Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.415
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lab Invest ; 104(3): 100304, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092179

RESUMEN

Gene expression profiling from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal allograft biopsies is a promising approach for feasibly providing a molecular diagnosis of rejection. However, large-scale studies evaluating the performance of models using NanoString platform data to define molecular archetypes of rejection are lacking. We tested a diverse retrospective cohort of over 1400 FFPE biopsy specimens, rescored according to Banff 2019 criteria and representing 10 of 11 United Network of Organ Sharing regions, using the Banff Human Organ Transplant panel from NanoString and developed a multiclass model from the gene expression data to assign relative probabilities of 4 molecular archetypes: No Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection, T Cell-Mediated Rejection, and Mixed Rejection. Using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regularized regression with 10-fold cross-validation fitted to 1050 biopsies in the discovery cohort and technically validated on an additional 345 biopsies, our model achieved overall accuracy of 85% in the discovery cohort and 80% in the validation cohort, with ≥75% positive predictive value for each class, except for the Mixed Rejection class in the validation cohort (positive predictive value, 53%). This study represents the technical validation of the first model built from a large and diverse sample of diagnostic FFPE biopsy specimens to define and classify molecular archetypes of histologically defined diagnoses as derived from Banff Human Organ Transplant panel gene expression profiling data.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Enfermedades Renales/patología , Expresión Génica , Biopsia , Riñón/patología
2.
Am J Transplant ; 24(5): 716-723, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286355

RESUMEN

As more data become available, the Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing vascularized composite allograft (VCA) pathology is expected to evolve and develop. This report represents the Banff VCA Working Group's consensus on the first revision of the 2007 scoring system. Prior to the 2022 Banff-CanXadian Society of Transplantation Joint Meeting, 83 clinicians and/or researchers were invited to a virtual meeting to discuss whether the 2007 Banff VCA system called for a revision. Unanimously, it was determined that the vascular changes were to be included in the first revision. Subsequently, 2 international online surveys, each followed by virtual discussions, were launched. The goals were (1) to identify which changes define severe rejection, (2) to grade their importance in the evaluation of severe rejection, and (3) to identify emerging criteria to diagnose rejection. A final hybrid (in-person and virtual) discussion at the Banff/Canadian Society of Transplantation Joint Meeting finalized the terminology, the definition, a scoring system, and a reporting system of the vascular changes. This proposal represents an international consensus on this topic and establishes the first revision of the Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing vascularized composite allograft pathology.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado , Humanos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología
3.
Am J Transplant ; 24(4): 542-548, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931751

RESUMEN

The Lung Session of the 2022 16th Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology Conference-held in Banff, Alberta-focused on non-rejection lung allograft pathology and novel technologies for the detection of allograft injury. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed the state-of-the-art of current histopathologic entities, serologic studies, and molecular practices, as well as novel applications of digital pathology with artificial intelligence, gene expression analysis, and quantitative image analysis of chest computerized tomography. Current states of need as well as prospective integration of the aforementioned tools and technologies for complete assessment of allograft injury and its impact on lung transplant outcomes were discussed. Key conclusions from the discussion were: (1) recognition of limitations in current standard of care assessment of lung allograft dysfunction; (2) agreement on the need for a consensus regarding the standardized approach to the collection and assessment of pathologic data, inclusive of all lesions associated with graft outcome (eg, non-rejection pathology); and (3) optimism regarding promising novel diagnostic modalities, especially minimally invasive, which should be integrated into large, prospective multicenter studies to further evaluate their utility in clinical practice for directing personalized therapies to improve graft outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Rechazo de Injerto , Estudios Prospectivos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Trasplante Homólogo , Pulmón , Biopsia
4.
Am J Transplant ; 24(1): 89-103, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37625646

RESUMEN

The acute rejection score (A-score) in lung transplant recipients, calculated as the average of acute cellular rejection A-grades across transbronchial biopsies, summarizes the cumulative burden of rejection over time. We assessed the association between A-score and transplant outcomes in 2 geographically distinct cohorts. The primary cohort included 772 double lung transplant recipients. The analysis was repeated in 300 patients from an independent comparison cohort. Time-dependent multivariable Cox models were constructed to evaluate the association between A-score and chronic lung allograft dysfunction or graft failure. Landmark analyses were performed with A-score calculated at 6 and 12 months posttransplant. In the primary cohort, no association was found between A-score and graft outcome. However, in the comparison cohort, time-dependent A-score was associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction both as a time-dependent variable (hazard ratio, 1.51; P < .01) and when calculated at 6 months posttransplant (hazard ratio, 1.355; P = .031). The A-score can be a useful predictor of lung transplant outcomes in some settings but is not generalizable across all centers; its utility as a prognostication tool is therefore limited.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Pulmón , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología
5.
Am J Transplant ; 24(4): 549-563, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979921

RESUMEN

Kidney allograft inflammation, mostly attributed to rejection and infection, is an important cause of graft injury and loss. Standard histopathological assessment of allograft inflammation provides limited insights into biological processes and the immune landscape. Here, using imaging mass cytometry with a panel of 28 validated biomarkers, we explored the single-cell landscape of kidney allograft inflammation in 32 kidney transplant biopsies and 247 high-dimensional histopathology images of various phenotypes of allograft inflammation (antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, BK nephropathy, and chronic pyelonephritis). Using novel analytical tools, for cell segmentation, we segmented over 900 000 cells and developed a tissue-based classifier using over 3000 manually annotated kidney microstructures (glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and arteries). Using PhenoGraph, we identified 11 immune and 9 nonimmune clusters and found a high prevalence of memory T cell and macrophage-enriched immune populations across phenotypes. Additionally, we trained a machine learning classifier to identify spatial biomarkers that could discriminate between the different allograft inflammatory phenotypes. Further validation of imaging mass cytometry in larger cohorts and with more biomarkers will likely help interrogate kidney allograft inflammation in more depth than has been possible to date.


Asunto(s)
Inflamación , Riñón , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Biomarcadores , Inflamación/patología , Aloinjertos/patología , Citometría de Imagen , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología
6.
Am J Transplant ; 24(8): 1414-1426, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527588

RESUMEN

The first-generation Molecular Microscope (MMDx) system for heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies used expression of rejection-associated transcripts (RATs) to diagnose not only T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) but also acute injury. However, the ideal system should detect rejection without being influenced by injury, to permit analysis of the relationship between rejection and parenchymal injury. To achieve this, we developed a new rejection classification in an expanded cohort of 3230 biopsies: 1641 from INTERHEART (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02670408), plus 1589 service biopsies added to improve the power of the machine learning algorithms. The new system used 6 rejection classifiers instead of RATs and generated 7 rejection archetypes: No rejection, 48%; Minor, 24%; TCMR1, 2.3%; TCMR2, 2.7%; TCMR/mixed, 2.7%; early-stage ABMR, 3.9%; and fully developed ABMR, 16%. Using rejection classifiers eliminated cross-reactions with acute injury, permitting separate assessment of rejection and injury. TCMR was associated with severe-recent injury and late atrophy-fibrosis and rarely had normal parenchyma. ABMR was better tolerated, seldom producing severe injury, but in later biopsies was often associated with atrophy-fibrosis, indicating long-term risk. Graft survival and left ventricular ejection fraction were reduced not only in hearts with TCMR but also in hearts with severe-recent injury and atrophy-fibrosis, even without rejection.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Biopsia , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Miocardio/patología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Am J Transplant ; 24(3): 436-447, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38152017

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to validate the performance of Tutivia, a peripheral blood gene expression signature, in predicting early acute rejection (AR) post-kidney transplant. Recipients of living or deceased donor kidney transplants were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective, global, and observational study (NCT04727788). The main outcome was validation of the area under the curve (AUC) of Tutivia vs serum creatinine at biopsy alone, or Tutivia + serum creatinine at biopsy. Of the 151 kidney transplant recipients, the mean cohort age was 53 years old, and 64% were male. There were 71% (107/151) surveillance/protocol biopsies and 29% (44/151) for-cause biopsies, with a 31% (47/151) overall rejection rate. Tutivia (AUC 0.69 [95% CI: 0.59-0.77]) and AUC of Tutivia + creatinine at biopsy (0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.77]) were greater than the AUC of creatinine at biopsy alone (0.51.4 [95% CI: 0.43-0.60]). Applying a model cut-off of 50 (scale 0-100) generated a high- and low-risk category for AR with a negative predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), a positive predictive value of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.45-0.74), and an odds ratio of 5.74 (95% CI: 2.63-12.54). Tutivia represents a validated noninvasive approach for clinicians to accurately predict early AR, beyond the current standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Creatinina , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , ARN
8.
Am J Transplant ; 24(6): 954-966, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38097016

RESUMEN

The intricate association between histologic lesions and circulating antihuman leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in liver transplantation (LT) requires further clarification. We conducted a probabilistic, unsupervised approach in a comprehensively well-annotated LT cohort to identify clinically relevant archetypes. We evaluated 490 pairs of LT biopsies with DSA testing from 325 recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2020 across 3 French centers and an external cohort of 202 biopsies from 128 recipients. Unsupervised archetypal analysis integrated all clinico-immuno-histologic parameters of each biopsy to identify biopsy archetypes. The median time after LT was 1.17 (interquartile range, 0.38-2.38) years. We identified 7 archetypes distinguished by clinico-immuno-histologic parameters: archetype #1: severe T cell-mediated rejection (15.9%); #2: chronic rejection with ductopenia (1.8%); #3: architectural and microvascular damages (3.5%); #4: (sub)normal (55.9%); #5: mild T cell-mediated rejection (4.9%); #6: acute antibody-mediated rejection (6.5%); and #7: chronic rejection with DSA (11.4%). Cell infiltrates vary in the archetype. These archetypes were associated with distinct liver biological markers and allograft outcomes. These findings remained consistent when stratified using the patient's age or indications for LT, with good performance in the external cohort (mean highest probability assignment = 0.58, standard deviation ± 0.17). In conclusion, we have identified clinically meaningful archetypes, providing valuable insights into the intricate DSA-histology association, which may help standardize liver allograft pathology classification.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Biopsia , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Fenotipo , Donantes de Tejidos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Aloinjertos , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 33(3): 273-282, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411022

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The last year has seen considerable progress in translational research exploring the clinical utility of biopsy-based transcriptomics of kidney transplant biopsies to enhance the diagnosis of rejection. This review will summarize recent findings with a focus on different platforms, potential clinical applications, and barriers to clinical adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature has focussed on using biopsy-based transcriptomics to improve diagnosis of rejection, in particular antibody-mediated rejection. Different techniques of gene expression analysis (reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR, microarrays, probe-based techniques) have been used either on separate samples with ideally preserved RNA, or on left over tissue from routine biopsy processing. Despite remarkable consistency in overall patterns of gene expression, there is no consensus on acceptable indications, or whether biopsy-based transcriptomics adds significant value at reasonable cost to current diagnostic practice. SUMMARY: Access to biopsy-based transcriptomics will widen as regulatory approvals for platforms and gene expression models develop. Clinicians need more evidence and guidance to inform decisions on how to use precious biopsy samples for biopsy-based transcriptomics, and how to integrate results with standard histology-based diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Biopsia , Enfermedades Renales/patología , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Riñón/patología
10.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 83(4): 467-476, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37777058

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of urinary chemokines C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9) and CXCL10 for kidney transplant rejection. However, their benefit in addition to clinical information has not been demonstrated. We evaluated the diagnostic performance for detecting acute rejection of urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 when integrated with clinical information. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 1,559 biopsy-paired urinary samples from 622 kidney transplants performed between April 2013 and July 2019 at a single transplant center in Belgium. External validation was performed in 986 biopsy-paired urinary samples. TESTS COMPARED: We quantified urinary CXCL9 (uCXCL9) and CXCL10 (uCXCL10) using an automated immunoassay platform and normalized the values to urinary creatinine. Urinary chemokines were incorporated into a multivariable model with routine clinical markers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, donor-specific antibodies, and polyoma viremia) (integrated model). This model was then compared with the tissue diagnosis according to the Banff classification for acute rejection. OUTCOME: Acute rejection detected on kidney biopsy using the Banff classification. RESULTS: Chemokines integrated with routine clinical markers had high diagnostic value for detection of acute rejection (n=150) (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve 81.3% [95% CI, 77.6-85.0]). The integrated model would help avoid 59 protocol biopsies per 100 patients when the risk for rejection is predicted to be below 10%. The performance of the integrated model was similar in the external validation cohort. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional nature obviates investigating the evolution over time and prediction of future rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an integrated model of urinary chemokines and clinical markers for noninvasive monitoring of rejection could enable a reduction in the number of biopsies. Urinary chemokines may be useful noninvasive biomarkers whose use should be further studied in prospective randomized trials to clarify their role in guiding clinical care and the use of biopsies to detect rejection after kidney transplantation. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have been suggested to be good noninvasive biomarkers of kidney transplant rejection. However, defining a context of use and integration with clinical information is necessary before clinical implementation can begin. In this study, we demonstrated that urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, together with clinical information, have substantial diagnostic accuracy for the detection of acute kidney transplant rejection. Application of urinary chemokines together with clinical information may guide biopsy practices following kidney transplantation and potentially reduce the need for kidney transplant biopsies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Quimiocina CXCL10/orina , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Biomarcadores/orina
11.
Hepatology ; 77(2): 355-366, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819312

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In otherwise near-normal appearing biopsies by routine light microscopy, next-generation pathology (NGP) detected close pairings (immune pairs; iPAIRs) between lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that predicted immunosuppression weaning failure in pediatric liver transplant (LTx) recipients (Immunosuppression Withdrawal for Stable Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients [iWITH], NCT01638559). We hypothesized that NGP-detected iPAIRs enrich for true immune synapses, as determined by nuclear shape metrics, intercellular distances, and supramolecular activation complex (SMAC) formation. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Intralobular iPAIRs (CD45 high lymphocyte-major histocompatibility complex II + APC pairs; n = 1167, training set) were identified at low resolution from multiplex immunohistochemistry-stained liver biopsy slides from several multicenter LTx immunosuppression titration clinical trials (iWITH; NCT02474199 (Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) for Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Reduction (ARTEMIS); Prospective Longitudinal Study of iWITH Screen Failures Secondary to Histopathology). After excluding complex multicellular aggregates, high-resolution imaging was used to examine immune synapse formation ( n = 998). By enriching for close intranuclear lymphocyte-APC distance (mean: 0.713 µm) and lymphocyte nuclear flattening (mean ferret diameter: 2.1), SMAC formation was detected in 29% of iPAIR-engaged versus 9.5% of unpaired lymphocytes. Integration of these morphometrics enhanced NGP detection of immune synapses (ai-iSYN). Using iWITH preweaning biopsies from eligible patients ( n = 53; 18 tolerant, 35 nontolerant; testing set), ai-iSYN accurately predicted (87.3% accuracy vs. 81.4% for iPAIRs; 100% sensitivity, 75% specificity) immunosuppression weaning failure. This confirmed the presence and importance of intralobular immune synapse formation in liver allografts. Stratification of biopsy mRNA expression data by immune synapse quantity yielded the top 20 genes involved in T cell activation and immune synapse formation and stability. CONCLUSIONS: NGP-detected immune synapses (subpathological rejection) in LTx patients prior to immunosuppression reduction suggests that NGP-detected (allo)immune activity usefulness for titration of immunosuppressive therapy in various settings.


Asunto(s)
Hurones , Linfocitos T , Humanos , Animales , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Hígado , Células Presentadoras de Antígenos , Aloinjertos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico
12.
J Med Virol ; 96(3): e29538, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506230

RESUMEN

To compare prevalence of positive PCR tests for herpesviruses between patients with and without a history of clinical corneal endothelial allograft rejection (AGR). Retrospective cross-sectional study with two-group comparison. A total of 307 aqueous humor (AH) samples from 235 Patients and 244 eyes who underwent penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty or had a diagnostic AH aspiration due to clinical AGR between 2019 and 2023 were tested for DNA of herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). PCR test results were compared between the two groups (with/without AGR). Another sub-analysis examined the results of patients without a history of herpetic keratitis. A total of 8% of eyes with clinical AGR (9/108) had a positive PCR result for one of the herpesviruses (HSV:3, CMV:3, EBV:2, VZV:1). All patients in the group without AGR had negative PCR results for all previous viruses (0/136). The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The sub-analysis of eyes without a history of herpetic keratitis also revealed significantly more positive herpes PCR results (7/87) in eyes with AGR than in eyes without AGR (0/42, p = 0.005). Clinical AGR after keratoplasty shows a significant correlation to viral replication. Herpetic infection and AGR could occur simultaneously and act synergistically. Timely differentiation between active herpetic infection and/or AGR is pivotal for proper treatment and graft preservation.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Infecciones por Herpesviridae , Queratitis Herpética , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Humor Acuoso/química , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Herpesvirus Humano 4/genética , Simplexvirus/genética , Citomegalovirus/genética , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/diagnóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 3/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , ADN Viral/genética , ADN Viral/análisis
13.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 262, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are common following lung transplantation (LuTx), yet their role in graft damage is inconclusive. Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) is the main read-out of DSA diagnostics; however its value is often disregarded when analyzing unwanted post-transplant outcomes such as graft loss or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Here we aim to evaluate an MFI stratification method in these outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 87 LuTx recipients has been analyzed, in which a cutoff of 8000 MFI has been determined for high MFI based on clinically relevant data. Accordingly, recipients were divided into DSA-negative, DSA-low and DSA-high subgroups. Both graft survival and CLAD-free survival were evaluated. Among factors that may contribute to DSA development we analyzed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infection in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens. RESULTS: High MFI DSAs contributed to clinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and were associated with significantly worse graft (HR: 5.77, p < 0.0001) and CLAD-free survival (HR: 6.47, p = 0.019) compared to low or negative MFI DSA levels. Analysis of BAL specimens revealed a strong correlation between DSA status, P. aeruginosa infection and BAL neutrophilia. DSA-high status and clinical AMR were both independent prognosticators for decreased graft and CLAD-free survival in our multivariate Cox-regression models, whereas BAL neutrophilia was associated with worse graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa infection rates are elevated in recipients with a strong DSA response. Our results indicate that the simultaneous interpretation of MFI values and BAL neutrophilia is a feasible approach for risk evaluation and may help clinicians when to initiate DSA desensitization therapy, as early intervention could improve prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Pulmón , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/inmunología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Adulto , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Estudios de Cohortes , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Anciano
14.
Clin Sci (Lond) ; 138(11): 663-685, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819301

RESUMEN

There is a major unmet need for improved accuracy and precision in the assessment of transplant rejection and tissue injury. Diagnoses relying on histologic and visual assessments demonstrate significant variation between expert observers (as represented by low kappa values) and have limited ability to assess many biological processes that produce little histologic changes, for example, acute injury. Consensus rules and guidelines for histologic diagnosis are useful but may have errors. Risks of over- or under-treatment can be serious: many therapies for transplant rejection or primary diseases are expensive and carry risk for significant adverse effects. Improved diagnostic methods could alleviate healthcare costs by reducing treatment errors, increase treatment efficacy, and serve as useful endpoints for clinical trials of new agents that can improve outcomes. Molecular diagnostic assessments using microarrays combined with machine learning algorithms for interpretation have shown promise for increasing diagnostic precision via probabilistic assessments, recalibrating standard of care diagnostic methods, clarifying ambiguous cases, and identifying potentially missed cases of rejection. This review describes the development and application of the Molecular Microscope® Diagnostic System (MMDx), and discusses the history and reasoning behind many common methods, statistical practices, and computational decisions employed to ensure that MMDx scores are as accurate and precise as possible. MMDx provides insights on disease processes and highly reproducible results from a comparatively small amount of tissue and constitutes a general approach that is useful in many areas of medicine, including kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplants, with the possibility of extrapolating lessons for understanding native organ disease states.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Órganos , Humanos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Aprendizaje Automático , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 30(4): 391-397, 2024 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656281

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review what is currently known about the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of acute rejection (AR) in lung transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Epigenomic and transcriptomic methods are gaining traction as tools for earlier detection of AR, which still remains primarily a histopathologic diagnosis. SUMMARY: Acute rejection is a common cause of early posttransplant lung graft dysfunction and increases the risk of chronic rejection. Detection and diagnosis of AR is primarily based on histopathology, but noninvasive molecular methods are undergoing investigation. Two subtypes of AR exist: acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Both can have varied clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to fulminant ARDS, and can present simultaneously. Diagnosis of ACR requires transbronchial biopsy; AMR requires the additional measuring of circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels. First-line treatment in ACR is increased immunosuppression (pulse-dose or tapered dose glucocorticoids); refractory cases may need antibody-based lymphodepletion therapy. First line treatment in AMR focuses on circulating DSA removal with B and plasma cell depletion; plasmapheresis, intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIG), bortezomib, and rituximab are often employed.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Plasmaféresis , Biopsia
16.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 30(4): 377-381, 2024 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305383

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a life-threatening complication following lung transplantation. Different CLAD phenotypes have recently been defined, based on the combination of pulmonary function testing and chest computed tomography (CT) scanning and spurred renewed interests in differential diagnosis, risk factors and management of CLAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Given their crucial importance in the differential diagnosis, we will discuss the latest development in assessing the pulmonary function and chest CT scan, but also their limitations in proper CLAD phenotyping, especially with regards to patients with baseline allograft dysfunction. Since no definitive treatment exists, it remains important to timely identify clinical risk factors, but also to assess the presence of specific patterns or biomarkers in tissue or in broncho alveolar lavage in relation to CLAD (phenotypes). We will provide a comprehensive overview of the latest advances in risk factors and biomarker research in CLAD. Lastly, we will also review novel preventive and curative treatment strategies for CLAD. SUMMARY: Although this knowledge has significantly advanced the field of lung transplantation, more research is warranted because CLAD remains a life-threatening complication for all lung transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Aloinjertos , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/análisis , Enfermedad Crónica , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnóstico , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/terapia , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/fisiopatología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen
17.
J Surg Res ; 295: 28-40, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979234

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Graft loss in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is more often associated with vasculopathy and chronic rejection (CR) than acute cellular rejection (ACR). We present a rat osteomyocutaneous flap model using titrated tacrolimus administration that mimics the graft rejection patterns in our clinical hand transplant program. Comparison of outcomes in these models support a role for ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) and microvascular changes in CR of skin and large-vessel vasculopathy. The potential of the surgical models for investigating mechanisms of rejection and vasculopathy in VCA and treatment interventions is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four rodent groups were evaluated: syngeneic controls (Group 1), allogeneic transient immunosuppression (Group 2), allogeneic suboptimal immunosuppression (Group 3), and allogeneic standard immunosuppression (Group 4). Animals were monitored for ACR, vasculopathy, and CR of the skin. RESULTS: Transient immunosuppression resulted in severe ACR within 2 wk of tacrolimus discontinuation. Standard immunosuppression resulted in minimal rejection but subclinical microvascular changes, including capillary thrombosis and luminal narrowing in arterioles in the donor skin. Further reduction in tacrolimus dose led to femoral vasculopathy and CR of the skin. Surprisingly, femoral vasculopathy was also observed in the syngeneic control group. CONCLUSIONS: Titration of tacrolimus in the allogeneic VCA model resulted in presentations of rejection and vasculopathy similar to those in patients and suggests vasculopathy starts at the microvascular level. This adjustable experimental model will allow the study of variables and interventions, such as external trauma or complement blockade, that may initiate or mitigate vasculopathy and CR in VCA.


Asunto(s)
Tacrolimus , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado , Humanos , Ratas , Animales , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado/efectos adversos , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto
18.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15206, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041491

RESUMEN

Existing literature offers conflicting conclusions about whether early acute cellular rejection influences long-term outcomes in liver transplantation. We retrospectively collected donor and recipient data on all adult, first-time liver transplants performed at a single center between 2008 and 2020. We divided this population into two cohorts based on the presence of early biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (EBPR) within the first 90 days post-transplant and compared outcomes between the groups. There were 896 liver transplants that met inclusion criteria with 112 cases (12.5%) of EBPR. Recipients who developed EBPR had higher biochemical Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (28 vs. 24, p < .01), but other donor and recipient characteristics were similar. Recipients with EBPR had similar overall survival compared to patients without EBPR (p = .09) but had decreased graft survival (p < .05). EBPR was also associated with decreased time to first episode of late (> 90 days post-transplant) rejection (p < .0001) and increased vulnerability to bacterial and viral infection (p < .05). In subgroup analysis of recipients with autoimmune indications for liver transplantation, EBPR had a more pronounced association with patient death (hazard ratio [HR] 3.9, p < .05) and graft loss (HR 4.0, p < .01). EBPR after liver transplant is associated with inferior graft survival, increased susceptibility to late rejections, and increased vulnerability to infection.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Trasplante de Hígado , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Biopsia , Supervivencia de Injerto
19.
Clin Transplant ; 38(3): e15286, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes. METHODS: All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long-term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings. RESULTS: In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death-censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572-.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long-term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante Homólogo , Hígado/patología , Biopsia , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/patología
20.
Clin Transplant ; 38(3): e15281, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess outcomes in patients with and without donor specific antibodies (DSA) and to evaluate the relationship between DSA presence and graft function, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and mortality. METHODS: The study population comprises 193 consecutive long-term heart transplanted (HTx) patients who underwent DSA surveillance between 2016 and 2022. The patients were prospectively screened for CAV through serial coronary angiograms, graft function impairment through serial echocardiograms, and cardiac biomarkers. The patients were followed from the first DSA measurement until death, 5 years follow-up or right censuring on the 30th of June 2023. RESULTS: DSAs were detected in 50 patients using a cut-off at MFI ≥1000 and 45 patients using a cut-off at ≥2000 MFI. The median time since HTx was 9.0 years [3.0-14.4]. DSA positive patients had poorer graft function and higher values of NT-proBNP and troponin T, and more prevalent CAV than DSA negative patients. In total, 25 patients underwent endomyocardial biopsies due to DSA presence while another eight patients underwent endomyocardial biopsies for other reasons. Histological antibody mediated rejection (AMR) signs were seen in three biopsies. During a median follow-up of five years [4.7-5], a total of 41 patients died. Mortality rates did not differ between DSA positive and DSA negative patients (HR 1.2, 95% CI .6-2.4). DSA positive patients were more likely to experience CAV progression than DSA negative patients (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.8) CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening reveals DSA in approximately 25% of long-term HTx patients but is rarely related to histopathological AMR signs. DSA presence was associated with poorer graft function and more prevalent and progressive CAV. However, DSA positive patients had similar survival rates to DSA negative patients.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Anticuerpos , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Donantes de Tejidos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Antígenos HLA , Isoanticuerpos , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA