Work expectations, their fulfillment, and exhaustion among radiologists of all career levels: what can be learned from the example of Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate work expectations of radiologists at different career levels, their fulfillment, prevalence of exhaustion, and exhaustion-associated factors. METHODS: A standardized digital questionnaire was distributed internationally to radiologists of all career levels in the hospital and in ambulatory care via radiological societies and sent manually to 4500 radiologists of the largest German hospitals between December 2020 and April 2021. Statistics were based on age- and gender-adjusted regression analyses of respondents working in Germany (510 out of 594 total respondents). RESULTS: The most frequent expectations were "joy at work" (97%) and a "good working atmosphere" (97%), which were considered fulfilled by at least 78%. The expectation of a "structured residency within the regular time interval" (79%) was more frequently judged fulfilled by senior physicians (83%, odds ratio (OR) 4.31 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.95-9.52]), chief physicians (85%, 6.81 [95% CI 1.91-24.29]), and radiologists outside the hospital (88%, 7.59 [95% CI 2.40-24.03]) than by residents (68%). Exhaustion was most common among residents (physical exhaustion: 38%; emotional exhaustion: 36%), in-hospital specialists (29%; 38%), and senior physicians (30%; 29%). In contrast to paid extra hours, unpaid extra hours were associated with physical exhaustion (5-10 extra hours: OR 2.54 [95% CI 1.54-4.19]). Fewer opportunities to shape the work environment were related to a higher probability of physical (2.03 [95% CI 1.32-3.13]) and emotional (2.15 [95% CI 1.39-3.33]) exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS: While most radiologists enjoy their work, residents wish for more training structure. Ensuring payment of extra hours and employee empowerment may help preventing burnout in high-risk groups. KEY POINTS: • Most important work expectations of radiologists who work in Germany are "joy at work," a "good working atmosphere," "support for further qualification," and a "structured residency within the regular time interval," with the latter containing potential for improvement according to residents. • Physical and emotional exhaustion are common at all career levels except for chief physicians and for radiologists who work outside the hospital in ambulatory care. • Exhaustion as a major burnout criterion is associated with unpaid extra hours and reduced opportunities to shape the work environment.

An expert advantage in detecting unfamiliar visual signals in noise.

Diagnostic radiologists are experts in discriminating and classifying medical images for clinically significant anomalies. Does their perceptual expertise confer an advantage in unfamiliar visual tasks? Here, this issue was investigated by comparing the performance of 10 radiologists and 2 groups of novices on the ability to detect novel visual signals: band-limited textures in noise. Observers performed a yes/no detection task in which texture spatial frequency and external noise levels were varied. The task was performed on two consecutive days. Contrast thresholds and response bias were measured. Contrast thresholds of radiologists were superior to the control groups in all stimulus conditions on both days. Performance improved by an equivalent amount for all groups across days. Response bias differed consistently across stimulus conditions and days but not across groups. The difference in thresholds between the radiologists and control groups suggests that experience in diagnostic medical imaging produces perceptual skills that that transfer beyond the trained domain.

Strategies for Well-Being in Interventional Radiology.

Interventional radiologists (IRs) have a massive impact on their patients, communities, and healthcare at large. Yet, IRs have physical and emotional challenges that lead to a high rate of burnout compared with other medical specialties. A Medscape survey in 2013 showed a 37% burnout incidence among radiologists, which increased to 49% in 2015. This ranked radiology 7th out of 26 specialties with respect to burnout. Although the survey did not examine IR specifically, with the increasing demands on those in the profession, this number can only be expected to increase. A survey by Bundy et al demonstrated that interventional radiologists are in the upper range of burnout among physicians with 71.9% presenting with at least 1 manifestation of burnout. This is higher than that reported among surgeons or diagnostic radiologists. We must be proactive in addressing wellness in IR if we are to flourish both individually and as a group. The impact of suboptimal well-being in an IR goes beyond that of the individual, influencing patient care with ripple effects to society at large. At worst, severe burnout can lead to an early exit from medicine, with the cost of recruiting a replacement IR estimated at two to three times an annual physician salary. This is to say nothing of the experience, wisdom, and leadership that are lost when physicians burn out and drop out. Particularly in IR, where the work performed often improves the cost-effectiveness and quality of care, burnout is a threat to the physician workforce and healthcare at large. In this article, our goal is to share some elements of physician well-being and highlight opportunities to support well-being in IR.

Physician Burnout in Radiology: Perspectives From the Field.

Physician burnout is increasingly recognized as a public health crisis given the impact of burnout on physicians, their families, patients, communities, and population health. The COVID-19 pandemic has superimposed a new set of challenges for physicians to navigate, including unique challenges presented to radiologists. Radiologists from a diversity of backgrounds, practice settings, and career stages were asked for their perspectives on burnout.

Interobserver agreement between interpretations of acute changes after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for inoperable early-stage lung cancer or metastatic lung lesions. Post-SBRT, acute radiological lung changes sometimes mimic tumor progression, so over-investigation may be applied. We aimed to reveal the interobserver agreement among physicians regarding acute radiographic changes on CT of the thorax obtained shortly after SBRT MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologic images of 20 lesions treated with SBRT were evaluated for acute lung changes. Two physicians, one senior and one junior, from diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, and chest disease departments reviewed these images. The final interpretations were categorized as stable, regression/consolidation, progressive disease, and SBRT-related changes. The evaluations of the physicians were compared with the experienced reference radiation oncologist. The gold standard was accepted as the reference physician's final score. Unweighted Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficient was used for assessing interobserver agreement between physicians. RESULTS: The evaluations of the physicians were compared with the reference radiation oncologist. The strongest coherence coefficient was found with the senior radiation oncologist (κ: 0.72). The kappa coefficients between the junior radiation oncologist, junior nuclear medicine physician, and the reference physician were 0.61 and 0.55, respectively. The disciplines with the lowest kappa coefficients were junior chest disease and senior radiologist, and the kappa values were 0.37 and 0.44, respectively. CONCLUSION: Disciplines dealing with lung cancer treatment may not be aware of the various radiologic changes after SBRT or inexperienced in interpreting them from recurrence. Therefore, physicians must have detailed radiotherapy information such as planning target volume (PTV), dose/fractionation, etc. In addition, final evaluations should be performed in the multidisciplinary team dealing with the treatment of the patient.

Toward a Platform for Structured Data Acquisition in Oncology: A Pilot Study on Prostate Cancer Screening.

INTRODUCTION: Physicians spend an ever-rising amount of time to collect relevant information from highly variable medical reports and integrate them into the patient's health condition. OBJECTIVES: We compared synoptic reporting based on data elements to narrative reporting in order to evaluate its capabilities to collect and integrate clinical information. METHODS: We developed a novel system to align medical reporting to data integration requirements and tested it in prostate cancer screening. We compared expenditure of time, data quality, and user satisfaction for data acquisition, integration, and evaluation. RESULTS: In a total of 26 sessions, 2 urologists, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists conducted the diagnostic work-up for prostate cancer screening with both narrative reporting and the novel system. The novel system led to a significantly reduced time for collection and integration of patient information (91%, p < 0.001), reporting in radiology (44%, p < 0.001) and pathology (33%, p = 0.154). The system usage showed a high positive effect on evaluated data quality parameters completeness, format, understandability, as well as user satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that synoptic reporting based on data elements is effectively reducing time for collection and integration of patient information. Further research is needed to assess the system's impact for different patient journeys.

The Medical Malpractice Deposition: A Review for Radiologist-Defendants.

Depositions are critical components of any medical malpractice lawsuit and seek to help uncover the facts of the case to allow justice to be served. Depositions often create considerable anxiety for physician-defendants, including radiologists. Defendants unfamiliar with the rules of questioning or interviewing techniques used by plaintiffs' attorneys may fail to appreciate important and nuanced details of questions from the plaintiff's attorney, which in turn could impact the outcome of the case. Thorough and informed deposition preparation is thus essential. Highlighting issues relevant to radiologist-defendants, we discuss the role and structure of medical malpractice depositions as well as common scenarios, lines of questioning, and attorney strategies.

Medical app minefield: radiologists use of medical apps for education and reporting and do they require regulation?

AIM: To evaluate the use of apps in radiology and consider advised changes to practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted of all radiology consultants and specialty trainees within Devon and Cornwall. The responses were collated, including the list of all medical applications used. These were assessed using the Medicine & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) "Medical device stand-alone software including apps" guidance. RESULTS: The response rate was 88/150 (59%) radiologists who responded with the majority 48/88 (54.4%) using apps. Forty-four of 66 (67%) states that they did not assess the reliability or accuracy of these devices prior to use with 71/81 (88%) indicating that they were unaware of any regulations. Thirty-three items were identified of which 27 functioning apps were identified and three of these were considered medical devices and did not have complete and recognisable CE marking as required by the MHRA. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that application use is widespread. The vast majority of these applications are not considered medical devices; however, there are some devices that, according to the MHRA flow chart, are used in a way that classifies them as medical devices and should therefore be CE marked. This highlights the need for guidance and regulation of the medical application market with recommendations provided.

Evaluation of stress and anxiety caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in pediatric radiology.

BACKGROUND: Work-related stress and burnout were documented to be high among pediatric radiologists prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. New challenges arose from the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially introducing new stressors and anxieties. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate potential sources of stress and anxiety for pediatric radiology faculty during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey of attending physician members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology in North America from April 27, 2020, to May 22, 2020. The response rate was 21% (251/1,206). Survey questions included demographic information and questions regarding working remotely, personal protective equipment, redeployment, personal wellness, wellness resources and financial concerns. A psychometrician reviewed the questions to ensure minimal risk of misinterpretation. RESULTS: Median age of respondents was 48 years (range 33-70 years) with median number of years in practice of 14 (range 1-45 years). Fifty-three percent of respondents were women and 46% were men. Because of an increase in remote work, 69% of respondents endorsed feeling more isolated from a lack of regular interaction with colleagues. Fifty-three percent of respondents indicated that it is challenging to work remotely while overseeing home schooling for children. In comparison to men, women reported overall higher work-related stress and anxiety (P=0.02), higher feelings of guilt from radiology staff (i.e. technologists and nurses) being more exposed to COVID-19 (P=0.02) and higher levels of stress providing for dependents (P=0.04). Most respondents thought that departmental leadership was effective and respondents were not concerned about meeting financial obligations or job loss. CONCLUSION: The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic caused additional stress and anxiety for pediatric radiology faculty and disproportionally affected women. Given the continuously evolving state of the COVID-19 pandemic, these results could aid in planning and implementation of future strategies to combat burnout in radiology. Specific attention should be directed to different stressors experienced by female versus male radiologists, especially in regard to dependent care.

Radiology and patient communication: if not now, then when?

KEY POINTS: • Communication with patients in radiology is, in general, indirect using the referrer as a conduit. • Direct patient communication may be beneficial for radiology departments and radiologists to improve patient awareness about the nature of our role and also to provide correct and measured information about the nature and frequency of discrepancies in radiology.

Burnout among Interventional Radiologists.

PURPOSE: To characterize burnout, as defined by high emotional exhaustion (EE) or depersonalization (DP), among interventional radiologists using a validated assessment tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous 34-question survey was distributed to interventional radiologists. The survey consisted of demographic and practice environment questions and the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI). Interventional radiologists with high scores on EE (≥ 27) or DP (≥ 10) MBI subscales were considered to have a manifestation of career burnout. RESULTS: Beginning on January 7, 2019, 339 surveys were completed over 31 days. Of respondents, 263 (77.6%) identified as male, 75 (22.1%) identified as female, and 1 (0.3%) identified as trans-male. The respondents were interventional radiology attending physicians (298; 87.9%), fellows (20; 5.9%), and residents (21; 6.2%) practicing at academic (136; 40.1%), private (145; 42.8%), and hybrid (58; 17.1%) centers. Respondents worked < 40 hours (15; 4.4%), 40-60 hours (225; 66.4%), 60-80 hours (81; 23.9%), and > 80 hours (18; 5.3%) per week. Mean MBI scores for EE, DP, and personal achievement were 30.0 ± 13.0, 10.6 ± 6.9, and 39.6 ± 6.6. Burnout was present in 244 (71.9%) participants. Identifying as female (odds ratio 2.4; P = .009) and working > 80 hours per week (odds ratio 7.0; P = .030) were significantly associated with burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Burnout is prevalent among interventional radiologists. Identifying as female and working > 80 hours per week were strongly associated with burnout.

Notions of Preprocedural Patient Anxiety in the Realm of IR.

PURPOSE: To determine the views and current practice preferences of interventional radiologists and allied healthcare providers regarding management of preprocedural anxiety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March to April 2018, members of the Society of Interventional Radiology were surveyed regarding their opinions in the assessment and management of patient anxiety. Degree of responsibility for the management of anxiety was also queried through the use of a scale (1 = no responsibility; 2 = some responsibility; 3 = major responsibility). RESULTS: Of 1163 respondents (23.8% response rate), most described preprocedural anxiety as somewhat to very important in their practice (n = 961, 82.6%), somewhat to very important to the patients (n = 1087, 93.5%), and at least sometimes interfering with delivery of care (n = 815, 70.1%). Most respondents did not measure preprocedural anxiety directly (n = 953, 81.9%), but would address it if raised by the patient (n = 911, 82.9%). Patient education (n = 921, 79.1%), medications (n = 801, 68.8%), and therapeutic or empathetic interactions (n = 665, 56.4%) were most preferred to manage anxiety. Radiologists, nurses, patients, primary care providers, family members, and psychologists or psychiatrists were all allocated responsibility to reduce anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiologists and other providers are aware of the importance of preprocedural anxiety. Despite the notion that most radiologists did not address anxiety directly, most indicated a willingness to discuss the issue if raised by patients. Patient education, medications, and several other techniques are preferred to manage preprocedural anxiety. Responsibility to reduce anxiety is perceived to be shared among radiologists, nurses, patients, family members, and other health care providers.

Balancing Narrow and Broad Perspectives in Radiology.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to help radiologists achieve a balance between narrow and broad perspectives in their work. CONCLUSION. There are two fundamentally different perspectives from which radiologists can work: narrow and broad. Both have important roles, yet if the balance between these perspectives shifts excessively in one direction or the other, problems can arise. By understanding the respective strengths and weaknesses of each perspective, radiologists can achieve a more appropriate balance between them.

Missed Breast Cancer: Effects of Subconscious Bias and Lesion Characteristics.

Medical errors are a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality and the third leading cause of death in the United States. Errors resulting in missed breast cancer are the most common reason for medical malpractice lawsuits against all physicians. Missed breast cancers are breast malignancies that are detectable at retrospective review of a previously obtained mammogram that was prospectively reported as showing negative, benign, or probably benign findings. Investigators in prior studies have found that up to 35% of both interval cancers and screen-detected cancers could be classified as missed. As such, in conjunction with having awareness of the most common misleading appearances of breast cancer, it is important to understand the cognitive processes and unconscious biases that can impact image interpretation, thereby helping to decrease the number of missed breast cancers. The various cognitive processes that lead to unconscious bias in breast imaging, such as satisfaction of search, inattention blindness, hindsight, anchoring, premature closing, and satisfaction of reporting, are outlined in this pictorial review of missed breast cancers. In addition, strategies for reducing the rates of these missed cancers are highlighted. The most commonly missed and misinterpreted lesions, including stable lesions, benign-appearing masses, one-view findings, developing asymmetries, subtle calcifications, and architectural distortion, also are reviewed. This information will help illustrate why and how breast cancers are missed and aid in the development of appropriate minimization strategies in breast imaging. ©RSNA, 2020.

Factors Associated with Resilience Among Medical Staff in Radiology Departments During The Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence suggests that in the face of life adversity, threats, or other major stressful events, resilience is more conducive to individual adaptation and growth. MATERIAL AND METHODS The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Chinese Perceived Stress Scale were used to evaluate the resilience and perceived stress of 600 medical staff members from the radiology departments in 32 public hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze factors related to resilience. RESULTS The total resilience score was 65.76±17.26, wherein the toughness dimension score was 33.61±9.52, the strength dimension score was 21.25±5.50, and the optimism dimension score was 10.91±3.15. There was a significant negative correlation between perceived stress and resilience (r=-0.635, P<0.001). According to multivariate analysis, the total perceived stress score (ß=-1.318, P<0.001), gender (ß=-4.738, P<0.001), knowledge of COVID-19 (ß=2.884, P=0.043), knowledge of COVID-19 protective measures (ß=3.260, P=0.042), and availability of adequate protective materials (ß=-1.268, P=0.039) were independent influencing factors for resilience. CONCLUSIONS The resilience level of the medical staff in the radiology departments during the outbreak of COVID-19 was generally low, particularly regarding toughness. More attention should be paid to resilience influence factors such as high perceived stress, female gender, lack of understanding of COVID-19 and protective measures, and lack of protective materials, and targeted interventions should be undertaken to improve the resilience level of the medical staff in the radiology departments during the outbreak of COVID-19.

The continuous lure of pediatric radiology.

Pediatric radiology is an immensely rewarding career choice. Eight pediatric radiologists, enthusiastic for their profession, were asked six questions about their career choice. Their responses illustrate the common virtues of pediatric radiology and also demonstrate the diverse paths and activities that pediatric radiologists take and pursue.

The growing issue of burnout in radiology - a survey-based evaluation of driving factors and potential impacts in pediatric radiologists.

BACKGROUND: Burnout in medicine, and specifically radiology, has been receiving more attention. Little data-driven literature is available regarding risk factors/causes to ultimately help guide the development of potential solutions. OBJECTIVE: To survey pediatric radiologists, a cohort with a documented high prevalence of burnout, and to understand the impact of clinical demands on nonclinical tasks and the implications of burnout on mental health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) North America attendings was performed regarding institutional factors contributing to burnout, including call burden, clinical demands, departmental support and administrative/academic tasks. Questions regarding mental health and wellness resources were also included. Generalized linear modeling assuming binomial distribution was used for analyses with SAS 9.4. RESULTS: The response rate was 305/1,282 (24%) with 53% of respondents female. Respondents reported that both the number and complexity of clinical cases have increased since they first started practice as an attending, while the time for interpretation has not changed, P<0.0001. Using a scale of 0 (never), 1 (rarely), 2 (sometimes), 3 (frequently) and 4 (always), covering multiple hospitals (2.2) and administrative tasks (2.4) were the most stressful job factors. For those in administrative roles, the most stressful job factors were job-related tasks affected teaching duties (2.0) and decreased overall job satisfaction (2.0). Of the respondents, 52% said they know a physician affected by work stress-related mental illness and 25% know a physician who has contemplated or committed suicide. While 39% of the respondents have resources available to address burnout, only 33% utilize these resources. CONCLUSION: Increasing clinical demands and additional institutional/departmental factors play a potential role in burnout, which has serious implications for the mental health of pediatric radiologists.

[Patient satisfaction with radiologists in private practice]. / Patientenzufriedenheit beim niedergelassenen Radiologen.

BACKGROUND: Radiology is an interface discipline. The radiologist must provide answers for various diagnostic questions in a short time by means of various examinations. The patient as well as the referring physician must be adequately and appropriately considered within a reasonable period, at the same time ensuring a high quality of examination with the lowest possible radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 4-month period, a total of 102 patient interviews and 259 physician-patient interviews on patient satisfaction were randomly analyzed, specifically patient-physician communication and patient expectations and physician satisfaction and patient expectations. A psychologist carried out the questioning of the patients. Four radiologists evaluated their patient interaction using a standardized questionnaire, which was anonymized with regard to the patient data, based on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The patients displayed a high level of satisfaction with the discussion of radiologic findings. There was a positive correlation between the satisfaction with the discussion of findings and the clarity about the further steps necessary. Looking at the radiologists, there was also a positive correlation between the satisfaction with the patient interview and the fulfillment of the expectations; overall, physician's satisfaction with the interview was less positive than patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The radiologic patient is generally satisfied with the visit to the radiologist if a brief, understandable explanation of the disease is given, complemented by instructive next necessary steps.

[What does the nonradiologist expect from the radiologist?] / Was erwartet der Nichtradiologe vom Radiologen?

BACKGROUND: Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron-emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) are hybrid medical imaging techniques that are becoming increasingly important in the diagnostic workup of cancer. Correct definition and interpretation of results are key challenges for both radiologists/specialists in nuclear medicine as well as for the treating clinician. Strong interdisciplinary communication is prerequisite to solve the upcoming complexity of retrieved information generated by hybrid imaging. OBJECTIVES: Different indications for hybrid medical imaging and review of current theranostic principles from the perspective of clinicians/clinical oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GBA guidelines and recommendations retrieved from the corresponding German S3 guidelines for the use of PET imaging are summarized, followed by a review of innovative clinical trials that promote PET-based therapeutic strategies and radioligand therapies. RESULTS: Next generation PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging are being increasingly used for diagnostic purposes and follow-up staging in malignant tumors. Radioligand therapy may have the potential to be a further cornerstone in personalized antitumor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Careful implementation of hybrid medical imaging can clearly improve the quality of the diagnosis in cancer patients and even increase the quality of care for cancer patients. Close interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to optimize therapeutic strategies for each patient.

Avoiding and Managing Error in Interventional Radiology Practice: Tips and Tools.

While there are limited data on error in interventional radiology (IR), the literature so far indicates that many errors in IR are potentially preventable. Yet, understanding the sources for error and implementing effective countermeasures can be challenging. Traditional methods for reducing error such as increased vigilance and new policies may be effective but can also contribute to an "error cycle." A hierarchy of effectiveness for patient safety interventions is outlined, and the characteristics of "high-reliability" organizations in other "high-risk" industries are examined for clues that could be implemented in IR. The evidence behind team error reduction strategies such as checklists is considered along with individual approaches such as "slowing down when you should." However, error in medicine is inevitable, and this article also seeks to outline an evidence-based approach to managing the psychological impact of being involved in medical error as a physician.