Comparison of implant primary stability between maxillary edentulous ridges receiving intramembranous origin block grafts
Monje, Alberto; Suárez, Fernando; Wang, Hom-Lay; Monje, Florencio; González-García, Raúl; Villanueva-Alcojol, Laura; García-Nogales, Agustín; Galindo-Moreno, Pablo.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet)
; 18(3): 449-454, mayo 2013. ilus, tab
Artículo
en Inglés
| IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-112707
Purpose:
The purposes of the present study were to compare the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values of implant placed in either ramus or calvaria block grafts; and to determine if implant diameter influences RFA implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. Material andMethods:
This was a retrospective study that included 16 consecutives healthy patients treated with autogenous on lay block grafts for horizontal bone reconstruction in maxilla. Ten ramus and ten calvaria block graft treated patients were selected and compared.Results:
Totally, 59 implants were placed, 35 (59.3%) were placed on the calvaria bone grafts and the remaining24 (40.7%) were on the ramus bone graft. Of all the implants studied, 13 (22%), 35 (59.3%), and 11 (18.6%) were10 mm, 11.5 mm and 13 mm in length respectively. Regarding the diameter, 4 (7%) were 3.3 mm, 3 (5%) were 3.5mm, 20 (34%) were 3.7 mm and 32 (54%) were 4 mm. Mean ISQ value obtained by RFA was 73.06 ± 6.08, being72.19 ± 6 and 74.47 ± 6.06 for the calvaria and ramus treated group respectively. No significant differences were noted between the two groups (p= 0.154). Implants were pooled and divided by their diameter. Mean ISQ value obtained for 3.3 mm was 80 ± 5.09, while for 4.0 mm was 72.5 ± 7.19. Again, no significant differences were found among the groups (p= 0.138).Conclusion:
For RFA ISQ value, the bone graft origins (calvaria or ramus) or implant diameters did not influence the outcome (AU)
Biblioteca responsable:
ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
Documentos relacionados