Intense pulsed light treatment for the management of meibomian gland dysfunction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common disorders encountered by ophthalmologists, and its management can prove challenging for both clinicians and patients. Intense pulsed light (IPL), which has been historically used in the field of dermatology, has emerged as a tool to help improve meibomian gland function. The goal of this review is to assess the clinical efficacy, utility, and safety of IPL for the treatment of MGD. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent randomized controlled trials, IPL has been shown to improve meibomian gland function, and subsequently tear film quality and dry eye symptoms. The mechanism of action still remains unclear. Recent literature suggests that IPL may also be used in conjunction with other therapies, such as meibomian gland expression, low-level light therapy, and thermal pulsation. Careful attention should be placed on each patient's Fitzpatrick skin type, as well as protecting the ocular structures to reduce the risk of adverse effects. Cost, accessibility, as well as a limited duration of efficacy may be drawbacks. SUMMARY: There is significant evidence supporting that IPL may be used as a potential well tolerated and effective treatment for MGD, though there are certain caveats regarding its long-term efficacy, accessibility, and cost.

Revisiting Unaddressed Safety Concerns Regarding Intense Pulsed Light Treatment: Past and Present Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The light spectrum of intense pulsed light (IPL) comprises visible to near-infrared light. It has been widely employed in the field of aesthetics for approximately 30 years. However, several studies have demonstrated the appearance of various undesirable biomarkers on the skin after IPL irradiation, which remain elucidated. METHODS: We reviewed the evolving concepts and explored the potentially harmful effects of IPL that may have been neglected in the past. RESULTS: Increased levels of reactive oxidative stress, p53, p16, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and cleaved caspase 3 and decreased albumin levels in human or mouse skin have been observed after IPL treatment. Visible and infrared light can exert harmful and beneficial effects on human skin. CONCLUSION: If perform improperly, IPL treatment may lead to cellular senescence, photoaging, photocarcinogenesis, thermal aging, and inflammaging. Further studies are required to verify the significance of the changes in the relevant biomarkers. The selection of treatment candidates, optimal parameters, and standardized protocols for IPL therapy are necessary.

Comparing Energy-Based Devices for Striae Improvement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Striae distensae (SD) are cutaneous lesions that are caused by hormones or mechanical stress leading to rapid expansion of skin. Therefore, SD are now a cosmetic concern. However, improving SD is notoriously difficult. Among different treatments, energy-based devices (EBDs) are much more effective and controllable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to determine the most effective type of EBD for improving the appearance of striae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The population comprised patients suffering from striae. Different types of EBDs used to improve striae were compared. The primary outcome of the reduction in the width of striae was evaluated. A random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that after a comparison among the 4 types of EBDs, no significant differences were observed in the reduction of striae width. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency, ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, and intense pulsed light are all effective treatments for reducing the striae width. None of them was superior to the others. However, radiofrequency and ablative lasers may have the highest chance of improving the appearance of striae.

Review of laser and energy-based devices to treat rosacea in skin of color.

The prevalence of rosacea in skin of color (SOC) populations is estimated to be as high as 10% in some countries. Traditionally, intense pulsed light (IPL) and pulsed dye laser (PDL) have been the laser and energy-based devices (EBDs) used to treat rosacea. However, not all laser and EBDs are safe for SOC (Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI) due to increased absorption of energy in pigmented skin and increased risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and scarring. This review summarizes the use of the top seven laser and EBDs for treating rosacea in SOC.

Efficacy of Black Gold, Delicate Pulse Light, Super Photon Skin Rejuvenation for Pigmented Dermatoses.

Context: Pigmented dermatoses are skin diseases characterized by pigmentation changes in the skin's surface due to abnormal melanocyte production. Photon-skin-rejuvenation technology can be effective for the management of facial pigmented dermatoses. Black Gold Delicate Pulse Light (DPL) Super Photon Skin Rejuvenation therapy is a new technology based on traditional photo rejuvenation. Objective: The study intended to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of DPL therapy in the management of targeted pigmented skin diseases, such as melasma, solar lentigines, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. Design: The research team conducted a prospective cohort study. Setting: The study took place at Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China. Participants: Participants were 130 patients with facial pigmented dermatoses treated at the hospital between February 2021 and December 2021. Interventions: The research team assigned participants to one of two groups, with 65 participants in each group: (1) the control group, the intense pulsed light (IPL) group, who received IPL treatment, and (2) the intervention group, the DPL group, who received black gold DPL super photon skin rejuvenation. Both groups received the treatments once a month for 6 months. Outcome Measures: At baseline and postintervention for both groups, the research team: (1) collected 5 ml of fasting venous blood from participants and measured serum concentrations of melatonin (MEL), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (2) assessed the degree of reduction of facial pigmentation using the Visia skin test and each participant's clinical results and calculated total efficacy; and (3) monitored and recorded adverse events. Results: Compared to the IPL group, the DPL group: (1) had greater symptom mitigation of the facial pigmented dermatosis, as evinced by significantly lower serum MEL (P = .001) and ET-1 (P = .020) concentrations and higher VEGF levels (P = .001); (2) for participants with freckles (P = .045), cafe-au-lait spots (P = .021), or post-acne hyperpigmentation (P = .029), had a significantly higher total efficacy; and (3) had a lower incidence of adverse events (P = .041). Conclusions: Black Gold DPL Super Photon Skin Rejuvenation offers a significantly higher safety profile and treatment efficacy for pigmented-skin diseases compared to IPL treatment. These promising results suggest potential for its use in clinical practice, but clinical adoption requires future trials.

A Review of Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Ocular Rosacea.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular rosacea is an underdiagnosed form of rosacea that may occur with or without typical cutaneous signs of rosacea. One of the common manifestations is dry eyes. Although the use of intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of rosacea-related dry eyes has been reported, a recent review is lacking. METHODS: A scoping review was performed to summarize the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of ocular rosacea. RESULTS: Five articles were included, representing 108 patients, with a mean age of 58.4 years. Based on available data, 59.2% (n = 58/98) were female. The studies detailed the use of IPL in combination with meibomian gland expression treatment. Overall, 91% (n = 89/98) of patients with ocular rosacea treated with IPL had a partial response and 9% (n = 9/98) had no response. IPL therapy did not lead to complete recovery in any of the included patients. One participant experienced an adverse event across the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: IPL is a promising treatment modality for ocular rosacea, as demonstrated by its ability to relieve dry eye symptoms with limited adverse events. Further research into this novel treatment is necessary to ascertain its role in the management of ocular rosacea.

Intense pulsed light therapy for ocular surface diseases.

Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-laser, high-intensity light source that has been shown to play a valuable role in dermatology and has been adopted in ophthalmology for treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In this review, we discuss the mechanism of action of IPL, including its benefits in ophthalmology. IPL therapy has been shown to improve tear film stability, meibomian gland (MG) function, and subjective symptoms of ocular dryness in MGD patients. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that IPL therapy is beneficial for other ocular surface diseases, such as blepharitis and chalazia. Hence, it can be inferred that IPL has potential as a therapeutic modality in future applications. Large clinical and experimental trials are needed to exploit the full potential of IPL as a treatment for recurrent chalazia, Sjögren's syndrome, and other causes of dry eye disease (DED). This paper reviews the published literature related to the application of IPL for treating ocular surface diseases.

Efficacy and safety comparison between pulsed dye laser and intense pulsed light configured with different wavelength bands in treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.

Previous clinical studies have shown that pulsed dye laser (PDL) and intense pulsed light (IPL) are effective for treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea(ETR). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL at three different wavelength bands (broad-band, single-narrow-band, and dual-narrow-band) in treating ETR. Sixty subjects with ETR were randomly categorized into four groups and received one of the following laser treatments: PDL (595 nm), IPL with Delicate Pulse Light (DPL, 500-600 nm), IPL with M22 590 (590-1200 nm), or IPL with M22 vascular filter (530-650 nm and 900-1200 nm). Four treatment sessions were administered at 4-week intervals, with one follow-up session 4 weeks after the final treatment. The efficacy of the four lasers was evaluated by comparing the clinical symptom score, total effective rate, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score before and after treatment. The safety was evaluated by comparing adverse reactions such as pain, purpura, erythematous edema, and blister. All 60 subjects completed the study. Within-group effects showed that the clinical symptom score, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score of all four groups were significantly reduced compared to before treatment (p < 0.001). Between-group effects showed no statistically significant difference among the four laser groups. Safety analysis showed that all four lasers were safe, but the incidence of blister was higher in the M22 vascular group. Nonpurpurogenic PDL, DPL, M22 590, and M22 vascular were equally effective in treating ETR and were well-tolerated. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05360251.

Effects of combined intense pulsed light and cyclosporine 0.05% eyedrops in ocular surface matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels in patients with moderate-to-severe MGD.

To investigate the changes in meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in patients with moderate-to-severe MGD after combined treatment with intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and cyclosporine 0.05%. Thirty-six patients concurrently treated with IPL and cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic drops were retrospectively enrolled. Tear break up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining scores, Schirmer test, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire responses were recorded. Meibum quality, consistency, and eyelid margin telangiectasia were evaluated. MMP-9 levels were examined by the positivity and signal intensity of red lines (scored 0-4). IPL was performed four times with a vascular filter at 2-week intervals, followed by a 1-month follow-up after treatment cessation. Immediately after each IPL treatment, gentle meibomian gland expression was performed in both the upper and lower eyelids using meibomian gland expressor forceps. TBUT (1.88 ± 1.02 s to 3.12 ± 1.08 s, p < 0.001), corneal and conjunctival staining (6.19 ± 2.11 to 3.12 ± 1.89, p < 0.001), Oxford staining grade (2.66 ± 0.89 to 1.35 ± 0.76, p < 0.001), and OSDI (52.97 ± 21.86 to 36.36 ± 22.45, p < 0.001) scores significantly improved after the combined treatment. Meibum quality, consistency and lid margin telangiectasia showed significant post-treatment improvement in both the upper and lower eyelids. MMP-9 positivity showed a significant decrease (97-69%, p = 0.026) with a reduction in signal intensity (2.72 ± 0.87 to 2.09 ± 0.95, p = 0.011). The combination of IPL therapy and 0.05% cyclosporine eye drops effectively treats moderate-to-severe MGD by reducing symptoms and signs of MGD and by decreasing ocular surface MMP-9-associated inflammation.

Safety and Effectiveness of Laser or Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Early Surgical Scar: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of laser or intense pulsed light therapy for early treatment of surgical scar. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Database, and VTTMS between January 2006 and January 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used to extract literature data. The risk of bias was assessed by RevMan. Safety was assessed based on the presence of serious adverse reactions (blisters, infections, burns above the second degree), while effectiveness was assessed using the Vancouver Score Scale. RESULTS: 1512 related articles were preliminarily retrieved, including 1211 English articles and 301 Chinese articles. According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 12 articles were selected for this analysis. In total, 475 patients were included (laser group, 238; control group, 236). All studies confirmed that the laser group was superior to the control group. In the subgroup analysis of 7 articles, the standardized mean difference was 1.99 (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that laser or intense pulsed light therapy is a safe and effective approach for early surgical scar treatment, resulting in improved scar appearance and minimal adverse reactions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Changes of Facial Lipidomics by Intense Pulsed Light Treatment Based on LC-MS.

BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been widely used to improve cutaneous photoaging in recent years. Several studies began to explore the changes of skin barrier function after treatment, but the changes of skin surface lipids (SSL), especially specific lipid content and types are still unclear. METHODS: A total of 25 female volunteers were included in our study, and each of them received three full-face treatments with one month apart. Before the first treatment and 1 month after the last treatment, we collected clinical photos and skin stratum corneum samples from individuals. A 5-level scale was used to evaluate the efficacy of IPL treatment, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discrimination Analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to analyze the changes of SSL. RESULTS: Two patients got no improvement after treatment, 6 patients had poor improvement and mild improvement was achieved in 9 patients, 5 and 3 patients reported moderate and significant improvement. The overall "effective" rate was 68 % and the "significant effective" rate was 32 %. The results showed 18 lipid subclasses and 487 lipid molecules were identified. The change of total lipid volume was not statistically significant (P = 0.088>0.05), but lipid subclass analysis showed the amount of Triglyceride (TG), Phosphatidic Acid (PA), Phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and Lysophosphatidylglycerol (LPG) were significantly increased (P < 0.05). There were 55 kinds of lipid molecules with significant difference after treatment (P < 0.05), and 51 of them belong to TG. The analysis of chain saturation of TG showed that the quantity of TG with 0, 1 and 2 unsaturated bonds increased significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IPL treatment does not have a significant effect on the overall amount of lipids while the amount of TG, PA, PG, LPG were significantly increased. These lipid changes may potentially improve the skin barrier function, but more high-quality and comprehensive studies are still needed. BULLET POINT: Lipidomics analysis based on LC-MS; Changes of skin surface lipid after IPL treatment; the relationships between skin surface lipid and skin barrier functions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The efficacy of combined Intense pulsed light plus high-intensity focussed ultrasound with two different powers in the treatment of atrophic and Icepick acne scars.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical efficacy and suitable power of high-intensity focussed ultrasound combined with intense pulsed light to treat acne scarring. METHODS: The prospective study was conducted at the College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq, from September 2020 to March 2021, and comprised patients of either gender with atrophic or icepick scars. They were divided into atrophic scar group A and icepick scar group B. Both groups were first treated with intense pulsed light and then with high-intensity focussed ultrasound using 30J/cm2 and 40J/cm2 power. There were overall 4 sessions with an interval of 4 weeks. The outcome was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS 25. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients with a mean age of 20.86±3.22 years, there were 11patients in group A; 7(70%) females and 4(30%) males with a mean age of 20.5±2.06 years. There were 11patients in group B; 7(70%) males and 4(30%) females with a mean age of 21.27±4.19 years. There was a significant difference between baseline and postintervention scores for both groups (p<0.05), and power 30J/cm2 was significantly better compared to 40J/cm2 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The developing technique using high-intensity focussed ultrasound and intense pulsed light was found to be effective in treating scars with 30J/cm2 power.

A Comparative study between the efficacy of combined Intense Pulsed Light plus high-intensity focussed ultrasound in the treatment of atrophic and icepick scars.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of high-intensity focussed ultrasound with intense pulsed light in the treatment of atrophic and icepick acne scars. METHODS: The interventional study was conducted between November 2021 and April 2022 at the Postgraduate Medical Physics Laboratory, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised patients with atrophic scars in group A and acne scars in group B. They were treated first with intense pulsed light and then with high-intensity focussed ultrasound. All patients received 4 treatment sessions spread over 4 weeks. Outcome assessment was done using Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS software version 24. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients, 12(55%) were males with mean age 20.75±4.20 years, and 10(45%) were females with mean age 21±2.05 years. The combination technique showed significant outcomes compared to baseline (p<0.05). Atrophic scars exhibited significantly greater improvement compared to icepick scars (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the overall opinion of the observer (p=0.3549) and the patients (p=0.0956). CONCLUSIONS: The high-intensity focussed ultrasound and intense pulsed light techniques used in combination was found to be effective in treating atrophic and icepick scars.

Hyperspectral assessment of acne skin exposed to intense pulsed light (IPL) intense pulsed light in acne treatment.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of intense pulsed light action on the skin is based on selective photothermolysis. The light delivered to the tissue is scattered and absorbed by chromophores that absorb a beam of radiation of a specific length. The skin reflectance changes depending on the physiological state of the tissue, as shown by the hyperspectral camera. The aim of the study was to assess the hyperspectral reflectance of acne skin before and after intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy and to compare it with the reflectance of healthy skin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 27 volunteers with diagnosed moderate acne. The control group consisted of 20 people without acne lesions. All acne volunteers underwent a series of four treatments using IPL at weekly intervals. The volunteers with acne lesions were photographed before the series of treatments and a week after the 4th treatment. RESULTS: Acne skin shows lower reflectance than healthy skin. Acne skin after IPL therapy is characterized by a higher reflectance compared to acne skin before the therapy and resembles the reflectance of the skin of the control group. A statistically significant difference was found between the acne skin before the treatments and the skin of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of IPL therapy on acne skin is the increase of its reflectance by reducing the number of chromophores, which brings it closer to the reflectance value of healthy skin. Hyperspectral imaging allows for: the evaluation of the treated skin at each stage, a precise selection of the light wavelength depending on the problem, and therefore, for optimizing the number of irradiations and increasing the safety of the therapy.

Assessment of adverse events for a home-use intense pulsed light hair removal device using postmarketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal devices are convenient for consumers. Consumer safety associated with home-use IPL devices, however, remains a subject of interest. In this descriptive analysis, we assessed the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) for a home-use IPL device from postmarketing surveillance and qualitatively compared these with AEs from clinical studies and medical device reports of home-use IPL treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this analysis of voluntary reports, we queried a distributor's postmarketing database for IPL devices for the period beginning January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. All sources of comments, for example, phone, e-mail, company-sponsored web sites, were included in the analysis. AE data were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Also, we conducted a PubMed search to identify AE profiles from existing literature on home-use IPL devices and we searched the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for reports on home-use IPL devices. These results were qualitatively compared to the data in the postmarketing surveillance database. RESULTS: A total of 1692 cases involving IPL were identified from voluntary reports of AEs between 2016 and 2021. The shipment-adjusted reporting rate for AE cases (number of AE cases/100,000 shipped IPL devices) was 67/100,000 during this 6-year period. The most commonly reported AEs were pain of skin 27.8% (470/1692), "thermal burn" 18.7% (316/1692), and erythema 16.0% (271/1692). Among the top 25 AEs reported, no unexpected health events were observed. The reported AEs were qualitatively similar to the pattern seen in clinical studies and the MAUDE database associated with such home-use IPL treatments. CONCLUSION: This is the first such report documenting AEs for home-use IPL hair removal from a postmarketing surveillance program. These data are supportive of the safety of such home-use low-fluence IPL technology.

Narrow-Band Intense Pulsed Light as Treatment for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea can be successfully treated using various laser and light-based devices. However, the use of narrow-band intense pulsed light for the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea has not been investigated in detail. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of narrow-band intense pulsed light (500-600 nm) for the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea among Chinese individuals.  Methods: Patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea who had completed 3 sessions of treatment with narrow-band intense pulsed light and follow-up from July 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical improvement was assessed by 2 blinded dermatologists based on photographs obtained at each follow-up visit using the clinician erythema assessment scale and 5-grade scale. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea treated with narrow-band intense pulsed light were included in this study. The effectiveness and excellent rates after 3 treatment sessions were 68.9% and 35.6%, respectively. An average of 2 treatment sessions was required among patients who achieved good or excellent clearance of erythema and telangiectasia. Except for transient erythema and edema, no severe adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow-band intense pulsed light is a safe and effective treatment for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Even with a small number of treatment sessions, narrow-band intense pulsed light can deliver a significant therapeutic effect, which may be applicable in clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):1095-1098     doi:10.36849/JDD.4920.

[Ocular complications in intense pulsed light therapy (case study)]. / Glaznye oslozhneniya intensivnoi fototerapii (klinicheskoe nablyudenie).

A 24-year-old female patient with photophobia, discoria, redness and dryness in her right eye after intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy applied for posttraumatic subcutaneous hemorrhage received a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography of the anterior eye segment. Her best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Medically induced mydriasis revealed discoria with paresis of pupil dilatator in the left eye (pupil size 4.2 mm and 6.6 mm in the right and left eye, respectively). Anterior segment OCT showed anterior chamber cytosis and increased iris vascularity. The patient was prescribed topical 1.0% tropicamide 2 times per day and 1.0% dexamethasone 4 times per day for two weeks. Examination performed after 3 months showed no restoration of pupil dilatator function in the left eye. The case demonstrates potential ocular complications of IPL therapy, which may include iris burn with iritis and persistent pupil dilatator dysfunction.

Will repeated Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) treatment sessions affect facial skin sensitivity? Results of a twelve-Month, prospective, randomized split-face study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of intense pulsed light (IPL) technology in cosmetic dermatology, the effects of its repeated use on facial skin sensitivity in healthy individuals remains unknown. METHODS: Seventeen healthy female volunteers were included in the study. We measured objective biophysical parameters of the skin, including transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin glossiness, thickness and density of the epidermis and dermis, sensory nerve current perception threshold (CPT), and regional blood flow before and after treatment at different time points. RESULTS: Sixteen volunteers completed a follow-up of 12 months. The treated side of the face showed a decreased TEWL on D1 and D3, which reverted to normal on D7. Epidermal thickness increased and skin glossiness decreased on the treated side on D1, but returned to normal on D3. We found no statistically significant differences in CPT values or in regional blood flow volume and velocity, with the exception of D1, which exhibited a higher regional blood flow volume on the treated side. CONCLUSION: Repeated IPL treatments had no effects on facial skin barrier function, skin nerve sensitivity, or local microcirculation among healthy individuals. IPL is a safe skin care procedure that does not affect skin sensitivity.

Outcomes of serial sessions of Activa mask combined with intense pulsed light therapy in patients with Meibomian gland dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects on ocular surface signs and symptoms of serial sessions of heating and vibrating eye mask followed by intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of dry eye disease owing to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: Consecutive patients with MGD whose signs and symptoms were not satisfactorily controlled with conventional therapy were included. Patients received 3 treatments performed at day 1, 15, and 45 incorporating a session with a newly-developed eye mask (Activa, SBS Sistemi, Turin, Italy) immediately followed by IPL therapy (E > Eye device, E-Swin, Paris, France). Patients were examined before the first session (T0) and 30 days after the last session (T1) for the measurement of: noninvasive break-up time (NIBUT); lipid layer thickness (LLT); tear meniscus height (TMH); meibomian gland loss (MGL); tear osmolarity. Ocular discomfort symptoms were ascertained by ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty patients were ultimately included in the study. At T1, all objective ocular surface parameters improved significantly, except for TMH: NIBUT and LLT increased from 6.4 ± 1.7 to 8.6 ± 1.7 s and from 57.7 ± 15.5 to 81.3 ± 12.0 µm (all P < 0.001), while MGL and tear osmolarity decreased from 21.1 ± 17.3 to 17.0 ± 14.1% and from 302.0 ± 8.5 to 295.7 ± 6.9 mOsm/L (respectively, P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). In parallel, OSDI score decreased significantly from 49.8 ± 13.5 to 29.8 ± 10.6 (P < 0.001). In the historical control group of patients who underwent only IPL, NIBUT, LLT, tear osmolarity and OSDI improved significantly but not MGL and TMH. CONCLUSIONS: Serial sessions incorporating the application of an eye mask producing heating and vibration immediately followed by IPL therapy are able to improve all ocular surface parameters as well as ocular discomfort symptoms in MGD patients.

The Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light as a Treatment for Benign Pigmented Lesions on the Dorsal Hand.

BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a noninvasive therapeutic option to treat benign pigmented lesions by targeting melanin. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess IPL as a treatment for benign pigmented dorsal hand lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of fifteen subjects, 40 to 73 years old, received 3 monthly IPL treatments over the dorsal hands. Subjects followed up 1 and 3 months after treatment. At every visit, photographs were taken using the VISIA Complexion Analysis System (Canfield Scientific, Fairfield, NJ) and analyzed using the RBX Brown Spots Analysis algorithm. The Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale and Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale were completed at both follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of fifteen subjects completed all six visits. The number of brown spots decreased 9.26% ( p = .0004) and 7.52% ( p = .0132) at each follow-up visit. The mean brown intensity decreased 6.15% ( p = .0183) and 7.67% ( p = .0178), whereas the mean contrast intensity decreased 8.88% ( p < .0001) and 6.60% ( p = .0007) 1 and 3 months after treatment, respectively. The mean Clinician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale was 2.03 and 2.23, whereas the mean Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale 1 and 3 months after treatment was 1.6 and 1.8, respectively. CONCLUSION: Objective analysis, along with clinician and subject assessments, showed an improvement in the appearance of benign pigmented lesions in the treated area after 3 IPL treatments.