Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 119
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 59(4): 283-287, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33704102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While optimal utilization of the nurse practitioner (NP) workforce is an increasingly popular proposal to alleviate the growing primary care shortage, federal, state, and organizational scope of practice policies inhibit NPs from practicing to the full extent of their license and training. In March of 2020, NP state-specific supervisory requirements were temporarily waived to meet the demands of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Massachusetts. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of temporarily waived state practice restrictions on NP perception of care delivery during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in Massachusetts. RESEARCH DESIGN: Mixed methods descriptive analysis of a web-based survey of Massachusetts NPs (N=391), conducted in May and June 2020. RESULTS: The vast majority (75%) of NPs believed the temporary removal of practice restriction did not perceptibly improve clinical work. Psychiatric mental health NPs were significantly more likely than other NP specialties to believe the waiver improved clinical work (odds ratio=6.68, P=0.001). NPs that experienced an increase in working hours during the pandemic surge were also more likely to report a positive effect of the waiver (odds ratio=2.56, P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary removal of state-level practice barriers alone is not sufficient to achieve immediate full scope of practice for NPs. The successful implementation of modernized scope of practice laws may require a collective effort to revise organizational and payer policies accordingly.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Enfermeras Practicantes/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Certificación , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Enfermeras Practicantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Autonomía Profesional , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración
2.
Br J Nurs ; 30(14): S14-S22, 2021 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34288752

RESUMEN

In the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency classifies 'pre-filled syringes' for flushing Intravenous (IV) cannulas and IV access devices as 'borderline' devices and offers some advice on how control measures can help mitigate risks. The Medicines Act (1968) and Medical Device Regulations try to address the legal position of these devices and allow each employer to identify those groups of staff allowed to use them. In turn, this may help address anomalies around the need to prescribe and document their use. This article describes how one large university health board in Wales implemented a change in products and practice and explores the issues around adopting and using CE-marked pre-filled, sterile syringes of 0.9% sodium chloride in place of manually drawing up an IV flush (the CE mark indicates devices that conforms with European legal requirements). Whether the use of individual components or a single pre-filled device can lead to a streamlined and cost-effective way to manage the flushing of IV cannula and vascular access devices was explored. Additional risk factors were identified, and the legal status clarified in line with current guidelines and regulations. As 0.9% sodium chloride in ampoules and vials is classified as a prescription-only medicine, the administration needs control via formal prescription or a patient group direction. Adopting and using these pre-filled syringes as CE-marked medical devices requires careful consideration and sign-off from each employing authority, before implementing them for flushing IV cannulas and IV access devices.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Solución Salina , Jeringas , Irrigación Terapéutica , Cánula , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Solución Salina/administración & dosificación , Irrigación Terapéutica/instrumentación , Irrigación Terapéutica/enfermería , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Gales
3.
J Surg Res ; 247: 556-562, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gun violence remains a staggering public health care crisis. Although viewing the victim's body is essential to the grieving process, this practice is not universally practiced in the trauma bay and may not be supported by nurses. This study investigates how trauma nurses perceive bereavement and the potential barriers to family viewing after death by gun violence. METHODS: A survey designed to assess demographics, current practices, knowledge of policies, and personal beliefs regarding family viewing after violent crime was sent electronically to members of the Society of Trauma Nurses. Participants were asked to rank the importance of 14 viewing barriers. Descriptive analysis and perception of barriers between those who did and did not permit viewing were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. *P < 0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 212 participants, the majority were white, female nurses (86%), aged 30 to 60 y who worked in an urban or suburban setting (58% and 30%). Only 15% had a written hospital policy with the majority not knowing if the police (68%) or medical examiner (74%) had written policies. Despite lack of guidelines, viewings did routinely occur (68%), but only 37% permitted touching. Nurses who did not permit viewing were more likely to rank legal concerns and trauma bay environment as significant barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Although family viewing after gun violence frequently occurs in the trauma bay, there are significant barriers that are compounded by lack of formal policies. Collaboration with police and medical examiners could mitigate these fears while promoting a safe and more family-centered experience.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Familia/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Adulto , Femenino , Violencia con Armas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Políticas , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto Joven
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 176, 2020 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nursing resources can have a protective effect on patient outcomes, but nurses and nursing scope of practice have not been studied in relation to injury outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine whether scope of practice and ease of practice laws for nurse practitioners and registered nurses are associated with suicide and homicide rates in the United States. METHODS: This state-level analysis used data from 2012 to 2016. The outcome variables were age-adjusted suicide and homicide rates. The predictor variables were NP scope of practice by state (limited, partial, or full) and RN ease of practice (state RN licensure compact membership status). Covariates were state sociodemographic, healthcare, and firearm/firearm policy context variables that have a known relationship with the outcomes. RESULTS: Full scope of practice for NPs was associated with lower rates of suicide and homicide, with stronger associations for suicide. Likewise, greater ease of practice for RNs was associated with lower suicide and homicide rates. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that nurses are an important component of the healthcare ecosystem as it relates to injury outcomes. Laws supporting full nursing practice may have a protective effect on population health in the area of injuries and future studies should explore this relationship further.


Asunto(s)
Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Practicantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs ; 34(5): 370-376, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032760

RESUMEN

The first key message in the landmark Future of Nursing report is that "Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training" (Institute of Medicine, 2011). Although there has been significant progress across states to remove or diminish barriers to the exercise of full scope of practice by advanced practice registered nurses (APRN), state regulations continue to unnecessarily restrict APRN practice in most of the United States. This article integrates data from studies that examine how state and local regulation affects psychiatric mental health APRN practice with the literature on how state scope of practice regulation affects the size and distribution of the broader APRN workforce, access to care, health care costs and prices, and innovation in health care service delivery. Common themes include confusion about regulatory requirements and mixed experiences of mandated physician supervision.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/normas , Enfermeras Practicantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermería Psiquiátrica , Alcance de la Práctica , Gobierno Estatal , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Humanos , Alcance de la Práctica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alcance de la Práctica/tendencias , Estados Unidos
6.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 21(4): 222-232, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910736

RESUMEN

Across the United States, nursing practice acts (NPAs) have been revised to include provisions that promote full practice authority (FPA) for nurse practitioners (NPs). Such revisions provide a mechanism to better utilize the full scope of NP services to address growing demands for access to health care. Modernized NPAs that facilitate FPA for NPs are imperative, especially now with the unprecedented health care crisis that the world now faces: Coronavirus Disease 2019. This is the first known study to use an embedded single-case study design, guided by the Kingdon policy stream model, to provide a detailed account of how stakeholders for NP FPA determine the appropriate time to pursue legislative changes to NP scope of practice regulations. Qualitative data analysis revealed four themes which comprised the components considered by stakeholders during their decision-making processes related to NP FPA: participants, problem, policy development, and politics. Themes were further collapsed within concepts from the Kingdon model to form the case description. Study findings can be used to increase the competency among NP FPA stakeholders in determining the timing of legislative pursuits for regulatory change.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/enfermería , Enfermeras Practicantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neumonía Viral/enfermería , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Autonomía Profesional , COVID-19 , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
7.
Br J Nurs ; 29(1): 66-69, 2020 Jan 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917941

RESUMEN

Richard Griffith, Senior Lecturer in Health Law at Swansea University, discusses the revised framework for authorising the deprivation of liberty of a person who lacks capacity.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Reino Unido
8.
Rural Remote Health ; 20(4): 6068, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264566

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Rural hospitals in the USA are often served by advanced practice nurses, due to the difficulty for such facilities to recruit physicians. In order to facilitate a full range of services for patients, some states permit advanced practice nurses to practice with full independence. However, many states limit their scopes of practice, resulting in the potential for limited healthcare access in underserved areas. The COVID-19 pandemic temporarily upended these arrangements for several states, as 17 governors quickly passed waivers and suspensions of physician oversight restrictions. ISSUES: Physician resistance is a primary hurdle for states that limit advanced practice nurse scopes of practice. Longstanding restrictions were removed, however, in a short period of time. The pandemic demonstrated that even governors with strong political disagreements agreed on one way that healthcare access could potentially be improved. LESSONS LEARNED: Despite longstanding concerns over patient safety when advanced practice nurses practice with full autonomy, governors quickly removed practice restrictions when faced with a crisis situation. Implied in such behavior are that policymakers were aware of advanced practice nurses' capabilities prior to the pandemic, but chose not to implement full practice authority, and that governors appeared to disagree as to whether to temporarily waive specific restrictions or suspend restrictions entirely, consistent with their political affiliation. We propose more research into understanding whether or not such changes should become permanent.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/legislación & jurisprudencia , COVID-19/terapia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Rol de la Enfermera , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/enfermería , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistentes Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración
9.
Nurs Outlook ; 66(6): 539-550, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) provide access to cost-effective, high quality care. APRNs are underutilized in states that restrict their practice. Removing restrictions could expand access to quality health care, cost-effectively relieve the physician shortage, and contribute economically. PURPOSE: This study forecasts the health system and economic impacts of reducing practice restrictions for Florida APRNs. METHODS: The analysis utilized a number of data sources and IMPLAN software and estimated changes in APRN supply given less restrictive practice laws, and consequential health system and economic benefits. FINDINGS: Between 2013 and 2025 APRN full time equivalents could increase an additional 11% with less restrictive practice regulations. This could eliminate or reduce the shortage of different types of physicians. Health care cost-savings could be $50 to $493 per resident. There would be a number of general economic benefits. DISCUSSION: A number of health system and economic benefits would ensue from less restrictive APRN regulation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/economía , Florida , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos
10.
Nurs Health Sci ; 19(3): 373-380, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28752535

RESUMEN

In this cross-sectional study, we explored course content related to pharmacology and/or healthcare products and supplies in all nursing degree programs in Spain. Changes in nurse-prescribing legislation in Spain require that nurses take a certification course before prescribing over-the-counter products and medications. Using a cross-sectional descriptive study, between July and September 2014, the degree programs of all centers that offer a degree in nursing in Spain were examined, selecting those with course information available online. All centers offered at least one pharmacology course. One-third of the required courses had content related to pharmacology and healthcare products/supplies. The analysis showed that the course content and training received during the current nursing degree program provides the knowledge and skills needed to prescribe healthcare products/supplies and medications that do not now require a doctor's prescription, without the need for additional training and certification. It is essential that government regulation of nursing education be aligned with nursing competencies, curriculum standards, clinical practice, and evidence-based research to provide the maximum level of confidence for nursing professionals and their patients.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Farmacología/educación , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Facultades de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , España
11.
Nursing ; 46(3): 51-4, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26910092

RESUMEN

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended in its 2010 report on the future of nursing that advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) should factor prominently in providing care to the millions of Americans who access healthcare services under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The IOM also recommended that APRNs practice to the full extent of their education and training.However, many states have laws in place that limit full practice authority for APRNs, specifically NPs, in providing basic health services such as primary care. These laws place restrictions on independent practice and Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement, which prevent nurses from "responding effectively to rapidly changing health care settings and an evolving health care system." Less than half of the United States has adopted full practice authority licensure and practice laws (see APRN practice authority at a glance). This article discusses how the primary care needs of millions of Americans can be met by granting full practice authority to APRNs nationwide and provides evidence to support the high level of care these practitioners can provide independently.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Autonomía Profesional , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estados Unidos
13.
J Law Med ; 22(4): 763-70, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26349377

RESUMEN

The timely and appropriate identification of, and response to, a patient's deteriorating condition by health professionals is essential for optimal patient outcomes and the avoidance of preventable harm. National regulatory authorities, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, State, Territory and federal health departments, health care facilities and institutions have all recognised the importance of implementing frameworks, standards and processes to facilitate the prompt recognition of the deteriorating patient and appropriate mechanisms for responding to and escalating such matters. Factors that may affect identification and response include the level of knowledge and skill of the health professionals, the culture of the organisation and the parameters of the assessment and audit tools. The 2014 findings of the Coroner in the inquest into the death of Graeme Barry Gulliver highlights the significance to nursing practice of recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient in an appropriate and timely manner.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Australia , Humanos , Leptospirosis/diagnóstico , Masculino
14.
Community Pract ; 88(2): 24-7, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25720210

RESUMEN

The publication of the fourth edition of Health for all children (Hall 4) in 2003 marked a shift in health visiting towards a more targeted service. This paper aims to explore, through the accounts of health visitors, the impacts of this changed policy context for health visiting practice and for the health visiting profession. The study, upon which this paper is based, was a qualitative exploration carried out in one NHS locality with broad socioeconomic diversity. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 16 health visitors. The data was analysed using thematic and narrative techniques. In the study health visitors expressed concerns about the impacts of Hall 4 on health visiting practice, particularly in relation to health visiting expertise and the increase focus on child protection work shaping health visiting practice. In conjunction, health visitors'accounts suggest low morale as a profession.The paper concludes that the impacts of future policy change on health visiting practice must be fully considered; and, measures taken to prepare and support health visitors through periods of policy change.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Enfermeros de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Medicina Estatal/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Política de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Enfermeros de Salud Comunitaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación Cualitativa , Medicina Estatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino Unido
16.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 46(1): 58-64, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24373129

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This article provides an overview of the implications for patients' health status and care needs when assessments are performed by nurses not licensed or competent to perform this task. The Waterlow scale (Judy Waterlow, The Nook, Stroke Road, Henlade, TAUNTON, TA3 5LX) scenario is used as a practice example to illustrate this case. ORGANIZATIONAL CONSTRUCT: The international nursing regulatory bodies, in South Africa called the South African Nursing Council, set the scope of practice wherein nurses are allowed to practice. Different categories of nurses are allowed to practice according to specified competencies, in alignment with their scope of practice. METHODS: A retrospective quantitative study was utilized. A checklist was used to perform an audit on a random sample of 157 out of an accessible population of 849 patient files. Data were gathered in May 2012, and the analysis was done using frequencies and percentages for categorical data. Reliability and validity were ensured, and all ethical principles were adhered to. FINDINGS: Eighty percent of risk assessments were performed by nurses not licensed or enrolled to perform this task unsupervised. Areas such as tissue malnutrition, neurological deficits, and medication were inaccurately scored, resulting in 50% of the Waterlow risk-assessment scales, as an example, being incorrectly interpreted. This has implications for quality nursing care and might put the patient and the institution at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-category nurses and student nurses should be allowed to perform only tasks within their scope of practice for which they are licensed or enrolled. Nurses with limited formal theoretical training are not adequately prepared to perform tasks unsupervised, even in the current global nursing shortage scenario. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To optimize and ensure safe and quality patient care, risk assessments should be done by a registered professional nurse, who will then coordinate the nursing care of the patient with the assistance of the lower category of nurses.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Seguridad del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sudáfrica
18.
Nurs Outlook ; 61(6): 392-9, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23707068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is widely recognized that there is significant state-level variation in scope-of-practice regulations (SSoPRs) for nurse practitioners (NPs). PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine whether SSoPRs influence labor markets for NPs. METHOD: Cross-sectional analysis examining how SSoPRs influence the number and growth in NPs; data from the Area Resource File and 2008 Pearson report were used. DISCUSSION: Restrictive SSoPRs reduced the number of NPs by about 10 per 100,000 and reduced the growth rate by 25%. No difference was found between states with the most restriction and those with some restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that changes to practice regulations should not be incremental but should follow the current practices in the least restrictive states. Results also indicate that other factors (poverty, uninsurance rates, rurality) decreased the number of NPs, suggesting that solving the primary care provider shortage will require multiple strategies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermeras Practicantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermeras Practicantes/provisión & distribución , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Médicos de Atención Primaria/provisión & distribución , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
19.
Nurs Outlook ; 61(5): 353-9, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24034469

RESUMEN

Sustained support of policy initiatives by nursing has resulted in significant legislative victories. One victory, the passage of the 1938 New York State Todd-Feld Act, which underwent legislative debate at a time when the nurse labor market was in disarray, during an economic depression, and before U.S. entry into World War II, reinforces our understanding that nursing must be a strong shepherd for policies beneficial for health care delivery. Designed to correct serious deficiencies in the nursing workforce, the act successfully required licensing for those working as registered and practical nurses. Yet, its provisions failed to stop all unlicensed nurse workers from practicing. Rapid changes occurring in the nurse labor market against the backdrop of growing hospital power over the employment of all nurse workers minimized the act's effectiveness. Policy implications include the need to focus on the complex nature of health care policy initiatives, flexibility in the face of changing circumstances, and acceptance of political realities.


Asunto(s)
Regulación Gubernamental/historia , Licencia en Enfermería/historia , Licencia en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración de Personal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/historia , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , New York
20.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 14(2): 69-78, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24177438

RESUMEN

Most research about regulatory policy change concerning expanded nursing activities has emphasized advanced practice roles and acute care settings. This study is a contribution to the small pool of research concerned with regulatory policy implementation for nurses undertaking expanded nursing practice activities in a public health context. Using the regulatory changes in certified nursing practice in one Canadian province as our starting point, we investigated the experiences of nurse leaders in implementing this change. Using a qualitative interpretive descriptive approach informed by tenets of complexity theory, we examined the experiences of 16 nurse leaders as situated within the larger public health care system in which nurses practice. Two interrelated themes, (a) preparing for certification and (b) the certification process, were identified to illustrate how competing and contrasting demands between health care and regulatory organizations created substantial barriers to policy change. Implications for health service delivery and future research are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Reproductiva , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/enfermería , Colombia Británica , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Humanos , Liderazgo , Masculino , Enfermeras Administradoras/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rol de la Enfermera , Investigación en Enfermería , Innovación Organizacional , Competencia Profesional , Salud Pública , Teoría de Sistemas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA