Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concurrent use of capecitabine with radiation therapy and survival in breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Liu, YL; Chin, C; Catanese, B; Lee, SM; Zhan, S; Kalinsky, K; Connolly, EP.
Afiliación
  • Liu, YL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Department of Medicine. New York. USA
  • Chin, C; Columbia University Medical Center. New York Presbyterian Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology. New York. USA
  • Catanese, B; Columbia University Medical Center. New York Presbyterian Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology. New York. USA
  • Lee, SM; Columbia University School of Medicine. Department of Biostatistics. New York. USA
  • Zhan, S; Columbia University School of Medicine. Department of Biostatistics. New York. USA
  • Kalinsky, K; Columbia University Medical Center. New York Presbyterian Hospital. Department of Medical Oncology. New York. USA
  • Connolly, EP; Columbia University Medical Center. New York Presbyterian Hospital. Department of Radiation Oncology. New York. USA
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(10): 1280-1288, oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-173716
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Capecitabine has been studied as a radiosensitizer, and our study seeks to examine the association of concurrent capecitabine/radiation therapy (RT) on event-free- (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with breast cancer (BC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods/patients In a retrospective study of women with BC who received adriamycin/taxane-based NAC from 2004-2016, we identified 21 women administered concurrent capecitabine/RT. To assess differences in survival, we selected a clinical control cohort (n = 57) based on criteria used to select patients for capecitabine/RT. We also created a matched cohort (21), matching on tumor subtype, pathological stage and age (< 50 or 50+ years). Differences in EFS, using STEEP criteria, and OS, using all-cause mortality, between those who received capecitabine/RT and controls were assessed.

Results:

Of the 21 women who received capecitabine/RT, median age was 52 years. The majority were pathologic stage III (n = 15) and hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative BC (n = 20). In those receiving capecitabine/RT, there were 9 events, compared with 14 events in clinical and 10 events in matched controls. Capecitabine/RT was associated with worse OS in clinical (HR 3.83 95% CI 1.12-13.11, p = 0.03) and matched controls (HR 3.71 95% CI 1.04-13.18, p = 0.04), after adjusting for clinical size, pathological stage and lymphovascular invasion. Capecitabine/RT was also associated with a trend towards worse EFS in clinical (HR 2.41 95% CI 0.86-6.74, p = 0.09) and matched controls (HR 2.68 95% CI 0.91-7.90, p = 0.07) after adjustment.

Conclusion:

Concurrent capecitabine/RT after NAC is associated with worse survival and should be carefully considered in BC
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Banco de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Radioterapia / Neoplasias de la Mama / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Capecitabina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Banco de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Radioterapia / Neoplasias de la Mama / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Capecitabina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article