RESUMEN
Urban life shapes the mental health of city dwellers, and although cities provide access to health, education and economic gain, urban environments are often detrimental to mental health1,2. Increasing urbanization over the next three decades will be accompanied by a growing population of children and adolescents living in cities3. Shaping the aspects of urban life that influence youth mental health could have an enormous impact on adolescent well-being and adult trajectories4. We invited a multidisciplinary, global group of researchers, practitioners, advocates and young people to complete sequential surveys to identify and prioritize the characteristics of a mental health-friendly city for young people. Here we show a set of ranked characteristic statements, grouped by personal, interpersonal, community, organizational, policy and environmental domains of intervention. Life skills for personal development, valuing and accepting young people's ideas and choices, providing safe public space for social connection, employment and job security, centring youth input in urban planning and design, and addressing adverse social determinants were priorities by domain. We report the adversities that COVID-19 generated and link relevant actions to these data. Our findings highlight the need for intersectoral, multilevel intervention and for inclusive, equitable, participatory design of cities that support youth mental health.
Asunto(s)
Ciudades , Planificación de Ciudades , Salud Mental , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Ciudades/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/tendencias , Dinámica Poblacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinámica Poblacional/tendencias , Urbanización/tendencias , Entorno Construido/estadística & datos numéricos , Entorno Construido/tendencias , Planificación de Ciudades/métodos , Empleo , Conducta SocialRESUMEN
Mental health is an important component of public health, especially in times of crisis. However, monitoring public mental health is difficult because data are often patchy and low-frequency1-3. Here we complement established approaches by using data from helplines, which offer a real-time measure of 'revealed' distress and mental health concerns across a range of topics4-9. We collected data on 8 million calls from 19 countries, focusing on the COVID-19 crisis. Call volumes peaked six weeks after the initial outbreak, at 35% above pre-pandemic levels. The increase was driven mainly by fear (including fear of infection), loneliness and, later in the pandemic, concerns about physical health. Relationship issues, economic problems, violence and suicidal ideation, however, were less prevalent than before the pandemic. This pattern was apparent both during the first wave and during subsequent COVID-19 waves. Issues linked directly to the pandemic therefore seem to have replaced rather than exacerbated underlying anxieties. Conditional on infection rates, suicide-related calls increased when containment policies became more stringent and decreased when income support was extended. This implies that financial relief can allay the distress triggered by lockdown measures and illustrates the insights that can be gleaned from the statistical analysis of helpline data.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Conducta Adictiva , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Empleo , Miedo , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Soledad , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , ViolenciaAsunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Salud Mental , Humanos , Cambio Climático/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/tendencias , Distrés Psicológico , Investigadores , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapiaAsunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Mental , Investigadores , Humanos , África/epidemiología , África/etnología , Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/genética , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigadores/provisión & distribución , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Mental , Estrés Laboral , Investigadores , Ciencia , Estudiantes , Humanos , Habilidades de Afrontamiento , Docentes/psicología , Internacionalidad , Trastornos Mentales/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Laboral/prevención & control , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Estrés Laboral/terapia , Investigadores/educación , Investigadores/psicología , Ciencia/educación , Estudiantes/psicologíaRESUMEN
While the COVID-19 pandemic affected mental health and increased food insecurity across the general population, less is known about the virus's impact on college students. A fall 2020 survey of more than 100,000 students at 202 colleges and universities in 42 states reveals sociodemographic variation in self-reported infections, as well as associations between self-reported infection and food insecurity and mental health. We find that 7% of students self-reported a COVID-19 infection, with sizable differences by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parenting status, and student athlete status. Students who self-reported COVID-19 infections were more likely to experience food insecurity, anxiety, and depression. Implications for higher education institutions, policy makers, and students are discussed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Inseguridad Alimentaria , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Prevalencia , Factores Raciales , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Autoinforme , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estudiantes/psicologíaRESUMEN
Mental health is a complex, multidimensional concept that goes beyond clinical diagnoses, including psychological distress, life stress, and well-being. In this study, we aimed to use unsupervised clustering approaches to identify multidimensional mental health profiles that exist in the population, and their associated service-use patterns. The data source was the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health, linked to administrative health-care data; all Ontario, Canada, adult respondents were included. We used a partitioning around medoids clustering algorithm with Gower's proximity to identify groups with distinct combinations of mental health indicators and described them according to their sociodemographic and service-use characteristics. We identified 4 groups with distinct mental health profiles, including 1 group that met the clinical threshold for a depressive diagnosis, with the remaining 3 groups expressing differences in positive mental health, life stress, and self-rated mental health. The 4 groups had different age, employment, and income profiles and exhibited differential access to mental health-care services. This study represents the first step in identifying complex profiles of mental health at the population level in Ontario. Further research is required to better understand the potential causes and consequences of belonging to each of the mental health profiles identified. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Mental , Salud Mental , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Objectives. To evaluate associations between oil and gas development (OGD) and mental health using cross-sectional data from a preconception cohort study, Pregnancy Study Online. Methods. We analyzed baseline data from a prospective cohort of US and Canadian women aged 21 to 45 years who were attempting conception without fertility treatment (2013-2023). We developed residential proximity measures for active OGD during preconception, including distance from nearest site. At baseline, participants completed validated scales for perceived stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale, PSS) and depressive symptoms (Major Depression Inventory, MDI) and reported psychotropic medication use. We used log-binomial regression and restricted cubic splines to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Among 5725 participants across 37 states and provinces, residence at 2 km versus 20 to 50 km of active OGD was associated with moderate to high perceived stress (PSS ≥ 20 vs < 20: PR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.98, 1.18), moderate to severe depressive symptoms (MDI ≥ 20 vs < 20: PR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.45), and psychotropic medication use (PR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.97, 1.28). Conclusions. Among North American pregnancy planners, closer proximity to OGD was associated with adverse preconception mental health symptomatology. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(9):923-934. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307730).
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Salud Mental , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Industria del Petróleo y Gas , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
Loneliness and lack of social connection are widespread and negatively affect physical and mental health and well-being. Data are limited for persons disproportionately affected by social disconnection, especially those who do not identify as heterosexual and cisgender. Using data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 26 U.S. states, CDC examined associations of loneliness and lack of social and emotional support to mental health variables. Prevalence estimates for the mental health variables were significantly higher among adults who reported loneliness and lack of social and emotional support than among those adults who did not. The prevalence of loneliness was highest among respondents who identified as bisexual (56.7%) and transgender (range = 56.4%-63.9%). Prevalence of lack of social and emotional support was highest among those who identified as transgender female (44.8%), transgender gender nonconforming (41.4%), and those with household income below $25,000 (39.8%). Prevalences of stress, frequent mental distress, and history of depression were highest among bisexual (34.3%-54.4%) and transgender adults (36.1%-67.2%). Addressing the threat to mental health among sexual and gender minority groups should include consideration of loneliness and lack of social and emotional support. Providing access to health services that are affirming for sexual and gender minority groups and collecting data to address health inequities might help improve the delivery of culturally competent care.
Asunto(s)
Soledad , Apoyo Social , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Soledad/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Prevalencia , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Norway and Sweden had different early pandemic responses that may have impacted mental health management. The aim was to assess the impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on mental health-related care. METHODS: We used national registries in Norway and Sweden (1 January 2018-31 December 2020) to define 2 cohorts: (i) general adult population; and (ii) mental health adult population. Interrupted times series regression analyses evaluated step and slope changes compared to prepandemic levels for monthly rates of medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, lithium, opioid analgesics, psychostimulants), hospitalizations (for anxiety, bipolar, depressive/mood, eating and schizophrenia/delusional disorders) and specialist outpatient visits. RESULTS: In Norway, immediate reductions occurred in the general population for medications (-12% antidepressants to -7% hypnotics/sedatives) except for antipsychotics; and hospitalizations (-33% anxiety disorders to -17% bipolar disorders). Increasing slope change occurred for all medications except psychostimulants (+1.1%/month hypnotics/sedatives to +1.7%/month antidepressants); and hospitalization for anxiety disorders (+5.5%/month), depressive/mood disorders (+1.7%/month) and schizophrenia/delusional disorders (+2%/month). In Sweden, immediate reductions occurred for antidepressants (-7%) and opioids (-10%) and depressive/mood disorder hospitalizations (-11%) only with increasing slope change in psychostimulant prescribing of (0.9%/month). In contrast to Norway, increasing slope changes occurred in specialist outpatient visits for depressive/mood disorders, eating disorders and schizophrenia/delusional disorders (+1.5, +1.9 and +2.3%/month, respectively). Similar changes occurred in the pre-existing mental health cohorts. CONCLUSION: Differences in early COVID-19 policy response may have contributed to differences in adult mental healthcare provision in Norway and Sweden.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Adulto , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Joven , SARS-CoV-2 , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) overcome traditional barriers enabling wider access to mental health support and allowing individuals to manage their treatment. How individuals engage with DMHIs impacts the intervention effect. This review determined whether the impact of user engagement was assessed in the intervention effect in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating DMHIs targeting common mental disorders (CMDs). METHODS: This systematic review was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249503). RCTs published between 01/01/2016 and 17/09/2021 were included if evaluated DMHIs were delivered by app or website; targeted patients with a CMD without non-CMD comorbidities (e.g., diabetes); and were self-guided. Databases searched: Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; and CENTRAL. All data was double extracted. A meta-analysis compared intervention effect estimates when accounting for engagement and when engagement was ignored. RESULTS: We identified 184 articles randomising 43,529 participants. Interventions were delivered predominantly via websites (145, 78.8%) and 140 (76.1%) articles reported engagement data. All primary analyses adopted treatment policy strategies, ignoring engagement levels. Only 19 (10.3%) articles provided additional intervention effect estimates accounting for user engagement: 2 (10.5%) conducted a complier-average-causal effect (CACE) analysis (principal stratum strategy) and 17 (89.5%) used a less-preferred per-protocol (PP) population excluding individuals failing to meet engagement criteria (estimand strategies unclear). Meta-analysis for PP estimates, when accounting for user engagement, changed the standardised effect to -0.18 95% CI (-0.32, -0.04) from - 0.14 95% CI (-0.24, -0.03) and sample sizes reduced by 33% decreasing precision, whereas meta-analysis for CACE estimates were - 0.19 95% CI (-0.42, 0.03) from - 0.16 95% CI (-0.38, 0.06) with no sample size decrease and less impact on precision. DISCUSSION: Many articles report user engagement metrics but few assessed the impact on the intervention effect missing opportunities to answer important patient centred questions for how well DMHIs work for engaged users. Defining engagement in this area is complex, more research is needed to obtain ways to categorise this into groups. However, the majority that considered engagement in analysis used approaches most likely to induce bias.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Participación del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship between precarious employment (PE) and mental well-being, focusing on age-specific interactions. METHODS: Nationally representative Korean workers (N = 29,961) were surveyed between 2020 and 2021 to collect data on multidimensional PE (categorized as low, moderate, or high) and the WHO-5 well-being index. Workers' ages were classified as young (<35 years), middle-aged (35-54 years), and older (≥55 years). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The interaction between PE and age on well-being was examined by including interaction terms in the regression models. RESULTS: The prevalence of poor well-being was 25%, 29%, and 39% for low, moderate, and high precariousness, respectively, whereas it was 26%, 30%, and 39% for young, middle-aged, and older workers, respectively. In the overall sample, the OR (95% CI) of the association between PE and poor well-being was 1.24 (1.17-1.32) for moderate and 1.54 (1.43-1.65) for high precariousness, compared with low precariousness. There was a significant interaction between old age and PE on the odds of poor well-being. Compared with young workers with low PE, middle-aged workers with high PE (OR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.62-2.10) and older workers with high PE (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.83-2.40) exhibited increased odds of having poor mental well-being. CONCLUSION: PE serves as a social determinant of older workers' psychological well-being. Policy interventions are required to protect older workers' psychological well-being.
Asunto(s)
Empleo , Salud Mental , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo/psicología , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Modelos Logísticos , Anciano , Seguridad del EmpleoAsunto(s)
Salud Mental , Investigadores , Universidades , Denuncia de Irregularidades , Universidades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Denuncia de Irregularidades/ética , Denuncia de Irregularidades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Denuncia de Irregularidades/psicología , Investigadores/psicología , Humanos , Condiciones de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Estrés Laboral/prevención & control , Salud Mental/normas , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Extreme weather events in South and Southeast Asia exert profound psychosocial impacts, amplifying the prevalence of mental illness. Despite their substantial consequences, there is a dearth of research and representation in the current literature. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies published between January 1, 2000, and January 20, 2024, to examine the impact of extreme weather events on the mental health of the South and Southeast Asian population. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality appraisal checklist. The search retrieved 70 studies that met the inclusion criteria and were included in our review. Most were from India (n = 22), and most used a cross-sectional study design (n = 55). Poor mental health outcomes were associated with six types of extreme weather events: floods, storm surges, typhoons, cyclones, extreme heat, and riverbank erosion. Most studies (n = 41) reported short-term outcome measurements. Findings included outcomes with predictable symptomatology, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, general psychological distress, emotional distress and suicide. Limited studies on long-term effects showed higher mental disorders after floods and typhoons, while cyclone-exposed individuals had more short-term distress. Notably, the review identified over 50 risk factors influencing mental health outcomes, categorized into six classes: demographic, economic, health, disaster exposure, psychological, and community factors. However, the quantitative evidence linking extreme weather events to mental health was limited due to a lack of longitudinal data, lack of control groups, and the absence of objective exposure measurements. The review found some compelling evidence linking extreme weather events to adverse mental health in the South and Southeast Asia region. Future research should focus on longitudinal study design to identify the specific stressors and climatic factors influencing the relationship between climate extremes and mental health in this region.
Asunto(s)
Clima Extremo , Salud Mental , Humanos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Asia Sudoriental/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite plausible behavioral and physiological pathways, limited evidence exists on how daily temperature variability is associated with acute mental health-related episodes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore associations between daily temperature range (DTR) and mental health-related hospital visits using data of all hospital records in New York State during 1995-2014. We further examined factors that may modify these associations, including age, sex, hospital visit type and season. METHODS: Using a case-crossover design with distributed lag non-linear DTR terms (0-6 days), we estimated associations between ZIP Code-level DTR and hospital visits for mood (4.6 million hospital visits), anxiety (2.4 million), adjustment (â¼368,000), and schizophrenia disorders (â¼211,000), controlling for daily mean temperature, via conditional logistic regression models. We assessed potential heterogeneity by age, sex, hospital visit type (in-patient vs. out-patient), and season (summer, winter, and transition seasons). RESULTS: For all included outcomes, we observed positive associations from period minimum DTR (0.1 °C) until 25th percentile (5.2 °C) and between mean DTR (7.7 °C) and 90th percentile (12.2 °C), beyond which we observed negative associations. For mood disorders, an increase in DTR from 0.1 °C to 12.2 °C was associated with a cumulative 16.0% increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.8, 19.2%) in hospital visit rates. This increase was highest during transition seasons (32.5%; 95%CI: 26.4, 39.0%) compared with summer (10.7%; 95%CI: 4.8, 16.8%) and winter (-1.6%; 95%CI: -7.6, 4.7%). For adjustment and schizophrenia disorders, the strongest associations were seen among the youngest group (0-24 years) with almost no association in the oldest group (65+ years). We observed no evidence for modification by sex and hospital visit type. DISCUSSION: Daily temperature variability was positively associated with mental health-related hospital visits within specific DTR ranges in New York State, after controlling for daily mean temperature. Given uncertainty on how climate change modifies temperature variability, additional research is crucial to comprehend the implications of these findings, particularly under different scenarios of future temperature variability.
Asunto(s)
Temperatura , New York , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Estaciones del Año , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Cruzados , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Niño , PreescolarRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We examined the associations among disease-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and sense of coherence (SOC) in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: This cross-sectional survey involved patients and physicians at 23 hospitals specializing in UC treatment in Japan (December 2019-December 2020). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed using scores on the Mental Health and General Health subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey as outcomes and SOC as the main independent variable. Scores on the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) were used to measure the effect of disease-related symptoms. The moderating effect of symptoms on the association between HRQOL and SOC was also tested. RESULTS: SOC was positively and independently associated with HRQOL (Mental Health: ß = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001; General Health: ß = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.23-0.59, p < 0.001). The association of SOC with Mental Health scores did not differ by symptoms, whereas its association with General Health was attenuated by symptoms (interaction term of IBDQ by SOC: ß = -0.0082, 95% CI = -0.017 to 0.00064, p = 0.07; that of FIQL by SOC: ß = -0.0052, 95% CI = -0.011 to 0.0010, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: SOC affected mental health independently, and its protective association with general health perception was affected by symptoms. Further research is required to determine the most effective use of SOC in interventions to improve HRQOL in patients with UC.