Hand Posturing Is a Nonverbal Indicator of Catastrophic Thinking for Finger, Hand, or Wrist Injury.

BACKGROUND: Prior research documents that greater psychologic distress (anxiety/depression) and less effective coping strategies (catastrophic thinking, kinesophobia) are associated with greater pain intensity and greater limitations. Recognition and acknowledgment of verbal and nonverbal indicators of psychologic factors might raise opportunities for improved psychologic health. There is evidence that specific patient words and phrases indicate greater catastrophic thinking. This study tested proposed nonverbal indicators (such as flexion of the wrist during attempted finger flexion or extension of uninjured fingers as the stiff and painful finger is flexed) for their association with catastrophic thinking. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with specific protective hand postures during physical examination have greater pain interference (limitation of activity in response to nociception), limitations, symptoms of depression, catastrophic thinking (protectiveness, preparation for the worst), and kinesophobia (fear of movement)? (2) Do greater numbers of protective hand postures correlate with worse scores on these measures? METHODS: Between October 2014 and September 2016, 156 adult patients with stiff or painful fingers within 2 months after sustaining a finger, hand, or wrist injury were invited to participate in this study. Six patients chose not to participate as a result of time constraints and one patient was excluded as a result of inconsistent scoring of a possible hand posture, leaving 149 patients for analysis. We asked all patients to complete a set of questionnaires and a sociodemographic survey. We used Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression, Upper Extremity Physical Function, and Pain Interference computer adaptive test (CAT) questionnaires. We used the Abbreviated Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-4) to measure catastrophic thinking in response to nociception. Finally, we used the Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK) to assess fear of movement. The occurrence of protective hand postures during the physical examination was noted by both the physician and researcher. For uncertainty or disagreement, a video of the physical examination was recorded and a group decision was made. RESULTS: Patients with one or more protective hand postures did not score higher on the PROMIS Pain Interference CAT (hand posture: 59 [56-64]; no posture: 59 [54-63]; difference of medians: 0; p = 0.273), Physical Function CAT (32 ± 8 versus 34 ± 8; mean difference: 2 [confidence interval {CI}, -0.5 to 5]; p = 0.107), nor the Depression CAT (48 [41-55] versus 48 [42-53]; difference of medians: 0; p = 0.662). However, having at least one hand posture was associated with a higher degree of catastrophic thinking (PCS scores: 13 [6-26] versus 10 [3-16]; difference of medians: 3; p = 0.0104) and a higher level of kinesophobia (TSK: 40 ± 6 versus 38 ± 6; mean difference: -2 [CI, -4 to -1]; p = 0.0420). Greater catastrophic thinking was associated with a greater number of protective hand postures on average (rho: 0.20, p = 0.0138). CONCLUSIONS: Protective hand postures and (based on prior research) specific words and phrases are associated with catastrophic thinking and kinesophobia, less effective coping strategies that hinder recovery. Surgeons can learn to recognize these signs and begin to treat catastrophic thinking and kinesophobia starting with compassion, empathy, and patience and be prepared to add formal support (such as cognitive-behavioral therapy) to help facilitate recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Digital Replantation versus Revision Amputation.

Background Earlier, digit viability judged the success of digital replantation. Now, utility health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures can better assess the impact of digital replantation. Methods Overall, 264 digital injury patients were sent a regimen of utility measures: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions, visual analog scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG). Overall, 51 patients responded completely to all of these-36 replantation patients and 15 revision amputation patients. The utility results of these patients were stratified between replantation versus revision amputation; dominant hand replantation versus nondominant hand replantation; and dominant hand revision amputation versus nondominant hand revision amputation. Results The mean VAS score of replant (0.84) and revision amputation (0.75) groups was significantly different (p = 0.05). The mean DASH score of dominant hand replantations (29.72) and nondominant hand replantations (17.97) was significantly different (p = 0.027). The dominant hand revision amputation had higher anxiety levels in comparison to nondominant hand revision amputation (p = 0.027). Patients with two or more digits replanted showed a significant decrease in VAS, TTO, and SG scores in comparison to patients who only had one digit replanted (p = 0.009, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively). Conclusions This study suggests that HRQOL can offer better indices for outcomes of digital replantation. This shows some specific replantation cohorts have a significantly better quality of life when compared with their specific correlating revision amputation cohort. These findings can be employed to further refine indications and contraindications to replantation and help predict the quality of life outcomes.

Determinants of disability after fingertip injuries.

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors, such as depression, catastrophic thinking, and self-efficacy, account for more of the variation in upper extremity disability than motion and other impairments, but their influence in the setting of hand trauma is less well studied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine which factors account for variation in disability 1 month after fingertip injuries. METHODS: We enrolled 82 patients with finger injuries distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint, and 70 patients completed the study. Questionnaires and measurements were taken at the initial visit and approximately 1 month later. Patients completed the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the pain self-efficacy questionnaire, and the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess depressive symptoms. Bivariate and multivariable analyses determined factors associated with QuickDASH scores. RESULTS: The mean disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand questionnaire score was 35 at the initial visit (the U.S. norm is 10) and 17 approximately 1 month later. The best model explained 54% of the variation in disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand questionnaire 1 month after injury and included symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire; partial R2 0.43) and injury mechanism (saw injury compared with sport injury; partial R2 0.14). The criterion symptoms of depression was also the factor most strongly associated with both pain intensity and time off work. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with fingertip injury, symptoms of depression account for most of the variability in hand and arm-specific disability, pain intensity, and days to return to work. Identification and treatment of symptoms of depression might facilitate recovery from fingertip injuries.

The influence of job satisfaction, burnout, pain, and worker's compensation status on disability after finger injuries.

PURPOSE: Motivation, job satisfaction, burnout, and secondary gain are factors that can influence return to work and disability after orthopedic injuries. The current study evaluated the separate effects of job satisfaction, burnout, and secondary gain on arm-specific disability after a finger injury. METHODS: Ninety-three employed patients with finger injuries were enrolled in this prospective study, and 51 completed the follow-up. Burnout (measured with Shirom-Melamed's Burnout Measure), job satisfaction (measured with the Job Descriptive Index questionnaire), and demographics were assessed at the initial visit. After 6 months, arm-specific disability was measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and general health status was measured with the Short Form-36 (SF-36) survey, mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS). RESULTS: In the 51 patients with complete follow-up, the mean DASH score was 12, the mean SF-36 PCS was 48, the mean SF-36 MCS was 49, and the mean pain rating was 2.1. In multivariable analysis, pain and worker's compensation status explained 52% of the variability in DASH scores (pain alone accounted for 49%); pain accounted for 14% of the variability in SF-36 PCS scores; and worker's compensation accounted for 11% of the variation in the SF-36 MCS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of variation in the SF-36 PCS and MCS scores remained unaccounted for by the models, but pain and worker's compensation were more important than job burnout or job satisfaction. Pain and worker's compensation were also significant predictors of the DASH. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Worker's compensation and pain were more important than job satisfaction and burnout in explaining variations in arm-specific disability in patients with finger injuries.

Finger prosthesis: the art of reconstruction.

Hand deformities affect aesthetics function of hand severely compromised and also cause psychological disturbances. This report describes the fabrication of a silicone finger prosthesis for a patient after an accident at work. The finger prosthesis was retained by a vacuum effect on the stump. The silicone material Silastic-MDX 44210 was used to provide function and aesthetics. The finger prosthesis offered psychological, functional and rehabilitative advantages for the patient. Restoring the natural appearance with the prosthesis eliminated the trauma generated by the dysfunction and represented an efficient psychological therapy.

Self-inflicted finger injury in individuals with spinal cord injury: an analysis of 5 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of finger autophagia in 5 persons with traumatic spinal cord injury and to present a discussion of putative causes and potential treatments. BACKGROUND: Minor self-mutilating actions, such as nail biting and hair pulling, are common in humans and usually benign. In some circumstances, these behaviors are associated with obsessive-compulsive personality traits. In humans, self-injurious biting behaviors are well described in the setting of mental retardation and psychosis and in persons with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome. Rare cases of human autophagia in persons with intact cognition have been reported, most commonly in the setting of acquired nervous system lesions. After spinal cord injury, it has been suggested that this behavior constitutes a human variant of animal autotomy and a response to neuropathic pain. DESIGN: Case presentation narrative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Photographic and radiological study, administration of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). FINDINGS: In 5 patients with complete tetraplegia, pain in the hands was present in only one instance. The severity of autoamputation varied from minor to extreme. In all cases, damage was confined to analgesic body parts. In 3 cases, autophagia behavior was discovered in progress. Treatments included pharmacotherapy, counseling, and behavioral therapy, with mixed results. All patients were intelligent, willing to discuss their issues, and able to identify conditions of stress and isolation in their lives. Mild preinjury obsessive-compulsive behaviors, such as nail biting, were universal. On the YBOCS, only 1 patient scored in a range indicative of mild obsessive-compulsive symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: This group exhibited heterogeneous medical, social, and cultural characteristics. A link between pain and self-injurious behavior could not be demonstrated. This behavior may be viewed as an extreme variant of nail biting, with potential ominous complications. Treatment strategies have been employed with mixed results.

Self-amputation of a healthy hand: a case of body integrity identity disorder.

A case report is presented of self-amputation of a healthy hand. We have reviewed the literature and seek to broaden the scope of understanding of Body Integrity Identity Disorder. This rare condition can constitute a pitfall for the unsuspecting hand surgeon.

Toe-to-hand transplantation surgery.

This article discusses toe-to-hand transplantation. The purpose of this article is to familiarize nurses with this procedure. In many cases, the actions taken initially and postoperatively may have a direct effect on the success or failure of the surgery. Two different procedures are discussed. The first procedure is replantation or revascularization of amputated digits in which time is of the essence and is usually performed right after the initial injury. The second procedure is the toe-to-hand transfer, which is an elective procedure in which there is less emphasis on time. This procedure occurs a few months after the initial accident.

Open Finger Fractures: Incidence, Patterns of Injury and the Influence of Social Deprivation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the patterns and epidemiology of open finger fractures. There is little good data about these injuries. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in a single trauma unit serving a well-defined population. RESULTS: Over a 15 year period 1090 open finger fractures were treated in 1014 patients. These made up the vast majority of open fractures treated in the trauma unit during this period. The incidence of open finger fractures was 14.0 per 100,000 patients per year. Deprivation did not influence the incidence of open finger fractures but did affect treatment choices for women. Most open finger fractures resulted from crush injuries or falls and required only simple operative treatments: debridement, lavage and early mobilization. CONCLUSIONS: Open finger fractures formed the majority of the workload of open fractures at our trauma centre but usually required simple treatments only. Social deprivation was not shown to influence the patterns or epidemiology of these injuries but did affect treatment choices for women.

Cross-cultural variation in preference for replantation or revision amputation: Societal and surgeon views.

Treatment decisions after an injury like finger amputation are made based on injury and patient factors. However, decisions can also be influenced by provider and patient preferences. We compared hand surgeon and societal preferences and attitudes regarding finger amputation treatment in Japan and the US. We performed a cross-sectional survey with subjects derived from large tertiary care academic institutions in the US and Japan. We secured 100% participation of American hand surgeon members of the Finger Replantation and Amputation Multicenter Study and presenting hand surgeons at the 32nd Annual meeting of the Central Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Societal preferences were gathered from volunteers at the 2 universities in the US and Japan. There were no significant differences in estimations of function, sensation, or appearance after replantation; American and Japanese societal participants preferred replantation compared to surgeons, although this was more pronounced in Japan. The Japanese society displayed more negative attitudes toward finger amputees than did Japanese surgeons. American respondents anticipated more public stigmatisation of amputees than did American surgeons. Societal preference for replantation was not caused by inflated expectations of outcomes after replantation. Japanese societal preference was likely driven by negative views of finger amputees. American society noted no decrease in physical health after amputation, but did note a quality of life decrease attributed to public stigmatisation. Japanese society and surgeons had a stronger preference for replantation than American society and surgeons, possibly attributed to cultural differences.

Functional and aesthetic outcomes of the fingertips after nail lengthening using the eponychial flap.

INTRODUCTION: Eponychial flap technique is able to lengthen the visible nail and allow the preservation of the nail complex following fingertip amputations with nail bed involvement. The study assessed the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstructed fingertips using the eponychial flap. METHODS: Eponychial flaps were performed in 11 fingertip amputations. Two-point discrimination, light touch, Purdue dexterity test, and pinch power of the reconstructed digits were examined. Patient-reported outcomes including subjective pain, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, and visual analog scale for appearance were documented. For comparison, nine patients with similar fingertip amputations treated by stump revision and nail bed ablation were included. RESULTS: The average length of the visible nail beds of the injured digits was 33.3% compared with the contralateral normal nail beds. The eponychial flap could lengthen the nail beds by an average of 32.4% of the length of the contralateral side. The mean follow-up was 26 months. Patients treated using the eponychial flap had greater pinch power of the reconstructed digits, higher satisfaction, and better aesthetic results when compared with patients receiving stump revision and nail bed ablation. There were no significant differences between two groups in sensation and Purdue dexterity test. Patient satisfaction was correlated with the reconstructed nail length. CONCLUSION: The eponychial flap is a simple and safe technique that can restore the functional and aesthetic fingertip in selected distal phalanx amputations. The aesthetics, pinch power, and patient satisfaction are significantly better with fingernail preservation and elongation using the eponychial flap.

Replantation vs revision amputation in single digit zone II amputations.

The objective of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of zone II amputations treated with either replantation or revision amputation at our institution to better aid patients in their decision making process regarding these treatment options. We conducted a comparative retrospective study. All cases of single digit amputations received at our replantation center between 2007 and 2011 were screened for single digit zone II injuries. These patients were stratified based on the treatment received: replantation vs revision amputation. Patients were called and invited to participate in the research project. Those who accepted to enter the study were asked to complete the Quick-DASH, the Beck Depression Inventory-short form, and a custom made questionnaire. There were seventeen patients with single digit zone II replantation and fourteen patients with similar injuries who underwent revision amputation and agreed to take part in the study. Our data revealed that the duration of sick leave, occupation after injury, professional and social reintegration, discontinued activities, and self-confidence were not statistically different between the two groups. The average hospital stay and the follow-up period of replanted individuals were longer. The replantation group did not have higher levels of pain or cold intolerance, and the global functional and esthetic satisfaction levels were similar between the two groups. Also, Beck Depression Inventory and Quick-DASH scores were not statistically different. Yet, significantly more patients in the replantation group would opt to repeat the replantation than revised patients would opt for revision amputation. From a functional viewpoint, our study suggests that revision amputation is not superior to replantation in zone II single digit amputations. This is valuable information that should be given to patients when deciding on the treatment process and to insure a proper informed consent.

Emotional disturbances in trauma patients during the rehabilitation phase: studies of posttraumatic stress disorder and alexithymia.

Recent studies have shown a partial similarity between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alexithymia. In this study, the authors examined the relationship between PTSD and alexithymia in two samples of 26 patients with burn injury and 27 patients with digit amputation during rehabilitation. The prevalence rates of DSM-III-R PTSD and alexithymia assessed by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) were significantly higher for injury patients than for healthy volunteers. The rate of PTSD symptoms of avoidance and emotional numbing was significantly and positively correlated with the TAS scores in injury patients. The PTSD symptoms of avoidance and emotional numbing had a significant relationship with function after digit replantation. Alexithymia also had a similar relationship with physical conditions. These results suggest that 1) in some cases, alexithymia may be evident when PTSD emotional symptoms appear in injury patients, and 2) emotional disturbances (i.e., PTSD symptoms of avoidance and emotional numbing and alexithymia) may be influenced by the level of functional recovery after digit replantation.

Psychosocial adjustment of victims of occupational hand injuries.

A group of hand injury patients was followed up 2-3 years after their injury. Compared to a non-patient control group hand injury patients were more externally oriented, and reported more psychological symptoms. Based on their General Health Questionnaire scores, the patients were divided into a low score and a high score group. High GHQ scores were associated with external locus of control, less social activities, and dissatisfaction with social life. The medical rating of loss of earning capacity was not predictive of overall occupational or psychosocial adjustment. Suggestions are made for future research into determinants of occupational adjustment of these patients.

Rehabilitation process and functional results of patients with amputated fingers.

Digit amputation is a physical and psychological trauma that can influence the daily living of a person. The rehabilitation of patients with digit amputation is a complex process and should take into consideration all influencing factors, such as the functional, emotional, social, and professional profile of the patient. This study was conducted to evaluate the functional level of patients with amputated fingers and to understand the factors that influence their rehabilitation. Fifty patients (42 male and 8 female with an age ranging from 7 to 84 years) who had digit amputation(s) between January of 1990 and December of 1998 at the level of the metacarpus or distal to it and who had at least 6 months of follow-up were examined. The patients were divided into three different study groups: patients with distal amputation were compared with patients who had proximal amputation, patients with one finger amputation were compared with patients who had multiple finger amputations, and patients who suffered finger amputations caused by work-related accidents were compared with those who suffered amputations caused by other incidents. In addition, the time lapse from the amputation was checked as an influencing factor for different functional levels. The results showed that patients with distal amputation reached a higher motor and sensory functional level than patients with proximal amputation. Patients with one-finger amputation reached higher motor, sensory, and activities of daily living functional levels than patients with multiple amputations, and the level of motor and sensory function of patients with finger amputations caused by work-related accidents was lower than that of patients who suffered amputations in other incidents. Time was proven to be an important factor in the process of motor and emotional recovery.

The role of Mepitel silicone net dressings in the management of fingertip injuries in children.

Forty-five children with isolated fingertip injuries were randomized for treatment with either Mepitel silicone net dressings or paraffin gauze dressings. Over a 4 week period, the objective adherence of the dressing, and the perceived level of stress caused to the child by the dressing change were scored by linear analogue scales. The wounds were also assessed for the progress of healing and presence of infection. Twenty children received Mepitel dressings and 25 had paraffin gauze dressings. There was no difference in duration of healing or complication rates between the two groups. Statistically lower scores were seen for the Mepitel group for the first 3 weeks in both adherence and stress scores. These results suggest that silicone net dressings may be a less adherent and less painful method of dressing fingertip injuries in children.

Toe to hand transfer in children. Part 2: Functional and psychological aspects.

Forty children with congenital (85%) or acquired hand disorders underwent transfer of one or two toes to one hand. The children were reviewed with their parents and assessed for functional and psychosocial performance. There was some evidence that the older the child at the time of transfer, the better the range of motion. The passive range of motion was on average 60 degrees more than the active range of motion despite subsequent procedures such as tenolysis. All transfers recovered protective sensibility and the majority recovered good levels of two point discrimination and light touch perception. Almost all transfers were naturally incorporated into the use pattern of the limb for some or most of the time. Most parents and patients reported a very positive effect of this surgery on the child's psychosocial functioning.

[Patient motivation--an essential therapeutic tool]. / Patientenmotivation--unverzichtbare therapeutische Hilfe.

A deciding factor for the future functioning of a hand with a mutilating hand injury is the self-motivation that the patient brings with him to rehabilitation. This is illustrated in the case of a guitar teacher who returned to his career after subtotal and total finger amputation of his left hand (used for gripping chords). With consistent exercise on his instrument he compensated for the functional deficits of his hand and won a law suit against his employer who denied that he had the physical ability to play the classical guitar. It is more clear than ever that an injured person is jointly responsible, through self-motivation in the working process, for more-or-less complete rehabilitation. It is not uncommon in a system of job-sharing in which several members of the health service (surgeons, physiotherapists, social workers, general practitioners) must co-ordinate their work, for the patient--if he does not involve himself--to fall by the wayside. It is shown how inherent and rewarding it can be to support the patient in his desire to return to work. Apart from that, we hope that this example will be an encouragement to those similarly affected.