Incidence of serotonin syndrome in patients receiving tedizolid and concomitant serotonergic agents.

This study investigated the real-world incidence rate of serotonin syndrome in patients receiving tedizolid and concomitant serotonergic agents. A retrospective cohort of 479 adult patients was assessed between January 2015 and July 2023. Overall, a rare rate of 0.4% (2/479) of possible serotonin syndrome with tedizolid was identified. Given that concomitant serotonergic agents were commonly used, further study is warranted to determine causality.

Efficacy and side-effect profile of tedizolid in the treatment of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome due to clindamycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes: A case report.

Oxazolidinones, such as tedizolid and linezolid, are bacteriostatic antibiotics that inhibit protein synthesis. Based on the findings from animal studies and their mechanism of action, these antibiotics are considered for managing toxic shock caused by clindamycin-resistant Group A Streptococcus (GAS; Streptococcus pyogenes). However, clinical reports on their usage in such cases are limited. Herein, we report a case of a 67-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia who presented with fever, facial swelling, and myalgia. She was diagnosed with cellulitis and empirically treated with meropenem. Blood culture later revealed GAS, and she was diagnosed with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The antibiotic regimen was adjusted based on sensitivity results, with clindamycin initially replaced by linezolid and later switched to tedizolid owing to concerns about potential bone marrow suppression. Her condition improved, and she was discharged 15 days after admission. Therefore, tedizolid may be a safer option for managing toxic shock syndrome in patients with comorbidities that include thrombocytopenia.

A phase I study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of contezolid acefosamil after intravenous and oral administration in healthy Chinese subjects.

Contezolid acefosamil (also known as MRX-4), a prodrug of contezolid, is under development for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. A phase I single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-dose placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of contezolid acefosamil in healthy Chinese subjects following intravenous (IV) and oral administration. Adverse events (AEs) and PK parameters were assessed appropriately. All subjects (n = 70) completed the trial. Overall, 67 cases of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 49.1% (27 of 55) of the subjects receiving contezolid acefosamil. All TEAEs were mild in severity. No serious AEs or deaths were reported. After IV SAD (500-2,000 mg), the corresponding C max of the active drug contezolid increased from 1.95 ± 0.57 to 15.61 ± 4.88 mg/L, AUC0-inf from 40.25 ± 10.12 to 129.41 ± 38.30 h·mg/L, median T max from 2.00 to 2.75 h, and mean t 1/2 from 13.33 to 16.74 h. Plasma contezolid reached steady state on day 6 after multiple IV doses, with an accumulation ratio of 2.20-2.96. Oral SAD of 500 and 1,500 mg resulted in contezolid C max of 8.66 ± 2.60 and 37.10 ± 8.66 mg/L, AUC0-inf of 30.44 ± 7.33 and 162.36 ± 47.08 h·mg/L, and median T max of 2.50 and 2.98 h. Contezolid reached steady state on day 5 after multiple oral doses of 1,500 mg without significant accumulation. Contezolid C max and AUC0-inf increased with the dose of contezolid acefosamil. The good safety and PK profiles in this SAD and multiple-dose study can support further clinical development of contezolid acefosamil.

Long-term safety and efficacy of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease.

AIMS: REVEAL was the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate that adding cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor therapy to intensive statin therapy reduced the risk of major coronary events. We now report results from extended follow-up beyond the scheduled study treatment period. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 30 449 adults with prior atherosclerotic vascular disease were randomly allocated to anacetrapib 100 mg daily or matching placebo, in addition to open-label atorvastatin therapy. After stopping the randomly allocated treatment, 26 129 survivors entered a post-trial follow-up period, blind to their original treatment allocation. The primary outcome was first post-randomization major coronary event (i.e. coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) during the in-trial and post-trial treatment periods, with analysis by intention-to-treat. Allocation to anacetrapib conferred a 9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3-15%; P = 0.004] proportional reduction in the incidence of major coronary events during the study treatment period (median 4.1 years). During extended follow-up (median 2.2 years), there was a further 20% (95% CI 10-29%; P < 0.001) reduction. Overall, there was a 12% (95% CI 7-17%, P < 0.001) proportional reduction in major coronary events during the overall follow-up period (median 6.3 years), corresponding to a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0-2.6%) absolute reduction. There were no significant effects on non-vascular mortality, site-specific cancer, or other serious adverse events. Morbidity follow-up was obtained for 25 784 (99%) participants. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of anacetrapib on major coronary events increased with longer follow-up, and no adverse effects emerged on non-vascular mortality or morbidity. These findings illustrate the importance of sufficiently long treatment and follow-up duration in randomized trials of lipid-modifying agents to assess their full benefits and potential harms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 48678192; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01252953; EudraCT No. 2010-023467-18.

Single Ascending-Dose Study To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Sutezolid in Healthy Adult Subjects.

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single oral doses of sutezolid tablets administered under fasting conditions in healthy adult subjects. The secondary objective was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sutezolid and two metabolites, PNU-101603 and PNU-101244. Overall, sutezolid was well tolerated when administered as a 300-mg, 600-mg, 1,200-mg, or 1,800-mg dose in healthy adult subjects under fasting conditions. Maximum concentration (Cmax) of sutezolid, PNU-101603, and PNU-101244 increased in a less-than-proportional manner with an increase in sutezolid dose between 300 mg and 1,800 mg. Total exposure (AUClast [area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration] and AUCinf [area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity]) of sutezolid, PNU-101603, and PNU-101244 increased proportionally with an increase in sutezolid dose.

A Phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

OBJECTIVES: Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agent for managing infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant strains. A Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). METHODS: Adult patients with cSSTI were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive contezolid 800 mg or linezolid 600 mg q12h for 7-14 days. Clinical cure rate and safety were assessed at the test of cure (TOC) visit in the full analysis set (FAS) and clinical evaluable (CE) population. Non-inferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% CI around the treatment difference of clinical cure rates greater than -10%. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn registration identifier: CTR20150855. RESULTS: Clinical cure rates at TOC indicated non-inferiority of contezolid 800 mg to linezolid 600 mg q12h for patients in the FAS with clinical evaluation, FAS, and CE populations: 92.8% (271/292) versus 93.4% (284/304) (difference -0.6%, 95% CI: -4.7% to 3.5%), 81.4% (271/333) versus 84.5% (284/336) (difference -3.1%, 95% CI: -8.8% to 2.6%) and 90.5% (267/295) versus 90.1% (282/313) (difference 0.4%, 95% CI: -4.3% to 5.1%). Contezolid and linezolid showed similar efficacy for the cSSTIs caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Contezolid demonstrated significant lower incidence of leucopenia (0.3% versus 3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (0% versus 2.3%) than linezolid. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Contezolid 800 mg q12h is as effective as linezolid for treatment of cSSTIs in adults, but safer than linezolid in terms of haematological abnormalities.

Long-term use of tedizolid for pulmonary nocardiosis.

Nocardiosis usually occurs in immunocompromised patients and causes infections in various organs, including the lungs, skin, and organs of the central nervous system. Herein, we report the case of a patient with minimal change nephrotic syndrome who had been on immunosuppressive drugs and developed pulmonary nocardiosis due to Nocardia nova complex and Pneumocystis pneumonia. For pulmonary nocardiosis, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, and clarithromycin were initiated sequentially, but were subsequently discontinued due to side effects; the treatment was completed with tedizolid. Tedizolid was used safely for 200 out of 286 days of antibiotic treatment, and clinical improvement was observed. Tedizolid is a bacteriostatic oxazolidine antibiotic that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, the same mechanism as its predecessor, linezolid. Tedizolid is thought to cause less frequent myelosuppression than linezolid, at least for short-term use. In the future, tedizolid may be a promising alternative to linezolid in cases of nocardiosis that usually require long-term treatment.

Efficacy and safety of tedizolid for the treatment of ventilated gram-positive hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in Japanese patients: Results from a subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study comparing tedizolid and linezolid.

INTRODUCTION: The results from the phase 3 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid phosphate, an oxazolidinone drug, for the treatment of gram-positive ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (vHABP)/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) compared with linezolid (VITAL study), have been previously reported. We conducted a subgroup analysis to report the data obtained from Japanese patients enrolled in this study. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with vHABP/VABP likely to be caused by gram-positive cocci were randomized 1:1 to tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days. In both treatment groups, patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia were treated for 14 days. Primary efficacy endpoints were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test-of-cure (TOC) in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes included assessment of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: Fifty-three Japanese patients were randomized at received study drug (tedizolid, n = 28; linezolid, n = 25). Demographics and characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups. Rates of day 28 ACM were 10.7% and 20.0% with tedizolid and linezolid, respectively (difference, 9.3%; 95% CI, -10.1 to 28.7). Rates of investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC were 78.6% and 72.0% with tedizolid and linezolid, respectively (difference, 6.6%; 95% CI, -16.7 to 29.8). Tedizolid phosphate was generally well tolerated and no new safety concerns were observed in the Japanese subgroup. CONCLUSION: The results from this subgroup analysis suggest generally favorable efficacy and safety of tedizolid in adult Japanese patients with vHABP/VABP. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02019420).

Tedizolid: a service evaluation in a large UK teaching hospital.

Tedizolid is a new oxazolidinone antibiotic with little real-life data on use outside of skin and soft tissue infections. There is a paucity of safety evidence in courses greater than 6 days. Our centre uses tedizolid predominantly when linezolid-associated adverse events have occurred. This service evaluation describes our experience to date. We performed a retrospective service evaluation by reviewing case notes, prescription charts, and laboratory system results for each patient prescribed tedizolid at our hospital and recording patient demographics, clinical details, and outcomes. Sixty patients received tedizolid between May 2016 and November 2018. Most were treated for bone or joint infections and had stopped linezolid prior to tedizolid prescription. Mean length of tedizolid therapy was 27 days. Haematological adverse effects were infrequent. Most patients (72%) finished the course and their clinical condition improved during treatment (72%). Adverse events were common, but often not thought to be tedizolid related. Tedizolid appears to be safe in prolonged courses within this context. It may be suitable for longer-term antibiotic therapy within a complex oral and parenteral outpatient antibiotic therapy (COPAT) service. Patients who do not tolerate linezolid can be safely switched to tedizolid if appropriate.

Long term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intracutaneous zolmitriptan (M207) in the acute treatment of migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term safety and tolerability profile of M207 in the acute treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND: M207 is an investigational microneedle-based system for intracutaneous delivery of zolmitriptan for the treatment of migraine attacks. Following on the positive results of a Phase 2/3 placebo-controlled efficacy study (ZOTRIP), this study was designed to evaluate the safety of this novel product during repeated use for the treatment of migraine attacks. METHODS: In this 6-12 month open-label, multicenter observational study, participants used an eDiary to record headache symptoms and adverse events at specified intervals up to 48 h following treatment of a qualifying attack with M207 3.8 mg (intracutaneous zolmitriptan). Participants underwent clinical evaluations at specified intervals up to 12 months. RESULTS: Among 335 participants who treated ≥1 migraine attack, 257 completed 6 months and 127 completed 1 year of treatment. The most common reason for withdrawal from the study was a low frequency of reported attacks post randomization. Overall, 5963 migraine attacks were treated. Most participants (96%) experienced at least 1 adverse event, the vast majority of which concerned the application site, and > 95% of which were mild. Fifteen participants (4%) withdrew due to adverse events; 4 withdrew due to 7 application site reactions, 6 of which were mild. Participants achieved pain freedom in 2477/5617 (44%) of attacks, most bothersome symptom freedom in 3315/5330 (62%) of attacks, and pain relief 2 h post-dose in 4552/5617 (81%) of attacks. Sustained pain freedom 2-24 h was seen in 1761/4698 (38%) of attacks, and 2-48 h in 1534/4429 (35%) of attacks. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants experienced cutaneous adverse reactions such as application site erythema, swelling, and bleeding, and most reactions were scored as mild. These results are consistent with what was observed in the single migraine attack treatment ZOTRIP trial indicating that M207 is well tolerated in the setting of longer-term repeated use. Efficacy findings were also similar to those in the ZOTRIP trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov on September 13, 2017 ( NCT03282227 ).

Effects of Anacetrapib in Patients with Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease remain at high risk for cardiovascular events despite effective statin-based treatment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. The inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) by anacetrapib reduces LDL cholesterol levels and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. However, trials of other CETP inhibitors have shown neutral or adverse effects on cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 30,449 adults with atherosclerotic vascular disease who were receiving intensive atorvastatin therapy and who had a mean LDL cholesterol level of 61 mg per deciliter (1.58 mmol per liter), a mean non-HDL cholesterol level of 92 mg per deciliter (2.38 mmol per liter), and a mean HDL cholesterol level of 40 mg per deciliter (1.03 mmol per liter). The patients were assigned to receive either 100 mg of anacetrapib once daily (15,225 patients) or matching placebo (15,224 patients). The primary outcome was the first major coronary event, a composite of coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 4.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in significantly fewer patients in the anacetrapib group than in the placebo group (1640 of 15,225 patients [10.8%] vs. 1803 of 15,224 patients [11.8%]; rate ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 0.97; P=0.004). The relative difference in risk was similar across multiple prespecified subgroups. At the trial midpoint, the mean level of HDL cholesterol was higher by 43 mg per deciliter (1.12 mmol per liter) in the anacetrapib group than in the placebo group (a relative difference of 104%), and the mean level of non-HDL cholesterol was lower by 17 mg per deciliter (0.44 mmol per liter), a relative difference of -18%. There were no significant between-group differences in the risk of death, cancer, or other serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease who were receiving intensive statin therapy, the use of anacetrapib resulted in a lower incidence of major coronary events than the use of placebo. (Funded by Merck and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN48678192 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252953 ; and EudraCT number, 2010-023467-18 .).

The first case of teeth discoloration induced by linezolid in children in China Mainland.

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent often used to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. The common adverse reactions of linezolid are diarrhea, nausea, headache and bone marrow suppression, and so on. Here, we report the first case of teeth discoloration induced by linezolid linked with extrinsic discoloration in China Mainland. This case report highlights a rare adverse reactions of a commonly used antibiotic.

Oxazolidinones Can Replace Clarithromycin in Combination with Rifampin in a Mouse Model of Buruli Ulcer.

Rifampin (RIF) plus clarithromycin (CLR) for 8 weeks is now the standard of care for Buruli ulcer (BU) treatment, but CLR may not be an ideal companion for rifamycins due to bidirectional drug-drug interactions. The oxazolidinone linezolid (LZD) was previously shown to be active against Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in mice but has dose- and duration-dependent toxicity in humans. Sutezolid (SZD) and tedizolid (TZD) may be safer than LZD. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of these oxazolidinones in combination with rifampin in a murine BU model. Mice with M. ulcerans-infected footpads received control regimens of RIF plus either streptomycin (STR) or CLR or test regimens of RIF plus either LZD (1 of 2 doses), SZD, or TZD for up to 8 weeks. All combination regimens reduced the swelling and bacterial burden in footpads after two weeks of treatment compared with RIF alone. RIF+SZD was the most active test regimen, while RIF+LZD was also no less active than RIF+CLR. After 4 and 6 weeks of treatment, neither CLR nor the oxazolidinones added significant bactericidal activity to RIF alone. By the end of 8 weeks of treatment, all regimens rendered footpads culture negative. We conclude that SZD and LZD warrant consideration as alternative companion agents to CLR in combination with RIF to treat BU, especially when CLR is contraindicated, intolerable, or unavailable. Further evaluation could prove SZD superior to CLR in this combination.

Concentration-response modeling of ECG data from early-phase clinical studies to assess QT prolongation risk of contezolid (MRX-I), an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent.

The effects of contezolid (MRX-I, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent) on cardiac repolarization were evaluated retrospectively using a population modeling approach in a Phase I study incorporating single ascending dose, multiple ascending dose, and food effect assessments. Linear mixed effect models were used to assess the relationships between MRX-I plasma concentrations and QT/QTc/∆QTc (baseline-adjusted), in which different correction methods for heart rate have been included. The upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for predicted ∆∆QTc was < 10 ms (ms) at therapeutic doses of MRX-I. Model performance/suitability was determined using diagnostic evaluations, which indicated rationality of one-stage concentration-QT model, as well as C-QT model suggested by Garnett et al. The finding demonstrated that MRX-I may have no clinical effects on the QT interval. Concentration-QT model may be an alternative to conventional thorough QT studies.

Thrombocytopenia with Tedizolid and Linezolid.

Several studies have suggested the risk of thrombocytopenia with tedizolid, a second-in-class oxazolidinone antibiotic (approved June 2014), is less than that observed with linezolid (first-in-class oxazolidinone). Using data from the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (July 2014 through December 2016), we observed significantly increased risks of thrombocytopenia of similar magnitudes with both antibiotics: linezolid reporting odds ratio [ROR], 37.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.78 to 69.17); tedizolid ROR, 34.0 (95% CI, 4.67 to 247.30).

Mitochondrial Alterations (Inhibition of Mitochondrial Protein Expression, Oxidative Metabolism, and Ultrastructure) Induced by Linezolid and Tedizolid at Clinically Relevant Concentrations in Cultured Human HL-60 Promyelocytes and THP-1 Monocytes.

Linezolid, the first clinically available oxazolidinone antibiotic, causes potentially severe toxicities (myelosuppression, lactic acidosis, and neuropathies) ascribed to impairment of mitochondrial protein synthesis and consecutive mitochondrial dysfunction. Tedizolid, a newly approved oxazolidinone, shows an enhanced activity compared to linezolid but is also a more potent inhibitor of mitochondrial protein synthesis. We compared linezolid and tedizolid for (i) inhibition of the expression of subunit I of cytochrome c-oxidase (CYTox I; Western blot analysis), (ii) cytochrome c-oxidase activity (biochemical assay), (iii) mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (Seahorse technology), and (iv) alteration of mitochondrial ultrastructure (electron microscopy) using HL-60 promyelocytes and THP-1 monocytes exposed to microbiologically (multiples of modal MIC against Staphylococcus aureus) and therapeutically (Cmin - Cmax) pertinent concentrations. Both drugs caused a rapid and complete (48 to 72 h) inhibition of CYTox I expression, cytochrome c-oxidase activity, and spare respiratory capacity, with conspicuous swelling of the mitochondrial matrix and loss of their cristae. Globally, tedizolid was a more potent inhibitor than linezolid. For both drugs, all effects were quickly (48 to 72 h) and fully reversible upon drug withdrawal. Using an alternation of exposure to and withdrawal from drug mimicking their approved schedule of administration (twice daily and once daily [qD] for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively), only partial inhibition of CYTox I expression was noted for up to 96 h. Thus, rapid reversal of toxic effects upon discontinuous administration may mitigate oxazolidinone toxicity. Since tedizolid is given qD, this may help to explain its reported lower preclinical and clinical toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Oral LCB01-0371, a Novel Oxazolidinone with Broad-Spectrum Activity, in Healthy Volunteers.

LCB01-0371 is a novel oxazolidinone with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive pathogens in both in vitro studies and animal infection models. The objectives of this study were to evaluate its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics following single ascending doses. Single oral doses of 600 mg linezolid, a placebo, or LCB01-0371 of between 50 mg and 3,200 mg were tested in 69 healthy male subjects. Blood and urine were sampled, LCB01-0371 concentrations were measured, and the serum inhibitory and bactericidal titers of LCB01-0371 and linezolid were determined. LCB01-0371 was well tolerated up to 2,400 mg. The most common drug-related clinical and laboratory adverse events were nausea with or without vomiting, decreased neutrophil counts, and increased total bilirubin levels. The frequency of adverse events and drug-related adverse events was similar among the treatment groups. The systemic exposure was approximately dose proportional over the range of 50 mg to 800 mg, which includes the anticipated clinical dose. The mean clearance, renal clearance, and volume of distribution were significantly decreased at higher doses (above 800 mg). LCB01-0371 exhibited early bacteriostatic activity against all tested strains except for Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, and the potency of LCB01-0371 at 800 mg was similar to that of linezolid at the therapeutic dose (600 mg). However, LCB01-0371 had less bactericidal activity than linezolid. Taken together, LCB01-0371 was well tolerated, exhibited approximate dose proportionality within the anticipated clinically relevant dose range, and showed bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity comparable to that of linezolid. These results support the further clinical development of LCB01-0371. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01554995.).

The role of tedizolid in skin and soft tissue infections.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Tedizolid is a second-generation oxazolidinone with activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA isolates resistant to linezolid. Pivotal clinical trials showed that tedizolid at 200 mg once-daily for 6 days is not inferior to linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days in patients with SSTI. The comparison of adverse events is favorable to tedizolid under the circumstances of the clinical trials. This is a review of recent literature on tedizolid, its use in special populations and potential adverse effects. RECENT FINDINGS: Findings suggest that tedizolid can be used in SSTI in adolescents, those older than 65 years, obese individuals and patients with diabetic foot infections. Forthcoming research to determine the future uses of this drug in other clinical syndromes requires demonstration of tolerance whenever tedizolid is administered for longer than 6 days.We also speculate on missing data and potential future indications of tedizolid in the highly competitive field of the treatment of severe Gram-positive infections other than SSTI. SUMMARY: Tedizolid is a second-generation oxazolidinone, very convenient for treatment of SSTI, in search for other indications including nosocomial pneumonia and bone and joint infections. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of 21 day multiple oral administration of a new oxazolidinone antibiotic, LCB01-0371, in healthy male subjects.

BACKGROUND: LCB01-0371 is a new oxazolidinone antibiotic, which targets most Gram-positive organisms. High rates of adverse reactions including myelosuppression have been reported for existing oxazolidinones, limiting their long-term use. OBJECTIVES: The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 21 day multiple oral administrations of LCB01-0371 in healthy male subjects (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02540460) were investigated. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects received 800 mg of LCB01-0371 once or twice daily or 1200 mg of LCB01-0371 twice-daily for 21 days in a fasting state. Safety and tolerability profiles including laboratory tests were evaluated during the study and on a post-study visit and the results were analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA). Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 12 h after dosing on day 21. RESULTS: A total of 40 subjects were enrolled and 34 subjects completed the study. Two subjects dropped out according to stopping rules. In the 1200 mg twice-daily dose group, the absolute value of red blood cell count, haematocrit and haemoglobin decreased by 500 × 106/L (6.5%), 4.5% (6.8%) and 1.6 g/dL (6.9%), respectively, after 21 day administrations of LCB01-0371. However, mean relative changes from baseline of all haematology values were not significantly different among doses, including placebo (all, P < 0.05). PK profiles of LCB01-0371 in the dose range of 800 mg once daily to 1200 mg twice daily were consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: LCB01-0371 is well tolerated in healthy male subjects with comparable haematology profiles to placebo, after multiple doses of up to 1200 mg twice daily for 21 days.