RESUMEN
Athlete support personnel (ASP) failing to meet responsibilities under the World Anti-Doping Code risk sanction. It is unclear whether the poor knowledge of responsibilities seen in sports physicians and coaches applies to other ASP (e.g., administrators, chiropractors, family, nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists, and trainers). A purposive sample of Australian ASP (n = 292) responded to a survey on knowledge of anti-doping rules (35 true/false questions), ethical beliefs and practice, and attitudes toward performance enhancement. Some ASP declined to participate, claiming doping was irrelevant to their practice. Physicians were most knowledgeable (30.8/35), with family and trainers the least (26.0/35). ASP reported that improvements were needed to support anti-doping education (e.g., basis for anti-doping) and practice (e.g., rules). ASP also had a slightly negative attitude toward performance enhancement. Linear regression showed that being a sports physician, providing support at the elite level, and 15 years of experience influenced knowledge. The results confirm gaps in knowledge, suggesting that stronger engagement with ASP anti-doping education and practice is needed. Applying the principles of andragogy could help foster active engagement through emphasis on active inquiry, rather than passive reception of content. Future work on the context within which ASP experience anti-doping is needed, exploring acquisition and translation of knowledge into practice.
Asunto(s)
Doping en los Deportes , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adulto , Australia , Quiropráctica/ética , Doping en los Deportes/ética , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutricionistas/ética , Nutricionistas/psicología , Sustancias para Mejorar el Rendimiento , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Médicos/ética , Médicos/psicología , Psicología/ética , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Personalization of nutrition advice is a process already familiar to registered dietitian nutritionists, but it is not yet clear whether incorporating genetic results as an added layer of precision improves nutrition-related outcomes. Therefore, an independent workgroup of experts, supported by the Academy's Evidence Analysis Center staff, conducted a systematic review to examine the level of evidence measuring the effect of incorporating genetic testing results into nutrition counseling and care, compared to an alternative intervention or control group, on nutrition-related outcomes. This systematic review revealed that only weak quality evidence is available in the scientific literature and observed that this field is still maturing. Therefore, at present, there is insufficient scientific evidence to determine whether there are effects of incorporating genetic testing into nutrition practice. The workgroup prepared this Consensus Report based on this systematic review to provide considerations for the practical application of incorporating genetic testing into the nutrition care process.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Dietética/métodos , Pruebas Genéticas , Nutrigenómica/métodos , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Nutrición/genética , Academias e Institutos , Confidencialidad , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Nutrigenómica/educación , Nutricionistas/ética , Medicina de Precisión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Logro , Dietética , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Objetivos , Nutricionistas , Sociedades Científicas , Canadá , Dietética/educación , Dietética/ética , Dietética/tendencias , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/educación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/ética , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Humanos , Liderazgo , Política Nutricional , Nutricionistas/educación , Nutricionistas/ética , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Professionalism of health care practitioners is central to safe and ethical health care, and forms part of the trust that the public places in health care practitioners. Lapses in professionalism in health care present considerable challenges and can have serious consequences and outcomes. Teaching, learning, and assessing professionalism is an important component of nutrition and dietetics education. There is scant peer-reviewed published research related to professionalism in nutrition and dietetics. Providing a definition of professionalism will support progress in curriculum planning and design, teaching, learning and assessment of students, and ongoing professional development of educators and practitioners. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conceptualize and define professionalism for the purpose of teaching nutrition and dietetics. DESIGN: This study included a critical systematic literature review of original research and a targeted and systematic search of national and international dietetics competency standards, exploring the concept and definitions of professionalism in nutrition and dietetics. Competency standards were chosen as an additional focus in the systematic literature search, as they are the key framework documents that guide curriculum development and education standards internationally. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize extracted data and an inductive, interpretivist approach was then applied in conceptualizing a definition of professionalism. RESULTS: Seven studies and six national and international sets of competency standards were included in the literature review. Four major themes conceptualizing a definition of professionalism for nutrition and dietetics were identified from the integration of the original research and targeted gray literature reviews: 1) personal attributes; 2) interpersonal communication; 3) approach to practice; and 4) commitment to lifelong learning. CONCLUSIONS: Defining professionalism for nutrition and dietetics supports progress toward shared understandings, building trust, and assisting in dietetics education and practice. It can be used to support and extend teaching, learning, and assessment of professionalism.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Dietética/educación , Nutricionistas/educación , Profesionalismo/educación , Curriculum , Dietética/ética , Humanos , Nutricionistas/éticaRESUMEN
Social media tools, including blogs, social networks, and media-sharing sites, help nutrition and dietetics practitioners reach broader audiences and connect directly with the public. In many ways, social media has transformed the practice of dietetics and has opened up new avenues for communicating food and nutrition information. Social media has been an effective tool for virtual nutrition counseling, patient education, peer-to-peer support, and public health campaigns. Increasingly, nutrition and dietetics practitioners are using social media to network and collaborate with colleagues, conduct a job search, stay current with new research, champion a cause, promote products or services, and build a business. The potential role of social media in the profession is far reaching, yet there are important guidelines to follow related to ethics and professionalism. When using social media, nutrition and dietetics practitioners must remember that they are governed by the same Code of Ethics that guides all other aspects of practice. In addition, it is critical to have a thorough understanding of all the factors related to social media professionalism, including disclosure rules from the Federal Trade Commission, patient/client privacy and confidentiality as covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, and copyright laws that protect intellectual property. In today's digital age, it is essential for nutrition and dietetics practitioners to recognize the professional opportunities and challenges of social media. Failing to effectively and ethically use social media can reflect poorly on the individual practitioner and the profession. Certain violations may have legal implications. The purpose of this Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics practice paper is to provide guidance on social media's relevance, potential applications, best practices, benefits, and risks.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/métodos , Nutricionistas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Telemedicina , Academias e Institutos , Dietética/ética , Dietética/organización & administración , Humanos , Nutricionistas/ética , Nutricionistas/organización & administración , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/métodosAsunto(s)
Curriculum , Dietética/educación , Ética Profesional , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Apoyo Nutricional , Dietética/ética , Dietética/normas , Dietética/tendencias , Ética Profesional/educación , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Apoyo Nutricional/ética , Apoyo Nutricional/normas , Apoyo Nutricional/tendencias , Nutricionistas/educación , Nutricionistas/ética , Nutricionistas/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rol Profesional , Sociedades Científicas , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosAsunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones/ética , Dietética/ética , Nutricionistas/ética , Sociedades Científicas , HumanosAsunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Dietética , Dietética/educación , Dietética/ética , Educación Continua , Retroalimentación Psicológica , Tecnología de Alimentos/educación , Tecnología de Alimentos/ética , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Ciencias de la Nutrición/educación , Ciencias de la Nutrición/ética , Nutricionistas/educación , Nutricionistas/ética , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Sociedades Científicas , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
No disponible