RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aseptic humeral stem loosening is an uncommon complication of shoulder arthroplasty, and its presence has been considered a highly specific predictor of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Literature on aseptic humeral stem loosening is sparse. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rate of aseptic humeral loosening in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Secondarily, we sought to identify predictors of septic and aseptic humeral loosening. METHODS: Our institutional revision shoulder arthroplasty database was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients with humeral stem loosening as indicated in the operative report. Patient demographics, index surgery and indication, revision surgery and indication, and operative data were recorded. Charts were manually reviewed, and PJI scores were calculated using the International Consensus Meeting scoring criteria. International Consensus Meeting classifications of PJI "unlikely" and "possible" were considered aseptic, and PJI "probable" and "definite" were considered septic. Statistical analysis was performed to determine associations between the abovementioned variables and aseptic humeral loosening. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with 48 shoulders were included in our analysis. Ten cases (21%) were classified as definite PJI, 13 cases (27%) were classified as probable PJI, 4 cases (8%) were classified as possible PJI, and 21 cases (44%) were classified as PJI unlikely. On analysis of stem design, there were no statistically significant associations with aseptic loosening; although, a lack of proximal porous ingrowth surface trended toward higher rates of aseptic loosening in all patients and in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) subgroup analyses. In the index RTSA subgroup, aseptic loosening was associated with female sex (P = .005). Seventeen of 39 shoulders (44%) that underwent either index ATSA or RTSA demonstrated concomitant glenoid loosening. The absence of glenoid loosening was associated with aseptic humeral loosening in index ATSA and RTSA (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Fifty-two % of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases with humeral loosening performed at our institution were aseptic. There appear to be distinct demographic and radiographic factors that are more commonly associated with aseptic as opposed to septic humeral loosening. Our data demonstrate that demographic predictors of aseptic loosening of RTSA include female sex. The absence of glenoid component loosening is associated with aseptic humeral loosening and concomitant glenoid loosening is associated with septic humeral loosening. Understanding of these factors can guide the preoperative index of suspicion for PJI in the setting of humeral stem loosening.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Falla de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reoperación , Prótesis de Hombro , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Húmero/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The goal of treating periprosthetic infection, besides its eradication, is to avoid recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of increasing Infection Severity (IS) score (based on the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Orthopedic Infections statement), single-stage revision, and pathogenicity of the infective organism on the risk of infection recurrence. METHODS: A database of 790 revisions performed by a single surgeon from 2004-2020 was reviewed for patients with minimum 2-year follow-up and ≥1 positive culture finding and/or pathology result from the revision surgical procedure. In total, 157 cases performed in 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. These cases were then categorized by infection probability (IS score) according to the 2018 consensus statement. Of 157 cases, 46 (29%) were classified as definitely or probably infected; 25 (16%), possibly infected; and 86 (55%), unlikely to be infected. Additionally, patients were grouped by single-stage surgery and pathogenicity of the infective organism. RESULTS: A recurrence in this study was classified as the growth of the same organism in any patient requiring revision surgery. The 86 cases in the group with unlikely infection showed a recurrence rate of 2.3%. The 25 cases in the group with possible infection showed a recurrence rate of 12%. The 46 cases in the group with definite or probable infection showed a recurrence rate of 17.4%. Patients in the definite/probable infection group had a higher rate of recurrence than those in the groups with possible infection and unlikely infection (P = .009). The IS score was higher in the recurrence group than the non-recurrence group (7.5 ± 4.3 vs. 3.9 ± 3.4, P < .001). Overall, patients who underwent 1-stage revision had a 5.0% recurrence rate, but among the 34 patients with an infection classification of definite or probable who underwent 1-stage revision, the recurrence rate was 5.9%. Cases of highly virulent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus also showed a recurrence rate of 30.8% compared with 4.0% and 5.9% for Cutibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative staphylococci, respectively (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Recurrent infection after treatment of a periprosthetic infection is associated with increasing severity scores, as defined in the 2018 consensus statement, and more aggressive microorganisms. However, a single-stage surgical procedure, even in patients with higher IS scores, did not impart a significantly increased risk of recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to facilitate preoperative identification of patients at risk for dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) using the Equinoxe rTSA prosthesis (medialized glenoid, lateralized onlay humerus with a 145° neck-shaft angle) and quantify the impact of accumulating risk factors on the occurrence of dislocation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 10,023 primary rTSA patients from an international multicenter database of a single platform shoulder prosthesis and quantified the dislocation rate associated with multiple combinations of previously identified risk factors. To adapt our statistical results for prospective identification of patients most at-risk for dislocation, we stratified our data set by multiple risk factor combinations and calculated the odds ratio for each cohort to quantify the impact of accumulating risk factors on dislocation. RESULTS: Of the 10,023 primary rTSA patients, 136 (52 female, 83 male, 1 unknown) were reported to have a dislocation for a rate of 1.4%. Patients with zero risk factors were rare, where only 12.7% of patients (1268 of 10,023) had no risk factors, and only 0.5% of these (6 of 1268) had a report of dislocation. The dislocation rate increased in patient cohorts with an increasing number of risk factors. Specifically, the dislocation rate increased from 0.9% for a patient cohort with 1 risk factor to 1.0% for 2 risk factors, 1.6% for 3 risk factors, 2.7% for 4 risk factors, 5.3% for 5 risk factors, and 7.3% for 6 risk factors. Stratifying dislocation rate by multiple risk factor combinations identified numerous cohorts with either an elevated risk or a diminished risk for dislocation. DISCUSSION: This multicenter study of 10,023 rTSA patients demonstrated that 1.4% of the patients experienced dislocation with one specific medialized glenoid-lateralized humerus onlay rTSA prosthesis. Stratifying patients by multiple combinations of risk factors demonstrated the impact of accumulating risk factors on the incidence of dislocation. rTSA patients with the greatest risk of dislocation were those of male sex, age ≤67 years at the time of surgery, patients with body mass index ≥31, patients who received cemented humeral stems, patients who received glenospheres having a diameter >40 mm, and/or patients who received expanded or laterally offset glenospheres. Patients with these risk factors who are considering rTSA using a medial glenoid-lateral humerus should be made aware of their elevated dislocation risk profile.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Diseño de Prótesis , Luxación del Hombro , Prótesis de Hombro , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Luxación del Hombro/cirugía , Luxación del Hombro/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Húmero/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases bony impingement and improves rotational range of motion, but has been theorized to increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine fractures (ASFs). The purpose of this study was to assess if glenoid-sided lateralization even up to 8 mm increases the risk for stress fracture following RSA with a 135° inlay humeral component. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from a multicenter prospectively collected database on patients who underwent primary RSA from 2015 to 2021. All RSAs were performed with a 135° inlay humeral component. Varying amounts of glenoid lateralization were used from 0 to 8 mm. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for the presence of acromial thinning, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and inclination. Postoperative implant position (distalization, lateralization, and inclination) as well as the presence of ASF was evaluated on minimum 1-year postoperative radiographs. Regression analyses were performed on component and clinical variables to assess for factors predictive of ASF. RESULTS: Acromial or scapular spine fractures were identified in 26 of 470 shoulders (5.5%). Glenoid-sided lateralization was not associated with ASF risk (P = .890). Furthermore, the incidence of fracture did not vary based on glenoid-sided lateralization (0-2 mm, 7.4%; 4 mm, 5.6%; 6 mm, 4.4%; 8 mm, 6.0%; P > .05 for all comparisons). RSA on the dominant extremity was predictive of fracture (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-5.75; P = .037), but there was no relationship between patient age, sex, preoperative acromial thinning, or diagnosis and risk of fracture. Although there was no difference in mean postoperative AHD between groups (P = .443), the pre- to postoperative delta AHD was higher in the stress fracture group (2.0 ± 0.7 cm vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 cm; P = .015). For every centimeter increase in delta AHD, there was a 121% increased risk for fracture (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.68; P = .012). Additionally, for every 1-mm increase in inferior glenosphere overhang, there was a 19% increase in fracture risk (P = .025). CONCLUSION: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided metallic lateralization does not appear to increase the risk of ASF when combined with a 135° inlay humeral implant. Humeral distalization increases the risk of ASF, particularly when there is a larger change between pre- and postoperative AHD or higher inferior glenosphere overhang. In cases of pronounced preoperative superior humeral migration, it may be a consideration to avoid excessive postoperative distalization, but minimizing bony impingement via glenoid-sided lateralization appears to be safe.
Asunto(s)
Acromion , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Fracturas por Estrés , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Fracturas por Estrés/etiología , Fracturas por Estrés/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Acromion/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escápula/diagnóstico por imagen , Escápula/lesiones , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Diseño de PrótesisRESUMEN
PURPOSE: When compared to standard-length humeral stem in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), short humeral stems in RTSA require good proximal humeral metaphyseal bone quality to gain proper and secure fixation during prosthetic implantation. Shorter humeral stems potentially carry more risk of misalignment than standard or long humeral stems. The hypothesis was that misalignment of the short humeral stems is influenced by regional bone quality. METHODS: RTSA with a short curved humeral stem with neck-shaft angle (NSA) default of 132.5° was reviewed. The study group included 35 cases at a mean age of 75.97 (± 6.23) years. Deltoid-tuberosity index (DTI) was measured to evaluate proximal humeral bone quality. The deltoid tuberosity index was measured at immediately above position of the upper end of the deltoid tuberosity. Stem alignment was given by the angle measured in degrees between the intramedullary humeral shaft axis and the axis of the humeral implant stem. RESULTS: The patient's mean DTI was 1.37 ± 0.16 (median, 1.32; range, 1.12-1.80). 22 patients had poor bone quality (DTI < 1.4), compared to 13 patients with acceptable bone quality (DTI > 1.4). After RTSA, ten humeral components (29%) were neutrally aligned, whereas 25 humeral components (71%) were misaligned. There was no correlation between misalignment and DTI (r = 0.117; p = 0.504). But there was a strong correlation between misalignment and the patient's own NSA (r = - 0.47; p = 0.004). The postoperative stem position and stem misalignment are not associated with functional outcomes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The misalignment of the short curved humeral stem frequently occurs. Poor reginal humeral bone quality does not influence misalignment after RTSA with a short humeral stem. Postoperative stem alignment is associated with the patient's preoperative NSA and method of neck cut. The misalignment does not affect functional outcomes for midterm follow-up. Further long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm its clinical relevance.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Húmero , Diseño de Prótesis , Prótesis de Hombro , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/métodos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Anciano , Húmero/cirugía , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
¼ Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was designed to function in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder by adjusting the glenohumeral center of rotation (COR) to maximize deltoid function.¼ Adjustments in the COR ultimately lead to changes in resting tension of the deltoid and remaining rotator cuff, which can affect implant stability and risk of stress fracture.¼ Soft-tissue balance and complication profiles can be affected by humeral component (version, neck shaft angle, and inlay vs. onlay) and glenoid component (sagittal placement, version, inclination, and lateralization) design and application.¼ A good understanding of the effects on soft-tissue balance and complication profile is critical for surgeons to best provide optimal patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Articulación del Hombro , Prótesis de Hombro , Humanos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Hombro/cirugía , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugíaRESUMEN
⤠No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).⤠Physicians rely on a combination of serological tests, synovial markers, and clinical findings plus clinical judgment to help to guide preoperative decision-making.⤠Several organizations have proposed criteria for the diagnosis of hip or knee PJI on which we now rely.⤠Given that shoulder arthroplasty has only recently become popular, it is possible that a shoulder-specific definition of PJI will be introduced in the coming years.⤠Although a number of serum and synovial markers have demonstrated high accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI of the hip and knee, further research is needed in order to identify markers that may be more suitable for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI and for the potential development and identification of specific serological tests as screening tools for PJI.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Biomarcadores , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/análisis , Líquido Sinovial/química , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Tecnologia: Hemiprótese de ombro ajustável. Próteses de cabeça excêntrica reproduzem a anatomia da extremidade proximal do úmero. Indicação: Reconstrução da extremidade proximal do úmero no tratamento de fraturas complexas de úmero. Pergunta: o tratamento cirúrgico é superior ao tratamento conservador, para tratamento de fratura proximal de úmero, com melhores desfechos funcionais, menos complicações, menor mortalidade? Os efeitos terapêuticos da prótese de ombro excêntrica são superiores aos da prótese de ombro Neer II em pacientes com fratura proximal de úmero submetidos a hemiartroplastia de ombro nos desfechos de resultados funcionais e complicações cirúrgicas? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado em bases de dados Pubmed, BVS e Google com estratégias estruturadas de busca. Foi feita avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR e para os estudos econômicos, foi utilizado o QHES checklist. Resultados: Foram identificados 485 registros nas bases de dados internacionais e nacionais. Após a remoção de duplicatas e exclusão dos não elegíveis, pela análise de título e resumo, foram selecionadas quatro revisões sistemáticas e um estudo econômico. Conclusão: Não há evidências suficientes de ensaios clínicos para informar qual a melhor escolha entre as intervenções (não cirúrgicas, cirúrgicas ou de reabilitação) para essas fraturas. Não foram encontrados estudos brasileiros sobre eficácia e custo-efetividade das diferentes abordagens cirúrgicas bem como os tipos e marcas de próteses entre si
Technology: Adjustable shoulder hemi prosthesis. Eccentric head prostheses reproduce the anatomy of the proximal extremity of the humerus. Indication: Reconstruction of the proximal extremity of the humerus in the treatment of complex humerus fractures. Question: Is surgical treatment superior to conservative treatment, for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures, with better functional outcomes, less complications, less mortality? Are the therapeutic effects of the eccentric shoulder prosthesis superior to those of the Neer II shoulder prosthesis in patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent shoulder hemiarthroplasty in the outcomes of functional results and surgical complications? Methods: Bibliographic survey was carried out in Pubmed, BVS and Google databases with structured search strategies. The methodological quality of systematic reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR tool and for economic studies, the QHES checklist was used. Results: Were they identified 485 records in international and national databases. After removing duplicates and excluding the ineligible ones, by analyzing the title and summary, four systematic reviews and one economic study were selected. Conclusion: There is not enough evidence of clinical trials to inform which is the best choice between interventions (nonsurgical, surgical or rehabilitation) for these fractures. No brazilian studies were found about the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the different surgical approaches, as well as the types and brands of prostheses between them
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas del Hombro/terapia , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro , Prótesis de Hombro/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicina Basada en la EvidenciaRESUMEN
El número de implantes protésicos de hombro se ha incrementado considerablemente en los últimos años, con el consiguiente aumento de las complicaciones derivadas de dicho procedimiento. El diagnóstico correcto de cada tipo de complicación es esencial para la toma de decisiones terapéuticas, y se basa actualmente en la información aportada tanto por las técnicas de radiodiagnóstico como de medicina nuclear. No obstante, ambos métodos diagnósticos presentan unas limitaciones intrínsecas que pueden ser superadas en gran medida con la incorporación de la imagen SPECT/TC, la cual está llamada a desempeñar un papel fundamental en la valoración de las prótesis de hombro
The incidence of prosthetic shoulder replacements has increased considerably in recent years, as well as the complications derived from the procedure. The correct diagnosis of each type of complication is essential for therapeutic decision making, which is currently based on the information provided by radiological and nuclear medicine imaging. Nevertheless, both techniques have intrinsic limitations that could be mostly overcome with the advent of the hybrid SPECT/CT imaging, which is set to play a fundamental role in the evaluation of shoulder prostheses