Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 89
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Public Health ; 194: 216-222, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962099

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: NHS Stop Smoking Services (NHS-SSS) have been available in the United Kingdom (UK) since 2000. The service has proven to be effective, however uptake remains below aspirations. Understanding people's willingness and reasons for accessing and engaging with NHS-SSS is, therefore, important. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the findings from qualitative research to understand people's views, perceptions and willingness to access NHS-SSS. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched for published qualitative studies, from Jan 2000 to Jan 2020. Following the screening, data extraction and quality assessment, data synthesis was conducted using meta-aggregation based on a patient-centred theoretical framework. We explored five 'demand-side' dimensions of service accessibility: the ability to perceive, seek, reach, pay and engage. Confidence in the synthesised findings relating to dependability and credibility was established using CONQual. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the review. Twelve categories emerged, contributing to five synthesised statements, all with a CONQual rating of moderate confidence. Access and willingness to use NHS-SSS were found to be related to an individual's readiness to perceive that smoking is a problem for which a solution should be sought, their ability to seek a perceived effective treatment, to conveniently reach NHS-SSS, their perceptions around associated costs and tailoring care to improve engagement with individuals. CONCLUSIONS: By using a theoretical framework incorporating healthcare access, this study provides policymakers valuable insights into people's willingness to access these services. Willingness to access NHS-SSS is multifaceted, nuanced and complex. Strategies to promote NHS-SSS uptake should include making services more attractive, relevant and responsive to individual perceptions around smoking and health. Given the higher prevalence of smoking in less affluent socioeconomic groups and in some ethnic minority groups, the importance of having a comprehensive and inclusive tobacco control policy, one that is linguistically and culturally sensitive, cannot be overstated.


Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Estatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa , Reino Unido
4.
Cancer ; 126(23): 5165-5172, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abstaining from smoking after a cancer diagnosis is critical to mitigating the risk of multiple adverse health outcomes. Although many patients with cancer attempt to quit smoking, the majority relapse. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of adapting an evidence-based smoking relapse prevention (SRP) intervention for patients with cancer. METHODS: The trial enrolled 412 patients newly diagnosed with cancer who had recently quit smoking. Participants were randomized to usual care (UC) or SRP. Participants in the UC group received the institution's standard of care for treating tobacco use. Participants in the SRP group in addition received a targeted educational DVD plus a validated self-help intervention for preventing smoking relapse. The primary outcome was smoking abstinence at 2 months, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: Abstinence rates for participants in the SRP and UC groups were 75% versus 71% at 2 months and 69% versus 64% at 6 months (Ps > .20). At 12 months, abstinence rates among survivors were 68% for those in the SRP group and 63% for those in the UC group (P = .38). Post hoc analyses revealed that across 2 months and 6 months, patients who were married/partnered were more likely to be abstinent after SRP than UC (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: A smoking relapse prevention intervention did not reduce relapse rates overall, but did appear to have benefited those participants who had the social support of a partner. Future work is needed to extend this effect to the larger population of patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Recurrencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo Social
5.
Ann Behav Med ; 54(2): 119-124, 2020 01 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219152

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are prevalent during pregnancy and the postpartum period and affect risk for smoking relapse. Whether and how depression affects response to postpartum interventions designed to sustain smoking abstinence is unknown. PURPOSE: We examined end-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms as a moderator of response to two postpartum-adapted smoking relapse prevention interventions. METHODS: Women (N = 300) who quit smoking during pregnancy were randomized to receive either a postpartum intervention focused on psychosocial factors linked to postpartum smoking (Strategies to Avoid Returning to Smoking [STARTS]) or an attention-controlled comparison intervention (SUPPORT). Women completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at the end of pregnancy. Smoking status was biochemically assessed at the end of pregnancy and at 12, 24, and 52 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: End-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms moderated response to postpartum smoking relapse prevention interventions (χ2 = 10.18, p = .001). After controlling for variables previously linked to postpartum smoking relapse, women with clinically significant end-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms (20%) were more likely to sustain abstinence through 52 weeks postpartum if they received STARTS. In contrast, women with few end-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms were more likely to sustain abstinence through 52 weeks postpartum if they received SUPPORT. Changes in the psychosocial factors addressed in the STARTS intervention did not mediate this moderation effect. CONCLUSION: Assessment of end-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms may help determine success following postpartum smoking relapse prevention interventions. Women with elevated end-of-pregnancy depressive symptoms benefited from postpartum relapse prevention intervention tailored to their psychosocial needs, while those with few symptoms were more successful in postpartum intervention that used standard behavioral components. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00757068.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Periodo Posparto , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 22(5): 747-755, 2020 04 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30852611

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration has increased communication efforts that aim to raise public awareness of the harmful constituents (ie, chemicals) in cigarette smoke. We sought to investigate whether the public's awareness of these chemicals has increased in light of such efforts. METHODS: Participants were national probability samples of 11 322 US adults and adolescents recruited in 2014-2015 (wave 1) and 2016-2017 (wave 2). Cross-sectional telephone surveys assessed awareness of 24 cigarette smoke chemicals at both timepoints. RESULTS: The proportion of US adults aware of cigarette smoke chemicals did not differ between waves 1 and 2 (25% and 26%, p = .19). In contrast, awareness of chemicals among adolescents fell from 28% to 22% (p < .001), mostly due to lower awareness of carbon monoxide, arsenic, benzene, and four other chemicals. Belief that most of the harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke come from burning the cigarette also fell from waves 1 to 2 (adults: 31% vs. 26%; adolescents: 47% vs. 41%, both ps < .05). Participants were more likely to be aware of cigarette smoke chemicals if they had been exposed to anti-smoking campaign advertisements (p < .05) or had previously sought chemical information (p < .05). Cigarette smoke chemical awareness did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: Awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals remains low and unchanged among adults and decreased somewhat among adolescents. The association of chemical awareness with information exposure via campaigns and information seeking behavior is promising. More concerted communication efforts may be needed to increase public awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals, which could potentially discourage smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Awareness of the toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke may contribute to quitting. The US Food and Drug Administration is making efforts to increase public awareness of these chemicals. Two national surveys (2014-2017) found that chemical awareness was low among adults and adolescents. Although awareness did not change among adults, awareness among adolescents dropped over time. In addition, exposure to anti-smoking campaigns and chemical information seeking behavior were associated with higher awareness of chemicals in cigarette smoke. Campaigns and other efforts may be needed to increase awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , No Fumadores/psicología , Humo/efectos adversos , Humo/análisis , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Productos de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto Joven
7.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 22(5): 638-646, 2020 04 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30590749

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Young adults have high smoking rates and low utilization of evidence-based smoking cessation strategies. We investigated smoking cessation intentions, strategy use, and socioeconomic predictors of strategy use among young adult smokers (age 18-24) and compared patterns with those of older adults (age 25-64). METHODS: We used a population-based sample from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study of young adult (n = 1,881) and older adult (n = 6,366) established smokers of conventional cigarettes at Wave 1 (2013-2014), who were surveyed at Wave 2 (2014-2015). Simple regression analysis compared intentions to quit between age groups. Among Wave 1 smokers who reported a Wave 2 quit attempt (young adults [YA] n = 748; older adults [OA] n = 2,068), bivariate and multinomial logistic regression estimated differences in use of behavioral support, pharmacotherapy, product substitution, and unassisted quit attempts. Interaction terms estimated age-group differences in relationships between predictors and cessation strategy use. RESULTS: Young adults planned to quit on a longer time frame, expressed lower interest in quitting, and were more confident they would be successful, compared with older adults. Young adults were significantly less likely to use pharmacotherapy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.15; confidence interval: 0.09, 0.24; reference: quitting unassisted). Both groups reported using product substitution (YA: 31.6%; OA: 28.5%), primarily with e-cigarettes, more than any evidence-based cessation strategy. Socioeconomic predictors of cessation strategy use did not differ between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: More research on why young adult smokers underutilize evidence-based cessation support is needed, as are innovative efforts to increase intentions to quit and utilization of cessation assistance. IMPLICATIONS: Young adulthood is a key transition time for tobacco use, and early cessation substantially reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality from smoking. In the context of high e-cigarette and polytobacco use, this study finds young adults have significantly less intention to quit than older adults and are less likely to use evidence-based cessation strategies to help quit. Innovative methods are needed to increase young adult intentions to quit and use of evidence-based cessation assistance.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Fumadores/psicología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/psicología , Vapeo/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , San Francisco/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vapeo/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 31, 2020 Jan 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31931742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy negatively impacts fetal health. Health agencies across countries have developed specific guidelines for health professionals in perinatal care to strengthen their role in smoking and alcohol use prevention. One such example is the "Guideline on Screening and Counselling for prevention of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption before, during, and after pregnancy" introduced by the Swiss Midwives Association in 2011. The current study assesses the changes in midwives' engagement in smoking and alcohol use prevention before (2008) and after the introduction of the Guideline (2018). Further, the current study examines differences across regions (German vs. French speaking regions), graduation years (before and after the introduction of the Guideline) and different work settings (hospital vs. self-employed). METHODS: Survey data were collected in 2008 (n = 366) and in 2018 (n = 459). Differences in how midwives engaged in smoking and alcohol use prevention between 2008 and 2018 were assessed with chi-square tests, as were differences across German and French speaking regions, graduation years (before and after the introduction of the Guideline) and across different work settings (working in hospitals or as self-employed). RESULTS: An increase in midwives' awareness of the risks of consuming even small quantities of cigarettes and alcohol for the unborn child between 2008 and 2018 is evident. Explaining the risks to pregnant women who smoke or use alcohol remained the most frequently reported prevention strategy. However, engagement with more extensive smoking and alcohol use preventive strategies across the whole course of pregnancy, such as assisting women in the elaboration of a plan to stop smoking/alcohol use, remained limited. CONCLUSIONS: Seven years after its introduction, the effectiveness of the Guideline in increasing midwives' engagement in smoking and alcohol use prevention appears limited despite midwives' increased awareness.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Partería/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/normas , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(4): e208-e217, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30942182

RESUMEN

Smokeless tobacco is consumed by 356 million people globally and is a leading cause of head and neck cancers. However, global efforts to control smokeless tobacco use trail behind the progress made in curbing cigarette consumption. In this Policy Review, we describe the extent of the policy implementation gap in smokeless tobacco control, discuss key reasons on why it exists, and make recommendations on how to bridge this gap. Although 180 countries have agreed that the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is the best approach to control the demand and supply of smokeless tobacco, only 138 (77%) Parties define smokeless tobacco in their statutes. Only 34 (19%) Parties tax or report taxing smokeless tobacco products, six (3%) measure content and emissions of smokeless tobacco products, and 41 (23%) mandate pictorial health warnings on these products. Although awareness of the harms related to smokeless tobacco is growing in many parts of the world, few Parties collect or present data on smokeless tobacco use under global or national surveillance mechanisms (eg, Global Tobacco Surveillance System and WHO STEPwise). Only 16 (9%) Parties have implemented a comprehensive ban on smokeless tobacco advertisement, promotion, and sponsorships. Globally, a smaller proportion of smokeless tobacco users are advised to quit the use of smokeless tobacco products compared to tobacco users. Use of smokeless tobacco is becoming a global cause of concern, requiring a greater commitment on the full implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control measures.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tabaco sin Humo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/normas , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Control Social Formal , Tabaco sin Humo/efectos adversos , Organización Mundial de la Salud
10.
Am J Public Health ; 109(7): 1007-1014, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31166743

RESUMEN

The US Food and Drug Administration is considering mandating a substantial reduction in the nicotine level of cigarettes and possibly other combusted tobacco products to render them minimially addictive. This would likely result in several public health benefits, including increased cessation, decreased progression to dependence, and reduced consumption of combusted tobacco products. However, findings from clinical trials of reduced-nicotine cigarettes suggest that many smokers consuming low nicotine-content cigarettes sought out regular nicotine-content cigarettes, even when they were asked to only smoke free low-nicotine cigarettes. If this policy were implemented without ensuring that cessation treatments and appealing alternative products (e.g., e-cigarettes) were readily available, some consumers would be likely to seek banned regular nicotine-content combusted tobacco products from illicit sources: retail, online, and individuals. Left unchecked, this illicit market could undermine the public health benefits of the policy. We describe supply and demand factors in an illicit market. Informed by the literature on controlling Internet tobacco sales and reducing illicit trade in low-cost cigarettes when there are price differentials, we recommend tracking and tracing products and greater surveillance and enforcement efforts to minimize illicit trade in normal nicotine products under a low-nicotine tobacco product standard.


Asunto(s)
Drogas Ilícitas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tabaquismo/prevención & control , Humanos , Mercadotecnía/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Prev Med ; 120: 144-149, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30703378

RESUMEN

Smoking prevalence differs among different racial/ethnic groups. Previous research found that as smoking prevalence declined in the U.S., remaining smokers made more quit attempts and smoked fewer cigarettes per day (CPD), indicating so-called softening. We examined California, a state with a highly diverse population, to assess whether there is differential softening among remaining smokers in different racial/ethnic groups. We used the California Tobacco Survey (1990-2008, N: 145,128). We ran logistic and linear regressions for smoking prevalence, CPD, quit attempts and time to first cigarette (30 min) as a function of race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, African American, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, other Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native) controlling for other demographics. Overall prevalence fell from 21.1% in 1990 to 12.3% in 2008 (p < 0.01), showing similar declining trends across all racial/ethnic groups (p = 0.44), albeit from different baseline prevalence levels. In terms of softening indicators the proportion with at least one quit attempt in the past 12 months increased from 46.2% to 59.3%, a factor of 1.25 per decade (95%CI = 1.17, 1.34) in the adjusted model. CPD declined from 16.9 to 10.9, by -2.95 CPD per decade (95%CI = -3.24, -2.67) in the adjusted model. There were no significant changes in the time to first cigarette. Interactions of race/ethnicity and time show similar trends among all subgroups expect Hispanics, whose CPD remained stable rather than declining. Although from different baseline levels, tobacco control policies have benefitted all subgroups of California smokers, exhibiting similar softening as prevalence fell. Interventions are still needed to reduce the baseline differences.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , California/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/etnología , Adulto Joven
12.
Prev Med ; 128: 105887, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711863

RESUMEN

This Special Issue of Preventive Medicine (PM) is the 6th in a series on behavior change, health, and health disparities. This is a topic of critical importance to improving U.S. population health. There is broad consensus that personal behavior patterns or lifestyle such as substance abuse, physical inactivity/obesity, and non-adherence with medical regimens are among the most important modifiable causes of chronic disease, premature death and population health. Hence, effectively promoting health-related behavior change needs to be a key component of health care research and policy. In this issue we devote the majority of space (14 of 20 reports) to the U.S. opioid epidemic, especially the ongoing but still woefully inadequate efforts to build the necessary clinical infrastructure in rural communities to effectively address the epidemic. The remaining six reports focus on addressing the substantive challenges that tobacco use and non-adherence with medical regimens represent in these same communities. While giving the opioid epidemic the attention that it well deserves, we cannot afford to do so at the expense of these other longstanding and also devastating public health problems. Across each of these topics we include contributions from well-regarded investigators, clinicians, and policymakers to acquaint readers with recent accomplishments while also noting knowledge gaps and unmet challenges.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Adictiva/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Fumadores/psicología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/psicología , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 19(1): 138, 2019 07 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers' survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult cigarette smokers. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Hong Kong, China. Smokers who completed a non-incentivized baseline telephone smoking survey were invited to a 3-month follow-up, with randomization into (1) the control group (no incentive), (2) a promised HK$100 (US$12.8) incentive upon completion, (3) a promised HK$200 (US$25.6) incentive upon completion, or (4) a prepaid HK$100 incentive plus another promised HK$100 incentive ("mixed incentive"). Crude risk ratios from log-binomial regression models were used to assess if the 3 incentive schemes predicted higher rates of consent at baseline or retention at 3-month than no incentive. RESULTS: In total, 1246 smokers were enrolled. The overall consent and retention rates were 37.1 and 23.0%, respectively. Both rates generally increased with the incentive amount and offer of prepaid incentive. The mixed incentive scheme marginally increased the retention rate versus no incentive (26.8% vs 20.3%; risk ratio (RR) = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00-1.76; P = 0.053), but not the consent rate (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93-1.38; P = 0.22). Among the consented participants, approximately 50% in the mixed incentive group received the mailed prepaid incentive, who achieved a higher retention rate than the group without incentives (82.8% vs 56.1%; RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21-1.80; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The mixed incentive scheme combining the prepaid and promised incentive was effective to increase the follow-up retention rate by 48%. We recommend this mixed incentive scheme to increase the follow-up retention rate. More efficient methods of delivering the incentive are needed to maximize its effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered, reference number: NCT03297866 ).


Asunto(s)
Motivación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Recompensa , Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Fumadores/psicología , Fumar/economía , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/psicología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto Joven
14.
Popul Health Metr ; 17(1): 20, 2019 12 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888689

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of reducing the prevalence of obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity, and introducing physical activity as an explicit intervention, on the burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), using Qatar as an example. METHODS: A population-level mathematical model was adapted and expanded. The model was stratified by sex, age group, risk factor status, T2DM status, and intervention status, and parameterized by nationally representative data. Modeled interventions were introduced in 2016, reached targeted level by 2031, and then maintained up to 2050. Diverse intervention scenarios were assessed and compared with a counter-factual no intervention baseline scenario. RESULTS: T2DM prevalence increased from 16.7% in 2016 to 24.0% in 2050 in the baseline scenario. By 2050, through halting the rise or reducing obesity prevalence by 10-50%, T2DM prevalence was reduced by 7.8-33.7%, incidence by 8.4-38.9%, and related deaths by 2.1-13.2%. For smoking, through halting the rise or reducing smoking prevalence by 10-50%, T2DM prevalence was reduced by 0.5-2.8%, incidence by 0.5-3.2%, and related deaths by 0.1-0.7%. For physical inactivity, through halting the rise or reducing physical inactivity prevalence by 10-50%, T2DM prevalence was reduced by 0.5-6.9%, incidence by 0.5-7.9%, and related deaths by 0.2-2.8%. Introduction of physical activity with varying intensity at 25% coverage reduced T2DM prevalence by 3.3-9.2%, incidence by 4.2-11.5%, and related deaths by 1.9-5.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Major reductions in T2DM incidence could be accomplished by reducing obesity, while modest reductions could be accomplished by reducing smoking and physical inactivity, or by introducing physical activity as an intervention.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad/prevención & control , Conducta Sedentaria , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Causalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Qatar , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Tob Control ; 28(Suppl 1): s61-s67, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29618494

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether mentioning free or lower cost smoking cessation medication as a trigger for thinking about quitting is related to higher medication use, more quit attempts and quit success, and whether these associations are modified by education and income. METHODS: Data were derived from the 2013 and 2014 surveys of the International Tobacco Control Netherlands (n=1164) and UK (n=768) cohort. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between mentioning in 2013 that free/lower cost smoking cessation medication was a trigger for thinking about quitting smoking and the use of medication, quit attempts and smoking cessation in 2014. RESULTS: 37.0% of smokers in the UK and 24.9% of smokers in the Netherlands mentioned free/lower cost medication as a trigger for thinking about quitting. Smokers who mentioned this trigger were more likely to have used cessation medication during a quit attempt both in the UK (OR=4.19, p<0.001) and in the Netherlands (OR=2.14, p=0.033). The association between mentioning free/lower cost medication as a trigger for thinking about quitting and actual quit attempts was significant in the UK (OR=1.45, p=0.030), but not in the Netherlands (OR=1.10, p=0.587). There was no significant association with quit success. Associations did not differ across income and education groups. CONCLUSION: Free/lower cost smoking cessation medication may increase the use of cessation medication and stimulate quit attempts among smokers with low, moderate and high education and income.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Agentes para el Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/economía , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 984, 2019 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite substantial positive impacts of Thailand's tobacco control policies on reducing the prevalence of smoking, current trends suggest that further reductions are needed to ensure that WHO's 2025 voluntary global target of a 30% relative reduction in tobacco use is met. In order to confirm this hypothesis, we aim to estimate the effect of tobacco control policies in Thailand on the prevalence of smoking and attributed deaths and assess the possibilities of achieving WHO's 2025 global target. This paper addresses this knowledge gap which will contribute to policy control measures on tobacco control. Results of this study can help guide policy makers in implementing further interventions to reduce the prevalence of smoking in Thailand. METHOD: A Markov chain model was developed to examine the effect of tobacco control policies, such as accessibility restrictions for youths, increased tobacco taxes and promotion of smoking cessation programs, from 2015 to 2025. Outcomes included smoking prevalence and the number of smoking-attributable deaths. Due to the very low prevalence of female smokers in 2014, this study applied the model to estimate the smoking prevalence and attributable mortality among males only. RESULTS: Given that the baseline prevalence of smoking in 2010 was 41.7% in males, the target of a 30% relative reduction requires that the prevalence be reduced to 29.2% by 2025. Under a baseline scenario where smoking initiation and cessation rates among males are attained by 2015, smoking prevalence rates will reduce to 37.8% in 2025. The combined tobacco control policies would further reduce the prevalence to 33.7% in 2025 and 89,600 deaths would be averted. CONCLUSION: Current tobacco control policies will substantially reduce the smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The combined interventions can reduce the smoking prevalence by 19% relative to the 2010 level. These projected reductions are insufficient to achieve the committed target of a 30% relative reduction in smoking by 2025. Increased efforts to control tobacco use will be essential for reducing the burden of non-communicable diseases in Thailand.


Asunto(s)
Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Política Pública , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Tailandia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
17.
Subst Abus ; 40(1): 87-94, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29513158

RESUMEN

Background: To determine the relative impact of each of the 3 state-level tobacco control policies (cigarette taxation, tobacco control spending, and smoke-free air [SFA] laws) on adult smoking rate overall and separately for adult subgroups in the United States. Methods: A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted with generalized propensity scores. State-level policies were merged with the individual-level Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 1995-2009. Results: State cigarette taxation was the only policy that significantly impacted smoking among the general adult population, with a 1-standard deviation increase in taxes (i.e., $0.68 in constant 2014 dollars) lowering the adult smoking rate by about a quarter of a percentage point. The taxation impact was consistent, regardless of the presence of, or interactions with, other policies. Taxation was also the only policy that significantly reduced smoking for some adult subgroups, including females, non-Hispanic whites, adults aged 51 or older, and adults with more than a high school education. However, other adult subgroups responded to the other 2 types of policies, either by mediating the taxation effect or by reducing smoking independently. Specifically, tobacco control spending reduced smoking among young adults (ages 18-25 years) and Hispanics. SFA laws affected smoking among men, young adults, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics. Conclusions: State cigarette taxation is the single most important policy for reducing smoking among the general adult population. However, adult subgroups' reactions to taxes are diverse and mediated by tobacco control spending and SFA laws.


Asunto(s)
Política para Fumadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/epidemiología , Impuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Productos de Tabaco/economía , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Política para Fumadores/tendencias , Fumar/tendencias , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/tendencias , Impuestos/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 67(3): 181-187, 2019 May.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30954324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prohibition of tobacco sales to minors is a provision of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on tobacco control. This measure is effective to reduce youth tobacco use, if the legislation adopted is properly implemented and enforced. Through the examples of France and Quebec, the objective of this study is to compare legislative frameworks prohibiting tobacco sales to minors, their enforcement, and possible impact on underage smoking. METHODS: Identification of legislative instruments, reports from public health authorities, and articles addressing the focused question was performed trough Medline and Google. RESULTS: Selling tobacco products to minors under 18 years of age has been banned by the law since 1998 in Quebec and 2009 in France. In 2011, in France for individuals aged 17, compliance with the law was 15%. In 2017 in France, 94% of 17-year-old daily smokers regularly bought their cigarettes in a tobacco store. Law enforcement controls and sanctions are non-existent. In 2013 in Quebec, 23% of underage smoking students usually bought their own cigarettes in a business. The compliance rate with the prohibition law rose from 37% in 2003 to 92.6% in 2017. An approach of underage "mystery shoppers" attempting to purchase tobacco products and dedicated inspectors has been implemented, and progressive sanctions are applied in case of non-compliance. In 2013, 12.2% of Quebec high school students and, in 2017, 34.1% of French 17 year olds reported using tobacco products in the last 30 days. CONCLUSION: Only an improved law enforcement, through the training of tobacco retailer's, inspections and effective deterrent penalties for non-compliance, leads to an effective legislative measure in terms of public health.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aplicación de la Ley , Menores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Niño , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Aplicación de la Ley/métodos , Legislación Médica , Menores/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Pública , Quebec/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/organización & administración , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/normas , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Industria del Tabaco/economía , Industria del Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/economía , Tabaquismo/economía , Tabaquismo/epidemiología
19.
J Cancer Educ ; 34(1): 145-153, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28889345

RESUMEN

Tobacco is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the developed world. Smoking is associated with a large number of oral pathologies, such as cancer and periodontitis. Dental professionals can play a key role in preventing these health problems. The objectives of this study were (1) to analyze tobacco consumption habits among a group of Spanish dental students, and (2) to assess their knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes regarding procedures to help patients quit smoking. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Santiago de Compostela (Galicia, Spain). Three validated questionnaires were distributed, and the obtained data was processed using SPSS. One hundred twenty out of 220 surveys were completed. Of the students, 18.3% were smokers and the average number of smoked cigarettes per day was 7.5. Tobacco dependence and the intention to give up the habit were low (Fagerström Test) and doubtful (Richmond test), respectively. The majority of students (94.2%) considered it appropriate to promote tobacco use cessation (TUC) activities. A great divergence of criteria regarding tobacco-associated pathologies was found among courses. This article provides positive data about the motivation of dental students to implement TUC strategies. Nevertheless, the usefulness of these interventions makes it necessary to modify the university curricula in order to improve the education on this issue to reduce the incidence of future health problems.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar/psicología , Estudiantes de Odontología/psicología , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Uso de Tabaco/psicología , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Tabaquismo/psicología
20.
Health Promot Pract ; 20(1): 135-145, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mass media content may play an important role in policy change. However, the empirical relationship between media advocacy efforts and tobacco control policy success has rarely been studied. We examined the extent to which newspaper content characteristics (volume, slant, frame, source, use of evidence, and degree of localization) that have been identified as important in past descriptive studies were associated with policy progression over a 2-year period in the context of point-of-sale (POS) tobacco control. METHOD: We used regression analyses to test the relationships between newspaper content and policy progression from 2012 to 2014. The dependent variable was the level of implementation of state-level POS tobacco control policies at Time 2. Independent variables were newspaper article characteristics (volume, slant, frame, source, use of evidence, and degree of localization) and were collected via content analysis of the articles. State-level policy environment contextual variables were examined as confounders. RESULTS: Positive, significant bivariate relationships exist between characteristics of news content (e.g., high overall volume, public health source present, local quote and local angle present, and pro-tobacco control slant present) and Time 2 POS score. However, in a multivariate model controlling for other factors, significant relationships did not hold. DISCUSSION: Newspaper coverage can be a marker of POS policy progression. Whether media can influence policy implementation remains an important question. Future work should continue to tease out and confirm the unique characteristics of media content that are most associated with subsequent policy progression, in order to inform media advocacy efforts.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Comunicación de Masas/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Humanos , Salud Pública , Práctica de Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Pública , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Nicotiana , Productos de Tabaco , Tabaquismo/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA