Activity of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in 3D cell culture.

BACKGROUND: Cell spheroids and aggregates generated from three-dimensional (3D) cell culture methods are similar to in vivo tumors in terms of tissue morphology, biology, and gene expression, unlike cells grown in 2D cell cultures. Breast cancer heterogeneity is one of the main drug resistant mechanisms and needs to be overcome in order to increase the efficacy of drug activity in its treatments. METHODS: We performed a unique 3D cell culture and drug efficacy study with trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla®, T-DM1) across five breast cancer cell lines (BT-474, SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-361, MDA-MB-175, and MCF-7) that were previously investigated in 2D cell culture. We performed HER2 IHC staining, cell viability experiments, Gene-protein-assay (GPA), and T-DM1 internalization studies. RESULTS: We obtained significantly different results including higher IC50 for some of the cell lines. Our GPA showed some significant heterogeneous HER2 gene and protein expression in 3D cultured spheroids or aggregates. The fluorescent images also showed that a longer incubation time is needed for T-DM1 to be internalized effectively into 3D cultured spheroids or aggregates. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the difference of T-DM1 drug activity in 3D spheroids or aggregates might be due to tumor heterogeneity and less efficient internalization of T-DM1 that is not seen using 2D cell culture models. Drug studies using 3D cell culture are expected to provide biologically relevant models for determining drug activity in tumor tissue in future drug response and resistance research.

HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity analyses by concurrent HER2 gene and protein assessment for the prognosis of HER2 negative invasive breast cancer patients.

HER2 gene-protein assay (GPA) is a new method for the simultaneous evaluation of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HER2 dual in situ hybridization (DISH) on single tissue sections of breast cancer. We investigated the presence of HER2 gene and protein discrepancy and HER2-heterogeneity using HER2-GPA. HER2 status was analyzed for the correlation between the presence of HER2-heterogeneity and patient prognosis. Consecutive 280 invasive breast cancer were examined. Statuses of HER2 protein and gene were evaluated in whole tumor sections of HER2 GPA slides. HER2 protein and gene combination patterns were classified to six phenotypic and genotypic types for each case, as well as at individual cell levels: (A) IHC and DISH positive; (B) IHC positive and DISH negative; (C) IHC equivocal and DISH positive; (D) IHC equivocal and DISH negative; (E) IHC negative and DISH positive; and (F) IHC and DISH negative. The presence of HER2-heterogeneity was determined by the existence of at least two of six types within one tumor. HER2-IHC positive patients had significantly worse survival than IHC negative patients and HER2-DISH positive patients had significantly worse survival than DISH negative patients. HER2 IHC negative and DISH positive patients had significantly worse recurrence-free survival than IHC and DISH negative patients. In the HER2 IHC and DISH negative group, the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Notably, among triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the HER2 heterogeneous group had significantly worse survival than the nonheterogeneous group. Our study suggests that the presence of HER2-heterogeneity might be a prognostic factor in HER2 negative breast cancer patients, especially in TNBC.

The assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: the past, the present, and the future.

Humanized monoclonal anti-human growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody trastuzumab was approved for HER2 positive breast cancer patient treatment 11 years after the demonstration of HER2 gene amplification associated with the HER2 protein overexpression in breast cancer in 1987. HER2 positive status of breast cancer patients is assessed by HER2 gene amplification with in situ hybridization (ISH) and/or HER2 protein overexpression with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Because the discordance between quantitative HER2 ISH and subjective, semi-quantitative HER2 IHC assay results is a well-recognized issue of HER2 testing, we developed an assay combining HER2 ISH and HER2 IHC assays (HER2 gene-protein assay; HER2 GPA) as one test on the same tissue section. HER2 GPA allows pathologists to score the HER2 gene and HER2 protein status simultaneously at the individual cell level. The possibility that HER2 GPA may become the next generation of HER2 testing is discussed, particularly for cases in which it is difficult to assess the HER2 status of breast cancer patients due to the HER2 heterogeneity.

Therapeutic Area Data Standards for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Report From the Polycystic Kidney Disease Outcomes Consortium (PKDOC).

Data standards provide a structure for consistent understanding and exchange of data and enable the integration of data across studies for integrated analysis. There is no data standard applicable to kidney disease. We describe the process for development of the first-ever Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) data standard for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) by the Polycystic Kidney Disease Outcomes Consortium (PKDOC). Definition of common data elements and creation of ADPKD-specific data standards from case report forms used in long-term ADPKD registries, an observational cohort (Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease [CRISP] 1 and 2), and a randomized clinical trial (Halt Progression of Polycystic Kidney Disease [HALT-PKD]) are described in detail. This data standard underwent extensive review, including a global public comment period, and is now available online as the first PKD-specific data standard (www.cdisc.org/therapeutic). Submission of clinical trial data that use standard data structures and terminology will be required for new electronic submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration for all disease areas by the end of 2016. This data standard will allow for the mapping and pooling of available data into a common data set in addition to providing a foundation for future studies, data sharing, and long-term registries in ADPKD. This data set will also be used to support the regulatory qualification of total kidney volume as a prognostic biomarker for use in clinical trials. The availability of consensus data standards for ADPKD has the potential to facilitate clinical trial initiation and increase sharing and aggregation of data across observational studies and among completed clinical trials, thereby improving our understanding of disease progression and treatment.

A novel gene-protein assay for evaluating HER2 status in gastric cancer: simultaneous analyses of HER2 protein overexpression and gene amplification reveal intratumoral heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression and gene amplification are important biomarkers for trastuzumab treatment in breast and gastric cancer patients. Gastric cancer presents high rates of tumor heterogeneity, which may influence the results of HER2 testing. A novel gene-protein assay (GPA) can allow the simultaneous analysis of HER2 protein and gene status on a single slide. METHODS: Using the tissue microarray technique, the HER2 status of each of 875 gastric cancer cases was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), brightfield dual-color in situ hybridization (DISH), and GPA. Intratumoral phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity were evaluated by comparing the HER2 statuses of two tissue cores from each case. RESULTS: There was excellent concordance between GPA and IHC (99.2 %), as well as between GPA and DISH results (99.3 %). HER2 positivity obtained by GPA was almost identical (99.8 %) to the results obtained by IHC and DISH assays. Intratumoral phenotypic heterogeneity was more frequently observed in IHC 2+ cases (63.5 %) compared with IHC 3+ cases (28.3 %). Phenotypic heterogeneity (48.8 %) was more frequently observed than genotypic heterogeneity (26.8 %). Tumor heterogeneity was consistently observed from early to advanced stages. CONCLUSIONS: HER2-positive gastric cancers presented different levels of HER2 protein expression and gene amplification statuses within the same lesion in almost half the cases examined. Evaluating both phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity may contribute to a deeper understanding and improved prediction of clinical outcome in gastric cancer patients treated with trastuzumab. This newly established GPA technology may also be useful for developing biomarkers for other molecularly targeted therapies.

Intratumoral Estrogen Receptor Heterogeneity of Expression in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer as Evaluated by a Brightfield Multiplex Assay.

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with evolving genetic alterations and expressions of receptor proteins. Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is considered to be a resistance factor in response to targeted therapies. The current single-slide, single-marker immunohistochemistry techniques cannot accurately assess ITH at the individual cancer cell level. In this study, we develop a novel brightfield multiplex assay to simultaneously assess estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein markers, together with the HER2 gene and the centromere of chromosome 17 (CEP17) copy numbers, using a single tissue section. The data presented herein demonstrate heterogeneous cancer cell subpopulations in 11 HER2-positive/ER-positive (HER2+/ER+) tumors among 33 BCs analyzed immunohistochemically (HER2 score of 2+ or 3+). The predominant cancer cell subpopulation was HER2+/ER- (50.18%), followed by HER2+/ER+ (39.05%), HER2-/ER+ (4.26%), ER- with HER2 microheterogeneity cancer cells (3.58%), and ER+ with HER2 microheterogeneity cancer cells (2.93%). The three other tumor subtypes, namely, HER2-/ER+, HER2+/ER-, and HER2-/ER-, were more homogeneous, representing 82.59%, 99.22%, and 100% of cancer cells, respectively. This novel assay revealed that HER2+ cancer cells were more predominant than ER+ cancer cells in HER2+/ER+ tumors and provided new insights toward our understanding of BC carcinogenesis.

Development of a PD-L1 Complementary Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP142) for Atezolizumab.

Cancer immunotherapies, such as atezolizumab, are proving to be a valuable therapeutic strategy across indications, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial cancer (UC). Here, we describe a diagnostic assay that measures programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, via immunohistochemistry, to identify patients who will derive the most benefit from treatment with atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody. We describe the performance of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) Assay in terms of specificity, sensitivity, and the ability to stain both tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC), in NSCLC and UC tissues. The reader precision, repeatability and intermediate precision, interlaboratory reproducibility, and the effectiveness of pathologist training on the assessment of PD-L1 staining on both TC and IC were evaluated. We detail the analytical validation of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) Assay for PD-L1 expression in NSCLC and UC tissues and show that the assay reliably evaluated staining on both TC and IC across multiple expression levels/clinical cut-offs. The reader precision showed high overall agreement when compared with consensus scores. In addition, pathologists met the predefined training criteria (≥85.0% overall percent agreement) for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC and UC tissues with an average overall percent agreement ≥95.0%. The assay evaluates PD-L1 staining on both cell types and is robust and precise. In addition, it can help to identify those patients who may benefit the most from treatment with atezolizumab, although treatment benefit has been demonstrated in an all-comer NSCLC and UC patient population.

A Proposed Set of Metrics to Reduce Patient Safety Risk From Within the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic pathology laboratory workflow consists of 3 major specimen handling processes. Among the workflow are preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases that contain multistep subprocesses with great impact on patient care. A worldwide representation of experts came together to create a system of metrics, as a basis for laboratories worldwide, to help them evaluate and improve specimen handling to reduce patient safety risk. METHOD: Members of the Initiative for Anatomic Pathology Laboratory Patient Safety (IAPLPS) pooled their extensive expertise to generate a list of metrics highlighting processes with high and low risk for adverse patient outcomes. RESULTS: : Our group developed a universal, comprehensive list of 47 metrics for patient specimen handling in the anatomic pathology laboratory. Steps within the specimen workflow sequence are categorized as high or low risk. In general, steps associated with the potential for specimen misidentification correspond to the high-risk grouping and merit greater focus within quality management systems. Primarily workflow measures related to operational efficiency can be considered low risk. CONCLUSION: Our group intends to advance the widespread use of these metrics in anatomic pathology laboratories to reduce patient safety risk and improve patient care with development of best practices and interlaboratory error reporting programs.

Validation of an electronic program for pathologist training in the interpretation of a complex companion diagnostic immunohistochemical assay.

Companion diagnostics assay interpretation can select patients with the greatest targeted therapy benefits. We present the results from a prospective study demonstrating that pathologists can effectively learn immunohistochemical assay-interpretation skills from digital image-based electronic training (e-training). In this study, e-training was used to train board-certified pathologists to evaluate non-small cell lung carcinoma for eligibility for treatment with onartuzumab, a MET-inhibiting agent. The training program mimicked the live training that was previously validated in clinical trials for onartuzumab. A digital interface was developed for pathologists to review high-resolution, static images of stained slides. Sixty-four pathologists practicing in the United States enrolled while blinded to the type of training. After training, both groups completed a mandatory final test using glass slides. The results indicated both training modalities to be effective. Overall, 80.6% of e-trainees and 72.7% of live trainees achieved passing scores (at least 85%) on the final test. All study participants reported that their training experience was "good" and that they had received sufficient information to determine the adequacy of case slide staining to score each case. This study established that an e-training program conducted under highly controlled conditions can provide pathologists with the skills necessary to interpret a complex assay and that these skills can be equivalent to those achieved with face-to-face training using conventional microscopy. Programs of this type are scalable for global distribution and offer pathologists the potential for readily accessible and robust training in new companion diagnostic assays linked to novel, targeted, adjuvant therapies for cancer patients.

Overlapping upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with constipation or diarrhea.

OBJECTIVES: Distinguishing between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia can be challenging because of the variations in symptom patterns, which commonly overlap. However, the overlap is poorly quantified, and it is equally uncertain whether symptom patterns differ in subgroups of IBS arbitrarily defined by primary bowel patterns of constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D). We aimed to determine and to compare the distribution of GI symptoms, both, upper and lower, among IBS-C and IBS-D patients. METHODS: A total of 121 consecutive patients presenting with a diagnosis of IBS were grouped according to primary bowel symptoms as IBS-C (58 women and 18 men, mean age 47 +/- 17 yr) or IBS-D (26 women and 19 men, mean age 47 +/- 15 yr). The Hopkins Bowel Symptom Questionnaire, which includes a brief Quality of Life assessment, and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 90-Revised were completed by all patients at intake. RESULTS: IBS-C patients reported significantly more overall GI symptoms when compared to patients with IBS-D (6.67 vs 4.62, respectively, p<0.001). Abdominal pain patterns differed in patients with IBS-C versus IBS-D (lower abdominal pain: 40.8% vs 24.4% p=0.05 and upper abdominal pain: 36.8% vs 24.4%, respectively). Bloating was substantially more common in IBS-C patients (75%) than in IBS-D (40.9%). There were no significant differences in personality subscales by IBS subgroup; however, somatization was positively associated with multiple symptom reports and was negatively correlated with quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Upper GI symptoms consistent with functional dyspepsia were more frequent in IBS-C. Although there was considerable overlap of upper and lower GI symptoms in patients with IBS-C and IBS-D, the former had more frequent lower abdominal pain and bloating.