Molecular regulators of defective placental and cardiovascular development in fetal growth restriction.

Placental insufficiency is one of the major causes of fetal growth restriction (FGR), a significant pregnancy disorder in which the fetus fails to achieve its full growth potential in utero. As well as the acute consequences of being born too small, affected offspring are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and other chronic diseases in later life. The placenta and heart develop concurrently, therefore placental maldevelopment and function in FGR may have profound effect on the growth and differentiation of many organ systems, including the heart. Hence, understanding the key molecular players that are synergistically linked in the development of the placenta and heart is critical. This review highlights the key growth factors, angiogenic molecules and transcription factors that are common causes of defective placental and cardiovascular development.

Reconciling the distinct roles of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors in the placenta and maternal circulation of normal and pathological pregnancies.

A branched vascular network is crucial to placental development and is dependent on factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin (sEng) to regulate blood vessel growth. Imbalances in these factors can lead to aberrant placental vascular development. Throughout pregnancy, these factors are also released into the maternal circulation to aid in adapting the maternal cardiovascular system to pregnancy. Increased secretion of anti-angiogenic factors can lead to the development of an anti-angiogenic state in the mother and contribute to the development of pregnancy pathologies such as pre-eclampsia and foetal growth restriction (FGR). Thus, what are commonly referred to as 'angiogenic factors' have distinct functions in the maternal and placental circulations making this a misnomer. Indeed, technical issues in this field such as assay methodology and lack of data considering different placental cell types mean that the physiological roles of these factors in the maternal and placental circulations are frequently muddled in the literature. This review aims to (1) unpick the distinct roles of factors that influence placental vascular development and separate these from the roles of the same factors within the maternal circulation in normal pregnancy and (2) critically assess how imbalances may contribute to the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pregnancy disorders. Together, this critical assessment of the field endeavours to improve our ability to accurately use these factors as predictive/diagnostic biomarkers in the future.

The Chondrogenic Potential of First-Trimester and Term Placental Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells.

OBJECTIVES: Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a well-established cell source for cartilage engineering, but challenges remain as differentiation often results in chondrocyte hypertrophy. Chondrogenic potential also varies with MSC source and donor age. We assessed the chondrogenic potential of first-trimester and term placental MSCs and compared their response to commonly used bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs). DESIGN: MSCs were isolated from first-trimester and term placentae. BM-MSCs were commercially obtained. Chondrogenesis was induced by micromass culture in commercial chondrogenic media for 7, 14, or 21 days. Pellets were assessed for glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, and types I, II, and X collagen. Gene expression was profiled using Qiagen RT2 human MSC arrays. RESULTS: At day 0, first-trimester and term MSCs expression levels of many chondrogenic genes to BM-MSC after 21 days of culture. Only first trimester MSCs showed significant changes in chondrogenic gene expression during induction compared to day 0 undifferentiated MSCs (greater BMP4, KAT2B, and reduced GDF6 expression). Additionally, first-trimester MSCs showed significantly greater expression of ABCB1 (at days 14 and 21) and BMP4 (at days 7, 14, 21) compared with term MSCs. Both first-trimester and term pellets showed increased GAG content over time and term MSCs had significantly GAG greater compared with BM-MSCs at days 7 and 14. Type II collagen was present in all pellets but unlike BM-MSCs, type I collagen was not observed in first-trimester or term MSC pellets. CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight differences in BM-MSC and placental MSC chondrogenesis and demonstrate that placental MSCs may be an alternative cell source.

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells from the Placentae of Growth Restricted Pregnancies Are Poor Stimulators of Angiogenesis.

The extensively branched vascular network within the placenta is vital for materno-fetal exchange, and inadequate development of this network is implicated in the pregnancy disorder fetal growth restriction (FGR), where babies are born pathologically small. Placental mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (pMSCs) and placental macrophages both reside in close proximity to blood vessels within the placenta, where they are thought to promote angiogenesis via paracrine mechanisms. However, the relationship between pMSCs, macrophages and placental vascular development has not yet been examined. We aimed to determine if inadequate paracrine stimulation of placental vascular development by pMSCs and macrophages during pregnancy may contribute to the inadequate vascularisation seen in FGR. Media conditioned by MSCs from FGR placentae significantly inhibited endothelial tube formation, compared to conditioned media derived from normal pMSCs. Similarly, macrophages exposed to media conditioned by FGR pMSCs were less able to stimulate endothelial tube formation in comparison to macrophages exposed to media conditioned by normal pMSCs. While MSCs from normal placentae produce a combination of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic cytokines, there were no significant differences in the secretion of the anti-angiogenic cytokines thrombospondin-1, insulin growth factor binding protein-4, or decorin between normal and FGR pMSCs that could explain how FGR pMSCs inhibited endothelial tube formation. Together, these data suggest a dysregulation in the secretion of paracrine factors by pMSCs in FGR placentae. These findings illustrate how cross talk between pro-angiogenic cell types in the placenta may be crucial for adequate angiogenesis.