In vivo characterization of anti-atrial fibrillatory potential and pharmacological safety profile of INa,L plus IKr inhibitor ranolazine using the halothane-anesthetized dogs.

To characterize in vivo anti-atrial fibrillatory potential and pharmacological safety profile of ranolazine having INa,L plus IKr inhibitory actions in comparison with those of clinically available anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs; namely, dronedarone, amiodarone, bepridil and dl-sotalol in our previous studies, ranolazine dihydrochloride in sub-therapeutic (0.3 mg/kg) and supra-therapeutic (3 mg/kg) doses was intravenously infused over 10 min to the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 5). The low dose increased the heart rate, cardiac output and atrioventricular conduction velocity possibly via vasodilator action-induced, reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Meanwhile, the high dose decreased the heart rate, ventricular contraction, cardiac output and mean blood pressure, indicating that drug-induced direct actions may exceed the reflex-mediated compensation. In addition, it prolonged the atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods, of which potency and selectivity for the former were less great compared with those of the clinically-available drugs. Moreover, it did not alter the ventricular early repolarization period in vivo, but prolonged the late repolarization with minimal risk for re-entrant arrhythmias. These in vivo findings of ranolazine suggest that INa,L suppression may attenuate IKr inhibition-associated prolongation of early repolarization in the presence of reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Thus, ranolazine alone may be less promising as an anti-atrial fibrillatory drug, but its potential risk for inducing torsade de pointes will be small. These information can be used as a guide to predict the utility and adverse effects of anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs having multi-channel modulatory action.

Confounders and Pharmacological Characterization When Using the QT, JTp, and Tpe Intervals in Beagle Dogs.

INTRODUCTION: Corrected QT (QTc) interval is an essential proarrhythmic risk biomarker, but recent data have identified limitations to its use. The J to T-peak (JTp) interval is an alternative biomarker for evaluating drug-induced proarrhythmic risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacological effects using spatial magnitude leads and DII electrocardiogram (ECG) leads and common ECG confounders (ie, stress and body temperature changes) on covariate adjusted QT (QTca), covariate adjusted JTp (JTpca), and covariate adjusted T-peak to T-end (Tpeca) intervals. METHODS: Beagle dogs were exposed to body hyper- (42 °C) or hypothermic (33 °C) conditions or were administered epinephrine to assess confounding effects on heart rate corrected QTca, JTpca, and Tpeca intervals. Dofetilide (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg), ranolazine (100, 140, 200 mg/kg), and verapamil (7, 15, 30, 43, 62.5 mg/kg) were administered to evaluate pharmacological effects. RESULTS: Covariate adjusted QT (slope -12.57 ms/°C) and JTpca (-14.79 ms/°C) were negatively correlated with body temperature but Tpeca was minimally affected. Epinephrine was associated with QTca and JTpca shortening, which could be related to undercorrection in the presence of tachycardia, while minimal effects were observed for Tpeca. There were no significant ECG change following ranolazine administration. Verapamil decreased QTca and JTpca intervals and increased Tpeca, whereas dofetilide increased QTca and JTpca intervals but had inconsistent effects on Tpeca. CONCLUSION: Results highlight potential confounders on QTc interval, but also on JTpca and Tpeca intervals in nonclinical studies. These potential confounding effects may be relevant to the interpretation of ECG data obtained from nonclinical drug safety studies with Beagle dogs.

A case of vasospastic angina. Vasospasm physiopathology: a new therapeutic role for ranolazine?

We report the case of a 40-year-old man, transferred from another hospital to our ICU because of acute coronary syndrome. Coronarography did not show coronary stenosis. Twenty-four hours monitoring EKG allowed diagnosis of Prinzmetal angina and appropriate therapy was administered. Six months after discharge due recurrence of symptoms, ranolazine was added to therapy. After one year the patient is symptoms free.

De-escalation of antianginal medications after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Frequency and relationship with health status.

BACKGROUND: Successful chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can markedly reduce angina symptom burden, but many patients often remain on multiple antianginal medications (AAMs) after the procedure. It is unclear when, or if, AAMs can be de-escalated to prevent adverse effects or limit polypharmacy. We examined the association of de-escalation of AAMs after CTO PCI with long-term health status. METHODS: In a 12-center registry of consecutive CTO PCI patients, health status was assessed at 6 months after successful CTO PCI with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Rose Dyspnea Scale. Among patients with technical CTO PCI success, we examined the association of AAM de-escalation with 6-month health status using multivariable models adjusting for revascularization completeness and predicted risk of post-PCI angina (using a validated risk model). We also examined predictors and variability of AAMs de-escalation. RESULTS: Of 669 patients with technical success of CTO PCI, AAMs were de-escalated in 276 (35.9%) patients at 1 month. Patients with AAM de-escalation reported similar angina and dyspnea rates at 6 months compared with those whose AAMs were reduced (any angina: 22.5% vs 20%, P = .43; any dyspnea: 51.8% vs 50.1%, P = .40). In a multivariable model adjusting for complete revascularization and predicted risk of post-PCI angina, de-escalation of AAMs at 1 month was not associated with an increased risk of angina, dyspnea, or worse health status at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with successful CTO PCI, de-escalation of AAMs occurred in about one-third of patients at 1 month and was not associated with worse long-term health status.

Single dose oral ranolazine pharmacokinetics in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: Ranolazine is a novel anti-angina treatment approved in the United States for chronic stable angina. Ranolazine pharmacokinetics have not been studied previously in patients who receive maintenance hemodialysis. This study describes the pharmacokinetics of ranolazine and three major metabolites (CVT-2738, CVT-2512, CVT-2514) in patients receiving thrice weekly hemodialysis. METHODS: Eight participants receiving maintenance hemodialysis completed this prospective, open-label study (study identifier NCT01435174 at Clinicaltrials.gov). Three participants received a single tablet of ranolazine 500 mg (followed by an interim analysis), and five received 2 tablets of ranolazine 500 mg. Blood samples were collected over 65 h to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics during and between hemodialysis sessions. Non-compartmental analysis was used to determine the individual pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Ranolazine off-hemodialysis elimination phase half-lives were 3.6 and 3.9 h for 500 mg and 1000 mg doses, respectively. The time to maximum concentration ranged from 2 to 18 hours and the average maximum concentration was 0.65 ± 0.27 mcg/mL and 1.18 ± 0.48 mcg/mL for ranolazine 500 mg and 1000 mg dose, respectively. The mean hemodialysis percent reduction ratio for the ranolazine 500 mg dose was 52.3 ± 8.1% and for the ranolazine 1000 mg dose was 69.2 ± 37.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Data on ranolazine dosing in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis is almost non-existent. Given the extent of pharmacokinetic variability observed with the 500 mg and 1000 mg oral doses of ranolazine, neither can be recommended as a starting dose in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Guided by the information gained form this study about the extent of hemodialytic drug clearance, further multi-dose clinical trials of ranolazine are needed to optimize therapeutic outcomes in this patient population.

Antiarrhythmic Effects of Combining Dofetilide and Ranolazine in a Model of Acutely Induced Atrial Fibrillation in Horses.

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic compounds against atrial fibrillation (AF) often have reduced efficacy and may display cardiac and/or noncardiac toxicity. Efficacy can be improved by combining 2 compounds with distinct mechanisms, and it may be possible to use lower doses of each compound, thereby reducing the likelihood of adverse side effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the effective doses of dofetilide and ranolazine can be reduced if the drugs are combined. METHODS: Dofetilide, ranolazine, and a combination of these were administered in 4 incremental dosing regimens to horses with acutely pacing-induced AF. Time to cardioversion, atrial effective refractory period, and AF vulnerability and duration were assessed. RESULTS: Of 8 horses, 6 cardioverted to sinus rhythm after infusion with a combination of 0.889 µg/kg dofetilide and 0.104 mg/kg ranolazine. Two horses cardioverted with 0.104 mg/kg ranolazine alone, and 3 cardioverted with 0.889 µg/kg dofetilide alone. The combination therapy decreased AF vulnerability (P < 0.05) and AF duration (P < 0.05). No change in atrial effective refractory period was detected with any of the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of dofetilide and ranolazine showed increased antiarrhythmic effects on acutely induced AF in horses, affecting time to cardioversion, AF vulnerability, and AF duration.

Novel Use of Ranolazine as an Antiarrhythmic Agent in Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the limitations of current antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation (AF) and discuss the rationale and clinical trials supporting the use of ranolazine in AF. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched from 1980 to September 2016 using the terms ranolazine, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery bypass grafting, and valve surgery. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language studies and reviews assessing antiarrhythmic drugs, including ranolazine, were incorporated. DATA SYNTHESIS: The use of ranolazine monotherapy has been evaluated in 2 clinical trials. In the RAFFAELLO trial, higher doses of ranolazine showed a trend toward lower AF recurrence versus placebo ( P = 0.053), but further evidence is needed to support its use as a sole therapeutic agent. Ranolazine has shown utility in a limited number of studies as an adjunctive agent, which is critical for those in whom standard therapy is inadequate or the adverse event profile precludes optimized standard therapy. In the HARMONY trial, ranolazine 750 mg and dronedarone 225 mg twice daily reduced the AF burden by 59.1% from baseline ( P = 0.008 vs placebo). In a trial by Koskinas and colleagues, patients receiving ranolazine 1500 mg once and intravenous amiodarone had a higher conversion rate than those receiving amiodarone alone ( P = 0.024). There are also promising studies for the prevention and treatment of post-cardiothoracic surgery AF, which require further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine's pharmacological properties and available evidence suggest potential for its use in AF.

Ranolazine Added to Amiodarone Facilitates Earlier Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation Compared to Amiodarone-Only Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Amiodarone (AMIO) is for many years effectively used to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF) and to convert it into sinus rhythm. However, due to its delayed onset of action, ranolazine (RAN), a new antianginal agent with atrial-selective electrophysiologic properties, has recently been attempted as add-on therapy with AMIO to facilitate AF conversion. METHODS: To establish the role of this combination therapy, we enrolled 173 consecutive patients (68 ± 10 years, 54% male) with recent-onset (<48-hour duration) AF who were eligible for pharmacologic cardioversion. Patients were randomized to intravenous AMIO (loading dose 5 mg/kg in 1 hour followed by 50 mg/h; n = 81), or AMIO plus a single oral dose of RAN 1 g (n = 92). RESULTS: Mean left atrial diameter did not significantly differ between groups, AMIO and AMIO + RAN (4.2 ± 0.5 cm vs 4.1 ± 0.4 cm, P = 0.18). The AMIO + RAN group compared with the AMIO-only group showed significantly shorter time to conversion (8.6 ± 2.8 hours vs 19.4 ± 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001) and higher conversion rate at 24 hours (98% vs 58%, P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not markedly vary between the two groups and ranged within moderately reduced values. No serious clinically evident adverse effects were observed in any of the patients receiving either AMIO or the combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate faster sinus rhythm restoration and enhanced conversion rate of AF after AMIO plus RAN in patients with preserved ejection fraction and left atrial size, implicating a synergistic effect of the two agents.

Ranolazine for stable angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND: Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of late Na current inhibition (ranolazine) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD): impact on angina and myocardial perfusion reserve.

AIMS: The mechanistic basis of the symptoms and signs of myocardial ischaemia in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. The aim of this study was to mechanistically test short-term late sodium current inhibition (ranolazine) in such subjects on angina, myocardial perfusion reserve index, and diastolic filling. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, mechanistic trial in subjects with evidence of CMD [invasive coronary reactivity testing or non-invasive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI)]. Short-term oral ranolazine 500-1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks vs. placebo. Angina measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and SAQ-7 (co-primaries), diary angina (secondary), stress MPRI, diastolic filling, quality of life (QoL). Of 128 (96% women) subjects, no treatment differences in the outcomes were observed. Peak heart rate was lower during pharmacological stress during ranolazine (-3.55 b.p.m., P < 0.001). The change in SAQ-7 directly correlated with the change in MPRI (correlation 0.25, P = 0.005). The change in MPRI predicted the change in SAQ QoL, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), prior myocardial infarction, and site (P = 0.0032). Low coronary flow reserve (CFR <2.5) subjects improved MPRI (P < 0.0137), SAQ angina frequency (P = 0.027), and SAQ-7 (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In this mechanistic trial among symptomatic subjects, no obstructive CAD, short-term late sodium current inhibition was not generally effective for SAQ angina. Angina and myocardial perfusion reserve changes were related, supporting the notion that strategies to improve ischaemia should be tested in these subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342029.

Pre- and Delayed Treatments With Ranolazine Ameliorate Ventricular Arrhythmias and Nav1.5 Downregulation in Ischemic/Reperfused Rat Hearts.

Enhanced late sodium current (late INa) and intracellular Nav1.5 redistribution contribute to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R)-induced arrhythmias. Ranolazine can reduce lethal arrhythmias by inhibiting late INa. However, little is known regarding its role in regulating the distribution of Nav1.5 during I/R. Therefore, we investigated the roles of ranolazine in post-I/R Nav1.5 expression and distribution in myocardium. Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups: sham, I/R, Ran Pre, and Ran Delay. Electrocardiogram and arterial pressure were recorded during the procedure. Nav1.5 mRNA and protein levels in peri-infarct cardiac tissue were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence. To further confirm the regulation of ranolazine on Nav1.5, GS967, another late INa inhibitor was used. Both pre- and delayed ranolazine treatments significantly reduced the incidence of severe ventricular arrhythmias, along with shortened corrected QT interval by 29.55% and QRS duration by 18.38% during I/R. The protein level of Nav1.5 decreased by 31.63% after I/R. Ranolazine and GS967 remained Nav1.5 protein expression and Nav1.5 redistribution on intercalated discs and lateral membranes, without affecting Nav1.5 mRNA level. In conclusion, upregulating Nav1.5 expression and redistribution on the intercalated discs and lateral membranes of cardiomyocytes may underlie the antiarrhythmic effects of ranolazine in I/R rats.

Ranolazine Therapy in Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Ranolazine is an antianginal medication originally granted approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for therapeutic use in 2006. Since its introduction into the U.S. market, there have been multiple trials and clinical case reports that demonstrate ranolazine may be effective in the prevention and treatment of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, including postoperative atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. More recently, the combination of dronedarone with ranolazine has demonstrated in initial studies to have a synergistic effect in the reduction of burden of atrial fibrillation. This article will review the basic pharmacology of ranolazine, the studies demonstrating use of ranolazine in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, the limitations to the use of ranolazine as antiarrhythmic therapy, and explore the synergistic effect with other agents in the suppression of arrhythmias.

[Triple antianginal combinations in the treatment of elderly and senile patients with stable angina]. / Trekhkomponentnye kombinatsii antianginal'nykh preparatov v lechenii bol'nykh pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta so stabil'noi stenokardiei napryazheniya.

AIM: To compare the efficiency and safety of antianginal therapy (AAT) using a combination of bisoprolol, ivabradine, and trimetazidine or ranolazine in elderly and senile patients with stable angina. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 107 patients aged 60 to 79 years with coronary heart disease and Functional Class II and III angina. When the patients taking bisoprolol 1.25-2.5 mg once daily and ivabradine 2.5-7.5 mg twice daily continued to have angina and/or silent myocardial ischemia, after randomization 54 patients received an additional 35 mg of trimetazidine twice a day and 53 patients had ranolazine 500 mg twice daily. A comprehensive clinical and instrumental study was conducted prior to randomization and after 6 months of triple AAT. RESULTS: The patients tolerated well both treatments that substantially improved the results of a treadmill exercise test. Trimetazidine reduced to a greater extent the duration of silent ST-segment depression, as evidenced by Holter monitoring. Trimetazidine and ranolazine comparably improved left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, large arterial structure and function, and quality of life in the patients. CONCLUSION: The combinations of the low-dose ß-blocker with ivabradine and trimetazidine or ranolazine may be used to treat refractory stable angina in elderly and senile patients. Trimetazidine is preferred due to its higher efficacy in treating silent myocardial ischemia and to its lower cost.

Glucose-Lowering Medications and Angina Burden in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease: results from the Type 2 Diabetes Evaluation of Ranolazine in Subjects With Chronic Stable Angina (TERISA) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Different classes of glucose-lowering medications have been associated with varying risks of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, but their effect on angina is unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the association of different glucose-lowering medication classes with angina frequency and nitroglycerin (NTG) use. METHODS: We performed a secondary, observational analysis of the TERISA multinational trial, which evaluated the antianginal effect of ranolazine versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, documented coronary disease, and a 3-month history of stable angina. Patients recorded angina and NTG use in a daily dairy for 3 weeks prior to randomization, to establish their baseline angina burden for the trial. We then examined the association of different glucose-lowering medication classes with baseline angina and NTG use using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Among 952 patients enrolled, 494 were taking metformin, 504 taking a sulfonylurea, 186 taking insulin, 29 taking DPP-4 inhibitors, 22 taking other glucose-lowering medications, and 68 were diet-controlled only. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, patients taking versus not taking sulfonylureas had 1.02 more episodes of angina and used 0.93 more doses of NTG per week (P = .002 and .011, respectively). The weekly angina burden or NTG use was not different for those taking versus not taking metformin (P > .7 for both). Patients taking versus not taking insulin had 0.83 more episodes of angina and used 1.40 more NTG doses per week, increases evident only in those taking insulin without concomitant metformin (Pinteraction < .05 for both). CONCLUSION: Different classes of glucose-lowering medications were associated with varying angina burden in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary disease. Patients taking sulfonylureas or insulin had more angina and used more NTG, while metformin was not associated with angina burden. Given the increasing prevalence of glucose abnormalities in patients with coronary disease, a better understanding of the relationship between glucose-lowering medications and angina is needed.

Combined actions of ivabradine and ranolazine reduce ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF) can be reduced by slowing atrioventricular (AV) node conduction and/or by decreasing dominant frequency of AF. We investigated whether combined administration of ivabradine and ranolazine reduces ventricular rate during AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ivabradine (maximum clinical dose, 0.25 mg/kg, and 0.10 mg/kg, i.v.) and ranolazine (2.4 mg/kg, i.v., bolus followed by 0.135 mg/kg/min) were studied in an anesthetized pig (N = 16) model of AF. Combined administration of 0.25 mg/kg ivabradine with ranolazine reduced ventricular rate during AF by 51.9 ± 9.7 beats/min (23%, P = 0.017) and dominant frequency of AF by 2.8 ± 0.5 Hz (32%, P = 0.005). It increased PR (P = 0.0002, P = 0.0007) and A-H intervals (P = 0.047, P = 0.002) during pacing at 130 and 180 beats/min, respectively, to a greater degree than additive effects of single agents. Combined administration of 0.1 mg/kg ivabradine with ranolazine exceeded additive effects of single agents on A-H intervals and dominant frequency of AF. Moreover, ranolazine potentiated low-dose ivabradine's reduction in ventricular rate, as combined administration more than doubled effects of the higher ivabradine dose alone and was similar to the combination with the higher dose. Neither drug nor their combination affected contractility (left ventricular [LV] dP/dt), QT or His-ventricular (H-V) intervals, or mean arterial pressure during sinus rhythm or AF. CONCLUSION: Combined administration of ivabradine and ranolazine at clinically safe levels decreases ventricular rate during AF by reducing AV node conduction and AF dominant frequency without QT prolongation or depression in contractility. Targeting these actions offers intrinsic advantages over conventional nodal agents, which can reduce contractility.

Comparison of the pharmacodynamic effects of ranolazine versus amlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with coronary artery disease treated with dual antiplatelet therapy : The ROMAN (RanOlazine vs. aMlodipine on platelet reactivity in stable patients with CAD treated with dual ANtiplatelet therapy) study.

Amlodipine, commonly used for relief of ischemic symptoms in coronary artery disease (CAD), may affect clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects. It remains unknown if ranolazine, an antianginal drug that constitutes a pharmacologic alternative to calcium channel blockade, interferes with clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects. The aim of the ROMAN study was to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of ranolazine versus amlodipine on platelet reactivity in clopidogrel treated patients with CAD. A prospective, randomized, cross-over, open-label study conducted in a total of 210 CAD patients on aspirin (100 mg/q.d.) and clopidogrel (75 mg/q.d.) 1 month following percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine (10 mg p.d., n = 105) or ranolazine (750 mg b.i.d., n = 105) for 15 days, and after a 1-week wash-out period, crossed-over treatment for 15 days. P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) were assessed at baseline and after each treatment sequence. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as a PRU > 208. Amlodipine was associated with higher PRU than ranolazine (182 ± 75 vs. 167 ± 64, p = 0.028). As compared with baseline, PRU increased significantly after treatment with amlodipine (p = 0.018), but was not different after ranolazine therapy (p = 0.871). Changes in platelet reactivity following amlodipine therapy appeared to depend on baseline HPR status, as PRU levels significantly increased only among HPR subjects. In stable CAD patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, concomitant treatment with amlodipine, but not ranolazine, interferes with clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet effects.

Effects of ranolazine on noninvasive coronary flow reserve in patients with myocardial ischemia but without obstructive coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Ranolazine reduces the Na-dependent calcium overload via inhibition of the late sodium current, improving diastolic tone and oxygen handling during myocardial ischemia. In patients with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), abnormal coronary autoregulation plays a key role. Transthoracic Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an index of coronary arterial reactivity and decreases in both microvascular dysfunction and coronary artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ranolazine on CFR in this group of patient. METHODS: Fifty-eight (39M, 19F) patients with angina and evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD, were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were assigned to ranolazine (29) or placebo (29) for 8 weeks (up to 500 mg twice a day). CFR was determined as the ratio of hyperemic, induced by intravenous dypiridamole administration, to baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity. CFR was assessed before and after 8-week therapy. RESULTS: CFR was successfully performed in all patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and CFR between ranolazine and placebo group. After 8 weeks CFR significantly increased in ranolazine group (2.54 ± 0.44 vs. 1.91 ± 0.31; P = 0.005) but not in placebo group (1.99 ± 0.32 vs. 1.94 ± 0.29; P = ns). No patient dropped out during 8 weeks therapy. Side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ranolazine is able to improve CFR in these patients. This is probably due to improvement in abnormal coronary autoregulation, both reducing baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity and increasing hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity.

Achieving Optimal Medical Therapy: Insights From the ORBITA Trial.

Background In stable coronary artery disease, medications are used for 2 purposes: cardiovascular risk reduction and symptom improvement. In clinical trials and clinical practice, medication use is often not optimal. The ORBITA (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) trial was the first placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous coronary intervention. A key component of the ORBITA trial design was the inclusion of a medical optimization phase, aimed at ensuring that all patients were treated with guideline-directed truly optimal medical therapy. In this study, we report the medical therapy that was achieved. Methods and Results After enrollment into the ORBITA trial, all 200 patients entered a 6-week period of intensive medical therapy optimization, with initiation and uptitration of risk reduction and antianginal therapy. At the prerandomization stage, the median number of antianginals established was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). A total of 195 patients (97.5%) reached the prespecified target of ≥2 antianginals; 136 (68.0%) did not stop any antianginals because of adverse effects, and the median number of antianginals stopped for adverse effects per patient was 0 (interquartile range, 0-1). Amlodipine and bisoprolol were well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 4/175 [2.3%] and 9/167 [5.4%], respectively). Ranolazine and ivabradine were also well tolerated (stopped for adverse effects in 1/20 [5.0%] and 1/18 [5.6%], respectively). Isosorbide mononitrate and nicorandil were stopped for adverse effects in 36 of 172 (20.9%) and 32 of 141 (22.7%) of patients, respectively. Statins were well tolerated and taken by 191 of 200 (95.5%) patients. Conclusions In the 12-week ORBITA trial period, medical therapy was successfully optimized and well tolerated, with few drug adverse effects leading to therapy cessation. Truly optimal medical therapy can be achieved in clinical trials, and translating this into longer-term clinical practice should be a focus of future study. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02062593.

Ranolazine in the prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation: A protocol for meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in clinical practice. This study aims to determine the ranolazine for prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation. METHOD: This study adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Protocols. Chinese electronic Database (CBM, Wanfang, and CNKI) and international electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) will be searched for all relevant published articles. We will apply no language or the year of publication restrictions. Study selection, data collection, and assessment of study bias will be conducted independently by a pair of independent reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool will be used for the risk of bias assessment. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The statistical analysis of this meta-analysis will be calculated by Review manager version 5.3. RESULTS: The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: This review will evaluate the value of ranolazine interventions for patients with AF, and provide meaningful conclusions or high-level evidence for clinical practice and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in open Science framework (OSF), (Registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/T6W9Q).