances have led to the development and implementation of machine learning (ML) in various disciplines, including neurosurgery. Our goal was to conduct a comprehensive survey of neurosurgeons to assess the acceptance of and attitudes toward ML in neurosurgical practice and to identify factors associated with its use. METHODS: The online survey consisted of nine or ten mandatory questions and was distributed in February and March 2019 through the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) and the Congress of Neurosurgeons (CNS). RESULTS: Out of 7280 neurosurgeons who received the survey, we received 362 responses, with a response rate of 5%, mainly in Europe and North America. In total, 103 neurosurgeons (28.5%) reported using ML in their clinical practice, and 31.1% in research. Adoption rates of ML were relatively evenly distributed, with 25.6% for North America, 30.9% for Europe, 33.3% for Latin America and the Middle East, 44.4% for Asia and Pacific and 100% for Africa with only two responses. No predictors of clinical ML use were identified, although academic settings and subspecialties neuro-oncology, functional, trauma and epilepsy predicted use of ML in research. The most common applications were for predicting outcomes and complications, as well as interpretation of imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides a global overview of the neurosurgical applications of ML. A relevant proportion of the surveyed neurosurgeons reported clinical experience with ML algorithms. Future studies should aim to clarify the role and potential benefits of ML in neurosurgery and to reconcile these potential advantages with bioethical considerations.

Women in German Neurosurgery: Status and Representation at Annual National Meetings.

BACKGROUND: Few women have ascended the professional-academic ladder to become chairs of German neurosurgical departments. Indeed, only 2 out of 36 current departmental heads are female. This study aims to assess the current representation and role of women in German neurosurgery and to identify indicators of how these aspects will progress. METHODS: National statistics concerning the gender distribution of neurosurgery specialists over the past 20 y and the gender distribution across DGNC (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie - German Society of Neurosurgery) membership grades from 2016 to 2018 were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office and the DGNC, respectively. Additionally, the programmes of DGNC annual meetings from 2015 to 2018 were evaluated to determine the number of presentations and speaking time awarded to male and female presenters. RESULTS: In 2017, 19% of neurosurgical specialists were female. In the same year, overall 13% of the members of the DGNC were female. There were a higher proportion of females among extraordinary members. In the last 4 y, females were overall responsible for less than a third of presentations at the annual DGNC meetings. There was also a decrease of female participation from 2015 to 2018, with regard to both overall amount of presentations and speaking time. Female participation was overall higher for presentation types typically associated with lower academic and clinical positions and which cover shorter speaking times. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, which has one of Europe's largest neurosurgical communities, female neurosurgeons remain a minority. Structured programmes to support gender equality and diversity could facilitate the rise of women to senior positions and close the gender gap.

Enhanced recovery after spine surgery-a multinational survey assessing surgeons' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is the object of numerous publications in various surgical fields. Still, its value in spine surgery is not as recognized as it is in other surgical domains. Our aim was to report neurosurgeons' opinions about ERAS in spine surgery. METHODS: From December 2019 to January 2020, members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding ERAS in spine surgery. RESULTS: N = 234 participants responded to the survey (60% spine neurosurgeons; 22.6% working in private practice). Thirty-two percent reported to have more than 20 years of experience, followed by surgeons having between 5 and 10 (27.4%), 10-15 (17.9%), 15-20 (12%), and 0-5 years (10.7%). Gender distribution (12% vs 27% female gender, p = 0.04), private practice activity (28% vs 14%, p = 0.01), familiarity with the ERAS concept (57.4% vs 27%, p < 0.0001), and its implementation in the daily clinical practice (47.5% vs 18.3%, p < 0.0001) were statistically different between spine and general neurosurgeons. 54.7% of the surgeons were unfamiliar with ERAS in spine surgery. 63.7% considered ERAS as a progress; 36% declared to implement ERAS in their daily clinical practice. 1.7% reported ERAS as a decrease in the quality of management. 6.8% considered ERAS as not having an impact on patient care; 27.8% had no opinion. There were no differences in opinion on ERAS and its implementation between surgeons working in private and public hospitals. 69.5% of the spine surgeons considered ERAS having a positive impact on patient management, versus 55% of non-spine surgeons (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts are necessary to promote minimal invasive pre-, intra-, and postoperative workflow to improve patient management and reduce complications or side effects particularly adapted to spinal surgery. Specificities of spine patients, in terms of chronic pain, pre- and postoperative pain management, and psychological issues have to be considered.

Spine surgery is kyphosing to spine surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Spine surgery is a demanding surgical specialty which requires surgeons to operate for hours on end, often compromising good posture. Sustained poor posture in the operating room (OR) can be the source of many adverse health effects on spine surgeons. This study will analyze posture of a spine surgeon in different types of spine surgery cases. METHODS: Posture of a surgeon was measured using the UPRIGHT Posture Training Device. The device was worn by the surgeon in the OR through a wide variety of spine surgery cases. RESULTS: The percent time spent slouched while performing cervical, adult deformity, and lumbar spine surgeries is 39.9, 58.9, and 38.6, respectively. For all surgeries recorded, the percent time slouched is 41.6. The average procedure time was 145.3 min, with adult deformity cases on average being the longest (245.6 min) followed by cervical (152.9 min) and then lumbar (122.5 min). CONCLUSION: Poor posture while operating is very likely to occur for many spine surgeons regardless of case type. This poor posture is maintained for long periods of time given the average spine surgery procedure recorded in the study was roughly 2.5 h long. Spine surgeons should be aware of the tendency for poor posture while operating, and they should try using posture-improving techniques to maintain good spine health.

Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a growing and probably undervalued concern for neurosurgeons and spine surgeons, as they can impact their quality of life and career length. This systematic review aims to ascertain this association and to search for preventive measures. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA-P-based review on ergonomics and WMSDs in neurosurgery over the last 15 years. Twelve original articles were included, of which 6 focused on spine surgery ergonomics, 5 cranio-facial surgery (mainly endoscopic), and one on both domains. RESULTS: We found a huge methodological and content diversity among studies with 5 surveys, 3 cross-sectional studies, 2 retrospective cohorts, and 2 technical notes. Spine surgeons have sustained neck flexion and neglect their posture during surgery. In a survey, low back pain was found in 62% of surgeons, 31% of them with a diagnosed lumbar disc herniation, and 23% of surgery rate. Pain in the neck (59%), shoulder (49%), finger (31%), and wrist (25%) are more frequent than in the general population. Carpal tunnel syndrome showed a linear relationship with increasing cumulative hours of spine surgery practice. Among cranial procedures, endoscopy was also significantly related to shoulder pain while pineal region surgery received some attempts to optimize ergonomics. CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomics in neurosurgery remains underreported and lack attention from surgeons and authorities. Improvements shall target postural ergonomics, equipment design, weekly schedule adaptation, and exercise.

Workforce planning in neurosurgery.

Purpose: Since the introduction of run-through training in UK Neurosurgery in 2007, there has been no limit on the number of posts deaneries may apply for. The rationale for run-through training was based on the premise that the number of trainees recruited would match the number of consultant posts eight years later. There has been no formal survey of the number of consultant neurosurgeons in the UK for several years. A survey was undertaken to measure the current Neurosurgical workforce.Methods: The Specialist Advisory Committee undertook a survey to establish the current workforce and estimate how best to ensure that the correct number of trainees are being recruited. Data was also obtained from public bodies including the GMC, NHS Jobs and JCST.Results: Since 1993 the number of Neurosurgeons in UK and Ireland has increased from 132.5 to 389 whole time equivalents (4.4% curvilinear annual increase). The number of registered neurosurgical trainees fell 9% from 278 in 2012 to 248 in 2017. The number of UK graduates in Neurosurgical training has remained constant. The number of trainees failing to complete training has increased from 1.25 per annum in 2009-2012 to 5-6 in 2014-2017. The number of ST1 level trainees recruited has risen, which a fall in the number of trainees entering at the ST3 level has partially offset. The number of doctors with a CCT in Neurosurgery but no substantive consultant post has risen from 26 to 43 between 2015 and 2018.Conclusions: Neurosurgical workforce data should be collected regularly and a workforce planning process should be implemented. Consultant expansion is required to reduce the number of CCT holders without consultant jobs. The specialty should prevent any further increase in the number of trainees recruited and we should consider a marginal reduction in recruitment.

Initial biopsy and early re-resection practices in the treatment of glioblastoma among AANS/CNS tumor section surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management strategies for glioblastoma (GBM) may differ among neurosurgeons with initial biopsy of suspected tumors and the need for early re-resection of tumors within 30 days of initial surgery. This study was initiated by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Tumor Section's interest in understanding the rates at which pre- and post-resection procedures, specifically biopsies prior to definitive resection and early re-resections, are performed by U.S. neurosurgeons in the management of GBM. METHODS: A ten-question survey was distributed to members of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section. RESULTS: The survey response rate among AANS/CNS Tumor Section surgeons was approximately 16%. Results showed that a majority of respondents performed surgery on 11-25 GBM cases annually. Of those cases, most neurosurgeons claimed that biopsies are rarely performed prior to tumor resection, but in the < 10% of cases for which biopsies are done, common reasons are to confirm radiological findings or improve the treatment plan. Likewise, re-resections are rare, but in the < 5 cases most neurosurgeons performed annually, common reasons included incomplete initial resections, referrals for greater resection, or unspecified reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to confirm the results of this study, which shows low rates of stereotactic and open biopsy and early re-resection procedures performed among neurosurgeons. These rates may help form guidelines in the treatment of GBM and encourage the use of surgical adjuncts that increase the extent of resection of these tumors, thereby reducing rates of early recurrence.

Academic output of German neurosurgical residents in 35 academic neurosurgery residency programs.

BACKGROUND: The scientific activity of neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents as measured by bibliometric parameters is of increased interest. While data about academic output for neurosurgeons in the USA, the UK, and Canada have been published, no similar results for German neurosurgical residents exist. Within this study, we aim to evaluate the academic output of German neurosurgery residents in 35 academic residency programs. METHODS: Data for each resident were collected from the departmental websites, Pubmed, and Scopus. Further analyses evaluated the relationship between publication productivity, sex, and academic degree (Dr. med.). RESULTS: Data from 424 neurosurgery residents were analyzed. A total of 1222 publications were considered. A total of 355 (29%) of the 1222 publications were first-author publications. The average number of publications per resident was 2.9; the average h-index and m-quotient was 1.1 and 0.4, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in academic output and h-index among neurosurgical residents with a doctoral degree compared with residents without such degree (5.3 vs. 1.3, p < 0.0001 and 2.0 vs. 0.5, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This is the very first study evaluating the academic output of neurosurgical residents in academic neurosurgical departments in Germany.

Specialty Classifications of Physicians Who Provide Neurocritical Care in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize the specialty classification of US physicians who provide critical care for neurological/neurosurgical disease. METHODS: Using inpatient claims between 2009 and 2015 from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we selected hospitalizations for neurological/neurosurgical diseases with potential to result in life-threatening manifestations requiring critical care. Using Current Procedural Terminology® codes, we determined the medical specialty of providers submitting critical care claims, and, using National Provider Identifier numbers, we merged in data from the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) to determine whether the provider was a UCNS diplomate in neurocritical care. We defined providers with a clinical neuroscience background as neurologists, neurosurgeons, and/or UCNS diplomates in neurocritical care. We defined neurocritical care service as a critical care claim with a qualifying neurological/neurosurgical diagnosis in patients with a relevant primary hospital discharge diagnosis and ≥ 3 total critical care claims, excluding claims from the first day of hospitalization since these were mostly emergency-department claims. Our findings were reported using descriptive statistics with exact confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 1,952,305 Medicare beneficiaries, we identified 99,937 hospitalizations with at least one claim for neurocritical care. In our primary analysis, neurologists accounted for 28.0% (95% CI, 27.5-28.5%) of claims, neurosurgeons for 3.7% (95% CI, 3.5-3.9%), UCNS-certified neurointensivists for 25.8% (95% CI, 25.3-26.3%), and providers with any clinical neuroscience background for 42.8% (95% CI, 42.2-43.3%). The likelihood of management by physicians with a clinical neuroscience background increased proportionally with patients' county-level socioeconomic status and such providers were 3 times more likely to be based at an academic medical center than other physicians who billed for critical care in our sample (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians with a dedicated clinical neuroscience background accounted for less than half of neurocritical care service in US Medicare beneficiaries.

A survey of doctors on diagnosis and treatment of dementia with Lewy bodies: examination and treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a progressive form of dementia, accompanied by a range of behavioural and psychological symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify current clinical practice for the treatment of DLB in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a survey of medical doctors engaged in the management of dementia in Japan. Participants were divided into two groups: psychiatrists (Group P) and neurologists or neurosurgeons (Group NS). Doctors completed a questionnaire and we analysed their responses to compare the two groups with regard to diagnosis and treatment of DLB, and in particular the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). RESULTS: Responses suggested that Group P conducted biomarker examinations less frequently and decided on their own therapeutic strategies more frequently than did Group NS. Both groups most frequently selected hallucinations/delusions as the symptoms given highest treatment priority. More than 70% of respondents in both groups reported having difficulties in treating BPSD. Atypical antipsychotics were more frequently prescribed by Group P, but were also prescribed in 70% of patients in Group NS. A third of patients received atypical antipsychotics for more than 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The responses to this survey highlighted the difficulties faced by clinicians managing patients with DLB and identified the need to effectively treat BPSD in such patients.

The impact of the reserve military neurosurgeon: practice, community, and service.

OBJECTIVEPapers from 2002 to 2017 have highlighted consistent unique socioeconomic challenges and opportunities facing military neurosurgeons. Here, the authors focus on the reserve military neurosurgeon who carries the dual mission of both civilian and military responsibilities.METHODSSurvey solicitation of current active duty and reserve military neurosurgeons was performed in conjunction with the AANS/CNS Joint Committee of Military Neurosurgeons and the Council of State Neurosurgical Societies. Demographic, qualitative, and quantitative data points were compared between reserve and active duty military neurosurgeons. Civilian neurosurgical provider data were taken from the 2016 NERVES (Neurosurgery Executives Resource Value and Education Society) Socio-Economic Survey. Economic modeling was done to forecast the impact of deployment or mobilization on the reserve neurosurgeon, neurosurgery practice, and the community.RESULTSSeventy-five percent (12/16) of current reserve neurosurgeons reported that they are satisfied with their military service. Reserve neurosurgeons make significant contributions to the military's neurosurgical capabilities, with 75% (12/16) having been deployed during their career. No statistically significant demographic differences were found between those serving on active duty and those in the reserve service. However, those who served in the reserves were more likely to desire opportunities for improvement in the military workflow requirements compared with their active duty counterparts (p = 0.04); 92.9% (13/14) of current reserve neurosurgeons desired more flexible military drill programs specific to the needs of practicing physicians. The risk of reserve deployment is also borne by the practices, hospitals, and communities in which the neurosurgeon serves in civilian practice. This can result in fewer new patient encounters, decreased collections, decreased work relative value unit generation, increased operating costs per neurosurgeon, and intangible limitations on practice development. However, through modeling, the authors have illustrated that reserve physicians joining a larger group practice can significantly mitigate this risk. What remains astonishing is that 91.7% of those reserve neurosurgeons who were deployed noted the experience to be rewarding despite seeing a 20% reduction in income, on average, during the fiscal year of a 6-month deployment.CONCLUSIONSReserve neurosurgeons are satisfied with their military service while making substantial contributions to the military's neurosurgical capabilities, with the overwhelming majority of current military reservists having been deployed or mobilized during their reserve commitments. Through the authors' modeling, the impact of deployment on the military neurosurgeon, neurosurgeon's practice, and the local community can be significantly mitigated by a larger practice environment.

Accuracy and Safety of External Ventricular Drain Placement by Physician Assistants and Nurse Practitioners in Aneurysmal Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: In the current dynamic health environment, increasing number of procedures are being completed by advanced practitioners (nurse practitioners and physician assistants). This is the first study to assess the clinical outcomes and safety of external ventricular drain (EVD) placements by specially trained advanced practitioners. OBJECTIVE: Compare the safety and outcomes of EVD placement by advanced practitioners in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: A cohort comparison study was performed from an aneurysmal SAH database selecting patients treated with EVD from a single major academic institution in the USA between June 2007 and June 2017. Safety, accuracy, and complications of EVD placement were compared between advanced practitioners and neurosurgical physicians (attending neurosurgeon and subspecialty clinical fellow). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables, with p values set at < 0.05 for significance. RESULTS: We identified 203 patients for this cohort with 238 EVD placements; eighty-seven (36.6%) placements were performed by advanced practitioners and 151 (63.4%) by neurosurgeons. Most of the ventriculostomies were placed in the emergency room (n = 114; 47.9%). Additional procedures performed concurrently with the EVD placements were significantly higher among the physicians' group (21.8 vs. 4.6%; p < 0.001). Bedside placement and usage of Ghajar guide were significantly higher among advanced practitioner's (58.3 vs. 98.9 and 9.9 vs. 64.4%, respectively, with a p < 0.001 for both). There were, however, no significant differences in terms of the number of attempts for insertion, intraprocedural complications, tract hemorrhages, accuracy, infection rates, catheter dislodgments, and need for repositioning/replacement of EVD. CONCLUSION: After appropriate training, EVD placement can be safely performed by advanced practitioners with an adequate accuracy of placement.

Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a survey among Norwegian spine surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common reason for lumbar surgery in the elderly. There is growing evidence that decompressive surgery offers an advantage over non-surgical management for selected patients with persistent severe symptoms. Based on treatment traditions, open laminectomy has been the gold standard surgical treatment, but various other surgical and non-surgical treatments for LSS are widely used in clinical practice. Therefore, we conducted a survey study to capture potential diversities in surgeons' management of LSS in Norway. METHODS: All spine surgeons in Norway were contacted by e-mail and asked to answer a 20-item questionnaire by using an Internet-based survey tool. We asked eight questions about the respondent (gender, surgical specialty, workplace, experience, number of surgeries performed per year, use of magnification devices) and 12 questions about different aspects of the surgical treatment of LSS (indication for surgery and preoperative imaging, different surgical techniques, clinical outcome). RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 51 spine surgeons (47% response rate). The preferred surgical technique for LSS in Norway is microdecompression via a unilateral approach and crossover technique, followed by microdecompression via a bilateral approach. Other techniques are not much used in Norway. CONCLUSIONS: Most Norwegian spine surgeons use minimally invasive decompression techniques in the surgical treatment of LSS, and unilateral microsurgical decompression with crossover decompression is the preferred technique. Where evidence is lacking (e.g., fusion procedures), there is a larger variation of opinions and preferred procedures among Norwegian spine surgeons.

Neonatal post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus in the UK: a survey of current practice.

OBJECTIVES: The management of neonatal post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus (nPHH) varies considerably between centres and even between neurosurgeons in the same centre. We performed a nationwide survey to evaluate current practice in the UK and reviewed the evidence for each intervention. METHODS: An online semi-structured questionnaire was emailed to all units registered on the British Paediatric Neurosurgery Group Mailing List. The survey consisted of 18 questions designed to establish the status quo in the management of nPHH, including preferred temporising procedure, factors guiding the timing of intervention and willingness to participate in a prospective study. RESULTS: A total of 24 consultants responded to the survey. Ventricular access device (VAD), trans-fontanelle tap, ventriculosubgaleal shunt (VSGS) and lumbar puncture (LP) were used by 33, 25, 17 and 17%, respectively, as the first temporising measure. Almost all reported that the timing of this intervention was guided by increasing head circumference and tense fontanelle. If the first temporising procedure fails, VAD, external ventricular drainage (EVD), trans-fontanelle tap, VSGS and other procedures (including ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV)) were performed by 42, 17, 13, 8 and 21%, respectively. Almost all respondents reported that VP shunting would be their preferred method of definitive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. Almost all responded that they would be willing to participate in a prospective study in the future to determine best practice. CONCLUSION: As expected there was a significant heterogeneity between respondents in the initial management of nPHH in the UK. VAD was the most popular first and second choice temporising measure. On reviewing the literature, it is clear that more work still needs to be done to establish which temporising measure is best. There is willingness in the UK to participate in a study to help determine this.

A national survey of the management of patients with incidental meningioma in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Incidental meningiomas are increasingly being diagnosed due to widespread use of brain imaging. Treatment options include surveillance, surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, but the natural history of these tumours is not fully understood and there are no accepted management guidelines to aid clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to assess current practice in the United Kingdom and identify areas of variation for further study. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to all members of the Society of British Neurosurgeons (SBNS). The main components of the survey included the assessment of which factors and tumour characteristics are considered in the management and follow-up of incidental meningiomas. Two case scenarios were also presented. RESULTS: The response rate was 12.5% (44 completed surveys) with 74% (25/34) of neurosurgical centres represented. Absence of calcification was only considered by 36% (16/44) of neurosurgeons. Most neurosurgeons opt for surveillance at initial presentation, and the length of follow-up was 5 years (14/33) and 10 years (11/33). The case scenarios highlighted that tumour growth at follow-up resulted in a preference to change from surveillance to treatment with surgery or SRS. SRS was preferred in skull-base (23/36) and medial sphenoid wing (16/39) tumours. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has demonstrated that certain aspects of incidental meningioma management show variation and remain controversial. Further research through prospective cohort studies is required to provide evidence to support guidelines for the management of incidental meningiomas.