[Measles, pertussis, rubella and mumps completeness of reporting. Literature review of estimates for industrialized countries]. / Proportion des déclarations de cas de rougeole, de coqueluche, de rubéole et d'oreillons aux systèmes de surveillance. Evaluation des études pour les pays industrialisés.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance data for infectious diseases in industrialized countries have been providing useful epidemiological information for several years. However, surveillance is complex and notifications underestimate the true disease incidence. The goal of this paper is to determine the completeness of reporting of measles, pertussis, rubella and mumps through notification in industrialized countries. METHODS: A thorough literature review of papers published (in French or English) on surveillance data of measles, pertussis, rubella and mumps was undertaken with PUBMED. The review was limited to studies conducted in industrialized countries that quantitatively assessed the completeness of the reporting of these diseases. RESULTS: Fourteen studies published from the 1920s met the inclusion criteria. For measles, the studies suggest that 64-85% of symptomatic patients sought medical care, 13-57% of those were diagnosed with measles and 22-81% of the diagnosed cases were reported for a completeness of reporting ranging from 7% to 63% between 1920 and 1980 and 3% to 41% in recent years. For pertussis, it was estimated that 49-59% of symptomatic patients sought medical care, 12% of those were diagnosed and 19-47% of the diagnosed cases were reported for a completeness of reporting ranging from 5% to 25% between 1920 and 1980 and from 3% to 12% in recent years. Very few studies on rubella and mumps were found and none allowed the determination of the global completeness of reporting. CONCLUSION: Reporting has been found to be considerably incomplete. Continued efforts to improve the recognition and reporting of these diseases are needed.